Defining Addition of Natural Numbers as the Algebra of 'Push-Along' Functions












3












$begingroup$


Let $N$ be a set containing an element $1$ and $sigma: N to N$ an injective function satisfying the following two properties:



$tag 1 1 notin sigma(N)$



$tag 2 (forall M subset N) ;text{If } [; 1 in M land (sigma(M) subset M) ;] text{ Then } M = N$



We call $(N, 1, sigma)$ a Peano system.



The set of all injective functions on $N$ form a semigroup under composition.



Let $mathcal C$ denote the set of all injective functions on $N$ that commute with $sigma$. It is easy to see that $mathcal C$ is a commutative semigroup containing the identity transformation.



Theorem 1: If $mu,nu in mathcal C$ and $mu(1) = nu(1)$ then $mu = nu$.

Proof

Let $M$ be the set of all elements in $N$ where the two functions agree. Applying induction with $text{(2)}$, it is immediately evident that $M = N$. $quad blacksquare$



Theorem 2: For any $m in N$, there exist a $mu in mathcal C$ such that $mu(1) = m$.

Proof

Again, simply apply induction. $quad blacksquare$



So $mathcal C$ is in bijective correspondence with $N$.



Theorem 3: Let $(N, sigma)$ and $(N', sigma')$ be two Peano systems and $mathcal C$ and $mathcal C'$ the corresponding semigroups. Then there exist one and only one bijective correspondence $beta: N to N'$ satisfying



$tag 3 beta(1) = 1'$



$tag 4 beta circ sigma = sigma' circ beta$



Proof

The function $beta$ is defined using recursion. Induction is used to show that $beta$ is injective. Induction is used to show that $beta$ is surjective. $quad blacksquare$



Using the above an argument can be supplied to prove the following.



Theorem 4: Let $(N, sigma)$ and $(N', sigma')$ be two Peano systems and $mathcal C$ and $mathcal C'$ the corresponding semigroups. Then the mapping $sigma mapsto sigma'$ can be extended to an algebraic isomorphism between $mathcal C$ and $mathcal C'$.



We reserve the symbol $mathbb N$ to denote $mathcal C$ and use the symbol $+$ to denote the binary operation of composition.



Using the axioms of $ZF$, the existence of Peano systems is no problem.



I couldn't find this technique here or on wikipedia, prompting




Is the theory described above coherent?




If it is it would certainly appeal to students who like to see some 'motion/action' when studying mathematical constructions, say somebody born to be a functional analyst.





Since there has been no feedback except for two upvotes, the theory is sound. So here we knock off the remaining properties of $(mathbb N,0,1,+)$ that we need to have under our belts. When this is competed, these properties will completely define the natural numbers under addition up to isomorphism.



Note that when convenient, we can always regard $0 in mathbb N$ as the identity mapping on $N$ and view the remaining elements in $mathbb N$ as (proper) injections.



Define the function $alpha$ on $mathbb N$ by $k mapsto k +1$.



Theorem 5: $(mathbb N, 0, alpha)$ is a Peano system.

Proof (sketch)

Translating back to $mathcal C$, the identity fucntion can't have the form $sigma circ tau$, since $sigma$ can't have a left and right inverse. So $text{(1)}$ is satisfied. To show $text{(2)}$, you use induction on $N$ and theorem 1 and theorem 2 to show that there is 'complete coverage'. $quad blacksquare$



The prior theorem is stating that $(mathbb N, 0, alpha)$ can be viewed as the 'dual Peano system' to $(N, 1, sigma)$.



Theorem 6: For $z,x,y in mathbb N$, if $z + x = z + y$, then $x = y$.

Proof

Injective functions always have a left inverse. $quad blacksquare$



Definition: For $m, n in mathbb N$, we write $m le n$ if there exist a $k in mathbb N$ such that $m + k = n$.



Theorem 7: The relation $(mathbb N, le)$ is a total ordering.

Proof (sketch)

At all steps, when necessary invoke theorem 6 and use algebraic manipulations. Transitivity is straightforward. To show antisymmetry, use the fact that $m + n = 0$ implies that both $m$ and $n$ are equal to $0$. To show the connex property, use induction and split out the logic. $quad blacksquare$



Theorem 8: Every nonempty subset of $mathbb N$ has a least element.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    Let $N$ be a set containing an element $1$ and $sigma: N to N$ an injective function satisfying the following two properties:



    $tag 1 1 notin sigma(N)$



    $tag 2 (forall M subset N) ;text{If } [; 1 in M land (sigma(M) subset M) ;] text{ Then } M = N$



    We call $(N, 1, sigma)$ a Peano system.



    The set of all injective functions on $N$ form a semigroup under composition.



    Let $mathcal C$ denote the set of all injective functions on $N$ that commute with $sigma$. It is easy to see that $mathcal C$ is a commutative semigroup containing the identity transformation.



    Theorem 1: If $mu,nu in mathcal C$ and $mu(1) = nu(1)$ then $mu = nu$.

    Proof

    Let $M$ be the set of all elements in $N$ where the two functions agree. Applying induction with $text{(2)}$, it is immediately evident that $M = N$. $quad blacksquare$



    Theorem 2: For any $m in N$, there exist a $mu in mathcal C$ such that $mu(1) = m$.

    Proof

    Again, simply apply induction. $quad blacksquare$



    So $mathcal C$ is in bijective correspondence with $N$.



    Theorem 3: Let $(N, sigma)$ and $(N', sigma')$ be two Peano systems and $mathcal C$ and $mathcal C'$ the corresponding semigroups. Then there exist one and only one bijective correspondence $beta: N to N'$ satisfying



    $tag 3 beta(1) = 1'$



    $tag 4 beta circ sigma = sigma' circ beta$



    Proof

    The function $beta$ is defined using recursion. Induction is used to show that $beta$ is injective. Induction is used to show that $beta$ is surjective. $quad blacksquare$



    Using the above an argument can be supplied to prove the following.



    Theorem 4: Let $(N, sigma)$ and $(N', sigma')$ be two Peano systems and $mathcal C$ and $mathcal C'$ the corresponding semigroups. Then the mapping $sigma mapsto sigma'$ can be extended to an algebraic isomorphism between $mathcal C$ and $mathcal C'$.



    We reserve the symbol $mathbb N$ to denote $mathcal C$ and use the symbol $+$ to denote the binary operation of composition.



    Using the axioms of $ZF$, the existence of Peano systems is no problem.



    I couldn't find this technique here or on wikipedia, prompting




    Is the theory described above coherent?




    If it is it would certainly appeal to students who like to see some 'motion/action' when studying mathematical constructions, say somebody born to be a functional analyst.





    Since there has been no feedback except for two upvotes, the theory is sound. So here we knock off the remaining properties of $(mathbb N,0,1,+)$ that we need to have under our belts. When this is competed, these properties will completely define the natural numbers under addition up to isomorphism.



    Note that when convenient, we can always regard $0 in mathbb N$ as the identity mapping on $N$ and view the remaining elements in $mathbb N$ as (proper) injections.



    Define the function $alpha$ on $mathbb N$ by $k mapsto k +1$.



    Theorem 5: $(mathbb N, 0, alpha)$ is a Peano system.

    Proof (sketch)

    Translating back to $mathcal C$, the identity fucntion can't have the form $sigma circ tau$, since $sigma$ can't have a left and right inverse. So $text{(1)}$ is satisfied. To show $text{(2)}$, you use induction on $N$ and theorem 1 and theorem 2 to show that there is 'complete coverage'. $quad blacksquare$



    The prior theorem is stating that $(mathbb N, 0, alpha)$ can be viewed as the 'dual Peano system' to $(N, 1, sigma)$.



    Theorem 6: For $z,x,y in mathbb N$, if $z + x = z + y$, then $x = y$.

    Proof

    Injective functions always have a left inverse. $quad blacksquare$



    Definition: For $m, n in mathbb N$, we write $m le n$ if there exist a $k in mathbb N$ such that $m + k = n$.



    Theorem 7: The relation $(mathbb N, le)$ is a total ordering.

    Proof (sketch)

    At all steps, when necessary invoke theorem 6 and use algebraic manipulations. Transitivity is straightforward. To show antisymmetry, use the fact that $m + n = 0$ implies that both $m$ and $n$ are equal to $0$. To show the connex property, use induction and split out the logic. $quad blacksquare$



    Theorem 8: Every nonempty subset of $mathbb N$ has a least element.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      Let $N$ be a set containing an element $1$ and $sigma: N to N$ an injective function satisfying the following two properties:



      $tag 1 1 notin sigma(N)$



      $tag 2 (forall M subset N) ;text{If } [; 1 in M land (sigma(M) subset M) ;] text{ Then } M = N$



      We call $(N, 1, sigma)$ a Peano system.



      The set of all injective functions on $N$ form a semigroup under composition.



      Let $mathcal C$ denote the set of all injective functions on $N$ that commute with $sigma$. It is easy to see that $mathcal C$ is a commutative semigroup containing the identity transformation.



      Theorem 1: If $mu,nu in mathcal C$ and $mu(1) = nu(1)$ then $mu = nu$.

      Proof

      Let $M$ be the set of all elements in $N$ where the two functions agree. Applying induction with $text{(2)}$, it is immediately evident that $M = N$. $quad blacksquare$



      Theorem 2: For any $m in N$, there exist a $mu in mathcal C$ such that $mu(1) = m$.

      Proof

      Again, simply apply induction. $quad blacksquare$



      So $mathcal C$ is in bijective correspondence with $N$.



      Theorem 3: Let $(N, sigma)$ and $(N', sigma')$ be two Peano systems and $mathcal C$ and $mathcal C'$ the corresponding semigroups. Then there exist one and only one bijective correspondence $beta: N to N'$ satisfying



      $tag 3 beta(1) = 1'$



      $tag 4 beta circ sigma = sigma' circ beta$



      Proof

      The function $beta$ is defined using recursion. Induction is used to show that $beta$ is injective. Induction is used to show that $beta$ is surjective. $quad blacksquare$



      Using the above an argument can be supplied to prove the following.



      Theorem 4: Let $(N, sigma)$ and $(N', sigma')$ be two Peano systems and $mathcal C$ and $mathcal C'$ the corresponding semigroups. Then the mapping $sigma mapsto sigma'$ can be extended to an algebraic isomorphism between $mathcal C$ and $mathcal C'$.



      We reserve the symbol $mathbb N$ to denote $mathcal C$ and use the symbol $+$ to denote the binary operation of composition.



      Using the axioms of $ZF$, the existence of Peano systems is no problem.



      I couldn't find this technique here or on wikipedia, prompting




      Is the theory described above coherent?




      If it is it would certainly appeal to students who like to see some 'motion/action' when studying mathematical constructions, say somebody born to be a functional analyst.





      Since there has been no feedback except for two upvotes, the theory is sound. So here we knock off the remaining properties of $(mathbb N,0,1,+)$ that we need to have under our belts. When this is competed, these properties will completely define the natural numbers under addition up to isomorphism.



      Note that when convenient, we can always regard $0 in mathbb N$ as the identity mapping on $N$ and view the remaining elements in $mathbb N$ as (proper) injections.



      Define the function $alpha$ on $mathbb N$ by $k mapsto k +1$.



      Theorem 5: $(mathbb N, 0, alpha)$ is a Peano system.

      Proof (sketch)

      Translating back to $mathcal C$, the identity fucntion can't have the form $sigma circ tau$, since $sigma$ can't have a left and right inverse. So $text{(1)}$ is satisfied. To show $text{(2)}$, you use induction on $N$ and theorem 1 and theorem 2 to show that there is 'complete coverage'. $quad blacksquare$



      The prior theorem is stating that $(mathbb N, 0, alpha)$ can be viewed as the 'dual Peano system' to $(N, 1, sigma)$.



      Theorem 6: For $z,x,y in mathbb N$, if $z + x = z + y$, then $x = y$.

      Proof

      Injective functions always have a left inverse. $quad blacksquare$



      Definition: For $m, n in mathbb N$, we write $m le n$ if there exist a $k in mathbb N$ such that $m + k = n$.



      Theorem 7: The relation $(mathbb N, le)$ is a total ordering.

      Proof (sketch)

      At all steps, when necessary invoke theorem 6 and use algebraic manipulations. Transitivity is straightforward. To show antisymmetry, use the fact that $m + n = 0$ implies that both $m$ and $n$ are equal to $0$. To show the connex property, use induction and split out the logic. $quad blacksquare$



      Theorem 8: Every nonempty subset of $mathbb N$ has a least element.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $N$ be a set containing an element $1$ and $sigma: N to N$ an injective function satisfying the following two properties:



      $tag 1 1 notin sigma(N)$



      $tag 2 (forall M subset N) ;text{If } [; 1 in M land (sigma(M) subset M) ;] text{ Then } M = N$



      We call $(N, 1, sigma)$ a Peano system.



      The set of all injective functions on $N$ form a semigroup under composition.



      Let $mathcal C$ denote the set of all injective functions on $N$ that commute with $sigma$. It is easy to see that $mathcal C$ is a commutative semigroup containing the identity transformation.



      Theorem 1: If $mu,nu in mathcal C$ and $mu(1) = nu(1)$ then $mu = nu$.

      Proof

      Let $M$ be the set of all elements in $N$ where the two functions agree. Applying induction with $text{(2)}$, it is immediately evident that $M = N$. $quad blacksquare$



      Theorem 2: For any $m in N$, there exist a $mu in mathcal C$ such that $mu(1) = m$.

      Proof

      Again, simply apply induction. $quad blacksquare$



      So $mathcal C$ is in bijective correspondence with $N$.



      Theorem 3: Let $(N, sigma)$ and $(N', sigma')$ be two Peano systems and $mathcal C$ and $mathcal C'$ the corresponding semigroups. Then there exist one and only one bijective correspondence $beta: N to N'$ satisfying



      $tag 3 beta(1) = 1'$



      $tag 4 beta circ sigma = sigma' circ beta$



      Proof

      The function $beta$ is defined using recursion. Induction is used to show that $beta$ is injective. Induction is used to show that $beta$ is surjective. $quad blacksquare$



      Using the above an argument can be supplied to prove the following.



      Theorem 4: Let $(N, sigma)$ and $(N', sigma')$ be two Peano systems and $mathcal C$ and $mathcal C'$ the corresponding semigroups. Then the mapping $sigma mapsto sigma'$ can be extended to an algebraic isomorphism between $mathcal C$ and $mathcal C'$.



      We reserve the symbol $mathbb N$ to denote $mathcal C$ and use the symbol $+$ to denote the binary operation of composition.



      Using the axioms of $ZF$, the existence of Peano systems is no problem.



      I couldn't find this technique here or on wikipedia, prompting




      Is the theory described above coherent?




      If it is it would certainly appeal to students who like to see some 'motion/action' when studying mathematical constructions, say somebody born to be a functional analyst.





      Since there has been no feedback except for two upvotes, the theory is sound. So here we knock off the remaining properties of $(mathbb N,0,1,+)$ that we need to have under our belts. When this is competed, these properties will completely define the natural numbers under addition up to isomorphism.



      Note that when convenient, we can always regard $0 in mathbb N$ as the identity mapping on $N$ and view the remaining elements in $mathbb N$ as (proper) injections.



      Define the function $alpha$ on $mathbb N$ by $k mapsto k +1$.



      Theorem 5: $(mathbb N, 0, alpha)$ is a Peano system.

      Proof (sketch)

      Translating back to $mathcal C$, the identity fucntion can't have the form $sigma circ tau$, since $sigma$ can't have a left and right inverse. So $text{(1)}$ is satisfied. To show $text{(2)}$, you use induction on $N$ and theorem 1 and theorem 2 to show that there is 'complete coverage'. $quad blacksquare$



      The prior theorem is stating that $(mathbb N, 0, alpha)$ can be viewed as the 'dual Peano system' to $(N, 1, sigma)$.



      Theorem 6: For $z,x,y in mathbb N$, if $z + x = z + y$, then $x = y$.

      Proof

      Injective functions always have a left inverse. $quad blacksquare$



      Definition: For $m, n in mathbb N$, we write $m le n$ if there exist a $k in mathbb N$ such that $m + k = n$.



      Theorem 7: The relation $(mathbb N, le)$ is a total ordering.

      Proof (sketch)

      At all steps, when necessary invoke theorem 6 and use algebraic manipulations. Transitivity is straightforward. To show antisymmetry, use the fact that $m + n = 0$ implies that both $m$ and $n$ are equal to $0$. To show the connex property, use induction and split out the logic. $quad blacksquare$



      Theorem 8: Every nonempty subset of $mathbb N$ has a least element.







      abstract-algebra proof-verification elementary-set-theory natural-numbers






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 18 '18 at 1:54







      CopyPasteIt

















      asked Dec 17 '18 at 15:36









      CopyPasteItCopyPasteIt

      4,2031628




      4,2031628






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044090%2fdefining-addition-of-natural-numbers-as-the-algebra-of-push-along-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044090%2fdefining-addition-of-natural-numbers-as-the-algebra-of-push-along-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bundesstraße 106

          Verónica Boquete

          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten