redhat 7 + How to stop systemctl service permanent
we are install some service on redhat 7
but for now we no need the service application anymore
is it possible to disable the start of the service?
I not mean to disable it on the next reboot
what we mean is to avoid starting the service , in spite service installed
rhel services systemctl
asked 6 hours ago
yaelyael
2,70122572
add a comment |
we are install some service on redhat 7
but for now we no need the service application anymore
is it possible to disable the start of the service?
I not mean to disable it on the next reboot
what we mean is to avoid starting the service , in spite service installed
rhel services systemctl
asked 6 hours ago
yaelyael
2,70122572
add a comment |
we are install some service on redhat 7
but for now we no need the service application anymore
is it possible to disable the start of the service?
I not mean to disable it on the next reboot
what we mean is to avoid starting the service , in spite service installed
rhel services systemctl
asked 6 hours ago
yaelyael
2,70122572
we are install some service on redhat 7
but for now we no need the service application anymore
is it possible to disable the start of the service?
I not mean to disable it on the next reboot
what we mean is to avoid starting the service , in spite service installed
rhel services systemctl
rhel services systemctl
asked 6 hours ago
yaelyael
2,70122572
asked 6 hours ago
yaelyael
2,70122572
asked 6 hours ago
yaelyael
2,70122572
asked 6 hours ago
yaelyael
2,70122572
asked 6 hours ago
yaelyael
2,70122572
2,70122572
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
systemctl disable servicename.
Running systemctl disable removes the symlink to the service in /etc/systemd/system/*.
From now on, that service won't start on boot anymore.
answered 6 hours ago
stevesteve
14.2k22552
add a comment |
There is also a stronger version of the disable command, which is mask. From the manual:
mask UNIT…
Mask one or more units, as specified on the command line. This will link these unit files to
/dev/null, making it impossible to start
them. This is a stronger version of disable, since it prohibits all
kinds of activation of the unit, including enablement and manual
activation. Use this option with care. This honors the--runtime
option to only mask temporarily until the next reboot of the system.
The--nowoption may be used to ensure that the units are also
stopped. This command expects valid unit names only, it does not
accept unit file paths.
While systemctl disable unit would prevent a unit from starting on the next boot, you could still start the unit manually. systemctl mask unit prevents the unit from being started either automatically or manually. It does so by overriding the unit file with a symlink to /dev/null.
Finally, the command to reverse the effects of mask is unmask: systemctl unmask unit.
answered 1 hour ago
HaxielHaxiel
3,1451920
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f506172%2fredhat-7-how-to-stop-systemctl-service-permanent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
systemctl disable servicename.
Running systemctl disable removes the symlink to the service in /etc/systemd/system/*.
From now on, that service won't start on boot anymore.
answered 6 hours ago
stevesteve
14.2k22552
add a comment |
systemctl disable servicename.
Running systemctl disable removes the symlink to the service in /etc/systemd/system/*.
From now on, that service won't start on boot anymore.
answered 6 hours ago
stevesteve
14.2k22552
add a comment |
systemctl disable servicename.
Running systemctl disable removes the symlink to the service in /etc/systemd/system/*.
From now on, that service won't start on boot anymore.
answered 6 hours ago
stevesteve
14.2k22552
systemctl disable servicename.
Running systemctl disable removes the symlink to the service in /etc/systemd/system/*.
From now on, that service won't start on boot anymore.
answered 6 hours ago
stevesteve
14.2k22552
answered 6 hours ago
stevesteve
14.2k22552
answered 6 hours ago
stevesteve
14.2k22552
answered 6 hours ago
stevesteve
14.2k22552
14.2k22552
add a comment |
add a comment |
There is also a stronger version of the disable command, which is mask. From the manual:
mask UNIT…
Mask one or more units, as specified on the command line. This will link these unit files to
/dev/null, making it impossible to start
them. This is a stronger version of disable, since it prohibits all
kinds of activation of the unit, including enablement and manual
activation. Use this option with care. This honors the--runtime
option to only mask temporarily until the next reboot of the system.
The--nowoption may be used to ensure that the units are also
stopped. This command expects valid unit names only, it does not
accept unit file paths.
While systemctl disable unit would prevent a unit from starting on the next boot, you could still start the unit manually. systemctl mask unit prevents the unit from being started either automatically or manually. It does so by overriding the unit file with a symlink to /dev/null.
Finally, the command to reverse the effects of mask is unmask: systemctl unmask unit.
answered 1 hour ago
HaxielHaxiel
3,1451920
add a comment |
There is also a stronger version of the disable command, which is mask. From the manual:
mask UNIT…
Mask one or more units, as specified on the command line. This will link these unit files to
/dev/null, making it impossible to start
them. This is a stronger version of disable, since it prohibits all
kinds of activation of the unit, including enablement and manual
activation. Use this option with care. This honors the--runtime
option to only mask temporarily until the next reboot of the system.
The--nowoption may be used to ensure that the units are also
stopped. This command expects valid unit names only, it does not
accept unit file paths.
While systemctl disable unit would prevent a unit from starting on the next boot, you could still start the unit manually. systemctl mask unit prevents the unit from being started either automatically or manually. It does so by overriding the unit file with a symlink to /dev/null.
Finally, the command to reverse the effects of mask is unmask: systemctl unmask unit.
answered 1 hour ago
HaxielHaxiel
3,1451920
add a comment |
There is also a stronger version of the disable command, which is mask. From the manual:
mask UNIT…
Mask one or more units, as specified on the command line. This will link these unit files to
/dev/null, making it impossible to start
them. This is a stronger version of disable, since it prohibits all
kinds of activation of the unit, including enablement and manual
activation. Use this option with care. This honors the--runtime
option to only mask temporarily until the next reboot of the system.
The--nowoption may be used to ensure that the units are also
stopped. This command expects valid unit names only, it does not
accept unit file paths.
While systemctl disable unit would prevent a unit from starting on the next boot, you could still start the unit manually. systemctl mask unit prevents the unit from being started either automatically or manually. It does so by overriding the unit file with a symlink to /dev/null.
Finally, the command to reverse the effects of mask is unmask: systemctl unmask unit.
answered 1 hour ago
HaxielHaxiel
3,1451920
There is also a stronger version of the disable command, which is mask. From the manual:
mask UNIT…
Mask one or more units, as specified on the command line. This will link these unit files to
/dev/null, making it impossible to start
them. This is a stronger version of disable, since it prohibits all
kinds of activation of the unit, including enablement and manual
activation. Use this option with care. This honors the--runtime
option to only mask temporarily until the next reboot of the system.
The--nowoption may be used to ensure that the units are also
stopped. This command expects valid unit names only, it does not
accept unit file paths.
While systemctl disable unit would prevent a unit from starting on the next boot, you could still start the unit manually. systemctl mask unit prevents the unit from being started either automatically or manually. It does so by overriding the unit file with a symlink to /dev/null.
Finally, the command to reverse the effects of mask is unmask: systemctl unmask unit.
answered 1 hour ago
HaxielHaxiel
3,1451920
answered 1 hour ago
HaxielHaxiel
3,1451920
answered 1 hour ago
HaxielHaxiel
3,1451920
answered 1 hour ago
HaxielHaxiel
3,1451920
3,1451920
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f506172%2fredhat-7-how-to-stop-systemctl-service-permanent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
