Primes and Riemann zeta function.












3












$begingroup$


Primes numbers and Riemann zeta function.



Question 1: Is there a proof of the infinitude of prime numbers using the Riemann Zeta function. Exboço could show me a proof of this where I could find it?



Question 2: What is the relationship of this function with the famous Riemann hypothesis?






number-theory analysis riemann-zeta







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    For 2, see this and this.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Dec 20 '11 at 16:07








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Q2: Which function? If zeta, of course, the RH is about the zeroes of the zeta function.
    $endgroup$
    – N. S.
    Dec 20 '11 at 16:08






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $zeta(1)= prod_{p {rm prime}} frac{1}{1- frac{1}{p}} = infty $ This guarantees that there are infinitely many primes... Also PNT is usually proven using properties of the RH..... Last but not least, if there would be finitely many primes then the Euler product would be finite, thus "convergent" everywhere... Which would imply many things known not to be true (for example that $zeta$ has no zero)...
    $endgroup$
    – N. S.
    Dec 20 '11 at 16:12












  • $begingroup$
    For 1, see this.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Dec 20 '11 at 16:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm sorry. I do not search for a tag on "Riemann-function Zenta." There execelentes answers in this tag.
    $endgroup$
    – MathOverview
    Dec 20 '11 at 16:30
















3












$begingroup$


Primes numbers and Riemann zeta function.



Question 1: Is there a proof of the infinitude of prime numbers using the Riemann Zeta function. Exboço could show me a proof of this where I could find it?



Question 2: What is the relationship of this function with the famous Riemann hypothesis?






number-theory analysis riemann-zeta







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    For 2, see this and this.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Dec 20 '11 at 16:07








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Q2: Which function? If zeta, of course, the RH is about the zeroes of the zeta function.
    $endgroup$
    – N. S.
    Dec 20 '11 at 16:08






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $zeta(1)= prod_{p {rm prime}} frac{1}{1- frac{1}{p}} = infty $ This guarantees that there are infinitely many primes... Also PNT is usually proven using properties of the RH..... Last but not least, if there would be finitely many primes then the Euler product would be finite, thus "convergent" everywhere... Which would imply many things known not to be true (for example that $zeta$ has no zero)...
    $endgroup$
    – N. S.
    Dec 20 '11 at 16:12












  • $begingroup$
    For 1, see this.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Dec 20 '11 at 16:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm sorry. I do not search for a tag on "Riemann-function Zenta." There execelentes answers in this tag.
    $endgroup$
    – MathOverview
    Dec 20 '11 at 16:30














3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


Primes numbers and Riemann zeta function.



Question 1: Is there a proof of the infinitude of prime numbers using the Riemann Zeta function. Exboço could show me a proof of this where I could find it?



Question 2: What is the relationship of this function with the famous Riemann hypothesis?






number-theory analysis riemann-zeta







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Primes numbers and Riemann zeta function.



Question 1: Is there a proof of the infinitude of prime numbers using the Riemann Zeta function. Exboço could show me a proof of this where I could find it?



Question 2: What is the relationship of this function with the famous Riemann hypothesis?






number-theory analysis riemann-zeta




number-theory analysis riemann-zeta






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 17 '18 at 12:27







MathOverview

















asked Dec 20 '11 at 16:04









MathOverviewMathOverview

8,94543164




8,94543164








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    For 2, see this and this.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Dec 20 '11 at 16:07








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Q2: Which function? If zeta, of course, the RH is about the zeroes of the zeta function.
    $endgroup$
    – N. S.
    Dec 20 '11 at 16:08






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $zeta(1)= prod_{p {rm prime}} frac{1}{1- frac{1}{p}} = infty $ This guarantees that there are infinitely many primes... Also PNT is usually proven using properties of the RH..... Last but not least, if there would be finitely many primes then the Euler product would be finite, thus "convergent" everywhere... Which would imply many things known not to be true (for example that $zeta$ has no zero)...
    $endgroup$
    – N. S.
    Dec 20 '11 at 16:12












  • $begingroup$
    For 1, see this.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Dec 20 '11 at 16:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm sorry. I do not search for a tag on "Riemann-function Zenta." There execelentes answers in this tag.
    $endgroup$
    – MathOverview
    Dec 20 '11 at 16:30














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    For 2, see this and this.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Dec 20 '11 at 16:07








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Q2: Which function? If zeta, of course, the RH is about the zeroes of the zeta function.
    $endgroup$
    – N. S.
    Dec 20 '11 at 16:08






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $zeta(1)= prod_{p {rm prime}} frac{1}{1- frac{1}{p}} = infty $ This guarantees that there are infinitely many primes... Also PNT is usually proven using properties of the RH..... Last but not least, if there would be finitely many primes then the Euler product would be finite, thus "convergent" everywhere... Which would imply many things known not to be true (for example that $zeta$ has no zero)...
    $endgroup$
    – N. S.
    Dec 20 '11 at 16:12












  • $begingroup$
    For 1, see this.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Dec 20 '11 at 16:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm sorry. I do not search for a tag on "Riemann-function Zenta." There execelentes answers in this tag.
    $endgroup$
    – MathOverview
    Dec 20 '11 at 16:30








2




2




$begingroup$
For 2, see this and this.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Dec 20 '11 at 16:07






$begingroup$
For 2, see this and this.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Dec 20 '11 at 16:07






2




2




$begingroup$
Q2: Which function? If zeta, of course, the RH is about the zeroes of the zeta function.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Dec 20 '11 at 16:08




$begingroup$
Q2: Which function? If zeta, of course, the RH is about the zeroes of the zeta function.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Dec 20 '11 at 16:08




2




2




$begingroup$
$zeta(1)= prod_{p {rm prime}} frac{1}{1- frac{1}{p}} = infty $ This guarantees that there are infinitely many primes... Also PNT is usually proven using properties of the RH..... Last but not least, if there would be finitely many primes then the Euler product would be finite, thus "convergent" everywhere... Which would imply many things known not to be true (for example that $zeta$ has no zero)...
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Dec 20 '11 at 16:12






$begingroup$
$zeta(1)= prod_{p {rm prime}} frac{1}{1- frac{1}{p}} = infty $ This guarantees that there are infinitely many primes... Also PNT is usually proven using properties of the RH..... Last but not least, if there would be finitely many primes then the Euler product would be finite, thus "convergent" everywhere... Which would imply many things known not to be true (for example that $zeta$ has no zero)...
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Dec 20 '11 at 16:12














$begingroup$
For 1, see this.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Dec 20 '11 at 16:13




$begingroup$
For 1, see this.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Dec 20 '11 at 16:13




1




1




$begingroup$
I'm sorry. I do not search for a tag on "Riemann-function Zenta." There execelentes answers in this tag.
$endgroup$
– MathOverview
Dec 20 '11 at 16:30




$begingroup$
I'm sorry. I do not search for a tag on "Riemann-function Zenta." There execelentes answers in this tag.
$endgroup$
– MathOverview
Dec 20 '11 at 16:30










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

It is easy to lose track of the Riemann Hypothesis behind all the noise about the Riemann Hypothesis. But following the usual statement of the problem (where I use the Clay Mathematics Institute and their prize as the usual statement), the hypothesis is that all the zeroes of the Riemann Zeta function occur on the line $Re(s) = 1/2$.



With respect to your first question, the Riemann Zeta Function is traditionally used in one proof of the Prime Number Theorem (which states the asymptotic density of primes). In this way, it gives that there are infinitely many primes.



Alternatively, as pointed out by N.S. in the comments, the fact that $zeta(1) = infty$ is a direct statement that there are infinitely many primes. And 'calculating' this is not so bad, as long as you know that the harmonic series diverges and that $sumlimits frac{1}{n} = prod_p frac{1}{1 - p^{-1}}$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f92976%2fprimes-and-riemann-zeta-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    It is easy to lose track of the Riemann Hypothesis behind all the noise about the Riemann Hypothesis. But following the usual statement of the problem (where I use the Clay Mathematics Institute and their prize as the usual statement), the hypothesis is that all the zeroes of the Riemann Zeta function occur on the line $Re(s) = 1/2$.



    With respect to your first question, the Riemann Zeta Function is traditionally used in one proof of the Prime Number Theorem (which states the asymptotic density of primes). In this way, it gives that there are infinitely many primes.



    Alternatively, as pointed out by N.S. in the comments, the fact that $zeta(1) = infty$ is a direct statement that there are infinitely many primes. And 'calculating' this is not so bad, as long as you know that the harmonic series diverges and that $sumlimits frac{1}{n} = prod_p frac{1}{1 - p^{-1}}$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      4












      $begingroup$

      It is easy to lose track of the Riemann Hypothesis behind all the noise about the Riemann Hypothesis. But following the usual statement of the problem (where I use the Clay Mathematics Institute and their prize as the usual statement), the hypothesis is that all the zeroes of the Riemann Zeta function occur on the line $Re(s) = 1/2$.



      With respect to your first question, the Riemann Zeta Function is traditionally used in one proof of the Prime Number Theorem (which states the asymptotic density of primes). In this way, it gives that there are infinitely many primes.



      Alternatively, as pointed out by N.S. in the comments, the fact that $zeta(1) = infty$ is a direct statement that there are infinitely many primes. And 'calculating' this is not so bad, as long as you know that the harmonic series diverges and that $sumlimits frac{1}{n} = prod_p frac{1}{1 - p^{-1}}$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        It is easy to lose track of the Riemann Hypothesis behind all the noise about the Riemann Hypothesis. But following the usual statement of the problem (where I use the Clay Mathematics Institute and their prize as the usual statement), the hypothesis is that all the zeroes of the Riemann Zeta function occur on the line $Re(s) = 1/2$.



        With respect to your first question, the Riemann Zeta Function is traditionally used in one proof of the Prime Number Theorem (which states the asymptotic density of primes). In this way, it gives that there are infinitely many primes.



        Alternatively, as pointed out by N.S. in the comments, the fact that $zeta(1) = infty$ is a direct statement that there are infinitely many primes. And 'calculating' this is not so bad, as long as you know that the harmonic series diverges and that $sumlimits frac{1}{n} = prod_p frac{1}{1 - p^{-1}}$.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        It is easy to lose track of the Riemann Hypothesis behind all the noise about the Riemann Hypothesis. But following the usual statement of the problem (where I use the Clay Mathematics Institute and their prize as the usual statement), the hypothesis is that all the zeroes of the Riemann Zeta function occur on the line $Re(s) = 1/2$.



        With respect to your first question, the Riemann Zeta Function is traditionally used in one proof of the Prime Number Theorem (which states the asymptotic density of primes). In this way, it gives that there are infinitely many primes.



        Alternatively, as pointed out by N.S. in the comments, the fact that $zeta(1) = infty$ is a direct statement that there are infinitely many primes. And 'calculating' this is not so bad, as long as you know that the harmonic series diverges and that $sumlimits frac{1}{n} = prod_p frac{1}{1 - p^{-1}}$.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 22 '11 at 1:23









        J. M. is not a mathematician

        61.4k5152290




        61.4k5152290










        answered Dec 21 '11 at 22:26









        davidlowryduda♦davidlowryduda

        75k7120256




        75k7120256






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f92976%2fprimes-and-riemann-zeta-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Image
            Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück
            Read more

            Verónica Boquete

            Image
            Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl
            Read more

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

            Image
            Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich
            Read more