Does every subgroup of finite index contain a power of each element of the group?












6












$begingroup$


Let $G$ be a group, not necessarily finite. If $H$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ of a finite index, say $(G:H)=n$, then for every $gin G$ we have $g^nin H$. Does this statement remain valid if do not assume $H$ to be normal?



In particular let $SL_2(mathbb Z)$ be the modular group, and let $Gammasubset SL_2(mathbb Z)$ be a subgroup of a finite index. Does there exists a positive integer $ell$ such that $begin{pmatrix}1&1\0 & 1end{pmatrix}^ell$ lies in $Gamma$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You'll find that simple "Here's the statement of my question, solve it for me" posts will be poorly received. What is better is for you to add context (with an edit): What you understand about the problem, what you've tried so far, etc.; something both to show you are part of the learning experience and to help us guide you to the appropriate help. You can consult this link for further guidance.
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Dec 18 '18 at 17:26
















6












$begingroup$


Let $G$ be a group, not necessarily finite. If $H$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ of a finite index, say $(G:H)=n$, then for every $gin G$ we have $g^nin H$. Does this statement remain valid if do not assume $H$ to be normal?



In particular let $SL_2(mathbb Z)$ be the modular group, and let $Gammasubset SL_2(mathbb Z)$ be a subgroup of a finite index. Does there exists a positive integer $ell$ such that $begin{pmatrix}1&1\0 & 1end{pmatrix}^ell$ lies in $Gamma$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You'll find that simple "Here's the statement of my question, solve it for me" posts will be poorly received. What is better is for you to add context (with an edit): What you understand about the problem, what you've tried so far, etc.; something both to show you are part of the learning experience and to help us guide you to the appropriate help. You can consult this link for further guidance.
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Dec 18 '18 at 17:26














6












6








6


2



$begingroup$


Let $G$ be a group, not necessarily finite. If $H$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ of a finite index, say $(G:H)=n$, then for every $gin G$ we have $g^nin H$. Does this statement remain valid if do not assume $H$ to be normal?



In particular let $SL_2(mathbb Z)$ be the modular group, and let $Gammasubset SL_2(mathbb Z)$ be a subgroup of a finite index. Does there exists a positive integer $ell$ such that $begin{pmatrix}1&1\0 & 1end{pmatrix}^ell$ lies in $Gamma$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $G$ be a group, not necessarily finite. If $H$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ of a finite index, say $(G:H)=n$, then for every $gin G$ we have $g^nin H$. Does this statement remain valid if do not assume $H$ to be normal?



In particular let $SL_2(mathbb Z)$ be the modular group, and let $Gammasubset SL_2(mathbb Z)$ be a subgroup of a finite index. Does there exists a positive integer $ell$ such that $begin{pmatrix}1&1\0 & 1end{pmatrix}^ell$ lies in $Gamma$?







group-theory modular-group






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 18 '18 at 17:10









ShimrodShimrod

23229




23229












  • $begingroup$
    You'll find that simple "Here's the statement of my question, solve it for me" posts will be poorly received. What is better is for you to add context (with an edit): What you understand about the problem, what you've tried so far, etc.; something both to show you are part of the learning experience and to help us guide you to the appropriate help. You can consult this link for further guidance.
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Dec 18 '18 at 17:26


















  • $begingroup$
    You'll find that simple "Here's the statement of my question, solve it for me" posts will be poorly received. What is better is for you to add context (with an edit): What you understand about the problem, what you've tried so far, etc.; something both to show you are part of the learning experience and to help us guide you to the appropriate help. You can consult this link for further guidance.
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Dec 18 '18 at 17:26
















$begingroup$
You'll find that simple "Here's the statement of my question, solve it for me" posts will be poorly received. What is better is for you to add context (with an edit): What you understand about the problem, what you've tried so far, etc.; something both to show you are part of the learning experience and to help us guide you to the appropriate help. You can consult this link for further guidance.
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Dec 18 '18 at 17:26




$begingroup$
You'll find that simple "Here's the statement of my question, solve it for me" posts will be poorly received. What is better is for you to add context (with an edit): What you understand about the problem, what you've tried so far, etc.; something both to show you are part of the learning experience and to help us guide you to the appropriate help. You can consult this link for further guidance.
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Dec 18 '18 at 17:26










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















9












$begingroup$

Yes.



The set ${ H, gH, g^2H, dots , g^nH }$ has $n+1$ elements, so that two of them are equal ( $H$ has only $n$ right cosets).



From $$g^aH=g^bH$$
it follows that $g^{a-b} in H$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    3












    $begingroup$

    For another proof (though it only answers the title as the $n$ we get is not $[G:H]$)



    Let $H$ be a finite index subgroup. Then $G$ acts on $G/H$ by left translation, and so we have a morphism $rho : Gto mathfrak{S}G/H$.



    Its kernel $K$ is contained in $H$ : indeed if $xin K$, then $H= rho(x)(H)= xH$, so $xin H$. Moreover, $K$ is normal (it's a kernel !), and it has finite index in $G$ (because $G/Ksimeq mathrm{Im}rho subset mathfrak{S}G/Hsimeq mathfrak{S}_{|G/H|}$).



    Thus if $xin G, x^nin K$ for some $n$, thus $x^nin H$ for some $n$. Note, however, that $n$ is not necessarily $[G:H]$; and the proof I gave only gives the bound $[G:H]!$ for $n=[G:K]$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      It's odd how the symbol/rendering of $mathfrak{S}$ (i.e., $mathfrak{S}$) looks like a $G$.
      $endgroup$
      – Shaun
      Dec 18 '18 at 17:29






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Shaun : that's just the gothic S. It's also easy to see how to deform an S into an $mathfrak{S}$: stretch the bottom part and take it up above the rest of the S, then retract the top part a bit, and finally straighten the curve
      $endgroup$
      – Max
      Dec 18 '18 at 17:41











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045416%2fdoes-every-subgroup-of-finite-index-contain-a-power-of-each-element-of-the-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    9












    $begingroup$

    Yes.



    The set ${ H, gH, g^2H, dots , g^nH }$ has $n+1$ elements, so that two of them are equal ( $H$ has only $n$ right cosets).



    From $$g^aH=g^bH$$
    it follows that $g^{a-b} in H$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      9












      $begingroup$

      Yes.



      The set ${ H, gH, g^2H, dots , g^nH }$ has $n+1$ elements, so that two of them are equal ( $H$ has only $n$ right cosets).



      From $$g^aH=g^bH$$
      it follows that $g^{a-b} in H$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        9












        9








        9





        $begingroup$

        Yes.



        The set ${ H, gH, g^2H, dots , g^nH }$ has $n+1$ elements, so that two of them are equal ( $H$ has only $n$ right cosets).



        From $$g^aH=g^bH$$
        it follows that $g^{a-b} in H$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Yes.



        The set ${ H, gH, g^2H, dots , g^nH }$ has $n+1$ elements, so that two of them are equal ( $H$ has only $n$ right cosets).



        From $$g^aH=g^bH$$
        it follows that $g^{a-b} in H$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 18 '18 at 17:15









        CrostulCrostul

        28.2k22352




        28.2k22352























            3












            $begingroup$

            For another proof (though it only answers the title as the $n$ we get is not $[G:H]$)



            Let $H$ be a finite index subgroup. Then $G$ acts on $G/H$ by left translation, and so we have a morphism $rho : Gto mathfrak{S}G/H$.



            Its kernel $K$ is contained in $H$ : indeed if $xin K$, then $H= rho(x)(H)= xH$, so $xin H$. Moreover, $K$ is normal (it's a kernel !), and it has finite index in $G$ (because $G/Ksimeq mathrm{Im}rho subset mathfrak{S}G/Hsimeq mathfrak{S}_{|G/H|}$).



            Thus if $xin G, x^nin K$ for some $n$, thus $x^nin H$ for some $n$. Note, however, that $n$ is not necessarily $[G:H]$; and the proof I gave only gives the bound $[G:H]!$ for $n=[G:K]$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              It's odd how the symbol/rendering of $mathfrak{S}$ (i.e., $mathfrak{S}$) looks like a $G$.
              $endgroup$
              – Shaun
              Dec 18 '18 at 17:29






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              @Shaun : that's just the gothic S. It's also easy to see how to deform an S into an $mathfrak{S}$: stretch the bottom part and take it up above the rest of the S, then retract the top part a bit, and finally straighten the curve
              $endgroup$
              – Max
              Dec 18 '18 at 17:41
















            3












            $begingroup$

            For another proof (though it only answers the title as the $n$ we get is not $[G:H]$)



            Let $H$ be a finite index subgroup. Then $G$ acts on $G/H$ by left translation, and so we have a morphism $rho : Gto mathfrak{S}G/H$.



            Its kernel $K$ is contained in $H$ : indeed if $xin K$, then $H= rho(x)(H)= xH$, so $xin H$. Moreover, $K$ is normal (it's a kernel !), and it has finite index in $G$ (because $G/Ksimeq mathrm{Im}rho subset mathfrak{S}G/Hsimeq mathfrak{S}_{|G/H|}$).



            Thus if $xin G, x^nin K$ for some $n$, thus $x^nin H$ for some $n$. Note, however, that $n$ is not necessarily $[G:H]$; and the proof I gave only gives the bound $[G:H]!$ for $n=[G:K]$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              It's odd how the symbol/rendering of $mathfrak{S}$ (i.e., $mathfrak{S}$) looks like a $G$.
              $endgroup$
              – Shaun
              Dec 18 '18 at 17:29






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              @Shaun : that's just the gothic S. It's also easy to see how to deform an S into an $mathfrak{S}$: stretch the bottom part and take it up above the rest of the S, then retract the top part a bit, and finally straighten the curve
              $endgroup$
              – Max
              Dec 18 '18 at 17:41














            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            For another proof (though it only answers the title as the $n$ we get is not $[G:H]$)



            Let $H$ be a finite index subgroup. Then $G$ acts on $G/H$ by left translation, and so we have a morphism $rho : Gto mathfrak{S}G/H$.



            Its kernel $K$ is contained in $H$ : indeed if $xin K$, then $H= rho(x)(H)= xH$, so $xin H$. Moreover, $K$ is normal (it's a kernel !), and it has finite index in $G$ (because $G/Ksimeq mathrm{Im}rho subset mathfrak{S}G/Hsimeq mathfrak{S}_{|G/H|}$).



            Thus if $xin G, x^nin K$ for some $n$, thus $x^nin H$ for some $n$. Note, however, that $n$ is not necessarily $[G:H]$; and the proof I gave only gives the bound $[G:H]!$ for $n=[G:K]$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            For another proof (though it only answers the title as the $n$ we get is not $[G:H]$)



            Let $H$ be a finite index subgroup. Then $G$ acts on $G/H$ by left translation, and so we have a morphism $rho : Gto mathfrak{S}G/H$.



            Its kernel $K$ is contained in $H$ : indeed if $xin K$, then $H= rho(x)(H)= xH$, so $xin H$. Moreover, $K$ is normal (it's a kernel !), and it has finite index in $G$ (because $G/Ksimeq mathrm{Im}rho subset mathfrak{S}G/Hsimeq mathfrak{S}_{|G/H|}$).



            Thus if $xin G, x^nin K$ for some $n$, thus $x^nin H$ for some $n$. Note, however, that $n$ is not necessarily $[G:H]$; and the proof I gave only gives the bound $[G:H]!$ for $n=[G:K]$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Dec 18 '18 at 17:19









            MaxMax

            15.3k11143




            15.3k11143












            • $begingroup$
              It's odd how the symbol/rendering of $mathfrak{S}$ (i.e., $mathfrak{S}$) looks like a $G$.
              $endgroup$
              – Shaun
              Dec 18 '18 at 17:29






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              @Shaun : that's just the gothic S. It's also easy to see how to deform an S into an $mathfrak{S}$: stretch the bottom part and take it up above the rest of the S, then retract the top part a bit, and finally straighten the curve
              $endgroup$
              – Max
              Dec 18 '18 at 17:41


















            • $begingroup$
              It's odd how the symbol/rendering of $mathfrak{S}$ (i.e., $mathfrak{S}$) looks like a $G$.
              $endgroup$
              – Shaun
              Dec 18 '18 at 17:29






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              @Shaun : that's just the gothic S. It's also easy to see how to deform an S into an $mathfrak{S}$: stretch the bottom part and take it up above the rest of the S, then retract the top part a bit, and finally straighten the curve
              $endgroup$
              – Max
              Dec 18 '18 at 17:41
















            $begingroup$
            It's odd how the symbol/rendering of $mathfrak{S}$ (i.e., $mathfrak{S}$) looks like a $G$.
            $endgroup$
            – Shaun
            Dec 18 '18 at 17:29




            $begingroup$
            It's odd how the symbol/rendering of $mathfrak{S}$ (i.e., $mathfrak{S}$) looks like a $G$.
            $endgroup$
            – Shaun
            Dec 18 '18 at 17:29




            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            @Shaun : that's just the gothic S. It's also easy to see how to deform an S into an $mathfrak{S}$: stretch the bottom part and take it up above the rest of the S, then retract the top part a bit, and finally straighten the curve
            $endgroup$
            – Max
            Dec 18 '18 at 17:41




            $begingroup$
            @Shaun : that's just the gothic S. It's also easy to see how to deform an S into an $mathfrak{S}$: stretch the bottom part and take it up above the rest of the S, then retract the top part a bit, and finally straighten the curve
            $endgroup$
            – Max
            Dec 18 '18 at 17:41


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045416%2fdoes-every-subgroup-of-finite-index-contain-a-power-of-each-element-of-the-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Verónica Boquete

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten