Find the probability that “At least one person…” with multiple variables.












0












$begingroup$


I have a statistics problem and, although I have solved most of it, I am stuck for quite some time in the last question.




Say that there we have a population where the analogy of men to women is θ. Suppose that the probability of a woman being colorblind is $q^2$ and the probability of a man being colorblinf $q$.




Up to now I have found, if choosing one random person, the probability of him/her being colorblind and also that probability of a person being a man, given that he is colorblind. However, now I can't find a way to approach this question:




Suppose we choose two people out of the population radomly. What is the probability that at least one person is colorblind?




I was thinking of approaching it by finding the probability of none being colorblind and then finding its compliment, but I can't figure out how to do this, given that we have a different percentage for men and women. Any help on this would be appreciated.
Thank you!






probability statistics conditional-probability bayes-theorem







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    To be clear, there are $theta$ men for every $1$ woman, correct?
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:20






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, what I mean is P(A)/ P(A') = θ , where A is that the subject is male. (So I guess, men/women= θ)
    $endgroup$
    – butterflyflyaway
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:22










  • $begingroup$
    Condition the complement of your event on the number of females sampled: 0, 1, or 2.
    $endgroup$
    – Laars Helenius
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:26










  • $begingroup$
    Why only on females though?
    $endgroup$
    – butterflyflyaway
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:27
















0












$begingroup$


I have a statistics problem and, although I have solved most of it, I am stuck for quite some time in the last question.




Say that there we have a population where the analogy of men to women is θ. Suppose that the probability of a woman being colorblind is $q^2$ and the probability of a man being colorblinf $q$.




Up to now I have found, if choosing one random person, the probability of him/her being colorblind and also that probability of a person being a man, given that he is colorblind. However, now I can't find a way to approach this question:




Suppose we choose two people out of the population radomly. What is the probability that at least one person is colorblind?




I was thinking of approaching it by finding the probability of none being colorblind and then finding its compliment, but I can't figure out how to do this, given that we have a different percentage for men and women. Any help on this would be appreciated.
Thank you!






probability statistics conditional-probability bayes-theorem







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    To be clear, there are $theta$ men for every $1$ woman, correct?
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:20






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, what I mean is P(A)/ P(A') = θ , where A is that the subject is male. (So I guess, men/women= θ)
    $endgroup$
    – butterflyflyaway
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:22










  • $begingroup$
    Condition the complement of your event on the number of females sampled: 0, 1, or 2.
    $endgroup$
    – Laars Helenius
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:26










  • $begingroup$
    Why only on females though?
    $endgroup$
    – butterflyflyaway
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:27














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I have a statistics problem and, although I have solved most of it, I am stuck for quite some time in the last question.




Say that there we have a population where the analogy of men to women is θ. Suppose that the probability of a woman being colorblind is $q^2$ and the probability of a man being colorblinf $q$.




Up to now I have found, if choosing one random person, the probability of him/her being colorblind and also that probability of a person being a man, given that he is colorblind. However, now I can't find a way to approach this question:




Suppose we choose two people out of the population radomly. What is the probability that at least one person is colorblind?




I was thinking of approaching it by finding the probability of none being colorblind and then finding its compliment, but I can't figure out how to do this, given that we have a different percentage for men and women. Any help on this would be appreciated.
Thank you!






probability statistics conditional-probability bayes-theorem







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I have a statistics problem and, although I have solved most of it, I am stuck for quite some time in the last question.




Say that there we have a population where the analogy of men to women is θ. Suppose that the probability of a woman being colorblind is $q^2$ and the probability of a man being colorblinf $q$.




Up to now I have found, if choosing one random person, the probability of him/her being colorblind and also that probability of a person being a man, given that he is colorblind. However, now I can't find a way to approach this question:




Suppose we choose two people out of the population radomly. What is the probability that at least one person is colorblind?




I was thinking of approaching it by finding the probability of none being colorblind and then finding its compliment, but I can't figure out how to do this, given that we have a different percentage for men and women. Any help on this would be appreciated.
Thank you!






probability statistics conditional-probability bayes-theorem




probability statistics conditional-probability bayes-theorem






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 28 '18 at 22:17









butterflyflyawaybutterflyflyaway

133




133












  • $begingroup$
    To be clear, there are $theta$ men for every $1$ woman, correct?
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:20






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, what I mean is P(A)/ P(A') = θ , where A is that the subject is male. (So I guess, men/women= θ)
    $endgroup$
    – butterflyflyaway
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:22










  • $begingroup$
    Condition the complement of your event on the number of females sampled: 0, 1, or 2.
    $endgroup$
    – Laars Helenius
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:26










  • $begingroup$
    Why only on females though?
    $endgroup$
    – butterflyflyaway
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:27


















  • $begingroup$
    To be clear, there are $theta$ men for every $1$ woman, correct?
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:20






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, what I mean is P(A)/ P(A') = θ , where A is that the subject is male. (So I guess, men/women= θ)
    $endgroup$
    – butterflyflyaway
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:22










  • $begingroup$
    Condition the complement of your event on the number of females sampled: 0, 1, or 2.
    $endgroup$
    – Laars Helenius
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:26










  • $begingroup$
    Why only on females though?
    $endgroup$
    – butterflyflyaway
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:27
















$begingroup$
To be clear, there are $theta$ men for every $1$ woman, correct?
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Dec 28 '18 at 22:20




$begingroup$
To be clear, there are $theta$ men for every $1$ woman, correct?
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Dec 28 '18 at 22:20




1




1




$begingroup$
No, what I mean is P(A)/ P(A') = θ , where A is that the subject is male. (So I guess, men/women= θ)
$endgroup$
– butterflyflyaway
Dec 28 '18 at 22:22




$begingroup$
No, what I mean is P(A)/ P(A') = θ , where A is that the subject is male. (So I guess, men/women= θ)
$endgroup$
– butterflyflyaway
Dec 28 '18 at 22:22












$begingroup$
Condition the complement of your event on the number of females sampled: 0, 1, or 2.
$endgroup$
– Laars Helenius
Dec 28 '18 at 22:26




$begingroup$
Condition the complement of your event on the number of females sampled: 0, 1, or 2.
$endgroup$
– Laars Helenius
Dec 28 '18 at 22:26












$begingroup$
Why only on females though?
$endgroup$
– butterflyflyaway
Dec 28 '18 at 22:27




$begingroup$
Why only on females though?
$endgroup$
– butterflyflyaway
Dec 28 '18 at 22:27










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Let there be $m$ men and $w$ women (unfortunately, I also have to assume there are also $0$ non-binary people in this population). We have the following:



$$frac m w=thetarightarrow m=theta w$$



Thus, the probabilities of being a man or a woman are:



$$P(man)=frac{m}{m+w}=frac{theta w}{theta w+w}=frac{theta}{theta+1}$$
$$P(woman)=frac{w}{m+w}=frac{w}{theta w+w}=frac{1}{theta+1}$$



Now, we are also given the following:



$$P(colorblind | man)=q^2$$
$$P(colorblind | woman)=q$$



Then, we can use the formula $P(A cap B)=P(B)P(A|B)$ to find the following:



$$P(colorblind cap man)=P(man)P(colorblind | man)=frac{q^2theta}{theta+1}$$
$$P(colorblind cap woman)=P(woman)P(colorblind | woman)=frac{q}{theta+1}$$



Finally, since man and woman are the only two cases in this population, $woman=man^C$—that is, woman is the complement case of man. Thus, we can use the formula $P(A)=P(A cap B)+P(A cap B^C)$ to find:



$$P(colorblind)=P(colorblind cap man)+P(colorblind cap woman)=frac{q^2theta+q}{theta+1}$$



And of course, to find the probability is not colorblind, we use $P(A^C)=1-P(A)$:



$$P(colorblind^C)=1-P(colorblind)=frac{(1-q^2)theta+1-q}{theta+1}$$



Now, the probability that at least one person is colorblind has three cases in it:




  • Both people are colorblind -> $P(colorblind)^2$

  • First person is colorblind, second person is not -> $P(colorblind)cdot P(colorblind^C)$

  • Second person is colorblind, first person is not -> $P(colorblind)cdot P(colorblind^C)$


Thus, to find the total probability of there being one color blind person, we just add up all of these cases:



$$P(at least one colorblind)=P(colorblind)^2+2P(colorblind)cdot P(colorblind^C) \=frac{(q^2theta+q)^2+2(q^2theta+q)(theta(1-q^2)+1-q)}{(theta+1)^2}$$



I'll leave doing the algebra to you. Good luck!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    To complete the problem, assume the sampling is independent. Then $P(text{at least one colorblind})=1-P(text{not colorblind})^2=1-[1-P(text{colorblind})]^2$
    $endgroup$
    – M. Nestor
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:31












  • $begingroup$
    One more question. This was the answer that I found when I was picking one person and finding the probability of whether he/she is colorblind. So, it remains the same even after I choose two people?
    $endgroup$
    – butterflyflyaway
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:33










  • $begingroup$
    @butterflyflyaway Sorry, see my new edited answer for the actual, final answer of the probability of at least one person being color blind.
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:36










  • $begingroup$
    @M.Nestor This is a valid solution, but it is equivalent to $1-(1-p)^2=1-(p^2+1-2p)=2p-p^2=p^2+2p-2p^2=p^2+2p(1-p)$, which is what I did.
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:38












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055343%2ffind-the-probability-that-at-least-one-person-with-multiple-variables%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

Let there be $m$ men and $w$ women (unfortunately, I also have to assume there are also $0$ non-binary people in this population). We have the following:



$$frac m w=thetarightarrow m=theta w$$



Thus, the probabilities of being a man or a woman are:



$$P(man)=frac{m}{m+w}=frac{theta w}{theta w+w}=frac{theta}{theta+1}$$
$$P(woman)=frac{w}{m+w}=frac{w}{theta w+w}=frac{1}{theta+1}$$



Now, we are also given the following:



$$P(colorblind | man)=q^2$$
$$P(colorblind | woman)=q$$



Then, we can use the formula $P(A cap B)=P(B)P(A|B)$ to find the following:



$$P(colorblind cap man)=P(man)P(colorblind | man)=frac{q^2theta}{theta+1}$$
$$P(colorblind cap woman)=P(woman)P(colorblind | woman)=frac{q}{theta+1}$$



Finally, since man and woman are the only two cases in this population, $woman=man^C$—that is, woman is the complement case of man. Thus, we can use the formula $P(A)=P(A cap B)+P(A cap B^C)$ to find:



$$P(colorblind)=P(colorblind cap man)+P(colorblind cap woman)=frac{q^2theta+q}{theta+1}$$



And of course, to find the probability is not colorblind, we use $P(A^C)=1-P(A)$:



$$P(colorblind^C)=1-P(colorblind)=frac{(1-q^2)theta+1-q}{theta+1}$$



Now, the probability that at least one person is colorblind has three cases in it:




  • Both people are colorblind -> $P(colorblind)^2$

  • First person is colorblind, second person is not -> $P(colorblind)cdot P(colorblind^C)$

  • Second person is colorblind, first person is not -> $P(colorblind)cdot P(colorblind^C)$


Thus, to find the total probability of there being one color blind person, we just add up all of these cases:



$$P(at least one colorblind)=P(colorblind)^2+2P(colorblind)cdot P(colorblind^C) \=frac{(q^2theta+q)^2+2(q^2theta+q)(theta(1-q^2)+1-q)}{(theta+1)^2}$$



I'll leave doing the algebra to you. Good luck!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    To complete the problem, assume the sampling is independent. Then $P(text{at least one colorblind})=1-P(text{not colorblind})^2=1-[1-P(text{colorblind})]^2$
    $endgroup$
    – M. Nestor
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:31












  • $begingroup$
    One more question. This was the answer that I found when I was picking one person and finding the probability of whether he/she is colorblind. So, it remains the same even after I choose two people?
    $endgroup$
    – butterflyflyaway
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:33










  • $begingroup$
    @butterflyflyaway Sorry, see my new edited answer for the actual, final answer of the probability of at least one person being color blind.
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:36










  • $begingroup$
    @M.Nestor This is a valid solution, but it is equivalent to $1-(1-p)^2=1-(p^2+1-2p)=2p-p^2=p^2+2p-2p^2=p^2+2p(1-p)$, which is what I did.
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:38
















2












$begingroup$

Let there be $m$ men and $w$ women (unfortunately, I also have to assume there are also $0$ non-binary people in this population). We have the following:



$$frac m w=thetarightarrow m=theta w$$



Thus, the probabilities of being a man or a woman are:



$$P(man)=frac{m}{m+w}=frac{theta w}{theta w+w}=frac{theta}{theta+1}$$
$$P(woman)=frac{w}{m+w}=frac{w}{theta w+w}=frac{1}{theta+1}$$



Now, we are also given the following:



$$P(colorblind | man)=q^2$$
$$P(colorblind | woman)=q$$



Then, we can use the formula $P(A cap B)=P(B)P(A|B)$ to find the following:



$$P(colorblind cap man)=P(man)P(colorblind | man)=frac{q^2theta}{theta+1}$$
$$P(colorblind cap woman)=P(woman)P(colorblind | woman)=frac{q}{theta+1}$$



Finally, since man and woman are the only two cases in this population, $woman=man^C$—that is, woman is the complement case of man. Thus, we can use the formula $P(A)=P(A cap B)+P(A cap B^C)$ to find:



$$P(colorblind)=P(colorblind cap man)+P(colorblind cap woman)=frac{q^2theta+q}{theta+1}$$



And of course, to find the probability is not colorblind, we use $P(A^C)=1-P(A)$:



$$P(colorblind^C)=1-P(colorblind)=frac{(1-q^2)theta+1-q}{theta+1}$$



Now, the probability that at least one person is colorblind has three cases in it:




  • Both people are colorblind -> $P(colorblind)^2$

  • First person is colorblind, second person is not -> $P(colorblind)cdot P(colorblind^C)$

  • Second person is colorblind, first person is not -> $P(colorblind)cdot P(colorblind^C)$


Thus, to find the total probability of there being one color blind person, we just add up all of these cases:



$$P(at least one colorblind)=P(colorblind)^2+2P(colorblind)cdot P(colorblind^C) \=frac{(q^2theta+q)^2+2(q^2theta+q)(theta(1-q^2)+1-q)}{(theta+1)^2}$$



I'll leave doing the algebra to you. Good luck!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    To complete the problem, assume the sampling is independent. Then $P(text{at least one colorblind})=1-P(text{not colorblind})^2=1-[1-P(text{colorblind})]^2$
    $endgroup$
    – M. Nestor
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:31












  • $begingroup$
    One more question. This was the answer that I found when I was picking one person and finding the probability of whether he/she is colorblind. So, it remains the same even after I choose two people?
    $endgroup$
    – butterflyflyaway
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:33










  • $begingroup$
    @butterflyflyaway Sorry, see my new edited answer for the actual, final answer of the probability of at least one person being color blind.
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:36










  • $begingroup$
    @M.Nestor This is a valid solution, but it is equivalent to $1-(1-p)^2=1-(p^2+1-2p)=2p-p^2=p^2+2p-2p^2=p^2+2p(1-p)$, which is what I did.
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:38














2












2








2





$begingroup$

Let there be $m$ men and $w$ women (unfortunately, I also have to assume there are also $0$ non-binary people in this population). We have the following:



$$frac m w=thetarightarrow m=theta w$$



Thus, the probabilities of being a man or a woman are:



$$P(man)=frac{m}{m+w}=frac{theta w}{theta w+w}=frac{theta}{theta+1}$$
$$P(woman)=frac{w}{m+w}=frac{w}{theta w+w}=frac{1}{theta+1}$$



Now, we are also given the following:



$$P(colorblind | man)=q^2$$
$$P(colorblind | woman)=q$$



Then, we can use the formula $P(A cap B)=P(B)P(A|B)$ to find the following:



$$P(colorblind cap man)=P(man)P(colorblind | man)=frac{q^2theta}{theta+1}$$
$$P(colorblind cap woman)=P(woman)P(colorblind | woman)=frac{q}{theta+1}$$



Finally, since man and woman are the only two cases in this population, $woman=man^C$—that is, woman is the complement case of man. Thus, we can use the formula $P(A)=P(A cap B)+P(A cap B^C)$ to find:



$$P(colorblind)=P(colorblind cap man)+P(colorblind cap woman)=frac{q^2theta+q}{theta+1}$$



And of course, to find the probability is not colorblind, we use $P(A^C)=1-P(A)$:



$$P(colorblind^C)=1-P(colorblind)=frac{(1-q^2)theta+1-q}{theta+1}$$



Now, the probability that at least one person is colorblind has three cases in it:




  • Both people are colorblind -> $P(colorblind)^2$

  • First person is colorblind, second person is not -> $P(colorblind)cdot P(colorblind^C)$

  • Second person is colorblind, first person is not -> $P(colorblind)cdot P(colorblind^C)$


Thus, to find the total probability of there being one color blind person, we just add up all of these cases:



$$P(at least one colorblind)=P(colorblind)^2+2P(colorblind)cdot P(colorblind^C) \=frac{(q^2theta+q)^2+2(q^2theta+q)(theta(1-q^2)+1-q)}{(theta+1)^2}$$



I'll leave doing the algebra to you. Good luck!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Let there be $m$ men and $w$ women (unfortunately, I also have to assume there are also $0$ non-binary people in this population). We have the following:



$$frac m w=thetarightarrow m=theta w$$



Thus, the probabilities of being a man or a woman are:



$$P(man)=frac{m}{m+w}=frac{theta w}{theta w+w}=frac{theta}{theta+1}$$
$$P(woman)=frac{w}{m+w}=frac{w}{theta w+w}=frac{1}{theta+1}$$



Now, we are also given the following:



$$P(colorblind | man)=q^2$$
$$P(colorblind | woman)=q$$



Then, we can use the formula $P(A cap B)=P(B)P(A|B)$ to find the following:



$$P(colorblind cap man)=P(man)P(colorblind | man)=frac{q^2theta}{theta+1}$$
$$P(colorblind cap woman)=P(woman)P(colorblind | woman)=frac{q}{theta+1}$$



Finally, since man and woman are the only two cases in this population, $woman=man^C$—that is, woman is the complement case of man. Thus, we can use the formula $P(A)=P(A cap B)+P(A cap B^C)$ to find:



$$P(colorblind)=P(colorblind cap man)+P(colorblind cap woman)=frac{q^2theta+q}{theta+1}$$



And of course, to find the probability is not colorblind, we use $P(A^C)=1-P(A)$:



$$P(colorblind^C)=1-P(colorblind)=frac{(1-q^2)theta+1-q}{theta+1}$$



Now, the probability that at least one person is colorblind has three cases in it:




  • Both people are colorblind -> $P(colorblind)^2$

  • First person is colorblind, second person is not -> $P(colorblind)cdot P(colorblind^C)$

  • Second person is colorblind, first person is not -> $P(colorblind)cdot P(colorblind^C)$


Thus, to find the total probability of there being one color blind person, we just add up all of these cases:



$$P(at least one colorblind)=P(colorblind)^2+2P(colorblind)cdot P(colorblind^C) \=frac{(q^2theta+q)^2+2(q^2theta+q)(theta(1-q^2)+1-q)}{(theta+1)^2}$$



I'll leave doing the algebra to you. Good luck!







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 28 '18 at 22:36

























answered Dec 28 '18 at 22:29









Noble MushtakNoble Mushtak

15.4k1835




15.4k1835








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    To complete the problem, assume the sampling is independent. Then $P(text{at least one colorblind})=1-P(text{not colorblind})^2=1-[1-P(text{colorblind})]^2$
    $endgroup$
    – M. Nestor
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:31












  • $begingroup$
    One more question. This was the answer that I found when I was picking one person and finding the probability of whether he/she is colorblind. So, it remains the same even after I choose two people?
    $endgroup$
    – butterflyflyaway
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:33










  • $begingroup$
    @butterflyflyaway Sorry, see my new edited answer for the actual, final answer of the probability of at least one person being color blind.
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:36










  • $begingroup$
    @M.Nestor This is a valid solution, but it is equivalent to $1-(1-p)^2=1-(p^2+1-2p)=2p-p^2=p^2+2p-2p^2=p^2+2p(1-p)$, which is what I did.
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:38














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    To complete the problem, assume the sampling is independent. Then $P(text{at least one colorblind})=1-P(text{not colorblind})^2=1-[1-P(text{colorblind})]^2$
    $endgroup$
    – M. Nestor
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:31












  • $begingroup$
    One more question. This was the answer that I found when I was picking one person and finding the probability of whether he/she is colorblind. So, it remains the same even after I choose two people?
    $endgroup$
    – butterflyflyaway
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:33










  • $begingroup$
    @butterflyflyaway Sorry, see my new edited answer for the actual, final answer of the probability of at least one person being color blind.
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:36










  • $begingroup$
    @M.Nestor This is a valid solution, but it is equivalent to $1-(1-p)^2=1-(p^2+1-2p)=2p-p^2=p^2+2p-2p^2=p^2+2p(1-p)$, which is what I did.
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:38








1




1




$begingroup$
To complete the problem, assume the sampling is independent. Then $P(text{at least one colorblind})=1-P(text{not colorblind})^2=1-[1-P(text{colorblind})]^2$
$endgroup$
– M. Nestor
Dec 28 '18 at 22:31






$begingroup$
To complete the problem, assume the sampling is independent. Then $P(text{at least one colorblind})=1-P(text{not colorblind})^2=1-[1-P(text{colorblind})]^2$
$endgroup$
– M. Nestor
Dec 28 '18 at 22:31














$begingroup$
One more question. This was the answer that I found when I was picking one person and finding the probability of whether he/she is colorblind. So, it remains the same even after I choose two people?
$endgroup$
– butterflyflyaway
Dec 28 '18 at 22:33




$begingroup$
One more question. This was the answer that I found when I was picking one person and finding the probability of whether he/she is colorblind. So, it remains the same even after I choose two people?
$endgroup$
– butterflyflyaway
Dec 28 '18 at 22:33












$begingroup$
@butterflyflyaway Sorry, see my new edited answer for the actual, final answer of the probability of at least one person being color blind.
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Dec 28 '18 at 22:36




$begingroup$
@butterflyflyaway Sorry, see my new edited answer for the actual, final answer of the probability of at least one person being color blind.
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Dec 28 '18 at 22:36












$begingroup$
@M.Nestor This is a valid solution, but it is equivalent to $1-(1-p)^2=1-(p^2+1-2p)=2p-p^2=p^2+2p-2p^2=p^2+2p(1-p)$, which is what I did.
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Dec 28 '18 at 22:38




$begingroup$
@M.Nestor This is a valid solution, but it is equivalent to $1-(1-p)^2=1-(p^2+1-2p)=2p-p^2=p^2+2p-2p^2=p^2+2p(1-p)$, which is what I did.
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Dec 28 '18 at 22:38


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055343%2ffind-the-probability-that-at-least-one-person-with-multiple-variables%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Bundesstraße 106

Image
Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück
Read more

Verónica Boquete

Image
Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl
Read more

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

Image
Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich
Read more