Nested descreasing intersection of nonempty covering compact sets is nonempty (check proof)












0












$begingroup$



Proof that the nested descreasing intersection of nonempty covering compact sets is nonempty.




Let
$$A_{1} supset A_{2} supset cdots supset A_{n} supset cdots$$
be a nested decreasing sequence of compacts. Suppose that $displaystyle bigcap A_{n} = emptyset$. Take $U_{n} = A_{n}^{c}$, then
$$bigcup U_{n} = bigcup A_{n}^{c} = left(bigcap A_{n}right)^{c} = A_{1}.$$
Here, I'm thinking of $A_{1}$ as the main metric space. Since ${U_{n}}$ is an open covering of $A_{1}$, we can extract a finite subcovering, that is,
$$A_{alpha_{1}}^{c}cup A_{alpha_{2}}^{c} cup cdots cup A_{alpha_{m}}^{c} supset A_{1}$$
or
$$(A_{1}setminus A_{alpha_{1}})cup(A_{1}setminus A_{alpha_{2}})cupcdotscup(A_{1}setminus A_{alpha_{m}}) supset A_{1}.$$
But, this is true only if $A_{alpha_{i}} = emptyset$ for some $i$, a contradiction.



Is correct?






proof-verification metric-spaces compactness







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Why is ${U_n}$ an open covering? Compact subsets of topological spaces are not necessarily closed. See $X={0,1}$ with the trivial topology, and the compact subset ${0}$.
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:10










  • $begingroup$
    @SmileyCraft I'm pretty sure that, at least in metric spaces (see the tag), compact subsets are closed.
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:11










  • $begingroup$
    @Noble Mushtak I saw the tag, but what confuses me is that the definition of compactness Lucas uses is very topological. I've never seen it in a real analysis course.
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:12










  • $begingroup$
    @SmileyCraft I'm reading Rudin's Analysis book right now, and they define a compact subset to be such that any open cover of the set has a finite subcover. This is the same definition Lucas seems to be using as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:14












  • $begingroup$
    @SmileyCraft, thats true! In fact, the book Im using define first compact as sequentially compact. But after, the author present the covering compact definition and in this question is requested to use the second definition.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:16
















0












$begingroup$



Proof that the nested descreasing intersection of nonempty covering compact sets is nonempty.




Let
$$A_{1} supset A_{2} supset cdots supset A_{n} supset cdots$$
be a nested decreasing sequence of compacts. Suppose that $displaystyle bigcap A_{n} = emptyset$. Take $U_{n} = A_{n}^{c}$, then
$$bigcup U_{n} = bigcup A_{n}^{c} = left(bigcap A_{n}right)^{c} = A_{1}.$$
Here, I'm thinking of $A_{1}$ as the main metric space. Since ${U_{n}}$ is an open covering of $A_{1}$, we can extract a finite subcovering, that is,
$$A_{alpha_{1}}^{c}cup A_{alpha_{2}}^{c} cup cdots cup A_{alpha_{m}}^{c} supset A_{1}$$
or
$$(A_{1}setminus A_{alpha_{1}})cup(A_{1}setminus A_{alpha_{2}})cupcdotscup(A_{1}setminus A_{alpha_{m}}) supset A_{1}.$$
But, this is true only if $A_{alpha_{i}} = emptyset$ for some $i$, a contradiction.



Is correct?






proof-verification metric-spaces compactness







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Why is ${U_n}$ an open covering? Compact subsets of topological spaces are not necessarily closed. See $X={0,1}$ with the trivial topology, and the compact subset ${0}$.
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:10










  • $begingroup$
    @SmileyCraft I'm pretty sure that, at least in metric spaces (see the tag), compact subsets are closed.
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:11










  • $begingroup$
    @Noble Mushtak I saw the tag, but what confuses me is that the definition of compactness Lucas uses is very topological. I've never seen it in a real analysis course.
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:12










  • $begingroup$
    @SmileyCraft I'm reading Rudin's Analysis book right now, and they define a compact subset to be such that any open cover of the set has a finite subcover. This is the same definition Lucas seems to be using as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:14












  • $begingroup$
    @SmileyCraft, thats true! In fact, the book Im using define first compact as sequentially compact. But after, the author present the covering compact definition and in this question is requested to use the second definition.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:16














0












0








0





$begingroup$



Proof that the nested descreasing intersection of nonempty covering compact sets is nonempty.




Let
$$A_{1} supset A_{2} supset cdots supset A_{n} supset cdots$$
be a nested decreasing sequence of compacts. Suppose that $displaystyle bigcap A_{n} = emptyset$. Take $U_{n} = A_{n}^{c}$, then
$$bigcup U_{n} = bigcup A_{n}^{c} = left(bigcap A_{n}right)^{c} = A_{1}.$$
Here, I'm thinking of $A_{1}$ as the main metric space. Since ${U_{n}}$ is an open covering of $A_{1}$, we can extract a finite subcovering, that is,
$$A_{alpha_{1}}^{c}cup A_{alpha_{2}}^{c} cup cdots cup A_{alpha_{m}}^{c} supset A_{1}$$
or
$$(A_{1}setminus A_{alpha_{1}})cup(A_{1}setminus A_{alpha_{2}})cupcdotscup(A_{1}setminus A_{alpha_{m}}) supset A_{1}.$$
But, this is true only if $A_{alpha_{i}} = emptyset$ for some $i$, a contradiction.



Is correct?






proof-verification metric-spaces compactness







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





Proof that the nested descreasing intersection of nonempty covering compact sets is nonempty.




Let
$$A_{1} supset A_{2} supset cdots supset A_{n} supset cdots$$
be a nested decreasing sequence of compacts. Suppose that $displaystyle bigcap A_{n} = emptyset$. Take $U_{n} = A_{n}^{c}$, then
$$bigcup U_{n} = bigcup A_{n}^{c} = left(bigcap A_{n}right)^{c} = A_{1}.$$
Here, I'm thinking of $A_{1}$ as the main metric space. Since ${U_{n}}$ is an open covering of $A_{1}$, we can extract a finite subcovering, that is,
$$A_{alpha_{1}}^{c}cup A_{alpha_{2}}^{c} cup cdots cup A_{alpha_{m}}^{c} supset A_{1}$$
or
$$(A_{1}setminus A_{alpha_{1}})cup(A_{1}setminus A_{alpha_{2}})cupcdotscup(A_{1}setminus A_{alpha_{m}}) supset A_{1}.$$
But, this is true only if $A_{alpha_{i}} = emptyset$ for some $i$, a contradiction.



Is correct?






proof-verification metric-spaces compactness




proof-verification metric-spaces compactness






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 28 '18 at 22:15









José Carlos Santos

176k24135244




176k24135244










asked Dec 28 '18 at 21:49









Lucas CorrêaLucas Corrêa

1,5761421




1,5761421












  • $begingroup$
    Why is ${U_n}$ an open covering? Compact subsets of topological spaces are not necessarily closed. See $X={0,1}$ with the trivial topology, and the compact subset ${0}$.
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:10










  • $begingroup$
    @SmileyCraft I'm pretty sure that, at least in metric spaces (see the tag), compact subsets are closed.
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:11










  • $begingroup$
    @Noble Mushtak I saw the tag, but what confuses me is that the definition of compactness Lucas uses is very topological. I've never seen it in a real analysis course.
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:12










  • $begingroup$
    @SmileyCraft I'm reading Rudin's Analysis book right now, and they define a compact subset to be such that any open cover of the set has a finite subcover. This is the same definition Lucas seems to be using as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:14












  • $begingroup$
    @SmileyCraft, thats true! In fact, the book Im using define first compact as sequentially compact. But after, the author present the covering compact definition and in this question is requested to use the second definition.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:16


















  • $begingroup$
    Why is ${U_n}$ an open covering? Compact subsets of topological spaces are not necessarily closed. See $X={0,1}$ with the trivial topology, and the compact subset ${0}$.
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:10










  • $begingroup$
    @SmileyCraft I'm pretty sure that, at least in metric spaces (see the tag), compact subsets are closed.
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:11










  • $begingroup$
    @Noble Mushtak I saw the tag, but what confuses me is that the definition of compactness Lucas uses is very topological. I've never seen it in a real analysis course.
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:12










  • $begingroup$
    @SmileyCraft I'm reading Rudin's Analysis book right now, and they define a compact subset to be such that any open cover of the set has a finite subcover. This is the same definition Lucas seems to be using as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:14












  • $begingroup$
    @SmileyCraft, thats true! In fact, the book Im using define first compact as sequentially compact. But after, the author present the covering compact definition and in this question is requested to use the second definition.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:16
















$begingroup$
Why is ${U_n}$ an open covering? Compact subsets of topological spaces are not necessarily closed. See $X={0,1}$ with the trivial topology, and the compact subset ${0}$.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 28 '18 at 22:10




$begingroup$
Why is ${U_n}$ an open covering? Compact subsets of topological spaces are not necessarily closed. See $X={0,1}$ with the trivial topology, and the compact subset ${0}$.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 28 '18 at 22:10












$begingroup$
@SmileyCraft I'm pretty sure that, at least in metric spaces (see the tag), compact subsets are closed.
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Dec 28 '18 at 22:11




$begingroup$
@SmileyCraft I'm pretty sure that, at least in metric spaces (see the tag), compact subsets are closed.
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Dec 28 '18 at 22:11












$begingroup$
@Noble Mushtak I saw the tag, but what confuses me is that the definition of compactness Lucas uses is very topological. I've never seen it in a real analysis course.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 28 '18 at 22:12




$begingroup$
@Noble Mushtak I saw the tag, but what confuses me is that the definition of compactness Lucas uses is very topological. I've never seen it in a real analysis course.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 28 '18 at 22:12












$begingroup$
@SmileyCraft I'm reading Rudin's Analysis book right now, and they define a compact subset to be such that any open cover of the set has a finite subcover. This is the same definition Lucas seems to be using as well.
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Dec 28 '18 at 22:14






$begingroup$
@SmileyCraft I'm reading Rudin's Analysis book right now, and they define a compact subset to be such that any open cover of the set has a finite subcover. This is the same definition Lucas seems to be using as well.
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Dec 28 '18 at 22:14














$begingroup$
@SmileyCraft, thats true! In fact, the book Im using define first compact as sequentially compact. But after, the author present the covering compact definition and in this question is requested to use the second definition.
$endgroup$
– Lucas Corrêa
Dec 28 '18 at 22:16




$begingroup$
@SmileyCraft, thats true! In fact, the book Im using define first compact as sequentially compact. But after, the author present the covering compact definition and in this question is requested to use the second definition.
$endgroup$
– Lucas Corrêa
Dec 28 '18 at 22:16










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

In my opinion, you should add a justification of the assertion according to which that$$(A_1setminus A_{alpha_1})cup(A_1setminus A_{alpha_2})cupcdotscup(A_1setminus A_{alpha_m})supset A_1tag1$$can only occur if $A_1=emptyset$. This happens because$$(1)iff A_{alpha_1}capcdotscap A_{alpha_m}=emptyset,$$but$$A_{alpha_1}capcdotscap A_{alpha_m}=A_{max{alpha_1,ldots,alpha_m}}neqemptyset.$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the suggestion, José. I'll justify this!
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:13














Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055321%2fnested-descreasing-intersection-of-nonempty-covering-compact-sets-is-nonempty-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

In my opinion, you should add a justification of the assertion according to which that$$(A_1setminus A_{alpha_1})cup(A_1setminus A_{alpha_2})cupcdotscup(A_1setminus A_{alpha_m})supset A_1tag1$$can only occur if $A_1=emptyset$. This happens because$$(1)iff A_{alpha_1}capcdotscap A_{alpha_m}=emptyset,$$but$$A_{alpha_1}capcdotscap A_{alpha_m}=A_{max{alpha_1,ldots,alpha_m}}neqemptyset.$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the suggestion, José. I'll justify this!
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:13


















1












$begingroup$

In my opinion, you should add a justification of the assertion according to which that$$(A_1setminus A_{alpha_1})cup(A_1setminus A_{alpha_2})cupcdotscup(A_1setminus A_{alpha_m})supset A_1tag1$$can only occur if $A_1=emptyset$. This happens because$$(1)iff A_{alpha_1}capcdotscap A_{alpha_m}=emptyset,$$but$$A_{alpha_1}capcdotscap A_{alpha_m}=A_{max{alpha_1,ldots,alpha_m}}neqemptyset.$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the suggestion, José. I'll justify this!
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:13
















1












1








1





$begingroup$

In my opinion, you should add a justification of the assertion according to which that$$(A_1setminus A_{alpha_1})cup(A_1setminus A_{alpha_2})cupcdotscup(A_1setminus A_{alpha_m})supset A_1tag1$$can only occur if $A_1=emptyset$. This happens because$$(1)iff A_{alpha_1}capcdotscap A_{alpha_m}=emptyset,$$but$$A_{alpha_1}capcdotscap A_{alpha_m}=A_{max{alpha_1,ldots,alpha_m}}neqemptyset.$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



In my opinion, you should add a justification of the assertion according to which that$$(A_1setminus A_{alpha_1})cup(A_1setminus A_{alpha_2})cupcdotscup(A_1setminus A_{alpha_m})supset A_1tag1$$can only occur if $A_1=emptyset$. This happens because$$(1)iff A_{alpha_1}capcdotscap A_{alpha_m}=emptyset,$$but$$A_{alpha_1}capcdotscap A_{alpha_m}=A_{max{alpha_1,ldots,alpha_m}}neqemptyset.$$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 28 '18 at 22:09









José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

176k24135244




176k24135244












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the suggestion, José. I'll justify this!
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:13




















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the suggestion, José. I'll justify this!
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    Dec 28 '18 at 22:13


















$begingroup$
Thanks for the suggestion, José. I'll justify this!
$endgroup$
– Lucas Corrêa
Dec 28 '18 at 22:13






$begingroup$
Thanks for the suggestion, José. I'll justify this!
$endgroup$
– Lucas Corrêa
Dec 28 '18 at 22:13




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055321%2fnested-descreasing-intersection-of-nonempty-covering-compact-sets-is-nonempty-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Bundesstraße 106

Image
Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück
Read more

Verónica Boquete

Image
Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl
Read more

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

Image
Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich
Read more