how to plug height and time into a quadratic equation $h=at^2+bt+c$











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












How to plug height and time into a quadratic equation $$h=at^2+bt+c$$ to model the height of the object $t$ seconds after it is shot into the air?
The height is $163.6$ feet the time is $1.2$ seconds.



Is it like this:



$$h=163.6(1.2)^2+163.3(1.2)+0$$










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    How to plug height and time into a quadratic equation $$h=at^2+bt+c$$ to model the height of the object $t$ seconds after it is shot into the air?
    The height is $163.6$ feet the time is $1.2$ seconds.



    Is it like this:



    $$h=163.6(1.2)^2+163.3(1.2)+0$$










    share|cite|improve this question









    New contributor




    student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      How to plug height and time into a quadratic equation $$h=at^2+bt+c$$ to model the height of the object $t$ seconds after it is shot into the air?
      The height is $163.6$ feet the time is $1.2$ seconds.



      Is it like this:



      $$h=163.6(1.2)^2+163.3(1.2)+0$$










      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      How to plug height and time into a quadratic equation $$h=at^2+bt+c$$ to model the height of the object $t$ seconds after it is shot into the air?
      The height is $163.6$ feet the time is $1.2$ seconds.



      Is it like this:



      $$h=163.6(1.2)^2+163.3(1.2)+0$$







      mathematical-physics






      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 16 at 17:25









      smcc

      4,157517




      4,157517






      New contributor




      student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked Nov 16 at 17:22









      student

      1




      1




      New contributor




      student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          It looks you are actually being asked to find the values of the parameters $a$, $b$ and $c$. You know that:




          • at $t=1.2$, $h=163.6$

          • at $t=0$, $h=0$ (this is presuming the height is measured relative to where the object was shot from)


          You can use the second piece of information to work out $c$. However you have not given enough information to find $a$ and $b$. (You need one more data point to determine $a$ and $b$ uniquely.)






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            In your equation, $h$ is probably the height, $a$ is twice the acceleration ($-2g$), $b$ is the initial velocity, and $c$ is the initial height. The typical equation used for this is called a kinematic equation



            $x = x_0 + v_0 t + frac{1}{2}a_0t^2$,



            where $a_0 = g = 9.8m/s^2$.



            On the other hand, if you are just given this equation with no knowledge of the physical situation, you will have to plug in 163.6 for $h$ and 1.2 for $t$ and solve for $a$, $b$, and $c$. Also, you probably know that at $t=0$, $h=0$, so you can use this to find $c = 0$. However, you can't find $a$ or $b$ without more information about the trajectory (the velocity and acceleration at $t=0$, for instance).



            Edit:



            "After 1.2 seconds the object is 163.6 feet off the ground, at 4 seconds it is 307.8 feet off the ground, and at 5 seconds it is 298.5 feet off the ground"



            Now you have three equations:



            $163.6 = a(1.2)^2+b(1.2)+c$



            $307.8 = a(4)^2+b(4)+c$



            $298.5 = a(5)^2+b(5)+c$



            By solving this system of equations, you can find the values of a, b, and c






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • This is what was given to me: An object sitting on a platform is shot into the air, and you are able to record its heights at various times: after 1.2 seconds the object is 163.6 feet off the ground, at 4 seconds it is 307.8 feet off the ground, and at 5 seconds it is 298.5 feet off the ground
              – student
              Nov 16 at 17:41










            • Okay, so now you have 3 unknowns and 3 equations, so you can solve for a, b, and c by plugging in your values for each point and then solving the system of equations.
              – Nathaniel D. Hoffman
              Nov 16 at 17:43










            • How would solve this system of equations to get a,b,c do I substitute a variable for
              – student
              Nov 16 at 17:54










            • @student I have edited my answer to show the equations you need to solve. There are many ways to solve a system of equations, but one way is by substitution. Solve one equation for and substitute it into the other two equations. Then you will have those two in terms of b and c, so you can solve one for b and substitute it into the last equation to get c. Then, plugging c into the equations you've found, you should be able to get a and b.
              – Nathaniel D. Hoffman
              Nov 16 at 18:05











            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            student is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001399%2fhow-to-plug-height-and-time-into-a-quadratic-equation-h-at2btc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            0
            down vote













            It looks you are actually being asked to find the values of the parameters $a$, $b$ and $c$. You know that:




            • at $t=1.2$, $h=163.6$

            • at $t=0$, $h=0$ (this is presuming the height is measured relative to where the object was shot from)


            You can use the second piece of information to work out $c$. However you have not given enough information to find $a$ and $b$. (You need one more data point to determine $a$ and $b$ uniquely.)






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              It looks you are actually being asked to find the values of the parameters $a$, $b$ and $c$. You know that:




              • at $t=1.2$, $h=163.6$

              • at $t=0$, $h=0$ (this is presuming the height is measured relative to where the object was shot from)


              You can use the second piece of information to work out $c$. However you have not given enough information to find $a$ and $b$. (You need one more data point to determine $a$ and $b$ uniquely.)






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                0
                down vote










                up vote
                0
                down vote









                It looks you are actually being asked to find the values of the parameters $a$, $b$ and $c$. You know that:




                • at $t=1.2$, $h=163.6$

                • at $t=0$, $h=0$ (this is presuming the height is measured relative to where the object was shot from)


                You can use the second piece of information to work out $c$. However you have not given enough information to find $a$ and $b$. (You need one more data point to determine $a$ and $b$ uniquely.)






                share|cite|improve this answer












                It looks you are actually being asked to find the values of the parameters $a$, $b$ and $c$. You know that:




                • at $t=1.2$, $h=163.6$

                • at $t=0$, $h=0$ (this is presuming the height is measured relative to where the object was shot from)


                You can use the second piece of information to work out $c$. However you have not given enough information to find $a$ and $b$. (You need one more data point to determine $a$ and $b$ uniquely.)







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 16 at 17:32









                smcc

                4,157517




                4,157517






















                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote













                    In your equation, $h$ is probably the height, $a$ is twice the acceleration ($-2g$), $b$ is the initial velocity, and $c$ is the initial height. The typical equation used for this is called a kinematic equation



                    $x = x_0 + v_0 t + frac{1}{2}a_0t^2$,



                    where $a_0 = g = 9.8m/s^2$.



                    On the other hand, if you are just given this equation with no knowledge of the physical situation, you will have to plug in 163.6 for $h$ and 1.2 for $t$ and solve for $a$, $b$, and $c$. Also, you probably know that at $t=0$, $h=0$, so you can use this to find $c = 0$. However, you can't find $a$ or $b$ without more information about the trajectory (the velocity and acceleration at $t=0$, for instance).



                    Edit:



                    "After 1.2 seconds the object is 163.6 feet off the ground, at 4 seconds it is 307.8 feet off the ground, and at 5 seconds it is 298.5 feet off the ground"



                    Now you have three equations:



                    $163.6 = a(1.2)^2+b(1.2)+c$



                    $307.8 = a(4)^2+b(4)+c$



                    $298.5 = a(5)^2+b(5)+c$



                    By solving this system of equations, you can find the values of a, b, and c






                    share|cite|improve this answer























                    • This is what was given to me: An object sitting on a platform is shot into the air, and you are able to record its heights at various times: after 1.2 seconds the object is 163.6 feet off the ground, at 4 seconds it is 307.8 feet off the ground, and at 5 seconds it is 298.5 feet off the ground
                      – student
                      Nov 16 at 17:41










                    • Okay, so now you have 3 unknowns and 3 equations, so you can solve for a, b, and c by plugging in your values for each point and then solving the system of equations.
                      – Nathaniel D. Hoffman
                      Nov 16 at 17:43










                    • How would solve this system of equations to get a,b,c do I substitute a variable for
                      – student
                      Nov 16 at 17:54










                    • @student I have edited my answer to show the equations you need to solve. There are many ways to solve a system of equations, but one way is by substitution. Solve one equation for and substitute it into the other two equations. Then you will have those two in terms of b and c, so you can solve one for b and substitute it into the last equation to get c. Then, plugging c into the equations you've found, you should be able to get a and b.
                      – Nathaniel D. Hoffman
                      Nov 16 at 18:05















                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote













                    In your equation, $h$ is probably the height, $a$ is twice the acceleration ($-2g$), $b$ is the initial velocity, and $c$ is the initial height. The typical equation used for this is called a kinematic equation



                    $x = x_0 + v_0 t + frac{1}{2}a_0t^2$,



                    where $a_0 = g = 9.8m/s^2$.



                    On the other hand, if you are just given this equation with no knowledge of the physical situation, you will have to plug in 163.6 for $h$ and 1.2 for $t$ and solve for $a$, $b$, and $c$. Also, you probably know that at $t=0$, $h=0$, so you can use this to find $c = 0$. However, you can't find $a$ or $b$ without more information about the trajectory (the velocity and acceleration at $t=0$, for instance).



                    Edit:



                    "After 1.2 seconds the object is 163.6 feet off the ground, at 4 seconds it is 307.8 feet off the ground, and at 5 seconds it is 298.5 feet off the ground"



                    Now you have three equations:



                    $163.6 = a(1.2)^2+b(1.2)+c$



                    $307.8 = a(4)^2+b(4)+c$



                    $298.5 = a(5)^2+b(5)+c$



                    By solving this system of equations, you can find the values of a, b, and c






                    share|cite|improve this answer























                    • This is what was given to me: An object sitting on a platform is shot into the air, and you are able to record its heights at various times: after 1.2 seconds the object is 163.6 feet off the ground, at 4 seconds it is 307.8 feet off the ground, and at 5 seconds it is 298.5 feet off the ground
                      – student
                      Nov 16 at 17:41










                    • Okay, so now you have 3 unknowns and 3 equations, so you can solve for a, b, and c by plugging in your values for each point and then solving the system of equations.
                      – Nathaniel D. Hoffman
                      Nov 16 at 17:43










                    • How would solve this system of equations to get a,b,c do I substitute a variable for
                      – student
                      Nov 16 at 17:54










                    • @student I have edited my answer to show the equations you need to solve. There are many ways to solve a system of equations, but one way is by substitution. Solve one equation for and substitute it into the other two equations. Then you will have those two in terms of b and c, so you can solve one for b and substitute it into the last equation to get c. Then, plugging c into the equations you've found, you should be able to get a and b.
                      – Nathaniel D. Hoffman
                      Nov 16 at 18:05













                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote









                    In your equation, $h$ is probably the height, $a$ is twice the acceleration ($-2g$), $b$ is the initial velocity, and $c$ is the initial height. The typical equation used for this is called a kinematic equation



                    $x = x_0 + v_0 t + frac{1}{2}a_0t^2$,



                    where $a_0 = g = 9.8m/s^2$.



                    On the other hand, if you are just given this equation with no knowledge of the physical situation, you will have to plug in 163.6 for $h$ and 1.2 for $t$ and solve for $a$, $b$, and $c$. Also, you probably know that at $t=0$, $h=0$, so you can use this to find $c = 0$. However, you can't find $a$ or $b$ without more information about the trajectory (the velocity and acceleration at $t=0$, for instance).



                    Edit:



                    "After 1.2 seconds the object is 163.6 feet off the ground, at 4 seconds it is 307.8 feet off the ground, and at 5 seconds it is 298.5 feet off the ground"



                    Now you have three equations:



                    $163.6 = a(1.2)^2+b(1.2)+c$



                    $307.8 = a(4)^2+b(4)+c$



                    $298.5 = a(5)^2+b(5)+c$



                    By solving this system of equations, you can find the values of a, b, and c






                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    In your equation, $h$ is probably the height, $a$ is twice the acceleration ($-2g$), $b$ is the initial velocity, and $c$ is the initial height. The typical equation used for this is called a kinematic equation



                    $x = x_0 + v_0 t + frac{1}{2}a_0t^2$,



                    where $a_0 = g = 9.8m/s^2$.



                    On the other hand, if you are just given this equation with no knowledge of the physical situation, you will have to plug in 163.6 for $h$ and 1.2 for $t$ and solve for $a$, $b$, and $c$. Also, you probably know that at $t=0$, $h=0$, so you can use this to find $c = 0$. However, you can't find $a$ or $b$ without more information about the trajectory (the velocity and acceleration at $t=0$, for instance).



                    Edit:



                    "After 1.2 seconds the object is 163.6 feet off the ground, at 4 seconds it is 307.8 feet off the ground, and at 5 seconds it is 298.5 feet off the ground"



                    Now you have three equations:



                    $163.6 = a(1.2)^2+b(1.2)+c$



                    $307.8 = a(4)^2+b(4)+c$



                    $298.5 = a(5)^2+b(5)+c$



                    By solving this system of equations, you can find the values of a, b, and c







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Nov 16 at 17:47

























                    answered Nov 16 at 17:37









                    Nathaniel D. Hoffman

                    356




                    356












                    • This is what was given to me: An object sitting on a platform is shot into the air, and you are able to record its heights at various times: after 1.2 seconds the object is 163.6 feet off the ground, at 4 seconds it is 307.8 feet off the ground, and at 5 seconds it is 298.5 feet off the ground
                      – student
                      Nov 16 at 17:41










                    • Okay, so now you have 3 unknowns and 3 equations, so you can solve for a, b, and c by plugging in your values for each point and then solving the system of equations.
                      – Nathaniel D. Hoffman
                      Nov 16 at 17:43










                    • How would solve this system of equations to get a,b,c do I substitute a variable for
                      – student
                      Nov 16 at 17:54










                    • @student I have edited my answer to show the equations you need to solve. There are many ways to solve a system of equations, but one way is by substitution. Solve one equation for and substitute it into the other two equations. Then you will have those two in terms of b and c, so you can solve one for b and substitute it into the last equation to get c. Then, plugging c into the equations you've found, you should be able to get a and b.
                      – Nathaniel D. Hoffman
                      Nov 16 at 18:05


















                    • This is what was given to me: An object sitting on a platform is shot into the air, and you are able to record its heights at various times: after 1.2 seconds the object is 163.6 feet off the ground, at 4 seconds it is 307.8 feet off the ground, and at 5 seconds it is 298.5 feet off the ground
                      – student
                      Nov 16 at 17:41










                    • Okay, so now you have 3 unknowns and 3 equations, so you can solve for a, b, and c by plugging in your values for each point and then solving the system of equations.
                      – Nathaniel D. Hoffman
                      Nov 16 at 17:43










                    • How would solve this system of equations to get a,b,c do I substitute a variable for
                      – student
                      Nov 16 at 17:54










                    • @student I have edited my answer to show the equations you need to solve. There are many ways to solve a system of equations, but one way is by substitution. Solve one equation for and substitute it into the other two equations. Then you will have those two in terms of b and c, so you can solve one for b and substitute it into the last equation to get c. Then, plugging c into the equations you've found, you should be able to get a and b.
                      – Nathaniel D. Hoffman
                      Nov 16 at 18:05
















                    This is what was given to me: An object sitting on a platform is shot into the air, and you are able to record its heights at various times: after 1.2 seconds the object is 163.6 feet off the ground, at 4 seconds it is 307.8 feet off the ground, and at 5 seconds it is 298.5 feet off the ground
                    – student
                    Nov 16 at 17:41




                    This is what was given to me: An object sitting on a platform is shot into the air, and you are able to record its heights at various times: after 1.2 seconds the object is 163.6 feet off the ground, at 4 seconds it is 307.8 feet off the ground, and at 5 seconds it is 298.5 feet off the ground
                    – student
                    Nov 16 at 17:41












                    Okay, so now you have 3 unknowns and 3 equations, so you can solve for a, b, and c by plugging in your values for each point and then solving the system of equations.
                    – Nathaniel D. Hoffman
                    Nov 16 at 17:43




                    Okay, so now you have 3 unknowns and 3 equations, so you can solve for a, b, and c by plugging in your values for each point and then solving the system of equations.
                    – Nathaniel D. Hoffman
                    Nov 16 at 17:43












                    How would solve this system of equations to get a,b,c do I substitute a variable for
                    – student
                    Nov 16 at 17:54




                    How would solve this system of equations to get a,b,c do I substitute a variable for
                    – student
                    Nov 16 at 17:54












                    @student I have edited my answer to show the equations you need to solve. There are many ways to solve a system of equations, but one way is by substitution. Solve one equation for and substitute it into the other two equations. Then you will have those two in terms of b and c, so you can solve one for b and substitute it into the last equation to get c. Then, plugging c into the equations you've found, you should be able to get a and b.
                    – Nathaniel D. Hoffman
                    Nov 16 at 18:05




                    @student I have edited my answer to show the equations you need to solve. There are many ways to solve a system of equations, but one way is by substitution. Solve one equation for and substitute it into the other two equations. Then you will have those two in terms of b and c, so you can solve one for b and substitute it into the last equation to get c. Then, plugging c into the equations you've found, you should be able to get a and b.
                    – Nathaniel D. Hoffman
                    Nov 16 at 18:05










                    student is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


















                    student is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    student is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    student is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001399%2fhow-to-plug-height-and-time-into-a-quadratic-equation-h-at2btc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bundesstraße 106

                    Verónica Boquete

                    Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten