Using (rigid) Origami moves only, what is the maximum volume that can be enclosed by a square piece of paper?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Motivation:
This is inspired by this question.
The Question:
What is the maximum volume that can be enclosed by folding a square piece of paper (with side length $ell$) using only (rigid) Origami moves?
Thoughts:
I found this, but it's not very helpful because it doesn't give a specific volume and I can't find the paper it references.
It's not a question I think I can answer myself. I have no formal training in Origami and know very little about it.
I'm guessing the shape is just a cube but I'm not sure how to prove that.
Please help :)
geometry optimization recreational-mathematics volume origami
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Motivation:
This is inspired by this question.
The Question:
What is the maximum volume that can be enclosed by folding a square piece of paper (with side length $ell$) using only (rigid) Origami moves?
Thoughts:
I found this, but it's not very helpful because it doesn't give a specific volume and I can't find the paper it references.
It's not a question I think I can answer myself. I have no formal training in Origami and know very little about it.
I'm guessing the shape is just a cube but I'm not sure how to prove that.
Please help :)
geometry optimization recreational-mathematics volume origami
1
It seems you want a closed (convex?) polyhedron whereas the linked question concerns an open "dish". If so, see Alexander, Dyson, and O'Rourke, "The Foldings of a Square to Convex Polyhedra, 2002.
– Rahul
Nov 18 at 19:17
1
The ref it pointed to is a book (I've a hard copy of that). In the book, it say the volume is about $0.056$ which is about $60$% of the volume of a unit-area sphere.
– achille hui
Nov 18 at 19:31
1
yes, it is that book.
– achille hui
Nov 18 at 19:41
1
that result is for a unit square. i.e. $ell = 1$.
– achille hui
Nov 18 at 19:50
1
The same result is included in the paper I linked to (Joseph O'Rourke is a coauthor of both), and the paper is freely available via O'Rourke's webpage.
– Rahul
Nov 19 at 5:23
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Motivation:
This is inspired by this question.
The Question:
What is the maximum volume that can be enclosed by folding a square piece of paper (with side length $ell$) using only (rigid) Origami moves?
Thoughts:
I found this, but it's not very helpful because it doesn't give a specific volume and I can't find the paper it references.
It's not a question I think I can answer myself. I have no formal training in Origami and know very little about it.
I'm guessing the shape is just a cube but I'm not sure how to prove that.
Please help :)
geometry optimization recreational-mathematics volume origami
Motivation:
This is inspired by this question.
The Question:
What is the maximum volume that can be enclosed by folding a square piece of paper (with side length $ell$) using only (rigid) Origami moves?
Thoughts:
I found this, but it's not very helpful because it doesn't give a specific volume and I can't find the paper it references.
It's not a question I think I can answer myself. I have no formal training in Origami and know very little about it.
I'm guessing the shape is just a cube but I'm not sure how to prove that.
Please help :)
geometry optimization recreational-mathematics volume origami
geometry optimization recreational-mathematics volume origami
asked Nov 18 at 18:36
Shaun
7,942113377
7,942113377
1
It seems you want a closed (convex?) polyhedron whereas the linked question concerns an open "dish". If so, see Alexander, Dyson, and O'Rourke, "The Foldings of a Square to Convex Polyhedra, 2002.
– Rahul
Nov 18 at 19:17
1
The ref it pointed to is a book (I've a hard copy of that). In the book, it say the volume is about $0.056$ which is about $60$% of the volume of a unit-area sphere.
– achille hui
Nov 18 at 19:31
1
yes, it is that book.
– achille hui
Nov 18 at 19:41
1
that result is for a unit square. i.e. $ell = 1$.
– achille hui
Nov 18 at 19:50
1
The same result is included in the paper I linked to (Joseph O'Rourke is a coauthor of both), and the paper is freely available via O'Rourke's webpage.
– Rahul
Nov 19 at 5:23
|
show 3 more comments
1
It seems you want a closed (convex?) polyhedron whereas the linked question concerns an open "dish". If so, see Alexander, Dyson, and O'Rourke, "The Foldings of a Square to Convex Polyhedra, 2002.
– Rahul
Nov 18 at 19:17
1
The ref it pointed to is a book (I've a hard copy of that). In the book, it say the volume is about $0.056$ which is about $60$% of the volume of a unit-area sphere.
– achille hui
Nov 18 at 19:31
1
yes, it is that book.
– achille hui
Nov 18 at 19:41
1
that result is for a unit square. i.e. $ell = 1$.
– achille hui
Nov 18 at 19:50
1
The same result is included in the paper I linked to (Joseph O'Rourke is a coauthor of both), and the paper is freely available via O'Rourke's webpage.
– Rahul
Nov 19 at 5:23
1
1
It seems you want a closed (convex?) polyhedron whereas the linked question concerns an open "dish". If so, see Alexander, Dyson, and O'Rourke, "The Foldings of a Square to Convex Polyhedra, 2002.
– Rahul
Nov 18 at 19:17
It seems you want a closed (convex?) polyhedron whereas the linked question concerns an open "dish". If so, see Alexander, Dyson, and O'Rourke, "The Foldings of a Square to Convex Polyhedra, 2002.
– Rahul
Nov 18 at 19:17
1
1
The ref it pointed to is a book (I've a hard copy of that). In the book, it say the volume is about $0.056$ which is about $60$% of the volume of a unit-area sphere.
– achille hui
Nov 18 at 19:31
The ref it pointed to is a book (I've a hard copy of that). In the book, it say the volume is about $0.056$ which is about $60$% of the volume of a unit-area sphere.
– achille hui
Nov 18 at 19:31
1
1
yes, it is that book.
– achille hui
Nov 18 at 19:41
yes, it is that book.
– achille hui
Nov 18 at 19:41
1
1
that result is for a unit square. i.e. $ell = 1$.
– achille hui
Nov 18 at 19:50
that result is for a unit square. i.e. $ell = 1$.
– achille hui
Nov 18 at 19:50
1
1
The same result is included in the paper I linked to (Joseph O'Rourke is a coauthor of both), and the paper is freely available via O'Rourke's webpage.
– Rahul
Nov 19 at 5:23
The same result is included in the paper I linked to (Joseph O'Rourke is a coauthor of both), and the paper is freely available via O'Rourke's webpage.
– Rahul
Nov 19 at 5:23
|
show 3 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
In order to close the question, here is a community wiki answer from the comments.
The ref it pointed to is a book (I've a hard copy of that). In the book, it say the volume is about $0.056$ which is about $60%$ of the volume of a unit-area sphere.
This is by achille hui, Nov 18 at 19:31.
@achillehui, I'll leave this here until you post the answer yourself.
– Shaun
Nov 24 at 3:38
1
I won't post any answer. Joseph O'Rourke is a user on math.SE. If he ever see this question, he can provide an answer with much more details...
– achille hui
2 days ago
Well, until that day, @achillehui, this answer should suffice.
– Shaun
2 days ago
In fact, here's a tag for @JosephO'Rouke. I hope he doesn't mind this comment $ddotsmile$.
– Shaun
2 days ago
1
Tagging a general user won't work. The system will only notify the user if he/she has interacted with a page before.
– achille hui
2 days ago
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
In order to close the question, here is a community wiki answer from the comments.
The ref it pointed to is a book (I've a hard copy of that). In the book, it say the volume is about $0.056$ which is about $60%$ of the volume of a unit-area sphere.
This is by achille hui, Nov 18 at 19:31.
@achillehui, I'll leave this here until you post the answer yourself.
– Shaun
Nov 24 at 3:38
1
I won't post any answer. Joseph O'Rourke is a user on math.SE. If he ever see this question, he can provide an answer with much more details...
– achille hui
2 days ago
Well, until that day, @achillehui, this answer should suffice.
– Shaun
2 days ago
In fact, here's a tag for @JosephO'Rouke. I hope he doesn't mind this comment $ddotsmile$.
– Shaun
2 days ago
1
Tagging a general user won't work. The system will only notify the user if he/she has interacted with a page before.
– achille hui
2 days ago
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
In order to close the question, here is a community wiki answer from the comments.
The ref it pointed to is a book (I've a hard copy of that). In the book, it say the volume is about $0.056$ which is about $60%$ of the volume of a unit-area sphere.
This is by achille hui, Nov 18 at 19:31.
@achillehui, I'll leave this here until you post the answer yourself.
– Shaun
Nov 24 at 3:38
1
I won't post any answer. Joseph O'Rourke is a user on math.SE. If he ever see this question, he can provide an answer with much more details...
– achille hui
2 days ago
Well, until that day, @achillehui, this answer should suffice.
– Shaun
2 days ago
In fact, here's a tag for @JosephO'Rouke. I hope he doesn't mind this comment $ddotsmile$.
– Shaun
2 days ago
1
Tagging a general user won't work. The system will only notify the user if he/she has interacted with a page before.
– achille hui
2 days ago
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
In order to close the question, here is a community wiki answer from the comments.
The ref it pointed to is a book (I've a hard copy of that). In the book, it say the volume is about $0.056$ which is about $60%$ of the volume of a unit-area sphere.
This is by achille hui, Nov 18 at 19:31.
In order to close the question, here is a community wiki answer from the comments.
The ref it pointed to is a book (I've a hard copy of that). In the book, it say the volume is about $0.056$ which is about $60%$ of the volume of a unit-area sphere.
This is by achille hui, Nov 18 at 19:31.
answered Nov 24 at 3:35
community wiki
Shaun
@achillehui, I'll leave this here until you post the answer yourself.
– Shaun
Nov 24 at 3:38
1
I won't post any answer. Joseph O'Rourke is a user on math.SE. If he ever see this question, he can provide an answer with much more details...
– achille hui
2 days ago
Well, until that day, @achillehui, this answer should suffice.
– Shaun
2 days ago
In fact, here's a tag for @JosephO'Rouke. I hope he doesn't mind this comment $ddotsmile$.
– Shaun
2 days ago
1
Tagging a general user won't work. The system will only notify the user if he/she has interacted with a page before.
– achille hui
2 days ago
|
show 1 more comment
@achillehui, I'll leave this here until you post the answer yourself.
– Shaun
Nov 24 at 3:38
1
I won't post any answer. Joseph O'Rourke is a user on math.SE. If he ever see this question, he can provide an answer with much more details...
– achille hui
2 days ago
Well, until that day, @achillehui, this answer should suffice.
– Shaun
2 days ago
In fact, here's a tag for @JosephO'Rouke. I hope he doesn't mind this comment $ddotsmile$.
– Shaun
2 days ago
1
Tagging a general user won't work. The system will only notify the user if he/she has interacted with a page before.
– achille hui
2 days ago
@achillehui, I'll leave this here until you post the answer yourself.
– Shaun
Nov 24 at 3:38
@achillehui, I'll leave this here until you post the answer yourself.
– Shaun
Nov 24 at 3:38
1
1
I won't post any answer. Joseph O'Rourke is a user on math.SE. If he ever see this question, he can provide an answer with much more details...
– achille hui
2 days ago
I won't post any answer. Joseph O'Rourke is a user on math.SE. If he ever see this question, he can provide an answer with much more details...
– achille hui
2 days ago
Well, until that day, @achillehui, this answer should suffice.
– Shaun
2 days ago
Well, until that day, @achillehui, this answer should suffice.
– Shaun
2 days ago
In fact, here's a tag for @JosephO'Rouke. I hope he doesn't mind this comment $ddotsmile$.
– Shaun
2 days ago
In fact, here's a tag for @JosephO'Rouke. I hope he doesn't mind this comment $ddotsmile$.
– Shaun
2 days ago
1
1
Tagging a general user won't work. The system will only notify the user if he/she has interacted with a page before.
– achille hui
2 days ago
Tagging a general user won't work. The system will only notify the user if he/she has interacted with a page before.
– achille hui
2 days ago
|
show 1 more comment
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3003930%2fusing-rigid-origami-moves-only-what-is-the-maximum-volume-that-can-be-enclose%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
It seems you want a closed (convex?) polyhedron whereas the linked question concerns an open "dish". If so, see Alexander, Dyson, and O'Rourke, "The Foldings of a Square to Convex Polyhedra, 2002.
– Rahul
Nov 18 at 19:17
1
The ref it pointed to is a book (I've a hard copy of that). In the book, it say the volume is about $0.056$ which is about $60$% of the volume of a unit-area sphere.
– achille hui
Nov 18 at 19:31
1
yes, it is that book.
– achille hui
Nov 18 at 19:41
1
that result is for a unit square. i.e. $ell = 1$.
– achille hui
Nov 18 at 19:50
1
The same result is included in the paper I linked to (Joseph O'Rourke is a coauthor of both), and the paper is freely available via O'Rourke's webpage.
– Rahul
Nov 19 at 5:23