If $f$ is $mathbb R^2$-differentiable and the limit $limlimits_{h to 0} Releft(frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}{h}right)$...












1














Assume $f$ is defined on some domain $Dsubsetmathbb C$, differentiable on $D$ as a function of two real variables, and that, for all $zin D$, the limit $limlimits_{h to 0} Releft(frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}{h}right)$ exists and is finite. Does this imply that $f$ is holomorphic on $D$?



This was a task on my exam today, which I didn't manage.






complex-analysis analytic-functions







share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    @MisterRiemann That example depends on if $hto 0$ has $h$ on the real line or complex. If $h$ is complex, that would reduce to $\lim_{hto . 0}frac{overline h}{h}=c_z,$ but this limit doesn't converge.
    – Thomas Andrews
    Nov 29 '18 at 20:11










  • @ThomasAndrews Good point, thanks for the remark. I shall remove the comment.
    – MisterRiemann
    Nov 29 '18 at 20:12












  • h is complex of course
    – ryszard eggink
    Nov 29 '18 at 20:13
















1














Assume $f$ is defined on some domain $Dsubsetmathbb C$, differentiable on $D$ as a function of two real variables, and that, for all $zin D$, the limit $limlimits_{h to 0} Releft(frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}{h}right)$ exists and is finite. Does this imply that $f$ is holomorphic on $D$?



This was a task on my exam today, which I didn't manage.






complex-analysis analytic-functions







share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    @MisterRiemann That example depends on if $hto 0$ has $h$ on the real line or complex. If $h$ is complex, that would reduce to $\lim_{hto . 0}frac{overline h}{h}=c_z,$ but this limit doesn't converge.
    – Thomas Andrews
    Nov 29 '18 at 20:11










  • @ThomasAndrews Good point, thanks for the remark. I shall remove the comment.
    – MisterRiemann
    Nov 29 '18 at 20:12












  • h is complex of course
    – ryszard eggink
    Nov 29 '18 at 20:13














1












1








1







Assume $f$ is defined on some domain $Dsubsetmathbb C$, differentiable on $D$ as a function of two real variables, and that, for all $zin D$, the limit $limlimits_{h to 0} Releft(frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}{h}right)$ exists and is finite. Does this imply that $f$ is holomorphic on $D$?



This was a task on my exam today, which I didn't manage.






complex-analysis analytic-functions







share|cite|improve this question















Assume $f$ is defined on some domain $Dsubsetmathbb C$, differentiable on $D$ as a function of two real variables, and that, for all $zin D$, the limit $limlimits_{h to 0} Releft(frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}{h}right)$ exists and is finite. Does this imply that $f$ is holomorphic on $D$?



This was a task on my exam today, which I didn't manage.






complex-analysis analytic-functions




complex-analysis analytic-functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 29 '18 at 21:42









Did

246k23221456




246k23221456










asked Nov 29 '18 at 20:06









ryszard egginkryszard eggink

303110




303110








  • 1




    @MisterRiemann That example depends on if $hto 0$ has $h$ on the real line or complex. If $h$ is complex, that would reduce to $\lim_{hto . 0}frac{overline h}{h}=c_z,$ but this limit doesn't converge.
    – Thomas Andrews
    Nov 29 '18 at 20:11










  • @ThomasAndrews Good point, thanks for the remark. I shall remove the comment.
    – MisterRiemann
    Nov 29 '18 at 20:12












  • h is complex of course
    – ryszard eggink
    Nov 29 '18 at 20:13














  • 1




    @MisterRiemann That example depends on if $hto 0$ has $h$ on the real line or complex. If $h$ is complex, that would reduce to $\lim_{hto . 0}frac{overline h}{h}=c_z,$ but this limit doesn't converge.
    – Thomas Andrews
    Nov 29 '18 at 20:11










  • @ThomasAndrews Good point, thanks for the remark. I shall remove the comment.
    – MisterRiemann
    Nov 29 '18 at 20:12












  • h is complex of course
    – ryszard eggink
    Nov 29 '18 at 20:13








1




1




@MisterRiemann That example depends on if $hto 0$ has $h$ on the real line or complex. If $h$ is complex, that would reduce to $\lim_{hto . 0}frac{overline h}{h}=c_z,$ but this limit doesn't converge.
– Thomas Andrews
Nov 29 '18 at 20:11




@MisterRiemann That example depends on if $hto 0$ has $h$ on the real line or complex. If $h$ is complex, that would reduce to $\lim_{hto . 0}frac{overline h}{h}=c_z,$ but this limit doesn't converge.
– Thomas Andrews
Nov 29 '18 at 20:11












@ThomasAndrews Good point, thanks for the remark. I shall remove the comment.
– MisterRiemann
Nov 29 '18 at 20:12






@ThomasAndrews Good point, thanks for the remark. I shall remove the comment.
– MisterRiemann
Nov 29 '18 at 20:12














h is complex of course
– ryszard eggink
Nov 29 '18 at 20:13




h is complex of course
– ryszard eggink
Nov 29 '18 at 20:13










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4














Let us fix some $z$ in $D$ and use the notations $$h=r+isqquad f_x(z)=a+ibqquad f_y(z)=c+id$$ for some real numbers $r$, $s$, $a$, $b$, $c$ and $d$. Then the $mathbb R^2$-differentiability of the function $f$ at $z$ reads, in the limit $hto0$ or, equivalently, in the limit $(r,s)to(0,0)$, $$f(z+h)-f(z)=(a+ib)r+(c+id)s+o(|h|)$$
that is,
$$frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}h=frac{(f(z+h)-f(z))bar h}{|h|^2}=frac{((a+ib)r+(c+id)s)(r-is)}{r^2+s^2}+o(1)$$
Thus, the hypothesis is exactly the existence of the limit
$$lim_{(r,s)to(0,0)}frac{ar^2+(b+c)rs+ds^2}{r^2+s^2}$$ Considering the limits of this ratio when $rto0$ along the lines $s=rt$, for each $t$ fixed, one sees that $$frac{a+(b+c)t+dt^2}{1+t^2}$$ should be independent of $t$. In particular, the cases $t=0$ and $ttoinfty$ yield the condition $$a=d$$ and the cases $t=pm1$ yield the condition $$b+c=0$$ Since these are Cauchy-Riemann equations for $f$ at $z$, the proof is complete.






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    (+1) Clear and concise. Well written.
    – Mark Viola
    Nov 30 '18 at 4:41











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019128%2fif-f-is-mathbb-r2-differentiable-and-the-limit-lim-limits-h-to-0-re%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














Let us fix some $z$ in $D$ and use the notations $$h=r+isqquad f_x(z)=a+ibqquad f_y(z)=c+id$$ for some real numbers $r$, $s$, $a$, $b$, $c$ and $d$. Then the $mathbb R^2$-differentiability of the function $f$ at $z$ reads, in the limit $hto0$ or, equivalently, in the limit $(r,s)to(0,0)$, $$f(z+h)-f(z)=(a+ib)r+(c+id)s+o(|h|)$$
that is,
$$frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}h=frac{(f(z+h)-f(z))bar h}{|h|^2}=frac{((a+ib)r+(c+id)s)(r-is)}{r^2+s^2}+o(1)$$
Thus, the hypothesis is exactly the existence of the limit
$$lim_{(r,s)to(0,0)}frac{ar^2+(b+c)rs+ds^2}{r^2+s^2}$$ Considering the limits of this ratio when $rto0$ along the lines $s=rt$, for each $t$ fixed, one sees that $$frac{a+(b+c)t+dt^2}{1+t^2}$$ should be independent of $t$. In particular, the cases $t=0$ and $ttoinfty$ yield the condition $$a=d$$ and the cases $t=pm1$ yield the condition $$b+c=0$$ Since these are Cauchy-Riemann equations for $f$ at $z$, the proof is complete.






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    (+1) Clear and concise. Well written.
    – Mark Viola
    Nov 30 '18 at 4:41
















4














Let us fix some $z$ in $D$ and use the notations $$h=r+isqquad f_x(z)=a+ibqquad f_y(z)=c+id$$ for some real numbers $r$, $s$, $a$, $b$, $c$ and $d$. Then the $mathbb R^2$-differentiability of the function $f$ at $z$ reads, in the limit $hto0$ or, equivalently, in the limit $(r,s)to(0,0)$, $$f(z+h)-f(z)=(a+ib)r+(c+id)s+o(|h|)$$
that is,
$$frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}h=frac{(f(z+h)-f(z))bar h}{|h|^2}=frac{((a+ib)r+(c+id)s)(r-is)}{r^2+s^2}+o(1)$$
Thus, the hypothesis is exactly the existence of the limit
$$lim_{(r,s)to(0,0)}frac{ar^2+(b+c)rs+ds^2}{r^2+s^2}$$ Considering the limits of this ratio when $rto0$ along the lines $s=rt$, for each $t$ fixed, one sees that $$frac{a+(b+c)t+dt^2}{1+t^2}$$ should be independent of $t$. In particular, the cases $t=0$ and $ttoinfty$ yield the condition $$a=d$$ and the cases $t=pm1$ yield the condition $$b+c=0$$ Since these are Cauchy-Riemann equations for $f$ at $z$, the proof is complete.






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    (+1) Clear and concise. Well written.
    – Mark Viola
    Nov 30 '18 at 4:41














4












4








4






Let us fix some $z$ in $D$ and use the notations $$h=r+isqquad f_x(z)=a+ibqquad f_y(z)=c+id$$ for some real numbers $r$, $s$, $a$, $b$, $c$ and $d$. Then the $mathbb R^2$-differentiability of the function $f$ at $z$ reads, in the limit $hto0$ or, equivalently, in the limit $(r,s)to(0,0)$, $$f(z+h)-f(z)=(a+ib)r+(c+id)s+o(|h|)$$
that is,
$$frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}h=frac{(f(z+h)-f(z))bar h}{|h|^2}=frac{((a+ib)r+(c+id)s)(r-is)}{r^2+s^2}+o(1)$$
Thus, the hypothesis is exactly the existence of the limit
$$lim_{(r,s)to(0,0)}frac{ar^2+(b+c)rs+ds^2}{r^2+s^2}$$ Considering the limits of this ratio when $rto0$ along the lines $s=rt$, for each $t$ fixed, one sees that $$frac{a+(b+c)t+dt^2}{1+t^2}$$ should be independent of $t$. In particular, the cases $t=0$ and $ttoinfty$ yield the condition $$a=d$$ and the cases $t=pm1$ yield the condition $$b+c=0$$ Since these are Cauchy-Riemann equations for $f$ at $z$, the proof is complete.






share|cite|improve this answer














Let us fix some $z$ in $D$ and use the notations $$h=r+isqquad f_x(z)=a+ibqquad f_y(z)=c+id$$ for some real numbers $r$, $s$, $a$, $b$, $c$ and $d$. Then the $mathbb R^2$-differentiability of the function $f$ at $z$ reads, in the limit $hto0$ or, equivalently, in the limit $(r,s)to(0,0)$, $$f(z+h)-f(z)=(a+ib)r+(c+id)s+o(|h|)$$
that is,
$$frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}h=frac{(f(z+h)-f(z))bar h}{|h|^2}=frac{((a+ib)r+(c+id)s)(r-is)}{r^2+s^2}+o(1)$$
Thus, the hypothesis is exactly the existence of the limit
$$lim_{(r,s)to(0,0)}frac{ar^2+(b+c)rs+ds^2}{r^2+s^2}$$ Considering the limits of this ratio when $rto0$ along the lines $s=rt$, for each $t$ fixed, one sees that $$frac{a+(b+c)t+dt^2}{1+t^2}$$ should be independent of $t$. In particular, the cases $t=0$ and $ttoinfty$ yield the condition $$a=d$$ and the cases $t=pm1$ yield the condition $$b+c=0$$ Since these are Cauchy-Riemann equations for $f$ at $z$, the proof is complete.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 1 '18 at 14:12

























answered Nov 29 '18 at 21:41









DidDid

246k23221456




246k23221456








  • 1




    (+1) Clear and concise. Well written.
    – Mark Viola
    Nov 30 '18 at 4:41














  • 1




    (+1) Clear and concise. Well written.
    – Mark Viola
    Nov 30 '18 at 4:41








1




1




(+1) Clear and concise. Well written.
– Mark Viola
Nov 30 '18 at 4:41




(+1) Clear and concise. Well written.
– Mark Viola
Nov 30 '18 at 4:41


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019128%2fif-f-is-mathbb-r2-differentiable-and-the-limit-lim-limits-h-to-0-re%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Bundesstraße 106

Image
Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück
Read more

Verónica Boquete

Image
Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl
Read more

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

Image
Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich
Read more