If $Hleq G$ and $G-H$ is finite, then $G=H$ or $G$ is finite.












2















I'm trying to prove that if $Hleq G$ and $G-H$ is finite, then $G=H$ or $G$ is finite.




It is clear that if $|G-H|=0$ then $G=H$; otherwise, if $0<|G-H|=n<infty$ then $|G:H|leq|G-H|$.



The problem is that I can't find out how to use this fact to work out the proof.



Maybe this is not the right approach, so I would appreciate some hints, please.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 3




    Use that $G$ is a union of cosets of $H$, and that $H$ is itself such a coset. Draw a picture.
    – Myself
    Dec 2 '15 at 22:19








  • 1




    @Myself Oh, ok. It wasn't that hard. Thanks!
    – Jose Paternina
    Dec 2 '15 at 22:27










  • Here is a discussion of what I have so far.
    – Shaun
    Nov 29 '18 at 20:52






  • 1




    @Shaun The complement contains representatives for all but one coset as well as at least one full coset. So there are finitely many cosets and they are all finite.
    – Tobias Kildetoft
    Nov 29 '18 at 21:39










  • Ah, I see! Thank you, @TobiasKildetoft. Would you mind posting that as an answer, please? It's just that it checks the question off the list of unanswered questions. If you don't want to, I'll copy & paste your comment as a community wiki answer (unless you have any objections) $ddotsmile$
    – Shaun
    Nov 29 '18 at 21:45
















2















I'm trying to prove that if $Hleq G$ and $G-H$ is finite, then $G=H$ or $G$ is finite.




It is clear that if $|G-H|=0$ then $G=H$; otherwise, if $0<|G-H|=n<infty$ then $|G:H|leq|G-H|$.



The problem is that I can't find out how to use this fact to work out the proof.



Maybe this is not the right approach, so I would appreciate some hints, please.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 3




    Use that $G$ is a union of cosets of $H$, and that $H$ is itself such a coset. Draw a picture.
    – Myself
    Dec 2 '15 at 22:19








  • 1




    @Myself Oh, ok. It wasn't that hard. Thanks!
    – Jose Paternina
    Dec 2 '15 at 22:27










  • Here is a discussion of what I have so far.
    – Shaun
    Nov 29 '18 at 20:52






  • 1




    @Shaun The complement contains representatives for all but one coset as well as at least one full coset. So there are finitely many cosets and they are all finite.
    – Tobias Kildetoft
    Nov 29 '18 at 21:39










  • Ah, I see! Thank you, @TobiasKildetoft. Would you mind posting that as an answer, please? It's just that it checks the question off the list of unanswered questions. If you don't want to, I'll copy & paste your comment as a community wiki answer (unless you have any objections) $ddotsmile$
    – Shaun
    Nov 29 '18 at 21:45














2












2








2


1






I'm trying to prove that if $Hleq G$ and $G-H$ is finite, then $G=H$ or $G$ is finite.




It is clear that if $|G-H|=0$ then $G=H$; otherwise, if $0<|G-H|=n<infty$ then $|G:H|leq|G-H|$.



The problem is that I can't find out how to use this fact to work out the proof.



Maybe this is not the right approach, so I would appreciate some hints, please.










share|cite|improve this question
















I'm trying to prove that if $Hleq G$ and $G-H$ is finite, then $G=H$ or $G$ is finite.




It is clear that if $|G-H|=0$ then $G=H$; otherwise, if $0<|G-H|=n<infty$ then $|G:H|leq|G-H|$.



The problem is that I can't find out how to use this fact to work out the proof.



Maybe this is not the right approach, so I would appreciate some hints, please.







group-theory finite-groups






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 29 '18 at 21:46









Shaun

8,820113681




8,820113681










asked Dec 2 '15 at 22:17









Jose PaterninaJose Paternina

660414




660414








  • 3




    Use that $G$ is a union of cosets of $H$, and that $H$ is itself such a coset. Draw a picture.
    – Myself
    Dec 2 '15 at 22:19








  • 1




    @Myself Oh, ok. It wasn't that hard. Thanks!
    – Jose Paternina
    Dec 2 '15 at 22:27










  • Here is a discussion of what I have so far.
    – Shaun
    Nov 29 '18 at 20:52






  • 1




    @Shaun The complement contains representatives for all but one coset as well as at least one full coset. So there are finitely many cosets and they are all finite.
    – Tobias Kildetoft
    Nov 29 '18 at 21:39










  • Ah, I see! Thank you, @TobiasKildetoft. Would you mind posting that as an answer, please? It's just that it checks the question off the list of unanswered questions. If you don't want to, I'll copy & paste your comment as a community wiki answer (unless you have any objections) $ddotsmile$
    – Shaun
    Nov 29 '18 at 21:45














  • 3




    Use that $G$ is a union of cosets of $H$, and that $H$ is itself such a coset. Draw a picture.
    – Myself
    Dec 2 '15 at 22:19








  • 1




    @Myself Oh, ok. It wasn't that hard. Thanks!
    – Jose Paternina
    Dec 2 '15 at 22:27










  • Here is a discussion of what I have so far.
    – Shaun
    Nov 29 '18 at 20:52






  • 1




    @Shaun The complement contains representatives for all but one coset as well as at least one full coset. So there are finitely many cosets and they are all finite.
    – Tobias Kildetoft
    Nov 29 '18 at 21:39










  • Ah, I see! Thank you, @TobiasKildetoft. Would you mind posting that as an answer, please? It's just that it checks the question off the list of unanswered questions. If you don't want to, I'll copy & paste your comment as a community wiki answer (unless you have any objections) $ddotsmile$
    – Shaun
    Nov 29 '18 at 21:45








3




3




Use that $G$ is a union of cosets of $H$, and that $H$ is itself such a coset. Draw a picture.
– Myself
Dec 2 '15 at 22:19






Use that $G$ is a union of cosets of $H$, and that $H$ is itself such a coset. Draw a picture.
– Myself
Dec 2 '15 at 22:19






1




1




@Myself Oh, ok. It wasn't that hard. Thanks!
– Jose Paternina
Dec 2 '15 at 22:27




@Myself Oh, ok. It wasn't that hard. Thanks!
– Jose Paternina
Dec 2 '15 at 22:27












Here is a discussion of what I have so far.
– Shaun
Nov 29 '18 at 20:52




Here is a discussion of what I have so far.
– Shaun
Nov 29 '18 at 20:52




1




1




@Shaun The complement contains representatives for all but one coset as well as at least one full coset. So there are finitely many cosets and they are all finite.
– Tobias Kildetoft
Nov 29 '18 at 21:39




@Shaun The complement contains representatives for all but one coset as well as at least one full coset. So there are finitely many cosets and they are all finite.
– Tobias Kildetoft
Nov 29 '18 at 21:39












Ah, I see! Thank you, @TobiasKildetoft. Would you mind posting that as an answer, please? It's just that it checks the question off the list of unanswered questions. If you don't want to, I'll copy & paste your comment as a community wiki answer (unless you have any objections) $ddotsmile$
– Shaun
Nov 29 '18 at 21:45




Ah, I see! Thank you, @TobiasKildetoft. Would you mind posting that as an answer, please? It's just that it checks the question off the list of unanswered questions. If you don't want to, I'll copy & paste your comment as a community wiki answer (unless you have any objections) $ddotsmile$
– Shaun
Nov 29 '18 at 21:45










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














Let us assume that $Hneq G$ and show that then $G$ is finite.



Since the complement of $H$ in $G$ contains representatives of all but one of the cosets of $H$ in $G$ (missing only the coset $H$), there are finitely many cosets of $H$ in $G$.



But the complement also contains at least one full coset, so this coset is finite and hence all cosets are finite.



Since $G$ is the union of these finitely many finite cosets, it is itself finite.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1557248%2fif-h-leq-g-and-g-h-is-finite-then-g-h-or-g-is-finite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    Let us assume that $Hneq G$ and show that then $G$ is finite.



    Since the complement of $H$ in $G$ contains representatives of all but one of the cosets of $H$ in $G$ (missing only the coset $H$), there are finitely many cosets of $H$ in $G$.



    But the complement also contains at least one full coset, so this coset is finite and hence all cosets are finite.



    Since $G$ is the union of these finitely many finite cosets, it is itself finite.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      2














      Let us assume that $Hneq G$ and show that then $G$ is finite.



      Since the complement of $H$ in $G$ contains representatives of all but one of the cosets of $H$ in $G$ (missing only the coset $H$), there are finitely many cosets of $H$ in $G$.



      But the complement also contains at least one full coset, so this coset is finite and hence all cosets are finite.



      Since $G$ is the union of these finitely many finite cosets, it is itself finite.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        2












        2








        2






        Let us assume that $Hneq G$ and show that then $G$ is finite.



        Since the complement of $H$ in $G$ contains representatives of all but one of the cosets of $H$ in $G$ (missing only the coset $H$), there are finitely many cosets of $H$ in $G$.



        But the complement also contains at least one full coset, so this coset is finite and hence all cosets are finite.



        Since $G$ is the union of these finitely many finite cosets, it is itself finite.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Let us assume that $Hneq G$ and show that then $G$ is finite.



        Since the complement of $H$ in $G$ contains representatives of all but one of the cosets of $H$ in $G$ (missing only the coset $H$), there are finitely many cosets of $H$ in $G$.



        But the complement also contains at least one full coset, so this coset is finite and hence all cosets are finite.



        Since $G$ is the union of these finitely many finite cosets, it is itself finite.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 30 '18 at 7:39









        Tobias KildetoftTobias Kildetoft

        16.7k14273




        16.7k14273






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1557248%2fif-h-leq-g-and-g-h-is-finite-then-g-h-or-g-is-finite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Verónica Boquete

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten