Why isn't “a single + noun” a tautological repeat?












1














By definition,




single means

(1) : consisting of or having only one part, feature, or portion



(2) : consisting of one as opposed to or in contrast with many



(3) : consisting of only one in number



by Merriam-Webster




So why do we still say




"a single rose"



"hold to a single ideal"




Not




"single rose"



"hold to single ideal"











share|improve this question





























    1














    By definition,




    single means

    (1) : consisting of or having only one part, feature, or portion



    (2) : consisting of one as opposed to or in contrast with many



    (3) : consisting of only one in number



    by Merriam-Webster




    So why do we still say




    "a single rose"



    "hold to a single ideal"




    Not




    "single rose"



    "hold to single ideal"











    share|improve this question



























      1












      1








      1







      By definition,




      single means

      (1) : consisting of or having only one part, feature, or portion



      (2) : consisting of one as opposed to or in contrast with many



      (3) : consisting of only one in number



      by Merriam-Webster




      So why do we still say




      "a single rose"



      "hold to a single ideal"




      Not




      "single rose"



      "hold to single ideal"











      share|improve this question















      By definition,




      single means

      (1) : consisting of or having only one part, feature, or portion



      (2) : consisting of one as opposed to or in contrast with many



      (3) : consisting of only one in number



      by Merriam-Webster




      So why do we still say




      "a single rose"



      "hold to a single ideal"




      Not




      "single rose"



      "hold to single ideal"








      word-usage






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 13 mins ago









      Laurel

      4,92311127




      4,92311127










      asked 3 hours ago









      B ChenB Chen

      2771211




      2771211






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          Repetition can be used for emphasis.



          The indefinite article "a" does imply that there is only one [thing](otherwise you would normally use no article and a plural noun). So maybe you could say "single" is redundant in some sentences. But people do use it for emphasis when they want to make an explicit point that there is only one [thing].



          Perhaps the word "single" could be left out in some situations, but the article "a" is a feature of the language, and you can't leave that word out (as you seem to suggest.) If you feel "a single" is repetitive, then leave out the "single". The "a" isn't optional.






          share|improve this answer





























            3














            Single serves the same role here that any other adjective would do, whether we are talking about a single rose, a solitary rose, a red rose or any other rose.



            Introducing an adjective to qualify the rose does not change the need for the article a (or the)



            The role of single is to emphasise that there are no other roses, not to replace the article.



            It makes the difference between statements such as:




            a pupil raised her hand

            and
            a single pupil raised her hand.




            The adjective changes the nuance. The emphasis moves from the raising of the hand to the fact that only a single pupil does so. The same is true for saying a rose stood in the vase and a single rose stood in the vase.



            The same rule applies regardless of whether you are talking about a rose, an ideal or any other noun.






            share|improve this answer





























              0














              We can say things like "six single roses" to mean something like six roses, but none of them grouped together. Since there's nothing redundant about "six single roses", there's nothing redundant about "one single rose" or "a single rose".



              It's hard to describe the meaning of "single" without using the word "one". However, that doesn't mean that the adjective "single" is a good determiner. We use some other word to fill the determiner role when that role is appropriate: a single rose, the single rose, this single rose, whichever single rose, and so on.





              share





















                Your Answer








                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "481"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: false,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: null,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192464%2fwhy-isnt-a-single-noun-a-tautological-repeat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes








                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                3














                Repetition can be used for emphasis.



                The indefinite article "a" does imply that there is only one [thing](otherwise you would normally use no article and a plural noun). So maybe you could say "single" is redundant in some sentences. But people do use it for emphasis when they want to make an explicit point that there is only one [thing].



                Perhaps the word "single" could be left out in some situations, but the article "a" is a feature of the language, and you can't leave that word out (as you seem to suggest.) If you feel "a single" is repetitive, then leave out the "single". The "a" isn't optional.






                share|improve this answer


























                  3














                  Repetition can be used for emphasis.



                  The indefinite article "a" does imply that there is only one [thing](otherwise you would normally use no article and a plural noun). So maybe you could say "single" is redundant in some sentences. But people do use it for emphasis when they want to make an explicit point that there is only one [thing].



                  Perhaps the word "single" could be left out in some situations, but the article "a" is a feature of the language, and you can't leave that word out (as you seem to suggest.) If you feel "a single" is repetitive, then leave out the "single". The "a" isn't optional.






                  share|improve this answer
























                    3












                    3








                    3






                    Repetition can be used for emphasis.



                    The indefinite article "a" does imply that there is only one [thing](otherwise you would normally use no article and a plural noun). So maybe you could say "single" is redundant in some sentences. But people do use it for emphasis when they want to make an explicit point that there is only one [thing].



                    Perhaps the word "single" could be left out in some situations, but the article "a" is a feature of the language, and you can't leave that word out (as you seem to suggest.) If you feel "a single" is repetitive, then leave out the "single". The "a" isn't optional.






                    share|improve this answer












                    Repetition can be used for emphasis.



                    The indefinite article "a" does imply that there is only one [thing](otherwise you would normally use no article and a plural noun). So maybe you could say "single" is redundant in some sentences. But people do use it for emphasis when they want to make an explicit point that there is only one [thing].



                    Perhaps the word "single" could be left out in some situations, but the article "a" is a feature of the language, and you can't leave that word out (as you seem to suggest.) If you feel "a single" is repetitive, then leave out the "single". The "a" isn't optional.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 2 hours ago









                    Lorel C.Lorel C.

                    1,21535




                    1,21535

























                        3














                        Single serves the same role here that any other adjective would do, whether we are talking about a single rose, a solitary rose, a red rose or any other rose.



                        Introducing an adjective to qualify the rose does not change the need for the article a (or the)



                        The role of single is to emphasise that there are no other roses, not to replace the article.



                        It makes the difference between statements such as:




                        a pupil raised her hand

                        and
                        a single pupil raised her hand.




                        The adjective changes the nuance. The emphasis moves from the raising of the hand to the fact that only a single pupil does so. The same is true for saying a rose stood in the vase and a single rose stood in the vase.



                        The same rule applies regardless of whether you are talking about a rose, an ideal or any other noun.






                        share|improve this answer


























                          3














                          Single serves the same role here that any other adjective would do, whether we are talking about a single rose, a solitary rose, a red rose or any other rose.



                          Introducing an adjective to qualify the rose does not change the need for the article a (or the)



                          The role of single is to emphasise that there are no other roses, not to replace the article.



                          It makes the difference between statements such as:




                          a pupil raised her hand

                          and
                          a single pupil raised her hand.




                          The adjective changes the nuance. The emphasis moves from the raising of the hand to the fact that only a single pupil does so. The same is true for saying a rose stood in the vase and a single rose stood in the vase.



                          The same rule applies regardless of whether you are talking about a rose, an ideal or any other noun.






                          share|improve this answer
























                            3












                            3








                            3






                            Single serves the same role here that any other adjective would do, whether we are talking about a single rose, a solitary rose, a red rose or any other rose.



                            Introducing an adjective to qualify the rose does not change the need for the article a (or the)



                            The role of single is to emphasise that there are no other roses, not to replace the article.



                            It makes the difference between statements such as:




                            a pupil raised her hand

                            and
                            a single pupil raised her hand.




                            The adjective changes the nuance. The emphasis moves from the raising of the hand to the fact that only a single pupil does so. The same is true for saying a rose stood in the vase and a single rose stood in the vase.



                            The same rule applies regardless of whether you are talking about a rose, an ideal or any other noun.






                            share|improve this answer












                            Single serves the same role here that any other adjective would do, whether we are talking about a single rose, a solitary rose, a red rose or any other rose.



                            Introducing an adjective to qualify the rose does not change the need for the article a (or the)



                            The role of single is to emphasise that there are no other roses, not to replace the article.



                            It makes the difference between statements such as:




                            a pupil raised her hand

                            and
                            a single pupil raised her hand.




                            The adjective changes the nuance. The emphasis moves from the raising of the hand to the fact that only a single pupil does so. The same is true for saying a rose stood in the vase and a single rose stood in the vase.



                            The same rule applies regardless of whether you are talking about a rose, an ideal or any other noun.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 2 hours ago









                            Ronald SoleRonald Sole

                            9,90411019




                            9,90411019























                                0














                                We can say things like "six single roses" to mean something like six roses, but none of them grouped together. Since there's nothing redundant about "six single roses", there's nothing redundant about "one single rose" or "a single rose".



                                It's hard to describe the meaning of "single" without using the word "one". However, that doesn't mean that the adjective "single" is a good determiner. We use some other word to fill the determiner role when that role is appropriate: a single rose, the single rose, this single rose, whichever single rose, and so on.





                                share


























                                  0














                                  We can say things like "six single roses" to mean something like six roses, but none of them grouped together. Since there's nothing redundant about "six single roses", there's nothing redundant about "one single rose" or "a single rose".



                                  It's hard to describe the meaning of "single" without using the word "one". However, that doesn't mean that the adjective "single" is a good determiner. We use some other word to fill the determiner role when that role is appropriate: a single rose, the single rose, this single rose, whichever single rose, and so on.





                                  share
























                                    0












                                    0








                                    0






                                    We can say things like "six single roses" to mean something like six roses, but none of them grouped together. Since there's nothing redundant about "six single roses", there's nothing redundant about "one single rose" or "a single rose".



                                    It's hard to describe the meaning of "single" without using the word "one". However, that doesn't mean that the adjective "single" is a good determiner. We use some other word to fill the determiner role when that role is appropriate: a single rose, the single rose, this single rose, whichever single rose, and so on.





                                    share












                                    We can say things like "six single roses" to mean something like six roses, but none of them grouped together. Since there's nothing redundant about "six single roses", there's nothing redundant about "one single rose" or "a single rose".



                                    It's hard to describe the meaning of "single" without using the word "one". However, that doesn't mean that the adjective "single" is a good determiner. We use some other word to fill the determiner role when that role is appropriate: a single rose, the single rose, this single rose, whichever single rose, and so on.






                                    share











                                    share


                                    share










                                    answered 9 mins ago









                                    Gary BotnovcanGary Botnovcan

                                    9,099927




                                    9,099927






























                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded




















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid



                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                        Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                        Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid



                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192464%2fwhy-isnt-a-single-noun-a-tautological-repeat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Le Mesnil-Réaume

                                        Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

                                        web3.py web3.isConnected() returns false always