Derivation of Markov's Inequality
$begingroup$
I have some problems understanding the derivation of Markov's inequality.
$$
begin{align}
EX &= int_{-infty}^{infty} xf_X(x)text{d}x \
&= int_{0}^infty xf_X(x)text{d}x & text{since } Xgt 0\
&geq int_{a}^infty xf_X(x)text{d}x &text{ for any }a gt 0\
&geqint_{a}^infty af_X(x)text{d}x & text{since } x > atext{ in the integrated region.}
end{align}
$$
I don't understand the last step. Didn't we already use the fact that we were integrating over a larger region to write the inequality in the third line? Can someone help me with the difference?
probability inequality
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have some problems understanding the derivation of Markov's inequality.
$$
begin{align}
EX &= int_{-infty}^{infty} xf_X(x)text{d}x \
&= int_{0}^infty xf_X(x)text{d}x & text{since } Xgt 0\
&geq int_{a}^infty xf_X(x)text{d}x &text{ for any }a gt 0\
&geqint_{a}^infty af_X(x)text{d}x & text{since } x > atext{ in the integrated region.}
end{align}
$$
I don't understand the last step. Didn't we already use the fact that we were integrating over a larger region to write the inequality in the third line? Can someone help me with the difference?
probability inequality
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have some problems understanding the derivation of Markov's inequality.
$$
begin{align}
EX &= int_{-infty}^{infty} xf_X(x)text{d}x \
&= int_{0}^infty xf_X(x)text{d}x & text{since } Xgt 0\
&geq int_{a}^infty xf_X(x)text{d}x &text{ for any }a gt 0\
&geqint_{a}^infty af_X(x)text{d}x & text{since } x > atext{ in the integrated region.}
end{align}
$$
I don't understand the last step. Didn't we already use the fact that we were integrating over a larger region to write the inequality in the third line? Can someone help me with the difference?
probability inequality
$endgroup$
I have some problems understanding the derivation of Markov's inequality.
$$
begin{align}
EX &= int_{-infty}^{infty} xf_X(x)text{d}x \
&= int_{0}^infty xf_X(x)text{d}x & text{since } Xgt 0\
&geq int_{a}^infty xf_X(x)text{d}x &text{ for any }a gt 0\
&geqint_{a}^infty af_X(x)text{d}x & text{since } x > atext{ in the integrated region.}
end{align}
$$
I don't understand the last step. Didn't we already use the fact that we were integrating over a larger region to write the inequality in the third line? Can someone help me with the difference?
probability inequality
probability inequality
edited Dec 13 '18 at 19:06
Mutantoe
612513
612513
asked Dec 13 '18 at 9:28
ChristianChristian
388
388
add a comment |
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We could be more verbose in the third step as follows: Let $a > 0$. Then
$$int_0^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x = int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x + int_0^a x f_X (x) text{d} x.$$
Now, since $f_X(x) geq 0$ and $xgeq 0 $ for $xin [0,a]$ we have that $int_0^a x f_X (x) text{d} x geq 0$ (This is where integrating over a larger/smaller region with a postitive integrand plays a role). Therefore
$$int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x + int_0^a x f_X (x) text{d} x geq int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x + 0 = int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x$$
Now let us take a look on the last step: Here we want to use that for $xin[a,infty )$ we have $x geq a$ and therefore it holds that $x f_X (x) geq a f_X (x)$ (Here we just used that over our integral region we have a lower bound of the integrand). Altogether
$$int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x geq int_a^infty a f_X (x) text{d} x = a int_a^infty f_X (x) text{d} x$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$ f geq g$ implies $int f geq int g$. Integrate $x f(x) I_{(a,infty)} geq a f(x) I_{(a,infty)}$ to get the last step.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The last step applies: $$forall x;[0leq u(x)leq v(x)]impliesint u(x);dxleqint v(x);dx$$ This for $u(x)=af_X(x)mathbf1_{(a,infty)}(x)$ and $v(x)=xf_X(x)mathbf1_{(a,infty)}(x)$ where $ageq0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The last step uses the fact that the function
begin{align} g : [a,infty) rightarrow [0, infty)\
x mapsto x f_X(x)
end{align}
is always larger than
begin{align} h : [a,infty) rightarrow [0, infty)\
x mapsto a f_X(x)
end{align}
for (a > 0) in its domain. As you correctly state, the proof uses the fact that you integrate a non-negative function over a smaller region in the second-to-last inequality, not in the last inequality.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, there is a difference. Second to third step uses the fact that
$int_0^infty xf_X(x)dx = int_0^a xf_X(x)dx+int_a^infty xf_X(x)dx$
And
$int_0^a xf_X(x) dx>0$
Last step uses that $int_a^infty xf_X(x)dx>int_a^infty af_X(x)dx$, because $x>a$ in these limits of integration
Hope it is helpful
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037798%2fderivation-of-markovs-inequality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We could be more verbose in the third step as follows: Let $a > 0$. Then
$$int_0^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x = int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x + int_0^a x f_X (x) text{d} x.$$
Now, since $f_X(x) geq 0$ and $xgeq 0 $ for $xin [0,a]$ we have that $int_0^a x f_X (x) text{d} x geq 0$ (This is where integrating over a larger/smaller region with a postitive integrand plays a role). Therefore
$$int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x + int_0^a x f_X (x) text{d} x geq int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x + 0 = int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x$$
Now let us take a look on the last step: Here we want to use that for $xin[a,infty )$ we have $x geq a$ and therefore it holds that $x f_X (x) geq a f_X (x)$ (Here we just used that over our integral region we have a lower bound of the integrand). Altogether
$$int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x geq int_a^infty a f_X (x) text{d} x = a int_a^infty f_X (x) text{d} x$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We could be more verbose in the third step as follows: Let $a > 0$. Then
$$int_0^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x = int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x + int_0^a x f_X (x) text{d} x.$$
Now, since $f_X(x) geq 0$ and $xgeq 0 $ for $xin [0,a]$ we have that $int_0^a x f_X (x) text{d} x geq 0$ (This is where integrating over a larger/smaller region with a postitive integrand plays a role). Therefore
$$int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x + int_0^a x f_X (x) text{d} x geq int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x + 0 = int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x$$
Now let us take a look on the last step: Here we want to use that for $xin[a,infty )$ we have $x geq a$ and therefore it holds that $x f_X (x) geq a f_X (x)$ (Here we just used that over our integral region we have a lower bound of the integrand). Altogether
$$int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x geq int_a^infty a f_X (x) text{d} x = a int_a^infty f_X (x) text{d} x$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We could be more verbose in the third step as follows: Let $a > 0$. Then
$$int_0^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x = int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x + int_0^a x f_X (x) text{d} x.$$
Now, since $f_X(x) geq 0$ and $xgeq 0 $ for $xin [0,a]$ we have that $int_0^a x f_X (x) text{d} x geq 0$ (This is where integrating over a larger/smaller region with a postitive integrand plays a role). Therefore
$$int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x + int_0^a x f_X (x) text{d} x geq int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x + 0 = int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x$$
Now let us take a look on the last step: Here we want to use that for $xin[a,infty )$ we have $x geq a$ and therefore it holds that $x f_X (x) geq a f_X (x)$ (Here we just used that over our integral region we have a lower bound of the integrand). Altogether
$$int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x geq int_a^infty a f_X (x) text{d} x = a int_a^infty f_X (x) text{d} x$$
$endgroup$
We could be more verbose in the third step as follows: Let $a > 0$. Then
$$int_0^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x = int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x + int_0^a x f_X (x) text{d} x.$$
Now, since $f_X(x) geq 0$ and $xgeq 0 $ for $xin [0,a]$ we have that $int_0^a x f_X (x) text{d} x geq 0$ (This is where integrating over a larger/smaller region with a postitive integrand plays a role). Therefore
$$int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x + int_0^a x f_X (x) text{d} x geq int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x + 0 = int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x$$
Now let us take a look on the last step: Here we want to use that for $xin[a,infty )$ we have $x geq a$ and therefore it holds that $x f_X (x) geq a f_X (x)$ (Here we just used that over our integral region we have a lower bound of the integrand). Altogether
$$int_a^infty x f_X (x) text{d} x geq int_a^infty a f_X (x) text{d} x = a int_a^infty f_X (x) text{d} x$$
edited Dec 13 '18 at 20:31
Acccumulation
7,0272619
7,0272619
answered Dec 13 '18 at 9:46
FalrachFalrach
1,664223
1,664223
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$ f geq g$ implies $int f geq int g$. Integrate $x f(x) I_{(a,infty)} geq a f(x) I_{(a,infty)}$ to get the last step.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$ f geq g$ implies $int f geq int g$. Integrate $x f(x) I_{(a,infty)} geq a f(x) I_{(a,infty)}$ to get the last step.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$ f geq g$ implies $int f geq int g$. Integrate $x f(x) I_{(a,infty)} geq a f(x) I_{(a,infty)}$ to get the last step.
$endgroup$
$ f geq g$ implies $int f geq int g$. Integrate $x f(x) I_{(a,infty)} geq a f(x) I_{(a,infty)}$ to get the last step.
answered Dec 13 '18 at 9:42
Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy
62.9k42362
62.9k42362
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The last step applies: $$forall x;[0leq u(x)leq v(x)]impliesint u(x);dxleqint v(x);dx$$ This for $u(x)=af_X(x)mathbf1_{(a,infty)}(x)$ and $v(x)=xf_X(x)mathbf1_{(a,infty)}(x)$ where $ageq0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The last step applies: $$forall x;[0leq u(x)leq v(x)]impliesint u(x);dxleqint v(x);dx$$ This for $u(x)=af_X(x)mathbf1_{(a,infty)}(x)$ and $v(x)=xf_X(x)mathbf1_{(a,infty)}(x)$ where $ageq0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The last step applies: $$forall x;[0leq u(x)leq v(x)]impliesint u(x);dxleqint v(x);dx$$ This for $u(x)=af_X(x)mathbf1_{(a,infty)}(x)$ and $v(x)=xf_X(x)mathbf1_{(a,infty)}(x)$ where $ageq0$.
$endgroup$
The last step applies: $$forall x;[0leq u(x)leq v(x)]impliesint u(x);dxleqint v(x);dx$$ This for $u(x)=af_X(x)mathbf1_{(a,infty)}(x)$ and $v(x)=xf_X(x)mathbf1_{(a,infty)}(x)$ where $ageq0$.
edited Dec 13 '18 at 9:48
answered Dec 13 '18 at 9:41
drhabdrhab
102k545136
102k545136
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The last step uses the fact that the function
begin{align} g : [a,infty) rightarrow [0, infty)\
x mapsto x f_X(x)
end{align}
is always larger than
begin{align} h : [a,infty) rightarrow [0, infty)\
x mapsto a f_X(x)
end{align}
for (a > 0) in its domain. As you correctly state, the proof uses the fact that you integrate a non-negative function over a smaller region in the second-to-last inequality, not in the last inequality.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The last step uses the fact that the function
begin{align} g : [a,infty) rightarrow [0, infty)\
x mapsto x f_X(x)
end{align}
is always larger than
begin{align} h : [a,infty) rightarrow [0, infty)\
x mapsto a f_X(x)
end{align}
for (a > 0) in its domain. As you correctly state, the proof uses the fact that you integrate a non-negative function over a smaller region in the second-to-last inequality, not in the last inequality.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The last step uses the fact that the function
begin{align} g : [a,infty) rightarrow [0, infty)\
x mapsto x f_X(x)
end{align}
is always larger than
begin{align} h : [a,infty) rightarrow [0, infty)\
x mapsto a f_X(x)
end{align}
for (a > 0) in its domain. As you correctly state, the proof uses the fact that you integrate a non-negative function over a smaller region in the second-to-last inequality, not in the last inequality.
$endgroup$
The last step uses the fact that the function
begin{align} g : [a,infty) rightarrow [0, infty)\
x mapsto x f_X(x)
end{align}
is always larger than
begin{align} h : [a,infty) rightarrow [0, infty)\
x mapsto a f_X(x)
end{align}
for (a > 0) in its domain. As you correctly state, the proof uses the fact that you integrate a non-negative function over a smaller region in the second-to-last inequality, not in the last inequality.
answered Dec 13 '18 at 9:40
JonathanJonathan
16312
16312
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, there is a difference. Second to third step uses the fact that
$int_0^infty xf_X(x)dx = int_0^a xf_X(x)dx+int_a^infty xf_X(x)dx$
And
$int_0^a xf_X(x) dx>0$
Last step uses that $int_a^infty xf_X(x)dx>int_a^infty af_X(x)dx$, because $x>a$ in these limits of integration
Hope it is helpful
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, there is a difference. Second to third step uses the fact that
$int_0^infty xf_X(x)dx = int_0^a xf_X(x)dx+int_a^infty xf_X(x)dx$
And
$int_0^a xf_X(x) dx>0$
Last step uses that $int_a^infty xf_X(x)dx>int_a^infty af_X(x)dx$, because $x>a$ in these limits of integration
Hope it is helpful
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, there is a difference. Second to third step uses the fact that
$int_0^infty xf_X(x)dx = int_0^a xf_X(x)dx+int_a^infty xf_X(x)dx$
And
$int_0^a xf_X(x) dx>0$
Last step uses that $int_a^infty xf_X(x)dx>int_a^infty af_X(x)dx$, because $x>a$ in these limits of integration
Hope it is helpful
$endgroup$
No, there is a difference. Second to third step uses the fact that
$int_0^infty xf_X(x)dx = int_0^a xf_X(x)dx+int_a^infty xf_X(x)dx$
And
$int_0^a xf_X(x) dx>0$
Last step uses that $int_a^infty xf_X(x)dx>int_a^infty af_X(x)dx$, because $x>a$ in these limits of integration
Hope it is helpful
answered Dec 13 '18 at 9:47
MartundMartund
1,667213
1,667213
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037798%2fderivation-of-markovs-inequality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown