On a special kind of six dimensional vector subspace of $mathbb C^9$ related to the primitive $9$-th root of...
$begingroup$
Let $mu=e^{2pi i/9}$ . Let $u_j:=(mu^j,mu^{2j}, mu ^{3j},...,mu^{9j})^T in mathbb C^9$, for $j=1,...,9$.
Let $V$ be the vector subspace of $mathbb C^9$ spanned by ${u_2,u_3,u_4,u_5,u_6,u_7}$ .
I can show that there exists $A in M_{3 times 6} (mathbb C)$ such that
$V={(x_1,...,x_9)in mathbb C^9 : (x_3,x_6,x_9)^T = A (x_1,x_2,x_4,x_5,x_7,x_8)^T }$ .
If On a special kind of $6$-dimensional vector subspace of $mathbb C^9$ is true, then this $A$ is unique and it is of the form $A=begin{pmatrix} a_1 &a_2 &a_3&a_4&a_5&a_6 \ a_5&a_6&a_1&a_2&a_3&a_4 \ a_3&a_4&a_5&a_6&a_1&a_2 end{pmatrix}$.
Let $L$ be the smalles t subsfield of $mathbb C$ generated by the entries of $A$.
I can show that $L subseteq mathbb Q(mu) $ , and hence $L/mathbb Q$ is a Galois-extension.
My question is : What is the extension degree $[L : mathbb Q]$ ?
Since $[mathbb Q(mu):mathbb Q]=phi(9)=6$, so $[L:mathbb Q]=1,2,3, $ or $6$, but exactly which one is it ?
linear-algebra matrices field-theory galois-theory cyclotomic-fields
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $mu=e^{2pi i/9}$ . Let $u_j:=(mu^j,mu^{2j}, mu ^{3j},...,mu^{9j})^T in mathbb C^9$, for $j=1,...,9$.
Let $V$ be the vector subspace of $mathbb C^9$ spanned by ${u_2,u_3,u_4,u_5,u_6,u_7}$ .
I can show that there exists $A in M_{3 times 6} (mathbb C)$ such that
$V={(x_1,...,x_9)in mathbb C^9 : (x_3,x_6,x_9)^T = A (x_1,x_2,x_4,x_5,x_7,x_8)^T }$ .
If On a special kind of $6$-dimensional vector subspace of $mathbb C^9$ is true, then this $A$ is unique and it is of the form $A=begin{pmatrix} a_1 &a_2 &a_3&a_4&a_5&a_6 \ a_5&a_6&a_1&a_2&a_3&a_4 \ a_3&a_4&a_5&a_6&a_1&a_2 end{pmatrix}$.
Let $L$ be the smalles t subsfield of $mathbb C$ generated by the entries of $A$.
I can show that $L subseteq mathbb Q(mu) $ , and hence $L/mathbb Q$ is a Galois-extension.
My question is : What is the extension degree $[L : mathbb Q]$ ?
Since $[mathbb Q(mu):mathbb Q]=phi(9)=6$, so $[L:mathbb Q]=1,2,3, $ or $6$, but exactly which one is it ?
linear-algebra matrices field-theory galois-theory cyclotomic-fields
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Let $V$ be the $mathbb{Q}$ vector space spanned by $u_j, j in [2,7]$. Show it is isomorphic to $mathbb{Q}[mu]$. When looking at $x_n, gcd(n,9) = 1$, you are looking at $v in V mapsto ( sigma_1(v), ldots,sigma_6(v)) in W subset mathbb{Q}[mu]^6, sigma_l in Gal(mathbb{Q}[mu]/mathbb{Q})$ and again $W cong mathbb{Q}[mu]$. Then $A$ is a linear map $mathbb{Q}[mu]^6 to mathbb{Q}[mu^3]^3$ which can be defined over $mathbb{Q}$.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 14 '18 at 3:24
$begingroup$
@reuns: what is $W$ here again ... ? So what is the extension degree ?
$endgroup$
– user521337
Dec 14 '18 at 3:48
$begingroup$
Now that you know $Lsubseteq mathbb{Q}(mu)$ I think it would be better to replace $mathbb{C}$ by $mathbb{Q}(mu)$. (And I have done this before my next comment!)
$endgroup$
– ancientmathematician
Dec 14 '18 at 10:16
$begingroup$
I don't think I agree with @reuns . If $A$ is rational then $V$ will be closed under the operation of applying the Galois Group of $mathbb{Q}(mu)$ to the components of the vectors. Then as $u_2in V$ and $sigma: mumapstomu^2$ is an automorphism, we get that $sigma^{5}(u_2)=u_1$ must be in $V$ as well. But $u_1, u_2,dots, u_9$ are nine LI vectors, so we'd get that $V$ had dimension at least $7$ which it does not.
$endgroup$
– ancientmathematician
Dec 14 '18 at 10:22
$begingroup$
On the other hand $V$ is clearly closed under the automorphism $mumapstomu^{-1}$ ...
$endgroup$
– ancientmathematician
Dec 14 '18 at 10:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $mu=e^{2pi i/9}$ . Let $u_j:=(mu^j,mu^{2j}, mu ^{3j},...,mu^{9j})^T in mathbb C^9$, for $j=1,...,9$.
Let $V$ be the vector subspace of $mathbb C^9$ spanned by ${u_2,u_3,u_4,u_5,u_6,u_7}$ .
I can show that there exists $A in M_{3 times 6} (mathbb C)$ such that
$V={(x_1,...,x_9)in mathbb C^9 : (x_3,x_6,x_9)^T = A (x_1,x_2,x_4,x_5,x_7,x_8)^T }$ .
If On a special kind of $6$-dimensional vector subspace of $mathbb C^9$ is true, then this $A$ is unique and it is of the form $A=begin{pmatrix} a_1 &a_2 &a_3&a_4&a_5&a_6 \ a_5&a_6&a_1&a_2&a_3&a_4 \ a_3&a_4&a_5&a_6&a_1&a_2 end{pmatrix}$.
Let $L$ be the smalles t subsfield of $mathbb C$ generated by the entries of $A$.
I can show that $L subseteq mathbb Q(mu) $ , and hence $L/mathbb Q$ is a Galois-extension.
My question is : What is the extension degree $[L : mathbb Q]$ ?
Since $[mathbb Q(mu):mathbb Q]=phi(9)=6$, so $[L:mathbb Q]=1,2,3, $ or $6$, but exactly which one is it ?
linear-algebra matrices field-theory galois-theory cyclotomic-fields
$endgroup$
Let $mu=e^{2pi i/9}$ . Let $u_j:=(mu^j,mu^{2j}, mu ^{3j},...,mu^{9j})^T in mathbb C^9$, for $j=1,...,9$.
Let $V$ be the vector subspace of $mathbb C^9$ spanned by ${u_2,u_3,u_4,u_5,u_6,u_7}$ .
I can show that there exists $A in M_{3 times 6} (mathbb C)$ such that
$V={(x_1,...,x_9)in mathbb C^9 : (x_3,x_6,x_9)^T = A (x_1,x_2,x_4,x_5,x_7,x_8)^T }$ .
If On a special kind of $6$-dimensional vector subspace of $mathbb C^9$ is true, then this $A$ is unique and it is of the form $A=begin{pmatrix} a_1 &a_2 &a_3&a_4&a_5&a_6 \ a_5&a_6&a_1&a_2&a_3&a_4 \ a_3&a_4&a_5&a_6&a_1&a_2 end{pmatrix}$.
Let $L$ be the smalles t subsfield of $mathbb C$ generated by the entries of $A$.
I can show that $L subseteq mathbb Q(mu) $ , and hence $L/mathbb Q$ is a Galois-extension.
My question is : What is the extension degree $[L : mathbb Q]$ ?
Since $[mathbb Q(mu):mathbb Q]=phi(9)=6$, so $[L:mathbb Q]=1,2,3, $ or $6$, but exactly which one is it ?
linear-algebra matrices field-theory galois-theory cyclotomic-fields
linear-algebra matrices field-theory galois-theory cyclotomic-fields
edited Dec 14 '18 at 3:08
user521337
asked Dec 13 '18 at 8:52
user521337user521337
1,1551417
1,1551417
$begingroup$
Let $V$ be the $mathbb{Q}$ vector space spanned by $u_j, j in [2,7]$. Show it is isomorphic to $mathbb{Q}[mu]$. When looking at $x_n, gcd(n,9) = 1$, you are looking at $v in V mapsto ( sigma_1(v), ldots,sigma_6(v)) in W subset mathbb{Q}[mu]^6, sigma_l in Gal(mathbb{Q}[mu]/mathbb{Q})$ and again $W cong mathbb{Q}[mu]$. Then $A$ is a linear map $mathbb{Q}[mu]^6 to mathbb{Q}[mu^3]^3$ which can be defined over $mathbb{Q}$.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 14 '18 at 3:24
$begingroup$
@reuns: what is $W$ here again ... ? So what is the extension degree ?
$endgroup$
– user521337
Dec 14 '18 at 3:48
$begingroup$
Now that you know $Lsubseteq mathbb{Q}(mu)$ I think it would be better to replace $mathbb{C}$ by $mathbb{Q}(mu)$. (And I have done this before my next comment!)
$endgroup$
– ancientmathematician
Dec 14 '18 at 10:16
$begingroup$
I don't think I agree with @reuns . If $A$ is rational then $V$ will be closed under the operation of applying the Galois Group of $mathbb{Q}(mu)$ to the components of the vectors. Then as $u_2in V$ and $sigma: mumapstomu^2$ is an automorphism, we get that $sigma^{5}(u_2)=u_1$ must be in $V$ as well. But $u_1, u_2,dots, u_9$ are nine LI vectors, so we'd get that $V$ had dimension at least $7$ which it does not.
$endgroup$
– ancientmathematician
Dec 14 '18 at 10:22
$begingroup$
On the other hand $V$ is clearly closed under the automorphism $mumapstomu^{-1}$ ...
$endgroup$
– ancientmathematician
Dec 14 '18 at 10:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $V$ be the $mathbb{Q}$ vector space spanned by $u_j, j in [2,7]$. Show it is isomorphic to $mathbb{Q}[mu]$. When looking at $x_n, gcd(n,9) = 1$, you are looking at $v in V mapsto ( sigma_1(v), ldots,sigma_6(v)) in W subset mathbb{Q}[mu]^6, sigma_l in Gal(mathbb{Q}[mu]/mathbb{Q})$ and again $W cong mathbb{Q}[mu]$. Then $A$ is a linear map $mathbb{Q}[mu]^6 to mathbb{Q}[mu^3]^3$ which can be defined over $mathbb{Q}$.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 14 '18 at 3:24
$begingroup$
@reuns: what is $W$ here again ... ? So what is the extension degree ?
$endgroup$
– user521337
Dec 14 '18 at 3:48
$begingroup$
Now that you know $Lsubseteq mathbb{Q}(mu)$ I think it would be better to replace $mathbb{C}$ by $mathbb{Q}(mu)$. (And I have done this before my next comment!)
$endgroup$
– ancientmathematician
Dec 14 '18 at 10:16
$begingroup$
I don't think I agree with @reuns . If $A$ is rational then $V$ will be closed under the operation of applying the Galois Group of $mathbb{Q}(mu)$ to the components of the vectors. Then as $u_2in V$ and $sigma: mumapstomu^2$ is an automorphism, we get that $sigma^{5}(u_2)=u_1$ must be in $V$ as well. But $u_1, u_2,dots, u_9$ are nine LI vectors, so we'd get that $V$ had dimension at least $7$ which it does not.
$endgroup$
– ancientmathematician
Dec 14 '18 at 10:22
$begingroup$
On the other hand $V$ is clearly closed under the automorphism $mumapstomu^{-1}$ ...
$endgroup$
– ancientmathematician
Dec 14 '18 at 10:24
$begingroup$
Let $V$ be the $mathbb{Q}$ vector space spanned by $u_j, j in [2,7]$. Show it is isomorphic to $mathbb{Q}[mu]$. When looking at $x_n, gcd(n,9) = 1$, you are looking at $v in V mapsto ( sigma_1(v), ldots,sigma_6(v)) in W subset mathbb{Q}[mu]^6, sigma_l in Gal(mathbb{Q}[mu]/mathbb{Q})$ and again $W cong mathbb{Q}[mu]$. Then $A$ is a linear map $mathbb{Q}[mu]^6 to mathbb{Q}[mu^3]^3$ which can be defined over $mathbb{Q}$.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 14 '18 at 3:24
$begingroup$
Let $V$ be the $mathbb{Q}$ vector space spanned by $u_j, j in [2,7]$. Show it is isomorphic to $mathbb{Q}[mu]$. When looking at $x_n, gcd(n,9) = 1$, you are looking at $v in V mapsto ( sigma_1(v), ldots,sigma_6(v)) in W subset mathbb{Q}[mu]^6, sigma_l in Gal(mathbb{Q}[mu]/mathbb{Q})$ and again $W cong mathbb{Q}[mu]$. Then $A$ is a linear map $mathbb{Q}[mu]^6 to mathbb{Q}[mu^3]^3$ which can be defined over $mathbb{Q}$.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 14 '18 at 3:24
$begingroup$
@reuns: what is $W$ here again ... ? So what is the extension degree ?
$endgroup$
– user521337
Dec 14 '18 at 3:48
$begingroup$
@reuns: what is $W$ here again ... ? So what is the extension degree ?
$endgroup$
– user521337
Dec 14 '18 at 3:48
$begingroup$
Now that you know $Lsubseteq mathbb{Q}(mu)$ I think it would be better to replace $mathbb{C}$ by $mathbb{Q}(mu)$. (And I have done this before my next comment!)
$endgroup$
– ancientmathematician
Dec 14 '18 at 10:16
$begingroup$
Now that you know $Lsubseteq mathbb{Q}(mu)$ I think it would be better to replace $mathbb{C}$ by $mathbb{Q}(mu)$. (And I have done this before my next comment!)
$endgroup$
– ancientmathematician
Dec 14 '18 at 10:16
$begingroup$
I don't think I agree with @reuns . If $A$ is rational then $V$ will be closed under the operation of applying the Galois Group of $mathbb{Q}(mu)$ to the components of the vectors. Then as $u_2in V$ and $sigma: mumapstomu^2$ is an automorphism, we get that $sigma^{5}(u_2)=u_1$ must be in $V$ as well. But $u_1, u_2,dots, u_9$ are nine LI vectors, so we'd get that $V$ had dimension at least $7$ which it does not.
$endgroup$
– ancientmathematician
Dec 14 '18 at 10:22
$begingroup$
I don't think I agree with @reuns . If $A$ is rational then $V$ will be closed under the operation of applying the Galois Group of $mathbb{Q}(mu)$ to the components of the vectors. Then as $u_2in V$ and $sigma: mumapstomu^2$ is an automorphism, we get that $sigma^{5}(u_2)=u_1$ must be in $V$ as well. But $u_1, u_2,dots, u_9$ are nine LI vectors, so we'd get that $V$ had dimension at least $7$ which it does not.
$endgroup$
– ancientmathematician
Dec 14 '18 at 10:22
$begingroup$
On the other hand $V$ is clearly closed under the automorphism $mumapstomu^{-1}$ ...
$endgroup$
– ancientmathematician
Dec 14 '18 at 10:24
$begingroup$
On the other hand $V$ is clearly closed under the automorphism $mumapstomu^{-1}$ ...
$endgroup$
– ancientmathematician
Dec 14 '18 at 10:24
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let's re-write slightly using the facts you have established.
Let $K=mathbb{Q}[mu]$ where $mu$ is a primitive $9$-th root of unity. For $j=0,dots, 8$ let $u_j$ be the column vector whose $i$-th component (for $i=0,dots, 8$) is $mu^{ji}$.
Let $M$ be the matrix whose columns are $u_0,dots, u_8$. Note that we have the orthogonality conditions $bar{M}^{T}M=9I$. Amongst other things this shows that the nine columns are linearly independent.
It is convenient to re-order the rows and columns in this order: $0,3,6,1,2,4,8,7,5$.
Let $V$ be the $K$-span of $u_2,u_3,u_4,u_4,u_6,u_7$.
We are given that $V$ is the null space of some $B:=[I_3 A]$, and that the $A$ in question is unique. Again, for convenience we've replaced $A$ of the question by its negative. Let us then find $A$ explicitly.
As the columns $u_2,u_3,u_4,u_4,u_6,u_7$ are in the null space of $B$ the rows of $B$ are orthogonal to these six vectors. However, by the orthogonality relations we have that the three rows $bar{u_{0}}^T,bar{u_{1}}^T,bar{u_{8}}^T$ are orthogonal to the six vectors. These three rows form the matrix
$$
B_1:=begin{bmatrix}
1 & 1 & 1 &1 & 1 & 1 &1 & 1 & 1\
1 & omega^2 & omega &mu^{-1} & mu^{-2} & mu^{-4}&mu & mu^2 & mu^4\
1 & omega & omega^2 &mu & mu^2 & mu^4 &mu^{-1} & mu^{-2} & mu^{-4}\
end{bmatrix}=[Omega Delta bar{Delta}], text{ say,}
$$
where $omega:=mu^3$.
Now $bar{Omega}^{T}B_1$ also annihilates the six vectors $u_2,u_3,u_4,u_4,u_6,u_7$, and as $Omega$ also satisfies the orthogonality conditions we have
$$
bar{Omega}^{T}B_1=[ 3I (bar{Omega}^{T}Delta) (bar{Omega}^{T}bar{Delta})].
$$
By the uniqueness of $A$, then, we have
$$
A=frac{1}{3}[(bar{Omega}^{T}Delta) (bar{Omega}^{T}bar{Delta})].
$$
It is now routine to calculate the entries of $A$. They all lie in the degree $3$ extension $mathbb{Q} [mu+mu^{-1}, mu^2+mu^{-2},mu^4+mu^{-4}]$ and they are not all rational.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037774%2fon-a-special-kind-of-six-dimensional-vector-subspace-of-mathbb-c9-related-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let's re-write slightly using the facts you have established.
Let $K=mathbb{Q}[mu]$ where $mu$ is a primitive $9$-th root of unity. For $j=0,dots, 8$ let $u_j$ be the column vector whose $i$-th component (for $i=0,dots, 8$) is $mu^{ji}$.
Let $M$ be the matrix whose columns are $u_0,dots, u_8$. Note that we have the orthogonality conditions $bar{M}^{T}M=9I$. Amongst other things this shows that the nine columns are linearly independent.
It is convenient to re-order the rows and columns in this order: $0,3,6,1,2,4,8,7,5$.
Let $V$ be the $K$-span of $u_2,u_3,u_4,u_4,u_6,u_7$.
We are given that $V$ is the null space of some $B:=[I_3 A]$, and that the $A$ in question is unique. Again, for convenience we've replaced $A$ of the question by its negative. Let us then find $A$ explicitly.
As the columns $u_2,u_3,u_4,u_4,u_6,u_7$ are in the null space of $B$ the rows of $B$ are orthogonal to these six vectors. However, by the orthogonality relations we have that the three rows $bar{u_{0}}^T,bar{u_{1}}^T,bar{u_{8}}^T$ are orthogonal to the six vectors. These three rows form the matrix
$$
B_1:=begin{bmatrix}
1 & 1 & 1 &1 & 1 & 1 &1 & 1 & 1\
1 & omega^2 & omega &mu^{-1} & mu^{-2} & mu^{-4}&mu & mu^2 & mu^4\
1 & omega & omega^2 &mu & mu^2 & mu^4 &mu^{-1} & mu^{-2} & mu^{-4}\
end{bmatrix}=[Omega Delta bar{Delta}], text{ say,}
$$
where $omega:=mu^3$.
Now $bar{Omega}^{T}B_1$ also annihilates the six vectors $u_2,u_3,u_4,u_4,u_6,u_7$, and as $Omega$ also satisfies the orthogonality conditions we have
$$
bar{Omega}^{T}B_1=[ 3I (bar{Omega}^{T}Delta) (bar{Omega}^{T}bar{Delta})].
$$
By the uniqueness of $A$, then, we have
$$
A=frac{1}{3}[(bar{Omega}^{T}Delta) (bar{Omega}^{T}bar{Delta})].
$$
It is now routine to calculate the entries of $A$. They all lie in the degree $3$ extension $mathbb{Q} [mu+mu^{-1}, mu^2+mu^{-2},mu^4+mu^{-4}]$ and they are not all rational.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's re-write slightly using the facts you have established.
Let $K=mathbb{Q}[mu]$ where $mu$ is a primitive $9$-th root of unity. For $j=0,dots, 8$ let $u_j$ be the column vector whose $i$-th component (for $i=0,dots, 8$) is $mu^{ji}$.
Let $M$ be the matrix whose columns are $u_0,dots, u_8$. Note that we have the orthogonality conditions $bar{M}^{T}M=9I$. Amongst other things this shows that the nine columns are linearly independent.
It is convenient to re-order the rows and columns in this order: $0,3,6,1,2,4,8,7,5$.
Let $V$ be the $K$-span of $u_2,u_3,u_4,u_4,u_6,u_7$.
We are given that $V$ is the null space of some $B:=[I_3 A]$, and that the $A$ in question is unique. Again, for convenience we've replaced $A$ of the question by its negative. Let us then find $A$ explicitly.
As the columns $u_2,u_3,u_4,u_4,u_6,u_7$ are in the null space of $B$ the rows of $B$ are orthogonal to these six vectors. However, by the orthogonality relations we have that the three rows $bar{u_{0}}^T,bar{u_{1}}^T,bar{u_{8}}^T$ are orthogonal to the six vectors. These three rows form the matrix
$$
B_1:=begin{bmatrix}
1 & 1 & 1 &1 & 1 & 1 &1 & 1 & 1\
1 & omega^2 & omega &mu^{-1} & mu^{-2} & mu^{-4}&mu & mu^2 & mu^4\
1 & omega & omega^2 &mu & mu^2 & mu^4 &mu^{-1} & mu^{-2} & mu^{-4}\
end{bmatrix}=[Omega Delta bar{Delta}], text{ say,}
$$
where $omega:=mu^3$.
Now $bar{Omega}^{T}B_1$ also annihilates the six vectors $u_2,u_3,u_4,u_4,u_6,u_7$, and as $Omega$ also satisfies the orthogonality conditions we have
$$
bar{Omega}^{T}B_1=[ 3I (bar{Omega}^{T}Delta) (bar{Omega}^{T}bar{Delta})].
$$
By the uniqueness of $A$, then, we have
$$
A=frac{1}{3}[(bar{Omega}^{T}Delta) (bar{Omega}^{T}bar{Delta})].
$$
It is now routine to calculate the entries of $A$. They all lie in the degree $3$ extension $mathbb{Q} [mu+mu^{-1}, mu^2+mu^{-2},mu^4+mu^{-4}]$ and they are not all rational.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's re-write slightly using the facts you have established.
Let $K=mathbb{Q}[mu]$ where $mu$ is a primitive $9$-th root of unity. For $j=0,dots, 8$ let $u_j$ be the column vector whose $i$-th component (for $i=0,dots, 8$) is $mu^{ji}$.
Let $M$ be the matrix whose columns are $u_0,dots, u_8$. Note that we have the orthogonality conditions $bar{M}^{T}M=9I$. Amongst other things this shows that the nine columns are linearly independent.
It is convenient to re-order the rows and columns in this order: $0,3,6,1,2,4,8,7,5$.
Let $V$ be the $K$-span of $u_2,u_3,u_4,u_4,u_6,u_7$.
We are given that $V$ is the null space of some $B:=[I_3 A]$, and that the $A$ in question is unique. Again, for convenience we've replaced $A$ of the question by its negative. Let us then find $A$ explicitly.
As the columns $u_2,u_3,u_4,u_4,u_6,u_7$ are in the null space of $B$ the rows of $B$ are orthogonal to these six vectors. However, by the orthogonality relations we have that the three rows $bar{u_{0}}^T,bar{u_{1}}^T,bar{u_{8}}^T$ are orthogonal to the six vectors. These three rows form the matrix
$$
B_1:=begin{bmatrix}
1 & 1 & 1 &1 & 1 & 1 &1 & 1 & 1\
1 & omega^2 & omega &mu^{-1} & mu^{-2} & mu^{-4}&mu & mu^2 & mu^4\
1 & omega & omega^2 &mu & mu^2 & mu^4 &mu^{-1} & mu^{-2} & mu^{-4}\
end{bmatrix}=[Omega Delta bar{Delta}], text{ say,}
$$
where $omega:=mu^3$.
Now $bar{Omega}^{T}B_1$ also annihilates the six vectors $u_2,u_3,u_4,u_4,u_6,u_7$, and as $Omega$ also satisfies the orthogonality conditions we have
$$
bar{Omega}^{T}B_1=[ 3I (bar{Omega}^{T}Delta) (bar{Omega}^{T}bar{Delta})].
$$
By the uniqueness of $A$, then, we have
$$
A=frac{1}{3}[(bar{Omega}^{T}Delta) (bar{Omega}^{T}bar{Delta})].
$$
It is now routine to calculate the entries of $A$. They all lie in the degree $3$ extension $mathbb{Q} [mu+mu^{-1}, mu^2+mu^{-2},mu^4+mu^{-4}]$ and they are not all rational.
$endgroup$
Let's re-write slightly using the facts you have established.
Let $K=mathbb{Q}[mu]$ where $mu$ is a primitive $9$-th root of unity. For $j=0,dots, 8$ let $u_j$ be the column vector whose $i$-th component (for $i=0,dots, 8$) is $mu^{ji}$.
Let $M$ be the matrix whose columns are $u_0,dots, u_8$. Note that we have the orthogonality conditions $bar{M}^{T}M=9I$. Amongst other things this shows that the nine columns are linearly independent.
It is convenient to re-order the rows and columns in this order: $0,3,6,1,2,4,8,7,5$.
Let $V$ be the $K$-span of $u_2,u_3,u_4,u_4,u_6,u_7$.
We are given that $V$ is the null space of some $B:=[I_3 A]$, and that the $A$ in question is unique. Again, for convenience we've replaced $A$ of the question by its negative. Let us then find $A$ explicitly.
As the columns $u_2,u_3,u_4,u_4,u_6,u_7$ are in the null space of $B$ the rows of $B$ are orthogonal to these six vectors. However, by the orthogonality relations we have that the three rows $bar{u_{0}}^T,bar{u_{1}}^T,bar{u_{8}}^T$ are orthogonal to the six vectors. These three rows form the matrix
$$
B_1:=begin{bmatrix}
1 & 1 & 1 &1 & 1 & 1 &1 & 1 & 1\
1 & omega^2 & omega &mu^{-1} & mu^{-2} & mu^{-4}&mu & mu^2 & mu^4\
1 & omega & omega^2 &mu & mu^2 & mu^4 &mu^{-1} & mu^{-2} & mu^{-4}\
end{bmatrix}=[Omega Delta bar{Delta}], text{ say,}
$$
where $omega:=mu^3$.
Now $bar{Omega}^{T}B_1$ also annihilates the six vectors $u_2,u_3,u_4,u_4,u_6,u_7$, and as $Omega$ also satisfies the orthogonality conditions we have
$$
bar{Omega}^{T}B_1=[ 3I (bar{Omega}^{T}Delta) (bar{Omega}^{T}bar{Delta})].
$$
By the uniqueness of $A$, then, we have
$$
A=frac{1}{3}[(bar{Omega}^{T}Delta) (bar{Omega}^{T}bar{Delta})].
$$
It is now routine to calculate the entries of $A$. They all lie in the degree $3$ extension $mathbb{Q} [mu+mu^{-1}, mu^2+mu^{-2},mu^4+mu^{-4}]$ and they are not all rational.
answered Dec 14 '18 at 14:26
ancientmathematicianancientmathematician
4,4481513
4,4481513
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037774%2fon-a-special-kind-of-six-dimensional-vector-subspace-of-mathbb-c9-related-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Let $V$ be the $mathbb{Q}$ vector space spanned by $u_j, j in [2,7]$. Show it is isomorphic to $mathbb{Q}[mu]$. When looking at $x_n, gcd(n,9) = 1$, you are looking at $v in V mapsto ( sigma_1(v), ldots,sigma_6(v)) in W subset mathbb{Q}[mu]^6, sigma_l in Gal(mathbb{Q}[mu]/mathbb{Q})$ and again $W cong mathbb{Q}[mu]$. Then $A$ is a linear map $mathbb{Q}[mu]^6 to mathbb{Q}[mu^3]^3$ which can be defined over $mathbb{Q}$.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 14 '18 at 3:24
$begingroup$
@reuns: what is $W$ here again ... ? So what is the extension degree ?
$endgroup$
– user521337
Dec 14 '18 at 3:48
$begingroup$
Now that you know $Lsubseteq mathbb{Q}(mu)$ I think it would be better to replace $mathbb{C}$ by $mathbb{Q}(mu)$. (And I have done this before my next comment!)
$endgroup$
– ancientmathematician
Dec 14 '18 at 10:16
$begingroup$
I don't think I agree with @reuns . If $A$ is rational then $V$ will be closed under the operation of applying the Galois Group of $mathbb{Q}(mu)$ to the components of the vectors. Then as $u_2in V$ and $sigma: mumapstomu^2$ is an automorphism, we get that $sigma^{5}(u_2)=u_1$ must be in $V$ as well. But $u_1, u_2,dots, u_9$ are nine LI vectors, so we'd get that $V$ had dimension at least $7$ which it does not.
$endgroup$
– ancientmathematician
Dec 14 '18 at 10:22
$begingroup$
On the other hand $V$ is clearly closed under the automorphism $mumapstomu^{-1}$ ...
$endgroup$
– ancientmathematician
Dec 14 '18 at 10:24