For what $n$ is $W_n$ finite?
$begingroup$
Suppose, $W_n$ is the set of all words formed by letters '$a$' and '$b$', that do not contain $n$ same consecutive nonempty subwords (that means that for any nonempty word $u$, the word $u^n$ is not a subword of words from $W_n$) For example "$bababab$" is not in $W_3$, as it contains three consecutive "$ba$" subwords, but it obviously is in $W_4$.
For what $n$ is $W_n$ finite?
It is easy to see, that $W_n subset W_{n+1}$ and thus the sequence of cardinals ${|W_n|}_{n=1}^{infty}$ is monotonously non-decreasing.
Thus either $W_n$ is finite for all $n$, or it is infinite for all $n$, or there exists $n_0$, such that $W_n$ is finite for all $n < n_0$ and infinite for all $n geq n_0$.
One can also see, that $W_2 = {a, b, ab, ba, aba, bab}$ is finite. One can prove that just by looking at all 16 words of length 4 and seeing that none of them lies in $W_2$.
However, $W_{665}$ is already infinite. Suppose $G$ is an infinite $2$-generated group of exponent $665$ (such group exists according to Adyan-Novikov theorem). Then any element of it can be expressed as a multiple product of those two generators (which can be written as a word formed by letters '$a$' and '$b$' (that denote the first and the second generator respectively). Due to the group having exponent $665$, any such word can be "reduced" to a word from $W_{665}$. One can see that two elements that can be written as the same word are equal. And in $G$ there is infinitely many pairwise not equal elements. Thus $W_{665}$ is infinite by pigeonhole principle.
So we can say that there exists such $n_0$, that $W_n$ is finite for all $n < n_0$ and infinite for all $n geq n_0$. And that aforementioned $n_0$ satisfies the inequality $2 < n_0 leq 665$. However I failed to determine anything else about that number.
Any help will be appreciated.
combinatorics group-theory dynamical-systems formal-languages combinatorics-on-words
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose, $W_n$ is the set of all words formed by letters '$a$' and '$b$', that do not contain $n$ same consecutive nonempty subwords (that means that for any nonempty word $u$, the word $u^n$ is not a subword of words from $W_n$) For example "$bababab$" is not in $W_3$, as it contains three consecutive "$ba$" subwords, but it obviously is in $W_4$.
For what $n$ is $W_n$ finite?
It is easy to see, that $W_n subset W_{n+1}$ and thus the sequence of cardinals ${|W_n|}_{n=1}^{infty}$ is monotonously non-decreasing.
Thus either $W_n$ is finite for all $n$, or it is infinite for all $n$, or there exists $n_0$, such that $W_n$ is finite for all $n < n_0$ and infinite for all $n geq n_0$.
One can also see, that $W_2 = {a, b, ab, ba, aba, bab}$ is finite. One can prove that just by looking at all 16 words of length 4 and seeing that none of them lies in $W_2$.
However, $W_{665}$ is already infinite. Suppose $G$ is an infinite $2$-generated group of exponent $665$ (such group exists according to Adyan-Novikov theorem). Then any element of it can be expressed as a multiple product of those two generators (which can be written as a word formed by letters '$a$' and '$b$' (that denote the first and the second generator respectively). Due to the group having exponent $665$, any such word can be "reduced" to a word from $W_{665}$. One can see that two elements that can be written as the same word are equal. And in $G$ there is infinitely many pairwise not equal elements. Thus $W_{665}$ is infinite by pigeonhole principle.
So we can say that there exists such $n_0$, that $W_n$ is finite for all $n < n_0$ and infinite for all $n geq n_0$. And that aforementioned $n_0$ satisfies the inequality $2 < n_0 leq 665$. However I failed to determine anything else about that number.
Any help will be appreciated.
combinatorics group-theory dynamical-systems formal-languages combinatorics-on-words
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The main subject of the question is symbolic dynamics.
$endgroup$
– YCor
Dec 13 '18 at 22:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose, $W_n$ is the set of all words formed by letters '$a$' and '$b$', that do not contain $n$ same consecutive nonempty subwords (that means that for any nonempty word $u$, the word $u^n$ is not a subword of words from $W_n$) For example "$bababab$" is not in $W_3$, as it contains three consecutive "$ba$" subwords, but it obviously is in $W_4$.
For what $n$ is $W_n$ finite?
It is easy to see, that $W_n subset W_{n+1}$ and thus the sequence of cardinals ${|W_n|}_{n=1}^{infty}$ is monotonously non-decreasing.
Thus either $W_n$ is finite for all $n$, or it is infinite for all $n$, or there exists $n_0$, such that $W_n$ is finite for all $n < n_0$ and infinite for all $n geq n_0$.
One can also see, that $W_2 = {a, b, ab, ba, aba, bab}$ is finite. One can prove that just by looking at all 16 words of length 4 and seeing that none of them lies in $W_2$.
However, $W_{665}$ is already infinite. Suppose $G$ is an infinite $2$-generated group of exponent $665$ (such group exists according to Adyan-Novikov theorem). Then any element of it can be expressed as a multiple product of those two generators (which can be written as a word formed by letters '$a$' and '$b$' (that denote the first and the second generator respectively). Due to the group having exponent $665$, any such word can be "reduced" to a word from $W_{665}$. One can see that two elements that can be written as the same word are equal. And in $G$ there is infinitely many pairwise not equal elements. Thus $W_{665}$ is infinite by pigeonhole principle.
So we can say that there exists such $n_0$, that $W_n$ is finite for all $n < n_0$ and infinite for all $n geq n_0$. And that aforementioned $n_0$ satisfies the inequality $2 < n_0 leq 665$. However I failed to determine anything else about that number.
Any help will be appreciated.
combinatorics group-theory dynamical-systems formal-languages combinatorics-on-words
$endgroup$
Suppose, $W_n$ is the set of all words formed by letters '$a$' and '$b$', that do not contain $n$ same consecutive nonempty subwords (that means that for any nonempty word $u$, the word $u^n$ is not a subword of words from $W_n$) For example "$bababab$" is not in $W_3$, as it contains three consecutive "$ba$" subwords, but it obviously is in $W_4$.
For what $n$ is $W_n$ finite?
It is easy to see, that $W_n subset W_{n+1}$ and thus the sequence of cardinals ${|W_n|}_{n=1}^{infty}$ is monotonously non-decreasing.
Thus either $W_n$ is finite for all $n$, or it is infinite for all $n$, or there exists $n_0$, such that $W_n$ is finite for all $n < n_0$ and infinite for all $n geq n_0$.
One can also see, that $W_2 = {a, b, ab, ba, aba, bab}$ is finite. One can prove that just by looking at all 16 words of length 4 and seeing that none of them lies in $W_2$.
However, $W_{665}$ is already infinite. Suppose $G$ is an infinite $2$-generated group of exponent $665$ (such group exists according to Adyan-Novikov theorem). Then any element of it can be expressed as a multiple product of those two generators (which can be written as a word formed by letters '$a$' and '$b$' (that denote the first and the second generator respectively). Due to the group having exponent $665$, any such word can be "reduced" to a word from $W_{665}$. One can see that two elements that can be written as the same word are equal. And in $G$ there is infinitely many pairwise not equal elements. Thus $W_{665}$ is infinite by pigeonhole principle.
So we can say that there exists such $n_0$, that $W_n$ is finite for all $n < n_0$ and infinite for all $n geq n_0$. And that aforementioned $n_0$ satisfies the inequality $2 < n_0 leq 665$. However I failed to determine anything else about that number.
Any help will be appreciated.
combinatorics group-theory dynamical-systems formal-languages combinatorics-on-words
combinatorics group-theory dynamical-systems formal-languages combinatorics-on-words
edited Dec 13 '18 at 22:58
YCor
7,788929
7,788929
asked Dec 13 '18 at 8:39
Yanior WegYanior Weg
2,34711144
2,34711144
$begingroup$
The main subject of the question is symbolic dynamics.
$endgroup$
– YCor
Dec 13 '18 at 22:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The main subject of the question is symbolic dynamics.
$endgroup$
– YCor
Dec 13 '18 at 22:59
$begingroup$
The main subject of the question is symbolic dynamics.
$endgroup$
– YCor
Dec 13 '18 at 22:59
$begingroup$
The main subject of the question is symbolic dynamics.
$endgroup$
– YCor
Dec 13 '18 at 22:59
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$W_n$ is infinite for all $n geq 3$.
There is an infinite binary word called the Thue–Morse sequence which is cube-free (among other properties). It can be constructed recursively as follows:
- $w_1 = a$
$w_{n+1} = w_n overline{w_n}$ where for word $w in { a,b }^*$ by $overline{w}$ we denote the "Boolean complement" of $w$ (e.g., $overline{a} = b$, $overline{ab} = ba$, $overline{aabaa} = bbabb$).
The Thue–Morse sequence is the natural limit of these finite words.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037764%2ffor-what-n-is-w-n-finite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$W_n$ is infinite for all $n geq 3$.
There is an infinite binary word called the Thue–Morse sequence which is cube-free (among other properties). It can be constructed recursively as follows:
- $w_1 = a$
$w_{n+1} = w_n overline{w_n}$ where for word $w in { a,b }^*$ by $overline{w}$ we denote the "Boolean complement" of $w$ (e.g., $overline{a} = b$, $overline{ab} = ba$, $overline{aabaa} = bbabb$).
The Thue–Morse sequence is the natural limit of these finite words.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$W_n$ is infinite for all $n geq 3$.
There is an infinite binary word called the Thue–Morse sequence which is cube-free (among other properties). It can be constructed recursively as follows:
- $w_1 = a$
$w_{n+1} = w_n overline{w_n}$ where for word $w in { a,b }^*$ by $overline{w}$ we denote the "Boolean complement" of $w$ (e.g., $overline{a} = b$, $overline{ab} = ba$, $overline{aabaa} = bbabb$).
The Thue–Morse sequence is the natural limit of these finite words.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$W_n$ is infinite for all $n geq 3$.
There is an infinite binary word called the Thue–Morse sequence which is cube-free (among other properties). It can be constructed recursively as follows:
- $w_1 = a$
$w_{n+1} = w_n overline{w_n}$ where for word $w in { a,b }^*$ by $overline{w}$ we denote the "Boolean complement" of $w$ (e.g., $overline{a} = b$, $overline{ab} = ba$, $overline{aabaa} = bbabb$).
The Thue–Morse sequence is the natural limit of these finite words.
$endgroup$
$W_n$ is infinite for all $n geq 3$.
There is an infinite binary word called the Thue–Morse sequence which is cube-free (among other properties). It can be constructed recursively as follows:
- $w_1 = a$
$w_{n+1} = w_n overline{w_n}$ where for word $w in { a,b }^*$ by $overline{w}$ we denote the "Boolean complement" of $w$ (e.g., $overline{a} = b$, $overline{ab} = ba$, $overline{aabaa} = bbabb$).
The Thue–Morse sequence is the natural limit of these finite words.
answered Dec 13 '18 at 9:09
Meta-мета-μετα-meta-мета-μεταMeta-мета-μετα-meta-мета-μετα
4,705927
4,705927
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037764%2ffor-what-n-is-w-n-finite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
The main subject of the question is symbolic dynamics.
$endgroup$
– YCor
Dec 13 '18 at 22:59