Inhomogenous nonlinear transport equation $u_t+uu_x = -Du$
$begingroup$
We have the following setup: $$u_t+uu_x = -Du \ u(x,0)=sin x.$$ The question is to find the time $T_s$ of a first shock formation. So basically, I need to solve the equation using method of characteristics and go from there.
But when I solve the corresponding quasilinear equation,I am getting the implicit solution $$u(x,t) = dfrac{sin(x-tu)}{1+Dt}$$ which does not seem right.
Can anybody provide a solution using the method of characterisics so I can pinpoint where my mistake is?
pde characteristics transport-equation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have the following setup: $$u_t+uu_x = -Du \ u(x,0)=sin x.$$ The question is to find the time $T_s$ of a first shock formation. So basically, I need to solve the equation using method of characteristics and go from there.
But when I solve the corresponding quasilinear equation,I am getting the implicit solution $$u(x,t) = dfrac{sin(x-tu)}{1+Dt}$$ which does not seem right.
Can anybody provide a solution using the method of characterisics so I can pinpoint where my mistake is?
pde characteristics transport-equation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have the following setup: $$u_t+uu_x = -Du \ u(x,0)=sin x.$$ The question is to find the time $T_s$ of a first shock formation. So basically, I need to solve the equation using method of characteristics and go from there.
But when I solve the corresponding quasilinear equation,I am getting the implicit solution $$u(x,t) = dfrac{sin(x-tu)}{1+Dt}$$ which does not seem right.
Can anybody provide a solution using the method of characterisics so I can pinpoint where my mistake is?
pde characteristics transport-equation
$endgroup$
We have the following setup: $$u_t+uu_x = -Du \ u(x,0)=sin x.$$ The question is to find the time $T_s$ of a first shock formation. So basically, I need to solve the equation using method of characteristics and go from there.
But when I solve the corresponding quasilinear equation,I am getting the implicit solution $$u(x,t) = dfrac{sin(x-tu)}{1+Dt}$$ which does not seem right.
Can anybody provide a solution using the method of characterisics so I can pinpoint where my mistake is?
pde characteristics transport-equation
pde characteristics transport-equation
edited Dec 6 '18 at 11:53
Harry49
6,18331132
6,18331132
asked Aug 23 '17 at 21:18
dezdichadodezdichado
6,3711929
6,3711929
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
First, it should be clearly stated what $D$ is here. Many times it represents a differential operator, but here I assume it is meant to be an arbitrary constant. I'll rewrite the equation with $q = u_x, p = u_t, z = u,$ so that $F(p,q,z) = 0,$
$$p - zq + Dz = 0.$$
Next, apply the method of characteristics, where only the $z, x$ characteristics are needed since its not fully nonlinear.
begin{align}
frac{dz}{dt} &= q partial_q F + p partial_p F = p -zq = -Dz; ;; z(x_0,0) = sin(x_0)\
frac{dx}{dt} &= partial_q F = -z; ;; x(t = 0) = x_0.
end{align}
Solving these gives us our solution,
begin{align}
z(x_0,t) &= sin(x_0)e^{-Dt}\
x &= frac{sin{(x_0)}(e^{-Dt} - 1) + Dx_0}{D}
end{align}
Now if we could solve the latter equation for $x_0 = x_0(x,t),$ we could plug this back into the equation for $z(x_0,t)$ to get $u(x,t)$ explicitly.
If I wanted to show a finite time blow up, I'd formally take the $x$ derivative of $z(x_0,t),$
begin{align}
frac{dz}{dx} &= cos{(x_0)}e^{-Dt}frac{dx_0}{dx} = cos{(x_0)}e^{-Dt} frac{1}{frac{dx}{dx_0}}\
&= frac{Dcos{(x_0)}e^{-Dt}}{cos{(x_0)}(e^{-Dt} - 1) + D}\
&= frac{De^{-Dt}}{e^{-Dt} + frac{D}{cos{(x_0)}}-1}\
end{align}
Perhaps I have errored, but this gradient only blows up if $e^{-Dt} = frac{D}{cos{x_0}} - 1,$ at some $t.$ Therefore, we need $D leq 2$ for this to happen at all.
I am a little surprised about this, that the RHS forcing term changes this answer from the normal result, i.e. blow up when $t = frac{-1}{cos{(x_0)}}.$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks, it looks promising and I will look into it in detail.
$endgroup$
– dezdichado
Aug 24 '17 at 19:16
$begingroup$
@dezdichado There is a sign mistake in the expression of the characteristic curves $x=dots$ here (see my answer). This explains the inconsistency pointed out by the answerer.
$endgroup$
– Harry49
Aug 31 '18 at 11:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This (dissipative) Burgers' equation with relaxation is a typical example of conditional shock formation. The method of characteristics gives
$frac{text d t}{text d s} = 1$. Letting $t(0) = 0$, we have $t=s$.
$frac{text d u}{text d s} = -Du$. Letting $u(0) = sin x_0$, we have $u = sin (x_0), e^{-Ds}$.
$frac{text d x}{text d s} = u$. Letting $x(0) = x_0$, we have $x = -frac{1}{D} sin(x_0)(e^{-Ds}-1) + x_0$.
This is sometimes written in implicit form as $$u = sinleft(x - frac{e^{Dt}-1}{D} uright) e^{-Dt}, .$$
Now, let us compute the breaking time. Differentiating $x$ w.r.t. $x_0$ , we have $frac{text d x}{text d x_0} = -frac{1}{D} cos(x_0)(e^{-Dt}-1) + 1$. This quantity vanishes at $t = frac{1}{D}lnleft(frac{cos x_0}{D + cos x_0}right)$, where characteristics intersect. The smallest such positive time corresponds to the breaking time $T_s$, i.e.
$$
T_s = frac{1}{D}lnleft(frac{1}{1-D}right) ,quad text{if}quad D < 1 , .
$$
Otherwise, if $Dgeqslant 1$, no shock occurs.
Alternatively, one can follow the method leading to Eq. (6.10) p. 36 of (1). Differentiating the PDE with respect to $x$ gives
$$
u_{tx} + (u_x)^2 + u u_{xx} = -Du_x , .
$$
Now, we introduce $q = u_x$ and the directional derivative $q' = q_t + u q_x$, so that the previous equation rewrites as
$q' + q^2 = -D q$.
This Bernoulli differential equation has the solution
$$
q(t) = frac{D q_0}{(D + q_0) e^{Dt}- q_0} , ,
$$
where $q_0 = q(0) = cos x_0$. Therefore, $q$ blows up at $t = frac{1}{D}lnleft(frac{cos x_0}{D + cos x_0}right)$, and the same expression of $T_s$ is obtained.
(1) P.D. Lax, Hyperbolic systems of conservation laws and the mathematical theory of shock waves. SIAM, 1973. doi:10.1137/1.9781611970562.ch1
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2403982%2finhomogenous-nonlinear-transport-equation-u-tuu-x-du%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
First, it should be clearly stated what $D$ is here. Many times it represents a differential operator, but here I assume it is meant to be an arbitrary constant. I'll rewrite the equation with $q = u_x, p = u_t, z = u,$ so that $F(p,q,z) = 0,$
$$p - zq + Dz = 0.$$
Next, apply the method of characteristics, where only the $z, x$ characteristics are needed since its not fully nonlinear.
begin{align}
frac{dz}{dt} &= q partial_q F + p partial_p F = p -zq = -Dz; ;; z(x_0,0) = sin(x_0)\
frac{dx}{dt} &= partial_q F = -z; ;; x(t = 0) = x_0.
end{align}
Solving these gives us our solution,
begin{align}
z(x_0,t) &= sin(x_0)e^{-Dt}\
x &= frac{sin{(x_0)}(e^{-Dt} - 1) + Dx_0}{D}
end{align}
Now if we could solve the latter equation for $x_0 = x_0(x,t),$ we could plug this back into the equation for $z(x_0,t)$ to get $u(x,t)$ explicitly.
If I wanted to show a finite time blow up, I'd formally take the $x$ derivative of $z(x_0,t),$
begin{align}
frac{dz}{dx} &= cos{(x_0)}e^{-Dt}frac{dx_0}{dx} = cos{(x_0)}e^{-Dt} frac{1}{frac{dx}{dx_0}}\
&= frac{Dcos{(x_0)}e^{-Dt}}{cos{(x_0)}(e^{-Dt} - 1) + D}\
&= frac{De^{-Dt}}{e^{-Dt} + frac{D}{cos{(x_0)}}-1}\
end{align}
Perhaps I have errored, but this gradient only blows up if $e^{-Dt} = frac{D}{cos{x_0}} - 1,$ at some $t.$ Therefore, we need $D leq 2$ for this to happen at all.
I am a little surprised about this, that the RHS forcing term changes this answer from the normal result, i.e. blow up when $t = frac{-1}{cos{(x_0)}}.$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks, it looks promising and I will look into it in detail.
$endgroup$
– dezdichado
Aug 24 '17 at 19:16
$begingroup$
@dezdichado There is a sign mistake in the expression of the characteristic curves $x=dots$ here (see my answer). This explains the inconsistency pointed out by the answerer.
$endgroup$
– Harry49
Aug 31 '18 at 11:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First, it should be clearly stated what $D$ is here. Many times it represents a differential operator, but here I assume it is meant to be an arbitrary constant. I'll rewrite the equation with $q = u_x, p = u_t, z = u,$ so that $F(p,q,z) = 0,$
$$p - zq + Dz = 0.$$
Next, apply the method of characteristics, where only the $z, x$ characteristics are needed since its not fully nonlinear.
begin{align}
frac{dz}{dt} &= q partial_q F + p partial_p F = p -zq = -Dz; ;; z(x_0,0) = sin(x_0)\
frac{dx}{dt} &= partial_q F = -z; ;; x(t = 0) = x_0.
end{align}
Solving these gives us our solution,
begin{align}
z(x_0,t) &= sin(x_0)e^{-Dt}\
x &= frac{sin{(x_0)}(e^{-Dt} - 1) + Dx_0}{D}
end{align}
Now if we could solve the latter equation for $x_0 = x_0(x,t),$ we could plug this back into the equation for $z(x_0,t)$ to get $u(x,t)$ explicitly.
If I wanted to show a finite time blow up, I'd formally take the $x$ derivative of $z(x_0,t),$
begin{align}
frac{dz}{dx} &= cos{(x_0)}e^{-Dt}frac{dx_0}{dx} = cos{(x_0)}e^{-Dt} frac{1}{frac{dx}{dx_0}}\
&= frac{Dcos{(x_0)}e^{-Dt}}{cos{(x_0)}(e^{-Dt} - 1) + D}\
&= frac{De^{-Dt}}{e^{-Dt} + frac{D}{cos{(x_0)}}-1}\
end{align}
Perhaps I have errored, but this gradient only blows up if $e^{-Dt} = frac{D}{cos{x_0}} - 1,$ at some $t.$ Therefore, we need $D leq 2$ for this to happen at all.
I am a little surprised about this, that the RHS forcing term changes this answer from the normal result, i.e. blow up when $t = frac{-1}{cos{(x_0)}}.$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks, it looks promising and I will look into it in detail.
$endgroup$
– dezdichado
Aug 24 '17 at 19:16
$begingroup$
@dezdichado There is a sign mistake in the expression of the characteristic curves $x=dots$ here (see my answer). This explains the inconsistency pointed out by the answerer.
$endgroup$
– Harry49
Aug 31 '18 at 11:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First, it should be clearly stated what $D$ is here. Many times it represents a differential operator, but here I assume it is meant to be an arbitrary constant. I'll rewrite the equation with $q = u_x, p = u_t, z = u,$ so that $F(p,q,z) = 0,$
$$p - zq + Dz = 0.$$
Next, apply the method of characteristics, where only the $z, x$ characteristics are needed since its not fully nonlinear.
begin{align}
frac{dz}{dt} &= q partial_q F + p partial_p F = p -zq = -Dz; ;; z(x_0,0) = sin(x_0)\
frac{dx}{dt} &= partial_q F = -z; ;; x(t = 0) = x_0.
end{align}
Solving these gives us our solution,
begin{align}
z(x_0,t) &= sin(x_0)e^{-Dt}\
x &= frac{sin{(x_0)}(e^{-Dt} - 1) + Dx_0}{D}
end{align}
Now if we could solve the latter equation for $x_0 = x_0(x,t),$ we could plug this back into the equation for $z(x_0,t)$ to get $u(x,t)$ explicitly.
If I wanted to show a finite time blow up, I'd formally take the $x$ derivative of $z(x_0,t),$
begin{align}
frac{dz}{dx} &= cos{(x_0)}e^{-Dt}frac{dx_0}{dx} = cos{(x_0)}e^{-Dt} frac{1}{frac{dx}{dx_0}}\
&= frac{Dcos{(x_0)}e^{-Dt}}{cos{(x_0)}(e^{-Dt} - 1) + D}\
&= frac{De^{-Dt}}{e^{-Dt} + frac{D}{cos{(x_0)}}-1}\
end{align}
Perhaps I have errored, but this gradient only blows up if $e^{-Dt} = frac{D}{cos{x_0}} - 1,$ at some $t.$ Therefore, we need $D leq 2$ for this to happen at all.
I am a little surprised about this, that the RHS forcing term changes this answer from the normal result, i.e. blow up when $t = frac{-1}{cos{(x_0)}}.$
$endgroup$
First, it should be clearly stated what $D$ is here. Many times it represents a differential operator, but here I assume it is meant to be an arbitrary constant. I'll rewrite the equation with $q = u_x, p = u_t, z = u,$ so that $F(p,q,z) = 0,$
$$p - zq + Dz = 0.$$
Next, apply the method of characteristics, where only the $z, x$ characteristics are needed since its not fully nonlinear.
begin{align}
frac{dz}{dt} &= q partial_q F + p partial_p F = p -zq = -Dz; ;; z(x_0,0) = sin(x_0)\
frac{dx}{dt} &= partial_q F = -z; ;; x(t = 0) = x_0.
end{align}
Solving these gives us our solution,
begin{align}
z(x_0,t) &= sin(x_0)e^{-Dt}\
x &= frac{sin{(x_0)}(e^{-Dt} - 1) + Dx_0}{D}
end{align}
Now if we could solve the latter equation for $x_0 = x_0(x,t),$ we could plug this back into the equation for $z(x_0,t)$ to get $u(x,t)$ explicitly.
If I wanted to show a finite time blow up, I'd formally take the $x$ derivative of $z(x_0,t),$
begin{align}
frac{dz}{dx} &= cos{(x_0)}e^{-Dt}frac{dx_0}{dx} = cos{(x_0)}e^{-Dt} frac{1}{frac{dx}{dx_0}}\
&= frac{Dcos{(x_0)}e^{-Dt}}{cos{(x_0)}(e^{-Dt} - 1) + D}\
&= frac{De^{-Dt}}{e^{-Dt} + frac{D}{cos{(x_0)}}-1}\
end{align}
Perhaps I have errored, but this gradient only blows up if $e^{-Dt} = frac{D}{cos{x_0}} - 1,$ at some $t.$ Therefore, we need $D leq 2$ for this to happen at all.
I am a little surprised about this, that the RHS forcing term changes this answer from the normal result, i.e. blow up when $t = frac{-1}{cos{(x_0)}}.$
answered Aug 24 '17 at 15:02
MerkhMerkh
2,312619
2,312619
$begingroup$
Thanks, it looks promising and I will look into it in detail.
$endgroup$
– dezdichado
Aug 24 '17 at 19:16
$begingroup$
@dezdichado There is a sign mistake in the expression of the characteristic curves $x=dots$ here (see my answer). This explains the inconsistency pointed out by the answerer.
$endgroup$
– Harry49
Aug 31 '18 at 11:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks, it looks promising and I will look into it in detail.
$endgroup$
– dezdichado
Aug 24 '17 at 19:16
$begingroup$
@dezdichado There is a sign mistake in the expression of the characteristic curves $x=dots$ here (see my answer). This explains the inconsistency pointed out by the answerer.
$endgroup$
– Harry49
Aug 31 '18 at 11:27
$begingroup$
Thanks, it looks promising and I will look into it in detail.
$endgroup$
– dezdichado
Aug 24 '17 at 19:16
$begingroup$
Thanks, it looks promising and I will look into it in detail.
$endgroup$
– dezdichado
Aug 24 '17 at 19:16
$begingroup$
@dezdichado There is a sign mistake in the expression of the characteristic curves $x=dots$ here (see my answer). This explains the inconsistency pointed out by the answerer.
$endgroup$
– Harry49
Aug 31 '18 at 11:27
$begingroup$
@dezdichado There is a sign mistake in the expression of the characteristic curves $x=dots$ here (see my answer). This explains the inconsistency pointed out by the answerer.
$endgroup$
– Harry49
Aug 31 '18 at 11:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This (dissipative) Burgers' equation with relaxation is a typical example of conditional shock formation. The method of characteristics gives
$frac{text d t}{text d s} = 1$. Letting $t(0) = 0$, we have $t=s$.
$frac{text d u}{text d s} = -Du$. Letting $u(0) = sin x_0$, we have $u = sin (x_0), e^{-Ds}$.
$frac{text d x}{text d s} = u$. Letting $x(0) = x_0$, we have $x = -frac{1}{D} sin(x_0)(e^{-Ds}-1) + x_0$.
This is sometimes written in implicit form as $$u = sinleft(x - frac{e^{Dt}-1}{D} uright) e^{-Dt}, .$$
Now, let us compute the breaking time. Differentiating $x$ w.r.t. $x_0$ , we have $frac{text d x}{text d x_0} = -frac{1}{D} cos(x_0)(e^{-Dt}-1) + 1$. This quantity vanishes at $t = frac{1}{D}lnleft(frac{cos x_0}{D + cos x_0}right)$, where characteristics intersect. The smallest such positive time corresponds to the breaking time $T_s$, i.e.
$$
T_s = frac{1}{D}lnleft(frac{1}{1-D}right) ,quad text{if}quad D < 1 , .
$$
Otherwise, if $Dgeqslant 1$, no shock occurs.
Alternatively, one can follow the method leading to Eq. (6.10) p. 36 of (1). Differentiating the PDE with respect to $x$ gives
$$
u_{tx} + (u_x)^2 + u u_{xx} = -Du_x , .
$$
Now, we introduce $q = u_x$ and the directional derivative $q' = q_t + u q_x$, so that the previous equation rewrites as
$q' + q^2 = -D q$.
This Bernoulli differential equation has the solution
$$
q(t) = frac{D q_0}{(D + q_0) e^{Dt}- q_0} , ,
$$
where $q_0 = q(0) = cos x_0$. Therefore, $q$ blows up at $t = frac{1}{D}lnleft(frac{cos x_0}{D + cos x_0}right)$, and the same expression of $T_s$ is obtained.
(1) P.D. Lax, Hyperbolic systems of conservation laws and the mathematical theory of shock waves. SIAM, 1973. doi:10.1137/1.9781611970562.ch1
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This (dissipative) Burgers' equation with relaxation is a typical example of conditional shock formation. The method of characteristics gives
$frac{text d t}{text d s} = 1$. Letting $t(0) = 0$, we have $t=s$.
$frac{text d u}{text d s} = -Du$. Letting $u(0) = sin x_0$, we have $u = sin (x_0), e^{-Ds}$.
$frac{text d x}{text d s} = u$. Letting $x(0) = x_0$, we have $x = -frac{1}{D} sin(x_0)(e^{-Ds}-1) + x_0$.
This is sometimes written in implicit form as $$u = sinleft(x - frac{e^{Dt}-1}{D} uright) e^{-Dt}, .$$
Now, let us compute the breaking time. Differentiating $x$ w.r.t. $x_0$ , we have $frac{text d x}{text d x_0} = -frac{1}{D} cos(x_0)(e^{-Dt}-1) + 1$. This quantity vanishes at $t = frac{1}{D}lnleft(frac{cos x_0}{D + cos x_0}right)$, where characteristics intersect. The smallest such positive time corresponds to the breaking time $T_s$, i.e.
$$
T_s = frac{1}{D}lnleft(frac{1}{1-D}right) ,quad text{if}quad D < 1 , .
$$
Otherwise, if $Dgeqslant 1$, no shock occurs.
Alternatively, one can follow the method leading to Eq. (6.10) p. 36 of (1). Differentiating the PDE with respect to $x$ gives
$$
u_{tx} + (u_x)^2 + u u_{xx} = -Du_x , .
$$
Now, we introduce $q = u_x$ and the directional derivative $q' = q_t + u q_x$, so that the previous equation rewrites as
$q' + q^2 = -D q$.
This Bernoulli differential equation has the solution
$$
q(t) = frac{D q_0}{(D + q_0) e^{Dt}- q_0} , ,
$$
where $q_0 = q(0) = cos x_0$. Therefore, $q$ blows up at $t = frac{1}{D}lnleft(frac{cos x_0}{D + cos x_0}right)$, and the same expression of $T_s$ is obtained.
(1) P.D. Lax, Hyperbolic systems of conservation laws and the mathematical theory of shock waves. SIAM, 1973. doi:10.1137/1.9781611970562.ch1
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This (dissipative) Burgers' equation with relaxation is a typical example of conditional shock formation. The method of characteristics gives
$frac{text d t}{text d s} = 1$. Letting $t(0) = 0$, we have $t=s$.
$frac{text d u}{text d s} = -Du$. Letting $u(0) = sin x_0$, we have $u = sin (x_0), e^{-Ds}$.
$frac{text d x}{text d s} = u$. Letting $x(0) = x_0$, we have $x = -frac{1}{D} sin(x_0)(e^{-Ds}-1) + x_0$.
This is sometimes written in implicit form as $$u = sinleft(x - frac{e^{Dt}-1}{D} uright) e^{-Dt}, .$$
Now, let us compute the breaking time. Differentiating $x$ w.r.t. $x_0$ , we have $frac{text d x}{text d x_0} = -frac{1}{D} cos(x_0)(e^{-Dt}-1) + 1$. This quantity vanishes at $t = frac{1}{D}lnleft(frac{cos x_0}{D + cos x_0}right)$, where characteristics intersect. The smallest such positive time corresponds to the breaking time $T_s$, i.e.
$$
T_s = frac{1}{D}lnleft(frac{1}{1-D}right) ,quad text{if}quad D < 1 , .
$$
Otherwise, if $Dgeqslant 1$, no shock occurs.
Alternatively, one can follow the method leading to Eq. (6.10) p. 36 of (1). Differentiating the PDE with respect to $x$ gives
$$
u_{tx} + (u_x)^2 + u u_{xx} = -Du_x , .
$$
Now, we introduce $q = u_x$ and the directional derivative $q' = q_t + u q_x$, so that the previous equation rewrites as
$q' + q^2 = -D q$.
This Bernoulli differential equation has the solution
$$
q(t) = frac{D q_0}{(D + q_0) e^{Dt}- q_0} , ,
$$
where $q_0 = q(0) = cos x_0$. Therefore, $q$ blows up at $t = frac{1}{D}lnleft(frac{cos x_0}{D + cos x_0}right)$, and the same expression of $T_s$ is obtained.
(1) P.D. Lax, Hyperbolic systems of conservation laws and the mathematical theory of shock waves. SIAM, 1973. doi:10.1137/1.9781611970562.ch1
$endgroup$
This (dissipative) Burgers' equation with relaxation is a typical example of conditional shock formation. The method of characteristics gives
$frac{text d t}{text d s} = 1$. Letting $t(0) = 0$, we have $t=s$.
$frac{text d u}{text d s} = -Du$. Letting $u(0) = sin x_0$, we have $u = sin (x_0), e^{-Ds}$.
$frac{text d x}{text d s} = u$. Letting $x(0) = x_0$, we have $x = -frac{1}{D} sin(x_0)(e^{-Ds}-1) + x_0$.
This is sometimes written in implicit form as $$u = sinleft(x - frac{e^{Dt}-1}{D} uright) e^{-Dt}, .$$
Now, let us compute the breaking time. Differentiating $x$ w.r.t. $x_0$ , we have $frac{text d x}{text d x_0} = -frac{1}{D} cos(x_0)(e^{-Dt}-1) + 1$. This quantity vanishes at $t = frac{1}{D}lnleft(frac{cos x_0}{D + cos x_0}right)$, where characteristics intersect. The smallest such positive time corresponds to the breaking time $T_s$, i.e.
$$
T_s = frac{1}{D}lnleft(frac{1}{1-D}right) ,quad text{if}quad D < 1 , .
$$
Otherwise, if $Dgeqslant 1$, no shock occurs.
Alternatively, one can follow the method leading to Eq. (6.10) p. 36 of (1). Differentiating the PDE with respect to $x$ gives
$$
u_{tx} + (u_x)^2 + u u_{xx} = -Du_x , .
$$
Now, we introduce $q = u_x$ and the directional derivative $q' = q_t + u q_x$, so that the previous equation rewrites as
$q' + q^2 = -D q$.
This Bernoulli differential equation has the solution
$$
q(t) = frac{D q_0}{(D + q_0) e^{Dt}- q_0} , ,
$$
where $q_0 = q(0) = cos x_0$. Therefore, $q$ blows up at $t = frac{1}{D}lnleft(frac{cos x_0}{D + cos x_0}right)$, and the same expression of $T_s$ is obtained.
(1) P.D. Lax, Hyperbolic systems of conservation laws and the mathematical theory of shock waves. SIAM, 1973. doi:10.1137/1.9781611970562.ch1
edited Dec 6 '18 at 11:41
answered Aug 30 '18 at 15:45
Harry49Harry49
6,18331132
6,18331132
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2403982%2finhomogenous-nonlinear-transport-equation-u-tuu-x-du%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown