Integral with Euler-Mascheroni constant












4












$begingroup$


I want to solve the following integral
$$int_0^infty frac{sin{x}ln{x}}{x}dx$$



To make things worse (or better?), I parameterize the sine function to $e^{-ax}$.
begin{align*}
I(a)&=int_{0}^inftyfrac{e^{-ax}ln{x}}{x}dx\
frac{dI}{da}&=-int_{0}^infty e^{-ax}ln{x}dx\
&=-frac{1}{a}int_0^infty e^{-t}+frac{ln{a}}{a}int_0^{infty}e^{-t}dt
end{align*}

knowing th value of the individual integrals, I can conclude(?)
$$int_0^{infty}frac{e^{-ax}ln{x}}{x}dx=gammaln{a}+frac{ln^2{a}}{2}$$
solving for $a=i,ln{i}=frac{ipi}{2}$ and considering only the imaginary value,
$$int_0^inftyfrac{sin{x}ln{x}}{x}dx=-frac{gammapi}{2}$$
which by any chance correct, even though the real part does not. Can someone please tell me the mistakes?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    When you change from real variables to complex variables, you need to change the limits of integration as well.
    $endgroup$
    – TheSimpliFire
    Dec 26 '18 at 15:17
















4












$begingroup$


I want to solve the following integral
$$int_0^infty frac{sin{x}ln{x}}{x}dx$$



To make things worse (or better?), I parameterize the sine function to $e^{-ax}$.
begin{align*}
I(a)&=int_{0}^inftyfrac{e^{-ax}ln{x}}{x}dx\
frac{dI}{da}&=-int_{0}^infty e^{-ax}ln{x}dx\
&=-frac{1}{a}int_0^infty e^{-t}+frac{ln{a}}{a}int_0^{infty}e^{-t}dt
end{align*}

knowing th value of the individual integrals, I can conclude(?)
$$int_0^{infty}frac{e^{-ax}ln{x}}{x}dx=gammaln{a}+frac{ln^2{a}}{2}$$
solving for $a=i,ln{i}=frac{ipi}{2}$ and considering only the imaginary value,
$$int_0^inftyfrac{sin{x}ln{x}}{x}dx=-frac{gammapi}{2}$$
which by any chance correct, even though the real part does not. Can someone please tell me the mistakes?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    When you change from real variables to complex variables, you need to change the limits of integration as well.
    $endgroup$
    – TheSimpliFire
    Dec 26 '18 at 15:17














4












4








4


0



$begingroup$


I want to solve the following integral
$$int_0^infty frac{sin{x}ln{x}}{x}dx$$



To make things worse (or better?), I parameterize the sine function to $e^{-ax}$.
begin{align*}
I(a)&=int_{0}^inftyfrac{e^{-ax}ln{x}}{x}dx\
frac{dI}{da}&=-int_{0}^infty e^{-ax}ln{x}dx\
&=-frac{1}{a}int_0^infty e^{-t}+frac{ln{a}}{a}int_0^{infty}e^{-t}dt
end{align*}

knowing th value of the individual integrals, I can conclude(?)
$$int_0^{infty}frac{e^{-ax}ln{x}}{x}dx=gammaln{a}+frac{ln^2{a}}{2}$$
solving for $a=i,ln{i}=frac{ipi}{2}$ and considering only the imaginary value,
$$int_0^inftyfrac{sin{x}ln{x}}{x}dx=-frac{gammapi}{2}$$
which by any chance correct, even though the real part does not. Can someone please tell me the mistakes?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I want to solve the following integral
$$int_0^infty frac{sin{x}ln{x}}{x}dx$$



To make things worse (or better?), I parameterize the sine function to $e^{-ax}$.
begin{align*}
I(a)&=int_{0}^inftyfrac{e^{-ax}ln{x}}{x}dx\
frac{dI}{da}&=-int_{0}^infty e^{-ax}ln{x}dx\
&=-frac{1}{a}int_0^infty e^{-t}+frac{ln{a}}{a}int_0^{infty}e^{-t}dt
end{align*}

knowing th value of the individual integrals, I can conclude(?)
$$int_0^{infty}frac{e^{-ax}ln{x}}{x}dx=gammaln{a}+frac{ln^2{a}}{2}$$
solving for $a=i,ln{i}=frac{ipi}{2}$ and considering only the imaginary value,
$$int_0^inftyfrac{sin{x}ln{x}}{x}dx=-frac{gammapi}{2}$$
which by any chance correct, even though the real part does not. Can someone please tell me the mistakes?







definite-integrals eulers-constant






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 26 '18 at 15:10









Reynan HenryReynan Henry

853




853








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    When you change from real variables to complex variables, you need to change the limits of integration as well.
    $endgroup$
    – TheSimpliFire
    Dec 26 '18 at 15:17














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    When you change from real variables to complex variables, you need to change the limits of integration as well.
    $endgroup$
    – TheSimpliFire
    Dec 26 '18 at 15:17








2




2




$begingroup$
When you change from real variables to complex variables, you need to change the limits of integration as well.
$endgroup$
– TheSimpliFire
Dec 26 '18 at 15:17




$begingroup$
When you change from real variables to complex variables, you need to change the limits of integration as well.
$endgroup$
– TheSimpliFire
Dec 26 '18 at 15:17










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

As already mentioned by TheSimpliFire you cannot simply change from real to complex variables without any changes within your solution. I will present you a solution which does not rely on complex analysis at all.





Recently reading this post dealing with related integrals I have finally found a way to evaluate your integral. However, the crucial part we are in need of is precisely the Mellin Transform of the sine function which is given by




$$mathcal M_s{sin(x)}~=~int_0^infty x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx~=~Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)tag1$$




Here $Gamma(z)$ denotes the Gamma Function. There are different possible ways to show this relation, for myself I prefer using Ramanujan's Master Theorem as it is done here for example $($just substitute $s$ by $-s$$)$, but I will leave this out for now hence it is not of our concern. Note that we can use a variation of Feynman's Trick, i.e. Differentation under the Integral Sign. Before applying this technique we may rewrite the RHS of $(1)$ in the following way



$$Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)=Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)frac{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}=frac1{{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}}Gamma(s)sin(pi s)=fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}$$



Here we used Euler's Reflection Formula. Even though the new form seems to be more complicated in the context of taking derivatives it actually prevents us from running into indefinite expressions which are harder to deal with. Anyway, differentiating w.r.t. $s$ leads us to



begin{align*}
frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}int_0^infty x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx&=frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}\
int_0^infty frac{partial}{partial s}x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}\
int_0^infty x^{s-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2left[frac1{cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}frac{-(-1)Gamma'(1-s)}{Gamma^2(1-s)}+frac1{Gamma(1-s)}frac{-fracpi2sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{pi s}2right)}right]\
int_0^infty x^{s-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2left[frac1{cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}frac{psi^{(0)}(1-s)}{Gamma(1-s)}-fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)}frac{sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{pi s}2right)}right]
end{align*}



Now we are basically done. Hence every occuring term is defined at $s=0$ we can simply plug in this value. Utilizing that the Digamma Function $psi^{(0)}(z)$ is closely related to the Euler-Mascheroni Constant we can deduce that



$$int_0^infty x^{0-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx=fracpi2left[underbrace{frac1{cosleft(frac{picdot0}2right)}frac{psi^{(0)}(1-0)}{Gamma(1-0)}}_{=-gamma}-underbrace{fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-0)}frac{sinleft(frac{picdot0}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{picdot0}2right)}}_{=0}right]$$




$$therefore~int_0^infty frac{log(x)sin(x)}xmathrm dx~=~-frac{gammapi}2$$







share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053019%2fintegral-with-euler-mascheroni-constant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    As already mentioned by TheSimpliFire you cannot simply change from real to complex variables without any changes within your solution. I will present you a solution which does not rely on complex analysis at all.





    Recently reading this post dealing with related integrals I have finally found a way to evaluate your integral. However, the crucial part we are in need of is precisely the Mellin Transform of the sine function which is given by




    $$mathcal M_s{sin(x)}~=~int_0^infty x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx~=~Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)tag1$$




    Here $Gamma(z)$ denotes the Gamma Function. There are different possible ways to show this relation, for myself I prefer using Ramanujan's Master Theorem as it is done here for example $($just substitute $s$ by $-s$$)$, but I will leave this out for now hence it is not of our concern. Note that we can use a variation of Feynman's Trick, i.e. Differentation under the Integral Sign. Before applying this technique we may rewrite the RHS of $(1)$ in the following way



    $$Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)=Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)frac{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}=frac1{{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}}Gamma(s)sin(pi s)=fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}$$



    Here we used Euler's Reflection Formula. Even though the new form seems to be more complicated in the context of taking derivatives it actually prevents us from running into indefinite expressions which are harder to deal with. Anyway, differentiating w.r.t. $s$ leads us to



    begin{align*}
    frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}int_0^infty x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx&=frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}\
    int_0^infty frac{partial}{partial s}x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}\
    int_0^infty x^{s-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2left[frac1{cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}frac{-(-1)Gamma'(1-s)}{Gamma^2(1-s)}+frac1{Gamma(1-s)}frac{-fracpi2sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{pi s}2right)}right]\
    int_0^infty x^{s-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2left[frac1{cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}frac{psi^{(0)}(1-s)}{Gamma(1-s)}-fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)}frac{sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{pi s}2right)}right]
    end{align*}



    Now we are basically done. Hence every occuring term is defined at $s=0$ we can simply plug in this value. Utilizing that the Digamma Function $psi^{(0)}(z)$ is closely related to the Euler-Mascheroni Constant we can deduce that



    $$int_0^infty x^{0-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx=fracpi2left[underbrace{frac1{cosleft(frac{picdot0}2right)}frac{psi^{(0)}(1-0)}{Gamma(1-0)}}_{=-gamma}-underbrace{fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-0)}frac{sinleft(frac{picdot0}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{picdot0}2right)}}_{=0}right]$$




    $$therefore~int_0^infty frac{log(x)sin(x)}xmathrm dx~=~-frac{gammapi}2$$







    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      As already mentioned by TheSimpliFire you cannot simply change from real to complex variables without any changes within your solution. I will present you a solution which does not rely on complex analysis at all.





      Recently reading this post dealing with related integrals I have finally found a way to evaluate your integral. However, the crucial part we are in need of is precisely the Mellin Transform of the sine function which is given by




      $$mathcal M_s{sin(x)}~=~int_0^infty x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx~=~Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)tag1$$




      Here $Gamma(z)$ denotes the Gamma Function. There are different possible ways to show this relation, for myself I prefer using Ramanujan's Master Theorem as it is done here for example $($just substitute $s$ by $-s$$)$, but I will leave this out for now hence it is not of our concern. Note that we can use a variation of Feynman's Trick, i.e. Differentation under the Integral Sign. Before applying this technique we may rewrite the RHS of $(1)$ in the following way



      $$Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)=Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)frac{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}=frac1{{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}}Gamma(s)sin(pi s)=fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}$$



      Here we used Euler's Reflection Formula. Even though the new form seems to be more complicated in the context of taking derivatives it actually prevents us from running into indefinite expressions which are harder to deal with. Anyway, differentiating w.r.t. $s$ leads us to



      begin{align*}
      frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}int_0^infty x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx&=frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}\
      int_0^infty frac{partial}{partial s}x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}\
      int_0^infty x^{s-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2left[frac1{cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}frac{-(-1)Gamma'(1-s)}{Gamma^2(1-s)}+frac1{Gamma(1-s)}frac{-fracpi2sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{pi s}2right)}right]\
      int_0^infty x^{s-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2left[frac1{cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}frac{psi^{(0)}(1-s)}{Gamma(1-s)}-fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)}frac{sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{pi s}2right)}right]
      end{align*}



      Now we are basically done. Hence every occuring term is defined at $s=0$ we can simply plug in this value. Utilizing that the Digamma Function $psi^{(0)}(z)$ is closely related to the Euler-Mascheroni Constant we can deduce that



      $$int_0^infty x^{0-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx=fracpi2left[underbrace{frac1{cosleft(frac{picdot0}2right)}frac{psi^{(0)}(1-0)}{Gamma(1-0)}}_{=-gamma}-underbrace{fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-0)}frac{sinleft(frac{picdot0}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{picdot0}2right)}}_{=0}right]$$




      $$therefore~int_0^infty frac{log(x)sin(x)}xmathrm dx~=~-frac{gammapi}2$$







      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        As already mentioned by TheSimpliFire you cannot simply change from real to complex variables without any changes within your solution. I will present you a solution which does not rely on complex analysis at all.





        Recently reading this post dealing with related integrals I have finally found a way to evaluate your integral. However, the crucial part we are in need of is precisely the Mellin Transform of the sine function which is given by




        $$mathcal M_s{sin(x)}~=~int_0^infty x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx~=~Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)tag1$$




        Here $Gamma(z)$ denotes the Gamma Function. There are different possible ways to show this relation, for myself I prefer using Ramanujan's Master Theorem as it is done here for example $($just substitute $s$ by $-s$$)$, but I will leave this out for now hence it is not of our concern. Note that we can use a variation of Feynman's Trick, i.e. Differentation under the Integral Sign. Before applying this technique we may rewrite the RHS of $(1)$ in the following way



        $$Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)=Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)frac{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}=frac1{{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}}Gamma(s)sin(pi s)=fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}$$



        Here we used Euler's Reflection Formula. Even though the new form seems to be more complicated in the context of taking derivatives it actually prevents us from running into indefinite expressions which are harder to deal with. Anyway, differentiating w.r.t. $s$ leads us to



        begin{align*}
        frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}int_0^infty x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx&=frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}\
        int_0^infty frac{partial}{partial s}x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}\
        int_0^infty x^{s-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2left[frac1{cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}frac{-(-1)Gamma'(1-s)}{Gamma^2(1-s)}+frac1{Gamma(1-s)}frac{-fracpi2sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{pi s}2right)}right]\
        int_0^infty x^{s-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2left[frac1{cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}frac{psi^{(0)}(1-s)}{Gamma(1-s)}-fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)}frac{sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{pi s}2right)}right]
        end{align*}



        Now we are basically done. Hence every occuring term is defined at $s=0$ we can simply plug in this value. Utilizing that the Digamma Function $psi^{(0)}(z)$ is closely related to the Euler-Mascheroni Constant we can deduce that



        $$int_0^infty x^{0-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx=fracpi2left[underbrace{frac1{cosleft(frac{picdot0}2right)}frac{psi^{(0)}(1-0)}{Gamma(1-0)}}_{=-gamma}-underbrace{fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-0)}frac{sinleft(frac{picdot0}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{picdot0}2right)}}_{=0}right]$$




        $$therefore~int_0^infty frac{log(x)sin(x)}xmathrm dx~=~-frac{gammapi}2$$







        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        As already mentioned by TheSimpliFire you cannot simply change from real to complex variables without any changes within your solution. I will present you a solution which does not rely on complex analysis at all.





        Recently reading this post dealing with related integrals I have finally found a way to evaluate your integral. However, the crucial part we are in need of is precisely the Mellin Transform of the sine function which is given by




        $$mathcal M_s{sin(x)}~=~int_0^infty x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx~=~Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)tag1$$




        Here $Gamma(z)$ denotes the Gamma Function. There are different possible ways to show this relation, for myself I prefer using Ramanujan's Master Theorem as it is done here for example $($just substitute $s$ by $-s$$)$, but I will leave this out for now hence it is not of our concern. Note that we can use a variation of Feynman's Trick, i.e. Differentation under the Integral Sign. Before applying this technique we may rewrite the RHS of $(1)$ in the following way



        $$Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)=Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)frac{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}=frac1{{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}}Gamma(s)sin(pi s)=fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}$$



        Here we used Euler's Reflection Formula. Even though the new form seems to be more complicated in the context of taking derivatives it actually prevents us from running into indefinite expressions which are harder to deal with. Anyway, differentiating w.r.t. $s$ leads us to



        begin{align*}
        frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}int_0^infty x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx&=frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}\
        int_0^infty frac{partial}{partial s}x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}\
        int_0^infty x^{s-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2left[frac1{cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}frac{-(-1)Gamma'(1-s)}{Gamma^2(1-s)}+frac1{Gamma(1-s)}frac{-fracpi2sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{pi s}2right)}right]\
        int_0^infty x^{s-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2left[frac1{cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}frac{psi^{(0)}(1-s)}{Gamma(1-s)}-fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)}frac{sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{pi s}2right)}right]
        end{align*}



        Now we are basically done. Hence every occuring term is defined at $s=0$ we can simply plug in this value. Utilizing that the Digamma Function $psi^{(0)}(z)$ is closely related to the Euler-Mascheroni Constant we can deduce that



        $$int_0^infty x^{0-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx=fracpi2left[underbrace{frac1{cosleft(frac{picdot0}2right)}frac{psi^{(0)}(1-0)}{Gamma(1-0)}}_{=-gamma}-underbrace{fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-0)}frac{sinleft(frac{picdot0}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{picdot0}2right)}}_{=0}right]$$




        $$therefore~int_0^infty frac{log(x)sin(x)}xmathrm dx~=~-frac{gammapi}2$$








        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Feb 12 at 18:31









        mrtaurhomrtaurho

        6,12771641




        6,12771641






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053019%2fintegral-with-euler-mascheroni-constant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown