Integral with Euler-Mascheroni constant
$begingroup$
I want to solve the following integral
$$int_0^infty frac{sin{x}ln{x}}{x}dx$$
To make things worse (or better?), I parameterize the sine function to $e^{-ax}$.
begin{align*}
I(a)&=int_{0}^inftyfrac{e^{-ax}ln{x}}{x}dx\
frac{dI}{da}&=-int_{0}^infty e^{-ax}ln{x}dx\
&=-frac{1}{a}int_0^infty e^{-t}+frac{ln{a}}{a}int_0^{infty}e^{-t}dt
end{align*}
knowing th value of the individual integrals, I can conclude(?)
$$int_0^{infty}frac{e^{-ax}ln{x}}{x}dx=gammaln{a}+frac{ln^2{a}}{2}$$
solving for $a=i,ln{i}=frac{ipi}{2}$ and considering only the imaginary value,
$$int_0^inftyfrac{sin{x}ln{x}}{x}dx=-frac{gammapi}{2}$$
which by any chance correct, even though the real part does not. Can someone please tell me the mistakes?
definite-integrals eulers-constant
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want to solve the following integral
$$int_0^infty frac{sin{x}ln{x}}{x}dx$$
To make things worse (or better?), I parameterize the sine function to $e^{-ax}$.
begin{align*}
I(a)&=int_{0}^inftyfrac{e^{-ax}ln{x}}{x}dx\
frac{dI}{da}&=-int_{0}^infty e^{-ax}ln{x}dx\
&=-frac{1}{a}int_0^infty e^{-t}+frac{ln{a}}{a}int_0^{infty}e^{-t}dt
end{align*}
knowing th value of the individual integrals, I can conclude(?)
$$int_0^{infty}frac{e^{-ax}ln{x}}{x}dx=gammaln{a}+frac{ln^2{a}}{2}$$
solving for $a=i,ln{i}=frac{ipi}{2}$ and considering only the imaginary value,
$$int_0^inftyfrac{sin{x}ln{x}}{x}dx=-frac{gammapi}{2}$$
which by any chance correct, even though the real part does not. Can someone please tell me the mistakes?
definite-integrals eulers-constant
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
When you change from real variables to complex variables, you need to change the limits of integration as well.
$endgroup$
– TheSimpliFire
Dec 26 '18 at 15:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want to solve the following integral
$$int_0^infty frac{sin{x}ln{x}}{x}dx$$
To make things worse (or better?), I parameterize the sine function to $e^{-ax}$.
begin{align*}
I(a)&=int_{0}^inftyfrac{e^{-ax}ln{x}}{x}dx\
frac{dI}{da}&=-int_{0}^infty e^{-ax}ln{x}dx\
&=-frac{1}{a}int_0^infty e^{-t}+frac{ln{a}}{a}int_0^{infty}e^{-t}dt
end{align*}
knowing th value of the individual integrals, I can conclude(?)
$$int_0^{infty}frac{e^{-ax}ln{x}}{x}dx=gammaln{a}+frac{ln^2{a}}{2}$$
solving for $a=i,ln{i}=frac{ipi}{2}$ and considering only the imaginary value,
$$int_0^inftyfrac{sin{x}ln{x}}{x}dx=-frac{gammapi}{2}$$
which by any chance correct, even though the real part does not. Can someone please tell me the mistakes?
definite-integrals eulers-constant
$endgroup$
I want to solve the following integral
$$int_0^infty frac{sin{x}ln{x}}{x}dx$$
To make things worse (or better?), I parameterize the sine function to $e^{-ax}$.
begin{align*}
I(a)&=int_{0}^inftyfrac{e^{-ax}ln{x}}{x}dx\
frac{dI}{da}&=-int_{0}^infty e^{-ax}ln{x}dx\
&=-frac{1}{a}int_0^infty e^{-t}+frac{ln{a}}{a}int_0^{infty}e^{-t}dt
end{align*}
knowing th value of the individual integrals, I can conclude(?)
$$int_0^{infty}frac{e^{-ax}ln{x}}{x}dx=gammaln{a}+frac{ln^2{a}}{2}$$
solving for $a=i,ln{i}=frac{ipi}{2}$ and considering only the imaginary value,
$$int_0^inftyfrac{sin{x}ln{x}}{x}dx=-frac{gammapi}{2}$$
which by any chance correct, even though the real part does not. Can someone please tell me the mistakes?
definite-integrals eulers-constant
definite-integrals eulers-constant
asked Dec 26 '18 at 15:10
Reynan HenryReynan Henry
853
853
2
$begingroup$
When you change from real variables to complex variables, you need to change the limits of integration as well.
$endgroup$
– TheSimpliFire
Dec 26 '18 at 15:17
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
When you change from real variables to complex variables, you need to change the limits of integration as well.
$endgroup$
– TheSimpliFire
Dec 26 '18 at 15:17
2
2
$begingroup$
When you change from real variables to complex variables, you need to change the limits of integration as well.
$endgroup$
– TheSimpliFire
Dec 26 '18 at 15:17
$begingroup$
When you change from real variables to complex variables, you need to change the limits of integration as well.
$endgroup$
– TheSimpliFire
Dec 26 '18 at 15:17
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
As already mentioned by TheSimpliFire you cannot simply change from real to complex variables without any changes within your solution. I will present you a solution which does not rely on complex analysis at all.
Recently reading this post dealing with related integrals I have finally found a way to evaluate your integral. However, the crucial part we are in need of is precisely the Mellin Transform of the sine function which is given by
$$mathcal M_s{sin(x)}~=~int_0^infty x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx~=~Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)tag1$$
Here $Gamma(z)$ denotes the Gamma Function. There are different possible ways to show this relation, for myself I prefer using Ramanujan's Master Theorem as it is done here for example $($just substitute $s$ by $-s$$)$, but I will leave this out for now hence it is not of our concern. Note that we can use a variation of Feynman's Trick, i.e. Differentation under the Integral Sign. Before applying this technique we may rewrite the RHS of $(1)$ in the following way
$$Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)=Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)frac{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}=frac1{{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}}Gamma(s)sin(pi s)=fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}$$
Here we used Euler's Reflection Formula. Even though the new form seems to be more complicated in the context of taking derivatives it actually prevents us from running into indefinite expressions which are harder to deal with. Anyway, differentiating w.r.t. $s$ leads us to
begin{align*}
frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}int_0^infty x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx&=frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}\
int_0^infty frac{partial}{partial s}x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}\
int_0^infty x^{s-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2left[frac1{cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}frac{-(-1)Gamma'(1-s)}{Gamma^2(1-s)}+frac1{Gamma(1-s)}frac{-fracpi2sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{pi s}2right)}right]\
int_0^infty x^{s-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2left[frac1{cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}frac{psi^{(0)}(1-s)}{Gamma(1-s)}-fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)}frac{sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{pi s}2right)}right]
end{align*}
Now we are basically done. Hence every occuring term is defined at $s=0$ we can simply plug in this value. Utilizing that the Digamma Function $psi^{(0)}(z)$ is closely related to the Euler-Mascheroni Constant we can deduce that
$$int_0^infty x^{0-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx=fracpi2left[underbrace{frac1{cosleft(frac{picdot0}2right)}frac{psi^{(0)}(1-0)}{Gamma(1-0)}}_{=-gamma}-underbrace{fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-0)}frac{sinleft(frac{picdot0}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{picdot0}2right)}}_{=0}right]$$
$$therefore~int_0^infty frac{log(x)sin(x)}xmathrm dx~=~-frac{gammapi}2$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053019%2fintegral-with-euler-mascheroni-constant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
As already mentioned by TheSimpliFire you cannot simply change from real to complex variables without any changes within your solution. I will present you a solution which does not rely on complex analysis at all.
Recently reading this post dealing with related integrals I have finally found a way to evaluate your integral. However, the crucial part we are in need of is precisely the Mellin Transform of the sine function which is given by
$$mathcal M_s{sin(x)}~=~int_0^infty x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx~=~Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)tag1$$
Here $Gamma(z)$ denotes the Gamma Function. There are different possible ways to show this relation, for myself I prefer using Ramanujan's Master Theorem as it is done here for example $($just substitute $s$ by $-s$$)$, but I will leave this out for now hence it is not of our concern. Note that we can use a variation of Feynman's Trick, i.e. Differentation under the Integral Sign. Before applying this technique we may rewrite the RHS of $(1)$ in the following way
$$Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)=Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)frac{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}=frac1{{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}}Gamma(s)sin(pi s)=fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}$$
Here we used Euler's Reflection Formula. Even though the new form seems to be more complicated in the context of taking derivatives it actually prevents us from running into indefinite expressions which are harder to deal with. Anyway, differentiating w.r.t. $s$ leads us to
begin{align*}
frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}int_0^infty x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx&=frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}\
int_0^infty frac{partial}{partial s}x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}\
int_0^infty x^{s-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2left[frac1{cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}frac{-(-1)Gamma'(1-s)}{Gamma^2(1-s)}+frac1{Gamma(1-s)}frac{-fracpi2sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{pi s}2right)}right]\
int_0^infty x^{s-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2left[frac1{cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}frac{psi^{(0)}(1-s)}{Gamma(1-s)}-fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)}frac{sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{pi s}2right)}right]
end{align*}
Now we are basically done. Hence every occuring term is defined at $s=0$ we can simply plug in this value. Utilizing that the Digamma Function $psi^{(0)}(z)$ is closely related to the Euler-Mascheroni Constant we can deduce that
$$int_0^infty x^{0-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx=fracpi2left[underbrace{frac1{cosleft(frac{picdot0}2right)}frac{psi^{(0)}(1-0)}{Gamma(1-0)}}_{=-gamma}-underbrace{fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-0)}frac{sinleft(frac{picdot0}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{picdot0}2right)}}_{=0}right]$$
$$therefore~int_0^infty frac{log(x)sin(x)}xmathrm dx~=~-frac{gammapi}2$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As already mentioned by TheSimpliFire you cannot simply change from real to complex variables without any changes within your solution. I will present you a solution which does not rely on complex analysis at all.
Recently reading this post dealing with related integrals I have finally found a way to evaluate your integral. However, the crucial part we are in need of is precisely the Mellin Transform of the sine function which is given by
$$mathcal M_s{sin(x)}~=~int_0^infty x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx~=~Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)tag1$$
Here $Gamma(z)$ denotes the Gamma Function. There are different possible ways to show this relation, for myself I prefer using Ramanujan's Master Theorem as it is done here for example $($just substitute $s$ by $-s$$)$, but I will leave this out for now hence it is not of our concern. Note that we can use a variation of Feynman's Trick, i.e. Differentation under the Integral Sign. Before applying this technique we may rewrite the RHS of $(1)$ in the following way
$$Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)=Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)frac{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}=frac1{{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}}Gamma(s)sin(pi s)=fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}$$
Here we used Euler's Reflection Formula. Even though the new form seems to be more complicated in the context of taking derivatives it actually prevents us from running into indefinite expressions which are harder to deal with. Anyway, differentiating w.r.t. $s$ leads us to
begin{align*}
frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}int_0^infty x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx&=frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}\
int_0^infty frac{partial}{partial s}x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}\
int_0^infty x^{s-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2left[frac1{cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}frac{-(-1)Gamma'(1-s)}{Gamma^2(1-s)}+frac1{Gamma(1-s)}frac{-fracpi2sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{pi s}2right)}right]\
int_0^infty x^{s-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2left[frac1{cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}frac{psi^{(0)}(1-s)}{Gamma(1-s)}-fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)}frac{sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{pi s}2right)}right]
end{align*}
Now we are basically done. Hence every occuring term is defined at $s=0$ we can simply plug in this value. Utilizing that the Digamma Function $psi^{(0)}(z)$ is closely related to the Euler-Mascheroni Constant we can deduce that
$$int_0^infty x^{0-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx=fracpi2left[underbrace{frac1{cosleft(frac{picdot0}2right)}frac{psi^{(0)}(1-0)}{Gamma(1-0)}}_{=-gamma}-underbrace{fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-0)}frac{sinleft(frac{picdot0}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{picdot0}2right)}}_{=0}right]$$
$$therefore~int_0^infty frac{log(x)sin(x)}xmathrm dx~=~-frac{gammapi}2$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As already mentioned by TheSimpliFire you cannot simply change from real to complex variables without any changes within your solution. I will present you a solution which does not rely on complex analysis at all.
Recently reading this post dealing with related integrals I have finally found a way to evaluate your integral. However, the crucial part we are in need of is precisely the Mellin Transform of the sine function which is given by
$$mathcal M_s{sin(x)}~=~int_0^infty x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx~=~Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)tag1$$
Here $Gamma(z)$ denotes the Gamma Function. There are different possible ways to show this relation, for myself I prefer using Ramanujan's Master Theorem as it is done here for example $($just substitute $s$ by $-s$$)$, but I will leave this out for now hence it is not of our concern. Note that we can use a variation of Feynman's Trick, i.e. Differentation under the Integral Sign. Before applying this technique we may rewrite the RHS of $(1)$ in the following way
$$Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)=Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)frac{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}=frac1{{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}}Gamma(s)sin(pi s)=fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}$$
Here we used Euler's Reflection Formula. Even though the new form seems to be more complicated in the context of taking derivatives it actually prevents us from running into indefinite expressions which are harder to deal with. Anyway, differentiating w.r.t. $s$ leads us to
begin{align*}
frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}int_0^infty x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx&=frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}\
int_0^infty frac{partial}{partial s}x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}\
int_0^infty x^{s-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2left[frac1{cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}frac{-(-1)Gamma'(1-s)}{Gamma^2(1-s)}+frac1{Gamma(1-s)}frac{-fracpi2sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{pi s}2right)}right]\
int_0^infty x^{s-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2left[frac1{cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}frac{psi^{(0)}(1-s)}{Gamma(1-s)}-fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)}frac{sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{pi s}2right)}right]
end{align*}
Now we are basically done. Hence every occuring term is defined at $s=0$ we can simply plug in this value. Utilizing that the Digamma Function $psi^{(0)}(z)$ is closely related to the Euler-Mascheroni Constant we can deduce that
$$int_0^infty x^{0-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx=fracpi2left[underbrace{frac1{cosleft(frac{picdot0}2right)}frac{psi^{(0)}(1-0)}{Gamma(1-0)}}_{=-gamma}-underbrace{fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-0)}frac{sinleft(frac{picdot0}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{picdot0}2right)}}_{=0}right]$$
$$therefore~int_0^infty frac{log(x)sin(x)}xmathrm dx~=~-frac{gammapi}2$$
$endgroup$
As already mentioned by TheSimpliFire you cannot simply change from real to complex variables without any changes within your solution. I will present you a solution which does not rely on complex analysis at all.
Recently reading this post dealing with related integrals I have finally found a way to evaluate your integral. However, the crucial part we are in need of is precisely the Mellin Transform of the sine function which is given by
$$mathcal M_s{sin(x)}~=~int_0^infty x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx~=~Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)tag1$$
Here $Gamma(z)$ denotes the Gamma Function. There are different possible ways to show this relation, for myself I prefer using Ramanujan's Master Theorem as it is done here for example $($just substitute $s$ by $-s$$)$, but I will leave this out for now hence it is not of our concern. Note that we can use a variation of Feynman's Trick, i.e. Differentation under the Integral Sign. Before applying this technique we may rewrite the RHS of $(1)$ in the following way
$$Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)=Gamma(s)sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)frac{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}=frac1{{2cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}}Gamma(s)sin(pi s)=fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}$$
Here we used Euler's Reflection Formula. Even though the new form seems to be more complicated in the context of taking derivatives it actually prevents us from running into indefinite expressions which are harder to deal with. Anyway, differentiating w.r.t. $s$ leads us to
begin{align*}
frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}int_0^infty x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx&=frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}\
int_0^infty frac{partial}{partial s}x^{s-1}sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}frac1{Gamma(1-s)cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}\
int_0^infty x^{s-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2left[frac1{cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}frac{-(-1)Gamma'(1-s)}{Gamma^2(1-s)}+frac1{Gamma(1-s)}frac{-fracpi2sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{pi s}2right)}right]\
int_0^infty x^{s-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx&=fracpi2left[frac1{cosleft(frac{pi s}2right)}frac{psi^{(0)}(1-s)}{Gamma(1-s)}-fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-s)}frac{sinleft(frac{pi s}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{pi s}2right)}right]
end{align*}
Now we are basically done. Hence every occuring term is defined at $s=0$ we can simply plug in this value. Utilizing that the Digamma Function $psi^{(0)}(z)$ is closely related to the Euler-Mascheroni Constant we can deduce that
$$int_0^infty x^{0-1}log(x)sin(x)mathrm dx=fracpi2left[underbrace{frac1{cosleft(frac{picdot0}2right)}frac{psi^{(0)}(1-0)}{Gamma(1-0)}}_{=-gamma}-underbrace{fracpi2frac1{Gamma(1-0)}frac{sinleft(frac{picdot0}2right)}{cos^2left(frac{picdot0}2right)}}_{=0}right]$$
$$therefore~int_0^infty frac{log(x)sin(x)}xmathrm dx~=~-frac{gammapi}2$$
answered Feb 12 at 18:31
mrtaurhomrtaurho
6,12771641
6,12771641
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053019%2fintegral-with-euler-mascheroni-constant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
When you change from real variables to complex variables, you need to change the limits of integration as well.
$endgroup$
– TheSimpliFire
Dec 26 '18 at 15:17