Shorten fraction line
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
OK, I understand that this request may sound stupid, but my eyes are just bleeding when I see how $frac{x^-}{2}$
is rendered:
I'm wondering if there's a moderately simple way to make it look like this?
(Please do not suggest $frac{x^-}{2^{phantom{-}}}$
or $frac{{}^{phantom{-}}x^-}{2}$
.)
UPDATE
Well, OK, I've realized that frac{x}{2}^{-}
may work as a temporary solution, but now my eyes are bleeding when looking at the source code.
fractions
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
OK, I understand that this request may sound stupid, but my eyes are just bleeding when I see how $frac{x^-}{2}$
is rendered:
I'm wondering if there's a moderately simple way to make it look like this?
(Please do not suggest $frac{x^-}{2^{phantom{-}}}$
or $frac{{}^{phantom{-}}x^-}{2}$
.)
UPDATE
Well, OK, I've realized that frac{x}{2}^{-}
may work as a temporary solution, but now my eyes are bleeding when looking at the source code.
fractions
1
How aboutfrac{x^{mathmakebox[0pt][l]{-}}}{2}
withmathtools
?
– marmot
2 hours ago
Cool, thanks. What exactly is happening here?
– mavzolej
2 hours ago
(Even though, it would be preferable to ensure that minus does not stay above the following symbols.)
– mavzolej
2 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
OK, I understand that this request may sound stupid, but my eyes are just bleeding when I see how $frac{x^-}{2}$
is rendered:
I'm wondering if there's a moderately simple way to make it look like this?
(Please do not suggest $frac{x^-}{2^{phantom{-}}}$
or $frac{{}^{phantom{-}}x^-}{2}$
.)
UPDATE
Well, OK, I've realized that frac{x}{2}^{-}
may work as a temporary solution, but now my eyes are bleeding when looking at the source code.
fractions
OK, I understand that this request may sound stupid, but my eyes are just bleeding when I see how $frac{x^-}{2}$
is rendered:
I'm wondering if there's a moderately simple way to make it look like this?
(Please do not suggest $frac{x^-}{2^{phantom{-}}}$
or $frac{{}^{phantom{-}}x^-}{2}$
.)
UPDATE
Well, OK, I've realized that frac{x}{2}^{-}
may work as a temporary solution, but now my eyes are bleeding when looking at the source code.
fractions
fractions
edited 2 hours ago
asked 2 hours ago
mavzolej
1263
1263
1
How aboutfrac{x^{mathmakebox[0pt][l]{-}}}{2}
withmathtools
?
– marmot
2 hours ago
Cool, thanks. What exactly is happening here?
– mavzolej
2 hours ago
(Even though, it would be preferable to ensure that minus does not stay above the following symbols.)
– mavzolej
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1
How aboutfrac{x^{mathmakebox[0pt][l]{-}}}{2}
withmathtools
?
– marmot
2 hours ago
Cool, thanks. What exactly is happening here?
– mavzolej
2 hours ago
(Even though, it would be preferable to ensure that minus does not stay above the following symbols.)
– mavzolej
2 hours ago
1
1
How about
frac{x^{mathmakebox[0pt][l]{-}}}{2}
with mathtools
?– marmot
2 hours ago
How about
frac{x^{mathmakebox[0pt][l]{-}}}{2}
with mathtools
?– marmot
2 hours ago
Cool, thanks. What exactly is happening here?
– mavzolej
2 hours ago
Cool, thanks. What exactly is happening here?
– mavzolej
2 hours ago
(Even though, it would be preferable to ensure that minus does not stay above the following symbols.)
– mavzolej
2 hours ago
(Even though, it would be preferable to ensure that minus does not stay above the following symbols.)
– mavzolej
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
I'll be happy to remove this but you could do
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
[frac{x^{mathrlap{-}}}{2}hphantom{scriptstyle -}x]
end{document}
Not bad! This is smth that can be easily generalised for more complicated cases.
– mavzolej
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
I'll be happy to remove this but you could do
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
[frac{x^{mathrlap{-}}}{2}hphantom{scriptstyle -}x]
end{document}
Not bad! This is smth that can be easily generalised for more complicated cases.
– mavzolej
2 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
I'll be happy to remove this but you could do
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
[frac{x^{mathrlap{-}}}{2}hphantom{scriptstyle -}x]
end{document}
Not bad! This is smth that can be easily generalised for more complicated cases.
– mavzolej
2 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
I'll be happy to remove this but you could do
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
[frac{x^{mathrlap{-}}}{2}hphantom{scriptstyle -}x]
end{document}
I'll be happy to remove this but you could do
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
[frac{x^{mathrlap{-}}}{2}hphantom{scriptstyle -}x]
end{document}
answered 2 hours ago
marmot
79.3k488166
79.3k488166
Not bad! This is smth that can be easily generalised for more complicated cases.
– mavzolej
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Not bad! This is smth that can be easily generalised for more complicated cases.
– mavzolej
2 hours ago
Not bad! This is smth that can be easily generalised for more complicated cases.
– mavzolej
2 hours ago
Not bad! This is smth that can be easily generalised for more complicated cases.
– mavzolej
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f462509%2fshorten-fraction-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
How about
frac{x^{mathmakebox[0pt][l]{-}}}{2}
withmathtools
?– marmot
2 hours ago
Cool, thanks. What exactly is happening here?
– mavzolej
2 hours ago
(Even though, it would be preferable to ensure that minus does not stay above the following symbols.)
– mavzolej
2 hours ago