Underground condition preventing plant growth on a planet











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












As title, what condition could prevent plant growth from below a planet surface?
I've considered considered removing all water from the planet, both underground and above the surface, but that doesn't feel right.
Is there any other way to completely prevent any kind of flora from growing even with abundance of water sources?










share|improve this question







New contributor




user57841 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Either an absence of nutrients or trace elements or the presence of plant toxins.
    – a4android
    5 hours ago










  • Ecologists ran amok and scrubbed all carbon dioxide from the atmosphere? A future Elon Musk switched to lithium iron phosphate batteries and used up all the phosphorus? Global cooling froze all water? A careless alien janitor spilled a large amount of herbicide? A stupid industrial accident released a large amount of oxygen in the atmosphere?
    – AlexP
    4 hours ago










  • Not sure it's possible. Unless you have multiple conditions. I first thought of high levels of salt in the soil, but some plants thrive in the ocean or on its edges.
    – Cyn
    2 hours ago










  • Nothing! Life always finds a way, that is the whole point of evolution. Your best bet would be to not have life evolve in the first place.
    – nzaman
    50 mins ago










  • "No plant growth at all" means that the only possible life is simple chemosynthesizing microbes.
    – RonJohn
    49 mins ago















up vote
3
down vote

favorite












As title, what condition could prevent plant growth from below a planet surface?
I've considered considered removing all water from the planet, both underground and above the surface, but that doesn't feel right.
Is there any other way to completely prevent any kind of flora from growing even with abundance of water sources?










share|improve this question







New contributor




user57841 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Either an absence of nutrients or trace elements or the presence of plant toxins.
    – a4android
    5 hours ago










  • Ecologists ran amok and scrubbed all carbon dioxide from the atmosphere? A future Elon Musk switched to lithium iron phosphate batteries and used up all the phosphorus? Global cooling froze all water? A careless alien janitor spilled a large amount of herbicide? A stupid industrial accident released a large amount of oxygen in the atmosphere?
    – AlexP
    4 hours ago










  • Not sure it's possible. Unless you have multiple conditions. I first thought of high levels of salt in the soil, but some plants thrive in the ocean or on its edges.
    – Cyn
    2 hours ago










  • Nothing! Life always finds a way, that is the whole point of evolution. Your best bet would be to not have life evolve in the first place.
    – nzaman
    50 mins ago










  • "No plant growth at all" means that the only possible life is simple chemosynthesizing microbes.
    – RonJohn
    49 mins ago













up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











As title, what condition could prevent plant growth from below a planet surface?
I've considered considered removing all water from the planet, both underground and above the surface, but that doesn't feel right.
Is there any other way to completely prevent any kind of flora from growing even with abundance of water sources?










share|improve this question







New contributor




user57841 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











As title, what condition could prevent plant growth from below a planet surface?
I've considered considered removing all water from the planet, both underground and above the surface, but that doesn't feel right.
Is there any other way to completely prevent any kind of flora from growing even with abundance of water sources?







planets worldbuilding-process landscaping






share|improve this question







New contributor




user57841 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




user57841 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




user57841 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 6 hours ago









user57841

161




161




New contributor




user57841 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user57841 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user57841 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Either an absence of nutrients or trace elements or the presence of plant toxins.
    – a4android
    5 hours ago










  • Ecologists ran amok and scrubbed all carbon dioxide from the atmosphere? A future Elon Musk switched to lithium iron phosphate batteries and used up all the phosphorus? Global cooling froze all water? A careless alien janitor spilled a large amount of herbicide? A stupid industrial accident released a large amount of oxygen in the atmosphere?
    – AlexP
    4 hours ago










  • Not sure it's possible. Unless you have multiple conditions. I first thought of high levels of salt in the soil, but some plants thrive in the ocean or on its edges.
    – Cyn
    2 hours ago










  • Nothing! Life always finds a way, that is the whole point of evolution. Your best bet would be to not have life evolve in the first place.
    – nzaman
    50 mins ago










  • "No plant growth at all" means that the only possible life is simple chemosynthesizing microbes.
    – RonJohn
    49 mins ago


















  • Either an absence of nutrients or trace elements or the presence of plant toxins.
    – a4android
    5 hours ago










  • Ecologists ran amok and scrubbed all carbon dioxide from the atmosphere? A future Elon Musk switched to lithium iron phosphate batteries and used up all the phosphorus? Global cooling froze all water? A careless alien janitor spilled a large amount of herbicide? A stupid industrial accident released a large amount of oxygen in the atmosphere?
    – AlexP
    4 hours ago










  • Not sure it's possible. Unless you have multiple conditions. I first thought of high levels of salt in the soil, but some plants thrive in the ocean or on its edges.
    – Cyn
    2 hours ago










  • Nothing! Life always finds a way, that is the whole point of evolution. Your best bet would be to not have life evolve in the first place.
    – nzaman
    50 mins ago










  • "No plant growth at all" means that the only possible life is simple chemosynthesizing microbes.
    – RonJohn
    49 mins ago
















Either an absence of nutrients or trace elements or the presence of plant toxins.
– a4android
5 hours ago




Either an absence of nutrients or trace elements or the presence of plant toxins.
– a4android
5 hours ago












Ecologists ran amok and scrubbed all carbon dioxide from the atmosphere? A future Elon Musk switched to lithium iron phosphate batteries and used up all the phosphorus? Global cooling froze all water? A careless alien janitor spilled a large amount of herbicide? A stupid industrial accident released a large amount of oxygen in the atmosphere?
– AlexP
4 hours ago




Ecologists ran amok and scrubbed all carbon dioxide from the atmosphere? A future Elon Musk switched to lithium iron phosphate batteries and used up all the phosphorus? Global cooling froze all water? A careless alien janitor spilled a large amount of herbicide? A stupid industrial accident released a large amount of oxygen in the atmosphere?
– AlexP
4 hours ago












Not sure it's possible. Unless you have multiple conditions. I first thought of high levels of salt in the soil, but some plants thrive in the ocean or on its edges.
– Cyn
2 hours ago




Not sure it's possible. Unless you have multiple conditions. I first thought of high levels of salt in the soil, but some plants thrive in the ocean or on its edges.
– Cyn
2 hours ago












Nothing! Life always finds a way, that is the whole point of evolution. Your best bet would be to not have life evolve in the first place.
– nzaman
50 mins ago




Nothing! Life always finds a way, that is the whole point of evolution. Your best bet would be to not have life evolve in the first place.
– nzaman
50 mins ago












"No plant growth at all" means that the only possible life is simple chemosynthesizing microbes.
– RonJohn
49 mins ago




"No plant growth at all" means that the only possible life is simple chemosynthesizing microbes.
– RonJohn
49 mins ago










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













Given long enough timescales some lifeforms will exploit your limitations and thrive right on those constraints.



Not a solution, but a very efficient species of snails, which eat anything not snail-like, could prevent plans from growing for a long time. They would adapt to eat btw Alexis of plants, and could overcome protective mechanisms that the plants would develop. However, such a system is not perfect, and it would allow for some plans to exist at any given time. Thus the only downside is that the equilibrium is somewhere in the region of "few plants" and "many many snails".






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    Thoughts:




    • Magma, lots of Magma. In essence the "surface" is very thin, perhaps 2-3 metres. There isn't soil, just basalt's and other igneous rocks. The rocks are warm to hot all the time.


    • The planet is solid, no liquid iron belt protecting the planet from radiation. Sure as anything this will kill a planet. Just look at mars.







    share|improve this answer




























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      A simple solution would be to make the soil uninhabitable to organics due to some chemical. If this was intentional, by some advanced species, they could simply place a strong acid or poison in the ground. If this was part of the planet's nature, it could happen by the soil being incredibly acidic, dissolving most organisms before they can develop.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      snuggles08 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.


















      • Chemical can come from the rocks underneath, or from acid rain. Perhaps volcanic activity could add enough chemicals to atmosphere to make rain deadly.
        – Bald Bear
        6 hours ago










      • The problem is that Oxygen is a chemical that threatened life. Now just look at the thing. Similarly nitrite, and nitrates are poisonous and life started devouring them. Even indirect chemical poisoning like lignin (basically wood) was becoming a problem by locking up too much carbon, essentially starving all photosynthesis and you now see life happily eating that too. My point is that poisonous is purely about perspective, and easily overcome. The poison would need to be distributed everywhere, very quickly.
        – Kain0_0
        1 hour ago




















      up vote
      1
      down vote














      As title, what condition could prevent plant growth from below a planet surface?




      Classically plants thrive on a process known as photosynthesis - they use energy from the sun's light in order to convert carbon and water into carbohydrates, and from there they get their energy.



      Also classically the underground is a dark place that gets no sunlight[citation needed]. That should be enough to keep plants from growin in there.






      share|improve this answer

















      • 1




        I think the question is "what (that is below the surface) could prevent plant growth" and not "what is it that could prevent plants from growing while beneath the surface".
        – QWriter
        4 hours ago


















      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Perhaps there isn't enough topsoil to support the growth of new plant life. This was an issue on our own planet after the end of the ice age, as moving glaciers scoured large areas as they melted in areas such as northern Canada, removing the topsoil that had existed there previously. Other examples of topsoil-removing events include high winds, abnormally heavy rainfall, and exposure to intense heat and/or radiation. So long as an event such as this occurs at a regular interval, substantial plant life should be unable to grow.






      share|improve this answer




























        up vote
        0
        down vote













        If the soil contains (for whatever reason) no magnesium, then any life that existed couldn't make chlorophyll as we know it, which means no plants.



        You could also try some kind of other organism that out-competes the plants, like a soil microbe that uses up resources instead of making them available.



        An occasional catastrophic rad-blast would also do the trick.






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        G. B. Robinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.


















          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "579"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          user57841 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f131606%2funderground-condition-preventing-plant-growth-on-a-planet%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes








          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote













          Given long enough timescales some lifeforms will exploit your limitations and thrive right on those constraints.



          Not a solution, but a very efficient species of snails, which eat anything not snail-like, could prevent plans from growing for a long time. They would adapt to eat btw Alexis of plants, and could overcome protective mechanisms that the plants would develop. However, such a system is not perfect, and it would allow for some plans to exist at any given time. Thus the only downside is that the equilibrium is somewhere in the region of "few plants" and "many many snails".






          share|improve this answer

























            up vote
            2
            down vote













            Given long enough timescales some lifeforms will exploit your limitations and thrive right on those constraints.



            Not a solution, but a very efficient species of snails, which eat anything not snail-like, could prevent plans from growing for a long time. They would adapt to eat btw Alexis of plants, and could overcome protective mechanisms that the plants would develop. However, such a system is not perfect, and it would allow for some plans to exist at any given time. Thus the only downside is that the equilibrium is somewhere in the region of "few plants" and "many many snails".






            share|improve this answer























              up vote
              2
              down vote










              up vote
              2
              down vote









              Given long enough timescales some lifeforms will exploit your limitations and thrive right on those constraints.



              Not a solution, but a very efficient species of snails, which eat anything not snail-like, could prevent plans from growing for a long time. They would adapt to eat btw Alexis of plants, and could overcome protective mechanisms that the plants would develop. However, such a system is not perfect, and it would allow for some plans to exist at any given time. Thus the only downside is that the equilibrium is somewhere in the region of "few plants" and "many many snails".






              share|improve this answer












              Given long enough timescales some lifeforms will exploit your limitations and thrive right on those constraints.



              Not a solution, but a very efficient species of snails, which eat anything not snail-like, could prevent plans from growing for a long time. They would adapt to eat btw Alexis of plants, and could overcome protective mechanisms that the plants would develop. However, such a system is not perfect, and it would allow for some plans to exist at any given time. Thus the only downside is that the equilibrium is somewhere in the region of "few plants" and "many many snails".







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 6 hours ago









              NofP

              2,483420




              2,483420






















                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote













                  Thoughts:




                  • Magma, lots of Magma. In essence the "surface" is very thin, perhaps 2-3 metres. There isn't soil, just basalt's and other igneous rocks. The rocks are warm to hot all the time.


                  • The planet is solid, no liquid iron belt protecting the planet from radiation. Sure as anything this will kill a planet. Just look at mars.







                  share|improve this answer

























                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote













                    Thoughts:




                    • Magma, lots of Magma. In essence the "surface" is very thin, perhaps 2-3 metres. There isn't soil, just basalt's and other igneous rocks. The rocks are warm to hot all the time.


                    • The planet is solid, no liquid iron belt protecting the planet from radiation. Sure as anything this will kill a planet. Just look at mars.







                    share|improve this answer























                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote









                      Thoughts:




                      • Magma, lots of Magma. In essence the "surface" is very thin, perhaps 2-3 metres. There isn't soil, just basalt's and other igneous rocks. The rocks are warm to hot all the time.


                      • The planet is solid, no liquid iron belt protecting the planet from radiation. Sure as anything this will kill a planet. Just look at mars.







                      share|improve this answer












                      Thoughts:




                      • Magma, lots of Magma. In essence the "surface" is very thin, perhaps 2-3 metres. There isn't soil, just basalt's and other igneous rocks. The rocks are warm to hot all the time.


                      • The planet is solid, no liquid iron belt protecting the planet from radiation. Sure as anything this will kill a planet. Just look at mars.








                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 1 hour ago









                      Kain0_0

                      5124




                      5124






















                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          A simple solution would be to make the soil uninhabitable to organics due to some chemical. If this was intentional, by some advanced species, they could simply place a strong acid or poison in the ground. If this was part of the planet's nature, it could happen by the soil being incredibly acidic, dissolving most organisms before they can develop.






                          share|improve this answer








                          New contributor




                          snuggles08 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.


















                          • Chemical can come from the rocks underneath, or from acid rain. Perhaps volcanic activity could add enough chemicals to atmosphere to make rain deadly.
                            – Bald Bear
                            6 hours ago










                          • The problem is that Oxygen is a chemical that threatened life. Now just look at the thing. Similarly nitrite, and nitrates are poisonous and life started devouring them. Even indirect chemical poisoning like lignin (basically wood) was becoming a problem by locking up too much carbon, essentially starving all photosynthesis and you now see life happily eating that too. My point is that poisonous is purely about perspective, and easily overcome. The poison would need to be distributed everywhere, very quickly.
                            – Kain0_0
                            1 hour ago

















                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          A simple solution would be to make the soil uninhabitable to organics due to some chemical. If this was intentional, by some advanced species, they could simply place a strong acid or poison in the ground. If this was part of the planet's nature, it could happen by the soil being incredibly acidic, dissolving most organisms before they can develop.






                          share|improve this answer








                          New contributor




                          snuggles08 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.


















                          • Chemical can come from the rocks underneath, or from acid rain. Perhaps volcanic activity could add enough chemicals to atmosphere to make rain deadly.
                            – Bald Bear
                            6 hours ago










                          • The problem is that Oxygen is a chemical that threatened life. Now just look at the thing. Similarly nitrite, and nitrates are poisonous and life started devouring them. Even indirect chemical poisoning like lignin (basically wood) was becoming a problem by locking up too much carbon, essentially starving all photosynthesis and you now see life happily eating that too. My point is that poisonous is purely about perspective, and easily overcome. The poison would need to be distributed everywhere, very quickly.
                            – Kain0_0
                            1 hour ago















                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote









                          A simple solution would be to make the soil uninhabitable to organics due to some chemical. If this was intentional, by some advanced species, they could simply place a strong acid or poison in the ground. If this was part of the planet's nature, it could happen by the soil being incredibly acidic, dissolving most organisms before they can develop.






                          share|improve this answer








                          New contributor




                          snuggles08 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.









                          A simple solution would be to make the soil uninhabitable to organics due to some chemical. If this was intentional, by some advanced species, they could simply place a strong acid or poison in the ground. If this was part of the planet's nature, it could happen by the soil being incredibly acidic, dissolving most organisms before they can develop.







                          share|improve this answer








                          New contributor




                          snuggles08 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.









                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer






                          New contributor




                          snuggles08 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.









                          answered 6 hours ago









                          snuggles08

                          213




                          213




                          New contributor




                          snuggles08 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.





                          New contributor





                          snuggles08 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.






                          snuggles08 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.












                          • Chemical can come from the rocks underneath, or from acid rain. Perhaps volcanic activity could add enough chemicals to atmosphere to make rain deadly.
                            – Bald Bear
                            6 hours ago










                          • The problem is that Oxygen is a chemical that threatened life. Now just look at the thing. Similarly nitrite, and nitrates are poisonous and life started devouring them. Even indirect chemical poisoning like lignin (basically wood) was becoming a problem by locking up too much carbon, essentially starving all photosynthesis and you now see life happily eating that too. My point is that poisonous is purely about perspective, and easily overcome. The poison would need to be distributed everywhere, very quickly.
                            – Kain0_0
                            1 hour ago




















                          • Chemical can come from the rocks underneath, or from acid rain. Perhaps volcanic activity could add enough chemicals to atmosphere to make rain deadly.
                            – Bald Bear
                            6 hours ago










                          • The problem is that Oxygen is a chemical that threatened life. Now just look at the thing. Similarly nitrite, and nitrates are poisonous and life started devouring them. Even indirect chemical poisoning like lignin (basically wood) was becoming a problem by locking up too much carbon, essentially starving all photosynthesis and you now see life happily eating that too. My point is that poisonous is purely about perspective, and easily overcome. The poison would need to be distributed everywhere, very quickly.
                            – Kain0_0
                            1 hour ago


















                          Chemical can come from the rocks underneath, or from acid rain. Perhaps volcanic activity could add enough chemicals to atmosphere to make rain deadly.
                          – Bald Bear
                          6 hours ago




                          Chemical can come from the rocks underneath, or from acid rain. Perhaps volcanic activity could add enough chemicals to atmosphere to make rain deadly.
                          – Bald Bear
                          6 hours ago












                          The problem is that Oxygen is a chemical that threatened life. Now just look at the thing. Similarly nitrite, and nitrates are poisonous and life started devouring them. Even indirect chemical poisoning like lignin (basically wood) was becoming a problem by locking up too much carbon, essentially starving all photosynthesis and you now see life happily eating that too. My point is that poisonous is purely about perspective, and easily overcome. The poison would need to be distributed everywhere, very quickly.
                          – Kain0_0
                          1 hour ago






                          The problem is that Oxygen is a chemical that threatened life. Now just look at the thing. Similarly nitrite, and nitrates are poisonous and life started devouring them. Even indirect chemical poisoning like lignin (basically wood) was becoming a problem by locking up too much carbon, essentially starving all photosynthesis and you now see life happily eating that too. My point is that poisonous is purely about perspective, and easily overcome. The poison would need to be distributed everywhere, very quickly.
                          – Kain0_0
                          1 hour ago












                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote














                          As title, what condition could prevent plant growth from below a planet surface?




                          Classically plants thrive on a process known as photosynthesis - they use energy from the sun's light in order to convert carbon and water into carbohydrates, and from there they get their energy.



                          Also classically the underground is a dark place that gets no sunlight[citation needed]. That should be enough to keep plants from growin in there.






                          share|improve this answer

















                          • 1




                            I think the question is "what (that is below the surface) could prevent plant growth" and not "what is it that could prevent plants from growing while beneath the surface".
                            – QWriter
                            4 hours ago















                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote














                          As title, what condition could prevent plant growth from below a planet surface?




                          Classically plants thrive on a process known as photosynthesis - they use energy from the sun's light in order to convert carbon and water into carbohydrates, and from there they get their energy.



                          Also classically the underground is a dark place that gets no sunlight[citation needed]. That should be enough to keep plants from growin in there.






                          share|improve this answer

















                          • 1




                            I think the question is "what (that is below the surface) could prevent plant growth" and not "what is it that could prevent plants from growing while beneath the surface".
                            – QWriter
                            4 hours ago













                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote










                          As title, what condition could prevent plant growth from below a planet surface?




                          Classically plants thrive on a process known as photosynthesis - they use energy from the sun's light in order to convert carbon and water into carbohydrates, and from there they get their energy.



                          Also classically the underground is a dark place that gets no sunlight[citation needed]. That should be enough to keep plants from growin in there.






                          share|improve this answer













                          As title, what condition could prevent plant growth from below a planet surface?




                          Classically plants thrive on a process known as photosynthesis - they use energy from the sun's light in order to convert carbon and water into carbohydrates, and from there they get their energy.



                          Also classically the underground is a dark place that gets no sunlight[citation needed]. That should be enough to keep plants from growin in there.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 5 hours ago









                          Renan

                          40.5k1193205




                          40.5k1193205








                          • 1




                            I think the question is "what (that is below the surface) could prevent plant growth" and not "what is it that could prevent plants from growing while beneath the surface".
                            – QWriter
                            4 hours ago














                          • 1




                            I think the question is "what (that is below the surface) could prevent plant growth" and not "what is it that could prevent plants from growing while beneath the surface".
                            – QWriter
                            4 hours ago








                          1




                          1




                          I think the question is "what (that is below the surface) could prevent plant growth" and not "what is it that could prevent plants from growing while beneath the surface".
                          – QWriter
                          4 hours ago




                          I think the question is "what (that is below the surface) could prevent plant growth" and not "what is it that could prevent plants from growing while beneath the surface".
                          – QWriter
                          4 hours ago










                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote













                          Perhaps there isn't enough topsoil to support the growth of new plant life. This was an issue on our own planet after the end of the ice age, as moving glaciers scoured large areas as they melted in areas such as northern Canada, removing the topsoil that had existed there previously. Other examples of topsoil-removing events include high winds, abnormally heavy rainfall, and exposure to intense heat and/or radiation. So long as an event such as this occurs at a regular interval, substantial plant life should be unable to grow.






                          share|improve this answer

























                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote













                            Perhaps there isn't enough topsoil to support the growth of new plant life. This was an issue on our own planet after the end of the ice age, as moving glaciers scoured large areas as they melted in areas such as northern Canada, removing the topsoil that had existed there previously. Other examples of topsoil-removing events include high winds, abnormally heavy rainfall, and exposure to intense heat and/or radiation. So long as an event such as this occurs at a regular interval, substantial plant life should be unable to grow.






                            share|improve this answer























                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote










                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote









                              Perhaps there isn't enough topsoil to support the growth of new plant life. This was an issue on our own planet after the end of the ice age, as moving glaciers scoured large areas as they melted in areas such as northern Canada, removing the topsoil that had existed there previously. Other examples of topsoil-removing events include high winds, abnormally heavy rainfall, and exposure to intense heat and/or radiation. So long as an event such as this occurs at a regular interval, substantial plant life should be unable to grow.






                              share|improve this answer












                              Perhaps there isn't enough topsoil to support the growth of new plant life. This was an issue on our own planet after the end of the ice age, as moving glaciers scoured large areas as they melted in areas such as northern Canada, removing the topsoil that had existed there previously. Other examples of topsoil-removing events include high winds, abnormally heavy rainfall, and exposure to intense heat and/or radiation. So long as an event such as this occurs at a regular interval, substantial plant life should be unable to grow.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered 6 hours ago









                              Bewilderer

                              4689




                              4689






















                                  up vote
                                  0
                                  down vote













                                  If the soil contains (for whatever reason) no magnesium, then any life that existed couldn't make chlorophyll as we know it, which means no plants.



                                  You could also try some kind of other organism that out-competes the plants, like a soil microbe that uses up resources instead of making them available.



                                  An occasional catastrophic rad-blast would also do the trick.






                                  share|improve this answer








                                  New contributor




                                  G. B. Robinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote













                                    If the soil contains (for whatever reason) no magnesium, then any life that existed couldn't make chlorophyll as we know it, which means no plants.



                                    You could also try some kind of other organism that out-competes the plants, like a soil microbe that uses up resources instead of making them available.



                                    An occasional catastrophic rad-blast would also do the trick.






                                    share|improve this answer








                                    New contributor




                                    G. B. Robinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                                      up vote
                                      0
                                      down vote










                                      up vote
                                      0
                                      down vote









                                      If the soil contains (for whatever reason) no magnesium, then any life that existed couldn't make chlorophyll as we know it, which means no plants.



                                      You could also try some kind of other organism that out-competes the plants, like a soil microbe that uses up resources instead of making them available.



                                      An occasional catastrophic rad-blast would also do the trick.






                                      share|improve this answer








                                      New contributor




                                      G. B. Robinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                      If the soil contains (for whatever reason) no magnesium, then any life that existed couldn't make chlorophyll as we know it, which means no plants.



                                      You could also try some kind of other organism that out-competes the plants, like a soil microbe that uses up resources instead of making them available.



                                      An occasional catastrophic rad-blast would also do the trick.







                                      share|improve this answer








                                      New contributor




                                      G. B. Robinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer






                                      New contributor




                                      G. B. Robinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                      answered 1 hour ago









                                      G. B. Robinson

                                      11




                                      11




                                      New contributor




                                      G. B. Robinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                      New contributor





                                      G. B. Robinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                      G. B. Robinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                                          user57841 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded


















                                          user57841 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                          user57841 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                          user57841 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f131606%2funderground-condition-preventing-plant-growth-on-a-planet%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Bundesstraße 106

                                          Verónica Boquete

                                          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten