Index (or signature) of a pseudo-riemannian metric on manifold
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $(M , g)$ a $n$-dimensional pseudo-riemannian manifold. As $g(p)$ is a bilinear mapping from $T_pM times T_pM$ to $mathbb{R}$, we can get a basis
$$
{left{{left(frac{partial}{partial x_i}right)}_pright}}_{i = 1}^n
$$
on $T_pM$ such that
$$
g(p)left({left(frac{partial}{partial x_i}right)}_p , {left(frac{partial}{partial x_j}right)}_pright) = 0
$$
for each $i , j in {1 , ldots , n}$ such that $i neq j$. It allows us to define the index (or signature) of $g(p)$ because it is independent of the choice of basis in $T_pM$, a fact known classically as Sylvester's law of inertia.
Well, many texts talk about index of $g$ strightly, and define for instance riemannian metrics as pseudo-riemannian metrics which index coincide with the dimension of the manifold (or signature ($n , 0$) in this case).
How can I show that it is independent of the point $p$ in $M$? As it can be observed, I have not used neither $g(p)$ is non-degenerate or symetric nor the fact $T_pM cong {mathbb{R}}^n cong T_qM$, as isomorphism of vector spaces ($p , q in M$), for defining signature of $g(p)$ (for $p in M$ fixed). Must I use one of these statements to show that the index of $g(p)$ and $g(q)$ coincide for each $p , q in M$?
semi-riemannian-geometry
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $(M , g)$ a $n$-dimensional pseudo-riemannian manifold. As $g(p)$ is a bilinear mapping from $T_pM times T_pM$ to $mathbb{R}$, we can get a basis
$$
{left{{left(frac{partial}{partial x_i}right)}_pright}}_{i = 1}^n
$$
on $T_pM$ such that
$$
g(p)left({left(frac{partial}{partial x_i}right)}_p , {left(frac{partial}{partial x_j}right)}_pright) = 0
$$
for each $i , j in {1 , ldots , n}$ such that $i neq j$. It allows us to define the index (or signature) of $g(p)$ because it is independent of the choice of basis in $T_pM$, a fact known classically as Sylvester's law of inertia.
Well, many texts talk about index of $g$ strightly, and define for instance riemannian metrics as pseudo-riemannian metrics which index coincide with the dimension of the manifold (or signature ($n , 0$) in this case).
How can I show that it is independent of the point $p$ in $M$? As it can be observed, I have not used neither $g(p)$ is non-degenerate or symetric nor the fact $T_pM cong {mathbb{R}}^n cong T_qM$, as isomorphism of vector spaces ($p , q in M$), for defining signature of $g(p)$ (for $p in M$ fixed). Must I use one of these statements to show that the index of $g(p)$ and $g(q)$ coincide for each $p , q in M$?
semi-riemannian-geometry
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $(M , g)$ a $n$-dimensional pseudo-riemannian manifold. As $g(p)$ is a bilinear mapping from $T_pM times T_pM$ to $mathbb{R}$, we can get a basis
$$
{left{{left(frac{partial}{partial x_i}right)}_pright}}_{i = 1}^n
$$
on $T_pM$ such that
$$
g(p)left({left(frac{partial}{partial x_i}right)}_p , {left(frac{partial}{partial x_j}right)}_pright) = 0
$$
for each $i , j in {1 , ldots , n}$ such that $i neq j$. It allows us to define the index (or signature) of $g(p)$ because it is independent of the choice of basis in $T_pM$, a fact known classically as Sylvester's law of inertia.
Well, many texts talk about index of $g$ strightly, and define for instance riemannian metrics as pseudo-riemannian metrics which index coincide with the dimension of the manifold (or signature ($n , 0$) in this case).
How can I show that it is independent of the point $p$ in $M$? As it can be observed, I have not used neither $g(p)$ is non-degenerate or symetric nor the fact $T_pM cong {mathbb{R}}^n cong T_qM$, as isomorphism of vector spaces ($p , q in M$), for defining signature of $g(p)$ (for $p in M$ fixed). Must I use one of these statements to show that the index of $g(p)$ and $g(q)$ coincide for each $p , q in M$?
semi-riemannian-geometry
Let $(M , g)$ a $n$-dimensional pseudo-riemannian manifold. As $g(p)$ is a bilinear mapping from $T_pM times T_pM$ to $mathbb{R}$, we can get a basis
$$
{left{{left(frac{partial}{partial x_i}right)}_pright}}_{i = 1}^n
$$
on $T_pM$ such that
$$
g(p)left({left(frac{partial}{partial x_i}right)}_p , {left(frac{partial}{partial x_j}right)}_pright) = 0
$$
for each $i , j in {1 , ldots , n}$ such that $i neq j$. It allows us to define the index (or signature) of $g(p)$ because it is independent of the choice of basis in $T_pM$, a fact known classically as Sylvester's law of inertia.
Well, many texts talk about index of $g$ strightly, and define for instance riemannian metrics as pseudo-riemannian metrics which index coincide with the dimension of the manifold (or signature ($n , 0$) in this case).
How can I show that it is independent of the point $p$ in $M$? As it can be observed, I have not used neither $g(p)$ is non-degenerate or symetric nor the fact $T_pM cong {mathbb{R}}^n cong T_qM$, as isomorphism of vector spaces ($p , q in M$), for defining signature of $g(p)$ (for $p in M$ fixed). Must I use one of these statements to show that the index of $g(p)$ and $g(q)$ coincide for each $p , q in M$?
semi-riemannian-geometry
semi-riemannian-geometry
asked Nov 19 at 15:49
joseabp91
1,235411
1,235411
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Let $v_1, dots, v_n$ be a basis for $T_pM$ such that $g(p)(v_i, v_i) > 0$ for $i = 1, dots, k$, and $g(p)(v_i, v_i) < 0$ for $i = k + 1, dots, n$. We can extend this basis to a basis of local smooth vector fields $V_1, dots, V_n$ for $TM|_U$ where $U$ is an open subset of $p$.
Now consider the functions $f_i : U to mathbb{R}$ given by $f_i(q) = g(q)(V_i|_q, V_i|_q)$. Note that $f_i$ is smooth and $f_i(p) = g(p)(V_i|_p, V_i|_p) = g(p)(v_i, v_i)$ which has a sign. For $i = 1, dots, k$, let $U_i = f^{-1}((0, infty))$ and for $i = k + 1, dots, n$ let $U_i = f^{-1}((-infty, 0))$. Then on $U' = U_1capdotscap U_kcap U_{k+1}capdotscap U_n$ each $f_i$ has a sign. For any $q in U'$, $f_i(q) > 0$ for $i = 1, dots, k$ and $f_i(q) < 0$ for $i = k + 1, dots, n$, so $g(q)$ has the same index of $g(p)$. That is, the index of $g$ is a locally constant integer-valued function and is therefore constant on each connected component of $M$.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Let $v_1, dots, v_n$ be a basis for $T_pM$ such that $g(p)(v_i, v_i) > 0$ for $i = 1, dots, k$, and $g(p)(v_i, v_i) < 0$ for $i = k + 1, dots, n$. We can extend this basis to a basis of local smooth vector fields $V_1, dots, V_n$ for $TM|_U$ where $U$ is an open subset of $p$.
Now consider the functions $f_i : U to mathbb{R}$ given by $f_i(q) = g(q)(V_i|_q, V_i|_q)$. Note that $f_i$ is smooth and $f_i(p) = g(p)(V_i|_p, V_i|_p) = g(p)(v_i, v_i)$ which has a sign. For $i = 1, dots, k$, let $U_i = f^{-1}((0, infty))$ and for $i = k + 1, dots, n$ let $U_i = f^{-1}((-infty, 0))$. Then on $U' = U_1capdotscap U_kcap U_{k+1}capdotscap U_n$ each $f_i$ has a sign. For any $q in U'$, $f_i(q) > 0$ for $i = 1, dots, k$ and $f_i(q) < 0$ for $i = k + 1, dots, n$, so $g(q)$ has the same index of $g(p)$. That is, the index of $g$ is a locally constant integer-valued function and is therefore constant on each connected component of $M$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Let $v_1, dots, v_n$ be a basis for $T_pM$ such that $g(p)(v_i, v_i) > 0$ for $i = 1, dots, k$, and $g(p)(v_i, v_i) < 0$ for $i = k + 1, dots, n$. We can extend this basis to a basis of local smooth vector fields $V_1, dots, V_n$ for $TM|_U$ where $U$ is an open subset of $p$.
Now consider the functions $f_i : U to mathbb{R}$ given by $f_i(q) = g(q)(V_i|_q, V_i|_q)$. Note that $f_i$ is smooth and $f_i(p) = g(p)(V_i|_p, V_i|_p) = g(p)(v_i, v_i)$ which has a sign. For $i = 1, dots, k$, let $U_i = f^{-1}((0, infty))$ and for $i = k + 1, dots, n$ let $U_i = f^{-1}((-infty, 0))$. Then on $U' = U_1capdotscap U_kcap U_{k+1}capdotscap U_n$ each $f_i$ has a sign. For any $q in U'$, $f_i(q) > 0$ for $i = 1, dots, k$ and $f_i(q) < 0$ for $i = k + 1, dots, n$, so $g(q)$ has the same index of $g(p)$. That is, the index of $g$ is a locally constant integer-valued function and is therefore constant on each connected component of $M$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Let $v_1, dots, v_n$ be a basis for $T_pM$ such that $g(p)(v_i, v_i) > 0$ for $i = 1, dots, k$, and $g(p)(v_i, v_i) < 0$ for $i = k + 1, dots, n$. We can extend this basis to a basis of local smooth vector fields $V_1, dots, V_n$ for $TM|_U$ where $U$ is an open subset of $p$.
Now consider the functions $f_i : U to mathbb{R}$ given by $f_i(q) = g(q)(V_i|_q, V_i|_q)$. Note that $f_i$ is smooth and $f_i(p) = g(p)(V_i|_p, V_i|_p) = g(p)(v_i, v_i)$ which has a sign. For $i = 1, dots, k$, let $U_i = f^{-1}((0, infty))$ and for $i = k + 1, dots, n$ let $U_i = f^{-1}((-infty, 0))$. Then on $U' = U_1capdotscap U_kcap U_{k+1}capdotscap U_n$ each $f_i$ has a sign. For any $q in U'$, $f_i(q) > 0$ for $i = 1, dots, k$ and $f_i(q) < 0$ for $i = k + 1, dots, n$, so $g(q)$ has the same index of $g(p)$. That is, the index of $g$ is a locally constant integer-valued function and is therefore constant on each connected component of $M$.
Let $v_1, dots, v_n$ be a basis for $T_pM$ such that $g(p)(v_i, v_i) > 0$ for $i = 1, dots, k$, and $g(p)(v_i, v_i) < 0$ for $i = k + 1, dots, n$. We can extend this basis to a basis of local smooth vector fields $V_1, dots, V_n$ for $TM|_U$ where $U$ is an open subset of $p$.
Now consider the functions $f_i : U to mathbb{R}$ given by $f_i(q) = g(q)(V_i|_q, V_i|_q)$. Note that $f_i$ is smooth and $f_i(p) = g(p)(V_i|_p, V_i|_p) = g(p)(v_i, v_i)$ which has a sign. For $i = 1, dots, k$, let $U_i = f^{-1}((0, infty))$ and for $i = k + 1, dots, n$ let $U_i = f^{-1}((-infty, 0))$. Then on $U' = U_1capdotscap U_kcap U_{k+1}capdotscap U_n$ each $f_i$ has a sign. For any $q in U'$, $f_i(q) > 0$ for $i = 1, dots, k$ and $f_i(q) < 0$ for $i = k + 1, dots, n$, so $g(q)$ has the same index of $g(p)$. That is, the index of $g$ is a locally constant integer-valued function and is therefore constant on each connected component of $M$.
answered Nov 19 at 18:50
Michael Albanese
62.6k1598300
62.6k1598300
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005092%2findex-or-signature-of-a-pseudo-riemannian-metric-on-manifold%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown