Index (or signature) of a pseudo-riemannian metric on manifold











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $(M , g)$ a $n$-dimensional pseudo-riemannian manifold. As $g(p)$ is a bilinear mapping from $T_pM times T_pM$ to $mathbb{R}$, we can get a basis
$$
{left{{left(frac{partial}{partial x_i}right)}_pright}}_{i = 1}^n
$$

on $T_pM$ such that
$$
g(p)left({left(frac{partial}{partial x_i}right)}_p , {left(frac{partial}{partial x_j}right)}_pright) = 0
$$

for each $i , j in {1 , ldots , n}$ such that $i neq j$. It allows us to define the index (or signature) of $g(p)$ because it is independent of the choice of basis in $T_pM$, a fact known classically as Sylvester's law of inertia.



Well, many texts talk about index of $g$ strightly, and define for instance riemannian metrics as pseudo-riemannian metrics which index coincide with the dimension of the manifold (or signature ($n , 0$) in this case).



How can I show that it is independent of the point $p$ in $M$? As it can be observed, I have not used neither $g(p)$ is non-degenerate or symetric nor the fact $T_pM cong {mathbb{R}}^n cong T_qM$, as isomorphism of vector spaces ($p , q in M$), for defining signature of $g(p)$ (for $p in M$ fixed). Must I use one of these statements to show that the index of $g(p)$ and $g(q)$ coincide for each $p , q in M$?










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $(M , g)$ a $n$-dimensional pseudo-riemannian manifold. As $g(p)$ is a bilinear mapping from $T_pM times T_pM$ to $mathbb{R}$, we can get a basis
    $$
    {left{{left(frac{partial}{partial x_i}right)}_pright}}_{i = 1}^n
    $$

    on $T_pM$ such that
    $$
    g(p)left({left(frac{partial}{partial x_i}right)}_p , {left(frac{partial}{partial x_j}right)}_pright) = 0
    $$

    for each $i , j in {1 , ldots , n}$ such that $i neq j$. It allows us to define the index (or signature) of $g(p)$ because it is independent of the choice of basis in $T_pM$, a fact known classically as Sylvester's law of inertia.



    Well, many texts talk about index of $g$ strightly, and define for instance riemannian metrics as pseudo-riemannian metrics which index coincide with the dimension of the manifold (or signature ($n , 0$) in this case).



    How can I show that it is independent of the point $p$ in $M$? As it can be observed, I have not used neither $g(p)$ is non-degenerate or symetric nor the fact $T_pM cong {mathbb{R}}^n cong T_qM$, as isomorphism of vector spaces ($p , q in M$), for defining signature of $g(p)$ (for $p in M$ fixed). Must I use one of these statements to show that the index of $g(p)$ and $g(q)$ coincide for each $p , q in M$?










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $(M , g)$ a $n$-dimensional pseudo-riemannian manifold. As $g(p)$ is a bilinear mapping from $T_pM times T_pM$ to $mathbb{R}$, we can get a basis
      $$
      {left{{left(frac{partial}{partial x_i}right)}_pright}}_{i = 1}^n
      $$

      on $T_pM$ such that
      $$
      g(p)left({left(frac{partial}{partial x_i}right)}_p , {left(frac{partial}{partial x_j}right)}_pright) = 0
      $$

      for each $i , j in {1 , ldots , n}$ such that $i neq j$. It allows us to define the index (or signature) of $g(p)$ because it is independent of the choice of basis in $T_pM$, a fact known classically as Sylvester's law of inertia.



      Well, many texts talk about index of $g$ strightly, and define for instance riemannian metrics as pseudo-riemannian metrics which index coincide with the dimension of the manifold (or signature ($n , 0$) in this case).



      How can I show that it is independent of the point $p$ in $M$? As it can be observed, I have not used neither $g(p)$ is non-degenerate or symetric nor the fact $T_pM cong {mathbb{R}}^n cong T_qM$, as isomorphism of vector spaces ($p , q in M$), for defining signature of $g(p)$ (for $p in M$ fixed). Must I use one of these statements to show that the index of $g(p)$ and $g(q)$ coincide for each $p , q in M$?










      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $(M , g)$ a $n$-dimensional pseudo-riemannian manifold. As $g(p)$ is a bilinear mapping from $T_pM times T_pM$ to $mathbb{R}$, we can get a basis
      $$
      {left{{left(frac{partial}{partial x_i}right)}_pright}}_{i = 1}^n
      $$

      on $T_pM$ such that
      $$
      g(p)left({left(frac{partial}{partial x_i}right)}_p , {left(frac{partial}{partial x_j}right)}_pright) = 0
      $$

      for each $i , j in {1 , ldots , n}$ such that $i neq j$. It allows us to define the index (or signature) of $g(p)$ because it is independent of the choice of basis in $T_pM$, a fact known classically as Sylvester's law of inertia.



      Well, many texts talk about index of $g$ strightly, and define for instance riemannian metrics as pseudo-riemannian metrics which index coincide with the dimension of the manifold (or signature ($n , 0$) in this case).



      How can I show that it is independent of the point $p$ in $M$? As it can be observed, I have not used neither $g(p)$ is non-degenerate or symetric nor the fact $T_pM cong {mathbb{R}}^n cong T_qM$, as isomorphism of vector spaces ($p , q in M$), for defining signature of $g(p)$ (for $p in M$ fixed). Must I use one of these statements to show that the index of $g(p)$ and $g(q)$ coincide for each $p , q in M$?







      semi-riemannian-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 19 at 15:49









      joseabp91

      1,235411




      1,235411






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Let $v_1, dots, v_n$ be a basis for $T_pM$ such that $g(p)(v_i, v_i) > 0$ for $i = 1, dots, k$, and $g(p)(v_i, v_i) < 0$ for $i = k + 1, dots, n$. We can extend this basis to a basis of local smooth vector fields $V_1, dots, V_n$ for $TM|_U$ where $U$ is an open subset of $p$.



          Now consider the functions $f_i : U to mathbb{R}$ given by $f_i(q) = g(q)(V_i|_q, V_i|_q)$. Note that $f_i$ is smooth and $f_i(p) = g(p)(V_i|_p, V_i|_p) = g(p)(v_i, v_i)$ which has a sign. For $i = 1, dots, k$, let $U_i = f^{-1}((0, infty))$ and for $i = k + 1, dots, n$ let $U_i = f^{-1}((-infty, 0))$. Then on $U' = U_1capdotscap U_kcap U_{k+1}capdotscap U_n$ each $f_i$ has a sign. For any $q in U'$, $f_i(q) > 0$ for $i = 1, dots, k$ and $f_i(q) < 0$ for $i = k + 1, dots, n$, so $g(q)$ has the same index of $g(p)$. That is, the index of $g$ is a locally constant integer-valued function and is therefore constant on each connected component of $M$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005092%2findex-or-signature-of-a-pseudo-riemannian-metric-on-manifold%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            Let $v_1, dots, v_n$ be a basis for $T_pM$ such that $g(p)(v_i, v_i) > 0$ for $i = 1, dots, k$, and $g(p)(v_i, v_i) < 0$ for $i = k + 1, dots, n$. We can extend this basis to a basis of local smooth vector fields $V_1, dots, V_n$ for $TM|_U$ where $U$ is an open subset of $p$.



            Now consider the functions $f_i : U to mathbb{R}$ given by $f_i(q) = g(q)(V_i|_q, V_i|_q)$. Note that $f_i$ is smooth and $f_i(p) = g(p)(V_i|_p, V_i|_p) = g(p)(v_i, v_i)$ which has a sign. For $i = 1, dots, k$, let $U_i = f^{-1}((0, infty))$ and for $i = k + 1, dots, n$ let $U_i = f^{-1}((-infty, 0))$. Then on $U' = U_1capdotscap U_kcap U_{k+1}capdotscap U_n$ each $f_i$ has a sign. For any $q in U'$, $f_i(q) > 0$ for $i = 1, dots, k$ and $f_i(q) < 0$ for $i = k + 1, dots, n$, so $g(q)$ has the same index of $g(p)$. That is, the index of $g$ is a locally constant integer-valued function and is therefore constant on each connected component of $M$.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              1
              down vote



              accepted










              Let $v_1, dots, v_n$ be a basis for $T_pM$ such that $g(p)(v_i, v_i) > 0$ for $i = 1, dots, k$, and $g(p)(v_i, v_i) < 0$ for $i = k + 1, dots, n$. We can extend this basis to a basis of local smooth vector fields $V_1, dots, V_n$ for $TM|_U$ where $U$ is an open subset of $p$.



              Now consider the functions $f_i : U to mathbb{R}$ given by $f_i(q) = g(q)(V_i|_q, V_i|_q)$. Note that $f_i$ is smooth and $f_i(p) = g(p)(V_i|_p, V_i|_p) = g(p)(v_i, v_i)$ which has a sign. For $i = 1, dots, k$, let $U_i = f^{-1}((0, infty))$ and for $i = k + 1, dots, n$ let $U_i = f^{-1}((-infty, 0))$. Then on $U' = U_1capdotscap U_kcap U_{k+1}capdotscap U_n$ each $f_i$ has a sign. For any $q in U'$, $f_i(q) > 0$ for $i = 1, dots, k$ and $f_i(q) < 0$ for $i = k + 1, dots, n$, so $g(q)$ has the same index of $g(p)$. That is, the index of $g$ is a locally constant integer-valued function and is therefore constant on each connected component of $M$.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted






                Let $v_1, dots, v_n$ be a basis for $T_pM$ such that $g(p)(v_i, v_i) > 0$ for $i = 1, dots, k$, and $g(p)(v_i, v_i) < 0$ for $i = k + 1, dots, n$. We can extend this basis to a basis of local smooth vector fields $V_1, dots, V_n$ for $TM|_U$ where $U$ is an open subset of $p$.



                Now consider the functions $f_i : U to mathbb{R}$ given by $f_i(q) = g(q)(V_i|_q, V_i|_q)$. Note that $f_i$ is smooth and $f_i(p) = g(p)(V_i|_p, V_i|_p) = g(p)(v_i, v_i)$ which has a sign. For $i = 1, dots, k$, let $U_i = f^{-1}((0, infty))$ and for $i = k + 1, dots, n$ let $U_i = f^{-1}((-infty, 0))$. Then on $U' = U_1capdotscap U_kcap U_{k+1}capdotscap U_n$ each $f_i$ has a sign. For any $q in U'$, $f_i(q) > 0$ for $i = 1, dots, k$ and $f_i(q) < 0$ for $i = k + 1, dots, n$, so $g(q)$ has the same index of $g(p)$. That is, the index of $g$ is a locally constant integer-valued function and is therefore constant on each connected component of $M$.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Let $v_1, dots, v_n$ be a basis for $T_pM$ such that $g(p)(v_i, v_i) > 0$ for $i = 1, dots, k$, and $g(p)(v_i, v_i) < 0$ for $i = k + 1, dots, n$. We can extend this basis to a basis of local smooth vector fields $V_1, dots, V_n$ for $TM|_U$ where $U$ is an open subset of $p$.



                Now consider the functions $f_i : U to mathbb{R}$ given by $f_i(q) = g(q)(V_i|_q, V_i|_q)$. Note that $f_i$ is smooth and $f_i(p) = g(p)(V_i|_p, V_i|_p) = g(p)(v_i, v_i)$ which has a sign. For $i = 1, dots, k$, let $U_i = f^{-1}((0, infty))$ and for $i = k + 1, dots, n$ let $U_i = f^{-1}((-infty, 0))$. Then on $U' = U_1capdotscap U_kcap U_{k+1}capdotscap U_n$ each $f_i$ has a sign. For any $q in U'$, $f_i(q) > 0$ for $i = 1, dots, k$ and $f_i(q) < 0$ for $i = k + 1, dots, n$, so $g(q)$ has the same index of $g(p)$. That is, the index of $g$ is a locally constant integer-valued function and is therefore constant on each connected component of $M$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 19 at 18:50









                Michael Albanese

                62.6k1598300




                62.6k1598300






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005092%2findex-or-signature-of-a-pseudo-riemannian-metric-on-manifold%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bundesstraße 106

                    Verónica Boquete

                    Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten