Binary operation $xy$, has identity, but not associativity. Is the inverse unique?











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Let $S$ be a set with a binary operation $xy$ defined on it, with a neutral element, but not satisfying associativity. I want to prove that the inverse isn't necessarily unique.



My attempt to answer this is in the answer below.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Presumably, you mean, when an inverse exists? Is the neutral element both a right and left neutral element?
    – Thomas Andrews
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:03










  • @ThomasAndrews Yes, that is the only way I know it so far
    – Makoto K.
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:05















up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Let $S$ be a set with a binary operation $xy$ defined on it, with a neutral element, but not satisfying associativity. I want to prove that the inverse isn't necessarily unique.



My attempt to answer this is in the answer below.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Presumably, you mean, when an inverse exists? Is the neutral element both a right and left neutral element?
    – Thomas Andrews
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:03










  • @ThomasAndrews Yes, that is the only way I know it so far
    – Makoto K.
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:05













up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





Let $S$ be a set with a binary operation $xy$ defined on it, with a neutral element, but not satisfying associativity. I want to prove that the inverse isn't necessarily unique.



My attempt to answer this is in the answer below.










share|cite|improve this question













Let $S$ be a set with a binary operation $xy$ defined on it, with a neutral element, but not satisfying associativity. I want to prove that the inverse isn't necessarily unique.



My attempt to answer this is in the answer below.







abstract-algebra binary-operations






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 16 '15 at 13:00









Makoto K.

292111




292111












  • Presumably, you mean, when an inverse exists? Is the neutral element both a right and left neutral element?
    – Thomas Andrews
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:03










  • @ThomasAndrews Yes, that is the only way I know it so far
    – Makoto K.
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:05


















  • Presumably, you mean, when an inverse exists? Is the neutral element both a right and left neutral element?
    – Thomas Andrews
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:03










  • @ThomasAndrews Yes, that is the only way I know it so far
    – Makoto K.
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:05
















Presumably, you mean, when an inverse exists? Is the neutral element both a right and left neutral element?
– Thomas Andrews
Jan 16 '15 at 13:03




Presumably, you mean, when an inverse exists? Is the neutral element both a right and left neutral element?
– Thomas Andrews
Jan 16 '15 at 13:03












@ThomasAndrews Yes, that is the only way I know it so far
– Makoto K.
Jan 16 '15 at 13:05




@ThomasAndrews Yes, that is the only way I know it so far
– Makoto K.
Jan 16 '15 at 13:05










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










Let $S={1,2,3}$ and define $star$ so that $xstar 1 = 1star x=x$ and $xstar y=1$ if $x,yin{2,3}$. Then $(S,star)$ has a neutral element, $1$, but $2star 3=2star 2=1$, so inverse elements are not unique.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • What is $f$? There is no $f$ here. It is a binary operation on a set with an identity.
    – Thomas Andrews
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:10










  • @MakotoK. No, the map is $Stimes Sto S$ (since it is a binary operation).
    – Tobias Kildetoft
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:12






  • 1




    The point is, if someone asks you whether, "Are all natural numbers even," you don't show that it is impossible to prove, you just say, "$1$ is a natural number and it is not even, so the statement is false."
    – Thomas Andrews
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:12










  • @ThomasAndrews Thank you
    – Makoto K.
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:12






  • 2




    I didn't deliberately make it minimal, I just realized I couldn't do it with two elements, and was looking for something simple.
    – Thomas Andrews
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:27











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1106653%2fbinary-operation-xy-has-identity-but-not-associativity-is-the-inverse-uniqu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
4
down vote



accepted










Let $S={1,2,3}$ and define $star$ so that $xstar 1 = 1star x=x$ and $xstar y=1$ if $x,yin{2,3}$. Then $(S,star)$ has a neutral element, $1$, but $2star 3=2star 2=1$, so inverse elements are not unique.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • What is $f$? There is no $f$ here. It is a binary operation on a set with an identity.
    – Thomas Andrews
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:10










  • @MakotoK. No, the map is $Stimes Sto S$ (since it is a binary operation).
    – Tobias Kildetoft
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:12






  • 1




    The point is, if someone asks you whether, "Are all natural numbers even," you don't show that it is impossible to prove, you just say, "$1$ is a natural number and it is not even, so the statement is false."
    – Thomas Andrews
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:12










  • @ThomasAndrews Thank you
    – Makoto K.
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:12






  • 2




    I didn't deliberately make it minimal, I just realized I couldn't do it with two elements, and was looking for something simple.
    – Thomas Andrews
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:27















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










Let $S={1,2,3}$ and define $star$ so that $xstar 1 = 1star x=x$ and $xstar y=1$ if $x,yin{2,3}$. Then $(S,star)$ has a neutral element, $1$, but $2star 3=2star 2=1$, so inverse elements are not unique.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • What is $f$? There is no $f$ here. It is a binary operation on a set with an identity.
    – Thomas Andrews
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:10










  • @MakotoK. No, the map is $Stimes Sto S$ (since it is a binary operation).
    – Tobias Kildetoft
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:12






  • 1




    The point is, if someone asks you whether, "Are all natural numbers even," you don't show that it is impossible to prove, you just say, "$1$ is a natural number and it is not even, so the statement is false."
    – Thomas Andrews
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:12










  • @ThomasAndrews Thank you
    – Makoto K.
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:12






  • 2




    I didn't deliberately make it minimal, I just realized I couldn't do it with two elements, and was looking for something simple.
    – Thomas Andrews
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:27













up vote
4
down vote



accepted







up vote
4
down vote



accepted






Let $S={1,2,3}$ and define $star$ so that $xstar 1 = 1star x=x$ and $xstar y=1$ if $x,yin{2,3}$. Then $(S,star)$ has a neutral element, $1$, but $2star 3=2star 2=1$, so inverse elements are not unique.






share|cite|improve this answer














Let $S={1,2,3}$ and define $star$ so that $xstar 1 = 1star x=x$ and $xstar y=1$ if $x,yin{2,3}$. Then $(S,star)$ has a neutral element, $1$, but $2star 3=2star 2=1$, so inverse elements are not unique.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 24 at 1:58

























answered Jan 16 '15 at 13:07









Thomas Andrews

129k11145294




129k11145294












  • What is $f$? There is no $f$ here. It is a binary operation on a set with an identity.
    – Thomas Andrews
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:10










  • @MakotoK. No, the map is $Stimes Sto S$ (since it is a binary operation).
    – Tobias Kildetoft
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:12






  • 1




    The point is, if someone asks you whether, "Are all natural numbers even," you don't show that it is impossible to prove, you just say, "$1$ is a natural number and it is not even, so the statement is false."
    – Thomas Andrews
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:12










  • @ThomasAndrews Thank you
    – Makoto K.
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:12






  • 2




    I didn't deliberately make it minimal, I just realized I couldn't do it with two elements, and was looking for something simple.
    – Thomas Andrews
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:27


















  • What is $f$? There is no $f$ here. It is a binary operation on a set with an identity.
    – Thomas Andrews
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:10










  • @MakotoK. No, the map is $Stimes Sto S$ (since it is a binary operation).
    – Tobias Kildetoft
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:12






  • 1




    The point is, if someone asks you whether, "Are all natural numbers even," you don't show that it is impossible to prove, you just say, "$1$ is a natural number and it is not even, so the statement is false."
    – Thomas Andrews
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:12










  • @ThomasAndrews Thank you
    – Makoto K.
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:12






  • 2




    I didn't deliberately make it minimal, I just realized I couldn't do it with two elements, and was looking for something simple.
    – Thomas Andrews
    Jan 16 '15 at 13:27
















What is $f$? There is no $f$ here. It is a binary operation on a set with an identity.
– Thomas Andrews
Jan 16 '15 at 13:10




What is $f$? There is no $f$ here. It is a binary operation on a set with an identity.
– Thomas Andrews
Jan 16 '15 at 13:10












@MakotoK. No, the map is $Stimes Sto S$ (since it is a binary operation).
– Tobias Kildetoft
Jan 16 '15 at 13:12




@MakotoK. No, the map is $Stimes Sto S$ (since it is a binary operation).
– Tobias Kildetoft
Jan 16 '15 at 13:12




1




1




The point is, if someone asks you whether, "Are all natural numbers even," you don't show that it is impossible to prove, you just say, "$1$ is a natural number and it is not even, so the statement is false."
– Thomas Andrews
Jan 16 '15 at 13:12




The point is, if someone asks you whether, "Are all natural numbers even," you don't show that it is impossible to prove, you just say, "$1$ is a natural number and it is not even, so the statement is false."
– Thomas Andrews
Jan 16 '15 at 13:12












@ThomasAndrews Thank you
– Makoto K.
Jan 16 '15 at 13:12




@ThomasAndrews Thank you
– Makoto K.
Jan 16 '15 at 13:12




2




2




I didn't deliberately make it minimal, I just realized I couldn't do it with two elements, and was looking for something simple.
– Thomas Andrews
Jan 16 '15 at 13:27




I didn't deliberately make it minimal, I just realized I couldn't do it with two elements, and was looking for something simple.
– Thomas Andrews
Jan 16 '15 at 13:27


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1106653%2fbinary-operation-xy-has-identity-but-not-associativity-is-the-inverse-uniqu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bundesstraße 106

Verónica Boquete

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten