Show that $(f|M)(z) := (cz+d)^{-r/2}f(Mz)$ has a weight $r/2$.











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












The following text is from Complex Analysis by Freitag :
enter image description here
For $r ∈ mathbb{Z}$ the modified Petersson notation is defined : $$(f|M)(z) := sqrt{cz+d}^{-r}f(Mz)$$ for $M ∈ SL(2, mathbb{Z})$.



In the theorem above (Proposition VI.5.11), f is a modular form of weight $r/2$ which means $f(Mz)=(cz+d)^{r/2}f(z)$ so, all $(f|M)(z)$'s must have weight $0$ because $(f|M)(z) = (cz+d)^{-r/2}f(Mz)=(cz+d)^{-r/2}(cz+d)^{r/2}f(z) =f(z).$ So how $(f|M)(z)$ has weight $r/2$ or/and consequently $F = Pi (f|M)$ weight $kr/2$?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • No. It meant $f^2$ is a modular form of integer weight $r$ and $F^2$ is a modular form of weight $kr$. If $r < 0$ then $lim_{Im(z) to 0} F(z)^2 = 0$ so (Schwartz reflection principle) $F^2$ is entire and bounded thus constant
    – reuns
    Nov 24 at 3:21












  • @reuns, $F$ is not a product of $f$'s; it's a product of $f|M$'s.
    – 72D
    Nov 24 at 11:01












  • If $f in M_k(Gamma)$ then $f|gamma in M_k(gamma^{-1}Gamma gamma)$ (when there are characters and non-integer weights it needs a little more but the idea is there)
    – reuns
    Nov 25 at 0:24












  • @reuns, Sorry I couldn't understand! Can we analyse my argument in OP so I can know where am I doing wrong, please? I am studying from Freitag's book bc it's the easiest book I've found in MF and I am first year UG student so I will truly appreciate easy explanation.
    – 72D
    Nov 25 at 0:38












  • $f in M_k(Gamma,chi)$ means for every $alpha in Gamma$ then $f(alpha(z)) = pmchi(alpha) (cz+d)^k f(z)$ where $(cz+d)^k = alpha'(z)^{-k/2}$. With $f_2(z) = f(gamma (z))$ then $f_2(alpha(z)) = pm chi(gammaalphagamma^{-1}) (cz+d)^k f(z)$ for $alpha in gamma^{-1}Gamma gamma$.
    – reuns
    Nov 25 at 0:44

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












The following text is from Complex Analysis by Freitag :
enter image description here
For $r ∈ mathbb{Z}$ the modified Petersson notation is defined : $$(f|M)(z) := sqrt{cz+d}^{-r}f(Mz)$$ for $M ∈ SL(2, mathbb{Z})$.



In the theorem above (Proposition VI.5.11), f is a modular form of weight $r/2$ which means $f(Mz)=(cz+d)^{r/2}f(z)$ so, all $(f|M)(z)$'s must have weight $0$ because $(f|M)(z) = (cz+d)^{-r/2}f(Mz)=(cz+d)^{-r/2}(cz+d)^{r/2}f(z) =f(z).$ So how $(f|M)(z)$ has weight $r/2$ or/and consequently $F = Pi (f|M)$ weight $kr/2$?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • No. It meant $f^2$ is a modular form of integer weight $r$ and $F^2$ is a modular form of weight $kr$. If $r < 0$ then $lim_{Im(z) to 0} F(z)^2 = 0$ so (Schwartz reflection principle) $F^2$ is entire and bounded thus constant
    – reuns
    Nov 24 at 3:21












  • @reuns, $F$ is not a product of $f$'s; it's a product of $f|M$'s.
    – 72D
    Nov 24 at 11:01












  • If $f in M_k(Gamma)$ then $f|gamma in M_k(gamma^{-1}Gamma gamma)$ (when there are characters and non-integer weights it needs a little more but the idea is there)
    – reuns
    Nov 25 at 0:24












  • @reuns, Sorry I couldn't understand! Can we analyse my argument in OP so I can know where am I doing wrong, please? I am studying from Freitag's book bc it's the easiest book I've found in MF and I am first year UG student so I will truly appreciate easy explanation.
    – 72D
    Nov 25 at 0:38












  • $f in M_k(Gamma,chi)$ means for every $alpha in Gamma$ then $f(alpha(z)) = pmchi(alpha) (cz+d)^k f(z)$ where $(cz+d)^k = alpha'(z)^{-k/2}$. With $f_2(z) = f(gamma (z))$ then $f_2(alpha(z)) = pm chi(gammaalphagamma^{-1}) (cz+d)^k f(z)$ for $alpha in gamma^{-1}Gamma gamma$.
    – reuns
    Nov 25 at 0:44















up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











The following text is from Complex Analysis by Freitag :
enter image description here
For $r ∈ mathbb{Z}$ the modified Petersson notation is defined : $$(f|M)(z) := sqrt{cz+d}^{-r}f(Mz)$$ for $M ∈ SL(2, mathbb{Z})$.



In the theorem above (Proposition VI.5.11), f is a modular form of weight $r/2$ which means $f(Mz)=(cz+d)^{r/2}f(z)$ so, all $(f|M)(z)$'s must have weight $0$ because $(f|M)(z) = (cz+d)^{-r/2}f(Mz)=(cz+d)^{-r/2}(cz+d)^{r/2}f(z) =f(z).$ So how $(f|M)(z)$ has weight $r/2$ or/and consequently $F = Pi (f|M)$ weight $kr/2$?










share|cite|improve this question















The following text is from Complex Analysis by Freitag :
enter image description here
For $r ∈ mathbb{Z}$ the modified Petersson notation is defined : $$(f|M)(z) := sqrt{cz+d}^{-r}f(Mz)$$ for $M ∈ SL(2, mathbb{Z})$.



In the theorem above (Proposition VI.5.11), f is a modular form of weight $r/2$ which means $f(Mz)=(cz+d)^{r/2}f(z)$ so, all $(f|M)(z)$'s must have weight $0$ because $(f|M)(z) = (cz+d)^{-r/2}f(Mz)=(cz+d)^{-r/2}(cz+d)^{r/2}f(z) =f(z).$ So how $(f|M)(z)$ has weight $r/2$ or/and consequently $F = Pi (f|M)$ weight $kr/2$?







complex-numbers proof-explanation modular-forms






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 24 at 11:21

























asked Nov 24 at 1:49









72D

553116




553116












  • No. It meant $f^2$ is a modular form of integer weight $r$ and $F^2$ is a modular form of weight $kr$. If $r < 0$ then $lim_{Im(z) to 0} F(z)^2 = 0$ so (Schwartz reflection principle) $F^2$ is entire and bounded thus constant
    – reuns
    Nov 24 at 3:21












  • @reuns, $F$ is not a product of $f$'s; it's a product of $f|M$'s.
    – 72D
    Nov 24 at 11:01












  • If $f in M_k(Gamma)$ then $f|gamma in M_k(gamma^{-1}Gamma gamma)$ (when there are characters and non-integer weights it needs a little more but the idea is there)
    – reuns
    Nov 25 at 0:24












  • @reuns, Sorry I couldn't understand! Can we analyse my argument in OP so I can know where am I doing wrong, please? I am studying from Freitag's book bc it's the easiest book I've found in MF and I am first year UG student so I will truly appreciate easy explanation.
    – 72D
    Nov 25 at 0:38












  • $f in M_k(Gamma,chi)$ means for every $alpha in Gamma$ then $f(alpha(z)) = pmchi(alpha) (cz+d)^k f(z)$ where $(cz+d)^k = alpha'(z)^{-k/2}$. With $f_2(z) = f(gamma (z))$ then $f_2(alpha(z)) = pm chi(gammaalphagamma^{-1}) (cz+d)^k f(z)$ for $alpha in gamma^{-1}Gamma gamma$.
    – reuns
    Nov 25 at 0:44




















  • No. It meant $f^2$ is a modular form of integer weight $r$ and $F^2$ is a modular form of weight $kr$. If $r < 0$ then $lim_{Im(z) to 0} F(z)^2 = 0$ so (Schwartz reflection principle) $F^2$ is entire and bounded thus constant
    – reuns
    Nov 24 at 3:21












  • @reuns, $F$ is not a product of $f$'s; it's a product of $f|M$'s.
    – 72D
    Nov 24 at 11:01












  • If $f in M_k(Gamma)$ then $f|gamma in M_k(gamma^{-1}Gamma gamma)$ (when there are characters and non-integer weights it needs a little more but the idea is there)
    – reuns
    Nov 25 at 0:24












  • @reuns, Sorry I couldn't understand! Can we analyse my argument in OP so I can know where am I doing wrong, please? I am studying from Freitag's book bc it's the easiest book I've found in MF and I am first year UG student so I will truly appreciate easy explanation.
    – 72D
    Nov 25 at 0:38












  • $f in M_k(Gamma,chi)$ means for every $alpha in Gamma$ then $f(alpha(z)) = pmchi(alpha) (cz+d)^k f(z)$ where $(cz+d)^k = alpha'(z)^{-k/2}$. With $f_2(z) = f(gamma (z))$ then $f_2(alpha(z)) = pm chi(gammaalphagamma^{-1}) (cz+d)^k f(z)$ for $alpha in gamma^{-1}Gamma gamma$.
    – reuns
    Nov 25 at 0:44


















No. It meant $f^2$ is a modular form of integer weight $r$ and $F^2$ is a modular form of weight $kr$. If $r < 0$ then $lim_{Im(z) to 0} F(z)^2 = 0$ so (Schwartz reflection principle) $F^2$ is entire and bounded thus constant
– reuns
Nov 24 at 3:21






No. It meant $f^2$ is a modular form of integer weight $r$ and $F^2$ is a modular form of weight $kr$. If $r < 0$ then $lim_{Im(z) to 0} F(z)^2 = 0$ so (Schwartz reflection principle) $F^2$ is entire and bounded thus constant
– reuns
Nov 24 at 3:21














@reuns, $F$ is not a product of $f$'s; it's a product of $f|M$'s.
– 72D
Nov 24 at 11:01






@reuns, $F$ is not a product of $f$'s; it's a product of $f|M$'s.
– 72D
Nov 24 at 11:01














If $f in M_k(Gamma)$ then $f|gamma in M_k(gamma^{-1}Gamma gamma)$ (when there are characters and non-integer weights it needs a little more but the idea is there)
– reuns
Nov 25 at 0:24






If $f in M_k(Gamma)$ then $f|gamma in M_k(gamma^{-1}Gamma gamma)$ (when there are characters and non-integer weights it needs a little more but the idea is there)
– reuns
Nov 25 at 0:24














@reuns, Sorry I couldn't understand! Can we analyse my argument in OP so I can know where am I doing wrong, please? I am studying from Freitag's book bc it's the easiest book I've found in MF and I am first year UG student so I will truly appreciate easy explanation.
– 72D
Nov 25 at 0:38






@reuns, Sorry I couldn't understand! Can we analyse my argument in OP so I can know where am I doing wrong, please? I am studying from Freitag's book bc it's the easiest book I've found in MF and I am first year UG student so I will truly appreciate easy explanation.
– 72D
Nov 25 at 0:38














$f in M_k(Gamma,chi)$ means for every $alpha in Gamma$ then $f(alpha(z)) = pmchi(alpha) (cz+d)^k f(z)$ where $(cz+d)^k = alpha'(z)^{-k/2}$. With $f_2(z) = f(gamma (z))$ then $f_2(alpha(z)) = pm chi(gammaalphagamma^{-1}) (cz+d)^k f(z)$ for $alpha in gamma^{-1}Gamma gamma$.
– reuns
Nov 25 at 0:44






$f in M_k(Gamma,chi)$ means for every $alpha in Gamma$ then $f(alpha(z)) = pmchi(alpha) (cz+d)^k f(z)$ where $(cz+d)^k = alpha'(z)^{-k/2}$. With $f_2(z) = f(gamma (z))$ then $f_2(alpha(z)) = pm chi(gammaalphagamma^{-1}) (cz+d)^k f(z)$ for $alpha in gamma^{-1}Gamma gamma$.
– reuns
Nov 25 at 0:44

















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011083%2fshow-that-fmz-czd-r-2fmz-has-a-weight-r-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011083%2fshow-that-fmz-czd-r-2fmz-has-a-weight-r-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bundesstraße 106

Verónica Boquete

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten