For any prime $p$ not a divisor of $ab$, prove that $ax^2 + by^2 equiv с pmod{p}$ is solvable.











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Given any integers $a,b,c$ and any prime $p$ not a divisor of $ab$, prove that $ax^2 + by^2
equiv с pmod{p} $
is solvable.
$p$ does not divide $ab$ implies $p$ does not divide both $a$ and $b$. But from here how can I show that the aforesaid equation is solvable?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • pigeonhole principle: there are, including $0,$ exactly $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $t^2 pmod p ; $ ( this is for odd prime $p$ ). There are $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $a x^2 pmod p ; $ and $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $c-b y^2 pmod p , ; $ so there is an overlap.
    – Will Jagy
    Nov 24 at 1:28






  • 2




    You can apply the method in one of my answer, and obtain a formula for the number of solutions to your equation: math.stackexchange.com/questions/398200/…
    – i707107
    Nov 24 at 2:00















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Given any integers $a,b,c$ and any prime $p$ not a divisor of $ab$, prove that $ax^2 + by^2
equiv с pmod{p} $
is solvable.
$p$ does not divide $ab$ implies $p$ does not divide both $a$ and $b$. But from here how can I show that the aforesaid equation is solvable?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • pigeonhole principle: there are, including $0,$ exactly $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $t^2 pmod p ; $ ( this is for odd prime $p$ ). There are $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $a x^2 pmod p ; $ and $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $c-b y^2 pmod p , ; $ so there is an overlap.
    – Will Jagy
    Nov 24 at 1:28






  • 2




    You can apply the method in one of my answer, and obtain a formula for the number of solutions to your equation: math.stackexchange.com/questions/398200/…
    – i707107
    Nov 24 at 2:00













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Given any integers $a,b,c$ and any prime $p$ not a divisor of $ab$, prove that $ax^2 + by^2
equiv с pmod{p} $
is solvable.
$p$ does not divide $ab$ implies $p$ does not divide both $a$ and $b$. But from here how can I show that the aforesaid equation is solvable?










share|cite|improve this question















Given any integers $a,b,c$ and any prime $p$ not a divisor of $ab$, prove that $ax^2 + by^2
equiv с pmod{p} $
is solvable.
$p$ does not divide $ab$ implies $p$ does not divide both $a$ and $b$. But from here how can I show that the aforesaid equation is solvable?







elementary-number-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 24 at 1:53









Ricardo Largaespada

558212




558212










asked Nov 23 at 23:03









abcdmath

315110




315110












  • pigeonhole principle: there are, including $0,$ exactly $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $t^2 pmod p ; $ ( this is for odd prime $p$ ). There are $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $a x^2 pmod p ; $ and $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $c-b y^2 pmod p , ; $ so there is an overlap.
    – Will Jagy
    Nov 24 at 1:28






  • 2




    You can apply the method in one of my answer, and obtain a formula for the number of solutions to your equation: math.stackexchange.com/questions/398200/…
    – i707107
    Nov 24 at 2:00


















  • pigeonhole principle: there are, including $0,$ exactly $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $t^2 pmod p ; $ ( this is for odd prime $p$ ). There are $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $a x^2 pmod p ; $ and $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $c-b y^2 pmod p , ; $ so there is an overlap.
    – Will Jagy
    Nov 24 at 1:28






  • 2




    You can apply the method in one of my answer, and obtain a formula for the number of solutions to your equation: math.stackexchange.com/questions/398200/…
    – i707107
    Nov 24 at 2:00
















pigeonhole principle: there are, including $0,$ exactly $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $t^2 pmod p ; $ ( this is for odd prime $p$ ). There are $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $a x^2 pmod p ; $ and $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $c-b y^2 pmod p , ; $ so there is an overlap.
– Will Jagy
Nov 24 at 1:28




pigeonhole principle: there are, including $0,$ exactly $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $t^2 pmod p ; $ ( this is for odd prime $p$ ). There are $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $a x^2 pmod p ; $ and $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $c-b y^2 pmod p , ; $ so there is an overlap.
– Will Jagy
Nov 24 at 1:28




2




2




You can apply the method in one of my answer, and obtain a formula for the number of solutions to your equation: math.stackexchange.com/questions/398200/…
– i707107
Nov 24 at 2:00




You can apply the method in one of my answer, and obtain a formula for the number of solutions to your equation: math.stackexchange.com/questions/398200/…
– i707107
Nov 24 at 2:00










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













I might be over simplifying your problem a bit. Let $x,y in mathbb{Z}$. Therefore $x^{2}$ and $y^{2}$ is equal to some integer $q_{1}$ and $q_{2}$ respectively. This is due to the property of multiplicative closure of integers. The left hand side of the equation can now be rewritten as $aq_{1}+bq_{2}$. Once again we can say that $aq_{1}$ is some integer due to integer closure, and $bq_{2}$ is, likewise, an integer by the same argument. By integer closure under addition the two integer products can be rewritten as a single integer called $m$.



Now we can rewrite the equation as follows: $m=c mod(p)$. Which states that there is an integer $m$ that can be rewritten as a distinct congruence class $c$. This can also be rewritten as $m=pq_{3}+c$, for $c<p$ and $q_{3}in mathbb{Z}$



I hope this helps some. Sorry if it was a bit long, I am not sure what direction you wanted to go in.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010949%2ffor-any-prime-p-not-a-divisor-of-ab-prove-that-ax2-by2-equiv-%25d1%2581-pmod%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    I might be over simplifying your problem a bit. Let $x,y in mathbb{Z}$. Therefore $x^{2}$ and $y^{2}$ is equal to some integer $q_{1}$ and $q_{2}$ respectively. This is due to the property of multiplicative closure of integers. The left hand side of the equation can now be rewritten as $aq_{1}+bq_{2}$. Once again we can say that $aq_{1}$ is some integer due to integer closure, and $bq_{2}$ is, likewise, an integer by the same argument. By integer closure under addition the two integer products can be rewritten as a single integer called $m$.



    Now we can rewrite the equation as follows: $m=c mod(p)$. Which states that there is an integer $m$ that can be rewritten as a distinct congruence class $c$. This can also be rewritten as $m=pq_{3}+c$, for $c<p$ and $q_{3}in mathbb{Z}$



    I hope this helps some. Sorry if it was a bit long, I am not sure what direction you wanted to go in.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      I might be over simplifying your problem a bit. Let $x,y in mathbb{Z}$. Therefore $x^{2}$ and $y^{2}$ is equal to some integer $q_{1}$ and $q_{2}$ respectively. This is due to the property of multiplicative closure of integers. The left hand side of the equation can now be rewritten as $aq_{1}+bq_{2}$. Once again we can say that $aq_{1}$ is some integer due to integer closure, and $bq_{2}$ is, likewise, an integer by the same argument. By integer closure under addition the two integer products can be rewritten as a single integer called $m$.



      Now we can rewrite the equation as follows: $m=c mod(p)$. Which states that there is an integer $m$ that can be rewritten as a distinct congruence class $c$. This can also be rewritten as $m=pq_{3}+c$, for $c<p$ and $q_{3}in mathbb{Z}$



      I hope this helps some. Sorry if it was a bit long, I am not sure what direction you wanted to go in.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        I might be over simplifying your problem a bit. Let $x,y in mathbb{Z}$. Therefore $x^{2}$ and $y^{2}$ is equal to some integer $q_{1}$ and $q_{2}$ respectively. This is due to the property of multiplicative closure of integers. The left hand side of the equation can now be rewritten as $aq_{1}+bq_{2}$. Once again we can say that $aq_{1}$ is some integer due to integer closure, and $bq_{2}$ is, likewise, an integer by the same argument. By integer closure under addition the two integer products can be rewritten as a single integer called $m$.



        Now we can rewrite the equation as follows: $m=c mod(p)$. Which states that there is an integer $m$ that can be rewritten as a distinct congruence class $c$. This can also be rewritten as $m=pq_{3}+c$, for $c<p$ and $q_{3}in mathbb{Z}$



        I hope this helps some. Sorry if it was a bit long, I am not sure what direction you wanted to go in.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        I might be over simplifying your problem a bit. Let $x,y in mathbb{Z}$. Therefore $x^{2}$ and $y^{2}$ is equal to some integer $q_{1}$ and $q_{2}$ respectively. This is due to the property of multiplicative closure of integers. The left hand side of the equation can now be rewritten as $aq_{1}+bq_{2}$. Once again we can say that $aq_{1}$ is some integer due to integer closure, and $bq_{2}$ is, likewise, an integer by the same argument. By integer closure under addition the two integer products can be rewritten as a single integer called $m$.



        Now we can rewrite the equation as follows: $m=c mod(p)$. Which states that there is an integer $m$ that can be rewritten as a distinct congruence class $c$. This can also be rewritten as $m=pq_{3}+c$, for $c<p$ and $q_{3}in mathbb{Z}$



        I hope this helps some. Sorry if it was a bit long, I am not sure what direction you wanted to go in.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 24 at 3:35









        multicusp

        211




        211






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010949%2ffor-any-prime-p-not-a-divisor-of-ab-prove-that-ax2-by2-equiv-%25d1%2581-pmod%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Le Mesnil-Réaume

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

            web3.py web3.isConnected() returns false always