For any prime $p$ not a divisor of $ab$, prove that $ax^2 + by^2 equiv с pmod{p}$ is solvable.
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Given any integers $a,b,c$ and any prime $p$ not a divisor of $ab$, prove that $ax^2 + by^2
equiv с pmod{p} $ is solvable.
$p$ does not divide $ab$ implies $p$ does not divide both $a$ and $b$. But from here how can I show that the aforesaid equation is solvable?
elementary-number-theory
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Given any integers $a,b,c$ and any prime $p$ not a divisor of $ab$, prove that $ax^2 + by^2
equiv с pmod{p} $ is solvable.
$p$ does not divide $ab$ implies $p$ does not divide both $a$ and $b$. But from here how can I show that the aforesaid equation is solvable?
elementary-number-theory
pigeonhole principle: there are, including $0,$ exactly $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $t^2 pmod p ; $ ( this is for odd prime $p$ ). There are $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $a x^2 pmod p ; $ and $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $c-b y^2 pmod p , ; $ so there is an overlap.
– Will Jagy
Nov 24 at 1:28
2
You can apply the method in one of my answer, and obtain a formula for the number of solutions to your equation: math.stackexchange.com/questions/398200/…
– i707107
Nov 24 at 2:00
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Given any integers $a,b,c$ and any prime $p$ not a divisor of $ab$, prove that $ax^2 + by^2
equiv с pmod{p} $ is solvable.
$p$ does not divide $ab$ implies $p$ does not divide both $a$ and $b$. But from here how can I show that the aforesaid equation is solvable?
elementary-number-theory
Given any integers $a,b,c$ and any prime $p$ not a divisor of $ab$, prove that $ax^2 + by^2
equiv с pmod{p} $ is solvable.
$p$ does not divide $ab$ implies $p$ does not divide both $a$ and $b$. But from here how can I show that the aforesaid equation is solvable?
elementary-number-theory
elementary-number-theory
edited Nov 24 at 1:53
Ricardo Largaespada
558212
558212
asked Nov 23 at 23:03
abcdmath
315110
315110
pigeonhole principle: there are, including $0,$ exactly $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $t^2 pmod p ; $ ( this is for odd prime $p$ ). There are $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $a x^2 pmod p ; $ and $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $c-b y^2 pmod p , ; $ so there is an overlap.
– Will Jagy
Nov 24 at 1:28
2
You can apply the method in one of my answer, and obtain a formula for the number of solutions to your equation: math.stackexchange.com/questions/398200/…
– i707107
Nov 24 at 2:00
add a comment |
pigeonhole principle: there are, including $0,$ exactly $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $t^2 pmod p ; $ ( this is for odd prime $p$ ). There are $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $a x^2 pmod p ; $ and $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $c-b y^2 pmod p , ; $ so there is an overlap.
– Will Jagy
Nov 24 at 1:28
2
You can apply the method in one of my answer, and obtain a formula for the number of solutions to your equation: math.stackexchange.com/questions/398200/…
– i707107
Nov 24 at 2:00
pigeonhole principle: there are, including $0,$ exactly $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $t^2 pmod p ; $ ( this is for odd prime $p$ ). There are $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $a x^2 pmod p ; $ and $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $c-b y^2 pmod p , ; $ so there is an overlap.
– Will Jagy
Nov 24 at 1:28
pigeonhole principle: there are, including $0,$ exactly $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $t^2 pmod p ; $ ( this is for odd prime $p$ ). There are $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $a x^2 pmod p ; $ and $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $c-b y^2 pmod p , ; $ so there is an overlap.
– Will Jagy
Nov 24 at 1:28
2
2
You can apply the method in one of my answer, and obtain a formula for the number of solutions to your equation: math.stackexchange.com/questions/398200/…
– i707107
Nov 24 at 2:00
You can apply the method in one of my answer, and obtain a formula for the number of solutions to your equation: math.stackexchange.com/questions/398200/…
– i707107
Nov 24 at 2:00
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
I might be over simplifying your problem a bit. Let $x,y in mathbb{Z}$. Therefore $x^{2}$ and $y^{2}$ is equal to some integer $q_{1}$ and $q_{2}$ respectively. This is due to the property of multiplicative closure of integers. The left hand side of the equation can now be rewritten as $aq_{1}+bq_{2}$. Once again we can say that $aq_{1}$ is some integer due to integer closure, and $bq_{2}$ is, likewise, an integer by the same argument. By integer closure under addition the two integer products can be rewritten as a single integer called $m$.
Now we can rewrite the equation as follows: $m=c mod(p)$. Which states that there is an integer $m$ that can be rewritten as a distinct congruence class $c$. This can also be rewritten as $m=pq_{3}+c$, for $c<p$ and $q_{3}in mathbb{Z}$
I hope this helps some. Sorry if it was a bit long, I am not sure what direction you wanted to go in.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010949%2ffor-any-prime-p-not-a-divisor-of-ab-prove-that-ax2-by2-equiv-%25d1%2581-pmod%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
I might be over simplifying your problem a bit. Let $x,y in mathbb{Z}$. Therefore $x^{2}$ and $y^{2}$ is equal to some integer $q_{1}$ and $q_{2}$ respectively. This is due to the property of multiplicative closure of integers. The left hand side of the equation can now be rewritten as $aq_{1}+bq_{2}$. Once again we can say that $aq_{1}$ is some integer due to integer closure, and $bq_{2}$ is, likewise, an integer by the same argument. By integer closure under addition the two integer products can be rewritten as a single integer called $m$.
Now we can rewrite the equation as follows: $m=c mod(p)$. Which states that there is an integer $m$ that can be rewritten as a distinct congruence class $c$. This can also be rewritten as $m=pq_{3}+c$, for $c<p$ and $q_{3}in mathbb{Z}$
I hope this helps some. Sorry if it was a bit long, I am not sure what direction you wanted to go in.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I might be over simplifying your problem a bit. Let $x,y in mathbb{Z}$. Therefore $x^{2}$ and $y^{2}$ is equal to some integer $q_{1}$ and $q_{2}$ respectively. This is due to the property of multiplicative closure of integers. The left hand side of the equation can now be rewritten as $aq_{1}+bq_{2}$. Once again we can say that $aq_{1}$ is some integer due to integer closure, and $bq_{2}$ is, likewise, an integer by the same argument. By integer closure under addition the two integer products can be rewritten as a single integer called $m$.
Now we can rewrite the equation as follows: $m=c mod(p)$. Which states that there is an integer $m$ that can be rewritten as a distinct congruence class $c$. This can also be rewritten as $m=pq_{3}+c$, for $c<p$ and $q_{3}in mathbb{Z}$
I hope this helps some. Sorry if it was a bit long, I am not sure what direction you wanted to go in.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I might be over simplifying your problem a bit. Let $x,y in mathbb{Z}$. Therefore $x^{2}$ and $y^{2}$ is equal to some integer $q_{1}$ and $q_{2}$ respectively. This is due to the property of multiplicative closure of integers. The left hand side of the equation can now be rewritten as $aq_{1}+bq_{2}$. Once again we can say that $aq_{1}$ is some integer due to integer closure, and $bq_{2}$ is, likewise, an integer by the same argument. By integer closure under addition the two integer products can be rewritten as a single integer called $m$.
Now we can rewrite the equation as follows: $m=c mod(p)$. Which states that there is an integer $m$ that can be rewritten as a distinct congruence class $c$. This can also be rewritten as $m=pq_{3}+c$, for $c<p$ and $q_{3}in mathbb{Z}$
I hope this helps some. Sorry if it was a bit long, I am not sure what direction you wanted to go in.
I might be over simplifying your problem a bit. Let $x,y in mathbb{Z}$. Therefore $x^{2}$ and $y^{2}$ is equal to some integer $q_{1}$ and $q_{2}$ respectively. This is due to the property of multiplicative closure of integers. The left hand side of the equation can now be rewritten as $aq_{1}+bq_{2}$. Once again we can say that $aq_{1}$ is some integer due to integer closure, and $bq_{2}$ is, likewise, an integer by the same argument. By integer closure under addition the two integer products can be rewritten as a single integer called $m$.
Now we can rewrite the equation as follows: $m=c mod(p)$. Which states that there is an integer $m$ that can be rewritten as a distinct congruence class $c$. This can also be rewritten as $m=pq_{3}+c$, for $c<p$ and $q_{3}in mathbb{Z}$
I hope this helps some. Sorry if it was a bit long, I am not sure what direction you wanted to go in.
answered Nov 24 at 3:35
multicusp
211
211
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010949%2ffor-any-prime-p-not-a-divisor-of-ab-prove-that-ax2-by2-equiv-%25d1%2581-pmod%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
pigeonhole principle: there are, including $0,$ exactly $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $t^2 pmod p ; $ ( this is for odd prime $p$ ). There are $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $a x^2 pmod p ; $ and $frac{p+1}{2}$ distinct values of $c-b y^2 pmod p , ; $ so there is an overlap.
– Will Jagy
Nov 24 at 1:28
2
You can apply the method in one of my answer, and obtain a formula for the number of solutions to your equation: math.stackexchange.com/questions/398200/…
– i707107
Nov 24 at 2:00