Why this constraint is crucial in a Lagrange multiplier problem?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Consider we need to find the max. and min. values of this function $ f(x,y)=xy $ subject to the constraint $x^2-y=12$.Why it is necessary to assume that $ yleq0$?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Did you construct the Lagrangian and compute it's derivatives? It should be clear then.
    – Mattos
    Nov 24 at 1:31










  • @Mattos yes i did so and while i am solving, I didnot make use this assumption , but i was wondering why this assumption is stated in the question.
    – John adams
    Nov 24 at 3:06










  • After taking derivatives of the Lagrangian, you should get a condition that $y + 2x^2 = 0$...
    – Mattos
    Nov 25 at 7:06















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Consider we need to find the max. and min. values of this function $ f(x,y)=xy $ subject to the constraint $x^2-y=12$.Why it is necessary to assume that $ yleq0$?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Did you construct the Lagrangian and compute it's derivatives? It should be clear then.
    – Mattos
    Nov 24 at 1:31










  • @Mattos yes i did so and while i am solving, I didnot make use this assumption , but i was wondering why this assumption is stated in the question.
    – John adams
    Nov 24 at 3:06










  • After taking derivatives of the Lagrangian, you should get a condition that $y + 2x^2 = 0$...
    – Mattos
    Nov 25 at 7:06













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Consider we need to find the max. and min. values of this function $ f(x,y)=xy $ subject to the constraint $x^2-y=12$.Why it is necessary to assume that $ yleq0$?










share|cite|improve this question















Consider we need to find the max. and min. values of this function $ f(x,y)=xy $ subject to the constraint $x^2-y=12$.Why it is necessary to assume that $ yleq0$?







lagrange-multiplier






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 24 at 1:27









Bernard

117k637109




117k637109










asked Nov 24 at 1:19









John adams

206




206












  • Did you construct the Lagrangian and compute it's derivatives? It should be clear then.
    – Mattos
    Nov 24 at 1:31










  • @Mattos yes i did so and while i am solving, I didnot make use this assumption , but i was wondering why this assumption is stated in the question.
    – John adams
    Nov 24 at 3:06










  • After taking derivatives of the Lagrangian, you should get a condition that $y + 2x^2 = 0$...
    – Mattos
    Nov 25 at 7:06


















  • Did you construct the Lagrangian and compute it's derivatives? It should be clear then.
    – Mattos
    Nov 24 at 1:31










  • @Mattos yes i did so and while i am solving, I didnot make use this assumption , but i was wondering why this assumption is stated in the question.
    – John adams
    Nov 24 at 3:06










  • After taking derivatives of the Lagrangian, you should get a condition that $y + 2x^2 = 0$...
    – Mattos
    Nov 25 at 7:06
















Did you construct the Lagrangian and compute it's derivatives? It should be clear then.
– Mattos
Nov 24 at 1:31




Did you construct the Lagrangian and compute it's derivatives? It should be clear then.
– Mattos
Nov 24 at 1:31












@Mattos yes i did so and while i am solving, I didnot make use this assumption , but i was wondering why this assumption is stated in the question.
– John adams
Nov 24 at 3:06




@Mattos yes i did so and while i am solving, I didnot make use this assumption , but i was wondering why this assumption is stated in the question.
– John adams
Nov 24 at 3:06












After taking derivatives of the Lagrangian, you should get a condition that $y + 2x^2 = 0$...
– Mattos
Nov 25 at 7:06




After taking derivatives of the Lagrangian, you should get a condition that $y + 2x^2 = 0$...
– Mattos
Nov 25 at 7:06















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011059%2fwhy-this-constraint-is-crucial-in-a-lagrange-multiplier-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011059%2fwhy-this-constraint-is-crucial-in-a-lagrange-multiplier-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bundesstraße 106

Verónica Boquete

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten