How to calculate $intfrac{e^{iz}}{z}, dz$ on the semi-circle given by $re^{itheta}$ where $theta:,0topi$












0












$begingroup$


I was reading this post and in the comments someone said that the difficult in calculating the limit as $r$ goes to $0$ is a lot different than calculating the limit. I tried to calculate the integral and don't seems that difficult but a lot of algebraic work, are there a trick to easily calculate the integral?.






complex-analysis line-integrals







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    We can make a keyhole contour, use Cauchy residue theorem and the fact that we know what the only poles inside are. I don't know which contour would be easiest. I guess either full circle and use some symmetricity or or half circle.
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Nov 30 '18 at 16:50










  • $begingroup$
    @mathreadler Symmetry would be hard to come by, as the integrand takes much larger values on the lower half-plane than on the upper.
    $endgroup$
    – Connor Harris
    Nov 30 '18 at 16:57
















0












$begingroup$


I was reading this post and in the comments someone said that the difficult in calculating the limit as $r$ goes to $0$ is a lot different than calculating the limit. I tried to calculate the integral and don't seems that difficult but a lot of algebraic work, are there a trick to easily calculate the integral?.






complex-analysis line-integrals







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    We can make a keyhole contour, use Cauchy residue theorem and the fact that we know what the only poles inside are. I don't know which contour would be easiest. I guess either full circle and use some symmetricity or or half circle.
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Nov 30 '18 at 16:50










  • $begingroup$
    @mathreadler Symmetry would be hard to come by, as the integrand takes much larger values on the lower half-plane than on the upper.
    $endgroup$
    – Connor Harris
    Nov 30 '18 at 16:57














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I was reading this post and in the comments someone said that the difficult in calculating the limit as $r$ goes to $0$ is a lot different than calculating the limit. I tried to calculate the integral and don't seems that difficult but a lot of algebraic work, are there a trick to easily calculate the integral?.






complex-analysis line-integrals







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I was reading this post and in the comments someone said that the difficult in calculating the limit as $r$ goes to $0$ is a lot different than calculating the limit. I tried to calculate the integral and don't seems that difficult but a lot of algebraic work, are there a trick to easily calculate the integral?.






complex-analysis line-integrals




complex-analysis line-integrals






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 30 '18 at 16:27









Maria GuthierMaria Guthier

867




867








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    We can make a keyhole contour, use Cauchy residue theorem and the fact that we know what the only poles inside are. I don't know which contour would be easiest. I guess either full circle and use some symmetricity or or half circle.
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Nov 30 '18 at 16:50










  • $begingroup$
    @mathreadler Symmetry would be hard to come by, as the integrand takes much larger values on the lower half-plane than on the upper.
    $endgroup$
    – Connor Harris
    Nov 30 '18 at 16:57














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    We can make a keyhole contour, use Cauchy residue theorem and the fact that we know what the only poles inside are. I don't know which contour would be easiest. I guess either full circle and use some symmetricity or or half circle.
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Nov 30 '18 at 16:50










  • $begingroup$
    @mathreadler Symmetry would be hard to come by, as the integrand takes much larger values on the lower half-plane than on the upper.
    $endgroup$
    – Connor Harris
    Nov 30 '18 at 16:57








1




1




$begingroup$
We can make a keyhole contour, use Cauchy residue theorem and the fact that we know what the only poles inside are. I don't know which contour would be easiest. I guess either full circle and use some symmetricity or or half circle.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Nov 30 '18 at 16:50




$begingroup$
We can make a keyhole contour, use Cauchy residue theorem and the fact that we know what the only poles inside are. I don't know which contour would be easiest. I guess either full circle and use some symmetricity or or half circle.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Nov 30 '18 at 16:50












$begingroup$
@mathreadler Symmetry would be hard to come by, as the integrand takes much larger values on the lower half-plane than on the upper.
$endgroup$
– Connor Harris
Nov 30 '18 at 16:57




$begingroup$
@mathreadler Symmetry would be hard to come by, as the integrand takes much larger values on the lower half-plane than on the upper.
$endgroup$
– Connor Harris
Nov 30 '18 at 16:57










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

There's no closed form. Take a counterclockwise contour comprising a large semicircle ${r e^{i theta} | 0 leq theta leq pi}$, a small semicircle ${epsilon e^{i theta} | 0 leq theta leq pi}$, and real intervals $[-r, -epsilon]$ and $[epsilon, r]$. This looks like a semicircle with a dimple cut out around the origin. The integrand has no poles in this region, so the integral around the whole contour is zero. If $x$ is real, then $$frac{e^{ix}}{x} = frac{i sin x}{x} = frac{i sin (-x)}{-x} = frac{e^{-ix}}{-x}$$ so the integrals over the real intervals are the same and equal $i int_epsilon^r frac{sin x}{x}, dx$, which has no closed form; the special function $operatorname{Si}(x) = int_0^x frac{sin t}{t}, dt$ is sometimes used.



Finally, as shown in the question you linked, at the $epsilon to 0$ limit, the integral over the small semicircle is $-pi i$ (with the negative sign because the contour traverses this small semicircle in the wrong direction, left-to-right). Thus the integral over the outer semicircle is $$pi i - 2i operatorname{Si}(r).$$



It's possible to show that the $r to infty$ limit of this expression is zero.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    But the integral of just the arc! is then $pi i$
    $endgroup$
    – Maria Guthier
    Nov 30 '18 at 21:04



















1












$begingroup$

$newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$




By closing the contour along the real axis while an indent $ds{braces{z mid z = epsilonexpo{ictheta}, r > epsilon > 0, theta in bracks{0,pi} }}$ is provided, I'll find:




begin{align}
&bbox[10px,#ffd]{int_{large z in rexppars{icbracks{0,pi}}
atop large r > 0}{expo{ic z} over z},dd z}
\[5mm] = &
lim_{epsilon to 0^{large +}}pars{-int_{-r}^{-epsilon}{expo{ic x} over x},dd x - int_{pi}^{0}ic,ddtheta
-int_{epsilon}^{r}{expo{ic x} over x},dd x}
\[5mm] = &
lim_{epsilon to 0^{large +}}pars{int_{epsilon}^{r}{expo{-ic x} over x},dd x + piic
-int_{epsilon}^{r}{expo{ic x} over x},dd x}
\[5mm] = &
piic - 2icint_{0}^{r}{sinpars{x} over x}
,dd x = bbx{piic - 2ic,mrm{Si}pars{r}}
end{align}




$ds{mrm{Si}}$ is the
Sine Integral Function.







share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You have a sign wrong on the $-pi i$ term.
    $endgroup$
    – Connor Harris
    Nov 30 '18 at 17:08










  • $begingroup$
    @ConnorHarris Thanks. Fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – Felix Marin
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:29











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020285%2fhow-to-calculate-int-fraceizz-dz-on-the-semi-circle-given-by-rei%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

There's no closed form. Take a counterclockwise contour comprising a large semicircle ${r e^{i theta} | 0 leq theta leq pi}$, a small semicircle ${epsilon e^{i theta} | 0 leq theta leq pi}$, and real intervals $[-r, -epsilon]$ and $[epsilon, r]$. This looks like a semicircle with a dimple cut out around the origin. The integrand has no poles in this region, so the integral around the whole contour is zero. If $x$ is real, then $$frac{e^{ix}}{x} = frac{i sin x}{x} = frac{i sin (-x)}{-x} = frac{e^{-ix}}{-x}$$ so the integrals over the real intervals are the same and equal $i int_epsilon^r frac{sin x}{x}, dx$, which has no closed form; the special function $operatorname{Si}(x) = int_0^x frac{sin t}{t}, dt$ is sometimes used.



Finally, as shown in the question you linked, at the $epsilon to 0$ limit, the integral over the small semicircle is $-pi i$ (with the negative sign because the contour traverses this small semicircle in the wrong direction, left-to-right). Thus the integral over the outer semicircle is $$pi i - 2i operatorname{Si}(r).$$



It's possible to show that the $r to infty$ limit of this expression is zero.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    But the integral of just the arc! is then $pi i$
    $endgroup$
    – Maria Guthier
    Nov 30 '18 at 21:04
















1












$begingroup$

There's no closed form. Take a counterclockwise contour comprising a large semicircle ${r e^{i theta} | 0 leq theta leq pi}$, a small semicircle ${epsilon e^{i theta} | 0 leq theta leq pi}$, and real intervals $[-r, -epsilon]$ and $[epsilon, r]$. This looks like a semicircle with a dimple cut out around the origin. The integrand has no poles in this region, so the integral around the whole contour is zero. If $x$ is real, then $$frac{e^{ix}}{x} = frac{i sin x}{x} = frac{i sin (-x)}{-x} = frac{e^{-ix}}{-x}$$ so the integrals over the real intervals are the same and equal $i int_epsilon^r frac{sin x}{x}, dx$, which has no closed form; the special function $operatorname{Si}(x) = int_0^x frac{sin t}{t}, dt$ is sometimes used.



Finally, as shown in the question you linked, at the $epsilon to 0$ limit, the integral over the small semicircle is $-pi i$ (with the negative sign because the contour traverses this small semicircle in the wrong direction, left-to-right). Thus the integral over the outer semicircle is $$pi i - 2i operatorname{Si}(r).$$



It's possible to show that the $r to infty$ limit of this expression is zero.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    But the integral of just the arc! is then $pi i$
    $endgroup$
    – Maria Guthier
    Nov 30 '18 at 21:04














1












1








1





$begingroup$

There's no closed form. Take a counterclockwise contour comprising a large semicircle ${r e^{i theta} | 0 leq theta leq pi}$, a small semicircle ${epsilon e^{i theta} | 0 leq theta leq pi}$, and real intervals $[-r, -epsilon]$ and $[epsilon, r]$. This looks like a semicircle with a dimple cut out around the origin. The integrand has no poles in this region, so the integral around the whole contour is zero. If $x$ is real, then $$frac{e^{ix}}{x} = frac{i sin x}{x} = frac{i sin (-x)}{-x} = frac{e^{-ix}}{-x}$$ so the integrals over the real intervals are the same and equal $i int_epsilon^r frac{sin x}{x}, dx$, which has no closed form; the special function $operatorname{Si}(x) = int_0^x frac{sin t}{t}, dt$ is sometimes used.



Finally, as shown in the question you linked, at the $epsilon to 0$ limit, the integral over the small semicircle is $-pi i$ (with the negative sign because the contour traverses this small semicircle in the wrong direction, left-to-right). Thus the integral over the outer semicircle is $$pi i - 2i operatorname{Si}(r).$$



It's possible to show that the $r to infty$ limit of this expression is zero.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



There's no closed form. Take a counterclockwise contour comprising a large semicircle ${r e^{i theta} | 0 leq theta leq pi}$, a small semicircle ${epsilon e^{i theta} | 0 leq theta leq pi}$, and real intervals $[-r, -epsilon]$ and $[epsilon, r]$. This looks like a semicircle with a dimple cut out around the origin. The integrand has no poles in this region, so the integral around the whole contour is zero. If $x$ is real, then $$frac{e^{ix}}{x} = frac{i sin x}{x} = frac{i sin (-x)}{-x} = frac{e^{-ix}}{-x}$$ so the integrals over the real intervals are the same and equal $i int_epsilon^r frac{sin x}{x}, dx$, which has no closed form; the special function $operatorname{Si}(x) = int_0^x frac{sin t}{t}, dt$ is sometimes used.



Finally, as shown in the question you linked, at the $epsilon to 0$ limit, the integral over the small semicircle is $-pi i$ (with the negative sign because the contour traverses this small semicircle in the wrong direction, left-to-right). Thus the integral over the outer semicircle is $$pi i - 2i operatorname{Si}(r).$$



It's possible to show that the $r to infty$ limit of this expression is zero.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 3 '18 at 14:22

























answered Nov 30 '18 at 17:08









Connor HarrisConnor Harris

4,350724




4,350724












  • $begingroup$
    But the integral of just the arc! is then $pi i$
    $endgroup$
    – Maria Guthier
    Nov 30 '18 at 21:04


















  • $begingroup$
    But the integral of just the arc! is then $pi i$
    $endgroup$
    – Maria Guthier
    Nov 30 '18 at 21:04
















$begingroup$
But the integral of just the arc! is then $pi i$
$endgroup$
– Maria Guthier
Nov 30 '18 at 21:04




$begingroup$
But the integral of just the arc! is then $pi i$
$endgroup$
– Maria Guthier
Nov 30 '18 at 21:04











1












$begingroup$

$newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$




By closing the contour along the real axis while an indent $ds{braces{z mid z = epsilonexpo{ictheta}, r > epsilon > 0, theta in bracks{0,pi} }}$ is provided, I'll find:




begin{align}
&bbox[10px,#ffd]{int_{large z in rexppars{icbracks{0,pi}}
atop large r > 0}{expo{ic z} over z},dd z}
\[5mm] = &
lim_{epsilon to 0^{large +}}pars{-int_{-r}^{-epsilon}{expo{ic x} over x},dd x - int_{pi}^{0}ic,ddtheta
-int_{epsilon}^{r}{expo{ic x} over x},dd x}
\[5mm] = &
lim_{epsilon to 0^{large +}}pars{int_{epsilon}^{r}{expo{-ic x} over x},dd x + piic
-int_{epsilon}^{r}{expo{ic x} over x},dd x}
\[5mm] = &
piic - 2icint_{0}^{r}{sinpars{x} over x}
,dd x = bbx{piic - 2ic,mrm{Si}pars{r}}
end{align}




$ds{mrm{Si}}$ is the
Sine Integral Function.







share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You have a sign wrong on the $-pi i$ term.
    $endgroup$
    – Connor Harris
    Nov 30 '18 at 17:08










  • $begingroup$
    @ConnorHarris Thanks. Fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – Felix Marin
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:29
















1












$begingroup$

$newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$




By closing the contour along the real axis while an indent $ds{braces{z mid z = epsilonexpo{ictheta}, r > epsilon > 0, theta in bracks{0,pi} }}$ is provided, I'll find:




begin{align}
&bbox[10px,#ffd]{int_{large z in rexppars{icbracks{0,pi}}
atop large r > 0}{expo{ic z} over z},dd z}
\[5mm] = &
lim_{epsilon to 0^{large +}}pars{-int_{-r}^{-epsilon}{expo{ic x} over x},dd x - int_{pi}^{0}ic,ddtheta
-int_{epsilon}^{r}{expo{ic x} over x},dd x}
\[5mm] = &
lim_{epsilon to 0^{large +}}pars{int_{epsilon}^{r}{expo{-ic x} over x},dd x + piic
-int_{epsilon}^{r}{expo{ic x} over x},dd x}
\[5mm] = &
piic - 2icint_{0}^{r}{sinpars{x} over x}
,dd x = bbx{piic - 2ic,mrm{Si}pars{r}}
end{align}




$ds{mrm{Si}}$ is the
Sine Integral Function.







share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You have a sign wrong on the $-pi i$ term.
    $endgroup$
    – Connor Harris
    Nov 30 '18 at 17:08










  • $begingroup$
    @ConnorHarris Thanks. Fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – Felix Marin
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:29














1












1








1





$begingroup$

$newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$




By closing the contour along the real axis while an indent $ds{braces{z mid z = epsilonexpo{ictheta}, r > epsilon > 0, theta in bracks{0,pi} }}$ is provided, I'll find:




begin{align}
&bbox[10px,#ffd]{int_{large z in rexppars{icbracks{0,pi}}
atop large r > 0}{expo{ic z} over z},dd z}
\[5mm] = &
lim_{epsilon to 0^{large +}}pars{-int_{-r}^{-epsilon}{expo{ic x} over x},dd x - int_{pi}^{0}ic,ddtheta
-int_{epsilon}^{r}{expo{ic x} over x},dd x}
\[5mm] = &
lim_{epsilon to 0^{large +}}pars{int_{epsilon}^{r}{expo{-ic x} over x},dd x + piic
-int_{epsilon}^{r}{expo{ic x} over x},dd x}
\[5mm] = &
piic - 2icint_{0}^{r}{sinpars{x} over x}
,dd x = bbx{piic - 2ic,mrm{Si}pars{r}}
end{align}




$ds{mrm{Si}}$ is the
Sine Integral Function.







share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



$newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$




By closing the contour along the real axis while an indent $ds{braces{z mid z = epsilonexpo{ictheta}, r > epsilon > 0, theta in bracks{0,pi} }}$ is provided, I'll find:




begin{align}
&bbox[10px,#ffd]{int_{large z in rexppars{icbracks{0,pi}}
atop large r > 0}{expo{ic z} over z},dd z}
\[5mm] = &
lim_{epsilon to 0^{large +}}pars{-int_{-r}^{-epsilon}{expo{ic x} over x},dd x - int_{pi}^{0}ic,ddtheta
-int_{epsilon}^{r}{expo{ic x} over x},dd x}
\[5mm] = &
lim_{epsilon to 0^{large +}}pars{int_{epsilon}^{r}{expo{-ic x} over x},dd x + piic
-int_{epsilon}^{r}{expo{ic x} over x},dd x}
\[5mm] = &
piic - 2icint_{0}^{r}{sinpars{x} over x}
,dd x = bbx{piic - 2ic,mrm{Si}pars{r}}
end{align}




$ds{mrm{Si}}$ is the
Sine Integral Function.








share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 3 '18 at 20:45

























answered Nov 30 '18 at 17:06









Felix MarinFelix Marin

67.3k7107141




67.3k7107141












  • $begingroup$
    You have a sign wrong on the $-pi i$ term.
    $endgroup$
    – Connor Harris
    Nov 30 '18 at 17:08










  • $begingroup$
    @ConnorHarris Thanks. Fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – Felix Marin
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:29


















  • $begingroup$
    You have a sign wrong on the $-pi i$ term.
    $endgroup$
    – Connor Harris
    Nov 30 '18 at 17:08










  • $begingroup$
    @ConnorHarris Thanks. Fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – Felix Marin
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:29
















$begingroup$
You have a sign wrong on the $-pi i$ term.
$endgroup$
– Connor Harris
Nov 30 '18 at 17:08




$begingroup$
You have a sign wrong on the $-pi i$ term.
$endgroup$
– Connor Harris
Nov 30 '18 at 17:08












$begingroup$
@ConnorHarris Thanks. Fixed.
$endgroup$
– Felix Marin
Dec 3 '18 at 20:29




$begingroup$
@ConnorHarris Thanks. Fixed.
$endgroup$
– Felix Marin
Dec 3 '18 at 20:29


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020285%2fhow-to-calculate-int-fraceizz-dz-on-the-semi-circle-given-by-rei%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Bundesstraße 106

Image
Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück
Read more

Verónica Boquete

Image
Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl
Read more

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

Image
Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich
Read more