Correct way to align equations equal to zero
$begingroup$
This is a question related to formatting. I have an expression that is equal to zero; I work over this expression to obtain a final relation as shown below:
$$begin{align*}
0 & =int_{V}nablacdotmathbf{A},mathrm{d}V\
& =int_{S}mathbf{A}cdot dmathbf{S}\
& =int_{S}mathbf{hat{n}}cdotmathbf{A},dmathit{S}\
& =left(mathbf{A}_{i}-mathbf{A}_{e}right)cdotmathbf{hat{n}}
end{align*}$$
My question is: is it correct formatting to leave the zero in the left hand side? I have searched for answers but I could not find it. Thanks in advance.
notation
edited Dec 7 '18 at 16:35
Scientifica
6,75141335
asked Dec 7 '18 at 16:01
nodarksidenodarkside
406
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a question related to formatting. I have an expression that is equal to zero; I work over this expression to obtain a final relation as shown below:
$$begin{align*}
0 & =int_{V}nablacdotmathbf{A},mathrm{d}V\
& =int_{S}mathbf{A}cdot dmathbf{S}\
& =int_{S}mathbf{hat{n}}cdotmathbf{A},dmathit{S}\
& =left(mathbf{A}_{i}-mathbf{A}_{e}right)cdotmathbf{hat{n}}
end{align*}$$
My question is: is it correct formatting to leave the zero in the left hand side? I have searched for answers but I could not find it. Thanks in advance.
notation
edited Dec 7 '18 at 16:35
Scientifica
6,75141335
asked Dec 7 '18 at 16:01
nodarksidenodarkside
406
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I see nothing wrong with that.
$endgroup$
– MisterRiemann
Dec 7 '18 at 16:04
$begingroup$
I've seen many such calculations. The only other way to format it that would look natural to me would be to reverse the entire calculation, starting with $left(mathbf{A}_{i}-mathbf{A}_{e}right)cdotmathbf{hat{n}}$ and concluding with $0$. But if the natural flow of your argument in its context runs the direction you've shown, there is nothing wrong with it.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Dec 8 '18 at 2:42
$begingroup$
That looks correct to me, but... I feel like this question should be on Meta instead. On the other hand, the notation tag description does mention usage...
$endgroup$
– Robert Soupe
Dec 8 '18 at 2:47
$begingroup$
Thanks for your responses! This was very helful !
$endgroup$
– nodarkside
Dec 8 '18 at 2:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a question related to formatting. I have an expression that is equal to zero; I work over this expression to obtain a final relation as shown below:
$$begin{align*}
0 & =int_{V}nablacdotmathbf{A},mathrm{d}V\
& =int_{S}mathbf{A}cdot dmathbf{S}\
& =int_{S}mathbf{hat{n}}cdotmathbf{A},dmathit{S}\
& =left(mathbf{A}_{i}-mathbf{A}_{e}right)cdotmathbf{hat{n}}
end{align*}$$
My question is: is it correct formatting to leave the zero in the left hand side? I have searched for answers but I could not find it. Thanks in advance.
notation
edited Dec 7 '18 at 16:35
Scientifica
6,75141335
asked Dec 7 '18 at 16:01
nodarksidenodarkside
406
$endgroup$
This is a question related to formatting. I have an expression that is equal to zero; I work over this expression to obtain a final relation as shown below:
$$begin{align*}
0 & =int_{V}nablacdotmathbf{A},mathrm{d}V\
& =int_{S}mathbf{A}cdot dmathbf{S}\
& =int_{S}mathbf{hat{n}}cdotmathbf{A},dmathit{S}\
& =left(mathbf{A}_{i}-mathbf{A}_{e}right)cdotmathbf{hat{n}}
end{align*}$$
My question is: is it correct formatting to leave the zero in the left hand side? I have searched for answers but I could not find it. Thanks in advance.
notation
notation
edited Dec 7 '18 at 16:35
Scientifica
6,75141335
asked Dec 7 '18 at 16:01
nodarksidenodarkside
406
edited Dec 7 '18 at 16:35
Scientifica
6,75141335
asked Dec 7 '18 at 16:01
nodarksidenodarkside
406
edited Dec 7 '18 at 16:35
Scientifica
6,75141335
edited Dec 7 '18 at 16:35
Scientifica
6,75141335
edited Dec 7 '18 at 16:35
Scientifica
6,75141335
6,75141335
asked Dec 7 '18 at 16:01
nodarksidenodarkside
406
asked Dec 7 '18 at 16:01
nodarksidenodarkside
406
asked Dec 7 '18 at 16:01
nodarksidenodarkside
406
406
1
$begingroup$
I see nothing wrong with that.
$endgroup$
– MisterRiemann
Dec 7 '18 at 16:04
$begingroup$
I've seen many such calculations. The only other way to format it that would look natural to me would be to reverse the entire calculation, starting with $left(mathbf{A}_{i}-mathbf{A}_{e}right)cdotmathbf{hat{n}}$ and concluding with $0$. But if the natural flow of your argument in its context runs the direction you've shown, there is nothing wrong with it.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Dec 8 '18 at 2:42
$begingroup$
That looks correct to me, but... I feel like this question should be on Meta instead. On the other hand, the notation tag description does mention usage...
$endgroup$
– Robert Soupe
Dec 8 '18 at 2:47
$begingroup$
Thanks for your responses! This was very helful !
$endgroup$
– nodarkside
Dec 8 '18 at 2:51
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
I see nothing wrong with that.
$endgroup$
– MisterRiemann
Dec 7 '18 at 16:04
$begingroup$
I've seen many such calculations. The only other way to format it that would look natural to me would be to reverse the entire calculation, starting with $left(mathbf{A}_{i}-mathbf{A}_{e}right)cdotmathbf{hat{n}}$ and concluding with $0$. But if the natural flow of your argument in its context runs the direction you've shown, there is nothing wrong with it.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Dec 8 '18 at 2:42
$begingroup$
That looks correct to me, but... I feel like this question should be on Meta instead. On the other hand, the notation tag description does mention usage...
$endgroup$
– Robert Soupe
Dec 8 '18 at 2:47
$begingroup$
Thanks for your responses! This was very helful !
$endgroup$
– nodarkside
Dec 8 '18 at 2:51
1
1
$begingroup$
I see nothing wrong with that.
$endgroup$
– MisterRiemann
Dec 7 '18 at 16:04
$begingroup$
I see nothing wrong with that.
$endgroup$
– MisterRiemann
Dec 7 '18 at 16:04
$begingroup$
I've seen many such calculations. The only other way to format it that would look natural to me would be to reverse the entire calculation, starting with $left(mathbf{A}_{i}-mathbf{A}_{e}right)cdotmathbf{hat{n}}$ and concluding with $0$. But if the natural flow of your argument in its context runs the direction you've shown, there is nothing wrong with it.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Dec 8 '18 at 2:42
$begingroup$
I've seen many such calculations. The only other way to format it that would look natural to me would be to reverse the entire calculation, starting with $left(mathbf{A}_{i}-mathbf{A}_{e}right)cdotmathbf{hat{n}}$ and concluding with $0$. But if the natural flow of your argument in its context runs the direction you've shown, there is nothing wrong with it.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Dec 8 '18 at 2:42
$begingroup$
That looks correct to me, but... I feel like this question should be on Meta instead. On the other hand, the notation tag description does mention usage...
$endgroup$
– Robert Soupe
Dec 8 '18 at 2:47
$begingroup$
That looks correct to me, but... I feel like this question should be on Meta instead. On the other hand, the notation tag description does mention usage...
$endgroup$
– Robert Soupe
Dec 8 '18 at 2:47
$begingroup$
Thanks for your responses! This was very helful !
$endgroup$
– nodarkside
Dec 8 '18 at 2:51
$begingroup$
Thanks for your responses! This was very helful !
$endgroup$
– nodarkside
Dec 8 '18 at 2:51
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030053%2fcorrect-way-to-align-equations-equal-to-zero%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030053%2fcorrect-way-to-align-equations-equal-to-zero%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
I see nothing wrong with that.
$endgroup$
– MisterRiemann
Dec 7 '18 at 16:04
$begingroup$
I've seen many such calculations. The only other way to format it that would look natural to me would be to reverse the entire calculation, starting with $left(mathbf{A}_{i}-mathbf{A}_{e}right)cdotmathbf{hat{n}}$ and concluding with $0$. But if the natural flow of your argument in its context runs the direction you've shown, there is nothing wrong with it.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Dec 8 '18 at 2:42
$begingroup$
That looks correct to me, but... I feel like this question should be on Meta instead. On the other hand, the notation tag description does mention usage...
$endgroup$
– Robert Soupe
Dec 8 '18 at 2:47
$begingroup$
Thanks for your responses! This was very helful !
$endgroup$
– nodarkside
Dec 8 '18 at 2:51