Evaluate$intlimits_0^1...
$begingroup$
$$mathfrak{I}=intlimits_0^1 left[log(x)log(1-x)+operatorname{Li}_2(x)right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}right]mathrm dx=4zeta(2)zeta(3)-9zeta(5)tag1$$
This integral haunts me for while and I am still unable to evaluate it which annoys me even more. For the first time I have encountered it within Mathematical Analysis $-$ A collection of Problems by Tolaso J. Kos $($Page $27$, Problem $282$$)$ and I am still stumped by this one.
However, today I am have come across this question asking for the evaluation of the integral
$$mathfrak{J}=intlimits_0^{pi/2}frac{log^2(sin x)log^2(cos x)}{sin xcos x}mathrm dx=frac12zeta(5)-frac14zeta(2)zeta(3)tag2$$
Which can done be "rather simple" by invoking the fourth derivative of the Beta Function. I was baffled as I recognized the structure of the final value; moreover reminding me of the logarithmic integral $(1)$ I was not able to evaluate. It might turn out that this relation is by pure chance but nevertheless it motivated me to look at $(1)$ again. It is hardly probable that $(1)$ can be done in a similiar way like $(2)$ in xpaul's answer to the linked question due the involved Dilogarithms $-$ but anyway you can prove me wrong.
I have not got that far with $(1)$ but however I noticed two, I would say quite interesting, facts about the integral. First of all consider the following, well-known functional relation of the Dilogarithm
$$operatorname{Li}_2(x)+operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)=zeta(2)-log(x)log(1-x)$$
which can be used in order to get rid of the $log(x)log(1-x)$-term within $(1)$ and leading to
$$smallintlimits_0^1 left[log(x)log(1-x)+operatorname{Li}_2(x)right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}right]mathrm dx=intlimits_0^1 left[zeta(2)-operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}right]mathrm dx$$
Secondly applying the subsititution $x=1-x$ after a minor reshape yields to
$$smallbegin{align}
intlimits_0^1 left[zeta(2)-operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}right]mathrm dx&=intlimits_0^1 left[frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}-frac{operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}x-zeta(2)right]mathrm dx\
&=intlimits_0^1 left[zeta(2)-operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}x-zeta(2)right]frac{mathrm dx}{1-x}\
&=intlimits_0^1 left[zeta(2)-operatorname{Li}_2(x)right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}-zeta(2)right]frac{mathrm dx}x\
&=intlimits_0^1 left[frac{zeta(2)}x-frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}xright]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}-zeta(2)right]mathrm dx
end{align}$$
I want to point out the quite interesting one could say "almost"-symmetry of the two integrals
$$begin{align}
mathfrak{I}_1&=intlimits_0^1 left[frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}-frac{operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}x-zeta(2)right]mathrm dx\
mathfrak{I}_2&=intlimits_0^1 left[frac{zeta(2)}x-frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}xright]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}-zeta(2)right]mathrm dx
end{align}$$
which might be helpful for the actual evaluation. But from hereon I have no clue how to continue.
Just multplying the two brackets out does not seem like a good idea to me hence one the one hand it is not elegant at all and on the other hand it would lead to to the term $operatorname{Li}_2(x)operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)$ for which I have no idea how to deal with concerning the fact that I am not used to e.g. double series and their evaluation. I also tried various ways of Integration by Parts but this seems to be pointless since all variations ended up in producing a divergent term $-$ unless I have missed a sepcial choice of $u$ and $mathrm v$. I have not figured out a suitable substitution nor an appropriate newly introduced parameter $($for the application of Feynman's Trick$)$ and the I do not know whether a series expansion would be helpful or not $($connected with this issue is the possibility of a double summation with which I cannot really deal$)$.
Thus, I am asking for the closed-form evaluation of $(1)$ hopefully equal to the given value $($which works out numerically according to WolframAlpha$)$. Even though I have troubles with double series I would accept an answer invoking these notwithstanding that I would appreciate a solution without involving them. Hence this integral appeared within a collocation of Analysis Probelms I am rather sure that it has been already evaluated somewhere $($maybe even here on MSE where I was not able to find it$)$.
Thanks in advance!
integration definite-integrals closed-form riemann-zeta polylogarithm
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
$$mathfrak{I}=intlimits_0^1 left[log(x)log(1-x)+operatorname{Li}_2(x)right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}right]mathrm dx=4zeta(2)zeta(3)-9zeta(5)tag1$$
This integral haunts me for while and I am still unable to evaluate it which annoys me even more. For the first time I have encountered it within Mathematical Analysis $-$ A collection of Problems by Tolaso J. Kos $($Page $27$, Problem $282$$)$ and I am still stumped by this one.
However, today I am have come across this question asking for the evaluation of the integral
$$mathfrak{J}=intlimits_0^{pi/2}frac{log^2(sin x)log^2(cos x)}{sin xcos x}mathrm dx=frac12zeta(5)-frac14zeta(2)zeta(3)tag2$$
Which can done be "rather simple" by invoking the fourth derivative of the Beta Function. I was baffled as I recognized the structure of the final value; moreover reminding me of the logarithmic integral $(1)$ I was not able to evaluate. It might turn out that this relation is by pure chance but nevertheless it motivated me to look at $(1)$ again. It is hardly probable that $(1)$ can be done in a similiar way like $(2)$ in xpaul's answer to the linked question due the involved Dilogarithms $-$ but anyway you can prove me wrong.
I have not got that far with $(1)$ but however I noticed two, I would say quite interesting, facts about the integral. First of all consider the following, well-known functional relation of the Dilogarithm
$$operatorname{Li}_2(x)+operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)=zeta(2)-log(x)log(1-x)$$
which can be used in order to get rid of the $log(x)log(1-x)$-term within $(1)$ and leading to
$$smallintlimits_0^1 left[log(x)log(1-x)+operatorname{Li}_2(x)right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}right]mathrm dx=intlimits_0^1 left[zeta(2)-operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}right]mathrm dx$$
Secondly applying the subsititution $x=1-x$ after a minor reshape yields to
$$smallbegin{align}
intlimits_0^1 left[zeta(2)-operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}right]mathrm dx&=intlimits_0^1 left[frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}-frac{operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}x-zeta(2)right]mathrm dx\
&=intlimits_0^1 left[zeta(2)-operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}x-zeta(2)right]frac{mathrm dx}{1-x}\
&=intlimits_0^1 left[zeta(2)-operatorname{Li}_2(x)right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}-zeta(2)right]frac{mathrm dx}x\
&=intlimits_0^1 left[frac{zeta(2)}x-frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}xright]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}-zeta(2)right]mathrm dx
end{align}$$
I want to point out the quite interesting one could say "almost"-symmetry of the two integrals
$$begin{align}
mathfrak{I}_1&=intlimits_0^1 left[frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}-frac{operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}x-zeta(2)right]mathrm dx\
mathfrak{I}_2&=intlimits_0^1 left[frac{zeta(2)}x-frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}xright]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}-zeta(2)right]mathrm dx
end{align}$$
which might be helpful for the actual evaluation. But from hereon I have no clue how to continue.
Just multplying the two brackets out does not seem like a good idea to me hence one the one hand it is not elegant at all and on the other hand it would lead to to the term $operatorname{Li}_2(x)operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)$ for which I have no idea how to deal with concerning the fact that I am not used to e.g. double series and their evaluation. I also tried various ways of Integration by Parts but this seems to be pointless since all variations ended up in producing a divergent term $-$ unless I have missed a sepcial choice of $u$ and $mathrm v$. I have not figured out a suitable substitution nor an appropriate newly introduced parameter $($for the application of Feynman's Trick$)$ and the I do not know whether a series expansion would be helpful or not $($connected with this issue is the possibility of a double summation with which I cannot really deal$)$.
Thus, I am asking for the closed-form evaluation of $(1)$ hopefully equal to the given value $($which works out numerically according to WolframAlpha$)$. Even though I have troubles with double series I would accept an answer invoking these notwithstanding that I would appreciate a solution without involving them. Hence this integral appeared within a collocation of Analysis Probelms I am rather sure that it has been already evaluated somewhere $($maybe even here on MSE where I was not able to find it$)$.
Thanks in advance!
integration definite-integrals closed-form riemann-zeta polylogarithm
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could the downvoter please elaborate on why he downvoted? Is my question missing some details or effort; can I add something which would make the downvote redundant?
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 16 '18 at 11:19
1
$begingroup$
I can't speak for the downvoter, but perhaps they noticed that your proposed value for $mathfrak{I}$ in equation $(1)$ is way off numerically. The correct value should be $mathfrak{I}=4,zeta{left(2right)},zeta{left(3right)}-color{red}{9},zeta{left(5right)}$.
$endgroup$
– David H
Dec 16 '18 at 12:55
$begingroup$
@David H Oh gosh. I have forgotten to write down the $9$. I will add this in the post hence it is like this within the source I have given.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 16 '18 at 13:07
1
$begingroup$
Antiderivative of begin{align}frac{1}{1-x}left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}x-zeta(2)right]end{align} is computable. This is the part corresponding to $zeta(2)zeta(3)$
$endgroup$
– FDP
Dec 16 '18 at 14:01
$begingroup$
Have you asked this on AoPS too? Or contact the author of the page?
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Jan 30 at 11:25
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
$$mathfrak{I}=intlimits_0^1 left[log(x)log(1-x)+operatorname{Li}_2(x)right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}right]mathrm dx=4zeta(2)zeta(3)-9zeta(5)tag1$$
This integral haunts me for while and I am still unable to evaluate it which annoys me even more. For the first time I have encountered it within Mathematical Analysis $-$ A collection of Problems by Tolaso J. Kos $($Page $27$, Problem $282$$)$ and I am still stumped by this one.
However, today I am have come across this question asking for the evaluation of the integral
$$mathfrak{J}=intlimits_0^{pi/2}frac{log^2(sin x)log^2(cos x)}{sin xcos x}mathrm dx=frac12zeta(5)-frac14zeta(2)zeta(3)tag2$$
Which can done be "rather simple" by invoking the fourth derivative of the Beta Function. I was baffled as I recognized the structure of the final value; moreover reminding me of the logarithmic integral $(1)$ I was not able to evaluate. It might turn out that this relation is by pure chance but nevertheless it motivated me to look at $(1)$ again. It is hardly probable that $(1)$ can be done in a similiar way like $(2)$ in xpaul's answer to the linked question due the involved Dilogarithms $-$ but anyway you can prove me wrong.
I have not got that far with $(1)$ but however I noticed two, I would say quite interesting, facts about the integral. First of all consider the following, well-known functional relation of the Dilogarithm
$$operatorname{Li}_2(x)+operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)=zeta(2)-log(x)log(1-x)$$
which can be used in order to get rid of the $log(x)log(1-x)$-term within $(1)$ and leading to
$$smallintlimits_0^1 left[log(x)log(1-x)+operatorname{Li}_2(x)right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}right]mathrm dx=intlimits_0^1 left[zeta(2)-operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}right]mathrm dx$$
Secondly applying the subsititution $x=1-x$ after a minor reshape yields to
$$smallbegin{align}
intlimits_0^1 left[zeta(2)-operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}right]mathrm dx&=intlimits_0^1 left[frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}-frac{operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}x-zeta(2)right]mathrm dx\
&=intlimits_0^1 left[zeta(2)-operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}x-zeta(2)right]frac{mathrm dx}{1-x}\
&=intlimits_0^1 left[zeta(2)-operatorname{Li}_2(x)right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}-zeta(2)right]frac{mathrm dx}x\
&=intlimits_0^1 left[frac{zeta(2)}x-frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}xright]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}-zeta(2)right]mathrm dx
end{align}$$
I want to point out the quite interesting one could say "almost"-symmetry of the two integrals
$$begin{align}
mathfrak{I}_1&=intlimits_0^1 left[frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}-frac{operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}x-zeta(2)right]mathrm dx\
mathfrak{I}_2&=intlimits_0^1 left[frac{zeta(2)}x-frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}xright]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}-zeta(2)right]mathrm dx
end{align}$$
which might be helpful for the actual evaluation. But from hereon I have no clue how to continue.
Just multplying the two brackets out does not seem like a good idea to me hence one the one hand it is not elegant at all and on the other hand it would lead to to the term $operatorname{Li}_2(x)operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)$ for which I have no idea how to deal with concerning the fact that I am not used to e.g. double series and their evaluation. I also tried various ways of Integration by Parts but this seems to be pointless since all variations ended up in producing a divergent term $-$ unless I have missed a sepcial choice of $u$ and $mathrm v$. I have not figured out a suitable substitution nor an appropriate newly introduced parameter $($for the application of Feynman's Trick$)$ and the I do not know whether a series expansion would be helpful or not $($connected with this issue is the possibility of a double summation with which I cannot really deal$)$.
Thus, I am asking for the closed-form evaluation of $(1)$ hopefully equal to the given value $($which works out numerically according to WolframAlpha$)$. Even though I have troubles with double series I would accept an answer invoking these notwithstanding that I would appreciate a solution without involving them. Hence this integral appeared within a collocation of Analysis Probelms I am rather sure that it has been already evaluated somewhere $($maybe even here on MSE where I was not able to find it$)$.
Thanks in advance!
integration definite-integrals closed-form riemann-zeta polylogarithm
$endgroup$
$$mathfrak{I}=intlimits_0^1 left[log(x)log(1-x)+operatorname{Li}_2(x)right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}right]mathrm dx=4zeta(2)zeta(3)-9zeta(5)tag1$$
This integral haunts me for while and I am still unable to evaluate it which annoys me even more. For the first time I have encountered it within Mathematical Analysis $-$ A collection of Problems by Tolaso J. Kos $($Page $27$, Problem $282$$)$ and I am still stumped by this one.
However, today I am have come across this question asking for the evaluation of the integral
$$mathfrak{J}=intlimits_0^{pi/2}frac{log^2(sin x)log^2(cos x)}{sin xcos x}mathrm dx=frac12zeta(5)-frac14zeta(2)zeta(3)tag2$$
Which can done be "rather simple" by invoking the fourth derivative of the Beta Function. I was baffled as I recognized the structure of the final value; moreover reminding me of the logarithmic integral $(1)$ I was not able to evaluate. It might turn out that this relation is by pure chance but nevertheless it motivated me to look at $(1)$ again. It is hardly probable that $(1)$ can be done in a similiar way like $(2)$ in xpaul's answer to the linked question due the involved Dilogarithms $-$ but anyway you can prove me wrong.
I have not got that far with $(1)$ but however I noticed two, I would say quite interesting, facts about the integral. First of all consider the following, well-known functional relation of the Dilogarithm
$$operatorname{Li}_2(x)+operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)=zeta(2)-log(x)log(1-x)$$
which can be used in order to get rid of the $log(x)log(1-x)$-term within $(1)$ and leading to
$$smallintlimits_0^1 left[log(x)log(1-x)+operatorname{Li}_2(x)right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}right]mathrm dx=intlimits_0^1 left[zeta(2)-operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}right]mathrm dx$$
Secondly applying the subsititution $x=1-x$ after a minor reshape yields to
$$smallbegin{align}
intlimits_0^1 left[zeta(2)-operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}right]mathrm dx&=intlimits_0^1 left[frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}-frac{operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}x-zeta(2)right]mathrm dx\
&=intlimits_0^1 left[zeta(2)-operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}x-zeta(2)right]frac{mathrm dx}{1-x}\
&=intlimits_0^1 left[zeta(2)-operatorname{Li}_2(x)right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}-zeta(2)right]frac{mathrm dx}x\
&=intlimits_0^1 left[frac{zeta(2)}x-frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}xright]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}-zeta(2)right]mathrm dx
end{align}$$
I want to point out the quite interesting one could say "almost"-symmetry of the two integrals
$$begin{align}
mathfrak{I}_1&=intlimits_0^1 left[frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}-frac{operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}right]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}x-zeta(2)right]mathrm dx\
mathfrak{I}_2&=intlimits_0^1 left[frac{zeta(2)}x-frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}xright]left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}-zeta(2)right]mathrm dx
end{align}$$
which might be helpful for the actual evaluation. But from hereon I have no clue how to continue.
Just multplying the two brackets out does not seem like a good idea to me hence one the one hand it is not elegant at all and on the other hand it would lead to to the term $operatorname{Li}_2(x)operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)$ for which I have no idea how to deal with concerning the fact that I am not used to e.g. double series and their evaluation. I also tried various ways of Integration by Parts but this seems to be pointless since all variations ended up in producing a divergent term $-$ unless I have missed a sepcial choice of $u$ and $mathrm v$. I have not figured out a suitable substitution nor an appropriate newly introduced parameter $($for the application of Feynman's Trick$)$ and the I do not know whether a series expansion would be helpful or not $($connected with this issue is the possibility of a double summation with which I cannot really deal$)$.
Thus, I am asking for the closed-form evaluation of $(1)$ hopefully equal to the given value $($which works out numerically according to WolframAlpha$)$. Even though I have troubles with double series I would accept an answer invoking these notwithstanding that I would appreciate a solution without involving them. Hence this integral appeared within a collocation of Analysis Probelms I am rather sure that it has been already evaluated somewhere $($maybe even here on MSE where I was not able to find it$)$.
Thanks in advance!
integration definite-integrals closed-form riemann-zeta polylogarithm
integration definite-integrals closed-form riemann-zeta polylogarithm
edited Feb 19 at 6:24
mrtaurho
asked Dec 14 '18 at 21:01
mrtaurhomrtaurho
5,65051540
5,65051540
$begingroup$
Could the downvoter please elaborate on why he downvoted? Is my question missing some details or effort; can I add something which would make the downvote redundant?
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 16 '18 at 11:19
1
$begingroup$
I can't speak for the downvoter, but perhaps they noticed that your proposed value for $mathfrak{I}$ in equation $(1)$ is way off numerically. The correct value should be $mathfrak{I}=4,zeta{left(2right)},zeta{left(3right)}-color{red}{9},zeta{left(5right)}$.
$endgroup$
– David H
Dec 16 '18 at 12:55
$begingroup$
@David H Oh gosh. I have forgotten to write down the $9$. I will add this in the post hence it is like this within the source I have given.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 16 '18 at 13:07
1
$begingroup$
Antiderivative of begin{align}frac{1}{1-x}left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}x-zeta(2)right]end{align} is computable. This is the part corresponding to $zeta(2)zeta(3)$
$endgroup$
– FDP
Dec 16 '18 at 14:01
$begingroup$
Have you asked this on AoPS too? Or contact the author of the page?
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Jan 30 at 11:25
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Could the downvoter please elaborate on why he downvoted? Is my question missing some details or effort; can I add something which would make the downvote redundant?
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 16 '18 at 11:19
1
$begingroup$
I can't speak for the downvoter, but perhaps they noticed that your proposed value for $mathfrak{I}$ in equation $(1)$ is way off numerically. The correct value should be $mathfrak{I}=4,zeta{left(2right)},zeta{left(3right)}-color{red}{9},zeta{left(5right)}$.
$endgroup$
– David H
Dec 16 '18 at 12:55
$begingroup$
@David H Oh gosh. I have forgotten to write down the $9$. I will add this in the post hence it is like this within the source I have given.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 16 '18 at 13:07
1
$begingroup$
Antiderivative of begin{align}frac{1}{1-x}left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}x-zeta(2)right]end{align} is computable. This is the part corresponding to $zeta(2)zeta(3)$
$endgroup$
– FDP
Dec 16 '18 at 14:01
$begingroup$
Have you asked this on AoPS too? Or contact the author of the page?
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Jan 30 at 11:25
$begingroup$
Could the downvoter please elaborate on why he downvoted? Is my question missing some details or effort; can I add something which would make the downvote redundant?
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 16 '18 at 11:19
$begingroup$
Could the downvoter please elaborate on why he downvoted? Is my question missing some details or effort; can I add something which would make the downvote redundant?
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 16 '18 at 11:19
1
1
$begingroup$
I can't speak for the downvoter, but perhaps they noticed that your proposed value for $mathfrak{I}$ in equation $(1)$ is way off numerically. The correct value should be $mathfrak{I}=4,zeta{left(2right)},zeta{left(3right)}-color{red}{9},zeta{left(5right)}$.
$endgroup$
– David H
Dec 16 '18 at 12:55
$begingroup$
I can't speak for the downvoter, but perhaps they noticed that your proposed value for $mathfrak{I}$ in equation $(1)$ is way off numerically. The correct value should be $mathfrak{I}=4,zeta{left(2right)},zeta{left(3right)}-color{red}{9},zeta{left(5right)}$.
$endgroup$
– David H
Dec 16 '18 at 12:55
$begingroup$
@David H Oh gosh. I have forgotten to write down the $9$. I will add this in the post hence it is like this within the source I have given.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 16 '18 at 13:07
$begingroup$
@David H Oh gosh. I have forgotten to write down the $9$. I will add this in the post hence it is like this within the source I have given.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 16 '18 at 13:07
1
1
$begingroup$
Antiderivative of begin{align}frac{1}{1-x}left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}x-zeta(2)right]end{align} is computable. This is the part corresponding to $zeta(2)zeta(3)$
$endgroup$
– FDP
Dec 16 '18 at 14:01
$begingroup$
Antiderivative of begin{align}frac{1}{1-x}left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}x-zeta(2)right]end{align} is computable. This is the part corresponding to $zeta(2)zeta(3)$
$endgroup$
– FDP
Dec 16 '18 at 14:01
$begingroup$
Have you asked this on AoPS too? Or contact the author of the page?
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Jan 30 at 11:25
$begingroup$
Have you asked this on AoPS too? Or contact the author of the page?
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Jan 30 at 11:25
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Cross-posting this integral on AoPS brings Y. Sharifi's solution here after a day. Quite amazing one!
I will copy here his entire solution:
Let $I$ be your integral. Using the identity $ln x ln(1-x)+text{Li}_2(x)=zeta(2)-text{Li}_2(1-x),$ we have
$$I=-int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)text{Li}_2(1-x)}{x(1-x)} dx + zeta(2)int_0^1 left(frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}+frac{text{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}right)dx.$$
Let
$$J=int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)text{Li}_2(1-x)}{x(1-x)} dx, K:=int_0^1 left(frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}+frac{text{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}right)dx.$$
So
$$I=zeta(2)K - J. (1)$$
We first show that $K=0.$ Start with using integration by parts in $K,$ with $u=frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x}-zeta(2)+text{Li}_2(1-x)$ and $dv=frac{dx}{1-x}.$ Then
$$K=int_0^1 ln(1-x)left(frac{ln x}{1-x}-frac{ln(1-x)}{x^2}-frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x^2}right)dx. (2)$$
Using the Maclaurin series of $ln(1-x),$ we quickly find the first integral in $K$
$$int_0^1 frac{ln x ln(1-x)}{1-x} dx = int_0^1 frac{ln x ln(1-x)}{x} dx=zeta(3). (3)$$
Next, we ignore the second integral in $K$ for now and we look at the third one, i.e. $int_0^1 frac{ln(1-x) text{Li}_2(x)}{x^2} dx.$ In this integral, we use integration by parts with $u=ln(1-x)text{Li}_2(x)$ and $dv=frac{dx}{x^2};$ notice that we need to choose $v=1-frac{1}{x}.$ So
$$int_0^1 frac{ln(1-x) text{Li}_2(x)}{x^2} dx=int_0^1left(1-frac{1}{x}right)left(frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{1-x}+frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x}right) dx$$
$$=-int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x} dx + int_0^1 frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x} dx - int_0^1 frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x^2} dx=-zeta(3)+int_0^1 frac{ln^2x}{1-x} dx -int_0^1 frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x^2} dx.$$
$$=zeta(3)-int_0^1 frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x^2} dx. (4)$$
Thus, by $(2),(3)$ and $(4),$ we have $K=0$ and hence, by $(1),$
$$I=-J=-int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)text{Li}_2(1-x)}{x(1-x)} dx=-2int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)text{Li}_2(1-x)}{x} dx.$$
So integration by parts with $u=text{Li}_2(1-x)$ and $dv=frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x} dx$ gives
$$I=2int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_3(x)ln x}{1-x} dx=2int_0^1 text{Li}_3(x) ln x sum_{m ge 1}x^{m-1} dx=2sum_{m ge 1} int_0^1 x^{m-1}text{Li}_3(x) ln x dx$$
$$=2sum_{m ge 1} int_0^1x^{m-1}sum_{n ge 1} frac{x^n}{n^3} ln x dx=2sum_{m,n ge 1} frac{1}{n^3}int_0^1x^{n+m-1}ln x dx=-2sum_{m,n ge 1} frac{1}{n^3(n+m)^2}$$
$$=-sum_{m,n ge 1} left(frac{1}{n^3(n+m)^2}+frac{1}{m^3(n+m)^2}right). (5)$$
So $(5)$ and the following identity
$$frac{1}{n^3(n+m)^2}+frac{1}{m^3(n+m)^2}=frac{1}{n^3m^2}-frac{2}{n^2m^3}+frac{3}{m^3n(n+m)}$$
together give
$$I=-sum_{m,n ge 1}left(frac{1}{n^3m^2}-frac{2}{n^2m^3}+frac{3}{m^3n(n+m)}right)=zeta(2)zeta(3)-3sum_{m,n ge 1} frac{1}{m^3n(n+m)}$$
$$=zeta(2)zeta(3)-3sum_{m ge 1} frac{1}{m^4} sum_{n ge 1}left(frac{1}{n}-frac{1}{n+m}right)=zeta(2)zeta(3)-3sum_{m ge 1} frac{H_m}{m^4}, (6)$$
where, as usual, $H_m:=sum_{j=1}^m frac{1}{j}$ is the $m$-th harmonic number. Now we use Euler's formula
$$sum_{m ge 1} frac{H_m}{m^k}=left(1+frac{k}{2}right)zeta(k+1)-frac{1}{2}sum_{i=1}^{k-2}zeta(i+1)zeta(k-i), k ge 2,$$
with $k=4$ to get
$$sum_{m ge 1} frac{H_m}{m^4}=3zeta(5)-zeta(2)zeta(3)$$
and so, by $(6),$
$$I=zeta(2)zeta(3)-3(3zeta(5)-zeta(2)zeta(3))=4zeta(2)zeta(3)-9zeta(5).$$
Edit.
This integral was proposed two years ago in RMM and it appeared as problem UP $089$.
See in this link, at the page $70$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I am surprised over and over again by his ability of evaluating different and complex integrals. It always seems so easy seeing his approach but I could have never come up with this by myself! However, thank you for cross posting the question on AoPS, I already gave him a thumps up there, and for sharing ysharifi's solution here. Anyway I am feeling a little bit uneasy about the extensive usage of double sums in the end even though there are quite simple in this case.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 31 at 14:16
1
$begingroup$
@mrtaurho I have found it in RMM and linked it.
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Feb 2 at 14:07
1
$begingroup$
Wonderful! Thank you for your time and effort.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Feb 2 at 14:11
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039874%2fevaluate-int-limits-01-logx-log1-x-operatornameli-2x-left-frac-o%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Cross-posting this integral on AoPS brings Y. Sharifi's solution here after a day. Quite amazing one!
I will copy here his entire solution:
Let $I$ be your integral. Using the identity $ln x ln(1-x)+text{Li}_2(x)=zeta(2)-text{Li}_2(1-x),$ we have
$$I=-int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)text{Li}_2(1-x)}{x(1-x)} dx + zeta(2)int_0^1 left(frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}+frac{text{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}right)dx.$$
Let
$$J=int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)text{Li}_2(1-x)}{x(1-x)} dx, K:=int_0^1 left(frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}+frac{text{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}right)dx.$$
So
$$I=zeta(2)K - J. (1)$$
We first show that $K=0.$ Start with using integration by parts in $K,$ with $u=frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x}-zeta(2)+text{Li}_2(1-x)$ and $dv=frac{dx}{1-x}.$ Then
$$K=int_0^1 ln(1-x)left(frac{ln x}{1-x}-frac{ln(1-x)}{x^2}-frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x^2}right)dx. (2)$$
Using the Maclaurin series of $ln(1-x),$ we quickly find the first integral in $K$
$$int_0^1 frac{ln x ln(1-x)}{1-x} dx = int_0^1 frac{ln x ln(1-x)}{x} dx=zeta(3). (3)$$
Next, we ignore the second integral in $K$ for now and we look at the third one, i.e. $int_0^1 frac{ln(1-x) text{Li}_2(x)}{x^2} dx.$ In this integral, we use integration by parts with $u=ln(1-x)text{Li}_2(x)$ and $dv=frac{dx}{x^2};$ notice that we need to choose $v=1-frac{1}{x}.$ So
$$int_0^1 frac{ln(1-x) text{Li}_2(x)}{x^2} dx=int_0^1left(1-frac{1}{x}right)left(frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{1-x}+frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x}right) dx$$
$$=-int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x} dx + int_0^1 frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x} dx - int_0^1 frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x^2} dx=-zeta(3)+int_0^1 frac{ln^2x}{1-x} dx -int_0^1 frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x^2} dx.$$
$$=zeta(3)-int_0^1 frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x^2} dx. (4)$$
Thus, by $(2),(3)$ and $(4),$ we have $K=0$ and hence, by $(1),$
$$I=-J=-int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)text{Li}_2(1-x)}{x(1-x)} dx=-2int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)text{Li}_2(1-x)}{x} dx.$$
So integration by parts with $u=text{Li}_2(1-x)$ and $dv=frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x} dx$ gives
$$I=2int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_3(x)ln x}{1-x} dx=2int_0^1 text{Li}_3(x) ln x sum_{m ge 1}x^{m-1} dx=2sum_{m ge 1} int_0^1 x^{m-1}text{Li}_3(x) ln x dx$$
$$=2sum_{m ge 1} int_0^1x^{m-1}sum_{n ge 1} frac{x^n}{n^3} ln x dx=2sum_{m,n ge 1} frac{1}{n^3}int_0^1x^{n+m-1}ln x dx=-2sum_{m,n ge 1} frac{1}{n^3(n+m)^2}$$
$$=-sum_{m,n ge 1} left(frac{1}{n^3(n+m)^2}+frac{1}{m^3(n+m)^2}right). (5)$$
So $(5)$ and the following identity
$$frac{1}{n^3(n+m)^2}+frac{1}{m^3(n+m)^2}=frac{1}{n^3m^2}-frac{2}{n^2m^3}+frac{3}{m^3n(n+m)}$$
together give
$$I=-sum_{m,n ge 1}left(frac{1}{n^3m^2}-frac{2}{n^2m^3}+frac{3}{m^3n(n+m)}right)=zeta(2)zeta(3)-3sum_{m,n ge 1} frac{1}{m^3n(n+m)}$$
$$=zeta(2)zeta(3)-3sum_{m ge 1} frac{1}{m^4} sum_{n ge 1}left(frac{1}{n}-frac{1}{n+m}right)=zeta(2)zeta(3)-3sum_{m ge 1} frac{H_m}{m^4}, (6)$$
where, as usual, $H_m:=sum_{j=1}^m frac{1}{j}$ is the $m$-th harmonic number. Now we use Euler's formula
$$sum_{m ge 1} frac{H_m}{m^k}=left(1+frac{k}{2}right)zeta(k+1)-frac{1}{2}sum_{i=1}^{k-2}zeta(i+1)zeta(k-i), k ge 2,$$
with $k=4$ to get
$$sum_{m ge 1} frac{H_m}{m^4}=3zeta(5)-zeta(2)zeta(3)$$
and so, by $(6),$
$$I=zeta(2)zeta(3)-3(3zeta(5)-zeta(2)zeta(3))=4zeta(2)zeta(3)-9zeta(5).$$
Edit.
This integral was proposed two years ago in RMM and it appeared as problem UP $089$.
See in this link, at the page $70$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I am surprised over and over again by his ability of evaluating different and complex integrals. It always seems so easy seeing his approach but I could have never come up with this by myself! However, thank you for cross posting the question on AoPS, I already gave him a thumps up there, and for sharing ysharifi's solution here. Anyway I am feeling a little bit uneasy about the extensive usage of double sums in the end even though there are quite simple in this case.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 31 at 14:16
1
$begingroup$
@mrtaurho I have found it in RMM and linked it.
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Feb 2 at 14:07
1
$begingroup$
Wonderful! Thank you for your time and effort.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Feb 2 at 14:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Cross-posting this integral on AoPS brings Y. Sharifi's solution here after a day. Quite amazing one!
I will copy here his entire solution:
Let $I$ be your integral. Using the identity $ln x ln(1-x)+text{Li}_2(x)=zeta(2)-text{Li}_2(1-x),$ we have
$$I=-int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)text{Li}_2(1-x)}{x(1-x)} dx + zeta(2)int_0^1 left(frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}+frac{text{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}right)dx.$$
Let
$$J=int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)text{Li}_2(1-x)}{x(1-x)} dx, K:=int_0^1 left(frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}+frac{text{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}right)dx.$$
So
$$I=zeta(2)K - J. (1)$$
We first show that $K=0.$ Start with using integration by parts in $K,$ with $u=frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x}-zeta(2)+text{Li}_2(1-x)$ and $dv=frac{dx}{1-x}.$ Then
$$K=int_0^1 ln(1-x)left(frac{ln x}{1-x}-frac{ln(1-x)}{x^2}-frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x^2}right)dx. (2)$$
Using the Maclaurin series of $ln(1-x),$ we quickly find the first integral in $K$
$$int_0^1 frac{ln x ln(1-x)}{1-x} dx = int_0^1 frac{ln x ln(1-x)}{x} dx=zeta(3). (3)$$
Next, we ignore the second integral in $K$ for now and we look at the third one, i.e. $int_0^1 frac{ln(1-x) text{Li}_2(x)}{x^2} dx.$ In this integral, we use integration by parts with $u=ln(1-x)text{Li}_2(x)$ and $dv=frac{dx}{x^2};$ notice that we need to choose $v=1-frac{1}{x}.$ So
$$int_0^1 frac{ln(1-x) text{Li}_2(x)}{x^2} dx=int_0^1left(1-frac{1}{x}right)left(frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{1-x}+frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x}right) dx$$
$$=-int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x} dx + int_0^1 frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x} dx - int_0^1 frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x^2} dx=-zeta(3)+int_0^1 frac{ln^2x}{1-x} dx -int_0^1 frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x^2} dx.$$
$$=zeta(3)-int_0^1 frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x^2} dx. (4)$$
Thus, by $(2),(3)$ and $(4),$ we have $K=0$ and hence, by $(1),$
$$I=-J=-int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)text{Li}_2(1-x)}{x(1-x)} dx=-2int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)text{Li}_2(1-x)}{x} dx.$$
So integration by parts with $u=text{Li}_2(1-x)$ and $dv=frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x} dx$ gives
$$I=2int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_3(x)ln x}{1-x} dx=2int_0^1 text{Li}_3(x) ln x sum_{m ge 1}x^{m-1} dx=2sum_{m ge 1} int_0^1 x^{m-1}text{Li}_3(x) ln x dx$$
$$=2sum_{m ge 1} int_0^1x^{m-1}sum_{n ge 1} frac{x^n}{n^3} ln x dx=2sum_{m,n ge 1} frac{1}{n^3}int_0^1x^{n+m-1}ln x dx=-2sum_{m,n ge 1} frac{1}{n^3(n+m)^2}$$
$$=-sum_{m,n ge 1} left(frac{1}{n^3(n+m)^2}+frac{1}{m^3(n+m)^2}right). (5)$$
So $(5)$ and the following identity
$$frac{1}{n^3(n+m)^2}+frac{1}{m^3(n+m)^2}=frac{1}{n^3m^2}-frac{2}{n^2m^3}+frac{3}{m^3n(n+m)}$$
together give
$$I=-sum_{m,n ge 1}left(frac{1}{n^3m^2}-frac{2}{n^2m^3}+frac{3}{m^3n(n+m)}right)=zeta(2)zeta(3)-3sum_{m,n ge 1} frac{1}{m^3n(n+m)}$$
$$=zeta(2)zeta(3)-3sum_{m ge 1} frac{1}{m^4} sum_{n ge 1}left(frac{1}{n}-frac{1}{n+m}right)=zeta(2)zeta(3)-3sum_{m ge 1} frac{H_m}{m^4}, (6)$$
where, as usual, $H_m:=sum_{j=1}^m frac{1}{j}$ is the $m$-th harmonic number. Now we use Euler's formula
$$sum_{m ge 1} frac{H_m}{m^k}=left(1+frac{k}{2}right)zeta(k+1)-frac{1}{2}sum_{i=1}^{k-2}zeta(i+1)zeta(k-i), k ge 2,$$
with $k=4$ to get
$$sum_{m ge 1} frac{H_m}{m^4}=3zeta(5)-zeta(2)zeta(3)$$
and so, by $(6),$
$$I=zeta(2)zeta(3)-3(3zeta(5)-zeta(2)zeta(3))=4zeta(2)zeta(3)-9zeta(5).$$
Edit.
This integral was proposed two years ago in RMM and it appeared as problem UP $089$.
See in this link, at the page $70$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I am surprised over and over again by his ability of evaluating different and complex integrals. It always seems so easy seeing his approach but I could have never come up with this by myself! However, thank you for cross posting the question on AoPS, I already gave him a thumps up there, and for sharing ysharifi's solution here. Anyway I am feeling a little bit uneasy about the extensive usage of double sums in the end even though there are quite simple in this case.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 31 at 14:16
1
$begingroup$
@mrtaurho I have found it in RMM and linked it.
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Feb 2 at 14:07
1
$begingroup$
Wonderful! Thank you for your time and effort.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Feb 2 at 14:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Cross-posting this integral on AoPS brings Y. Sharifi's solution here after a day. Quite amazing one!
I will copy here his entire solution:
Let $I$ be your integral. Using the identity $ln x ln(1-x)+text{Li}_2(x)=zeta(2)-text{Li}_2(1-x),$ we have
$$I=-int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)text{Li}_2(1-x)}{x(1-x)} dx + zeta(2)int_0^1 left(frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}+frac{text{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}right)dx.$$
Let
$$J=int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)text{Li}_2(1-x)}{x(1-x)} dx, K:=int_0^1 left(frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}+frac{text{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}right)dx.$$
So
$$I=zeta(2)K - J. (1)$$
We first show that $K=0.$ Start with using integration by parts in $K,$ with $u=frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x}-zeta(2)+text{Li}_2(1-x)$ and $dv=frac{dx}{1-x}.$ Then
$$K=int_0^1 ln(1-x)left(frac{ln x}{1-x}-frac{ln(1-x)}{x^2}-frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x^2}right)dx. (2)$$
Using the Maclaurin series of $ln(1-x),$ we quickly find the first integral in $K$
$$int_0^1 frac{ln x ln(1-x)}{1-x} dx = int_0^1 frac{ln x ln(1-x)}{x} dx=zeta(3). (3)$$
Next, we ignore the second integral in $K$ for now and we look at the third one, i.e. $int_0^1 frac{ln(1-x) text{Li}_2(x)}{x^2} dx.$ In this integral, we use integration by parts with $u=ln(1-x)text{Li}_2(x)$ and $dv=frac{dx}{x^2};$ notice that we need to choose $v=1-frac{1}{x}.$ So
$$int_0^1 frac{ln(1-x) text{Li}_2(x)}{x^2} dx=int_0^1left(1-frac{1}{x}right)left(frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{1-x}+frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x}right) dx$$
$$=-int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x} dx + int_0^1 frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x} dx - int_0^1 frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x^2} dx=-zeta(3)+int_0^1 frac{ln^2x}{1-x} dx -int_0^1 frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x^2} dx.$$
$$=zeta(3)-int_0^1 frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x^2} dx. (4)$$
Thus, by $(2),(3)$ and $(4),$ we have $K=0$ and hence, by $(1),$
$$I=-J=-int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)text{Li}_2(1-x)}{x(1-x)} dx=-2int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)text{Li}_2(1-x)}{x} dx.$$
So integration by parts with $u=text{Li}_2(1-x)$ and $dv=frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x} dx$ gives
$$I=2int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_3(x)ln x}{1-x} dx=2int_0^1 text{Li}_3(x) ln x sum_{m ge 1}x^{m-1} dx=2sum_{m ge 1} int_0^1 x^{m-1}text{Li}_3(x) ln x dx$$
$$=2sum_{m ge 1} int_0^1x^{m-1}sum_{n ge 1} frac{x^n}{n^3} ln x dx=2sum_{m,n ge 1} frac{1}{n^3}int_0^1x^{n+m-1}ln x dx=-2sum_{m,n ge 1} frac{1}{n^3(n+m)^2}$$
$$=-sum_{m,n ge 1} left(frac{1}{n^3(n+m)^2}+frac{1}{m^3(n+m)^2}right). (5)$$
So $(5)$ and the following identity
$$frac{1}{n^3(n+m)^2}+frac{1}{m^3(n+m)^2}=frac{1}{n^3m^2}-frac{2}{n^2m^3}+frac{3}{m^3n(n+m)}$$
together give
$$I=-sum_{m,n ge 1}left(frac{1}{n^3m^2}-frac{2}{n^2m^3}+frac{3}{m^3n(n+m)}right)=zeta(2)zeta(3)-3sum_{m,n ge 1} frac{1}{m^3n(n+m)}$$
$$=zeta(2)zeta(3)-3sum_{m ge 1} frac{1}{m^4} sum_{n ge 1}left(frac{1}{n}-frac{1}{n+m}right)=zeta(2)zeta(3)-3sum_{m ge 1} frac{H_m}{m^4}, (6)$$
where, as usual, $H_m:=sum_{j=1}^m frac{1}{j}$ is the $m$-th harmonic number. Now we use Euler's formula
$$sum_{m ge 1} frac{H_m}{m^k}=left(1+frac{k}{2}right)zeta(k+1)-frac{1}{2}sum_{i=1}^{k-2}zeta(i+1)zeta(k-i), k ge 2,$$
with $k=4$ to get
$$sum_{m ge 1} frac{H_m}{m^4}=3zeta(5)-zeta(2)zeta(3)$$
and so, by $(6),$
$$I=zeta(2)zeta(3)-3(3zeta(5)-zeta(2)zeta(3))=4zeta(2)zeta(3)-9zeta(5).$$
Edit.
This integral was proposed two years ago in RMM and it appeared as problem UP $089$.
See in this link, at the page $70$.
$endgroup$
Cross-posting this integral on AoPS brings Y. Sharifi's solution here after a day. Quite amazing one!
I will copy here his entire solution:
Let $I$ be your integral. Using the identity $ln x ln(1-x)+text{Li}_2(x)=zeta(2)-text{Li}_2(1-x),$ we have
$$I=-int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)text{Li}_2(1-x)}{x(1-x)} dx + zeta(2)int_0^1 left(frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}+frac{text{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}right)dx.$$
Let
$$J=int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)text{Li}_2(1-x)}{x(1-x)} dx, K:=int_0^1 left(frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x(1-x)}-frac{zeta(2)}{1-x}+frac{text{Li}_2(1-x)}{1-x}right)dx.$$
So
$$I=zeta(2)K - J. (1)$$
We first show that $K=0.$ Start with using integration by parts in $K,$ with $u=frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x}-zeta(2)+text{Li}_2(1-x)$ and $dv=frac{dx}{1-x}.$ Then
$$K=int_0^1 ln(1-x)left(frac{ln x}{1-x}-frac{ln(1-x)}{x^2}-frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x^2}right)dx. (2)$$
Using the Maclaurin series of $ln(1-x),$ we quickly find the first integral in $K$
$$int_0^1 frac{ln x ln(1-x)}{1-x} dx = int_0^1 frac{ln x ln(1-x)}{x} dx=zeta(3). (3)$$
Next, we ignore the second integral in $K$ for now and we look at the third one, i.e. $int_0^1 frac{ln(1-x) text{Li}_2(x)}{x^2} dx.$ In this integral, we use integration by parts with $u=ln(1-x)text{Li}_2(x)$ and $dv=frac{dx}{x^2};$ notice that we need to choose $v=1-frac{1}{x}.$ So
$$int_0^1 frac{ln(1-x) text{Li}_2(x)}{x^2} dx=int_0^1left(1-frac{1}{x}right)left(frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{1-x}+frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x}right) dx$$
$$=-int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x} dx + int_0^1 frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x} dx - int_0^1 frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x^2} dx=-zeta(3)+int_0^1 frac{ln^2x}{1-x} dx -int_0^1 frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x^2} dx.$$
$$=zeta(3)-int_0^1 frac{ln^2(1-x)}{x^2} dx. (4)$$
Thus, by $(2),(3)$ and $(4),$ we have $K=0$ and hence, by $(1),$
$$I=-J=-int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)text{Li}_2(1-x)}{x(1-x)} dx=-2int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_2(x)text{Li}_2(1-x)}{x} dx.$$
So integration by parts with $u=text{Li}_2(1-x)$ and $dv=frac{text{Li}_2(x)}{x} dx$ gives
$$I=2int_0^1 frac{text{Li}_3(x)ln x}{1-x} dx=2int_0^1 text{Li}_3(x) ln x sum_{m ge 1}x^{m-1} dx=2sum_{m ge 1} int_0^1 x^{m-1}text{Li}_3(x) ln x dx$$
$$=2sum_{m ge 1} int_0^1x^{m-1}sum_{n ge 1} frac{x^n}{n^3} ln x dx=2sum_{m,n ge 1} frac{1}{n^3}int_0^1x^{n+m-1}ln x dx=-2sum_{m,n ge 1} frac{1}{n^3(n+m)^2}$$
$$=-sum_{m,n ge 1} left(frac{1}{n^3(n+m)^2}+frac{1}{m^3(n+m)^2}right). (5)$$
So $(5)$ and the following identity
$$frac{1}{n^3(n+m)^2}+frac{1}{m^3(n+m)^2}=frac{1}{n^3m^2}-frac{2}{n^2m^3}+frac{3}{m^3n(n+m)}$$
together give
$$I=-sum_{m,n ge 1}left(frac{1}{n^3m^2}-frac{2}{n^2m^3}+frac{3}{m^3n(n+m)}right)=zeta(2)zeta(3)-3sum_{m,n ge 1} frac{1}{m^3n(n+m)}$$
$$=zeta(2)zeta(3)-3sum_{m ge 1} frac{1}{m^4} sum_{n ge 1}left(frac{1}{n}-frac{1}{n+m}right)=zeta(2)zeta(3)-3sum_{m ge 1} frac{H_m}{m^4}, (6)$$
where, as usual, $H_m:=sum_{j=1}^m frac{1}{j}$ is the $m$-th harmonic number. Now we use Euler's formula
$$sum_{m ge 1} frac{H_m}{m^k}=left(1+frac{k}{2}right)zeta(k+1)-frac{1}{2}sum_{i=1}^{k-2}zeta(i+1)zeta(k-i), k ge 2,$$
with $k=4$ to get
$$sum_{m ge 1} frac{H_m}{m^4}=3zeta(5)-zeta(2)zeta(3)$$
and so, by $(6),$
$$I=zeta(2)zeta(3)-3(3zeta(5)-zeta(2)zeta(3))=4zeta(2)zeta(3)-9zeta(5).$$
Edit.
This integral was proposed two years ago in RMM and it appeared as problem UP $089$.
See in this link, at the page $70$.
edited Feb 2 at 14:07
answered Jan 31 at 13:32
ZackyZacky
7,4301961
7,4301961
1
$begingroup$
I am surprised over and over again by his ability of evaluating different and complex integrals. It always seems so easy seeing his approach but I could have never come up with this by myself! However, thank you for cross posting the question on AoPS, I already gave him a thumps up there, and for sharing ysharifi's solution here. Anyway I am feeling a little bit uneasy about the extensive usage of double sums in the end even though there are quite simple in this case.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 31 at 14:16
1
$begingroup$
@mrtaurho I have found it in RMM and linked it.
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Feb 2 at 14:07
1
$begingroup$
Wonderful! Thank you for your time and effort.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Feb 2 at 14:11
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
I am surprised over and over again by his ability of evaluating different and complex integrals. It always seems so easy seeing his approach but I could have never come up with this by myself! However, thank you for cross posting the question on AoPS, I already gave him a thumps up there, and for sharing ysharifi's solution here. Anyway I am feeling a little bit uneasy about the extensive usage of double sums in the end even though there are quite simple in this case.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 31 at 14:16
1
$begingroup$
@mrtaurho I have found it in RMM and linked it.
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Feb 2 at 14:07
1
$begingroup$
Wonderful! Thank you for your time and effort.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Feb 2 at 14:11
1
1
$begingroup$
I am surprised over and over again by his ability of evaluating different and complex integrals. It always seems so easy seeing his approach but I could have never come up with this by myself! However, thank you for cross posting the question on AoPS, I already gave him a thumps up there, and for sharing ysharifi's solution here. Anyway I am feeling a little bit uneasy about the extensive usage of double sums in the end even though there are quite simple in this case.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 31 at 14:16
$begingroup$
I am surprised over and over again by his ability of evaluating different and complex integrals. It always seems so easy seeing his approach but I could have never come up with this by myself! However, thank you for cross posting the question on AoPS, I already gave him a thumps up there, and for sharing ysharifi's solution here. Anyway I am feeling a little bit uneasy about the extensive usage of double sums in the end even though there are quite simple in this case.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 31 at 14:16
1
1
$begingroup$
@mrtaurho I have found it in RMM and linked it.
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Feb 2 at 14:07
$begingroup$
@mrtaurho I have found it in RMM and linked it.
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Feb 2 at 14:07
1
1
$begingroup$
Wonderful! Thank you for your time and effort.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Feb 2 at 14:11
$begingroup$
Wonderful! Thank you for your time and effort.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Feb 2 at 14:11
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039874%2fevaluate-int-limits-01-logx-log1-x-operatornameli-2x-left-frac-o%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Could the downvoter please elaborate on why he downvoted? Is my question missing some details or effort; can I add something which would make the downvote redundant?
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 16 '18 at 11:19
1
$begingroup$
I can't speak for the downvoter, but perhaps they noticed that your proposed value for $mathfrak{I}$ in equation $(1)$ is way off numerically. The correct value should be $mathfrak{I}=4,zeta{left(2right)},zeta{left(3right)}-color{red}{9},zeta{left(5right)}$.
$endgroup$
– David H
Dec 16 '18 at 12:55
$begingroup$
@David H Oh gosh. I have forgotten to write down the $9$. I will add this in the post hence it is like this within the source I have given.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 16 '18 at 13:07
1
$begingroup$
Antiderivative of begin{align}frac{1}{1-x}left[frac{operatorname{Li}_2(x)}x-zeta(2)right]end{align} is computable. This is the part corresponding to $zeta(2)zeta(3)$
$endgroup$
– FDP
Dec 16 '18 at 14:01
$begingroup$
Have you asked this on AoPS too? Or contact the author of the page?
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Jan 30 at 11:25