Paasche price index: cost of living adjustment (economics)












0












$begingroup$


I am trying to figure out the following question involving the Paasche price index:




  • two goods are perfect substitutes (let's assume for simplicity that indifference curve has slope of -1)

  • relative price of good 1 to good 2 is 1/2 in country A and I am moving to country B


Question: In which scenario does a Paasche price index cost of living adjustment to my salary in moving from country A to B leave me worse off?



I am confused because it seems to me that with perfect substitutes the Paasche index is the true index but there must be a scenario where that is not the case..






applications economics







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What are the underlying assumptions: that there are only these two goods to consume and that you build your basket just by choosing some fixed quantity of the cheaper good whatever it is in each country, or something else?
    $endgroup$
    – fedja
    Dec 15 '18 at 2:22










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, there are only these two goods. And I guess that the quantities will be part of the answer..
    $endgroup$
    – Joe
    Dec 15 '18 at 12:40
















0












$begingroup$


I am trying to figure out the following question involving the Paasche price index:




  • two goods are perfect substitutes (let's assume for simplicity that indifference curve has slope of -1)

  • relative price of good 1 to good 2 is 1/2 in country A and I am moving to country B


Question: In which scenario does a Paasche price index cost of living adjustment to my salary in moving from country A to B leave me worse off?



I am confused because it seems to me that with perfect substitutes the Paasche index is the true index but there must be a scenario where that is not the case..






applications economics







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What are the underlying assumptions: that there are only these two goods to consume and that you build your basket just by choosing some fixed quantity of the cheaper good whatever it is in each country, or something else?
    $endgroup$
    – fedja
    Dec 15 '18 at 2:22










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, there are only these two goods. And I guess that the quantities will be part of the answer..
    $endgroup$
    – Joe
    Dec 15 '18 at 12:40














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I am trying to figure out the following question involving the Paasche price index:




  • two goods are perfect substitutes (let's assume for simplicity that indifference curve has slope of -1)

  • relative price of good 1 to good 2 is 1/2 in country A and I am moving to country B


Question: In which scenario does a Paasche price index cost of living adjustment to my salary in moving from country A to B leave me worse off?



I am confused because it seems to me that with perfect substitutes the Paasche index is the true index but there must be a scenario where that is not the case..






applications economics







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am trying to figure out the following question involving the Paasche price index:




  • two goods are perfect substitutes (let's assume for simplicity that indifference curve has slope of -1)

  • relative price of good 1 to good 2 is 1/2 in country A and I am moving to country B


Question: In which scenario does a Paasche price index cost of living adjustment to my salary in moving from country A to B leave me worse off?



I am confused because it seems to me that with perfect substitutes the Paasche index is the true index but there must be a scenario where that is not the case..






applications economics




applications economics






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 14 '18 at 22:16









JoeJoe

283




283








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What are the underlying assumptions: that there are only these two goods to consume and that you build your basket just by choosing some fixed quantity of the cheaper good whatever it is in each country, or something else?
    $endgroup$
    – fedja
    Dec 15 '18 at 2:22










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, there are only these two goods. And I guess that the quantities will be part of the answer..
    $endgroup$
    – Joe
    Dec 15 '18 at 12:40














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What are the underlying assumptions: that there are only these two goods to consume and that you build your basket just by choosing some fixed quantity of the cheaper good whatever it is in each country, or something else?
    $endgroup$
    – fedja
    Dec 15 '18 at 2:22










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, there are only these two goods. And I guess that the quantities will be part of the answer..
    $endgroup$
    – Joe
    Dec 15 '18 at 12:40








1




1




$begingroup$
What are the underlying assumptions: that there are only these two goods to consume and that you build your basket just by choosing some fixed quantity of the cheaper good whatever it is in each country, or something else?
$endgroup$
– fedja
Dec 15 '18 at 2:22




$begingroup$
What are the underlying assumptions: that there are only these two goods to consume and that you build your basket just by choosing some fixed quantity of the cheaper good whatever it is in each country, or something else?
$endgroup$
– fedja
Dec 15 '18 at 2:22












$begingroup$
Yes, there are only these two goods. And I guess that the quantities will be part of the answer..
$endgroup$
– Joe
Dec 15 '18 at 12:40




$begingroup$
Yes, there are only these two goods. And I guess that the quantities will be part of the answer..
$endgroup$
– Joe
Dec 15 '18 at 12:40










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

If I understand the definitions right, adjusting your income according to the Paasche index means that if you end up with spending your salary on a certain basket of goods in the new country, exactly the same basket of goods would cost you your old salary in your old country. This never makes your life better because, assuming that you always optimize your basket, the new basket of goods that is an optimum in country B would be already affordable in country A, but nobody said that you might not be able to optimize further while in A. It is a fair game though, if the new basket is also optimal in A.



In your two perfect substitutes scenario, the optimal basket just consists of a single good (the cheaper one). In country A, it is good 1, so if it remains good 1 in country B, the game will be fair: the Paasche index gives you the coefficient $frac {p_B(1)q_B(1)+p_B(2)q_B(2)}{p_A(1)q_B(1)+p_A(2)q_B(2)}=frac {p_B(1)}{p_A(1)}$ because $q_B(2)=0$ (you still ignore good 2) and your salary is adjusted according to the cost of good 1. However, as soon as the price $p_B(1)$ of good 1 in the country B is greater than the price $p_B(2)$ of good 2, you'll switch your basket to pure good 2 when moving from A to B, and the result will be that the Paasche index will be the ratio of prices of good 2, i.e., you'll end up twice worse off because in country A you could derive twice as much utility as you can afford now in country B on your new salary by using good 1 instead.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039942%2fpaasche-price-index-cost-of-living-adjustment-economics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    If I understand the definitions right, adjusting your income according to the Paasche index means that if you end up with spending your salary on a certain basket of goods in the new country, exactly the same basket of goods would cost you your old salary in your old country. This never makes your life better because, assuming that you always optimize your basket, the new basket of goods that is an optimum in country B would be already affordable in country A, but nobody said that you might not be able to optimize further while in A. It is a fair game though, if the new basket is also optimal in A.



    In your two perfect substitutes scenario, the optimal basket just consists of a single good (the cheaper one). In country A, it is good 1, so if it remains good 1 in country B, the game will be fair: the Paasche index gives you the coefficient $frac {p_B(1)q_B(1)+p_B(2)q_B(2)}{p_A(1)q_B(1)+p_A(2)q_B(2)}=frac {p_B(1)}{p_A(1)}$ because $q_B(2)=0$ (you still ignore good 2) and your salary is adjusted according to the cost of good 1. However, as soon as the price $p_B(1)$ of good 1 in the country B is greater than the price $p_B(2)$ of good 2, you'll switch your basket to pure good 2 when moving from A to B, and the result will be that the Paasche index will be the ratio of prices of good 2, i.e., you'll end up twice worse off because in country A you could derive twice as much utility as you can afford now in country B on your new salary by using good 1 instead.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      If I understand the definitions right, adjusting your income according to the Paasche index means that if you end up with spending your salary on a certain basket of goods in the new country, exactly the same basket of goods would cost you your old salary in your old country. This never makes your life better because, assuming that you always optimize your basket, the new basket of goods that is an optimum in country B would be already affordable in country A, but nobody said that you might not be able to optimize further while in A. It is a fair game though, if the new basket is also optimal in A.



      In your two perfect substitutes scenario, the optimal basket just consists of a single good (the cheaper one). In country A, it is good 1, so if it remains good 1 in country B, the game will be fair: the Paasche index gives you the coefficient $frac {p_B(1)q_B(1)+p_B(2)q_B(2)}{p_A(1)q_B(1)+p_A(2)q_B(2)}=frac {p_B(1)}{p_A(1)}$ because $q_B(2)=0$ (you still ignore good 2) and your salary is adjusted according to the cost of good 1. However, as soon as the price $p_B(1)$ of good 1 in the country B is greater than the price $p_B(2)$ of good 2, you'll switch your basket to pure good 2 when moving from A to B, and the result will be that the Paasche index will be the ratio of prices of good 2, i.e., you'll end up twice worse off because in country A you could derive twice as much utility as you can afford now in country B on your new salary by using good 1 instead.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        If I understand the definitions right, adjusting your income according to the Paasche index means that if you end up with spending your salary on a certain basket of goods in the new country, exactly the same basket of goods would cost you your old salary in your old country. This never makes your life better because, assuming that you always optimize your basket, the new basket of goods that is an optimum in country B would be already affordable in country A, but nobody said that you might not be able to optimize further while in A. It is a fair game though, if the new basket is also optimal in A.



        In your two perfect substitutes scenario, the optimal basket just consists of a single good (the cheaper one). In country A, it is good 1, so if it remains good 1 in country B, the game will be fair: the Paasche index gives you the coefficient $frac {p_B(1)q_B(1)+p_B(2)q_B(2)}{p_A(1)q_B(1)+p_A(2)q_B(2)}=frac {p_B(1)}{p_A(1)}$ because $q_B(2)=0$ (you still ignore good 2) and your salary is adjusted according to the cost of good 1. However, as soon as the price $p_B(1)$ of good 1 in the country B is greater than the price $p_B(2)$ of good 2, you'll switch your basket to pure good 2 when moving from A to B, and the result will be that the Paasche index will be the ratio of prices of good 2, i.e., you'll end up twice worse off because in country A you could derive twice as much utility as you can afford now in country B on your new salary by using good 1 instead.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        If I understand the definitions right, adjusting your income according to the Paasche index means that if you end up with spending your salary on a certain basket of goods in the new country, exactly the same basket of goods would cost you your old salary in your old country. This never makes your life better because, assuming that you always optimize your basket, the new basket of goods that is an optimum in country B would be already affordable in country A, but nobody said that you might not be able to optimize further while in A. It is a fair game though, if the new basket is also optimal in A.



        In your two perfect substitutes scenario, the optimal basket just consists of a single good (the cheaper one). In country A, it is good 1, so if it remains good 1 in country B, the game will be fair: the Paasche index gives you the coefficient $frac {p_B(1)q_B(1)+p_B(2)q_B(2)}{p_A(1)q_B(1)+p_A(2)q_B(2)}=frac {p_B(1)}{p_A(1)}$ because $q_B(2)=0$ (you still ignore good 2) and your salary is adjusted according to the cost of good 1. However, as soon as the price $p_B(1)$ of good 1 in the country B is greater than the price $p_B(2)$ of good 2, you'll switch your basket to pure good 2 when moving from A to B, and the result will be that the Paasche index will be the ratio of prices of good 2, i.e., you'll end up twice worse off because in country A you could derive twice as much utility as you can afford now in country B on your new salary by using good 1 instead.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 15 '18 at 14:54









        fedjafedja

        9,43511627




        9,43511627






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039942%2fpaasche-price-index-cost-of-living-adjustment-economics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Image
            Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück ...
            Read more

            Verónica Boquete

            Image
            Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl ...
            Read more

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

            Image
            Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich ...
            Read more