existence of limit when both RHL and LHL approachees Positive infinity












1












$begingroup$


We know that if $$lim_{x to a^+}f(x)=lim_{x to a^-}f(x)=L$$ Then $$lim_{x to a}f(x) =L$$ if $L$ is finite



But if $$lim_{x to a^+}f(x) to +infty$$ and
$$lim_{x to a^-}f(x) to +infty$$



Can we say $$lim_{x to a} f(x)$$ Does not exists since we cannot compare two infinities.






calculus limits







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean "we cannot compare two infinities"? The statement $lim_{x to a} f(x) = infty$ is defined in terms of lower bounds of a function.
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Jan 5 '16 at 4:17










  • $begingroup$
    what i mean is if $L$ is finite $L-L=0$, but if $L$ is $infty$, $infty-infty $ is indeterminate. Hence can we say Limit DNE?
    $endgroup$
    – Umesh shankar
    Jan 5 '16 at 4:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, the limit is equal to infinity. How would subtraction be involved?
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Jan 5 '16 at 4:20


















1












$begingroup$


We know that if $$lim_{x to a^+}f(x)=lim_{x to a^-}f(x)=L$$ Then $$lim_{x to a}f(x) =L$$ if $L$ is finite



But if $$lim_{x to a^+}f(x) to +infty$$ and
$$lim_{x to a^-}f(x) to +infty$$



Can we say $$lim_{x to a} f(x)$$ Does not exists since we cannot compare two infinities.






calculus limits







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean "we cannot compare two infinities"? The statement $lim_{x to a} f(x) = infty$ is defined in terms of lower bounds of a function.
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Jan 5 '16 at 4:17










  • $begingroup$
    what i mean is if $L$ is finite $L-L=0$, but if $L$ is $infty$, $infty-infty $ is indeterminate. Hence can we say Limit DNE?
    $endgroup$
    – Umesh shankar
    Jan 5 '16 at 4:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, the limit is equal to infinity. How would subtraction be involved?
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Jan 5 '16 at 4:20
















1












1








1





$begingroup$


We know that if $$lim_{x to a^+}f(x)=lim_{x to a^-}f(x)=L$$ Then $$lim_{x to a}f(x) =L$$ if $L$ is finite



But if $$lim_{x to a^+}f(x) to +infty$$ and
$$lim_{x to a^-}f(x) to +infty$$



Can we say $$lim_{x to a} f(x)$$ Does not exists since we cannot compare two infinities.






calculus limits







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




We know that if $$lim_{x to a^+}f(x)=lim_{x to a^-}f(x)=L$$ Then $$lim_{x to a}f(x) =L$$ if $L$ is finite



But if $$lim_{x to a^+}f(x) to +infty$$ and
$$lim_{x to a^-}f(x) to +infty$$



Can we say $$lim_{x to a} f(x)$$ Does not exists since we cannot compare two infinities.






calculus limits




calculus limits






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 5 '16 at 4:15









Umesh shankarUmesh shankar

3,09231220




3,09231220












  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean "we cannot compare two infinities"? The statement $lim_{x to a} f(x) = infty$ is defined in terms of lower bounds of a function.
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Jan 5 '16 at 4:17










  • $begingroup$
    what i mean is if $L$ is finite $L-L=0$, but if $L$ is $infty$, $infty-infty $ is indeterminate. Hence can we say Limit DNE?
    $endgroup$
    – Umesh shankar
    Jan 5 '16 at 4:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, the limit is equal to infinity. How would subtraction be involved?
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Jan 5 '16 at 4:20




















  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean "we cannot compare two infinities"? The statement $lim_{x to a} f(x) = infty$ is defined in terms of lower bounds of a function.
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Jan 5 '16 at 4:17










  • $begingroup$
    what i mean is if $L$ is finite $L-L=0$, but if $L$ is $infty$, $infty-infty $ is indeterminate. Hence can we say Limit DNE?
    $endgroup$
    – Umesh shankar
    Jan 5 '16 at 4:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, the limit is equal to infinity. How would subtraction be involved?
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Jan 5 '16 at 4:20


















$begingroup$
What do you mean "we cannot compare two infinities"? The statement $lim_{x to a} f(x) = infty$ is defined in terms of lower bounds of a function.
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Jan 5 '16 at 4:17




$begingroup$
What do you mean "we cannot compare two infinities"? The statement $lim_{x to a} f(x) = infty$ is defined in terms of lower bounds of a function.
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Jan 5 '16 at 4:17












$begingroup$
what i mean is if $L$ is finite $L-L=0$, but if $L$ is $infty$, $infty-infty $ is indeterminate. Hence can we say Limit DNE?
$endgroup$
– Umesh shankar
Jan 5 '16 at 4:19




$begingroup$
what i mean is if $L$ is finite $L-L=0$, but if $L$ is $infty$, $infty-infty $ is indeterminate. Hence can we say Limit DNE?
$endgroup$
– Umesh shankar
Jan 5 '16 at 4:19




1




1




$begingroup$
No, the limit is equal to infinity. How would subtraction be involved?
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Jan 5 '16 at 4:20






$begingroup$
No, the limit is equal to infinity. How would subtraction be involved?
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Jan 5 '16 at 4:20












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Having $$lim_{x to a^+} f(x)=infty$$ alone is enough to conclude that the limit does not exist, since otherwise there is a finite $L$ such that $$lim_{x to a} f(x)=L,$$ which implies that $$lim_{x to a^+} f(x)=L.$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Limits of $pm infty$ can exist.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    May 14 '17 at 21:39



















0












$begingroup$

In general, we only say a limit 'exists' when it is finite. When we say $lim_{xto a}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that



$$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta),, f(x)>M tag{1}$$



In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large near $a$ — all of $f$. Contrast this with '$f$ attains arbitrarily large value near $a$'.




When we say $lim_{xto a^+}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that



$$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta,text{ and }, x>a),, f(x)>Mtag{2}$$



In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large in a right-neighborhood of $a$ — all of $f$, once again.




When we say $lim_{xto a^-}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that



$$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta,text{ and }, x<a),, f(x)>Mtag{3}$$



In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large in a left-neighborhood of $a$ — all of $f$, once again.




Can you see how statements $(2)$ and $(3)$, combined, imply statement $(1)$?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$


    Can we say $lim limits_{xrightarrow a}f(x)$ does not exists since we cannot compare two infinities?




    Yes, we can say that it does not exist at a point $a$ because plus and minus infinities are different behaviors (function growing without bound/decreasing without bound). Moreover, limits of functions that end up in plus or minus infinity actually do not exist either. However, we do write that a limit is equal to $pminfty$, but that's only done for the purposes of describing the way a function behaves. It's just supposed to be more informative that way, meaning it gives us more information about a function's behavior near a particular point.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$














      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1600433%2fexistence-of-limit-when-both-rhl-and-lhl-approachees-positive-infinity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      0












      $begingroup$

      Having $$lim_{x to a^+} f(x)=infty$$ alone is enough to conclude that the limit does not exist, since otherwise there is a finite $L$ such that $$lim_{x to a} f(x)=L,$$ which implies that $$lim_{x to a^+} f(x)=L.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Limits of $pm infty$ can exist.
        $endgroup$
        – zhw.
        May 14 '17 at 21:39
















      0












      $begingroup$

      Having $$lim_{x to a^+} f(x)=infty$$ alone is enough to conclude that the limit does not exist, since otherwise there is a finite $L$ such that $$lim_{x to a} f(x)=L,$$ which implies that $$lim_{x to a^+} f(x)=L.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Limits of $pm infty$ can exist.
        $endgroup$
        – zhw.
        May 14 '17 at 21:39














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$

      Having $$lim_{x to a^+} f(x)=infty$$ alone is enough to conclude that the limit does not exist, since otherwise there is a finite $L$ such that $$lim_{x to a} f(x)=L,$$ which implies that $$lim_{x to a^+} f(x)=L.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      Having $$lim_{x to a^+} f(x)=infty$$ alone is enough to conclude that the limit does not exist, since otherwise there is a finite $L$ such that $$lim_{x to a} f(x)=L,$$ which implies that $$lim_{x to a^+} f(x)=L.$$







      share|cite|improve this answer












      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer










      answered Jan 5 '16 at 4:36









      zwischzwisch

      12




      12












      • $begingroup$
        Limits of $pm infty$ can exist.
        $endgroup$
        – zhw.
        May 14 '17 at 21:39


















      • $begingroup$
        Limits of $pm infty$ can exist.
        $endgroup$
        – zhw.
        May 14 '17 at 21:39
















      $begingroup$
      Limits of $pm infty$ can exist.
      $endgroup$
      – zhw.
      May 14 '17 at 21:39




      $begingroup$
      Limits of $pm infty$ can exist.
      $endgroup$
      – zhw.
      May 14 '17 at 21:39











      0












      $begingroup$

      In general, we only say a limit 'exists' when it is finite. When we say $lim_{xto a}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that



      $$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta),, f(x)>M tag{1}$$



      In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large near $a$ — all of $f$. Contrast this with '$f$ attains arbitrarily large value near $a$'.




      When we say $lim_{xto a^+}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that



      $$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta,text{ and }, x>a),, f(x)>Mtag{2}$$



      In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large in a right-neighborhood of $a$ — all of $f$, once again.




      When we say $lim_{xto a^-}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that



      $$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta,text{ and }, x<a),, f(x)>Mtag{3}$$



      In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large in a left-neighborhood of $a$ — all of $f$, once again.




      Can you see how statements $(2)$ and $(3)$, combined, imply statement $(1)$?






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        0












        $begingroup$

        In general, we only say a limit 'exists' when it is finite. When we say $lim_{xto a}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that



        $$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta),, f(x)>M tag{1}$$



        In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large near $a$ — all of $f$. Contrast this with '$f$ attains arbitrarily large value near $a$'.




        When we say $lim_{xto a^+}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that



        $$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta,text{ and }, x>a),, f(x)>Mtag{2}$$



        In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large in a right-neighborhood of $a$ — all of $f$, once again.




        When we say $lim_{xto a^-}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that



        $$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta,text{ and }, x<a),, f(x)>Mtag{3}$$



        In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large in a left-neighborhood of $a$ — all of $f$, once again.




        Can you see how statements $(2)$ and $(3)$, combined, imply statement $(1)$?






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          In general, we only say a limit 'exists' when it is finite. When we say $lim_{xto a}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that



          $$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta),, f(x)>M tag{1}$$



          In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large near $a$ — all of $f$. Contrast this with '$f$ attains arbitrarily large value near $a$'.




          When we say $lim_{xto a^+}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that



          $$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta,text{ and }, x>a),, f(x)>Mtag{2}$$



          In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large in a right-neighborhood of $a$ — all of $f$, once again.




          When we say $lim_{xto a^-}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that



          $$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta,text{ and }, x<a),, f(x)>Mtag{3}$$



          In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large in a left-neighborhood of $a$ — all of $f$, once again.




          Can you see how statements $(2)$ and $(3)$, combined, imply statement $(1)$?






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          In general, we only say a limit 'exists' when it is finite. When we say $lim_{xto a}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that



          $$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta),, f(x)>M tag{1}$$



          In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large near $a$ — all of $f$. Contrast this with '$f$ attains arbitrarily large value near $a$'.




          When we say $lim_{xto a^+}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that



          $$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta,text{ and }, x>a),, f(x)>Mtag{2}$$



          In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large in a right-neighborhood of $a$ — all of $f$, once again.




          When we say $lim_{xto a^-}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that



          $$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta,text{ and }, x<a),, f(x)>Mtag{3}$$



          In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large in a left-neighborhood of $a$ — all of $f$, once again.




          Can you see how statements $(2)$ and $(3)$, combined, imply statement $(1)$?







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 6 '17 at 14:18









          FimpellizieriFimpellizieri

          17.2k11836




          17.2k11836























              0












              $begingroup$


              Can we say $lim limits_{xrightarrow a}f(x)$ does not exists since we cannot compare two infinities?




              Yes, we can say that it does not exist at a point $a$ because plus and minus infinities are different behaviors (function growing without bound/decreasing without bound). Moreover, limits of functions that end up in plus or minus infinity actually do not exist either. However, we do write that a limit is equal to $pminfty$, but that's only done for the purposes of describing the way a function behaves. It's just supposed to be more informative that way, meaning it gives us more information about a function's behavior near a particular point.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$


                Can we say $lim limits_{xrightarrow a}f(x)$ does not exists since we cannot compare two infinities?




                Yes, we can say that it does not exist at a point $a$ because plus and minus infinities are different behaviors (function growing without bound/decreasing without bound). Moreover, limits of functions that end up in plus or minus infinity actually do not exist either. However, we do write that a limit is equal to $pminfty$, but that's only done for the purposes of describing the way a function behaves. It's just supposed to be more informative that way, meaning it gives us more information about a function's behavior near a particular point.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$


                  Can we say $lim limits_{xrightarrow a}f(x)$ does not exists since we cannot compare two infinities?




                  Yes, we can say that it does not exist at a point $a$ because plus and minus infinities are different behaviors (function growing without bound/decreasing without bound). Moreover, limits of functions that end up in plus or minus infinity actually do not exist either. However, we do write that a limit is equal to $pminfty$, but that's only done for the purposes of describing the way a function behaves. It's just supposed to be more informative that way, meaning it gives us more information about a function's behavior near a particular point.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$




                  Can we say $lim limits_{xrightarrow a}f(x)$ does not exists since we cannot compare two infinities?




                  Yes, we can say that it does not exist at a point $a$ because plus and minus infinities are different behaviors (function growing without bound/decreasing without bound). Moreover, limits of functions that end up in plus or minus infinity actually do not exist either. However, we do write that a limit is equal to $pminfty$, but that's only done for the purposes of describing the way a function behaves. It's just supposed to be more informative that way, meaning it gives us more information about a function's behavior near a particular point.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Nov 6 '17 at 14:40

























                  answered Nov 6 '17 at 14:34









                  Michael RybkinMichael Rybkin

                  4,244422




                  4,244422






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1600433%2fexistence-of-limit-when-both-rhl-and-lhl-approachees-positive-infinity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Bundesstraße 106

                      Image
                      Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück
                      Read more

                      Verónica Boquete

                      Image
                      Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl
                      Read more

                      Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

                      Image
                      Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich
                      Read more