Prove sum of subspaces is the smallest containing subspace












0












$begingroup$


I understand that it takes three steps:





  • $U_1+...+U_m$ is a vector space

  • $U_1,...,U_m subset U_1+...+U_m$

  • $U_1+...+U_m subset U_1,...,U_m$


I know how to prove point 1. And point 2 is OK since the sum must contain all its elements.



The problem is point 3. How to see that $U_1+...+U_m subset U_1,...,U_m$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is $V$ in this stuff?
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Dec 27 '18 at 22:27










  • $begingroup$
    @Bernard is it better now?
    $endgroup$
    – JOHN
    Dec 27 '18 at 22:34
















0












$begingroup$


I understand that it takes three steps:





  • $U_1+...+U_m$ is a vector space

  • $U_1,...,U_m subset U_1+...+U_m$

  • $U_1+...+U_m subset U_1,...,U_m$


I know how to prove point 1. And point 2 is OK since the sum must contain all its elements.



The problem is point 3. How to see that $U_1+...+U_m subset U_1,...,U_m$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is $V$ in this stuff?
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Dec 27 '18 at 22:27










  • $begingroup$
    @Bernard is it better now?
    $endgroup$
    – JOHN
    Dec 27 '18 at 22:34














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I understand that it takes three steps:





  • $U_1+...+U_m$ is a vector space

  • $U_1,...,U_m subset U_1+...+U_m$

  • $U_1+...+U_m subset U_1,...,U_m$


I know how to prove point 1. And point 2 is OK since the sum must contain all its elements.



The problem is point 3. How to see that $U_1+...+U_m subset U_1,...,U_m$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I understand that it takes three steps:





  • $U_1+...+U_m$ is a vector space

  • $U_1,...,U_m subset U_1+...+U_m$

  • $U_1+...+U_m subset U_1,...,U_m$


I know how to prove point 1. And point 2 is OK since the sum must contain all its elements.



The problem is point 3. How to see that $U_1+...+U_m subset U_1,...,U_m$







linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 27 '18 at 23:33









Rafael Holanda

2,721722




2,721722










asked Dec 27 '18 at 22:24









JOHN JOHN

4589




4589








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is $V$ in this stuff?
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Dec 27 '18 at 22:27










  • $begingroup$
    @Bernard is it better now?
    $endgroup$
    – JOHN
    Dec 27 '18 at 22:34














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is $V$ in this stuff?
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Dec 27 '18 at 22:27










  • $begingroup$
    @Bernard is it better now?
    $endgroup$
    – JOHN
    Dec 27 '18 at 22:34








1




1




$begingroup$
What is $V$ in this stuff?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Dec 27 '18 at 22:27




$begingroup$
What is $V$ in this stuff?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Dec 27 '18 at 22:27












$begingroup$
@Bernard is it better now?
$endgroup$
– JOHN
Dec 27 '18 at 22:34




$begingroup$
@Bernard is it better now?
$endgroup$
– JOHN
Dec 27 '18 at 22:34










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

You can't prove point $3$: it is false in general (except if all $U_i$s are contained in one of them).



Actually what remains to prove is that if a subspace $V$ contains $U_1,dots,U_m$, it contains their sum
$$U_1+dots+U_m=bigl{u_1+dots+u_mmid forall i=1,dots, m,;u_iin U_ibigr}.$$
This is clear, since if each $u_iin U_i$, it also belongs to $V$, which is a subspace, so their sum belongs to $V$. This proves that
$$U_1+dots+U_msubset V.$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054407%2fprove-sum-of-subspaces-is-the-smallest-containing-subspace%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    You can't prove point $3$: it is false in general (except if all $U_i$s are contained in one of them).



    Actually what remains to prove is that if a subspace $V$ contains $U_1,dots,U_m$, it contains their sum
    $$U_1+dots+U_m=bigl{u_1+dots+u_mmid forall i=1,dots, m,;u_iin U_ibigr}.$$
    This is clear, since if each $u_iin U_i$, it also belongs to $V$, which is a subspace, so their sum belongs to $V$. This proves that
    $$U_1+dots+U_msubset V.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      You can't prove point $3$: it is false in general (except if all $U_i$s are contained in one of them).



      Actually what remains to prove is that if a subspace $V$ contains $U_1,dots,U_m$, it contains their sum
      $$U_1+dots+U_m=bigl{u_1+dots+u_mmid forall i=1,dots, m,;u_iin U_ibigr}.$$
      This is clear, since if each $u_iin U_i$, it also belongs to $V$, which is a subspace, so their sum belongs to $V$. This proves that
      $$U_1+dots+U_msubset V.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        You can't prove point $3$: it is false in general (except if all $U_i$s are contained in one of them).



        Actually what remains to prove is that if a subspace $V$ contains $U_1,dots,U_m$, it contains their sum
        $$U_1+dots+U_m=bigl{u_1+dots+u_mmid forall i=1,dots, m,;u_iin U_ibigr}.$$
        This is clear, since if each $u_iin U_i$, it also belongs to $V$, which is a subspace, so their sum belongs to $V$. This proves that
        $$U_1+dots+U_msubset V.$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        You can't prove point $3$: it is false in general (except if all $U_i$s are contained in one of them).



        Actually what remains to prove is that if a subspace $V$ contains $U_1,dots,U_m$, it contains their sum
        $$U_1+dots+U_m=bigl{u_1+dots+u_mmid forall i=1,dots, m,;u_iin U_ibigr}.$$
        This is clear, since if each $u_iin U_i$, it also belongs to $V$, which is a subspace, so their sum belongs to $V$. This proves that
        $$U_1+dots+U_msubset V.$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 27 '18 at 22:48









        BernardBernard

        124k742117




        124k742117






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054407%2fprove-sum-of-subspaces-is-the-smallest-containing-subspace%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Verónica Boquete

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten