How do I show that $2a$ is the diameter of $A=(-a,a)$?












1












$begingroup$


proof. Suppose that $A = (-a,a) = (-a,0]cup [0,a)$ and let $x in [0,a)$ and $yin (-a,0]$ . Then $x + epsilon = a = sup A$ for some $epsilon > 0$ and $y-beta = -a = inf A$ for some $beta >0$. So,



$2a=a-(-a)=x+epsilon -(y-beta)=|x-y| + (epsilon + beta)$. Then



$2a ge |x-y|$.



Would I have to show that $2a$ is the supremum of $|x-y|$ by also showing the cases when $x,y in (-a,0]$ , and $x,y in [0,a)$






real-analysis







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    proof. Suppose that $A = (-a,a) = (-a,0]cup [0,a)$ and let $x in [0,a)$ and $yin (-a,0]$ . Then $x + epsilon = a = sup A$ for some $epsilon > 0$ and $y-beta = -a = inf A$ for some $beta >0$. So,



    $2a=a-(-a)=x+epsilon -(y-beta)=|x-y| + (epsilon + beta)$. Then



    $2a ge |x-y|$.



    Would I have to show that $2a$ is the supremum of $|x-y|$ by also showing the cases when $x,y in (-a,0]$ , and $x,y in [0,a)$






    real-analysis







    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      proof. Suppose that $A = (-a,a) = (-a,0]cup [0,a)$ and let $x in [0,a)$ and $yin (-a,0]$ . Then $x + epsilon = a = sup A$ for some $epsilon > 0$ and $y-beta = -a = inf A$ for some $beta >0$. So,



      $2a=a-(-a)=x+epsilon -(y-beta)=|x-y| + (epsilon + beta)$. Then



      $2a ge |x-y|$.



      Would I have to show that $2a$ is the supremum of $|x-y|$ by also showing the cases when $x,y in (-a,0]$ , and $x,y in [0,a)$






      real-analysis







      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      proof. Suppose that $A = (-a,a) = (-a,0]cup [0,a)$ and let $x in [0,a)$ and $yin (-a,0]$ . Then $x + epsilon = a = sup A$ for some $epsilon > 0$ and $y-beta = -a = inf A$ for some $beta >0$. So,



      $2a=a-(-a)=x+epsilon -(y-beta)=|x-y| + (epsilon + beta)$. Then



      $2a ge |x-y|$.



      Would I have to show that $2a$ is the supremum of $|x-y|$ by also showing the cases when $x,y in (-a,0]$ , and $x,y in [0,a)$






      real-analysis




      real-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 27 '18 at 23:06









      K.MK.M

      734413




      734413






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          First you can prove that the diameter is $le 2a$ like this. Take any $x,y in (-a,a)$. Now consider two cases.




          • If $x le y$ then $-a < x le y < a$ and so $|x-y|=y-x<a-(-a)=2a$.


          • If $y le x$ then $-a < y le x < a$ and so $|x-y|=x-y<a-(-a)=2a$.



          Next you can prove that the diameter is $ge 2a$ like this. For any $epsilon in (0,a)$ we have $-a < -a+frac{epsilon}{2} < a - frac{epsilon}{2} < a$ and so the diameter is $ge (a - frac{epsilon}{2}) - (-a + frac{epsilon}{2}) = 2a - epsilon$. Since the diameter is $ge 2a-epsilon$ for all $epsilon>0$ it follows that the diameter is $ge 2a$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            1












            $begingroup$

            For any $x,y in A$ we have $|x-y| < 2a$. [If you to prove this claim more rigorously: Suppose without loss of generality that $x le y$. Then $-a < x le y < a$ so $y-x < a - (-a) = 2a$.] This shows $text{diameter}(A) le 2a$.



            To show $text{diameter}(A) = 2a$, we need to show $sup_{x,y in A} |x-y| = 2a$.
            For any fixed $epsilon > 0$, can you find $x,y in A$ such that $|x-y| ge 2a - epsilon$?






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Do we get $text{diameter}(A) le 2a$ since $text{diameter}(A)-epsilon <|y-x|<2a$ and that implies that $text{diameter}(A) le |y-x|<2a$?
              $endgroup$
              – K.M
              Dec 28 '18 at 4:32








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @K.M We showed that $2a$ is an upper bound for $|x-y|$ for all $x,y in A$. Since the diameter is the supremum (a.k.a. "least upper bound") of these $|x-y|$ values, we must have $text{diameter}(A) le 2a$.
              $endgroup$
              – angryavian
              Dec 28 '18 at 4:47



















            1












            $begingroup$

            You could do, but there are far easier ways. For example, simple note that for $x>yin A$, we have $|x-y| leq |a-x|+|x-y|+|y-(-a)| = |a-(-a)| = 2a$, so $2a$ is an upper bound for the diameter of $A$, and also that for any $varepsilon > 0$ with $delta := min(varepsilon,a)$, if we take $x = a - frac{delta}{2}$ and $y = frac{delta}{2}-a$, we have $x > y in A$, and $|x-y| = |2a-delta| geq 2a - deltageq 2a-varepsilon$, so $2a$ is also a lower bound for the diameter of $A$, hence is equal to the diameter of $A$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              I was wondering how you got $|a-(-a)|$ from $|a-x| +|x-y|+|y-(-a)|$?
              $endgroup$
              – K.M
              Dec 28 '18 at 0:04






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Because $-a < y < x < a$, all three of the terms inside the absolute value signs are positive, so $|a - x| + |x - y| + |y - (-a)| = a - x +x-y+y-(-a) = a-(-a) = |a-(-a)|$.
              $endgroup$
              – user3482749
              Dec 28 '18 at 14:04










            • $begingroup$
              Since $x>y$, I want to make sure that it follows that $|2a-delta|=2a-delta$?
              $endgroup$
              – K.M
              Dec 28 '18 at 18:27






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Yes, that's true.
              $endgroup$
              – user3482749
              Dec 28 '18 at 19:03












            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054428%2fhow-do-i-show-that-2a-is-the-diameter-of-a-a-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            First you can prove that the diameter is $le 2a$ like this. Take any $x,y in (-a,a)$. Now consider two cases.




            • If $x le y$ then $-a < x le y < a$ and so $|x-y|=y-x<a-(-a)=2a$.


            • If $y le x$ then $-a < y le x < a$ and so $|x-y|=x-y<a-(-a)=2a$.



            Next you can prove that the diameter is $ge 2a$ like this. For any $epsilon in (0,a)$ we have $-a < -a+frac{epsilon}{2} < a - frac{epsilon}{2} < a$ and so the diameter is $ge (a - frac{epsilon}{2}) - (-a + frac{epsilon}{2}) = 2a - epsilon$. Since the diameter is $ge 2a-epsilon$ for all $epsilon>0$ it follows that the diameter is $ge 2a$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              First you can prove that the diameter is $le 2a$ like this. Take any $x,y in (-a,a)$. Now consider two cases.




              • If $x le y$ then $-a < x le y < a$ and so $|x-y|=y-x<a-(-a)=2a$.


              • If $y le x$ then $-a < y le x < a$ and so $|x-y|=x-y<a-(-a)=2a$.



              Next you can prove that the diameter is $ge 2a$ like this. For any $epsilon in (0,a)$ we have $-a < -a+frac{epsilon}{2} < a - frac{epsilon}{2} < a$ and so the diameter is $ge (a - frac{epsilon}{2}) - (-a + frac{epsilon}{2}) = 2a - epsilon$. Since the diameter is $ge 2a-epsilon$ for all $epsilon>0$ it follows that the diameter is $ge 2a$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                First you can prove that the diameter is $le 2a$ like this. Take any $x,y in (-a,a)$. Now consider two cases.




                • If $x le y$ then $-a < x le y < a$ and so $|x-y|=y-x<a-(-a)=2a$.


                • If $y le x$ then $-a < y le x < a$ and so $|x-y|=x-y<a-(-a)=2a$.



                Next you can prove that the diameter is $ge 2a$ like this. For any $epsilon in (0,a)$ we have $-a < -a+frac{epsilon}{2} < a - frac{epsilon}{2} < a$ and so the diameter is $ge (a - frac{epsilon}{2}) - (-a + frac{epsilon}{2}) = 2a - epsilon$. Since the diameter is $ge 2a-epsilon$ for all $epsilon>0$ it follows that the diameter is $ge 2a$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                First you can prove that the diameter is $le 2a$ like this. Take any $x,y in (-a,a)$. Now consider two cases.




                • If $x le y$ then $-a < x le y < a$ and so $|x-y|=y-x<a-(-a)=2a$.


                • If $y le x$ then $-a < y le x < a$ and so $|x-y|=x-y<a-(-a)=2a$.



                Next you can prove that the diameter is $ge 2a$ like this. For any $epsilon in (0,a)$ we have $-a < -a+frac{epsilon}{2} < a - frac{epsilon}{2} < a$ and so the diameter is $ge (a - frac{epsilon}{2}) - (-a + frac{epsilon}{2}) = 2a - epsilon$. Since the diameter is $ge 2a-epsilon$ for all $epsilon>0$ it follows that the diameter is $ge 2a$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 27 '18 at 23:14









                Lee MosherLee Mosher

                52.4k33891




                52.4k33891























                    1












                    $begingroup$

                    For any $x,y in A$ we have $|x-y| < 2a$. [If you to prove this claim more rigorously: Suppose without loss of generality that $x le y$. Then $-a < x le y < a$ so $y-x < a - (-a) = 2a$.] This shows $text{diameter}(A) le 2a$.



                    To show $text{diameter}(A) = 2a$, we need to show $sup_{x,y in A} |x-y| = 2a$.
                    For any fixed $epsilon > 0$, can you find $x,y in A$ such that $|x-y| ge 2a - epsilon$?






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      Do we get $text{diameter}(A) le 2a$ since $text{diameter}(A)-epsilon <|y-x|<2a$ and that implies that $text{diameter}(A) le |y-x|<2a$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – K.M
                      Dec 28 '18 at 4:32








                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      @K.M We showed that $2a$ is an upper bound for $|x-y|$ for all $x,y in A$. Since the diameter is the supremum (a.k.a. "least upper bound") of these $|x-y|$ values, we must have $text{diameter}(A) le 2a$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – angryavian
                      Dec 28 '18 at 4:47
















                    1












                    $begingroup$

                    For any $x,y in A$ we have $|x-y| < 2a$. [If you to prove this claim more rigorously: Suppose without loss of generality that $x le y$. Then $-a < x le y < a$ so $y-x < a - (-a) = 2a$.] This shows $text{diameter}(A) le 2a$.



                    To show $text{diameter}(A) = 2a$, we need to show $sup_{x,y in A} |x-y| = 2a$.
                    For any fixed $epsilon > 0$, can you find $x,y in A$ such that $|x-y| ge 2a - epsilon$?






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      Do we get $text{diameter}(A) le 2a$ since $text{diameter}(A)-epsilon <|y-x|<2a$ and that implies that $text{diameter}(A) le |y-x|<2a$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – K.M
                      Dec 28 '18 at 4:32








                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      @K.M We showed that $2a$ is an upper bound for $|x-y|$ for all $x,y in A$. Since the diameter is the supremum (a.k.a. "least upper bound") of these $|x-y|$ values, we must have $text{diameter}(A) le 2a$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – angryavian
                      Dec 28 '18 at 4:47














                    1












                    1








                    1





                    $begingroup$

                    For any $x,y in A$ we have $|x-y| < 2a$. [If you to prove this claim more rigorously: Suppose without loss of generality that $x le y$. Then $-a < x le y < a$ so $y-x < a - (-a) = 2a$.] This shows $text{diameter}(A) le 2a$.



                    To show $text{diameter}(A) = 2a$, we need to show $sup_{x,y in A} |x-y| = 2a$.
                    For any fixed $epsilon > 0$, can you find $x,y in A$ such that $|x-y| ge 2a - epsilon$?






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    For any $x,y in A$ we have $|x-y| < 2a$. [If you to prove this claim more rigorously: Suppose without loss of generality that $x le y$. Then $-a < x le y < a$ so $y-x < a - (-a) = 2a$.] This shows $text{diameter}(A) le 2a$.



                    To show $text{diameter}(A) = 2a$, we need to show $sup_{x,y in A} |x-y| = 2a$.
                    For any fixed $epsilon > 0$, can you find $x,y in A$ such that $|x-y| ge 2a - epsilon$?







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Dec 27 '18 at 23:12









                    angryavianangryavian

                    42.6k23481




                    42.6k23481












                    • $begingroup$
                      Do we get $text{diameter}(A) le 2a$ since $text{diameter}(A)-epsilon <|y-x|<2a$ and that implies that $text{diameter}(A) le |y-x|<2a$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – K.M
                      Dec 28 '18 at 4:32








                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      @K.M We showed that $2a$ is an upper bound for $|x-y|$ for all $x,y in A$. Since the diameter is the supremum (a.k.a. "least upper bound") of these $|x-y|$ values, we must have $text{diameter}(A) le 2a$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – angryavian
                      Dec 28 '18 at 4:47


















                    • $begingroup$
                      Do we get $text{diameter}(A) le 2a$ since $text{diameter}(A)-epsilon <|y-x|<2a$ and that implies that $text{diameter}(A) le |y-x|<2a$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – K.M
                      Dec 28 '18 at 4:32








                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      @K.M We showed that $2a$ is an upper bound for $|x-y|$ for all $x,y in A$. Since the diameter is the supremum (a.k.a. "least upper bound") of these $|x-y|$ values, we must have $text{diameter}(A) le 2a$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – angryavian
                      Dec 28 '18 at 4:47
















                    $begingroup$
                    Do we get $text{diameter}(A) le 2a$ since $text{diameter}(A)-epsilon <|y-x|<2a$ and that implies that $text{diameter}(A) le |y-x|<2a$?
                    $endgroup$
                    – K.M
                    Dec 28 '18 at 4:32






                    $begingroup$
                    Do we get $text{diameter}(A) le 2a$ since $text{diameter}(A)-epsilon <|y-x|<2a$ and that implies that $text{diameter}(A) le |y-x|<2a$?
                    $endgroup$
                    – K.M
                    Dec 28 '18 at 4:32






                    1




                    1




                    $begingroup$
                    @K.M We showed that $2a$ is an upper bound for $|x-y|$ for all $x,y in A$. Since the diameter is the supremum (a.k.a. "least upper bound") of these $|x-y|$ values, we must have $text{diameter}(A) le 2a$.
                    $endgroup$
                    – angryavian
                    Dec 28 '18 at 4:47




                    $begingroup$
                    @K.M We showed that $2a$ is an upper bound for $|x-y|$ for all $x,y in A$. Since the diameter is the supremum (a.k.a. "least upper bound") of these $|x-y|$ values, we must have $text{diameter}(A) le 2a$.
                    $endgroup$
                    – angryavian
                    Dec 28 '18 at 4:47











                    1












                    $begingroup$

                    You could do, but there are far easier ways. For example, simple note that for $x>yin A$, we have $|x-y| leq |a-x|+|x-y|+|y-(-a)| = |a-(-a)| = 2a$, so $2a$ is an upper bound for the diameter of $A$, and also that for any $varepsilon > 0$ with $delta := min(varepsilon,a)$, if we take $x = a - frac{delta}{2}$ and $y = frac{delta}{2}-a$, we have $x > y in A$, and $|x-y| = |2a-delta| geq 2a - deltageq 2a-varepsilon$, so $2a$ is also a lower bound for the diameter of $A$, hence is equal to the diameter of $A$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      I was wondering how you got $|a-(-a)|$ from $|a-x| +|x-y|+|y-(-a)|$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – K.M
                      Dec 28 '18 at 0:04






                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      Because $-a < y < x < a$, all three of the terms inside the absolute value signs are positive, so $|a - x| + |x - y| + |y - (-a)| = a - x +x-y+y-(-a) = a-(-a) = |a-(-a)|$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – user3482749
                      Dec 28 '18 at 14:04










                    • $begingroup$
                      Since $x>y$, I want to make sure that it follows that $|2a-delta|=2a-delta$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – K.M
                      Dec 28 '18 at 18:27






                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      Yes, that's true.
                      $endgroup$
                      – user3482749
                      Dec 28 '18 at 19:03
















                    1












                    $begingroup$

                    You could do, but there are far easier ways. For example, simple note that for $x>yin A$, we have $|x-y| leq |a-x|+|x-y|+|y-(-a)| = |a-(-a)| = 2a$, so $2a$ is an upper bound for the diameter of $A$, and also that for any $varepsilon > 0$ with $delta := min(varepsilon,a)$, if we take $x = a - frac{delta}{2}$ and $y = frac{delta}{2}-a$, we have $x > y in A$, and $|x-y| = |2a-delta| geq 2a - deltageq 2a-varepsilon$, so $2a$ is also a lower bound for the diameter of $A$, hence is equal to the diameter of $A$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      I was wondering how you got $|a-(-a)|$ from $|a-x| +|x-y|+|y-(-a)|$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – K.M
                      Dec 28 '18 at 0:04






                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      Because $-a < y < x < a$, all three of the terms inside the absolute value signs are positive, so $|a - x| + |x - y| + |y - (-a)| = a - x +x-y+y-(-a) = a-(-a) = |a-(-a)|$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – user3482749
                      Dec 28 '18 at 14:04










                    • $begingroup$
                      Since $x>y$, I want to make sure that it follows that $|2a-delta|=2a-delta$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – K.M
                      Dec 28 '18 at 18:27






                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      Yes, that's true.
                      $endgroup$
                      – user3482749
                      Dec 28 '18 at 19:03














                    1












                    1








                    1





                    $begingroup$

                    You could do, but there are far easier ways. For example, simple note that for $x>yin A$, we have $|x-y| leq |a-x|+|x-y|+|y-(-a)| = |a-(-a)| = 2a$, so $2a$ is an upper bound for the diameter of $A$, and also that for any $varepsilon > 0$ with $delta := min(varepsilon,a)$, if we take $x = a - frac{delta}{2}$ and $y = frac{delta}{2}-a$, we have $x > y in A$, and $|x-y| = |2a-delta| geq 2a - deltageq 2a-varepsilon$, so $2a$ is also a lower bound for the diameter of $A$, hence is equal to the diameter of $A$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    You could do, but there are far easier ways. For example, simple note that for $x>yin A$, we have $|x-y| leq |a-x|+|x-y|+|y-(-a)| = |a-(-a)| = 2a$, so $2a$ is an upper bound for the diameter of $A$, and also that for any $varepsilon > 0$ with $delta := min(varepsilon,a)$, if we take $x = a - frac{delta}{2}$ and $y = frac{delta}{2}-a$, we have $x > y in A$, and $|x-y| = |2a-delta| geq 2a - deltageq 2a-varepsilon$, so $2a$ is also a lower bound for the diameter of $A$, hence is equal to the diameter of $A$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Dec 27 '18 at 23:14









                    user3482749user3482749

                    4,3291119




                    4,3291119












                    • $begingroup$
                      I was wondering how you got $|a-(-a)|$ from $|a-x| +|x-y|+|y-(-a)|$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – K.M
                      Dec 28 '18 at 0:04






                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      Because $-a < y < x < a$, all three of the terms inside the absolute value signs are positive, so $|a - x| + |x - y| + |y - (-a)| = a - x +x-y+y-(-a) = a-(-a) = |a-(-a)|$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – user3482749
                      Dec 28 '18 at 14:04










                    • $begingroup$
                      Since $x>y$, I want to make sure that it follows that $|2a-delta|=2a-delta$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – K.M
                      Dec 28 '18 at 18:27






                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      Yes, that's true.
                      $endgroup$
                      – user3482749
                      Dec 28 '18 at 19:03


















                    • $begingroup$
                      I was wondering how you got $|a-(-a)|$ from $|a-x| +|x-y|+|y-(-a)|$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – K.M
                      Dec 28 '18 at 0:04






                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      Because $-a < y < x < a$, all three of the terms inside the absolute value signs are positive, so $|a - x| + |x - y| + |y - (-a)| = a - x +x-y+y-(-a) = a-(-a) = |a-(-a)|$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – user3482749
                      Dec 28 '18 at 14:04










                    • $begingroup$
                      Since $x>y$, I want to make sure that it follows that $|2a-delta|=2a-delta$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – K.M
                      Dec 28 '18 at 18:27






                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      Yes, that's true.
                      $endgroup$
                      – user3482749
                      Dec 28 '18 at 19:03
















                    $begingroup$
                    I was wondering how you got $|a-(-a)|$ from $|a-x| +|x-y|+|y-(-a)|$?
                    $endgroup$
                    – K.M
                    Dec 28 '18 at 0:04




                    $begingroup$
                    I was wondering how you got $|a-(-a)|$ from $|a-x| +|x-y|+|y-(-a)|$?
                    $endgroup$
                    – K.M
                    Dec 28 '18 at 0:04




                    1




                    1




                    $begingroup$
                    Because $-a < y < x < a$, all three of the terms inside the absolute value signs are positive, so $|a - x| + |x - y| + |y - (-a)| = a - x +x-y+y-(-a) = a-(-a) = |a-(-a)|$.
                    $endgroup$
                    – user3482749
                    Dec 28 '18 at 14:04




                    $begingroup$
                    Because $-a < y < x < a$, all three of the terms inside the absolute value signs are positive, so $|a - x| + |x - y| + |y - (-a)| = a - x +x-y+y-(-a) = a-(-a) = |a-(-a)|$.
                    $endgroup$
                    – user3482749
                    Dec 28 '18 at 14:04












                    $begingroup$
                    Since $x>y$, I want to make sure that it follows that $|2a-delta|=2a-delta$?
                    $endgroup$
                    – K.M
                    Dec 28 '18 at 18:27




                    $begingroup$
                    Since $x>y$, I want to make sure that it follows that $|2a-delta|=2a-delta$?
                    $endgroup$
                    – K.M
                    Dec 28 '18 at 18:27




                    1




                    1




                    $begingroup$
                    Yes, that's true.
                    $endgroup$
                    – user3482749
                    Dec 28 '18 at 19:03




                    $begingroup$
                    Yes, that's true.
                    $endgroup$
                    – user3482749
                    Dec 28 '18 at 19:03


















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054428%2fhow-do-i-show-that-2a-is-the-diameter-of-a-a-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bundesstraße 106

                    Image
                    Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück
                    Read more

                    Verónica Boquete

                    Image
                    Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl
                    Read more

                    Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

                    Image
                    Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich
                    Read more