Galois Groups are isomorphic to subgroups of symmetric groups.












1












$begingroup$


I am currently working through Joseph Rotman's book "Galois Theory" and am trying to prove the following theorem.




If $f(x) in F[x]$ has $n$ distinct roots in its splitting field $E$, then Gal($E/F$) is isomorphic to a subgroup of the symmetric group $S_n$, thus its order is a divisor of $n!$.




I have struggled to understand the proof in the book and have therefore tried to write my own proof of this fact, I have found some questions close to this on this site, but haven't been able to find exactly what I'm looking for.



My proof (so far) is as follows:



Proof:



Let $X = {alpha_1, ... , alpha_n }$ be the set of roots of $f(x)$, as $E$ is the splitting field of $f$, it may be written as $E = F(alpha_1, ... , alpha_n)$ and noting that $alpha_i neq alpha_j$ for $ineq j$. Let $sigma in$ Gal($E/F$) then $sigma(X) = X$ (a result from an earlier lemma). Now I would like to construct an injective homomorphism from $Gal(E/F)$ to $S_n$, my guess is the map which sends $sigma$ to its restriction in $X$, which I shall denote by $sigma_X$. Let $g$ be this map, then it is clear that $g$ is a homomorphism.



Now I try to show that $g$ is injective, consider $sigma , phi in Gal(E/F)$ where $sigma neq phi$, both of these functions are F-automorphisms of $E/F$, so they "fix" $F$, then we can conclude that $sigma$ and $phi$ can be different if and only if they act differently on $X$, which in the language of mathematics is precisely $sigma neq phi Leftrightarrow sigma_X neq phi_X$. This is the definition of an injective function.



This means that $|Gal(E/F)| leq |S_n| = n!$, however due to having constructed a homomorphism, we have mapped a group to another group, hence we have mapped $Gal(E/F)$ to a subgroup of $S_n$, whose order divides $|S_n|$ and therefore $|Gal(E/F)|$ divides $n!$, completing the proof.



Question



I am wondering whether my proof for this is correct, I think that it is mostly there, with the statement




we can conclude that $sigma$ and $phi$ can be different if and only if they act differently on X




perhaps being the only issue.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If $ sigma $ fixes all elements of $ X $, then it fixes the splitting field $ E $ as well. So $ sigma $ must be the identity and hence your map is injective.
    $endgroup$
    – hellHound
    Dec 30 '18 at 17:26










  • $begingroup$
    Use $operatorname{Gal}(E/F)$ for $operatorname{Gal}(E/F)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Dec 30 '18 at 17:59










  • $begingroup$
    > implying $E/F$ is galois
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Dec 31 '18 at 13:54
















1












$begingroup$


I am currently working through Joseph Rotman's book "Galois Theory" and am trying to prove the following theorem.




If $f(x) in F[x]$ has $n$ distinct roots in its splitting field $E$, then Gal($E/F$) is isomorphic to a subgroup of the symmetric group $S_n$, thus its order is a divisor of $n!$.




I have struggled to understand the proof in the book and have therefore tried to write my own proof of this fact, I have found some questions close to this on this site, but haven't been able to find exactly what I'm looking for.



My proof (so far) is as follows:



Proof:



Let $X = {alpha_1, ... , alpha_n }$ be the set of roots of $f(x)$, as $E$ is the splitting field of $f$, it may be written as $E = F(alpha_1, ... , alpha_n)$ and noting that $alpha_i neq alpha_j$ for $ineq j$. Let $sigma in$ Gal($E/F$) then $sigma(X) = X$ (a result from an earlier lemma). Now I would like to construct an injective homomorphism from $Gal(E/F)$ to $S_n$, my guess is the map which sends $sigma$ to its restriction in $X$, which I shall denote by $sigma_X$. Let $g$ be this map, then it is clear that $g$ is a homomorphism.



Now I try to show that $g$ is injective, consider $sigma , phi in Gal(E/F)$ where $sigma neq phi$, both of these functions are F-automorphisms of $E/F$, so they "fix" $F$, then we can conclude that $sigma$ and $phi$ can be different if and only if they act differently on $X$, which in the language of mathematics is precisely $sigma neq phi Leftrightarrow sigma_X neq phi_X$. This is the definition of an injective function.



This means that $|Gal(E/F)| leq |S_n| = n!$, however due to having constructed a homomorphism, we have mapped a group to another group, hence we have mapped $Gal(E/F)$ to a subgroup of $S_n$, whose order divides $|S_n|$ and therefore $|Gal(E/F)|$ divides $n!$, completing the proof.



Question



I am wondering whether my proof for this is correct, I think that it is mostly there, with the statement




we can conclude that $sigma$ and $phi$ can be different if and only if they act differently on X




perhaps being the only issue.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If $ sigma $ fixes all elements of $ X $, then it fixes the splitting field $ E $ as well. So $ sigma $ must be the identity and hence your map is injective.
    $endgroup$
    – hellHound
    Dec 30 '18 at 17:26










  • $begingroup$
    Use $operatorname{Gal}(E/F)$ for $operatorname{Gal}(E/F)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Dec 30 '18 at 17:59










  • $begingroup$
    > implying $E/F$ is galois
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Dec 31 '18 at 13:54














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I am currently working through Joseph Rotman's book "Galois Theory" and am trying to prove the following theorem.




If $f(x) in F[x]$ has $n$ distinct roots in its splitting field $E$, then Gal($E/F$) is isomorphic to a subgroup of the symmetric group $S_n$, thus its order is a divisor of $n!$.




I have struggled to understand the proof in the book and have therefore tried to write my own proof of this fact, I have found some questions close to this on this site, but haven't been able to find exactly what I'm looking for.



My proof (so far) is as follows:



Proof:



Let $X = {alpha_1, ... , alpha_n }$ be the set of roots of $f(x)$, as $E$ is the splitting field of $f$, it may be written as $E = F(alpha_1, ... , alpha_n)$ and noting that $alpha_i neq alpha_j$ for $ineq j$. Let $sigma in$ Gal($E/F$) then $sigma(X) = X$ (a result from an earlier lemma). Now I would like to construct an injective homomorphism from $Gal(E/F)$ to $S_n$, my guess is the map which sends $sigma$ to its restriction in $X$, which I shall denote by $sigma_X$. Let $g$ be this map, then it is clear that $g$ is a homomorphism.



Now I try to show that $g$ is injective, consider $sigma , phi in Gal(E/F)$ where $sigma neq phi$, both of these functions are F-automorphisms of $E/F$, so they "fix" $F$, then we can conclude that $sigma$ and $phi$ can be different if and only if they act differently on $X$, which in the language of mathematics is precisely $sigma neq phi Leftrightarrow sigma_X neq phi_X$. This is the definition of an injective function.



This means that $|Gal(E/F)| leq |S_n| = n!$, however due to having constructed a homomorphism, we have mapped a group to another group, hence we have mapped $Gal(E/F)$ to a subgroup of $S_n$, whose order divides $|S_n|$ and therefore $|Gal(E/F)|$ divides $n!$, completing the proof.



Question



I am wondering whether my proof for this is correct, I think that it is mostly there, with the statement




we can conclude that $sigma$ and $phi$ can be different if and only if they act differently on X




perhaps being the only issue.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am currently working through Joseph Rotman's book "Galois Theory" and am trying to prove the following theorem.




If $f(x) in F[x]$ has $n$ distinct roots in its splitting field $E$, then Gal($E/F$) is isomorphic to a subgroup of the symmetric group $S_n$, thus its order is a divisor of $n!$.




I have struggled to understand the proof in the book and have therefore tried to write my own proof of this fact, I have found some questions close to this on this site, but haven't been able to find exactly what I'm looking for.



My proof (so far) is as follows:



Proof:



Let $X = {alpha_1, ... , alpha_n }$ be the set of roots of $f(x)$, as $E$ is the splitting field of $f$, it may be written as $E = F(alpha_1, ... , alpha_n)$ and noting that $alpha_i neq alpha_j$ for $ineq j$. Let $sigma in$ Gal($E/F$) then $sigma(X) = X$ (a result from an earlier lemma). Now I would like to construct an injective homomorphism from $Gal(E/F)$ to $S_n$, my guess is the map which sends $sigma$ to its restriction in $X$, which I shall denote by $sigma_X$. Let $g$ be this map, then it is clear that $g$ is a homomorphism.



Now I try to show that $g$ is injective, consider $sigma , phi in Gal(E/F)$ where $sigma neq phi$, both of these functions are F-automorphisms of $E/F$, so they "fix" $F$, then we can conclude that $sigma$ and $phi$ can be different if and only if they act differently on $X$, which in the language of mathematics is precisely $sigma neq phi Leftrightarrow sigma_X neq phi_X$. This is the definition of an injective function.



This means that $|Gal(E/F)| leq |S_n| = n!$, however due to having constructed a homomorphism, we have mapped a group to another group, hence we have mapped $Gal(E/F)$ to a subgroup of $S_n$, whose order divides $|S_n|$ and therefore $|Gal(E/F)|$ divides $n!$, completing the proof.



Question



I am wondering whether my proof for this is correct, I think that it is mostly there, with the statement




we can conclude that $sigma$ and $phi$ can be different if and only if they act differently on X




perhaps being the only issue.







group-theory proof-verification galois-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 30 '18 at 17:58









Shaun

11.1k113688




11.1k113688










asked Dec 30 '18 at 16:36









J.JonesJ.Jones

83




83












  • $begingroup$
    If $ sigma $ fixes all elements of $ X $, then it fixes the splitting field $ E $ as well. So $ sigma $ must be the identity and hence your map is injective.
    $endgroup$
    – hellHound
    Dec 30 '18 at 17:26










  • $begingroup$
    Use $operatorname{Gal}(E/F)$ for $operatorname{Gal}(E/F)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Dec 30 '18 at 17:59










  • $begingroup$
    > implying $E/F$ is galois
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Dec 31 '18 at 13:54


















  • $begingroup$
    If $ sigma $ fixes all elements of $ X $, then it fixes the splitting field $ E $ as well. So $ sigma $ must be the identity and hence your map is injective.
    $endgroup$
    – hellHound
    Dec 30 '18 at 17:26










  • $begingroup$
    Use $operatorname{Gal}(E/F)$ for $operatorname{Gal}(E/F)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Dec 30 '18 at 17:59










  • $begingroup$
    > implying $E/F$ is galois
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Dec 31 '18 at 13:54
















$begingroup$
If $ sigma $ fixes all elements of $ X $, then it fixes the splitting field $ E $ as well. So $ sigma $ must be the identity and hence your map is injective.
$endgroup$
– hellHound
Dec 30 '18 at 17:26




$begingroup$
If $ sigma $ fixes all elements of $ X $, then it fixes the splitting field $ E $ as well. So $ sigma $ must be the identity and hence your map is injective.
$endgroup$
– hellHound
Dec 30 '18 at 17:26












$begingroup$
Use $operatorname{Gal}(E/F)$ for $operatorname{Gal}(E/F)$.
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Dec 30 '18 at 17:59




$begingroup$
Use $operatorname{Gal}(E/F)$ for $operatorname{Gal}(E/F)$.
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Dec 30 '18 at 17:59












$begingroup$
> implying $E/F$ is galois
$endgroup$
– Kenny Lau
Dec 31 '18 at 13:54




$begingroup$
> implying $E/F$ is galois
$endgroup$
– Kenny Lau
Dec 31 '18 at 13:54










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Assume $sigma_X = varphi_X$, i.e. $forall i, sigma(alpha_i) = varphi(alpha_i)$. We shall show that $sigma = varphi$, i.e. $forall x in E, sigma(x) = varphi(x)$.



Now note that $E = F(alpha_1, cdots, alpha_n)$, and every $alpha_i$ is algebraic over $F$, so every $x in E$ can be expressed as a polynomial in $(alpha_i)_{i=1}^n$ with coefficients in $F$, say $x = sum f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}}$. Then:



$$begin{array}{rcll}
sigma(x) &=& sigma left( sum f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}} right) \
&=& sum sigma left( f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}} right) & text {$sigma$ preserves addition} \
&=& sum sigma left( f_j right) sigma left( alpha_{1} right)^{v_{j1}} sigma left( alpha_{2} right)^{v_{j2}} cdots sigma left( alpha_{n} right)^{v_{jn}} & text {$sigma$ preserves multiplication} \
&=& sum f_j sigma left( alpha_{1} right)^{v_{j1}} sigma left( alpha_{2} right)^{v_{j2}} cdots sigma left( alpha_{n} right)^{v_{jn}} & text {$sigma$ fixes $F$} \
&=& sum f_j varphi left( alpha_{1} right)^{v_{j1}} varphi left( alpha_{2} right)^{v_{j2}} cdots varphi left( alpha_{n} right)^{v_{jn}} & forall i, sigma(alpha_i) = varphi(alpha_i) \
&=& sum varphi left( f_j right) varphi left( alpha_{1} right)^{v_{j1}} varphi left( alpha_{2} right)^{v_{j2}} cdots varphi left( alpha_{n} right)^{v_{jn}} & text {$varphi$ fixes $F$} \
&=& sum varphi left( f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}} right) & text {$varphi$ preserves multiplication} \
&=& varphi left( sum f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}} right) & text {$varphi$ preserves addition} \
&=& varphi(x)
end{array}$$



which is what was to be demonstrated.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056994%2fgalois-groups-are-isomorphic-to-subgroups-of-symmetric-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Assume $sigma_X = varphi_X$, i.e. $forall i, sigma(alpha_i) = varphi(alpha_i)$. We shall show that $sigma = varphi$, i.e. $forall x in E, sigma(x) = varphi(x)$.



    Now note that $E = F(alpha_1, cdots, alpha_n)$, and every $alpha_i$ is algebraic over $F$, so every $x in E$ can be expressed as a polynomial in $(alpha_i)_{i=1}^n$ with coefficients in $F$, say $x = sum f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}}$. Then:



    $$begin{array}{rcll}
    sigma(x) &=& sigma left( sum f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}} right) \
    &=& sum sigma left( f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}} right) & text {$sigma$ preserves addition} \
    &=& sum sigma left( f_j right) sigma left( alpha_{1} right)^{v_{j1}} sigma left( alpha_{2} right)^{v_{j2}} cdots sigma left( alpha_{n} right)^{v_{jn}} & text {$sigma$ preserves multiplication} \
    &=& sum f_j sigma left( alpha_{1} right)^{v_{j1}} sigma left( alpha_{2} right)^{v_{j2}} cdots sigma left( alpha_{n} right)^{v_{jn}} & text {$sigma$ fixes $F$} \
    &=& sum f_j varphi left( alpha_{1} right)^{v_{j1}} varphi left( alpha_{2} right)^{v_{j2}} cdots varphi left( alpha_{n} right)^{v_{jn}} & forall i, sigma(alpha_i) = varphi(alpha_i) \
    &=& sum varphi left( f_j right) varphi left( alpha_{1} right)^{v_{j1}} varphi left( alpha_{2} right)^{v_{j2}} cdots varphi left( alpha_{n} right)^{v_{jn}} & text {$varphi$ fixes $F$} \
    &=& sum varphi left( f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}} right) & text {$varphi$ preserves multiplication} \
    &=& varphi left( sum f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}} right) & text {$varphi$ preserves addition} \
    &=& varphi(x)
    end{array}$$



    which is what was to be demonstrated.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Assume $sigma_X = varphi_X$, i.e. $forall i, sigma(alpha_i) = varphi(alpha_i)$. We shall show that $sigma = varphi$, i.e. $forall x in E, sigma(x) = varphi(x)$.



      Now note that $E = F(alpha_1, cdots, alpha_n)$, and every $alpha_i$ is algebraic over $F$, so every $x in E$ can be expressed as a polynomial in $(alpha_i)_{i=1}^n$ with coefficients in $F$, say $x = sum f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}}$. Then:



      $$begin{array}{rcll}
      sigma(x) &=& sigma left( sum f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}} right) \
      &=& sum sigma left( f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}} right) & text {$sigma$ preserves addition} \
      &=& sum sigma left( f_j right) sigma left( alpha_{1} right)^{v_{j1}} sigma left( alpha_{2} right)^{v_{j2}} cdots sigma left( alpha_{n} right)^{v_{jn}} & text {$sigma$ preserves multiplication} \
      &=& sum f_j sigma left( alpha_{1} right)^{v_{j1}} sigma left( alpha_{2} right)^{v_{j2}} cdots sigma left( alpha_{n} right)^{v_{jn}} & text {$sigma$ fixes $F$} \
      &=& sum f_j varphi left( alpha_{1} right)^{v_{j1}} varphi left( alpha_{2} right)^{v_{j2}} cdots varphi left( alpha_{n} right)^{v_{jn}} & forall i, sigma(alpha_i) = varphi(alpha_i) \
      &=& sum varphi left( f_j right) varphi left( alpha_{1} right)^{v_{j1}} varphi left( alpha_{2} right)^{v_{j2}} cdots varphi left( alpha_{n} right)^{v_{jn}} & text {$varphi$ fixes $F$} \
      &=& sum varphi left( f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}} right) & text {$varphi$ preserves multiplication} \
      &=& varphi left( sum f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}} right) & text {$varphi$ preserves addition} \
      &=& varphi(x)
      end{array}$$



      which is what was to be demonstrated.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Assume $sigma_X = varphi_X$, i.e. $forall i, sigma(alpha_i) = varphi(alpha_i)$. We shall show that $sigma = varphi$, i.e. $forall x in E, sigma(x) = varphi(x)$.



        Now note that $E = F(alpha_1, cdots, alpha_n)$, and every $alpha_i$ is algebraic over $F$, so every $x in E$ can be expressed as a polynomial in $(alpha_i)_{i=1}^n$ with coefficients in $F$, say $x = sum f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}}$. Then:



        $$begin{array}{rcll}
        sigma(x) &=& sigma left( sum f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}} right) \
        &=& sum sigma left( f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}} right) & text {$sigma$ preserves addition} \
        &=& sum sigma left( f_j right) sigma left( alpha_{1} right)^{v_{j1}} sigma left( alpha_{2} right)^{v_{j2}} cdots sigma left( alpha_{n} right)^{v_{jn}} & text {$sigma$ preserves multiplication} \
        &=& sum f_j sigma left( alpha_{1} right)^{v_{j1}} sigma left( alpha_{2} right)^{v_{j2}} cdots sigma left( alpha_{n} right)^{v_{jn}} & text {$sigma$ fixes $F$} \
        &=& sum f_j varphi left( alpha_{1} right)^{v_{j1}} varphi left( alpha_{2} right)^{v_{j2}} cdots varphi left( alpha_{n} right)^{v_{jn}} & forall i, sigma(alpha_i) = varphi(alpha_i) \
        &=& sum varphi left( f_j right) varphi left( alpha_{1} right)^{v_{j1}} varphi left( alpha_{2} right)^{v_{j2}} cdots varphi left( alpha_{n} right)^{v_{jn}} & text {$varphi$ fixes $F$} \
        &=& sum varphi left( f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}} right) & text {$varphi$ preserves multiplication} \
        &=& varphi left( sum f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}} right) & text {$varphi$ preserves addition} \
        &=& varphi(x)
        end{array}$$



        which is what was to be demonstrated.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Assume $sigma_X = varphi_X$, i.e. $forall i, sigma(alpha_i) = varphi(alpha_i)$. We shall show that $sigma = varphi$, i.e. $forall x in E, sigma(x) = varphi(x)$.



        Now note that $E = F(alpha_1, cdots, alpha_n)$, and every $alpha_i$ is algebraic over $F$, so every $x in E$ can be expressed as a polynomial in $(alpha_i)_{i=1}^n$ with coefficients in $F$, say $x = sum f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}}$. Then:



        $$begin{array}{rcll}
        sigma(x) &=& sigma left( sum f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}} right) \
        &=& sum sigma left( f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}} right) & text {$sigma$ preserves addition} \
        &=& sum sigma left( f_j right) sigma left( alpha_{1} right)^{v_{j1}} sigma left( alpha_{2} right)^{v_{j2}} cdots sigma left( alpha_{n} right)^{v_{jn}} & text {$sigma$ preserves multiplication} \
        &=& sum f_j sigma left( alpha_{1} right)^{v_{j1}} sigma left( alpha_{2} right)^{v_{j2}} cdots sigma left( alpha_{n} right)^{v_{jn}} & text {$sigma$ fixes $F$} \
        &=& sum f_j varphi left( alpha_{1} right)^{v_{j1}} varphi left( alpha_{2} right)^{v_{j2}} cdots varphi left( alpha_{n} right)^{v_{jn}} & forall i, sigma(alpha_i) = varphi(alpha_i) \
        &=& sum varphi left( f_j right) varphi left( alpha_{1} right)^{v_{j1}} varphi left( alpha_{2} right)^{v_{j2}} cdots varphi left( alpha_{n} right)^{v_{jn}} & text {$varphi$ fixes $F$} \
        &=& sum varphi left( f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}} right) & text {$varphi$ preserves multiplication} \
        &=& varphi left( sum f_j alpha_{1}^{v_{j1}} alpha_{2}^{v_{j2}} cdots alpha_{n}^{v_{jn}} right) & text {$varphi$ preserves addition} \
        &=& varphi(x)
        end{array}$$



        which is what was to be demonstrated.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 31 '18 at 14:04









        Kenny LauKenny Lau

        20.1k2260




        20.1k2260






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056994%2fgalois-groups-are-isomorphic-to-subgroups-of-symmetric-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Verónica Boquete

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten