if $A in C^{2015,2015}$ and $rank(A) 15$












4












$begingroup$


I want to solve that thesis:

if $A in C^{2015,2015}$ and $rank(A) < 1000$ proof that $dim(ker(A+A^T)) > 15 $



from the fact that $$dim(im(A)) = dim(im(A^T))$$ and
$$ dim(ker(A))+dim(im(A))=n $$
it follows that
$$dim(ker(A)) = dim(ker(A^T))$$
We know that $rank(A) < 1000$. Hence $dim(ker(A))>1015$
But there I have stuck...
thanks for your time










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    4












    $begingroup$


    I want to solve that thesis:

    if $A in C^{2015,2015}$ and $rank(A) < 1000$ proof that $dim(ker(A+A^T)) > 15 $



    from the fact that $$dim(im(A)) = dim(im(A^T))$$ and
    $$ dim(ker(A))+dim(im(A))=n $$
    it follows that
    $$dim(ker(A)) = dim(ker(A^T))$$
    We know that $rank(A) < 1000$. Hence $dim(ker(A))>1015$
    But there I have stuck...
    thanks for your time










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      I want to solve that thesis:

      if $A in C^{2015,2015}$ and $rank(A) < 1000$ proof that $dim(ker(A+A^T)) > 15 $



      from the fact that $$dim(im(A)) = dim(im(A^T))$$ and
      $$ dim(ker(A))+dim(im(A))=n $$
      it follows that
      $$dim(ker(A)) = dim(ker(A^T))$$
      We know that $rank(A) < 1000$. Hence $dim(ker(A))>1015$
      But there I have stuck...
      thanks for your time










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I want to solve that thesis:

      if $A in C^{2015,2015}$ and $rank(A) < 1000$ proof that $dim(ker(A+A^T)) > 15 $



      from the fact that $$dim(im(A)) = dim(im(A^T))$$ and
      $$ dim(ker(A))+dim(im(A))=n $$
      it follows that
      $$dim(ker(A)) = dim(ker(A^T))$$
      We know that $rank(A) < 1000$. Hence $dim(ker(A))>1015$
      But there I have stuck...
      thanks for your time







      linear-algebra matrices matrix-rank






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 30 '18 at 15:20









      Yanko

      8,6922830




      8,6922830










      asked Dec 30 '18 at 15:18









      VirtualUserVirtualUser

      1,329317




      1,329317






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6












          $begingroup$

          You're one line from the solution:



          You showed that $dim (ker A) > 1015$ (so $A$ sends a vector space of dimension $1015$ to zero).



          Moreover since $dim (Im A ) = dim (Im A^T)$ you also have that the dimensions of the kernels equal and so $dim(ker A^T)>1015$.



          Therefore by the dimensions theorem we have that the dimension of $ker A cap ker A^T$ is at least $15$ (because $dim(ker A + ker A^T)leq 2015$). This completes the proof, because $ker (A+A^T)$ contains $ker Acap ker A^T$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Sorry if it is stupid question but I am sitting and I have no idea why $ dim(ker A + ker A^T)leq 2015$. Could I ask you for an explanation?
            $endgroup$
            – VirtualUser
            Dec 30 '18 at 15:45










          • $begingroup$
            @VirtualUser Both $ker A$ and $ker A^T$ are subspaces of $mathbb{C}^{2015}$. Therefore so is their sum.
            $endgroup$
            – Yanko
            Dec 30 '18 at 15:47












          • $begingroup$
            "Therefore by the dimensions theorem we have that the dimension of $ker A cap ker A^T$ is at least $15$ (because $dim(ker A + ker A^T)leq 2015$)." Ok but how from dimensions theorem I get this proposal? Dimension theorem says that $dim(im(T)) + dim(kernel(T)) = n $, but there, If we assume that T is $ ker A + ker A^T$ I haven't got neither dim(im(T)) nor dim(kernel(T))
            $endgroup$
            – VirtualUser
            Dec 30 '18 at 16:04












          • $begingroup$
            @VirtualUser This is the other dimension theorem. I'm talking about this $dim (U+W) = dim U + dim W - dim Ucap W$. Insert $U=ker A$ and $W=ker A^T$.
            $endgroup$
            – Yanko
            Dec 30 '18 at 16:05










          • $begingroup$
            Aaah, now I understand, you deserve a lot of thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – VirtualUser
            Dec 30 '18 at 16:07



















          2












          $begingroup$

          Hint: $operatorname{dim}(operatorname {im}(A+A^t)=operatorname{dim}(operatorname{im}A)+operatorname{dim}(operatorname{im}A^t)-operatorname{dim}(operatorname{im}Acapoperatorname{im}A^t)lt2000$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            No, using the hypothesis, less than $1000+1000=2000$.
            $endgroup$
            – Chris Custer
            Dec 30 '18 at 15:43












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056924%2fif-a-in-c2015-2015-and-ranka-1000-proof-that-dim-keraat-15%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          6












          $begingroup$

          You're one line from the solution:



          You showed that $dim (ker A) > 1015$ (so $A$ sends a vector space of dimension $1015$ to zero).



          Moreover since $dim (Im A ) = dim (Im A^T)$ you also have that the dimensions of the kernels equal and so $dim(ker A^T)>1015$.



          Therefore by the dimensions theorem we have that the dimension of $ker A cap ker A^T$ is at least $15$ (because $dim(ker A + ker A^T)leq 2015$). This completes the proof, because $ker (A+A^T)$ contains $ker Acap ker A^T$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Sorry if it is stupid question but I am sitting and I have no idea why $ dim(ker A + ker A^T)leq 2015$. Could I ask you for an explanation?
            $endgroup$
            – VirtualUser
            Dec 30 '18 at 15:45










          • $begingroup$
            @VirtualUser Both $ker A$ and $ker A^T$ are subspaces of $mathbb{C}^{2015}$. Therefore so is their sum.
            $endgroup$
            – Yanko
            Dec 30 '18 at 15:47












          • $begingroup$
            "Therefore by the dimensions theorem we have that the dimension of $ker A cap ker A^T$ is at least $15$ (because $dim(ker A + ker A^T)leq 2015$)." Ok but how from dimensions theorem I get this proposal? Dimension theorem says that $dim(im(T)) + dim(kernel(T)) = n $, but there, If we assume that T is $ ker A + ker A^T$ I haven't got neither dim(im(T)) nor dim(kernel(T))
            $endgroup$
            – VirtualUser
            Dec 30 '18 at 16:04












          • $begingroup$
            @VirtualUser This is the other dimension theorem. I'm talking about this $dim (U+W) = dim U + dim W - dim Ucap W$. Insert $U=ker A$ and $W=ker A^T$.
            $endgroup$
            – Yanko
            Dec 30 '18 at 16:05










          • $begingroup$
            Aaah, now I understand, you deserve a lot of thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – VirtualUser
            Dec 30 '18 at 16:07
















          6












          $begingroup$

          You're one line from the solution:



          You showed that $dim (ker A) > 1015$ (so $A$ sends a vector space of dimension $1015$ to zero).



          Moreover since $dim (Im A ) = dim (Im A^T)$ you also have that the dimensions of the kernels equal and so $dim(ker A^T)>1015$.



          Therefore by the dimensions theorem we have that the dimension of $ker A cap ker A^T$ is at least $15$ (because $dim(ker A + ker A^T)leq 2015$). This completes the proof, because $ker (A+A^T)$ contains $ker Acap ker A^T$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Sorry if it is stupid question but I am sitting and I have no idea why $ dim(ker A + ker A^T)leq 2015$. Could I ask you for an explanation?
            $endgroup$
            – VirtualUser
            Dec 30 '18 at 15:45










          • $begingroup$
            @VirtualUser Both $ker A$ and $ker A^T$ are subspaces of $mathbb{C}^{2015}$. Therefore so is their sum.
            $endgroup$
            – Yanko
            Dec 30 '18 at 15:47












          • $begingroup$
            "Therefore by the dimensions theorem we have that the dimension of $ker A cap ker A^T$ is at least $15$ (because $dim(ker A + ker A^T)leq 2015$)." Ok but how from dimensions theorem I get this proposal? Dimension theorem says that $dim(im(T)) + dim(kernel(T)) = n $, but there, If we assume that T is $ ker A + ker A^T$ I haven't got neither dim(im(T)) nor dim(kernel(T))
            $endgroup$
            – VirtualUser
            Dec 30 '18 at 16:04












          • $begingroup$
            @VirtualUser This is the other dimension theorem. I'm talking about this $dim (U+W) = dim U + dim W - dim Ucap W$. Insert $U=ker A$ and $W=ker A^T$.
            $endgroup$
            – Yanko
            Dec 30 '18 at 16:05










          • $begingroup$
            Aaah, now I understand, you deserve a lot of thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – VirtualUser
            Dec 30 '18 at 16:07














          6












          6








          6





          $begingroup$

          You're one line from the solution:



          You showed that $dim (ker A) > 1015$ (so $A$ sends a vector space of dimension $1015$ to zero).



          Moreover since $dim (Im A ) = dim (Im A^T)$ you also have that the dimensions of the kernels equal and so $dim(ker A^T)>1015$.



          Therefore by the dimensions theorem we have that the dimension of $ker A cap ker A^T$ is at least $15$ (because $dim(ker A + ker A^T)leq 2015$). This completes the proof, because $ker (A+A^T)$ contains $ker Acap ker A^T$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          You're one line from the solution:



          You showed that $dim (ker A) > 1015$ (so $A$ sends a vector space of dimension $1015$ to zero).



          Moreover since $dim (Im A ) = dim (Im A^T)$ you also have that the dimensions of the kernels equal and so $dim(ker A^T)>1015$.



          Therefore by the dimensions theorem we have that the dimension of $ker A cap ker A^T$ is at least $15$ (because $dim(ker A + ker A^T)leq 2015$). This completes the proof, because $ker (A+A^T)$ contains $ker Acap ker A^T$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 30 '18 at 15:23









          YankoYanko

          8,6922830




          8,6922830












          • $begingroup$
            Sorry if it is stupid question but I am sitting and I have no idea why $ dim(ker A + ker A^T)leq 2015$. Could I ask you for an explanation?
            $endgroup$
            – VirtualUser
            Dec 30 '18 at 15:45










          • $begingroup$
            @VirtualUser Both $ker A$ and $ker A^T$ are subspaces of $mathbb{C}^{2015}$. Therefore so is their sum.
            $endgroup$
            – Yanko
            Dec 30 '18 at 15:47












          • $begingroup$
            "Therefore by the dimensions theorem we have that the dimension of $ker A cap ker A^T$ is at least $15$ (because $dim(ker A + ker A^T)leq 2015$)." Ok but how from dimensions theorem I get this proposal? Dimension theorem says that $dim(im(T)) + dim(kernel(T)) = n $, but there, If we assume that T is $ ker A + ker A^T$ I haven't got neither dim(im(T)) nor dim(kernel(T))
            $endgroup$
            – VirtualUser
            Dec 30 '18 at 16:04












          • $begingroup$
            @VirtualUser This is the other dimension theorem. I'm talking about this $dim (U+W) = dim U + dim W - dim Ucap W$. Insert $U=ker A$ and $W=ker A^T$.
            $endgroup$
            – Yanko
            Dec 30 '18 at 16:05










          • $begingroup$
            Aaah, now I understand, you deserve a lot of thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – VirtualUser
            Dec 30 '18 at 16:07


















          • $begingroup$
            Sorry if it is stupid question but I am sitting and I have no idea why $ dim(ker A + ker A^T)leq 2015$. Could I ask you for an explanation?
            $endgroup$
            – VirtualUser
            Dec 30 '18 at 15:45










          • $begingroup$
            @VirtualUser Both $ker A$ and $ker A^T$ are subspaces of $mathbb{C}^{2015}$. Therefore so is their sum.
            $endgroup$
            – Yanko
            Dec 30 '18 at 15:47












          • $begingroup$
            "Therefore by the dimensions theorem we have that the dimension of $ker A cap ker A^T$ is at least $15$ (because $dim(ker A + ker A^T)leq 2015$)." Ok but how from dimensions theorem I get this proposal? Dimension theorem says that $dim(im(T)) + dim(kernel(T)) = n $, but there, If we assume that T is $ ker A + ker A^T$ I haven't got neither dim(im(T)) nor dim(kernel(T))
            $endgroup$
            – VirtualUser
            Dec 30 '18 at 16:04












          • $begingroup$
            @VirtualUser This is the other dimension theorem. I'm talking about this $dim (U+W) = dim U + dim W - dim Ucap W$. Insert $U=ker A$ and $W=ker A^T$.
            $endgroup$
            – Yanko
            Dec 30 '18 at 16:05










          • $begingroup$
            Aaah, now I understand, you deserve a lot of thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – VirtualUser
            Dec 30 '18 at 16:07
















          $begingroup$
          Sorry if it is stupid question but I am sitting and I have no idea why $ dim(ker A + ker A^T)leq 2015$. Could I ask you for an explanation?
          $endgroup$
          – VirtualUser
          Dec 30 '18 at 15:45




          $begingroup$
          Sorry if it is stupid question but I am sitting and I have no idea why $ dim(ker A + ker A^T)leq 2015$. Could I ask you for an explanation?
          $endgroup$
          – VirtualUser
          Dec 30 '18 at 15:45












          $begingroup$
          @VirtualUser Both $ker A$ and $ker A^T$ are subspaces of $mathbb{C}^{2015}$. Therefore so is their sum.
          $endgroup$
          – Yanko
          Dec 30 '18 at 15:47






          $begingroup$
          @VirtualUser Both $ker A$ and $ker A^T$ are subspaces of $mathbb{C}^{2015}$. Therefore so is their sum.
          $endgroup$
          – Yanko
          Dec 30 '18 at 15:47














          $begingroup$
          "Therefore by the dimensions theorem we have that the dimension of $ker A cap ker A^T$ is at least $15$ (because $dim(ker A + ker A^T)leq 2015$)." Ok but how from dimensions theorem I get this proposal? Dimension theorem says that $dim(im(T)) + dim(kernel(T)) = n $, but there, If we assume that T is $ ker A + ker A^T$ I haven't got neither dim(im(T)) nor dim(kernel(T))
          $endgroup$
          – VirtualUser
          Dec 30 '18 at 16:04






          $begingroup$
          "Therefore by the dimensions theorem we have that the dimension of $ker A cap ker A^T$ is at least $15$ (because $dim(ker A + ker A^T)leq 2015$)." Ok but how from dimensions theorem I get this proposal? Dimension theorem says that $dim(im(T)) + dim(kernel(T)) = n $, but there, If we assume that T is $ ker A + ker A^T$ I haven't got neither dim(im(T)) nor dim(kernel(T))
          $endgroup$
          – VirtualUser
          Dec 30 '18 at 16:04














          $begingroup$
          @VirtualUser This is the other dimension theorem. I'm talking about this $dim (U+W) = dim U + dim W - dim Ucap W$. Insert $U=ker A$ and $W=ker A^T$.
          $endgroup$
          – Yanko
          Dec 30 '18 at 16:05




          $begingroup$
          @VirtualUser This is the other dimension theorem. I'm talking about this $dim (U+W) = dim U + dim W - dim Ucap W$. Insert $U=ker A$ and $W=ker A^T$.
          $endgroup$
          – Yanko
          Dec 30 '18 at 16:05












          $begingroup$
          Aaah, now I understand, you deserve a lot of thanks!
          $endgroup$
          – VirtualUser
          Dec 30 '18 at 16:07




          $begingroup$
          Aaah, now I understand, you deserve a lot of thanks!
          $endgroup$
          – VirtualUser
          Dec 30 '18 at 16:07











          2












          $begingroup$

          Hint: $operatorname{dim}(operatorname {im}(A+A^t)=operatorname{dim}(operatorname{im}A)+operatorname{dim}(operatorname{im}A^t)-operatorname{dim}(operatorname{im}Acapoperatorname{im}A^t)lt2000$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            No, using the hypothesis, less than $1000+1000=2000$.
            $endgroup$
            – Chris Custer
            Dec 30 '18 at 15:43
















          2












          $begingroup$

          Hint: $operatorname{dim}(operatorname {im}(A+A^t)=operatorname{dim}(operatorname{im}A)+operatorname{dim}(operatorname{im}A^t)-operatorname{dim}(operatorname{im}Acapoperatorname{im}A^t)lt2000$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            No, using the hypothesis, less than $1000+1000=2000$.
            $endgroup$
            – Chris Custer
            Dec 30 '18 at 15:43














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          Hint: $operatorname{dim}(operatorname {im}(A+A^t)=operatorname{dim}(operatorname{im}A)+operatorname{dim}(operatorname{im}A^t)-operatorname{dim}(operatorname{im}Acapoperatorname{im}A^t)lt2000$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Hint: $operatorname{dim}(operatorname {im}(A+A^t)=operatorname{dim}(operatorname{im}A)+operatorname{dim}(operatorname{im}A^t)-operatorname{dim}(operatorname{im}Acapoperatorname{im}A^t)lt2000$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 30 '18 at 15:34









          Chris CusterChris Custer

          14.5k3827




          14.5k3827












          • $begingroup$
            No, using the hypothesis, less than $1000+1000=2000$.
            $endgroup$
            – Chris Custer
            Dec 30 '18 at 15:43


















          • $begingroup$
            No, using the hypothesis, less than $1000+1000=2000$.
            $endgroup$
            – Chris Custer
            Dec 30 '18 at 15:43
















          $begingroup$
          No, using the hypothesis, less than $1000+1000=2000$.
          $endgroup$
          – Chris Custer
          Dec 30 '18 at 15:43




          $begingroup$
          No, using the hypothesis, less than $1000+1000=2000$.
          $endgroup$
          – Chris Custer
          Dec 30 '18 at 15:43


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056924%2fif-a-in-c2015-2015-and-ranka-1000-proof-that-dim-keraat-15%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bundesstraße 106

          Verónica Boquete

          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten