@AuraEnabled Method will execute in synchronous or asynchronous?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I have an apex class associated with lightning component. I have @AuraEnabled methods inside my apex class. Now do I have to use @future(callout=true) method to execute asynchronously ?



Simply my question is,
Is it required to call @Future(callout=true) from @auraEnabled Method if I want to make a asynchronous callout?



Adding below question after comments from David



If I want to make an asynchronous callout(As my external system is time consuming and I don't have requirement to show the response in UI), do I have to call Future method from AuraEnabled method ? or by default it will execute asynchronously?










share|improve this question






























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    I have an apex class associated with lightning component. I have @AuraEnabled methods inside my apex class. Now do I have to use @future(callout=true) method to execute asynchronously ?



    Simply my question is,
    Is it required to call @Future(callout=true) from @auraEnabled Method if I want to make a asynchronous callout?



    Adding below question after comments from David



    If I want to make an asynchronous callout(As my external system is time consuming and I don't have requirement to show the response in UI), do I have to call Future method from AuraEnabled method ? or by default it will execute asynchronously?










    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      I have an apex class associated with lightning component. I have @AuraEnabled methods inside my apex class. Now do I have to use @future(callout=true) method to execute asynchronously ?



      Simply my question is,
      Is it required to call @Future(callout=true) from @auraEnabled Method if I want to make a asynchronous callout?



      Adding below question after comments from David



      If I want to make an asynchronous callout(As my external system is time consuming and I don't have requirement to show the response in UI), do I have to call Future method from AuraEnabled method ? or by default it will execute asynchronously?










      share|improve this question















      I have an apex class associated with lightning component. I have @AuraEnabled methods inside my apex class. Now do I have to use @future(callout=true) method to execute asynchronously ?



      Simply my question is,
      Is it required to call @Future(callout=true) from @auraEnabled Method if I want to make a asynchronous callout?



      Adding below question after comments from David



      If I want to make an asynchronous callout(As my external system is time consuming and I don't have requirement to show the response in UI), do I have to call Future method from AuraEnabled method ? or by default it will execute asynchronously?







      apex lightning






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited yesterday

























      asked yesterday









      Manu Tej

      555




      555






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          5
          down vote



          accepted











          Is it required to call @Future(callout=true) from @auraEnabled Method if I want to make a asynchronous callout?




          If you want to make an asynchronous callout (you do not wait for the result and don't receive a response that you can return to your Lightning component), then yes, you'd need to use an @future method. You might use this, for example, if you need to push data into a remote system but don't need to wait for a response, or if you're firing a long-running remote process and don't want to wait to return a value to the client-side JavaScript controller.



          However, it is legal to make a callout from within an @AuraEnabled controller method. If you're calling a web service to return data to your JavaScript controller, you must call the service synchronously, without using @future. This ensures you'll receive a response in the same transaction that you can return to the client-side. For example, this is just fine (in abbreviated example form):



          @AuraEnabled
          public static serviceResponse getStationTimetable(String station) {

          Http http = new Http();
          HttpRequest req = new HttpRequest();
          req.setEndpoint('SOME_ENDPOINT' + EncodingUtil.urlEncode(station, 'UTF-8'));
          req.setMethod('GET');

          HttpResponse res = http.send(req);

          return JSON.deserialize(res.getBody(), serviceResponse.class);
          }


          What does Asynchronous Mean Anyway?



          Let's be clear about our terms here, because we have several layers of functionality that can be described as either synchronous or asynchronous.



          From the client side, in your JavaScript controller, you invoke server actions asynchronously. This means that you enqueue the action and let the framework take over from there, understanding that you'll get a callback when the action completes successfully or unsuccessfully. You don't block waiting for the response.



          On the server side, an @AuraEnabled method executes synchronously - i.e., at the moment it's called by the Lightning framework, and in a single transaction. It's not enqueued on the server in the way that an @future or Queueable would be.



          Callouts are really always executed synchronously when you look at the send() method itself. When you fire a callout, your transaction waits for the results. The distinction is that you cannot fire callouts from certain types of Apex (specifically, triggers), and for this reason we push them into an asynchronous Apex context, such as an @future method or a Queueable.



          They still execute synchronously in that context, but from the perspective of the Apex code that started the operation (such as the trigger, or an @AuraEnabled method), the callout takes place asynchronously and in a separate transaction. That's what we mean when we talk about an asynchronous callout in Apex.






          share|improve this answer























          • You mean by default @AuraEnabled method will run Synchronously ?
            – Manu Tej
            yesterday








          • 1




            In the sense that it runs in a single Apex transaction, yes. From the JavaScript controller's perspective, the server action is asynchronous.
            – David Reed
            yesterday










          • It doesn't make sense to call future method from @auraEnabled method as it is already asynchronous.
            – Gourav
            yesterday










          • @Gourav I agree that it would be unusual, but I can imagine a situation where it was desired, particularly with a non-performant or badly-behaved web service.
            – David Reed
            yesterday










          • If I want to make an asynchronous callout(As my external system is time consuming and I don't have requirement to show the response in UI), do I have to call Future method from AuraEnabled method ? or by default it will execute asynchronously?
            – Manu Tej
            yesterday


















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          The Apex code called from the Lightning Controller is synchronous. I think your misunderstanding comes from the idea that you need to perform a callout asynchronously. This is not true. The only time you need to perform a callout asynchronously is if you've already started or completed at least one DML operation in the current transaction. This means that callouts performed from triggers must always be asynchronous. The rest of the time, such as in Visualforce or Lightning controllers, you do not need to perform a callout asynchronously as long as you do not violate the DML-before-callout rule.






          share|improve this answer























          • +1 from me. I guess only thing that confuses me is the first line. Call from controller to apex being synchronous!
            – codeyinthecloud
            yesterday








          • 2




            @codeyinthecloud No, you're right, it was a bit confusing. I've clarified. The problem is that you have two systems (client, server); from the client side, the call is asynchronous, but from the server side, it is synchronous code (and has synchronous code limits as defined by governor limits).
            – sfdcfox
            yesterday


















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          $A.enqueueAction(action which calls the @auraEnabled method) adds the server-side controller action to the queue of actions to be executed. All actions that are enqueued will run at the end of the event loop. Rather than sending a separate request for each individual action, the framework processes the event chain and batches the actions in the queue into one request.




          The actions are asynchronous and have callbacks. These actions are asynchronous for server round trips. And also because of the queuing you won't see concurrent execution here.




          Future Methods :




          A future method runs in the background, asynchronously. You can call a
          future method for executing long-running operations, such as callouts
          to external Web services or any operation you’d like to run in its own
          thread, on its own time.




          You can also make use of future methods to isolate DML operations on different sObject types to prevent the mixed DML error. Each future method is queued and executes when system resources become available. That way, the execution of your code doesn’t have to wait for the completion of a long-running operation. A benefit of using future methods is that some governor limits are higher, such as SOQL query limits and heap size limits.



          To your question. Yes you do have to call a future method to make an Asynchronous callout from server side if not you will have to do a client side AJAX callout. But like @DavidReed and @sfdcfox suggested you don't necessarily need an asynchronous callout in context of a lightning component!






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1




            ... but it's quite all right to make a synchronous callout from the body of an @AuraEnabled method. I think the synchronous/asynchronous thing is extra confusing here.
            – David Reed
            yesterday






          • 2




            @DavidReed I agree. The term actions are asyncronous is confusing as they are only in the context of server trips as they run their own transaction thread. But when it comes to server as far as its concerned its just a single thread which is synchronous in its own nature.
            – codeyinthecloud
            yesterday











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "459"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f239994%2fauraenabled-method-will-execute-in-synchronous-or-asynchronous%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes








          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          5
          down vote



          accepted











          Is it required to call @Future(callout=true) from @auraEnabled Method if I want to make a asynchronous callout?




          If you want to make an asynchronous callout (you do not wait for the result and don't receive a response that you can return to your Lightning component), then yes, you'd need to use an @future method. You might use this, for example, if you need to push data into a remote system but don't need to wait for a response, or if you're firing a long-running remote process and don't want to wait to return a value to the client-side JavaScript controller.



          However, it is legal to make a callout from within an @AuraEnabled controller method. If you're calling a web service to return data to your JavaScript controller, you must call the service synchronously, without using @future. This ensures you'll receive a response in the same transaction that you can return to the client-side. For example, this is just fine (in abbreviated example form):



          @AuraEnabled
          public static serviceResponse getStationTimetable(String station) {

          Http http = new Http();
          HttpRequest req = new HttpRequest();
          req.setEndpoint('SOME_ENDPOINT' + EncodingUtil.urlEncode(station, 'UTF-8'));
          req.setMethod('GET');

          HttpResponse res = http.send(req);

          return JSON.deserialize(res.getBody(), serviceResponse.class);
          }


          What does Asynchronous Mean Anyway?



          Let's be clear about our terms here, because we have several layers of functionality that can be described as either synchronous or asynchronous.



          From the client side, in your JavaScript controller, you invoke server actions asynchronously. This means that you enqueue the action and let the framework take over from there, understanding that you'll get a callback when the action completes successfully or unsuccessfully. You don't block waiting for the response.



          On the server side, an @AuraEnabled method executes synchronously - i.e., at the moment it's called by the Lightning framework, and in a single transaction. It's not enqueued on the server in the way that an @future or Queueable would be.



          Callouts are really always executed synchronously when you look at the send() method itself. When you fire a callout, your transaction waits for the results. The distinction is that you cannot fire callouts from certain types of Apex (specifically, triggers), and for this reason we push them into an asynchronous Apex context, such as an @future method or a Queueable.



          They still execute synchronously in that context, but from the perspective of the Apex code that started the operation (such as the trigger, or an @AuraEnabled method), the callout takes place asynchronously and in a separate transaction. That's what we mean when we talk about an asynchronous callout in Apex.






          share|improve this answer























          • You mean by default @AuraEnabled method will run Synchronously ?
            – Manu Tej
            yesterday








          • 1




            In the sense that it runs in a single Apex transaction, yes. From the JavaScript controller's perspective, the server action is asynchronous.
            – David Reed
            yesterday










          • It doesn't make sense to call future method from @auraEnabled method as it is already asynchronous.
            – Gourav
            yesterday










          • @Gourav I agree that it would be unusual, but I can imagine a situation where it was desired, particularly with a non-performant or badly-behaved web service.
            – David Reed
            yesterday










          • If I want to make an asynchronous callout(As my external system is time consuming and I don't have requirement to show the response in UI), do I have to call Future method from AuraEnabled method ? or by default it will execute asynchronously?
            – Manu Tej
            yesterday















          up vote
          5
          down vote



          accepted











          Is it required to call @Future(callout=true) from @auraEnabled Method if I want to make a asynchronous callout?




          If you want to make an asynchronous callout (you do not wait for the result and don't receive a response that you can return to your Lightning component), then yes, you'd need to use an @future method. You might use this, for example, if you need to push data into a remote system but don't need to wait for a response, or if you're firing a long-running remote process and don't want to wait to return a value to the client-side JavaScript controller.



          However, it is legal to make a callout from within an @AuraEnabled controller method. If you're calling a web service to return data to your JavaScript controller, you must call the service synchronously, without using @future. This ensures you'll receive a response in the same transaction that you can return to the client-side. For example, this is just fine (in abbreviated example form):



          @AuraEnabled
          public static serviceResponse getStationTimetable(String station) {

          Http http = new Http();
          HttpRequest req = new HttpRequest();
          req.setEndpoint('SOME_ENDPOINT' + EncodingUtil.urlEncode(station, 'UTF-8'));
          req.setMethod('GET');

          HttpResponse res = http.send(req);

          return JSON.deserialize(res.getBody(), serviceResponse.class);
          }


          What does Asynchronous Mean Anyway?



          Let's be clear about our terms here, because we have several layers of functionality that can be described as either synchronous or asynchronous.



          From the client side, in your JavaScript controller, you invoke server actions asynchronously. This means that you enqueue the action and let the framework take over from there, understanding that you'll get a callback when the action completes successfully or unsuccessfully. You don't block waiting for the response.



          On the server side, an @AuraEnabled method executes synchronously - i.e., at the moment it's called by the Lightning framework, and in a single transaction. It's not enqueued on the server in the way that an @future or Queueable would be.



          Callouts are really always executed synchronously when you look at the send() method itself. When you fire a callout, your transaction waits for the results. The distinction is that you cannot fire callouts from certain types of Apex (specifically, triggers), and for this reason we push them into an asynchronous Apex context, such as an @future method or a Queueable.



          They still execute synchronously in that context, but from the perspective of the Apex code that started the operation (such as the trigger, or an @AuraEnabled method), the callout takes place asynchronously and in a separate transaction. That's what we mean when we talk about an asynchronous callout in Apex.






          share|improve this answer























          • You mean by default @AuraEnabled method will run Synchronously ?
            – Manu Tej
            yesterday








          • 1




            In the sense that it runs in a single Apex transaction, yes. From the JavaScript controller's perspective, the server action is asynchronous.
            – David Reed
            yesterday










          • It doesn't make sense to call future method from @auraEnabled method as it is already asynchronous.
            – Gourav
            yesterday










          • @Gourav I agree that it would be unusual, but I can imagine a situation where it was desired, particularly with a non-performant or badly-behaved web service.
            – David Reed
            yesterday










          • If I want to make an asynchronous callout(As my external system is time consuming and I don't have requirement to show the response in UI), do I have to call Future method from AuraEnabled method ? or by default it will execute asynchronously?
            – Manu Tej
            yesterday













          up vote
          5
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          5
          down vote



          accepted







          Is it required to call @Future(callout=true) from @auraEnabled Method if I want to make a asynchronous callout?




          If you want to make an asynchronous callout (you do not wait for the result and don't receive a response that you can return to your Lightning component), then yes, you'd need to use an @future method. You might use this, for example, if you need to push data into a remote system but don't need to wait for a response, or if you're firing a long-running remote process and don't want to wait to return a value to the client-side JavaScript controller.



          However, it is legal to make a callout from within an @AuraEnabled controller method. If you're calling a web service to return data to your JavaScript controller, you must call the service synchronously, without using @future. This ensures you'll receive a response in the same transaction that you can return to the client-side. For example, this is just fine (in abbreviated example form):



          @AuraEnabled
          public static serviceResponse getStationTimetable(String station) {

          Http http = new Http();
          HttpRequest req = new HttpRequest();
          req.setEndpoint('SOME_ENDPOINT' + EncodingUtil.urlEncode(station, 'UTF-8'));
          req.setMethod('GET');

          HttpResponse res = http.send(req);

          return JSON.deserialize(res.getBody(), serviceResponse.class);
          }


          What does Asynchronous Mean Anyway?



          Let's be clear about our terms here, because we have several layers of functionality that can be described as either synchronous or asynchronous.



          From the client side, in your JavaScript controller, you invoke server actions asynchronously. This means that you enqueue the action and let the framework take over from there, understanding that you'll get a callback when the action completes successfully or unsuccessfully. You don't block waiting for the response.



          On the server side, an @AuraEnabled method executes synchronously - i.e., at the moment it's called by the Lightning framework, and in a single transaction. It's not enqueued on the server in the way that an @future or Queueable would be.



          Callouts are really always executed synchronously when you look at the send() method itself. When you fire a callout, your transaction waits for the results. The distinction is that you cannot fire callouts from certain types of Apex (specifically, triggers), and for this reason we push them into an asynchronous Apex context, such as an @future method or a Queueable.



          They still execute synchronously in that context, but from the perspective of the Apex code that started the operation (such as the trigger, or an @AuraEnabled method), the callout takes place asynchronously and in a separate transaction. That's what we mean when we talk about an asynchronous callout in Apex.






          share|improve this answer















          Is it required to call @Future(callout=true) from @auraEnabled Method if I want to make a asynchronous callout?




          If you want to make an asynchronous callout (you do not wait for the result and don't receive a response that you can return to your Lightning component), then yes, you'd need to use an @future method. You might use this, for example, if you need to push data into a remote system but don't need to wait for a response, or if you're firing a long-running remote process and don't want to wait to return a value to the client-side JavaScript controller.



          However, it is legal to make a callout from within an @AuraEnabled controller method. If you're calling a web service to return data to your JavaScript controller, you must call the service synchronously, without using @future. This ensures you'll receive a response in the same transaction that you can return to the client-side. For example, this is just fine (in abbreviated example form):



          @AuraEnabled
          public static serviceResponse getStationTimetable(String station) {

          Http http = new Http();
          HttpRequest req = new HttpRequest();
          req.setEndpoint('SOME_ENDPOINT' + EncodingUtil.urlEncode(station, 'UTF-8'));
          req.setMethod('GET');

          HttpResponse res = http.send(req);

          return JSON.deserialize(res.getBody(), serviceResponse.class);
          }


          What does Asynchronous Mean Anyway?



          Let's be clear about our terms here, because we have several layers of functionality that can be described as either synchronous or asynchronous.



          From the client side, in your JavaScript controller, you invoke server actions asynchronously. This means that you enqueue the action and let the framework take over from there, understanding that you'll get a callback when the action completes successfully or unsuccessfully. You don't block waiting for the response.



          On the server side, an @AuraEnabled method executes synchronously - i.e., at the moment it's called by the Lightning framework, and in a single transaction. It's not enqueued on the server in the way that an @future or Queueable would be.



          Callouts are really always executed synchronously when you look at the send() method itself. When you fire a callout, your transaction waits for the results. The distinction is that you cannot fire callouts from certain types of Apex (specifically, triggers), and for this reason we push them into an asynchronous Apex context, such as an @future method or a Queueable.



          They still execute synchronously in that context, but from the perspective of the Apex code that started the operation (such as the trigger, or an @AuraEnabled method), the callout takes place asynchronously and in a separate transaction. That's what we mean when we talk about an asynchronous callout in Apex.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited yesterday

























          answered yesterday









          David Reed

          25.9k51644




          25.9k51644












          • You mean by default @AuraEnabled method will run Synchronously ?
            – Manu Tej
            yesterday








          • 1




            In the sense that it runs in a single Apex transaction, yes. From the JavaScript controller's perspective, the server action is asynchronous.
            – David Reed
            yesterday










          • It doesn't make sense to call future method from @auraEnabled method as it is already asynchronous.
            – Gourav
            yesterday










          • @Gourav I agree that it would be unusual, but I can imagine a situation where it was desired, particularly with a non-performant or badly-behaved web service.
            – David Reed
            yesterday










          • If I want to make an asynchronous callout(As my external system is time consuming and I don't have requirement to show the response in UI), do I have to call Future method from AuraEnabled method ? or by default it will execute asynchronously?
            – Manu Tej
            yesterday


















          • You mean by default @AuraEnabled method will run Synchronously ?
            – Manu Tej
            yesterday








          • 1




            In the sense that it runs in a single Apex transaction, yes. From the JavaScript controller's perspective, the server action is asynchronous.
            – David Reed
            yesterday










          • It doesn't make sense to call future method from @auraEnabled method as it is already asynchronous.
            – Gourav
            yesterday










          • @Gourav I agree that it would be unusual, but I can imagine a situation where it was desired, particularly with a non-performant or badly-behaved web service.
            – David Reed
            yesterday










          • If I want to make an asynchronous callout(As my external system is time consuming and I don't have requirement to show the response in UI), do I have to call Future method from AuraEnabled method ? or by default it will execute asynchronously?
            – Manu Tej
            yesterday
















          You mean by default @AuraEnabled method will run Synchronously ?
          – Manu Tej
          yesterday






          You mean by default @AuraEnabled method will run Synchronously ?
          – Manu Tej
          yesterday






          1




          1




          In the sense that it runs in a single Apex transaction, yes. From the JavaScript controller's perspective, the server action is asynchronous.
          – David Reed
          yesterday




          In the sense that it runs in a single Apex transaction, yes. From the JavaScript controller's perspective, the server action is asynchronous.
          – David Reed
          yesterday












          It doesn't make sense to call future method from @auraEnabled method as it is already asynchronous.
          – Gourav
          yesterday




          It doesn't make sense to call future method from @auraEnabled method as it is already asynchronous.
          – Gourav
          yesterday












          @Gourav I agree that it would be unusual, but I can imagine a situation where it was desired, particularly with a non-performant or badly-behaved web service.
          – David Reed
          yesterday




          @Gourav I agree that it would be unusual, but I can imagine a situation where it was desired, particularly with a non-performant or badly-behaved web service.
          – David Reed
          yesterday












          If I want to make an asynchronous callout(As my external system is time consuming and I don't have requirement to show the response in UI), do I have to call Future method from AuraEnabled method ? or by default it will execute asynchronously?
          – Manu Tej
          yesterday




          If I want to make an asynchronous callout(As my external system is time consuming and I don't have requirement to show the response in UI), do I have to call Future method from AuraEnabled method ? or by default it will execute asynchronously?
          – Manu Tej
          yesterday












          up vote
          3
          down vote













          The Apex code called from the Lightning Controller is synchronous. I think your misunderstanding comes from the idea that you need to perform a callout asynchronously. This is not true. The only time you need to perform a callout asynchronously is if you've already started or completed at least one DML operation in the current transaction. This means that callouts performed from triggers must always be asynchronous. The rest of the time, such as in Visualforce or Lightning controllers, you do not need to perform a callout asynchronously as long as you do not violate the DML-before-callout rule.






          share|improve this answer























          • +1 from me. I guess only thing that confuses me is the first line. Call from controller to apex being synchronous!
            – codeyinthecloud
            yesterday








          • 2




            @codeyinthecloud No, you're right, it was a bit confusing. I've clarified. The problem is that you have two systems (client, server); from the client side, the call is asynchronous, but from the server side, it is synchronous code (and has synchronous code limits as defined by governor limits).
            – sfdcfox
            yesterday















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          The Apex code called from the Lightning Controller is synchronous. I think your misunderstanding comes from the idea that you need to perform a callout asynchronously. This is not true. The only time you need to perform a callout asynchronously is if you've already started or completed at least one DML operation in the current transaction. This means that callouts performed from triggers must always be asynchronous. The rest of the time, such as in Visualforce or Lightning controllers, you do not need to perform a callout asynchronously as long as you do not violate the DML-before-callout rule.






          share|improve this answer























          • +1 from me. I guess only thing that confuses me is the first line. Call from controller to apex being synchronous!
            – codeyinthecloud
            yesterday








          • 2




            @codeyinthecloud No, you're right, it was a bit confusing. I've clarified. The problem is that you have two systems (client, server); from the client side, the call is asynchronous, but from the server side, it is synchronous code (and has synchronous code limits as defined by governor limits).
            – sfdcfox
            yesterday













          up vote
          3
          down vote










          up vote
          3
          down vote









          The Apex code called from the Lightning Controller is synchronous. I think your misunderstanding comes from the idea that you need to perform a callout asynchronously. This is not true. The only time you need to perform a callout asynchronously is if you've already started or completed at least one DML operation in the current transaction. This means that callouts performed from triggers must always be asynchronous. The rest of the time, such as in Visualforce or Lightning controllers, you do not need to perform a callout asynchronously as long as you do not violate the DML-before-callout rule.






          share|improve this answer














          The Apex code called from the Lightning Controller is synchronous. I think your misunderstanding comes from the idea that you need to perform a callout asynchronously. This is not true. The only time you need to perform a callout asynchronously is if you've already started or completed at least one DML operation in the current transaction. This means that callouts performed from triggers must always be asynchronous. The rest of the time, such as in Visualforce or Lightning controllers, you do not need to perform a callout asynchronously as long as you do not violate the DML-before-callout rule.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited yesterday

























          answered yesterday









          sfdcfox

          240k10182402




          240k10182402












          • +1 from me. I guess only thing that confuses me is the first line. Call from controller to apex being synchronous!
            – codeyinthecloud
            yesterday








          • 2




            @codeyinthecloud No, you're right, it was a bit confusing. I've clarified. The problem is that you have two systems (client, server); from the client side, the call is asynchronous, but from the server side, it is synchronous code (and has synchronous code limits as defined by governor limits).
            – sfdcfox
            yesterday


















          • +1 from me. I guess only thing that confuses me is the first line. Call from controller to apex being synchronous!
            – codeyinthecloud
            yesterday








          • 2




            @codeyinthecloud No, you're right, it was a bit confusing. I've clarified. The problem is that you have two systems (client, server); from the client side, the call is asynchronous, but from the server side, it is synchronous code (and has synchronous code limits as defined by governor limits).
            – sfdcfox
            yesterday
















          +1 from me. I guess only thing that confuses me is the first line. Call from controller to apex being synchronous!
          – codeyinthecloud
          yesterday






          +1 from me. I guess only thing that confuses me is the first line. Call from controller to apex being synchronous!
          – codeyinthecloud
          yesterday






          2




          2




          @codeyinthecloud No, you're right, it was a bit confusing. I've clarified. The problem is that you have two systems (client, server); from the client side, the call is asynchronous, but from the server side, it is synchronous code (and has synchronous code limits as defined by governor limits).
          – sfdcfox
          yesterday




          @codeyinthecloud No, you're right, it was a bit confusing. I've clarified. The problem is that you have two systems (client, server); from the client side, the call is asynchronous, but from the server side, it is synchronous code (and has synchronous code limits as defined by governor limits).
          – sfdcfox
          yesterday










          up vote
          1
          down vote













          $A.enqueueAction(action which calls the @auraEnabled method) adds the server-side controller action to the queue of actions to be executed. All actions that are enqueued will run at the end of the event loop. Rather than sending a separate request for each individual action, the framework processes the event chain and batches the actions in the queue into one request.




          The actions are asynchronous and have callbacks. These actions are asynchronous for server round trips. And also because of the queuing you won't see concurrent execution here.




          Future Methods :




          A future method runs in the background, asynchronously. You can call a
          future method for executing long-running operations, such as callouts
          to external Web services or any operation you’d like to run in its own
          thread, on its own time.




          You can also make use of future methods to isolate DML operations on different sObject types to prevent the mixed DML error. Each future method is queued and executes when system resources become available. That way, the execution of your code doesn’t have to wait for the completion of a long-running operation. A benefit of using future methods is that some governor limits are higher, such as SOQL query limits and heap size limits.



          To your question. Yes you do have to call a future method to make an Asynchronous callout from server side if not you will have to do a client side AJAX callout. But like @DavidReed and @sfdcfox suggested you don't necessarily need an asynchronous callout in context of a lightning component!






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1




            ... but it's quite all right to make a synchronous callout from the body of an @AuraEnabled method. I think the synchronous/asynchronous thing is extra confusing here.
            – David Reed
            yesterday






          • 2




            @DavidReed I agree. The term actions are asyncronous is confusing as they are only in the context of server trips as they run their own transaction thread. But when it comes to server as far as its concerned its just a single thread which is synchronous in its own nature.
            – codeyinthecloud
            yesterday















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          $A.enqueueAction(action which calls the @auraEnabled method) adds the server-side controller action to the queue of actions to be executed. All actions that are enqueued will run at the end of the event loop. Rather than sending a separate request for each individual action, the framework processes the event chain and batches the actions in the queue into one request.




          The actions are asynchronous and have callbacks. These actions are asynchronous for server round trips. And also because of the queuing you won't see concurrent execution here.




          Future Methods :




          A future method runs in the background, asynchronously. You can call a
          future method for executing long-running operations, such as callouts
          to external Web services or any operation you’d like to run in its own
          thread, on its own time.




          You can also make use of future methods to isolate DML operations on different sObject types to prevent the mixed DML error. Each future method is queued and executes when system resources become available. That way, the execution of your code doesn’t have to wait for the completion of a long-running operation. A benefit of using future methods is that some governor limits are higher, such as SOQL query limits and heap size limits.



          To your question. Yes you do have to call a future method to make an Asynchronous callout from server side if not you will have to do a client side AJAX callout. But like @DavidReed and @sfdcfox suggested you don't necessarily need an asynchronous callout in context of a lightning component!






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1




            ... but it's quite all right to make a synchronous callout from the body of an @AuraEnabled method. I think the synchronous/asynchronous thing is extra confusing here.
            – David Reed
            yesterday






          • 2




            @DavidReed I agree. The term actions are asyncronous is confusing as they are only in the context of server trips as they run their own transaction thread. But when it comes to server as far as its concerned its just a single thread which is synchronous in its own nature.
            – codeyinthecloud
            yesterday













          up vote
          1
          down vote










          up vote
          1
          down vote









          $A.enqueueAction(action which calls the @auraEnabled method) adds the server-side controller action to the queue of actions to be executed. All actions that are enqueued will run at the end of the event loop. Rather than sending a separate request for each individual action, the framework processes the event chain and batches the actions in the queue into one request.




          The actions are asynchronous and have callbacks. These actions are asynchronous for server round trips. And also because of the queuing you won't see concurrent execution here.




          Future Methods :




          A future method runs in the background, asynchronously. You can call a
          future method for executing long-running operations, such as callouts
          to external Web services or any operation you’d like to run in its own
          thread, on its own time.




          You can also make use of future methods to isolate DML operations on different sObject types to prevent the mixed DML error. Each future method is queued and executes when system resources become available. That way, the execution of your code doesn’t have to wait for the completion of a long-running operation. A benefit of using future methods is that some governor limits are higher, such as SOQL query limits and heap size limits.



          To your question. Yes you do have to call a future method to make an Asynchronous callout from server side if not you will have to do a client side AJAX callout. But like @DavidReed and @sfdcfox suggested you don't necessarily need an asynchronous callout in context of a lightning component!






          share|improve this answer














          $A.enqueueAction(action which calls the @auraEnabled method) adds the server-side controller action to the queue of actions to be executed. All actions that are enqueued will run at the end of the event loop. Rather than sending a separate request for each individual action, the framework processes the event chain and batches the actions in the queue into one request.




          The actions are asynchronous and have callbacks. These actions are asynchronous for server round trips. And also because of the queuing you won't see concurrent execution here.




          Future Methods :




          A future method runs in the background, asynchronously. You can call a
          future method for executing long-running operations, such as callouts
          to external Web services or any operation you’d like to run in its own
          thread, on its own time.




          You can also make use of future methods to isolate DML operations on different sObject types to prevent the mixed DML error. Each future method is queued and executes when system resources become available. That way, the execution of your code doesn’t have to wait for the completion of a long-running operation. A benefit of using future methods is that some governor limits are higher, such as SOQL query limits and heap size limits.



          To your question. Yes you do have to call a future method to make an Asynchronous callout from server side if not you will have to do a client side AJAX callout. But like @DavidReed and @sfdcfox suggested you don't necessarily need an asynchronous callout in context of a lightning component!







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited yesterday

























          answered yesterday









          codeyinthecloud

          2,329320




          2,329320








          • 1




            ... but it's quite all right to make a synchronous callout from the body of an @AuraEnabled method. I think the synchronous/asynchronous thing is extra confusing here.
            – David Reed
            yesterday






          • 2




            @DavidReed I agree. The term actions are asyncronous is confusing as they are only in the context of server trips as they run their own transaction thread. But when it comes to server as far as its concerned its just a single thread which is synchronous in its own nature.
            – codeyinthecloud
            yesterday














          • 1




            ... but it's quite all right to make a synchronous callout from the body of an @AuraEnabled method. I think the synchronous/asynchronous thing is extra confusing here.
            – David Reed
            yesterday






          • 2




            @DavidReed I agree. The term actions are asyncronous is confusing as they are only in the context of server trips as they run their own transaction thread. But when it comes to server as far as its concerned its just a single thread which is synchronous in its own nature.
            – codeyinthecloud
            yesterday








          1




          1




          ... but it's quite all right to make a synchronous callout from the body of an @AuraEnabled method. I think the synchronous/asynchronous thing is extra confusing here.
          – David Reed
          yesterday




          ... but it's quite all right to make a synchronous callout from the body of an @AuraEnabled method. I think the synchronous/asynchronous thing is extra confusing here.
          – David Reed
          yesterday




          2




          2




          @DavidReed I agree. The term actions are asyncronous is confusing as they are only in the context of server trips as they run their own transaction thread. But when it comes to server as far as its concerned its just a single thread which is synchronous in its own nature.
          – codeyinthecloud
          yesterday




          @DavidReed I agree. The term actions are asyncronous is confusing as they are only in the context of server trips as they run their own transaction thread. But when it comes to server as far as its concerned its just a single thread which is synchronous in its own nature.
          – codeyinthecloud
          yesterday


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f239994%2fauraenabled-method-will-execute-in-synchronous-or-asynchronous%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bundesstraße 106

          Verónica Boquete

          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten