Prove that quotient map is covering map











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












I'm self-studying algebraic topology and need help with the following problem (I'm only at part a.)



enter image description here



The relevant definitions are as follows.




Definition: Let F be a discrete space and X be any space. Then X $times$ F is a disjoint union of copies of X, indexed by F. The projection $pi:$ X $times$ F $to$ X is called a trivial covering.



Definition: A map $p:tilde{X} to X$ is a covering map if it is locally a trivial covering. That is, if X has an open cover ${N_alpha: alpha in A}$ by trivializing neighborhoods for p, i.e. there exists discrete $F_alpha$, and a homeomorphism $varphi_alpha: p^{-1}(N_alpha) to N_alpha times F_alpha$ such that $p = pi circ varphi_alpha$ on $p^{-1}(N_alpha)$.




In terms of diagram, my interpretation of the problem is as follows.



enter image description here



To show that $p$ is a covering map, I guess I'd have to find the discrete space $F$ and the homeomorphism $varphi_alpha$, but I don't know how to proceed. Also, I understand that $mathbb{R}P^n$ is the space obtained by identifying antipodal points of $S^n$, but I can't figure out what its open sets look like.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    I'm self-studying algebraic topology and need help with the following problem (I'm only at part a.)



    enter image description here



    The relevant definitions are as follows.




    Definition: Let F be a discrete space and X be any space. Then X $times$ F is a disjoint union of copies of X, indexed by F. The projection $pi:$ X $times$ F $to$ X is called a trivial covering.



    Definition: A map $p:tilde{X} to X$ is a covering map if it is locally a trivial covering. That is, if X has an open cover ${N_alpha: alpha in A}$ by trivializing neighborhoods for p, i.e. there exists discrete $F_alpha$, and a homeomorphism $varphi_alpha: p^{-1}(N_alpha) to N_alpha times F_alpha$ such that $p = pi circ varphi_alpha$ on $p^{-1}(N_alpha)$.




    In terms of diagram, my interpretation of the problem is as follows.



    enter image description here



    To show that $p$ is a covering map, I guess I'd have to find the discrete space $F$ and the homeomorphism $varphi_alpha$, but I don't know how to proceed. Also, I understand that $mathbb{R}P^n$ is the space obtained by identifying antipodal points of $S^n$, but I can't figure out what its open sets look like.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      I'm self-studying algebraic topology and need help with the following problem (I'm only at part a.)



      enter image description here



      The relevant definitions are as follows.




      Definition: Let F be a discrete space and X be any space. Then X $times$ F is a disjoint union of copies of X, indexed by F. The projection $pi:$ X $times$ F $to$ X is called a trivial covering.



      Definition: A map $p:tilde{X} to X$ is a covering map if it is locally a trivial covering. That is, if X has an open cover ${N_alpha: alpha in A}$ by trivializing neighborhoods for p, i.e. there exists discrete $F_alpha$, and a homeomorphism $varphi_alpha: p^{-1}(N_alpha) to N_alpha times F_alpha$ such that $p = pi circ varphi_alpha$ on $p^{-1}(N_alpha)$.




      In terms of diagram, my interpretation of the problem is as follows.



      enter image description here



      To show that $p$ is a covering map, I guess I'd have to find the discrete space $F$ and the homeomorphism $varphi_alpha$, but I don't know how to proceed. Also, I understand that $mathbb{R}P^n$ is the space obtained by identifying antipodal points of $S^n$, but I can't figure out what its open sets look like.










      share|cite|improve this question















      I'm self-studying algebraic topology and need help with the following problem (I'm only at part a.)



      enter image description here



      The relevant definitions are as follows.




      Definition: Let F be a discrete space and X be any space. Then X $times$ F is a disjoint union of copies of X, indexed by F. The projection $pi:$ X $times$ F $to$ X is called a trivial covering.



      Definition: A map $p:tilde{X} to X$ is a covering map if it is locally a trivial covering. That is, if X has an open cover ${N_alpha: alpha in A}$ by trivializing neighborhoods for p, i.e. there exists discrete $F_alpha$, and a homeomorphism $varphi_alpha: p^{-1}(N_alpha) to N_alpha times F_alpha$ such that $p = pi circ varphi_alpha$ on $p^{-1}(N_alpha)$.




      In terms of diagram, my interpretation of the problem is as follows.



      enter image description here



      To show that $p$ is a covering map, I guess I'd have to find the discrete space $F$ and the homeomorphism $varphi_alpha$, but I don't know how to proceed. Also, I understand that $mathbb{R}P^n$ is the space obtained by identifying antipodal points of $S^n$, but I can't figure out what its open sets look like.







      algebraic-topology covering-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 15 at 22:59

























      asked Nov 15 at 20:43









      ensbana

      265113




      265113






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Your picture is misleading because it assumes that $p$ is a trivial covering. This is not true, it is only a locally trivial covering. To see that, define
          $U_i^pm = { (x_1,dots,x_{n+1}) in S^n mid (-1)^{pm 1} x_i > 0}$. These set are the intersections of $S^n$ with open half-spaces in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, thus open subsets of $S^n$. Note that the $U_i^pm$ cover $S^n$.



          We have $x= (x_1,dots,x_{n+1}) in U_i^+$ if and only if $- x = (-x_1,dots,-x_{n+1}) in U_i^-$. Hence $p(U_i^+) = p(U_i^-)$, and we denote this subset of $mathbb{R}P^n$ by $V_i$.



          $V_i$ is open in $mathbb{R}P^n$ because $p^{-1}(V_i) = U_i^+ cup U_i^-$. Clearly $p_i^pm : U_i^pm stackrel{p}{rightarrow} V_i$ is a bijection. It is even a homeomorphism because it maps open sets to open sets.



          Now let $F = {+1,-1 }$. Then we get a homeomorphism
          $$phi_i : p^{-1}(V_i) to V_i times F, phi_(x) =
          begin{cases}
          (p_i^+(x),+1) & x in U_i^+ \
          (p_i^-(x),-1) & x in U_i^-
          end{cases}
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000299%2fprove-that-quotient-map-is-covering-map%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Your picture is misleading because it assumes that $p$ is a trivial covering. This is not true, it is only a locally trivial covering. To see that, define
            $U_i^pm = { (x_1,dots,x_{n+1}) in S^n mid (-1)^{pm 1} x_i > 0}$. These set are the intersections of $S^n$ with open half-spaces in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, thus open subsets of $S^n$. Note that the $U_i^pm$ cover $S^n$.



            We have $x= (x_1,dots,x_{n+1}) in U_i^+$ if and only if $- x = (-x_1,dots,-x_{n+1}) in U_i^-$. Hence $p(U_i^+) = p(U_i^-)$, and we denote this subset of $mathbb{R}P^n$ by $V_i$.



            $V_i$ is open in $mathbb{R}P^n$ because $p^{-1}(V_i) = U_i^+ cup U_i^-$. Clearly $p_i^pm : U_i^pm stackrel{p}{rightarrow} V_i$ is a bijection. It is even a homeomorphism because it maps open sets to open sets.



            Now let $F = {+1,-1 }$. Then we get a homeomorphism
            $$phi_i : p^{-1}(V_i) to V_i times F, phi_(x) =
            begin{cases}
            (p_i^+(x),+1) & x in U_i^+ \
            (p_i^-(x),-1) & x in U_i^-
            end{cases}
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer



























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Your picture is misleading because it assumes that $p$ is a trivial covering. This is not true, it is only a locally trivial covering. To see that, define
              $U_i^pm = { (x_1,dots,x_{n+1}) in S^n mid (-1)^{pm 1} x_i > 0}$. These set are the intersections of $S^n$ with open half-spaces in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, thus open subsets of $S^n$. Note that the $U_i^pm$ cover $S^n$.



              We have $x= (x_1,dots,x_{n+1}) in U_i^+$ if and only if $- x = (-x_1,dots,-x_{n+1}) in U_i^-$. Hence $p(U_i^+) = p(U_i^-)$, and we denote this subset of $mathbb{R}P^n$ by $V_i$.



              $V_i$ is open in $mathbb{R}P^n$ because $p^{-1}(V_i) = U_i^+ cup U_i^-$. Clearly $p_i^pm : U_i^pm stackrel{p}{rightarrow} V_i$ is a bijection. It is even a homeomorphism because it maps open sets to open sets.



              Now let $F = {+1,-1 }$. Then we get a homeomorphism
              $$phi_i : p^{-1}(V_i) to V_i times F, phi_(x) =
              begin{cases}
              (p_i^+(x),+1) & x in U_i^+ \
              (p_i^-(x),-1) & x in U_i^-
              end{cases}
              $$






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                0
                down vote










                up vote
                0
                down vote









                Your picture is misleading because it assumes that $p$ is a trivial covering. This is not true, it is only a locally trivial covering. To see that, define
                $U_i^pm = { (x_1,dots,x_{n+1}) in S^n mid (-1)^{pm 1} x_i > 0}$. These set are the intersections of $S^n$ with open half-spaces in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, thus open subsets of $S^n$. Note that the $U_i^pm$ cover $S^n$.



                We have $x= (x_1,dots,x_{n+1}) in U_i^+$ if and only if $- x = (-x_1,dots,-x_{n+1}) in U_i^-$. Hence $p(U_i^+) = p(U_i^-)$, and we denote this subset of $mathbb{R}P^n$ by $V_i$.



                $V_i$ is open in $mathbb{R}P^n$ because $p^{-1}(V_i) = U_i^+ cup U_i^-$. Clearly $p_i^pm : U_i^pm stackrel{p}{rightarrow} V_i$ is a bijection. It is even a homeomorphism because it maps open sets to open sets.



                Now let $F = {+1,-1 }$. Then we get a homeomorphism
                $$phi_i : p^{-1}(V_i) to V_i times F, phi_(x) =
                begin{cases}
                (p_i^+(x),+1) & x in U_i^+ \
                (p_i^-(x),-1) & x in U_i^-
                end{cases}
                $$






                share|cite|improve this answer














                Your picture is misleading because it assumes that $p$ is a trivial covering. This is not true, it is only a locally trivial covering. To see that, define
                $U_i^pm = { (x_1,dots,x_{n+1}) in S^n mid (-1)^{pm 1} x_i > 0}$. These set are the intersections of $S^n$ with open half-spaces in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, thus open subsets of $S^n$. Note that the $U_i^pm$ cover $S^n$.



                We have $x= (x_1,dots,x_{n+1}) in U_i^+$ if and only if $- x = (-x_1,dots,-x_{n+1}) in U_i^-$. Hence $p(U_i^+) = p(U_i^-)$, and we denote this subset of $mathbb{R}P^n$ by $V_i$.



                $V_i$ is open in $mathbb{R}P^n$ because $p^{-1}(V_i) = U_i^+ cup U_i^-$. Clearly $p_i^pm : U_i^pm stackrel{p}{rightarrow} V_i$ is a bijection. It is even a homeomorphism because it maps open sets to open sets.



                Now let $F = {+1,-1 }$. Then we get a homeomorphism
                $$phi_i : p^{-1}(V_i) to V_i times F, phi_(x) =
                begin{cases}
                (p_i^+(x),+1) & x in U_i^+ \
                (p_i^-(x),-1) & x in U_i^-
                end{cases}
                $$







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Nov 16 at 23:25

























                answered Nov 15 at 23:36









                Paul Frost

                7,3991527




                7,3991527






























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded



















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000299%2fprove-that-quotient-map-is-covering-map%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bundesstraße 106

                    Verónica Boquete

                    Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten