Finding eigenfunctions and eigenvalues from a differential equation
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Consider the differential equation
$$X''(x)+lambda X=0$$
on $0 leq x leq 1$with boundary conditions
$$X'(0)+X(0)=0 text{and} X(1)=0.$$
I have a few problems here that I think I figured out, but I would appreciate another look or some hints as to what I can fix. Or, maybe I am totally wrong!
$textbf{My first goal:}$
Find an eigenfunction associated with eigenvalue $lambda=0.$
An eigenvalue $lambda =0$ would mean that $X''(x)=0$. This means that the solution takes the form
$$X(x)=Ax+B.$$
Since $X'(0)=A$ and $X(0)=B$,
$$X'(0)+X(0)=0 iff A=-B.$$
Therefore an eigenfunction that works would be $boxed{X_{0}(x)=-2x+2}.$
$textbf{My second goal:}$
Find an expression for all eigenvalues $lambda = beta ^2>0.$
This one requires a little more work. The solution to $X'(x)+beta ^2 X=0$ takes the form
$$X(x)=Acosbeta x +Bsin beta x.$$
Taking derivatives, one easily finds that $X'(0)=Bbeta$ and $X(0)=A.$ Thus we obtain
$$Bbeta + A=0 implies beta= frac{-A}{B}.$$
Finally, this gives $boxed{beta=frac{A^2}{B^2}}$
What are your thoughts? Thanks in advance!
Edit: I just realized that my last problem did not necessarily satisfy $X(1)=0.$
differential-equations pde eigenfunctions
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Consider the differential equation
$$X''(x)+lambda X=0$$
on $0 leq x leq 1$with boundary conditions
$$X'(0)+X(0)=0 text{and} X(1)=0.$$
I have a few problems here that I think I figured out, but I would appreciate another look or some hints as to what I can fix. Or, maybe I am totally wrong!
$textbf{My first goal:}$
Find an eigenfunction associated with eigenvalue $lambda=0.$
An eigenvalue $lambda =0$ would mean that $X''(x)=0$. This means that the solution takes the form
$$X(x)=Ax+B.$$
Since $X'(0)=A$ and $X(0)=B$,
$$X'(0)+X(0)=0 iff A=-B.$$
Therefore an eigenfunction that works would be $boxed{X_{0}(x)=-2x+2}.$
$textbf{My second goal:}$
Find an expression for all eigenvalues $lambda = beta ^2>0.$
This one requires a little more work. The solution to $X'(x)+beta ^2 X=0$ takes the form
$$X(x)=Acosbeta x +Bsin beta x.$$
Taking derivatives, one easily finds that $X'(0)=Bbeta$ and $X(0)=A.$ Thus we obtain
$$Bbeta + A=0 implies beta= frac{-A}{B}.$$
Finally, this gives $boxed{beta=frac{A^2}{B^2}}$
What are your thoughts? Thanks in advance!
Edit: I just realized that my last problem did not necessarily satisfy $X(1)=0.$
differential-equations pde eigenfunctions
1
First goal, a better eigenfunction would be $$X(x) = Ax - A, quad forall A in mathbb{R}$$ Always try to keep it as general as possible. Second goal, applying both boundary conditions yields begin{align} beta &= -frac{A}{B} \ &= tan beta end{align} and using the oddness of $tan( cdot)$, we get $$lambda = tan^{2}(sqrt{lambda})$$
– Mattos
Nov 15 at 6:10
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Consider the differential equation
$$X''(x)+lambda X=0$$
on $0 leq x leq 1$with boundary conditions
$$X'(0)+X(0)=0 text{and} X(1)=0.$$
I have a few problems here that I think I figured out, but I would appreciate another look or some hints as to what I can fix. Or, maybe I am totally wrong!
$textbf{My first goal:}$
Find an eigenfunction associated with eigenvalue $lambda=0.$
An eigenvalue $lambda =0$ would mean that $X''(x)=0$. This means that the solution takes the form
$$X(x)=Ax+B.$$
Since $X'(0)=A$ and $X(0)=B$,
$$X'(0)+X(0)=0 iff A=-B.$$
Therefore an eigenfunction that works would be $boxed{X_{0}(x)=-2x+2}.$
$textbf{My second goal:}$
Find an expression for all eigenvalues $lambda = beta ^2>0.$
This one requires a little more work. The solution to $X'(x)+beta ^2 X=0$ takes the form
$$X(x)=Acosbeta x +Bsin beta x.$$
Taking derivatives, one easily finds that $X'(0)=Bbeta$ and $X(0)=A.$ Thus we obtain
$$Bbeta + A=0 implies beta= frac{-A}{B}.$$
Finally, this gives $boxed{beta=frac{A^2}{B^2}}$
What are your thoughts? Thanks in advance!
Edit: I just realized that my last problem did not necessarily satisfy $X(1)=0.$
differential-equations pde eigenfunctions
Consider the differential equation
$$X''(x)+lambda X=0$$
on $0 leq x leq 1$with boundary conditions
$$X'(0)+X(0)=0 text{and} X(1)=0.$$
I have a few problems here that I think I figured out, but I would appreciate another look or some hints as to what I can fix. Or, maybe I am totally wrong!
$textbf{My first goal:}$
Find an eigenfunction associated with eigenvalue $lambda=0.$
An eigenvalue $lambda =0$ would mean that $X''(x)=0$. This means that the solution takes the form
$$X(x)=Ax+B.$$
Since $X'(0)=A$ and $X(0)=B$,
$$X'(0)+X(0)=0 iff A=-B.$$
Therefore an eigenfunction that works would be $boxed{X_{0}(x)=-2x+2}.$
$textbf{My second goal:}$
Find an expression for all eigenvalues $lambda = beta ^2>0.$
This one requires a little more work. The solution to $X'(x)+beta ^2 X=0$ takes the form
$$X(x)=Acosbeta x +Bsin beta x.$$
Taking derivatives, one easily finds that $X'(0)=Bbeta$ and $X(0)=A.$ Thus we obtain
$$Bbeta + A=0 implies beta= frac{-A}{B}.$$
Finally, this gives $boxed{beta=frac{A^2}{B^2}}$
What are your thoughts? Thanks in advance!
Edit: I just realized that my last problem did not necessarily satisfy $X(1)=0.$
differential-equations pde eigenfunctions
differential-equations pde eigenfunctions
edited Nov 15 at 5:51
asked Nov 15 at 5:40
StatGuy
530110
530110
1
First goal, a better eigenfunction would be $$X(x) = Ax - A, quad forall A in mathbb{R}$$ Always try to keep it as general as possible. Second goal, applying both boundary conditions yields begin{align} beta &= -frac{A}{B} \ &= tan beta end{align} and using the oddness of $tan( cdot)$, we get $$lambda = tan^{2}(sqrt{lambda})$$
– Mattos
Nov 15 at 6:10
add a comment |
1
First goal, a better eigenfunction would be $$X(x) = Ax - A, quad forall A in mathbb{R}$$ Always try to keep it as general as possible. Second goal, applying both boundary conditions yields begin{align} beta &= -frac{A}{B} \ &= tan beta end{align} and using the oddness of $tan( cdot)$, we get $$lambda = tan^{2}(sqrt{lambda})$$
– Mattos
Nov 15 at 6:10
1
1
First goal, a better eigenfunction would be $$X(x) = Ax - A, quad forall A in mathbb{R}$$ Always try to keep it as general as possible. Second goal, applying both boundary conditions yields begin{align} beta &= -frac{A}{B} \ &= tan beta end{align} and using the oddness of $tan( cdot)$, we get $$lambda = tan^{2}(sqrt{lambda})$$
– Mattos
Nov 15 at 6:10
First goal, a better eigenfunction would be $$X(x) = Ax - A, quad forall A in mathbb{R}$$ Always try to keep it as general as possible. Second goal, applying both boundary conditions yields begin{align} beta &= -frac{A}{B} \ &= tan beta end{align} and using the oddness of $tan( cdot)$, we get $$lambda = tan^{2}(sqrt{lambda})$$
– Mattos
Nov 15 at 6:10
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Since you want $X(1)=0$, you cat set $X'(1)$ to any non-zero constant ($0$ leads to $Xequiv 0$.) So I'd pick a value of $1$. Then
$$
X_{lambda}(x) = frac{sin(sqrt{lambda}(x-1))}{sqrt{lambda}}
$$
Choosing a constant value for $X'(1)$ forces the limiting case as $lambdarightarrow 0$ to be the correct solution for $lambda=0$ as well, which is
$$
X_{0} = x-1.
$$
You can check that this is an eigenfunction. So $lambda=0$ is an eigenvalue, with corresponding eigenfucntion $x-1$.
The general eigenvalue equation becomes
$$
X_{lambda}(0)+X_{lambda}'(0)=0 \
-frac{sin(sqrt{lambda})}{sqrt{lambda}}+cos(sqrt{lambda})=0
$$
The limit at $lambdarightarrow 0$ is $0$. So $lambda_0=0$ is an eigenvalue with $X_{0}=x-1$. For $lambdane 0$, the solutions are zeros of
$$
tan(sqrt{lambda})=sqrt{lambda}.
$$
This is a transcendental equation. You can plot the graphs of $y=tan(x)$ and $y=x$, and check the intersections of the graphs for $x ge 0$. The negative values of $sqrt{lambda}$ can be ignored because they lead to duplicate values of $lambda$.
The non-negative solutions are ordered as follows:
$$
sqrt{lambda_0} = 0 < sqrt{lambda_1} < frac{pi}{2} < sqrt{lambda_2} < frac{3pi}{2} < sqrt{lambda_3} < frac{5pi}{2} < cdots
$$
Asymptotically, $sqrt{lambda_n} approx frac{(2n-1)pi}{2}$ or $lambda_n approx frac{(2n-1)^2pi^2}{4}$ as $nrightarrowinfty$.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Since you want $X(1)=0$, you cat set $X'(1)$ to any non-zero constant ($0$ leads to $Xequiv 0$.) So I'd pick a value of $1$. Then
$$
X_{lambda}(x) = frac{sin(sqrt{lambda}(x-1))}{sqrt{lambda}}
$$
Choosing a constant value for $X'(1)$ forces the limiting case as $lambdarightarrow 0$ to be the correct solution for $lambda=0$ as well, which is
$$
X_{0} = x-1.
$$
You can check that this is an eigenfunction. So $lambda=0$ is an eigenvalue, with corresponding eigenfucntion $x-1$.
The general eigenvalue equation becomes
$$
X_{lambda}(0)+X_{lambda}'(0)=0 \
-frac{sin(sqrt{lambda})}{sqrt{lambda}}+cos(sqrt{lambda})=0
$$
The limit at $lambdarightarrow 0$ is $0$. So $lambda_0=0$ is an eigenvalue with $X_{0}=x-1$. For $lambdane 0$, the solutions are zeros of
$$
tan(sqrt{lambda})=sqrt{lambda}.
$$
This is a transcendental equation. You can plot the graphs of $y=tan(x)$ and $y=x$, and check the intersections of the graphs for $x ge 0$. The negative values of $sqrt{lambda}$ can be ignored because they lead to duplicate values of $lambda$.
The non-negative solutions are ordered as follows:
$$
sqrt{lambda_0} = 0 < sqrt{lambda_1} < frac{pi}{2} < sqrt{lambda_2} < frac{3pi}{2} < sqrt{lambda_3} < frac{5pi}{2} < cdots
$$
Asymptotically, $sqrt{lambda_n} approx frac{(2n-1)pi}{2}$ or $lambda_n approx frac{(2n-1)^2pi^2}{4}$ as $nrightarrowinfty$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Since you want $X(1)=0$, you cat set $X'(1)$ to any non-zero constant ($0$ leads to $Xequiv 0$.) So I'd pick a value of $1$. Then
$$
X_{lambda}(x) = frac{sin(sqrt{lambda}(x-1))}{sqrt{lambda}}
$$
Choosing a constant value for $X'(1)$ forces the limiting case as $lambdarightarrow 0$ to be the correct solution for $lambda=0$ as well, which is
$$
X_{0} = x-1.
$$
You can check that this is an eigenfunction. So $lambda=0$ is an eigenvalue, with corresponding eigenfucntion $x-1$.
The general eigenvalue equation becomes
$$
X_{lambda}(0)+X_{lambda}'(0)=0 \
-frac{sin(sqrt{lambda})}{sqrt{lambda}}+cos(sqrt{lambda})=0
$$
The limit at $lambdarightarrow 0$ is $0$. So $lambda_0=0$ is an eigenvalue with $X_{0}=x-1$. For $lambdane 0$, the solutions are zeros of
$$
tan(sqrt{lambda})=sqrt{lambda}.
$$
This is a transcendental equation. You can plot the graphs of $y=tan(x)$ and $y=x$, and check the intersections of the graphs for $x ge 0$. The negative values of $sqrt{lambda}$ can be ignored because they lead to duplicate values of $lambda$.
The non-negative solutions are ordered as follows:
$$
sqrt{lambda_0} = 0 < sqrt{lambda_1} < frac{pi}{2} < sqrt{lambda_2} < frac{3pi}{2} < sqrt{lambda_3} < frac{5pi}{2} < cdots
$$
Asymptotically, $sqrt{lambda_n} approx frac{(2n-1)pi}{2}$ or $lambda_n approx frac{(2n-1)^2pi^2}{4}$ as $nrightarrowinfty$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Since you want $X(1)=0$, you cat set $X'(1)$ to any non-zero constant ($0$ leads to $Xequiv 0$.) So I'd pick a value of $1$. Then
$$
X_{lambda}(x) = frac{sin(sqrt{lambda}(x-1))}{sqrt{lambda}}
$$
Choosing a constant value for $X'(1)$ forces the limiting case as $lambdarightarrow 0$ to be the correct solution for $lambda=0$ as well, which is
$$
X_{0} = x-1.
$$
You can check that this is an eigenfunction. So $lambda=0$ is an eigenvalue, with corresponding eigenfucntion $x-1$.
The general eigenvalue equation becomes
$$
X_{lambda}(0)+X_{lambda}'(0)=0 \
-frac{sin(sqrt{lambda})}{sqrt{lambda}}+cos(sqrt{lambda})=0
$$
The limit at $lambdarightarrow 0$ is $0$. So $lambda_0=0$ is an eigenvalue with $X_{0}=x-1$. For $lambdane 0$, the solutions are zeros of
$$
tan(sqrt{lambda})=sqrt{lambda}.
$$
This is a transcendental equation. You can plot the graphs of $y=tan(x)$ and $y=x$, and check the intersections of the graphs for $x ge 0$. The negative values of $sqrt{lambda}$ can be ignored because they lead to duplicate values of $lambda$.
The non-negative solutions are ordered as follows:
$$
sqrt{lambda_0} = 0 < sqrt{lambda_1} < frac{pi}{2} < sqrt{lambda_2} < frac{3pi}{2} < sqrt{lambda_3} < frac{5pi}{2} < cdots
$$
Asymptotically, $sqrt{lambda_n} approx frac{(2n-1)pi}{2}$ or $lambda_n approx frac{(2n-1)^2pi^2}{4}$ as $nrightarrowinfty$.
Since you want $X(1)=0$, you cat set $X'(1)$ to any non-zero constant ($0$ leads to $Xequiv 0$.) So I'd pick a value of $1$. Then
$$
X_{lambda}(x) = frac{sin(sqrt{lambda}(x-1))}{sqrt{lambda}}
$$
Choosing a constant value for $X'(1)$ forces the limiting case as $lambdarightarrow 0$ to be the correct solution for $lambda=0$ as well, which is
$$
X_{0} = x-1.
$$
You can check that this is an eigenfunction. So $lambda=0$ is an eigenvalue, with corresponding eigenfucntion $x-1$.
The general eigenvalue equation becomes
$$
X_{lambda}(0)+X_{lambda}'(0)=0 \
-frac{sin(sqrt{lambda})}{sqrt{lambda}}+cos(sqrt{lambda})=0
$$
The limit at $lambdarightarrow 0$ is $0$. So $lambda_0=0$ is an eigenvalue with $X_{0}=x-1$. For $lambdane 0$, the solutions are zeros of
$$
tan(sqrt{lambda})=sqrt{lambda}.
$$
This is a transcendental equation. You can plot the graphs of $y=tan(x)$ and $y=x$, and check the intersections of the graphs for $x ge 0$. The negative values of $sqrt{lambda}$ can be ignored because they lead to duplicate values of $lambda$.
The non-negative solutions are ordered as follows:
$$
sqrt{lambda_0} = 0 < sqrt{lambda_1} < frac{pi}{2} < sqrt{lambda_2} < frac{3pi}{2} < sqrt{lambda_3} < frac{5pi}{2} < cdots
$$
Asymptotically, $sqrt{lambda_n} approx frac{(2n-1)pi}{2}$ or $lambda_n approx frac{(2n-1)^2pi^2}{4}$ as $nrightarrowinfty$.
edited Nov 18 at 0:12
answered Nov 17 at 20:56
DisintegratingByParts
57.6k42376
57.6k42376
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999281%2ffinding-eigenfunctions-and-eigenvalues-from-a-differential-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
First goal, a better eigenfunction would be $$X(x) = Ax - A, quad forall A in mathbb{R}$$ Always try to keep it as general as possible. Second goal, applying both boundary conditions yields begin{align} beta &= -frac{A}{B} \ &= tan beta end{align} and using the oddness of $tan( cdot)$, we get $$lambda = tan^{2}(sqrt{lambda})$$
– Mattos
Nov 15 at 6:10