Finding eigenfunctions and eigenvalues from a differential equation











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Consider the differential equation
$$X''(x)+lambda X=0$$
on $0 leq x leq 1$with boundary conditions
$$X'(0)+X(0)=0 text{and} X(1)=0.$$
I have a few problems here that I think I figured out, but I would appreciate another look or some hints as to what I can fix. Or, maybe I am totally wrong!



$textbf{My first goal:}$




Find an eigenfunction associated with eigenvalue $lambda=0.$




An eigenvalue $lambda =0$ would mean that $X''(x)=0$. This means that the solution takes the form
$$X(x)=Ax+B.$$
Since $X'(0)=A$ and $X(0)=B$,
$$X'(0)+X(0)=0 iff A=-B.$$
Therefore an eigenfunction that works would be $boxed{X_{0}(x)=-2x+2}.$



$textbf{My second goal:}$




Find an expression for all eigenvalues $lambda = beta ^2>0.$




This one requires a little more work. The solution to $X'(x)+beta ^2 X=0$ takes the form
$$X(x)=Acosbeta x +Bsin beta x.$$
Taking derivatives, one easily finds that $X'(0)=Bbeta$ and $X(0)=A.$ Thus we obtain
$$Bbeta + A=0 implies beta= frac{-A}{B}.$$
Finally, this gives $boxed{beta=frac{A^2}{B^2}}$



What are your thoughts? Thanks in advance!



Edit: I just realized that my last problem did not necessarily satisfy $X(1)=0.$










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    First goal, a better eigenfunction would be $$X(x) = Ax - A, quad forall A in mathbb{R}$$ Always try to keep it as general as possible. Second goal, applying both boundary conditions yields begin{align} beta &= -frac{A}{B} \ &= tan beta end{align} and using the oddness of $tan( cdot)$, we get $$lambda = tan^{2}(sqrt{lambda})$$
    – Mattos
    Nov 15 at 6:10

















up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Consider the differential equation
$$X''(x)+lambda X=0$$
on $0 leq x leq 1$with boundary conditions
$$X'(0)+X(0)=0 text{and} X(1)=0.$$
I have a few problems here that I think I figured out, but I would appreciate another look or some hints as to what I can fix. Or, maybe I am totally wrong!



$textbf{My first goal:}$




Find an eigenfunction associated with eigenvalue $lambda=0.$




An eigenvalue $lambda =0$ would mean that $X''(x)=0$. This means that the solution takes the form
$$X(x)=Ax+B.$$
Since $X'(0)=A$ and $X(0)=B$,
$$X'(0)+X(0)=0 iff A=-B.$$
Therefore an eigenfunction that works would be $boxed{X_{0}(x)=-2x+2}.$



$textbf{My second goal:}$




Find an expression for all eigenvalues $lambda = beta ^2>0.$




This one requires a little more work. The solution to $X'(x)+beta ^2 X=0$ takes the form
$$X(x)=Acosbeta x +Bsin beta x.$$
Taking derivatives, one easily finds that $X'(0)=Bbeta$ and $X(0)=A.$ Thus we obtain
$$Bbeta + A=0 implies beta= frac{-A}{B}.$$
Finally, this gives $boxed{beta=frac{A^2}{B^2}}$



What are your thoughts? Thanks in advance!



Edit: I just realized that my last problem did not necessarily satisfy $X(1)=0.$










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    First goal, a better eigenfunction would be $$X(x) = Ax - A, quad forall A in mathbb{R}$$ Always try to keep it as general as possible. Second goal, applying both boundary conditions yields begin{align} beta &= -frac{A}{B} \ &= tan beta end{align} and using the oddness of $tan( cdot)$, we get $$lambda = tan^{2}(sqrt{lambda})$$
    – Mattos
    Nov 15 at 6:10















up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





Consider the differential equation
$$X''(x)+lambda X=0$$
on $0 leq x leq 1$with boundary conditions
$$X'(0)+X(0)=0 text{and} X(1)=0.$$
I have a few problems here that I think I figured out, but I would appreciate another look or some hints as to what I can fix. Or, maybe I am totally wrong!



$textbf{My first goal:}$




Find an eigenfunction associated with eigenvalue $lambda=0.$




An eigenvalue $lambda =0$ would mean that $X''(x)=0$. This means that the solution takes the form
$$X(x)=Ax+B.$$
Since $X'(0)=A$ and $X(0)=B$,
$$X'(0)+X(0)=0 iff A=-B.$$
Therefore an eigenfunction that works would be $boxed{X_{0}(x)=-2x+2}.$



$textbf{My second goal:}$




Find an expression for all eigenvalues $lambda = beta ^2>0.$




This one requires a little more work. The solution to $X'(x)+beta ^2 X=0$ takes the form
$$X(x)=Acosbeta x +Bsin beta x.$$
Taking derivatives, one easily finds that $X'(0)=Bbeta$ and $X(0)=A.$ Thus we obtain
$$Bbeta + A=0 implies beta= frac{-A}{B}.$$
Finally, this gives $boxed{beta=frac{A^2}{B^2}}$



What are your thoughts? Thanks in advance!



Edit: I just realized that my last problem did not necessarily satisfy $X(1)=0.$










share|cite|improve this question















Consider the differential equation
$$X''(x)+lambda X=0$$
on $0 leq x leq 1$with boundary conditions
$$X'(0)+X(0)=0 text{and} X(1)=0.$$
I have a few problems here that I think I figured out, but I would appreciate another look or some hints as to what I can fix. Or, maybe I am totally wrong!



$textbf{My first goal:}$




Find an eigenfunction associated with eigenvalue $lambda=0.$




An eigenvalue $lambda =0$ would mean that $X''(x)=0$. This means that the solution takes the form
$$X(x)=Ax+B.$$
Since $X'(0)=A$ and $X(0)=B$,
$$X'(0)+X(0)=0 iff A=-B.$$
Therefore an eigenfunction that works would be $boxed{X_{0}(x)=-2x+2}.$



$textbf{My second goal:}$




Find an expression for all eigenvalues $lambda = beta ^2>0.$




This one requires a little more work. The solution to $X'(x)+beta ^2 X=0$ takes the form
$$X(x)=Acosbeta x +Bsin beta x.$$
Taking derivatives, one easily finds that $X'(0)=Bbeta$ and $X(0)=A.$ Thus we obtain
$$Bbeta + A=0 implies beta= frac{-A}{B}.$$
Finally, this gives $boxed{beta=frac{A^2}{B^2}}$



What are your thoughts? Thanks in advance!



Edit: I just realized that my last problem did not necessarily satisfy $X(1)=0.$







differential-equations pde eigenfunctions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 15 at 5:51

























asked Nov 15 at 5:40









StatGuy

530110




530110








  • 1




    First goal, a better eigenfunction would be $$X(x) = Ax - A, quad forall A in mathbb{R}$$ Always try to keep it as general as possible. Second goal, applying both boundary conditions yields begin{align} beta &= -frac{A}{B} \ &= tan beta end{align} and using the oddness of $tan( cdot)$, we get $$lambda = tan^{2}(sqrt{lambda})$$
    – Mattos
    Nov 15 at 6:10
















  • 1




    First goal, a better eigenfunction would be $$X(x) = Ax - A, quad forall A in mathbb{R}$$ Always try to keep it as general as possible. Second goal, applying both boundary conditions yields begin{align} beta &= -frac{A}{B} \ &= tan beta end{align} and using the oddness of $tan( cdot)$, we get $$lambda = tan^{2}(sqrt{lambda})$$
    – Mattos
    Nov 15 at 6:10










1




1




First goal, a better eigenfunction would be $$X(x) = Ax - A, quad forall A in mathbb{R}$$ Always try to keep it as general as possible. Second goal, applying both boundary conditions yields begin{align} beta &= -frac{A}{B} \ &= tan beta end{align} and using the oddness of $tan( cdot)$, we get $$lambda = tan^{2}(sqrt{lambda})$$
– Mattos
Nov 15 at 6:10






First goal, a better eigenfunction would be $$X(x) = Ax - A, quad forall A in mathbb{R}$$ Always try to keep it as general as possible. Second goal, applying both boundary conditions yields begin{align} beta &= -frac{A}{B} \ &= tan beta end{align} and using the oddness of $tan( cdot)$, we get $$lambda = tan^{2}(sqrt{lambda})$$
– Mattos
Nov 15 at 6:10












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










Since you want $X(1)=0$, you cat set $X'(1)$ to any non-zero constant ($0$ leads to $Xequiv 0$.) So I'd pick a value of $1$. Then
$$
X_{lambda}(x) = frac{sin(sqrt{lambda}(x-1))}{sqrt{lambda}}
$$

Choosing a constant value for $X'(1)$ forces the limiting case as $lambdarightarrow 0$ to be the correct solution for $lambda=0$ as well, which is
$$
X_{0} = x-1.
$$

You can check that this is an eigenfunction. So $lambda=0$ is an eigenvalue, with corresponding eigenfucntion $x-1$.



The general eigenvalue equation becomes
$$
X_{lambda}(0)+X_{lambda}'(0)=0 \
-frac{sin(sqrt{lambda})}{sqrt{lambda}}+cos(sqrt{lambda})=0
$$

The limit at $lambdarightarrow 0$ is $0$. So $lambda_0=0$ is an eigenvalue with $X_{0}=x-1$. For $lambdane 0$, the solutions are zeros of
$$
tan(sqrt{lambda})=sqrt{lambda}.
$$

This is a transcendental equation. You can plot the graphs of $y=tan(x)$ and $y=x$, and check the intersections of the graphs for $x ge 0$. The negative values of $sqrt{lambda}$ can be ignored because they lead to duplicate values of $lambda$.
The non-negative solutions are ordered as follows:
$$
sqrt{lambda_0} = 0 < sqrt{lambda_1} < frac{pi}{2} < sqrt{lambda_2} < frac{3pi}{2} < sqrt{lambda_3} < frac{5pi}{2} < cdots
$$

Asymptotically, $sqrt{lambda_n} approx frac{(2n-1)pi}{2}$ or $lambda_n approx frac{(2n-1)^2pi^2}{4}$ as $nrightarrowinfty$.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999281%2ffinding-eigenfunctions-and-eigenvalues-from-a-differential-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote



    accepted










    Since you want $X(1)=0$, you cat set $X'(1)$ to any non-zero constant ($0$ leads to $Xequiv 0$.) So I'd pick a value of $1$. Then
    $$
    X_{lambda}(x) = frac{sin(sqrt{lambda}(x-1))}{sqrt{lambda}}
    $$

    Choosing a constant value for $X'(1)$ forces the limiting case as $lambdarightarrow 0$ to be the correct solution for $lambda=0$ as well, which is
    $$
    X_{0} = x-1.
    $$

    You can check that this is an eigenfunction. So $lambda=0$ is an eigenvalue, with corresponding eigenfucntion $x-1$.



    The general eigenvalue equation becomes
    $$
    X_{lambda}(0)+X_{lambda}'(0)=0 \
    -frac{sin(sqrt{lambda})}{sqrt{lambda}}+cos(sqrt{lambda})=0
    $$

    The limit at $lambdarightarrow 0$ is $0$. So $lambda_0=0$ is an eigenvalue with $X_{0}=x-1$. For $lambdane 0$, the solutions are zeros of
    $$
    tan(sqrt{lambda})=sqrt{lambda}.
    $$

    This is a transcendental equation. You can plot the graphs of $y=tan(x)$ and $y=x$, and check the intersections of the graphs for $x ge 0$. The negative values of $sqrt{lambda}$ can be ignored because they lead to duplicate values of $lambda$.
    The non-negative solutions are ordered as follows:
    $$
    sqrt{lambda_0} = 0 < sqrt{lambda_1} < frac{pi}{2} < sqrt{lambda_2} < frac{3pi}{2} < sqrt{lambda_3} < frac{5pi}{2} < cdots
    $$

    Asymptotically, $sqrt{lambda_n} approx frac{(2n-1)pi}{2}$ or $lambda_n approx frac{(2n-1)^2pi^2}{4}$ as $nrightarrowinfty$.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      0
      down vote



      accepted










      Since you want $X(1)=0$, you cat set $X'(1)$ to any non-zero constant ($0$ leads to $Xequiv 0$.) So I'd pick a value of $1$. Then
      $$
      X_{lambda}(x) = frac{sin(sqrt{lambda}(x-1))}{sqrt{lambda}}
      $$

      Choosing a constant value for $X'(1)$ forces the limiting case as $lambdarightarrow 0$ to be the correct solution for $lambda=0$ as well, which is
      $$
      X_{0} = x-1.
      $$

      You can check that this is an eigenfunction. So $lambda=0$ is an eigenvalue, with corresponding eigenfucntion $x-1$.



      The general eigenvalue equation becomes
      $$
      X_{lambda}(0)+X_{lambda}'(0)=0 \
      -frac{sin(sqrt{lambda})}{sqrt{lambda}}+cos(sqrt{lambda})=0
      $$

      The limit at $lambdarightarrow 0$ is $0$. So $lambda_0=0$ is an eigenvalue with $X_{0}=x-1$. For $lambdane 0$, the solutions are zeros of
      $$
      tan(sqrt{lambda})=sqrt{lambda}.
      $$

      This is a transcendental equation. You can plot the graphs of $y=tan(x)$ and $y=x$, and check the intersections of the graphs for $x ge 0$. The negative values of $sqrt{lambda}$ can be ignored because they lead to duplicate values of $lambda$.
      The non-negative solutions are ordered as follows:
      $$
      sqrt{lambda_0} = 0 < sqrt{lambda_1} < frac{pi}{2} < sqrt{lambda_2} < frac{3pi}{2} < sqrt{lambda_3} < frac{5pi}{2} < cdots
      $$

      Asymptotically, $sqrt{lambda_n} approx frac{(2n-1)pi}{2}$ or $lambda_n approx frac{(2n-1)^2pi^2}{4}$ as $nrightarrowinfty$.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted






        Since you want $X(1)=0$, you cat set $X'(1)$ to any non-zero constant ($0$ leads to $Xequiv 0$.) So I'd pick a value of $1$. Then
        $$
        X_{lambda}(x) = frac{sin(sqrt{lambda}(x-1))}{sqrt{lambda}}
        $$

        Choosing a constant value for $X'(1)$ forces the limiting case as $lambdarightarrow 0$ to be the correct solution for $lambda=0$ as well, which is
        $$
        X_{0} = x-1.
        $$

        You can check that this is an eigenfunction. So $lambda=0$ is an eigenvalue, with corresponding eigenfucntion $x-1$.



        The general eigenvalue equation becomes
        $$
        X_{lambda}(0)+X_{lambda}'(0)=0 \
        -frac{sin(sqrt{lambda})}{sqrt{lambda}}+cos(sqrt{lambda})=0
        $$

        The limit at $lambdarightarrow 0$ is $0$. So $lambda_0=0$ is an eigenvalue with $X_{0}=x-1$. For $lambdane 0$, the solutions are zeros of
        $$
        tan(sqrt{lambda})=sqrt{lambda}.
        $$

        This is a transcendental equation. You can plot the graphs of $y=tan(x)$ and $y=x$, and check the intersections of the graphs for $x ge 0$. The negative values of $sqrt{lambda}$ can be ignored because they lead to duplicate values of $lambda$.
        The non-negative solutions are ordered as follows:
        $$
        sqrt{lambda_0} = 0 < sqrt{lambda_1} < frac{pi}{2} < sqrt{lambda_2} < frac{3pi}{2} < sqrt{lambda_3} < frac{5pi}{2} < cdots
        $$

        Asymptotically, $sqrt{lambda_n} approx frac{(2n-1)pi}{2}$ or $lambda_n approx frac{(2n-1)^2pi^2}{4}$ as $nrightarrowinfty$.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        Since you want $X(1)=0$, you cat set $X'(1)$ to any non-zero constant ($0$ leads to $Xequiv 0$.) So I'd pick a value of $1$. Then
        $$
        X_{lambda}(x) = frac{sin(sqrt{lambda}(x-1))}{sqrt{lambda}}
        $$

        Choosing a constant value for $X'(1)$ forces the limiting case as $lambdarightarrow 0$ to be the correct solution for $lambda=0$ as well, which is
        $$
        X_{0} = x-1.
        $$

        You can check that this is an eigenfunction. So $lambda=0$ is an eigenvalue, with corresponding eigenfucntion $x-1$.



        The general eigenvalue equation becomes
        $$
        X_{lambda}(0)+X_{lambda}'(0)=0 \
        -frac{sin(sqrt{lambda})}{sqrt{lambda}}+cos(sqrt{lambda})=0
        $$

        The limit at $lambdarightarrow 0$ is $0$. So $lambda_0=0$ is an eigenvalue with $X_{0}=x-1$. For $lambdane 0$, the solutions are zeros of
        $$
        tan(sqrt{lambda})=sqrt{lambda}.
        $$

        This is a transcendental equation. You can plot the graphs of $y=tan(x)$ and $y=x$, and check the intersections of the graphs for $x ge 0$. The negative values of $sqrt{lambda}$ can be ignored because they lead to duplicate values of $lambda$.
        The non-negative solutions are ordered as follows:
        $$
        sqrt{lambda_0} = 0 < sqrt{lambda_1} < frac{pi}{2} < sqrt{lambda_2} < frac{3pi}{2} < sqrt{lambda_3} < frac{5pi}{2} < cdots
        $$

        Asymptotically, $sqrt{lambda_n} approx frac{(2n-1)pi}{2}$ or $lambda_n approx frac{(2n-1)^2pi^2}{4}$ as $nrightarrowinfty$.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 18 at 0:12

























        answered Nov 17 at 20:56









        DisintegratingByParts

        57.6k42376




        57.6k42376






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999281%2ffinding-eigenfunctions-and-eigenvalues-from-a-differential-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Verónica Boquete

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten