Minimum distance between polynomials in ring-LWE











up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












Let $R_q=mathbb{Z}_q[x]/langle f(x)rangle$ where $f(x)=x^n+1$, as in the ring-LWE problem.



Let $a(x)$ be chosen uniformly at random from $R_q$.



Question: Is there any theorem that lower bounds the distance between any two polynomials of the form $a(x)s_1(s)$ and $a(x)s_2(x)$?



In other words, what is the value of $d$ such that $$||a(x)s_1(x)-a(x)s_2(x)||geq d$$ except with negligible probability, for any two polynomials $s_1(x),s_2(x)in R_q$ and where $||cdot||$ is the usual $L_2$ norm?










share|improve this question






















  • Hello. It is a good question, but the $L_2$ norm is defined over vectors and it is not clear how you are embedding the polynomials in a vector space. Are you just representing the polynomials as vectors with their coefficients? (So, for instance, $2x^3 -1$ becomes the vector $(2, 0, 0, -1)$).
    – Hilder Vitor Lima Pereira
    9 hours ago










  • Yes, I am thinking of the canonical embedding
    – P.B.
    9 hours ago










  • I found some relative concept in your question and AG codes, I suspect the minimum distance for a Goppa code is a simple answer for your question. The minimum distance for Goppa codes is $d_{min}=n-k-gamma-1$. $gamma$ is the genus of the algebraic curve. We can easily find it for RS codes that the curve is a line and the genus is equal to zero so the minimum distance for them is $d_{min}=n-k-1$.
    – Mahdi Sedaghat
    9 hours ago










  • Well, the canonical embedding is the one that uses isomorphisms to embed the polynomials. The one I've described is the coefficient embedding...
    – Hilder Vitor Lima Pereira
    9 hours ago












  • Sorry. I mean the coefficient embedding then
    – P.B.
    8 hours ago















up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












Let $R_q=mathbb{Z}_q[x]/langle f(x)rangle$ where $f(x)=x^n+1$, as in the ring-LWE problem.



Let $a(x)$ be chosen uniformly at random from $R_q$.



Question: Is there any theorem that lower bounds the distance between any two polynomials of the form $a(x)s_1(s)$ and $a(x)s_2(x)$?



In other words, what is the value of $d$ such that $$||a(x)s_1(x)-a(x)s_2(x)||geq d$$ except with negligible probability, for any two polynomials $s_1(x),s_2(x)in R_q$ and where $||cdot||$ is the usual $L_2$ norm?










share|improve this question






















  • Hello. It is a good question, but the $L_2$ norm is defined over vectors and it is not clear how you are embedding the polynomials in a vector space. Are you just representing the polynomials as vectors with their coefficients? (So, for instance, $2x^3 -1$ becomes the vector $(2, 0, 0, -1)$).
    – Hilder Vitor Lima Pereira
    9 hours ago










  • Yes, I am thinking of the canonical embedding
    – P.B.
    9 hours ago










  • I found some relative concept in your question and AG codes, I suspect the minimum distance for a Goppa code is a simple answer for your question. The minimum distance for Goppa codes is $d_{min}=n-k-gamma-1$. $gamma$ is the genus of the algebraic curve. We can easily find it for RS codes that the curve is a line and the genus is equal to zero so the minimum distance for them is $d_{min}=n-k-1$.
    – Mahdi Sedaghat
    9 hours ago










  • Well, the canonical embedding is the one that uses isomorphisms to embed the polynomials. The one I've described is the coefficient embedding...
    – Hilder Vitor Lima Pereira
    9 hours ago












  • Sorry. I mean the coefficient embedding then
    – P.B.
    8 hours ago













up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1






1





Let $R_q=mathbb{Z}_q[x]/langle f(x)rangle$ where $f(x)=x^n+1$, as in the ring-LWE problem.



Let $a(x)$ be chosen uniformly at random from $R_q$.



Question: Is there any theorem that lower bounds the distance between any two polynomials of the form $a(x)s_1(s)$ and $a(x)s_2(x)$?



In other words, what is the value of $d$ such that $$||a(x)s_1(x)-a(x)s_2(x)||geq d$$ except with negligible probability, for any two polynomials $s_1(x),s_2(x)in R_q$ and where $||cdot||$ is the usual $L_2$ norm?










share|improve this question













Let $R_q=mathbb{Z}_q[x]/langle f(x)rangle$ where $f(x)=x^n+1$, as in the ring-LWE problem.



Let $a(x)$ be chosen uniformly at random from $R_q$.



Question: Is there any theorem that lower bounds the distance between any two polynomials of the form $a(x)s_1(s)$ and $a(x)s_2(x)$?



In other words, what is the value of $d$ such that $$||a(x)s_1(x)-a(x)s_2(x)||geq d$$ except with negligible probability, for any two polynomials $s_1(x),s_2(x)in R_q$ and where $||cdot||$ is the usual $L_2$ norm?







lattice-crypto lwe ring-lwe






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 10 hours ago









P.B.

1356




1356












  • Hello. It is a good question, but the $L_2$ norm is defined over vectors and it is not clear how you are embedding the polynomials in a vector space. Are you just representing the polynomials as vectors with their coefficients? (So, for instance, $2x^3 -1$ becomes the vector $(2, 0, 0, -1)$).
    – Hilder Vitor Lima Pereira
    9 hours ago










  • Yes, I am thinking of the canonical embedding
    – P.B.
    9 hours ago










  • I found some relative concept in your question and AG codes, I suspect the minimum distance for a Goppa code is a simple answer for your question. The minimum distance for Goppa codes is $d_{min}=n-k-gamma-1$. $gamma$ is the genus of the algebraic curve. We can easily find it for RS codes that the curve is a line and the genus is equal to zero so the minimum distance for them is $d_{min}=n-k-1$.
    – Mahdi Sedaghat
    9 hours ago










  • Well, the canonical embedding is the one that uses isomorphisms to embed the polynomials. The one I've described is the coefficient embedding...
    – Hilder Vitor Lima Pereira
    9 hours ago












  • Sorry. I mean the coefficient embedding then
    – P.B.
    8 hours ago


















  • Hello. It is a good question, but the $L_2$ norm is defined over vectors and it is not clear how you are embedding the polynomials in a vector space. Are you just representing the polynomials as vectors with their coefficients? (So, for instance, $2x^3 -1$ becomes the vector $(2, 0, 0, -1)$).
    – Hilder Vitor Lima Pereira
    9 hours ago










  • Yes, I am thinking of the canonical embedding
    – P.B.
    9 hours ago










  • I found some relative concept in your question and AG codes, I suspect the minimum distance for a Goppa code is a simple answer for your question. The minimum distance for Goppa codes is $d_{min}=n-k-gamma-1$. $gamma$ is the genus of the algebraic curve. We can easily find it for RS codes that the curve is a line and the genus is equal to zero so the minimum distance for them is $d_{min}=n-k-1$.
    – Mahdi Sedaghat
    9 hours ago










  • Well, the canonical embedding is the one that uses isomorphisms to embed the polynomials. The one I've described is the coefficient embedding...
    – Hilder Vitor Lima Pereira
    9 hours ago












  • Sorry. I mean the coefficient embedding then
    – P.B.
    8 hours ago
















Hello. It is a good question, but the $L_2$ norm is defined over vectors and it is not clear how you are embedding the polynomials in a vector space. Are you just representing the polynomials as vectors with their coefficients? (So, for instance, $2x^3 -1$ becomes the vector $(2, 0, 0, -1)$).
– Hilder Vitor Lima Pereira
9 hours ago




Hello. It is a good question, but the $L_2$ norm is defined over vectors and it is not clear how you are embedding the polynomials in a vector space. Are you just representing the polynomials as vectors with their coefficients? (So, for instance, $2x^3 -1$ becomes the vector $(2, 0, 0, -1)$).
– Hilder Vitor Lima Pereira
9 hours ago












Yes, I am thinking of the canonical embedding
– P.B.
9 hours ago




Yes, I am thinking of the canonical embedding
– P.B.
9 hours ago












I found some relative concept in your question and AG codes, I suspect the minimum distance for a Goppa code is a simple answer for your question. The minimum distance for Goppa codes is $d_{min}=n-k-gamma-1$. $gamma$ is the genus of the algebraic curve. We can easily find it for RS codes that the curve is a line and the genus is equal to zero so the minimum distance for them is $d_{min}=n-k-1$.
– Mahdi Sedaghat
9 hours ago




I found some relative concept in your question and AG codes, I suspect the minimum distance for a Goppa code is a simple answer for your question. The minimum distance for Goppa codes is $d_{min}=n-k-gamma-1$. $gamma$ is the genus of the algebraic curve. We can easily find it for RS codes that the curve is a line and the genus is equal to zero so the minimum distance for them is $d_{min}=n-k-1$.
– Mahdi Sedaghat
9 hours ago












Well, the canonical embedding is the one that uses isomorphisms to embed the polynomials. The one I've described is the coefficient embedding...
– Hilder Vitor Lima Pereira
9 hours ago






Well, the canonical embedding is the one that uses isomorphisms to embed the polynomials. The one I've described is the coefficient embedding...
– Hilder Vitor Lima Pereira
9 hours ago














Sorry. I mean the coefficient embedding then
– P.B.
8 hours ago




Sorry. I mean the coefficient embedding then
– P.B.
8 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













I'm assuming $n$ is a power of $2$ and that $q$ is an odd prime larger than $n$. I'm discarding the trivial case $s_1 = s_2$.



If you consider everything $mod q$, then it is most likely over the choice of $a$ that there exists $s_1 neq s_2$ such that $|a s_1 - a s_2| = sqrt{n}$. Indeed, $a$ is invertible in $R_q$ with probability about $1 - n/q$. Take $s_2 = s_1 - a^{-1}$, then you have $a s_1 - a s_2 = 1 mod q$ and the embedding norm of $1$ is $sqrt{n}$.



If you do not consider this $mod q$, i.e. you work in $R=mathbb Z[x]/⟨f(x)⟩$, then you are precisely asking for the minimal distance $lambda_1(mathfrak I)$ of the ideal lattice $mathfrak I$ generated by $a$. For such an ideal lattice, we can estimate rather precisely this minimal distance. A simple lower bound is
$lambda_1(mathfrak I) geq Delta_K^{1/2n} cdot N(a)^{1/n}$, where $N$ denotes the algebraic norm of $a$ (that is, the product of all its embeddings), and $Delta_K$ is the discriminant of field $K = mathbb Q(x)/(x^n+1)$. The reason is that the minimal vector $x$ must generate a subideal of $mathfrak I$, so $N(x) geq N(a)$, and $|x|^n geq Delta_K^{1/2} N(x)$. An upper bound is also given by Minkowski's theorem.






share|improve this answer























  • Shouldn't the embedding norm of 1 be 1?
    – P.B.
    2 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "281"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcrypto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f64299%2fminimum-distance-between-polynomials-in-ring-lwe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote













I'm assuming $n$ is a power of $2$ and that $q$ is an odd prime larger than $n$. I'm discarding the trivial case $s_1 = s_2$.



If you consider everything $mod q$, then it is most likely over the choice of $a$ that there exists $s_1 neq s_2$ such that $|a s_1 - a s_2| = sqrt{n}$. Indeed, $a$ is invertible in $R_q$ with probability about $1 - n/q$. Take $s_2 = s_1 - a^{-1}$, then you have $a s_1 - a s_2 = 1 mod q$ and the embedding norm of $1$ is $sqrt{n}$.



If you do not consider this $mod q$, i.e. you work in $R=mathbb Z[x]/⟨f(x)⟩$, then you are precisely asking for the minimal distance $lambda_1(mathfrak I)$ of the ideal lattice $mathfrak I$ generated by $a$. For such an ideal lattice, we can estimate rather precisely this minimal distance. A simple lower bound is
$lambda_1(mathfrak I) geq Delta_K^{1/2n} cdot N(a)^{1/n}$, where $N$ denotes the algebraic norm of $a$ (that is, the product of all its embeddings), and $Delta_K$ is the discriminant of field $K = mathbb Q(x)/(x^n+1)$. The reason is that the minimal vector $x$ must generate a subideal of $mathfrak I$, so $N(x) geq N(a)$, and $|x|^n geq Delta_K^{1/2} N(x)$. An upper bound is also given by Minkowski's theorem.






share|improve this answer























  • Shouldn't the embedding norm of 1 be 1?
    – P.B.
    2 hours ago















up vote
2
down vote













I'm assuming $n$ is a power of $2$ and that $q$ is an odd prime larger than $n$. I'm discarding the trivial case $s_1 = s_2$.



If you consider everything $mod q$, then it is most likely over the choice of $a$ that there exists $s_1 neq s_2$ such that $|a s_1 - a s_2| = sqrt{n}$. Indeed, $a$ is invertible in $R_q$ with probability about $1 - n/q$. Take $s_2 = s_1 - a^{-1}$, then you have $a s_1 - a s_2 = 1 mod q$ and the embedding norm of $1$ is $sqrt{n}$.



If you do not consider this $mod q$, i.e. you work in $R=mathbb Z[x]/⟨f(x)⟩$, then you are precisely asking for the minimal distance $lambda_1(mathfrak I)$ of the ideal lattice $mathfrak I$ generated by $a$. For such an ideal lattice, we can estimate rather precisely this minimal distance. A simple lower bound is
$lambda_1(mathfrak I) geq Delta_K^{1/2n} cdot N(a)^{1/n}$, where $N$ denotes the algebraic norm of $a$ (that is, the product of all its embeddings), and $Delta_K$ is the discriminant of field $K = mathbb Q(x)/(x^n+1)$. The reason is that the minimal vector $x$ must generate a subideal of $mathfrak I$, so $N(x) geq N(a)$, and $|x|^n geq Delta_K^{1/2} N(x)$. An upper bound is also given by Minkowski's theorem.






share|improve this answer























  • Shouldn't the embedding norm of 1 be 1?
    – P.B.
    2 hours ago













up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









I'm assuming $n$ is a power of $2$ and that $q$ is an odd prime larger than $n$. I'm discarding the trivial case $s_1 = s_2$.



If you consider everything $mod q$, then it is most likely over the choice of $a$ that there exists $s_1 neq s_2$ such that $|a s_1 - a s_2| = sqrt{n}$. Indeed, $a$ is invertible in $R_q$ with probability about $1 - n/q$. Take $s_2 = s_1 - a^{-1}$, then you have $a s_1 - a s_2 = 1 mod q$ and the embedding norm of $1$ is $sqrt{n}$.



If you do not consider this $mod q$, i.e. you work in $R=mathbb Z[x]/⟨f(x)⟩$, then you are precisely asking for the minimal distance $lambda_1(mathfrak I)$ of the ideal lattice $mathfrak I$ generated by $a$. For such an ideal lattice, we can estimate rather precisely this minimal distance. A simple lower bound is
$lambda_1(mathfrak I) geq Delta_K^{1/2n} cdot N(a)^{1/n}$, where $N$ denotes the algebraic norm of $a$ (that is, the product of all its embeddings), and $Delta_K$ is the discriminant of field $K = mathbb Q(x)/(x^n+1)$. The reason is that the minimal vector $x$ must generate a subideal of $mathfrak I$, so $N(x) geq N(a)$, and $|x|^n geq Delta_K^{1/2} N(x)$. An upper bound is also given by Minkowski's theorem.






share|improve this answer














I'm assuming $n$ is a power of $2$ and that $q$ is an odd prime larger than $n$. I'm discarding the trivial case $s_1 = s_2$.



If you consider everything $mod q$, then it is most likely over the choice of $a$ that there exists $s_1 neq s_2$ such that $|a s_1 - a s_2| = sqrt{n}$. Indeed, $a$ is invertible in $R_q$ with probability about $1 - n/q$. Take $s_2 = s_1 - a^{-1}$, then you have $a s_1 - a s_2 = 1 mod q$ and the embedding norm of $1$ is $sqrt{n}$.



If you do not consider this $mod q$, i.e. you work in $R=mathbb Z[x]/⟨f(x)⟩$, then you are precisely asking for the minimal distance $lambda_1(mathfrak I)$ of the ideal lattice $mathfrak I$ generated by $a$. For such an ideal lattice, we can estimate rather precisely this minimal distance. A simple lower bound is
$lambda_1(mathfrak I) geq Delta_K^{1/2n} cdot N(a)^{1/n}$, where $N$ denotes the algebraic norm of $a$ (that is, the product of all its embeddings), and $Delta_K$ is the discriminant of field $K = mathbb Q(x)/(x^n+1)$. The reason is that the minimal vector $x$ must generate a subideal of $mathfrak I$, so $N(x) geq N(a)$, and $|x|^n geq Delta_K^{1/2} N(x)$. An upper bound is also given by Minkowski's theorem.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 4 hours ago









Ella Rose

14.3k43775




14.3k43775










answered 5 hours ago









LeoDucas

31515




31515












  • Shouldn't the embedding norm of 1 be 1?
    – P.B.
    2 hours ago


















  • Shouldn't the embedding norm of 1 be 1?
    – P.B.
    2 hours ago
















Shouldn't the embedding norm of 1 be 1?
– P.B.
2 hours ago




Shouldn't the embedding norm of 1 be 1?
– P.B.
2 hours ago


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcrypto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f64299%2fminimum-distance-between-polynomials-in-ring-lwe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bundesstraße 106

Verónica Boquete

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten