upper and lower sum answer not matching











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have to show that f is integrable using the Riemann criterion where
f(x) = x on [0, 1]. I am a bit confused over how my solution differs from the hint to solution of that question I have.
My approach is below:



Let partition P = {0 , 1/n , 2/n , ..... , (n-1)/n , n/n}.



So, U(P,f) = ∑(1/n) . { f(1/n) + f(2/n) + ....... + f(n/n) }

And, L(p,f) = ∑(1/n) . { f(0) + f(2/n) + ....... + f(n-1/n) }

Then, U(P,f) - L(P,f) = ( f(n/n) - f(0) )/n
= 1/n -> 0



Hint to solution given :
link is here



I am very confused over how did they get the result 1/n² , instead of my 1/n . Please help me out.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    I believe the hint is wrong.
    – B. Goddard
    Nov 17 at 13:42















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have to show that f is integrable using the Riemann criterion where
f(x) = x on [0, 1]. I am a bit confused over how my solution differs from the hint to solution of that question I have.
My approach is below:



Let partition P = {0 , 1/n , 2/n , ..... , (n-1)/n , n/n}.



So, U(P,f) = ∑(1/n) . { f(1/n) + f(2/n) + ....... + f(n/n) }

And, L(p,f) = ∑(1/n) . { f(0) + f(2/n) + ....... + f(n-1/n) }

Then, U(P,f) - L(P,f) = ( f(n/n) - f(0) )/n
= 1/n -> 0



Hint to solution given :
link is here



I am very confused over how did they get the result 1/n² , instead of my 1/n . Please help me out.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    I believe the hint is wrong.
    – B. Goddard
    Nov 17 at 13:42













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I have to show that f is integrable using the Riemann criterion where
f(x) = x on [0, 1]. I am a bit confused over how my solution differs from the hint to solution of that question I have.
My approach is below:



Let partition P = {0 , 1/n , 2/n , ..... , (n-1)/n , n/n}.



So, U(P,f) = ∑(1/n) . { f(1/n) + f(2/n) + ....... + f(n/n) }

And, L(p,f) = ∑(1/n) . { f(0) + f(2/n) + ....... + f(n-1/n) }

Then, U(P,f) - L(P,f) = ( f(n/n) - f(0) )/n
= 1/n -> 0



Hint to solution given :
link is here



I am very confused over how did they get the result 1/n² , instead of my 1/n . Please help me out.










share|cite|improve this question















I have to show that f is integrable using the Riemann criterion where
f(x) = x on [0, 1]. I am a bit confused over how my solution differs from the hint to solution of that question I have.
My approach is below:



Let partition P = {0 , 1/n , 2/n , ..... , (n-1)/n , n/n}.



So, U(P,f) = ∑(1/n) . { f(1/n) + f(2/n) + ....... + f(n/n) }

And, L(p,f) = ∑(1/n) . { f(0) + f(2/n) + ....... + f(n-1/n) }

Then, U(P,f) - L(P,f) = ( f(n/n) - f(0) )/n
= 1/n -> 0



Hint to solution given :
link is here



I am very confused over how did they get the result 1/n² , instead of my 1/n . Please help me out.







calculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 17 at 10:42









Parcly Taxel

41k137199




41k137199










asked Nov 17 at 10:42









Kaustav Bhattacharjee

61




61








  • 1




    I believe the hint is wrong.
    – B. Goddard
    Nov 17 at 13:42














  • 1




    I believe the hint is wrong.
    – B. Goddard
    Nov 17 at 13:42








1




1




I believe the hint is wrong.
– B. Goddard
Nov 17 at 13:42




I believe the hint is wrong.
– B. Goddard
Nov 17 at 13:42















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002195%2fupper-and-lower-sum-answer-not-matching%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002195%2fupper-and-lower-sum-answer-not-matching%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bundesstraße 106

Verónica Boquete

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten