Solutions to that $frac{du}{dt}=u^{a}$
Show that $frac{du}{dt}$=$u^{a}$ where $u(0)=0$ has two soultions for $0<a<1$ and one solution for $a=0,1$
I have tried integrating this by saying
$intfrac{du}{u^{a}}$=$int{1}dt$
which gave me the horrible solution of
$$frac{u(t)}{(u(t))^{a}}=(t+c)(1-a)$$ and assuming that is correct how do I proceed to show that the solutions depend on $a$?
differential-equations dynamical-systems
add a comment |
Show that $frac{du}{dt}$=$u^{a}$ where $u(0)=0$ has two soultions for $0<a<1$ and one solution for $a=0,1$
I have tried integrating this by saying
$intfrac{du}{u^{a}}$=$int{1}dt$
which gave me the horrible solution of
$$frac{u(t)}{(u(t))^{a}}=(t+c)(1-a)$$ and assuming that is correct how do I proceed to show that the solutions depend on $a$?
differential-equations dynamical-systems
Did you try compute this $$frac{du}{dt} = u^a Longrightarrow u^{-a} frac{du}{dt} = 1 Longrightarrow int u^{-a} frac{du}{dt} dt = int 1 dt Longrightarrow int frac{1}{-a+1} frac{du^{-a+1}}{dt} dt = int 1 dt $$ ?
– George
Nov 1 '18 at 13:54
First, note that you can divide by $u^a$ only if it is nonzero. So you actually have two possibilities: $u=0$ or what you got. Why do you say it is "horrible"? Can you solve that for $u(t)$?
– GEdgar
Nov 1 '18 at 13:54
In general threre are a lot more than two solutions. For example, for $a=1/2$, $$ u(t) = begin{cases} 0 & t<k \ tfrac14(t-k)^2 & tge k end{cases} $$ is a solution for every $kge 0$.
– Henning Makholm
Nov 1 '18 at 13:55
I couldn't solve explicitly for $u(t)$ after I computed the integration above, which is why I thought it was horrible. So is my conclusion that there are only 2 solutions given that u is either 0 or the implicit solution I have shown above?
– Robbie Meaney
Nov 1 '18 at 13:58
add a comment |
Show that $frac{du}{dt}$=$u^{a}$ where $u(0)=0$ has two soultions for $0<a<1$ and one solution for $a=0,1$
I have tried integrating this by saying
$intfrac{du}{u^{a}}$=$int{1}dt$
which gave me the horrible solution of
$$frac{u(t)}{(u(t))^{a}}=(t+c)(1-a)$$ and assuming that is correct how do I proceed to show that the solutions depend on $a$?
differential-equations dynamical-systems
Show that $frac{du}{dt}$=$u^{a}$ where $u(0)=0$ has two soultions for $0<a<1$ and one solution for $a=0,1$
I have tried integrating this by saying
$intfrac{du}{u^{a}}$=$int{1}dt$
which gave me the horrible solution of
$$frac{u(t)}{(u(t))^{a}}=(t+c)(1-a)$$ and assuming that is correct how do I proceed to show that the solutions depend on $a$?
differential-equations dynamical-systems
differential-equations dynamical-systems
edited Nov 1 '18 at 13:48
George
801515
801515
asked Nov 1 '18 at 13:46
Robbie Meaney
749
749
Did you try compute this $$frac{du}{dt} = u^a Longrightarrow u^{-a} frac{du}{dt} = 1 Longrightarrow int u^{-a} frac{du}{dt} dt = int 1 dt Longrightarrow int frac{1}{-a+1} frac{du^{-a+1}}{dt} dt = int 1 dt $$ ?
– George
Nov 1 '18 at 13:54
First, note that you can divide by $u^a$ only if it is nonzero. So you actually have two possibilities: $u=0$ or what you got. Why do you say it is "horrible"? Can you solve that for $u(t)$?
– GEdgar
Nov 1 '18 at 13:54
In general threre are a lot more than two solutions. For example, for $a=1/2$, $$ u(t) = begin{cases} 0 & t<k \ tfrac14(t-k)^2 & tge k end{cases} $$ is a solution for every $kge 0$.
– Henning Makholm
Nov 1 '18 at 13:55
I couldn't solve explicitly for $u(t)$ after I computed the integration above, which is why I thought it was horrible. So is my conclusion that there are only 2 solutions given that u is either 0 or the implicit solution I have shown above?
– Robbie Meaney
Nov 1 '18 at 13:58
add a comment |
Did you try compute this $$frac{du}{dt} = u^a Longrightarrow u^{-a} frac{du}{dt} = 1 Longrightarrow int u^{-a} frac{du}{dt} dt = int 1 dt Longrightarrow int frac{1}{-a+1} frac{du^{-a+1}}{dt} dt = int 1 dt $$ ?
– George
Nov 1 '18 at 13:54
First, note that you can divide by $u^a$ only if it is nonzero. So you actually have two possibilities: $u=0$ or what you got. Why do you say it is "horrible"? Can you solve that for $u(t)$?
– GEdgar
Nov 1 '18 at 13:54
In general threre are a lot more than two solutions. For example, for $a=1/2$, $$ u(t) = begin{cases} 0 & t<k \ tfrac14(t-k)^2 & tge k end{cases} $$ is a solution for every $kge 0$.
– Henning Makholm
Nov 1 '18 at 13:55
I couldn't solve explicitly for $u(t)$ after I computed the integration above, which is why I thought it was horrible. So is my conclusion that there are only 2 solutions given that u is either 0 or the implicit solution I have shown above?
– Robbie Meaney
Nov 1 '18 at 13:58
Did you try compute this $$frac{du}{dt} = u^a Longrightarrow u^{-a} frac{du}{dt} = 1 Longrightarrow int u^{-a} frac{du}{dt} dt = int 1 dt Longrightarrow int frac{1}{-a+1} frac{du^{-a+1}}{dt} dt = int 1 dt $$ ?
– George
Nov 1 '18 at 13:54
Did you try compute this $$frac{du}{dt} = u^a Longrightarrow u^{-a} frac{du}{dt} = 1 Longrightarrow int u^{-a} frac{du}{dt} dt = int 1 dt Longrightarrow int frac{1}{-a+1} frac{du^{-a+1}}{dt} dt = int 1 dt $$ ?
– George
Nov 1 '18 at 13:54
First, note that you can divide by $u^a$ only if it is nonzero. So you actually have two possibilities: $u=0$ or what you got. Why do you say it is "horrible"? Can you solve that for $u(t)$?
– GEdgar
Nov 1 '18 at 13:54
First, note that you can divide by $u^a$ only if it is nonzero. So you actually have two possibilities: $u=0$ or what you got. Why do you say it is "horrible"? Can you solve that for $u(t)$?
– GEdgar
Nov 1 '18 at 13:54
In general threre are a lot more than two solutions. For example, for $a=1/2$, $$ u(t) = begin{cases} 0 & t<k \ tfrac14(t-k)^2 & tge k end{cases} $$ is a solution for every $kge 0$.
– Henning Makholm
Nov 1 '18 at 13:55
In general threre are a lot more than two solutions. For example, for $a=1/2$, $$ u(t) = begin{cases} 0 & t<k \ tfrac14(t-k)^2 & tge k end{cases} $$ is a solution for every $kge 0$.
– Henning Makholm
Nov 1 '18 at 13:55
I couldn't solve explicitly for $u(t)$ after I computed the integration above, which is why I thought it was horrible. So is my conclusion that there are only 2 solutions given that u is either 0 or the implicit solution I have shown above?
– Robbie Meaney
Nov 1 '18 at 13:58
I couldn't solve explicitly for $u(t)$ after I computed the integration above, which is why I thought it was horrible. So is my conclusion that there are only 2 solutions given that u is either 0 or the implicit solution I have shown above?
– Robbie Meaney
Nov 1 '18 at 13:58
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The first step in solving the problem is to note that $u(t)=0$ is always a solution of the ODE Cauchy problem under analysis, i.e. of
$$
begin{cases}
dfrac{mathrm{d}u(t)}{mathrm{d}t}=u^a(t) \
\
u(0)equiv u_0=0
end{cases}quad0le ale 1.tag{1}label{1}
$$
The second step is trying to find another solution of the problem eqref{1} in the "critical exponent" case, i.e. $0< a<1$. As the already noted by the OP, the best way to do so is perhaps to use the standard Barrow's formula ([1], §1.5 p. 19),
$$
t-t_0=intlimits_{u_0}^{u(t)}frac{mathrm{d}xi}{v(xi)}tag{2a}label{2a}
$$
which, for our problem eqref{1}, takes the form:
$$
t=intlimits_{0}^{u(t)}frac{mathrm{d}xi}{xi^a}tag{2b}label{2b}
$$
Now, it's easy to see that the integral at the right side of eqref{2b} is not defined for $a=1$ (and thus in this case it does not represent a solution for eqref{1}), while for $aneq 1$ we have
$$
u(t)=
begin{cases}
0& a=0\
left(dfrac{t}{1-a}right)^frac{1}{1-a} &0<a<1
end{cases}tag{3}label{3}
$$
Now we have reached our goal: in step 1 and step 2 we have shown that eqref{1} has one solution $u(t)=0$ if $a=0,1$, and has at least two solutions, given by the following formula
$$
u(t)=
begin{cases}
0\
left(dfrac{t}{1-a}right)^frac{1}{1-a}
end{cases}text{ for } 0<a<1
$$
Final note: for $a=0,1$ it can be proved that the shown solutions are de facto unique. The related existence and uniqueness theorem ([1], §2.2 p. 36), says that if $v:mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}$ is continuously differentiable, then the solution of the given Cauchy problem exists, is unique and is given by formula eqref{2a} if $v(u_0)neq 0$, or by
$$
quad u(t)=u_0=mathrm{const.}:text{ if }v(u_0)=0tag{4}label{4}
$$
(solutions of type $eqref{4}$ are commonly called equilibrium points). Thus, in the class of Cauchy problems to which eqref{1} belongs, a general method to determine the non uniqueness of the solution is to check if $v(u)notin C^1$ and, in case of affirmative answer, see if there are equilibrium points and other, non constant solutions, that have the same equilibrium point as initial value.
[1] Vladimir Igorevic Arnol'd, "Ordinary differential equations", various editions from MIT Press and from Springer-Verlag, MR1162307 Zbl 0744.34001.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2980423%2fsolutions-to-that-fracdudt-ua%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The first step in solving the problem is to note that $u(t)=0$ is always a solution of the ODE Cauchy problem under analysis, i.e. of
$$
begin{cases}
dfrac{mathrm{d}u(t)}{mathrm{d}t}=u^a(t) \
\
u(0)equiv u_0=0
end{cases}quad0le ale 1.tag{1}label{1}
$$
The second step is trying to find another solution of the problem eqref{1} in the "critical exponent" case, i.e. $0< a<1$. As the already noted by the OP, the best way to do so is perhaps to use the standard Barrow's formula ([1], §1.5 p. 19),
$$
t-t_0=intlimits_{u_0}^{u(t)}frac{mathrm{d}xi}{v(xi)}tag{2a}label{2a}
$$
which, for our problem eqref{1}, takes the form:
$$
t=intlimits_{0}^{u(t)}frac{mathrm{d}xi}{xi^a}tag{2b}label{2b}
$$
Now, it's easy to see that the integral at the right side of eqref{2b} is not defined for $a=1$ (and thus in this case it does not represent a solution for eqref{1}), while for $aneq 1$ we have
$$
u(t)=
begin{cases}
0& a=0\
left(dfrac{t}{1-a}right)^frac{1}{1-a} &0<a<1
end{cases}tag{3}label{3}
$$
Now we have reached our goal: in step 1 and step 2 we have shown that eqref{1} has one solution $u(t)=0$ if $a=0,1$, and has at least two solutions, given by the following formula
$$
u(t)=
begin{cases}
0\
left(dfrac{t}{1-a}right)^frac{1}{1-a}
end{cases}text{ for } 0<a<1
$$
Final note: for $a=0,1$ it can be proved that the shown solutions are de facto unique. The related existence and uniqueness theorem ([1], §2.2 p. 36), says that if $v:mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}$ is continuously differentiable, then the solution of the given Cauchy problem exists, is unique and is given by formula eqref{2a} if $v(u_0)neq 0$, or by
$$
quad u(t)=u_0=mathrm{const.}:text{ if }v(u_0)=0tag{4}label{4}
$$
(solutions of type $eqref{4}$ are commonly called equilibrium points). Thus, in the class of Cauchy problems to which eqref{1} belongs, a general method to determine the non uniqueness of the solution is to check if $v(u)notin C^1$ and, in case of affirmative answer, see if there are equilibrium points and other, non constant solutions, that have the same equilibrium point as initial value.
[1] Vladimir Igorevic Arnol'd, "Ordinary differential equations", various editions from MIT Press and from Springer-Verlag, MR1162307 Zbl 0744.34001.
add a comment |
The first step in solving the problem is to note that $u(t)=0$ is always a solution of the ODE Cauchy problem under analysis, i.e. of
$$
begin{cases}
dfrac{mathrm{d}u(t)}{mathrm{d}t}=u^a(t) \
\
u(0)equiv u_0=0
end{cases}quad0le ale 1.tag{1}label{1}
$$
The second step is trying to find another solution of the problem eqref{1} in the "critical exponent" case, i.e. $0< a<1$. As the already noted by the OP, the best way to do so is perhaps to use the standard Barrow's formula ([1], §1.5 p. 19),
$$
t-t_0=intlimits_{u_0}^{u(t)}frac{mathrm{d}xi}{v(xi)}tag{2a}label{2a}
$$
which, for our problem eqref{1}, takes the form:
$$
t=intlimits_{0}^{u(t)}frac{mathrm{d}xi}{xi^a}tag{2b}label{2b}
$$
Now, it's easy to see that the integral at the right side of eqref{2b} is not defined for $a=1$ (and thus in this case it does not represent a solution for eqref{1}), while for $aneq 1$ we have
$$
u(t)=
begin{cases}
0& a=0\
left(dfrac{t}{1-a}right)^frac{1}{1-a} &0<a<1
end{cases}tag{3}label{3}
$$
Now we have reached our goal: in step 1 and step 2 we have shown that eqref{1} has one solution $u(t)=0$ if $a=0,1$, and has at least two solutions, given by the following formula
$$
u(t)=
begin{cases}
0\
left(dfrac{t}{1-a}right)^frac{1}{1-a}
end{cases}text{ for } 0<a<1
$$
Final note: for $a=0,1$ it can be proved that the shown solutions are de facto unique. The related existence and uniqueness theorem ([1], §2.2 p. 36), says that if $v:mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}$ is continuously differentiable, then the solution of the given Cauchy problem exists, is unique and is given by formula eqref{2a} if $v(u_0)neq 0$, or by
$$
quad u(t)=u_0=mathrm{const.}:text{ if }v(u_0)=0tag{4}label{4}
$$
(solutions of type $eqref{4}$ are commonly called equilibrium points). Thus, in the class of Cauchy problems to which eqref{1} belongs, a general method to determine the non uniqueness of the solution is to check if $v(u)notin C^1$ and, in case of affirmative answer, see if there are equilibrium points and other, non constant solutions, that have the same equilibrium point as initial value.
[1] Vladimir Igorevic Arnol'd, "Ordinary differential equations", various editions from MIT Press and from Springer-Verlag, MR1162307 Zbl 0744.34001.
add a comment |
The first step in solving the problem is to note that $u(t)=0$ is always a solution of the ODE Cauchy problem under analysis, i.e. of
$$
begin{cases}
dfrac{mathrm{d}u(t)}{mathrm{d}t}=u^a(t) \
\
u(0)equiv u_0=0
end{cases}quad0le ale 1.tag{1}label{1}
$$
The second step is trying to find another solution of the problem eqref{1} in the "critical exponent" case, i.e. $0< a<1$. As the already noted by the OP, the best way to do so is perhaps to use the standard Barrow's formula ([1], §1.5 p. 19),
$$
t-t_0=intlimits_{u_0}^{u(t)}frac{mathrm{d}xi}{v(xi)}tag{2a}label{2a}
$$
which, for our problem eqref{1}, takes the form:
$$
t=intlimits_{0}^{u(t)}frac{mathrm{d}xi}{xi^a}tag{2b}label{2b}
$$
Now, it's easy to see that the integral at the right side of eqref{2b} is not defined for $a=1$ (and thus in this case it does not represent a solution for eqref{1}), while for $aneq 1$ we have
$$
u(t)=
begin{cases}
0& a=0\
left(dfrac{t}{1-a}right)^frac{1}{1-a} &0<a<1
end{cases}tag{3}label{3}
$$
Now we have reached our goal: in step 1 and step 2 we have shown that eqref{1} has one solution $u(t)=0$ if $a=0,1$, and has at least two solutions, given by the following formula
$$
u(t)=
begin{cases}
0\
left(dfrac{t}{1-a}right)^frac{1}{1-a}
end{cases}text{ for } 0<a<1
$$
Final note: for $a=0,1$ it can be proved that the shown solutions are de facto unique. The related existence and uniqueness theorem ([1], §2.2 p. 36), says that if $v:mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}$ is continuously differentiable, then the solution of the given Cauchy problem exists, is unique and is given by formula eqref{2a} if $v(u_0)neq 0$, or by
$$
quad u(t)=u_0=mathrm{const.}:text{ if }v(u_0)=0tag{4}label{4}
$$
(solutions of type $eqref{4}$ are commonly called equilibrium points). Thus, in the class of Cauchy problems to which eqref{1} belongs, a general method to determine the non uniqueness of the solution is to check if $v(u)notin C^1$ and, in case of affirmative answer, see if there are equilibrium points and other, non constant solutions, that have the same equilibrium point as initial value.
[1] Vladimir Igorevic Arnol'd, "Ordinary differential equations", various editions from MIT Press and from Springer-Verlag, MR1162307 Zbl 0744.34001.
The first step in solving the problem is to note that $u(t)=0$ is always a solution of the ODE Cauchy problem under analysis, i.e. of
$$
begin{cases}
dfrac{mathrm{d}u(t)}{mathrm{d}t}=u^a(t) \
\
u(0)equiv u_0=0
end{cases}quad0le ale 1.tag{1}label{1}
$$
The second step is trying to find another solution of the problem eqref{1} in the "critical exponent" case, i.e. $0< a<1$. As the already noted by the OP, the best way to do so is perhaps to use the standard Barrow's formula ([1], §1.5 p. 19),
$$
t-t_0=intlimits_{u_0}^{u(t)}frac{mathrm{d}xi}{v(xi)}tag{2a}label{2a}
$$
which, for our problem eqref{1}, takes the form:
$$
t=intlimits_{0}^{u(t)}frac{mathrm{d}xi}{xi^a}tag{2b}label{2b}
$$
Now, it's easy to see that the integral at the right side of eqref{2b} is not defined for $a=1$ (and thus in this case it does not represent a solution for eqref{1}), while for $aneq 1$ we have
$$
u(t)=
begin{cases}
0& a=0\
left(dfrac{t}{1-a}right)^frac{1}{1-a} &0<a<1
end{cases}tag{3}label{3}
$$
Now we have reached our goal: in step 1 and step 2 we have shown that eqref{1} has one solution $u(t)=0$ if $a=0,1$, and has at least two solutions, given by the following formula
$$
u(t)=
begin{cases}
0\
left(dfrac{t}{1-a}right)^frac{1}{1-a}
end{cases}text{ for } 0<a<1
$$
Final note: for $a=0,1$ it can be proved that the shown solutions are de facto unique. The related existence and uniqueness theorem ([1], §2.2 p. 36), says that if $v:mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}$ is continuously differentiable, then the solution of the given Cauchy problem exists, is unique and is given by formula eqref{2a} if $v(u_0)neq 0$, or by
$$
quad u(t)=u_0=mathrm{const.}:text{ if }v(u_0)=0tag{4}label{4}
$$
(solutions of type $eqref{4}$ are commonly called equilibrium points). Thus, in the class of Cauchy problems to which eqref{1} belongs, a general method to determine the non uniqueness of the solution is to check if $v(u)notin C^1$ and, in case of affirmative answer, see if there are equilibrium points and other, non constant solutions, that have the same equilibrium point as initial value.
[1] Vladimir Igorevic Arnol'd, "Ordinary differential equations", various editions from MIT Press and from Springer-Verlag, MR1162307 Zbl 0744.34001.
edited Nov 28 '18 at 19:12
answered Nov 1 '18 at 21:18
Daniele Tampieri
1,8301619
1,8301619
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2980423%2fsolutions-to-that-fracdudt-ua%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Did you try compute this $$frac{du}{dt} = u^a Longrightarrow u^{-a} frac{du}{dt} = 1 Longrightarrow int u^{-a} frac{du}{dt} dt = int 1 dt Longrightarrow int frac{1}{-a+1} frac{du^{-a+1}}{dt} dt = int 1 dt $$ ?
– George
Nov 1 '18 at 13:54
First, note that you can divide by $u^a$ only if it is nonzero. So you actually have two possibilities: $u=0$ or what you got. Why do you say it is "horrible"? Can you solve that for $u(t)$?
– GEdgar
Nov 1 '18 at 13:54
In general threre are a lot more than two solutions. For example, for $a=1/2$, $$ u(t) = begin{cases} 0 & t<k \ tfrac14(t-k)^2 & tge k end{cases} $$ is a solution for every $kge 0$.
– Henning Makholm
Nov 1 '18 at 13:55
I couldn't solve explicitly for $u(t)$ after I computed the integration above, which is why I thought it was horrible. So is my conclusion that there are only 2 solutions given that u is either 0 or the implicit solution I have shown above?
– Robbie Meaney
Nov 1 '18 at 13:58