Solutions to that $frac{du}{dt}=u^{a}$












1














Show that $frac{du}{dt}$=$u^{a}$ where $u(0)=0$ has two soultions for $0<a<1$ and one solution for $a=0,1$



I have tried integrating this by saying
$intfrac{du}{u^{a}}$=$int{1}dt$
which gave me the horrible solution of



$$frac{u(t)}{(u(t))^{a}}=(t+c)(1-a)$$ and assuming that is correct how do I proceed to show that the solutions depend on $a$?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Did you try compute this $$frac{du}{dt} = u^a Longrightarrow u^{-a} frac{du}{dt} = 1 Longrightarrow int u^{-a} frac{du}{dt} dt = int 1 dt Longrightarrow int frac{1}{-a+1} frac{du^{-a+1}}{dt} dt = int 1 dt $$ ?
    – George
    Nov 1 '18 at 13:54










  • First, note that you can divide by $u^a$ only if it is nonzero. So you actually have two possibilities: $u=0$ or what you got. Why do you say it is "horrible"? Can you solve that for $u(t)$?
    – GEdgar
    Nov 1 '18 at 13:54










  • In general threre are a lot more than two solutions. For example, for $a=1/2$, $$ u(t) = begin{cases} 0 & t<k \ tfrac14(t-k)^2 & tge k end{cases} $$ is a solution for every $kge 0$.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 1 '18 at 13:55












  • I couldn't solve explicitly for $u(t)$ after I computed the integration above, which is why I thought it was horrible. So is my conclusion that there are only 2 solutions given that u is either 0 or the implicit solution I have shown above?
    – Robbie Meaney
    Nov 1 '18 at 13:58
















1














Show that $frac{du}{dt}$=$u^{a}$ where $u(0)=0$ has two soultions for $0<a<1$ and one solution for $a=0,1$



I have tried integrating this by saying
$intfrac{du}{u^{a}}$=$int{1}dt$
which gave me the horrible solution of



$$frac{u(t)}{(u(t))^{a}}=(t+c)(1-a)$$ and assuming that is correct how do I proceed to show that the solutions depend on $a$?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Did you try compute this $$frac{du}{dt} = u^a Longrightarrow u^{-a} frac{du}{dt} = 1 Longrightarrow int u^{-a} frac{du}{dt} dt = int 1 dt Longrightarrow int frac{1}{-a+1} frac{du^{-a+1}}{dt} dt = int 1 dt $$ ?
    – George
    Nov 1 '18 at 13:54










  • First, note that you can divide by $u^a$ only if it is nonzero. So you actually have two possibilities: $u=0$ or what you got. Why do you say it is "horrible"? Can you solve that for $u(t)$?
    – GEdgar
    Nov 1 '18 at 13:54










  • In general threre are a lot more than two solutions. For example, for $a=1/2$, $$ u(t) = begin{cases} 0 & t<k \ tfrac14(t-k)^2 & tge k end{cases} $$ is a solution for every $kge 0$.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 1 '18 at 13:55












  • I couldn't solve explicitly for $u(t)$ after I computed the integration above, which is why I thought it was horrible. So is my conclusion that there are only 2 solutions given that u is either 0 or the implicit solution I have shown above?
    – Robbie Meaney
    Nov 1 '18 at 13:58














1












1








1







Show that $frac{du}{dt}$=$u^{a}$ where $u(0)=0$ has two soultions for $0<a<1$ and one solution for $a=0,1$



I have tried integrating this by saying
$intfrac{du}{u^{a}}$=$int{1}dt$
which gave me the horrible solution of



$$frac{u(t)}{(u(t))^{a}}=(t+c)(1-a)$$ and assuming that is correct how do I proceed to show that the solutions depend on $a$?










share|cite|improve this question















Show that $frac{du}{dt}$=$u^{a}$ where $u(0)=0$ has two soultions for $0<a<1$ and one solution for $a=0,1$



I have tried integrating this by saying
$intfrac{du}{u^{a}}$=$int{1}dt$
which gave me the horrible solution of



$$frac{u(t)}{(u(t))^{a}}=(t+c)(1-a)$$ and assuming that is correct how do I proceed to show that the solutions depend on $a$?







differential-equations dynamical-systems






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 1 '18 at 13:48









George

801515




801515










asked Nov 1 '18 at 13:46









Robbie Meaney

749




749












  • Did you try compute this $$frac{du}{dt} = u^a Longrightarrow u^{-a} frac{du}{dt} = 1 Longrightarrow int u^{-a} frac{du}{dt} dt = int 1 dt Longrightarrow int frac{1}{-a+1} frac{du^{-a+1}}{dt} dt = int 1 dt $$ ?
    – George
    Nov 1 '18 at 13:54










  • First, note that you can divide by $u^a$ only if it is nonzero. So you actually have two possibilities: $u=0$ or what you got. Why do you say it is "horrible"? Can you solve that for $u(t)$?
    – GEdgar
    Nov 1 '18 at 13:54










  • In general threre are a lot more than two solutions. For example, for $a=1/2$, $$ u(t) = begin{cases} 0 & t<k \ tfrac14(t-k)^2 & tge k end{cases} $$ is a solution for every $kge 0$.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 1 '18 at 13:55












  • I couldn't solve explicitly for $u(t)$ after I computed the integration above, which is why I thought it was horrible. So is my conclusion that there are only 2 solutions given that u is either 0 or the implicit solution I have shown above?
    – Robbie Meaney
    Nov 1 '18 at 13:58


















  • Did you try compute this $$frac{du}{dt} = u^a Longrightarrow u^{-a} frac{du}{dt} = 1 Longrightarrow int u^{-a} frac{du}{dt} dt = int 1 dt Longrightarrow int frac{1}{-a+1} frac{du^{-a+1}}{dt} dt = int 1 dt $$ ?
    – George
    Nov 1 '18 at 13:54










  • First, note that you can divide by $u^a$ only if it is nonzero. So you actually have two possibilities: $u=0$ or what you got. Why do you say it is "horrible"? Can you solve that for $u(t)$?
    – GEdgar
    Nov 1 '18 at 13:54










  • In general threre are a lot more than two solutions. For example, for $a=1/2$, $$ u(t) = begin{cases} 0 & t<k \ tfrac14(t-k)^2 & tge k end{cases} $$ is a solution for every $kge 0$.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 1 '18 at 13:55












  • I couldn't solve explicitly for $u(t)$ after I computed the integration above, which is why I thought it was horrible. So is my conclusion that there are only 2 solutions given that u is either 0 or the implicit solution I have shown above?
    – Robbie Meaney
    Nov 1 '18 at 13:58
















Did you try compute this $$frac{du}{dt} = u^a Longrightarrow u^{-a} frac{du}{dt} = 1 Longrightarrow int u^{-a} frac{du}{dt} dt = int 1 dt Longrightarrow int frac{1}{-a+1} frac{du^{-a+1}}{dt} dt = int 1 dt $$ ?
– George
Nov 1 '18 at 13:54




Did you try compute this $$frac{du}{dt} = u^a Longrightarrow u^{-a} frac{du}{dt} = 1 Longrightarrow int u^{-a} frac{du}{dt} dt = int 1 dt Longrightarrow int frac{1}{-a+1} frac{du^{-a+1}}{dt} dt = int 1 dt $$ ?
– George
Nov 1 '18 at 13:54












First, note that you can divide by $u^a$ only if it is nonzero. So you actually have two possibilities: $u=0$ or what you got. Why do you say it is "horrible"? Can you solve that for $u(t)$?
– GEdgar
Nov 1 '18 at 13:54




First, note that you can divide by $u^a$ only if it is nonzero. So you actually have two possibilities: $u=0$ or what you got. Why do you say it is "horrible"? Can you solve that for $u(t)$?
– GEdgar
Nov 1 '18 at 13:54












In general threre are a lot more than two solutions. For example, for $a=1/2$, $$ u(t) = begin{cases} 0 & t<k \ tfrac14(t-k)^2 & tge k end{cases} $$ is a solution for every $kge 0$.
– Henning Makholm
Nov 1 '18 at 13:55






In general threre are a lot more than two solutions. For example, for $a=1/2$, $$ u(t) = begin{cases} 0 & t<k \ tfrac14(t-k)^2 & tge k end{cases} $$ is a solution for every $kge 0$.
– Henning Makholm
Nov 1 '18 at 13:55














I couldn't solve explicitly for $u(t)$ after I computed the integration above, which is why I thought it was horrible. So is my conclusion that there are only 2 solutions given that u is either 0 or the implicit solution I have shown above?
– Robbie Meaney
Nov 1 '18 at 13:58




I couldn't solve explicitly for $u(t)$ after I computed the integration above, which is why I thought it was horrible. So is my conclusion that there are only 2 solutions given that u is either 0 or the implicit solution I have shown above?
– Robbie Meaney
Nov 1 '18 at 13:58










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














The first step in solving the problem is to note that $u(t)=0$ is always a solution of the ODE Cauchy problem under analysis, i.e. of
$$
begin{cases}
dfrac{mathrm{d}u(t)}{mathrm{d}t}=u^a(t) \
\
u(0)equiv u_0=0
end{cases}quad0le ale 1.tag{1}label{1}
$$

The second step is trying to find another solution of the problem eqref{1} in the "critical exponent" case, i.e. $0< a<1$. As the already noted by the OP, the best way to do so is perhaps to use the standard Barrow's formula ([1], §1.5 p. 19),
$$
t-t_0=intlimits_{u_0}^{u(t)}frac{mathrm{d}xi}{v(xi)}tag{2a}label{2a}
$$

which, for our problem eqref{1}, takes the form:
$$
t=intlimits_{0}^{u(t)}frac{mathrm{d}xi}{xi^a}tag{2b}label{2b}
$$

Now, it's easy to see that the integral at the right side of eqref{2b} is not defined for $a=1$ (and thus in this case it does not represent a solution for eqref{1}), while for $aneq 1$ we have
$$
u(t)=
begin{cases}
0& a=0\
left(dfrac{t}{1-a}right)^frac{1}{1-a} &0<a<1
end{cases}tag{3}label{3}
$$

Now we have reached our goal: in step 1 and step 2 we have shown that eqref{1} has one solution $u(t)=0$ if $a=0,1$, and has at least two solutions, given by the following formula
$$
u(t)=
begin{cases}
0\
left(dfrac{t}{1-a}right)^frac{1}{1-a}
end{cases}text{ for } 0<a<1
$$



Final note: for $a=0,1$ it can be proved that the shown solutions are de facto unique. The related existence and uniqueness theorem ([1], §2.2 p. 36), says that if $v:mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}$ is continuously differentiable, then the solution of the given Cauchy problem exists, is unique and is given by formula eqref{2a} if $v(u_0)neq 0$, or by
$$
quad u(t)=u_0=mathrm{const.}:text{ if }v(u_0)=0tag{4}label{4}
$$

(solutions of type $eqref{4}$ are commonly called equilibrium points). Thus, in the class of Cauchy problems to which eqref{1} belongs, a general method to determine the non uniqueness of the solution is to check if $v(u)notin C^1$ and, in case of affirmative answer, see if there are equilibrium points and other, non constant solutions, that have the same equilibrium point as initial value.



[1] Vladimir Igorevic Arnol'd, "Ordinary differential equations", various editions from MIT Press and from Springer-Verlag, MR1162307 Zbl 0744.34001.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2980423%2fsolutions-to-that-fracdudt-ua%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    The first step in solving the problem is to note that $u(t)=0$ is always a solution of the ODE Cauchy problem under analysis, i.e. of
    $$
    begin{cases}
    dfrac{mathrm{d}u(t)}{mathrm{d}t}=u^a(t) \
    \
    u(0)equiv u_0=0
    end{cases}quad0le ale 1.tag{1}label{1}
    $$

    The second step is trying to find another solution of the problem eqref{1} in the "critical exponent" case, i.e. $0< a<1$. As the already noted by the OP, the best way to do so is perhaps to use the standard Barrow's formula ([1], §1.5 p. 19),
    $$
    t-t_0=intlimits_{u_0}^{u(t)}frac{mathrm{d}xi}{v(xi)}tag{2a}label{2a}
    $$

    which, for our problem eqref{1}, takes the form:
    $$
    t=intlimits_{0}^{u(t)}frac{mathrm{d}xi}{xi^a}tag{2b}label{2b}
    $$

    Now, it's easy to see that the integral at the right side of eqref{2b} is not defined for $a=1$ (and thus in this case it does not represent a solution for eqref{1}), while for $aneq 1$ we have
    $$
    u(t)=
    begin{cases}
    0& a=0\
    left(dfrac{t}{1-a}right)^frac{1}{1-a} &0<a<1
    end{cases}tag{3}label{3}
    $$

    Now we have reached our goal: in step 1 and step 2 we have shown that eqref{1} has one solution $u(t)=0$ if $a=0,1$, and has at least two solutions, given by the following formula
    $$
    u(t)=
    begin{cases}
    0\
    left(dfrac{t}{1-a}right)^frac{1}{1-a}
    end{cases}text{ for } 0<a<1
    $$



    Final note: for $a=0,1$ it can be proved that the shown solutions are de facto unique. The related existence and uniqueness theorem ([1], §2.2 p. 36), says that if $v:mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}$ is continuously differentiable, then the solution of the given Cauchy problem exists, is unique and is given by formula eqref{2a} if $v(u_0)neq 0$, or by
    $$
    quad u(t)=u_0=mathrm{const.}:text{ if }v(u_0)=0tag{4}label{4}
    $$

    (solutions of type $eqref{4}$ are commonly called equilibrium points). Thus, in the class of Cauchy problems to which eqref{1} belongs, a general method to determine the non uniqueness of the solution is to check if $v(u)notin C^1$ and, in case of affirmative answer, see if there are equilibrium points and other, non constant solutions, that have the same equilibrium point as initial value.



    [1] Vladimir Igorevic Arnol'd, "Ordinary differential equations", various editions from MIT Press and from Springer-Verlag, MR1162307 Zbl 0744.34001.






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      2














      The first step in solving the problem is to note that $u(t)=0$ is always a solution of the ODE Cauchy problem under analysis, i.e. of
      $$
      begin{cases}
      dfrac{mathrm{d}u(t)}{mathrm{d}t}=u^a(t) \
      \
      u(0)equiv u_0=0
      end{cases}quad0le ale 1.tag{1}label{1}
      $$

      The second step is trying to find another solution of the problem eqref{1} in the "critical exponent" case, i.e. $0< a<1$. As the already noted by the OP, the best way to do so is perhaps to use the standard Barrow's formula ([1], §1.5 p. 19),
      $$
      t-t_0=intlimits_{u_0}^{u(t)}frac{mathrm{d}xi}{v(xi)}tag{2a}label{2a}
      $$

      which, for our problem eqref{1}, takes the form:
      $$
      t=intlimits_{0}^{u(t)}frac{mathrm{d}xi}{xi^a}tag{2b}label{2b}
      $$

      Now, it's easy to see that the integral at the right side of eqref{2b} is not defined for $a=1$ (and thus in this case it does not represent a solution for eqref{1}), while for $aneq 1$ we have
      $$
      u(t)=
      begin{cases}
      0& a=0\
      left(dfrac{t}{1-a}right)^frac{1}{1-a} &0<a<1
      end{cases}tag{3}label{3}
      $$

      Now we have reached our goal: in step 1 and step 2 we have shown that eqref{1} has one solution $u(t)=0$ if $a=0,1$, and has at least two solutions, given by the following formula
      $$
      u(t)=
      begin{cases}
      0\
      left(dfrac{t}{1-a}right)^frac{1}{1-a}
      end{cases}text{ for } 0<a<1
      $$



      Final note: for $a=0,1$ it can be proved that the shown solutions are de facto unique. The related existence and uniqueness theorem ([1], §2.2 p. 36), says that if $v:mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}$ is continuously differentiable, then the solution of the given Cauchy problem exists, is unique and is given by formula eqref{2a} if $v(u_0)neq 0$, or by
      $$
      quad u(t)=u_0=mathrm{const.}:text{ if }v(u_0)=0tag{4}label{4}
      $$

      (solutions of type $eqref{4}$ are commonly called equilibrium points). Thus, in the class of Cauchy problems to which eqref{1} belongs, a general method to determine the non uniqueness of the solution is to check if $v(u)notin C^1$ and, in case of affirmative answer, see if there are equilibrium points and other, non constant solutions, that have the same equilibrium point as initial value.



      [1] Vladimir Igorevic Arnol'd, "Ordinary differential equations", various editions from MIT Press and from Springer-Verlag, MR1162307 Zbl 0744.34001.






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        2












        2








        2






        The first step in solving the problem is to note that $u(t)=0$ is always a solution of the ODE Cauchy problem under analysis, i.e. of
        $$
        begin{cases}
        dfrac{mathrm{d}u(t)}{mathrm{d}t}=u^a(t) \
        \
        u(0)equiv u_0=0
        end{cases}quad0le ale 1.tag{1}label{1}
        $$

        The second step is trying to find another solution of the problem eqref{1} in the "critical exponent" case, i.e. $0< a<1$. As the already noted by the OP, the best way to do so is perhaps to use the standard Barrow's formula ([1], §1.5 p. 19),
        $$
        t-t_0=intlimits_{u_0}^{u(t)}frac{mathrm{d}xi}{v(xi)}tag{2a}label{2a}
        $$

        which, for our problem eqref{1}, takes the form:
        $$
        t=intlimits_{0}^{u(t)}frac{mathrm{d}xi}{xi^a}tag{2b}label{2b}
        $$

        Now, it's easy to see that the integral at the right side of eqref{2b} is not defined for $a=1$ (and thus in this case it does not represent a solution for eqref{1}), while for $aneq 1$ we have
        $$
        u(t)=
        begin{cases}
        0& a=0\
        left(dfrac{t}{1-a}right)^frac{1}{1-a} &0<a<1
        end{cases}tag{3}label{3}
        $$

        Now we have reached our goal: in step 1 and step 2 we have shown that eqref{1} has one solution $u(t)=0$ if $a=0,1$, and has at least two solutions, given by the following formula
        $$
        u(t)=
        begin{cases}
        0\
        left(dfrac{t}{1-a}right)^frac{1}{1-a}
        end{cases}text{ for } 0<a<1
        $$



        Final note: for $a=0,1$ it can be proved that the shown solutions are de facto unique. The related existence and uniqueness theorem ([1], §2.2 p. 36), says that if $v:mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}$ is continuously differentiable, then the solution of the given Cauchy problem exists, is unique and is given by formula eqref{2a} if $v(u_0)neq 0$, or by
        $$
        quad u(t)=u_0=mathrm{const.}:text{ if }v(u_0)=0tag{4}label{4}
        $$

        (solutions of type $eqref{4}$ are commonly called equilibrium points). Thus, in the class of Cauchy problems to which eqref{1} belongs, a general method to determine the non uniqueness of the solution is to check if $v(u)notin C^1$ and, in case of affirmative answer, see if there are equilibrium points and other, non constant solutions, that have the same equilibrium point as initial value.



        [1] Vladimir Igorevic Arnol'd, "Ordinary differential equations", various editions from MIT Press and from Springer-Verlag, MR1162307 Zbl 0744.34001.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        The first step in solving the problem is to note that $u(t)=0$ is always a solution of the ODE Cauchy problem under analysis, i.e. of
        $$
        begin{cases}
        dfrac{mathrm{d}u(t)}{mathrm{d}t}=u^a(t) \
        \
        u(0)equiv u_0=0
        end{cases}quad0le ale 1.tag{1}label{1}
        $$

        The second step is trying to find another solution of the problem eqref{1} in the "critical exponent" case, i.e. $0< a<1$. As the already noted by the OP, the best way to do so is perhaps to use the standard Barrow's formula ([1], §1.5 p. 19),
        $$
        t-t_0=intlimits_{u_0}^{u(t)}frac{mathrm{d}xi}{v(xi)}tag{2a}label{2a}
        $$

        which, for our problem eqref{1}, takes the form:
        $$
        t=intlimits_{0}^{u(t)}frac{mathrm{d}xi}{xi^a}tag{2b}label{2b}
        $$

        Now, it's easy to see that the integral at the right side of eqref{2b} is not defined for $a=1$ (and thus in this case it does not represent a solution for eqref{1}), while for $aneq 1$ we have
        $$
        u(t)=
        begin{cases}
        0& a=0\
        left(dfrac{t}{1-a}right)^frac{1}{1-a} &0<a<1
        end{cases}tag{3}label{3}
        $$

        Now we have reached our goal: in step 1 and step 2 we have shown that eqref{1} has one solution $u(t)=0$ if $a=0,1$, and has at least two solutions, given by the following formula
        $$
        u(t)=
        begin{cases}
        0\
        left(dfrac{t}{1-a}right)^frac{1}{1-a}
        end{cases}text{ for } 0<a<1
        $$



        Final note: for $a=0,1$ it can be proved that the shown solutions are de facto unique. The related existence and uniqueness theorem ([1], §2.2 p. 36), says that if $v:mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}$ is continuously differentiable, then the solution of the given Cauchy problem exists, is unique and is given by formula eqref{2a} if $v(u_0)neq 0$, or by
        $$
        quad u(t)=u_0=mathrm{const.}:text{ if }v(u_0)=0tag{4}label{4}
        $$

        (solutions of type $eqref{4}$ are commonly called equilibrium points). Thus, in the class of Cauchy problems to which eqref{1} belongs, a general method to determine the non uniqueness of the solution is to check if $v(u)notin C^1$ and, in case of affirmative answer, see if there are equilibrium points and other, non constant solutions, that have the same equilibrium point as initial value.



        [1] Vladimir Igorevic Arnol'd, "Ordinary differential equations", various editions from MIT Press and from Springer-Verlag, MR1162307 Zbl 0744.34001.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 28 '18 at 19:12

























        answered Nov 1 '18 at 21:18









        Daniele Tampieri

        1,8301619




        1,8301619






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2980423%2fsolutions-to-that-fracdudt-ua%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Verónica Boquete

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten