Understanding the proof of an inequality
Basically the method applied is the following, we fix $a=frac{a_1+a_2+...+a_n}{n}$, if: $$f(x)ge f(a)+f'(a)(x-a) $$This inequality holds for all x, then summing up the inequality will give us the desired conclusion.
That is basically what is stated before the example, now, I've got quite some questions!
1) Why do we have $a=frac{a_1+a_2+...+a_n}{n}$? why is this relevant?
2) When he applies this "tangent line trick" he clearly chooses $a=1$, is there a reason for this particular value? (I mean, there must be a reason since one has to bash through a lot of algebra, no one would do that if they didn't have a good reason to do so...)
3) The last inequality holds for $a ge- frac{1}{2}$, not all a's, so why does this still satisfy our initial method's constraint of 'all x'?
Edit: OP forgot to mention that variables are positive
inequality functional-inequalities tangent-line-method
add a comment |
Basically the method applied is the following, we fix $a=frac{a_1+a_2+...+a_n}{n}$, if: $$f(x)ge f(a)+f'(a)(x-a) $$This inequality holds for all x, then summing up the inequality will give us the desired conclusion.
That is basically what is stated before the example, now, I've got quite some questions!
1) Why do we have $a=frac{a_1+a_2+...+a_n}{n}$? why is this relevant?
2) When he applies this "tangent line trick" he clearly chooses $a=1$, is there a reason for this particular value? (I mean, there must be a reason since one has to bash through a lot of algebra, no one would do that if they didn't have a good reason to do so...)
3) The last inequality holds for $a ge- frac{1}{2}$, not all a's, so why does this still satisfy our initial method's constraint of 'all x'?
Edit: OP forgot to mention that variables are positive
inequality functional-inequalities tangent-line-method
add a comment |
Basically the method applied is the following, we fix $a=frac{a_1+a_2+...+a_n}{n}$, if: $$f(x)ge f(a)+f'(a)(x-a) $$This inequality holds for all x, then summing up the inequality will give us the desired conclusion.
That is basically what is stated before the example, now, I've got quite some questions!
1) Why do we have $a=frac{a_1+a_2+...+a_n}{n}$? why is this relevant?
2) When he applies this "tangent line trick" he clearly chooses $a=1$, is there a reason for this particular value? (I mean, there must be a reason since one has to bash through a lot of algebra, no one would do that if they didn't have a good reason to do so...)
3) The last inequality holds for $a ge- frac{1}{2}$, not all a's, so why does this still satisfy our initial method's constraint of 'all x'?
Edit: OP forgot to mention that variables are positive
inequality functional-inequalities tangent-line-method
Basically the method applied is the following, we fix $a=frac{a_1+a_2+...+a_n}{n}$, if: $$f(x)ge f(a)+f'(a)(x-a) $$This inequality holds for all x, then summing up the inequality will give us the desired conclusion.
That is basically what is stated before the example, now, I've got quite some questions!
1) Why do we have $a=frac{a_1+a_2+...+a_n}{n}$? why is this relevant?
2) When he applies this "tangent line trick" he clearly chooses $a=1$, is there a reason for this particular value? (I mean, there must be a reason since one has to bash through a lot of algebra, no one would do that if they didn't have a good reason to do so...)
3) The last inequality holds for $a ge- frac{1}{2}$, not all a's, so why does this still satisfy our initial method's constraint of 'all x'?
Edit: OP forgot to mention that variables are positive
inequality functional-inequalities tangent-line-method
inequality functional-inequalities tangent-line-method
edited Nov 28 '18 at 21:58
greedoid
38.2k114797
38.2k114797
asked Nov 28 '18 at 21:17
Spasoje Durovic
34110
34110
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
We see that equality is if $a=b=c=1$, so write a tangent on $$f(x) = {(3-2x)^2over x^2+(3-x)^2}$$ at $x_0=1$ and $y_0= f(1) = 1/5$. This line has equation $$y = {1over 5}- {18over 25}(x-1)$$
Now check if $f(x)geq y$ for all $xin (0,3)$ and thus a conclusion.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017720%2funderstanding-the-proof-of-an-inequality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
We see that equality is if $a=b=c=1$, so write a tangent on $$f(x) = {(3-2x)^2over x^2+(3-x)^2}$$ at $x_0=1$ and $y_0= f(1) = 1/5$. This line has equation $$y = {1over 5}- {18over 25}(x-1)$$
Now check if $f(x)geq y$ for all $xin (0,3)$ and thus a conclusion.
add a comment |
We see that equality is if $a=b=c=1$, so write a tangent on $$f(x) = {(3-2x)^2over x^2+(3-x)^2}$$ at $x_0=1$ and $y_0= f(1) = 1/5$. This line has equation $$y = {1over 5}- {18over 25}(x-1)$$
Now check if $f(x)geq y$ for all $xin (0,3)$ and thus a conclusion.
add a comment |
We see that equality is if $a=b=c=1$, so write a tangent on $$f(x) = {(3-2x)^2over x^2+(3-x)^2}$$ at $x_0=1$ and $y_0= f(1) = 1/5$. This line has equation $$y = {1over 5}- {18over 25}(x-1)$$
Now check if $f(x)geq y$ for all $xin (0,3)$ and thus a conclusion.
We see that equality is if $a=b=c=1$, so write a tangent on $$f(x) = {(3-2x)^2over x^2+(3-x)^2}$$ at $x_0=1$ and $y_0= f(1) = 1/5$. This line has equation $$y = {1over 5}- {18over 25}(x-1)$$
Now check if $f(x)geq y$ for all $xin (0,3)$ and thus a conclusion.
answered Nov 28 '18 at 21:25
greedoid
38.2k114797
38.2k114797
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017720%2funderstanding-the-proof-of-an-inequality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown