Why isn't an infinite direct product of copies of $Bbb Z$ a free module?












24















Why isn't an infinite direct product of copies of $Bbb Z$ a free module?




Actually I was asked to show that it's not projective, but as $Bbb{Z}$ is a PID, so it suffices to show it's not free.



I am stuck here. I saw some questions in SE, but there is no satisfactory answer at all.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Have you in mind the (infinite) complete product of Z's?
    – Boris Novikov
    Mar 4 '13 at 14:21


















24















Why isn't an infinite direct product of copies of $Bbb Z$ a free module?




Actually I was asked to show that it's not projective, but as $Bbb{Z}$ is a PID, so it suffices to show it's not free.



I am stuck here. I saw some questions in SE, but there is no satisfactory answer at all.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Have you in mind the (infinite) complete product of Z's?
    – Boris Novikov
    Mar 4 '13 at 14:21
















24












24








24


24






Why isn't an infinite direct product of copies of $Bbb Z$ a free module?




Actually I was asked to show that it's not projective, but as $Bbb{Z}$ is a PID, so it suffices to show it's not free.



I am stuck here. I saw some questions in SE, but there is no satisfactory answer at all.










share|cite|improve this question
















Why isn't an infinite direct product of copies of $Bbb Z$ a free module?




Actually I was asked to show that it's not projective, but as $Bbb{Z}$ is a PID, so it suffices to show it's not free.



I am stuck here. I saw some questions in SE, but there is no satisfactory answer at all.







abstract-algebra modules projective-module






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 28 '13 at 9:49







user26857

















asked Mar 4 '13 at 14:08









lee

1,4391023




1,4391023








  • 1




    Have you in mind the (infinite) complete product of Z's?
    – Boris Novikov
    Mar 4 '13 at 14:21
















  • 1




    Have you in mind the (infinite) complete product of Z's?
    – Boris Novikov
    Mar 4 '13 at 14:21










1




1




Have you in mind the (infinite) complete product of Z's?
– Boris Novikov
Mar 4 '13 at 14:21






Have you in mind the (infinite) complete product of Z's?
– Boris Novikov
Mar 4 '13 at 14:21












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















25














This failure of freeness is a non-trivial result. One way to prove it is to begin with a lemma: If $F$ is a free abelian group and $C$ is a countable subgroup, then the quotient $F/C$ is the direct sum of a countable group and a free group. (I'm omitting "abelian" because I'm lazy and all groups here will be abelian.) [Proof of lemma: Fix a basis $B$ for $F$, let $B_0$ be the countable subset consisting of the basis elements that occur when you expand elements of $C$ in terms of your basis $B$. Then $F$ is the direct sum of $F_0$ freely generated by $B_0$ and $F_1$ freely generated by $B-B_0$. As $Csubseteq F_0$, it follows that $F/C$ is the direct sum of the countable group $F_0/C$ and the free group $F_1$.]



As a corollary, under the hypotheses of the lemma, any divisible subgroup of $F/C$ must be included in the countable summand and must therefore be countable.



Now suppose the direct product $P$ of countably infinitely many copies of $mathbb Z$ were free. The elements of $P$ are the all of the infinite sequences of integers. Let $C$ be the subgroup of $P$ consisting of those sequences that have non-zero entries in only finitely many positions. Then $C$ is countable, so the divisible part of $P/C$ would have to be countable. But this divisible part contains the cosets (in $P/C$) of all the sequences (in $P$) of the form $nmapsto n!cdot a_n$ for arbitrary sequences of integers $(a_n)$. So the divisible part of $P/C$ has the cardinality of the continuum. This contradiction shows that $P$ is not free.



If your question was not only about $P$ but also about products of uncountably many copies of $mathbb Z$, notice that such a product contains a copy of $P$, so you're done if you know that subgroups of free (abelian) groups are free. If you don't know that, just re-run the argument in the preceding paragraph within a copy of $P$ inside your bigger product.



By the way, a theorem of Specker shows that $P$ is not only not free but very far from free. Since $P$ has cardinality $2^{aleph_0}$, if it were free any basis for it would also have cardinality $2^{aleph_0}$, so there would be $2^{2^{aleph_0}}$ homomorphisms from $P$ to $mathbb Z$ (because you could choose the images of the $2^{aleph_0}$ basis elements arbitrarily). Specker showed that there are only countably many homomorphisms $Ptomathbb Z$, namely the $mathbb Z$-linear combinations of the projections.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Yes, I also started to think about the possible homomorphisms $PtoBbb Z$ to conclude that they are too few..
    – Berci
    Mar 4 '13 at 14:40






  • 1




    what is a divisible subgroup?
    – lee
    Mar 5 '13 at 15:06










  • An abelian group $G$ is divisible if, for every $gin G$ and every positive integer $n$, there is $hin G$ such that $nh$ (meaning the sum of $n$ copies of $h$) equals $g$.
    – Andreas Blass
    Mar 8 '13 at 22:17











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f320444%2fwhy-isnt-an-infinite-direct-product-of-copies-of-bbb-z-a-free-module%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









25














This failure of freeness is a non-trivial result. One way to prove it is to begin with a lemma: If $F$ is a free abelian group and $C$ is a countable subgroup, then the quotient $F/C$ is the direct sum of a countable group and a free group. (I'm omitting "abelian" because I'm lazy and all groups here will be abelian.) [Proof of lemma: Fix a basis $B$ for $F$, let $B_0$ be the countable subset consisting of the basis elements that occur when you expand elements of $C$ in terms of your basis $B$. Then $F$ is the direct sum of $F_0$ freely generated by $B_0$ and $F_1$ freely generated by $B-B_0$. As $Csubseteq F_0$, it follows that $F/C$ is the direct sum of the countable group $F_0/C$ and the free group $F_1$.]



As a corollary, under the hypotheses of the lemma, any divisible subgroup of $F/C$ must be included in the countable summand and must therefore be countable.



Now suppose the direct product $P$ of countably infinitely many copies of $mathbb Z$ were free. The elements of $P$ are the all of the infinite sequences of integers. Let $C$ be the subgroup of $P$ consisting of those sequences that have non-zero entries in only finitely many positions. Then $C$ is countable, so the divisible part of $P/C$ would have to be countable. But this divisible part contains the cosets (in $P/C$) of all the sequences (in $P$) of the form $nmapsto n!cdot a_n$ for arbitrary sequences of integers $(a_n)$. So the divisible part of $P/C$ has the cardinality of the continuum. This contradiction shows that $P$ is not free.



If your question was not only about $P$ but also about products of uncountably many copies of $mathbb Z$, notice that such a product contains a copy of $P$, so you're done if you know that subgroups of free (abelian) groups are free. If you don't know that, just re-run the argument in the preceding paragraph within a copy of $P$ inside your bigger product.



By the way, a theorem of Specker shows that $P$ is not only not free but very far from free. Since $P$ has cardinality $2^{aleph_0}$, if it were free any basis for it would also have cardinality $2^{aleph_0}$, so there would be $2^{2^{aleph_0}}$ homomorphisms from $P$ to $mathbb Z$ (because you could choose the images of the $2^{aleph_0}$ basis elements arbitrarily). Specker showed that there are only countably many homomorphisms $Ptomathbb Z$, namely the $mathbb Z$-linear combinations of the projections.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Yes, I also started to think about the possible homomorphisms $PtoBbb Z$ to conclude that they are too few..
    – Berci
    Mar 4 '13 at 14:40






  • 1




    what is a divisible subgroup?
    – lee
    Mar 5 '13 at 15:06










  • An abelian group $G$ is divisible if, for every $gin G$ and every positive integer $n$, there is $hin G$ such that $nh$ (meaning the sum of $n$ copies of $h$) equals $g$.
    – Andreas Blass
    Mar 8 '13 at 22:17
















25














This failure of freeness is a non-trivial result. One way to prove it is to begin with a lemma: If $F$ is a free abelian group and $C$ is a countable subgroup, then the quotient $F/C$ is the direct sum of a countable group and a free group. (I'm omitting "abelian" because I'm lazy and all groups here will be abelian.) [Proof of lemma: Fix a basis $B$ for $F$, let $B_0$ be the countable subset consisting of the basis elements that occur when you expand elements of $C$ in terms of your basis $B$. Then $F$ is the direct sum of $F_0$ freely generated by $B_0$ and $F_1$ freely generated by $B-B_0$. As $Csubseteq F_0$, it follows that $F/C$ is the direct sum of the countable group $F_0/C$ and the free group $F_1$.]



As a corollary, under the hypotheses of the lemma, any divisible subgroup of $F/C$ must be included in the countable summand and must therefore be countable.



Now suppose the direct product $P$ of countably infinitely many copies of $mathbb Z$ were free. The elements of $P$ are the all of the infinite sequences of integers. Let $C$ be the subgroup of $P$ consisting of those sequences that have non-zero entries in only finitely many positions. Then $C$ is countable, so the divisible part of $P/C$ would have to be countable. But this divisible part contains the cosets (in $P/C$) of all the sequences (in $P$) of the form $nmapsto n!cdot a_n$ for arbitrary sequences of integers $(a_n)$. So the divisible part of $P/C$ has the cardinality of the continuum. This contradiction shows that $P$ is not free.



If your question was not only about $P$ but also about products of uncountably many copies of $mathbb Z$, notice that such a product contains a copy of $P$, so you're done if you know that subgroups of free (abelian) groups are free. If you don't know that, just re-run the argument in the preceding paragraph within a copy of $P$ inside your bigger product.



By the way, a theorem of Specker shows that $P$ is not only not free but very far from free. Since $P$ has cardinality $2^{aleph_0}$, if it were free any basis for it would also have cardinality $2^{aleph_0}$, so there would be $2^{2^{aleph_0}}$ homomorphisms from $P$ to $mathbb Z$ (because you could choose the images of the $2^{aleph_0}$ basis elements arbitrarily). Specker showed that there are only countably many homomorphisms $Ptomathbb Z$, namely the $mathbb Z$-linear combinations of the projections.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Yes, I also started to think about the possible homomorphisms $PtoBbb Z$ to conclude that they are too few..
    – Berci
    Mar 4 '13 at 14:40






  • 1




    what is a divisible subgroup?
    – lee
    Mar 5 '13 at 15:06










  • An abelian group $G$ is divisible if, for every $gin G$ and every positive integer $n$, there is $hin G$ such that $nh$ (meaning the sum of $n$ copies of $h$) equals $g$.
    – Andreas Blass
    Mar 8 '13 at 22:17














25












25








25






This failure of freeness is a non-trivial result. One way to prove it is to begin with a lemma: If $F$ is a free abelian group and $C$ is a countable subgroup, then the quotient $F/C$ is the direct sum of a countable group and a free group. (I'm omitting "abelian" because I'm lazy and all groups here will be abelian.) [Proof of lemma: Fix a basis $B$ for $F$, let $B_0$ be the countable subset consisting of the basis elements that occur when you expand elements of $C$ in terms of your basis $B$. Then $F$ is the direct sum of $F_0$ freely generated by $B_0$ and $F_1$ freely generated by $B-B_0$. As $Csubseteq F_0$, it follows that $F/C$ is the direct sum of the countable group $F_0/C$ and the free group $F_1$.]



As a corollary, under the hypotheses of the lemma, any divisible subgroup of $F/C$ must be included in the countable summand and must therefore be countable.



Now suppose the direct product $P$ of countably infinitely many copies of $mathbb Z$ were free. The elements of $P$ are the all of the infinite sequences of integers. Let $C$ be the subgroup of $P$ consisting of those sequences that have non-zero entries in only finitely many positions. Then $C$ is countable, so the divisible part of $P/C$ would have to be countable. But this divisible part contains the cosets (in $P/C$) of all the sequences (in $P$) of the form $nmapsto n!cdot a_n$ for arbitrary sequences of integers $(a_n)$. So the divisible part of $P/C$ has the cardinality of the continuum. This contradiction shows that $P$ is not free.



If your question was not only about $P$ but also about products of uncountably many copies of $mathbb Z$, notice that such a product contains a copy of $P$, so you're done if you know that subgroups of free (abelian) groups are free. If you don't know that, just re-run the argument in the preceding paragraph within a copy of $P$ inside your bigger product.



By the way, a theorem of Specker shows that $P$ is not only not free but very far from free. Since $P$ has cardinality $2^{aleph_0}$, if it were free any basis for it would also have cardinality $2^{aleph_0}$, so there would be $2^{2^{aleph_0}}$ homomorphisms from $P$ to $mathbb Z$ (because you could choose the images of the $2^{aleph_0}$ basis elements arbitrarily). Specker showed that there are only countably many homomorphisms $Ptomathbb Z$, namely the $mathbb Z$-linear combinations of the projections.






share|cite|improve this answer












This failure of freeness is a non-trivial result. One way to prove it is to begin with a lemma: If $F$ is a free abelian group and $C$ is a countable subgroup, then the quotient $F/C$ is the direct sum of a countable group and a free group. (I'm omitting "abelian" because I'm lazy and all groups here will be abelian.) [Proof of lemma: Fix a basis $B$ for $F$, let $B_0$ be the countable subset consisting of the basis elements that occur when you expand elements of $C$ in terms of your basis $B$. Then $F$ is the direct sum of $F_0$ freely generated by $B_0$ and $F_1$ freely generated by $B-B_0$. As $Csubseteq F_0$, it follows that $F/C$ is the direct sum of the countable group $F_0/C$ and the free group $F_1$.]



As a corollary, under the hypotheses of the lemma, any divisible subgroup of $F/C$ must be included in the countable summand and must therefore be countable.



Now suppose the direct product $P$ of countably infinitely many copies of $mathbb Z$ were free. The elements of $P$ are the all of the infinite sequences of integers. Let $C$ be the subgroup of $P$ consisting of those sequences that have non-zero entries in only finitely many positions. Then $C$ is countable, so the divisible part of $P/C$ would have to be countable. But this divisible part contains the cosets (in $P/C$) of all the sequences (in $P$) of the form $nmapsto n!cdot a_n$ for arbitrary sequences of integers $(a_n)$. So the divisible part of $P/C$ has the cardinality of the continuum. This contradiction shows that $P$ is not free.



If your question was not only about $P$ but also about products of uncountably many copies of $mathbb Z$, notice that such a product contains a copy of $P$, so you're done if you know that subgroups of free (abelian) groups are free. If you don't know that, just re-run the argument in the preceding paragraph within a copy of $P$ inside your bigger product.



By the way, a theorem of Specker shows that $P$ is not only not free but very far from free. Since $P$ has cardinality $2^{aleph_0}$, if it were free any basis for it would also have cardinality $2^{aleph_0}$, so there would be $2^{2^{aleph_0}}$ homomorphisms from $P$ to $mathbb Z$ (because you could choose the images of the $2^{aleph_0}$ basis elements arbitrarily). Specker showed that there are only countably many homomorphisms $Ptomathbb Z$, namely the $mathbb Z$-linear combinations of the projections.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 4 '13 at 14:33









Andreas Blass

49.3k351108




49.3k351108












  • Yes, I also started to think about the possible homomorphisms $PtoBbb Z$ to conclude that they are too few..
    – Berci
    Mar 4 '13 at 14:40






  • 1




    what is a divisible subgroup?
    – lee
    Mar 5 '13 at 15:06










  • An abelian group $G$ is divisible if, for every $gin G$ and every positive integer $n$, there is $hin G$ such that $nh$ (meaning the sum of $n$ copies of $h$) equals $g$.
    – Andreas Blass
    Mar 8 '13 at 22:17


















  • Yes, I also started to think about the possible homomorphisms $PtoBbb Z$ to conclude that they are too few..
    – Berci
    Mar 4 '13 at 14:40






  • 1




    what is a divisible subgroup?
    – lee
    Mar 5 '13 at 15:06










  • An abelian group $G$ is divisible if, for every $gin G$ and every positive integer $n$, there is $hin G$ such that $nh$ (meaning the sum of $n$ copies of $h$) equals $g$.
    – Andreas Blass
    Mar 8 '13 at 22:17
















Yes, I also started to think about the possible homomorphisms $PtoBbb Z$ to conclude that they are too few..
– Berci
Mar 4 '13 at 14:40




Yes, I also started to think about the possible homomorphisms $PtoBbb Z$ to conclude that they are too few..
– Berci
Mar 4 '13 at 14:40




1




1




what is a divisible subgroup?
– lee
Mar 5 '13 at 15:06




what is a divisible subgroup?
– lee
Mar 5 '13 at 15:06












An abelian group $G$ is divisible if, for every $gin G$ and every positive integer $n$, there is $hin G$ such that $nh$ (meaning the sum of $n$ copies of $h$) equals $g$.
– Andreas Blass
Mar 8 '13 at 22:17




An abelian group $G$ is divisible if, for every $gin G$ and every positive integer $n$, there is $hin G$ such that $nh$ (meaning the sum of $n$ copies of $h$) equals $g$.
– Andreas Blass
Mar 8 '13 at 22:17


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f320444%2fwhy-isnt-an-infinite-direct-product-of-copies-of-bbb-z-a-free-module%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bundesstraße 106

Verónica Boquete

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten