Equivalencity of $xI-A$












2












$begingroup$


Let $A$ and $B$ be two matrices over $mathbb Q[x]$. What is the relation be the the conditions that (1) $det(xI-A) = det (xI-B)$ and that (2) $A$ and $B$ are equivalent, that is, there exists invertible matrices $P$ and $Q$ over $mathbb Q[x]$ such that $A = PBQ$.



Do these two conditions imply each other? If so, what is a proof? If one does not imply the other, why not?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    This looks interesting, but it would be nice if you could add some context to your question. For example, what you think of the problem, how you've encountered it, what you've tried, where you got stuck...
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud D.
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:36










  • $begingroup$
    What do you know about equivalent matrices? For example, can you see that two matrices are equivalent if and only if they have the same rank?
    $endgroup$
    – Zach Langley
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:42










  • $begingroup$
    @ZachLangley Are you sure that this would still be true for matrices over $mathbb{Q}[x]$ (which is not a field)?
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud D.
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:45










  • $begingroup$
    @ArnaudD. Ah, no. I am not.
    $endgroup$
    – Zach Langley
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:53










  • $begingroup$
    Similarity implies same rank but the other implication is true in general?
    $endgroup$
    – orange
    Dec 14 '18 at 17:34
















2












$begingroup$


Let $A$ and $B$ be two matrices over $mathbb Q[x]$. What is the relation be the the conditions that (1) $det(xI-A) = det (xI-B)$ and that (2) $A$ and $B$ are equivalent, that is, there exists invertible matrices $P$ and $Q$ over $mathbb Q[x]$ such that $A = PBQ$.



Do these two conditions imply each other? If so, what is a proof? If one does not imply the other, why not?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    This looks interesting, but it would be nice if you could add some context to your question. For example, what you think of the problem, how you've encountered it, what you've tried, where you got stuck...
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud D.
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:36










  • $begingroup$
    What do you know about equivalent matrices? For example, can you see that two matrices are equivalent if and only if they have the same rank?
    $endgroup$
    – Zach Langley
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:42










  • $begingroup$
    @ZachLangley Are you sure that this would still be true for matrices over $mathbb{Q}[x]$ (which is not a field)?
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud D.
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:45










  • $begingroup$
    @ArnaudD. Ah, no. I am not.
    $endgroup$
    – Zach Langley
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:53










  • $begingroup$
    Similarity implies same rank but the other implication is true in general?
    $endgroup$
    – orange
    Dec 14 '18 at 17:34














2












2








2


3



$begingroup$


Let $A$ and $B$ be two matrices over $mathbb Q[x]$. What is the relation be the the conditions that (1) $det(xI-A) = det (xI-B)$ and that (2) $A$ and $B$ are equivalent, that is, there exists invertible matrices $P$ and $Q$ over $mathbb Q[x]$ such that $A = PBQ$.



Do these two conditions imply each other? If so, what is a proof? If one does not imply the other, why not?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $A$ and $B$ be two matrices over $mathbb Q[x]$. What is the relation be the the conditions that (1) $det(xI-A) = det (xI-B)$ and that (2) $A$ and $B$ are equivalent, that is, there exists invertible matrices $P$ and $Q$ over $mathbb Q[x]$ such that $A = PBQ$.



Do these two conditions imply each other? If so, what is a proof? If one does not imply the other, why not?







linear-algebra abstract-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 14 '18 at 17:52







LinearGuy

















asked Dec 14 '18 at 16:30









LinearGuyLinearGuy

1511




1511












  • $begingroup$
    This looks interesting, but it would be nice if you could add some context to your question. For example, what you think of the problem, how you've encountered it, what you've tried, where you got stuck...
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud D.
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:36










  • $begingroup$
    What do you know about equivalent matrices? For example, can you see that two matrices are equivalent if and only if they have the same rank?
    $endgroup$
    – Zach Langley
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:42










  • $begingroup$
    @ZachLangley Are you sure that this would still be true for matrices over $mathbb{Q}[x]$ (which is not a field)?
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud D.
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:45










  • $begingroup$
    @ArnaudD. Ah, no. I am not.
    $endgroup$
    – Zach Langley
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:53










  • $begingroup$
    Similarity implies same rank but the other implication is true in general?
    $endgroup$
    – orange
    Dec 14 '18 at 17:34


















  • $begingroup$
    This looks interesting, but it would be nice if you could add some context to your question. For example, what you think of the problem, how you've encountered it, what you've tried, where you got stuck...
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud D.
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:36










  • $begingroup$
    What do you know about equivalent matrices? For example, can you see that two matrices are equivalent if and only if they have the same rank?
    $endgroup$
    – Zach Langley
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:42










  • $begingroup$
    @ZachLangley Are you sure that this would still be true for matrices over $mathbb{Q}[x]$ (which is not a field)?
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud D.
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:45










  • $begingroup$
    @ArnaudD. Ah, no. I am not.
    $endgroup$
    – Zach Langley
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:53










  • $begingroup$
    Similarity implies same rank but the other implication is true in general?
    $endgroup$
    – orange
    Dec 14 '18 at 17:34
















$begingroup$
This looks interesting, but it would be nice if you could add some context to your question. For example, what you think of the problem, how you've encountered it, what you've tried, where you got stuck...
$endgroup$
– Arnaud D.
Dec 14 '18 at 16:36




$begingroup$
This looks interesting, but it would be nice if you could add some context to your question. For example, what you think of the problem, how you've encountered it, what you've tried, where you got stuck...
$endgroup$
– Arnaud D.
Dec 14 '18 at 16:36












$begingroup$
What do you know about equivalent matrices? For example, can you see that two matrices are equivalent if and only if they have the same rank?
$endgroup$
– Zach Langley
Dec 14 '18 at 16:42




$begingroup$
What do you know about equivalent matrices? For example, can you see that two matrices are equivalent if and only if they have the same rank?
$endgroup$
– Zach Langley
Dec 14 '18 at 16:42












$begingroup$
@ZachLangley Are you sure that this would still be true for matrices over $mathbb{Q}[x]$ (which is not a field)?
$endgroup$
– Arnaud D.
Dec 14 '18 at 16:45




$begingroup$
@ZachLangley Are you sure that this would still be true for matrices over $mathbb{Q}[x]$ (which is not a field)?
$endgroup$
– Arnaud D.
Dec 14 '18 at 16:45












$begingroup$
@ArnaudD. Ah, no. I am not.
$endgroup$
– Zach Langley
Dec 14 '18 at 16:53




$begingroup$
@ArnaudD. Ah, no. I am not.
$endgroup$
– Zach Langley
Dec 14 '18 at 16:53












$begingroup$
Similarity implies same rank but the other implication is true in general?
$endgroup$
– orange
Dec 14 '18 at 17:34




$begingroup$
Similarity implies same rank but the other implication is true in general?
$endgroup$
– orange
Dec 14 '18 at 17:34










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

No relations.



Example 1. Let $A=begin{pmatrix} 0 &0 \ 0 & 0end{pmatrix}$ and
$B=begin{pmatrix} 0 &1 \ 0 & 0end{pmatrix}$ They have the same characteristic polynomial ($det(Ix-A)=det(Ix-B)=x^2$) but the only matrix equivalent to $A$ is $A$ itself.





Example 2.
Let $A=begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 \ 0 & 1end{pmatrix}$ and
$B=begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 \ 0 & 2end{pmatrix}$
They have different characteristic polynomials but
if $P=begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 \ 0 & 1end{pmatrix}$ and
$Q=begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 \ 0 & 1/2end{pmatrix}$
then $PBQ=A$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    None of the condition implies the other.
    Take B to be the $0$ matrix and A to be the $0$ matrix with a nonzero element in the upper right corner. det(A-xI)=det(B-xI) but there are no invertible matrices P and Q as you require.



    For the second condition to imply the first any two invertible matrices would have to have the same characteristic poly which is absurd






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039583%2fequivalencity-of-xi-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      No relations.



      Example 1. Let $A=begin{pmatrix} 0 &0 \ 0 & 0end{pmatrix}$ and
      $B=begin{pmatrix} 0 &1 \ 0 & 0end{pmatrix}$ They have the same characteristic polynomial ($det(Ix-A)=det(Ix-B)=x^2$) but the only matrix equivalent to $A$ is $A$ itself.





      Example 2.
      Let $A=begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 \ 0 & 1end{pmatrix}$ and
      $B=begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 \ 0 & 2end{pmatrix}$
      They have different characteristic polynomials but
      if $P=begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 \ 0 & 1end{pmatrix}$ and
      $Q=begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 \ 0 & 1/2end{pmatrix}$
      then $PBQ=A$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        1












        $begingroup$

        No relations.



        Example 1. Let $A=begin{pmatrix} 0 &0 \ 0 & 0end{pmatrix}$ and
        $B=begin{pmatrix} 0 &1 \ 0 & 0end{pmatrix}$ They have the same characteristic polynomial ($det(Ix-A)=det(Ix-B)=x^2$) but the only matrix equivalent to $A$ is $A$ itself.





        Example 2.
        Let $A=begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 \ 0 & 1end{pmatrix}$ and
        $B=begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 \ 0 & 2end{pmatrix}$
        They have different characteristic polynomials but
        if $P=begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 \ 0 & 1end{pmatrix}$ and
        $Q=begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 \ 0 & 1/2end{pmatrix}$
        then $PBQ=A$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          No relations.



          Example 1. Let $A=begin{pmatrix} 0 &0 \ 0 & 0end{pmatrix}$ and
          $B=begin{pmatrix} 0 &1 \ 0 & 0end{pmatrix}$ They have the same characteristic polynomial ($det(Ix-A)=det(Ix-B)=x^2$) but the only matrix equivalent to $A$ is $A$ itself.





          Example 2.
          Let $A=begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 \ 0 & 1end{pmatrix}$ and
          $B=begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 \ 0 & 2end{pmatrix}$
          They have different characteristic polynomials but
          if $P=begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 \ 0 & 1end{pmatrix}$ and
          $Q=begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 \ 0 & 1/2end{pmatrix}$
          then $PBQ=A$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          No relations.



          Example 1. Let $A=begin{pmatrix} 0 &0 \ 0 & 0end{pmatrix}$ and
          $B=begin{pmatrix} 0 &1 \ 0 & 0end{pmatrix}$ They have the same characteristic polynomial ($det(Ix-A)=det(Ix-B)=x^2$) but the only matrix equivalent to $A$ is $A$ itself.





          Example 2.
          Let $A=begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 \ 0 & 1end{pmatrix}$ and
          $B=begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 \ 0 & 2end{pmatrix}$
          They have different characteristic polynomials but
          if $P=begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 \ 0 & 1end{pmatrix}$ and
          $Q=begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 \ 0 & 1/2end{pmatrix}$
          then $PBQ=A$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 14 '18 at 18:04









          user126154user126154

          5,376816




          5,376816























              0












              $begingroup$

              None of the condition implies the other.
              Take B to be the $0$ matrix and A to be the $0$ matrix with a nonzero element in the upper right corner. det(A-xI)=det(B-xI) but there are no invertible matrices P and Q as you require.



              For the second condition to imply the first any two invertible matrices would have to have the same characteristic poly which is absurd






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                None of the condition implies the other.
                Take B to be the $0$ matrix and A to be the $0$ matrix with a nonzero element in the upper right corner. det(A-xI)=det(B-xI) but there are no invertible matrices P and Q as you require.



                For the second condition to imply the first any two invertible matrices would have to have the same characteristic poly which is absurd






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  None of the condition implies the other.
                  Take B to be the $0$ matrix and A to be the $0$ matrix with a nonzero element in the upper right corner. det(A-xI)=det(B-xI) but there are no invertible matrices P and Q as you require.



                  For the second condition to imply the first any two invertible matrices would have to have the same characteristic poly which is absurd






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  None of the condition implies the other.
                  Take B to be the $0$ matrix and A to be the $0$ matrix with a nonzero element in the upper right corner. det(A-xI)=det(B-xI) but there are no invertible matrices P and Q as you require.



                  For the second condition to imply the first any two invertible matrices would have to have the same characteristic poly which is absurd







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 14 '18 at 18:08









                  Sorin TircSorin Tirc

                  1,810213




                  1,810213






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039583%2fequivalencity-of-xi-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Bundesstraße 106

                      Verónica Boquete

                      Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten