show that $inf{1-|frac 12(x+y)|: x,yin S_X,|x-y|=epsilon}=inf{1-|frac 12(x+y)|: x,yin B_X,|x-y|=epsilon}$
$begingroup$
Here is theorem 5.2.5 in the book Introduction to Banach Space Theory by Megginson:
Let $X$ be a nored space that is not zero-dimensional if the scalar field is $mathbb C$ and is neither zero- nor one-dimensional if scalar field is $mathbb R$. Let $delta_1,delta_2:[0,2]to [0,1]$ defined by
$$delta_1(epsilon)=inf{1-|frac 12(x+y)|: x,yin S_X,|x-y|=epsilon}\
delta_2(epsilon)=inf{1-|frac 12(x+y)|: x,yin B_X,|x-y|=epsilon}\
$$
Show that $delta_1=delta_2$.
Notation: $B_X$ and $S_X$ are respectively the closed unit ball and unit sphere.
proof of this theorem based on the following lemma:
Let $X$ be a nored space that is not zero-dimensional if the scalar field is $mathbb C$ and is neither zero- nor one-dimensional if scalar field is $mathbb R$. If $x_0in S_X$ and $y_0in B_X$, then there are members $x_1,y_1in S_X$ such that $x_1-y_1=x_0-y_0$ and $|frac12(x_1+y_1)|geq |frac 12(x_0+y_0)|$.
It's clear that $delta_2leq delta_1, $However I dont understand the first part(the following paragraph) of the proof:
suppose that $0<epsilonleq 2$, that $x_0,y_0in B_X$ and that $|x_0-y_0|=epsilon$. to prove the claim it sufices to show that $delta_1(epsilon)leq 1-|frac12(x_0+y_0)|$. Suppose for the moment that $x_0,y_0$ have norm less than one. then there are two closed line segment of length $epsilon$ on the line through $x_0$ and $y_0$ such that each segment has one endpoint in $S_X$ and the other in $B_X^circ$. since $frac12(x_0+y_0)$ is a convex combination of the midpoints of these two segment, the midpoint of at least one of these two segments has norm at least $|frac12(x_0+y_0)|$, so it may be assumed that $x_0in S_X$.
The rest of the proof is easy by using the lemma.
why it may be assumed $x_0in S_X$?
real-analysis functional-analysis analysis proof-explanation normed-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is theorem 5.2.5 in the book Introduction to Banach Space Theory by Megginson:
Let $X$ be a nored space that is not zero-dimensional if the scalar field is $mathbb C$ and is neither zero- nor one-dimensional if scalar field is $mathbb R$. Let $delta_1,delta_2:[0,2]to [0,1]$ defined by
$$delta_1(epsilon)=inf{1-|frac 12(x+y)|: x,yin S_X,|x-y|=epsilon}\
delta_2(epsilon)=inf{1-|frac 12(x+y)|: x,yin B_X,|x-y|=epsilon}\
$$
Show that $delta_1=delta_2$.
Notation: $B_X$ and $S_X$ are respectively the closed unit ball and unit sphere.
proof of this theorem based on the following lemma:
Let $X$ be a nored space that is not zero-dimensional if the scalar field is $mathbb C$ and is neither zero- nor one-dimensional if scalar field is $mathbb R$. If $x_0in S_X$ and $y_0in B_X$, then there are members $x_1,y_1in S_X$ such that $x_1-y_1=x_0-y_0$ and $|frac12(x_1+y_1)|geq |frac 12(x_0+y_0)|$.
It's clear that $delta_2leq delta_1, $However I dont understand the first part(the following paragraph) of the proof:
suppose that $0<epsilonleq 2$, that $x_0,y_0in B_X$ and that $|x_0-y_0|=epsilon$. to prove the claim it sufices to show that $delta_1(epsilon)leq 1-|frac12(x_0+y_0)|$. Suppose for the moment that $x_0,y_0$ have norm less than one. then there are two closed line segment of length $epsilon$ on the line through $x_0$ and $y_0$ such that each segment has one endpoint in $S_X$ and the other in $B_X^circ$. since $frac12(x_0+y_0)$ is a convex combination of the midpoints of these two segment, the midpoint of at least one of these two segments has norm at least $|frac12(x_0+y_0)|$, so it may be assumed that $x_0in S_X$.
The rest of the proof is easy by using the lemma.
why it may be assumed $x_0in S_X$?
real-analysis functional-analysis analysis proof-explanation normed-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is theorem 5.2.5 in the book Introduction to Banach Space Theory by Megginson:
Let $X$ be a nored space that is not zero-dimensional if the scalar field is $mathbb C$ and is neither zero- nor one-dimensional if scalar field is $mathbb R$. Let $delta_1,delta_2:[0,2]to [0,1]$ defined by
$$delta_1(epsilon)=inf{1-|frac 12(x+y)|: x,yin S_X,|x-y|=epsilon}\
delta_2(epsilon)=inf{1-|frac 12(x+y)|: x,yin B_X,|x-y|=epsilon}\
$$
Show that $delta_1=delta_2$.
Notation: $B_X$ and $S_X$ are respectively the closed unit ball and unit sphere.
proof of this theorem based on the following lemma:
Let $X$ be a nored space that is not zero-dimensional if the scalar field is $mathbb C$ and is neither zero- nor one-dimensional if scalar field is $mathbb R$. If $x_0in S_X$ and $y_0in B_X$, then there are members $x_1,y_1in S_X$ such that $x_1-y_1=x_0-y_0$ and $|frac12(x_1+y_1)|geq |frac 12(x_0+y_0)|$.
It's clear that $delta_2leq delta_1, $However I dont understand the first part(the following paragraph) of the proof:
suppose that $0<epsilonleq 2$, that $x_0,y_0in B_X$ and that $|x_0-y_0|=epsilon$. to prove the claim it sufices to show that $delta_1(epsilon)leq 1-|frac12(x_0+y_0)|$. Suppose for the moment that $x_0,y_0$ have norm less than one. then there are two closed line segment of length $epsilon$ on the line through $x_0$ and $y_0$ such that each segment has one endpoint in $S_X$ and the other in $B_X^circ$. since $frac12(x_0+y_0)$ is a convex combination of the midpoints of these two segment, the midpoint of at least one of these two segments has norm at least $|frac12(x_0+y_0)|$, so it may be assumed that $x_0in S_X$.
The rest of the proof is easy by using the lemma.
why it may be assumed $x_0in S_X$?
real-analysis functional-analysis analysis proof-explanation normed-spaces
$endgroup$
Here is theorem 5.2.5 in the book Introduction to Banach Space Theory by Megginson:
Let $X$ be a nored space that is not zero-dimensional if the scalar field is $mathbb C$ and is neither zero- nor one-dimensional if scalar field is $mathbb R$. Let $delta_1,delta_2:[0,2]to [0,1]$ defined by
$$delta_1(epsilon)=inf{1-|frac 12(x+y)|: x,yin S_X,|x-y|=epsilon}\
delta_2(epsilon)=inf{1-|frac 12(x+y)|: x,yin B_X,|x-y|=epsilon}\
$$
Show that $delta_1=delta_2$.
Notation: $B_X$ and $S_X$ are respectively the closed unit ball and unit sphere.
proof of this theorem based on the following lemma:
Let $X$ be a nored space that is not zero-dimensional if the scalar field is $mathbb C$ and is neither zero- nor one-dimensional if scalar field is $mathbb R$. If $x_0in S_X$ and $y_0in B_X$, then there are members $x_1,y_1in S_X$ such that $x_1-y_1=x_0-y_0$ and $|frac12(x_1+y_1)|geq |frac 12(x_0+y_0)|$.
It's clear that $delta_2leq delta_1, $However I dont understand the first part(the following paragraph) of the proof:
suppose that $0<epsilonleq 2$, that $x_0,y_0in B_X$ and that $|x_0-y_0|=epsilon$. to prove the claim it sufices to show that $delta_1(epsilon)leq 1-|frac12(x_0+y_0)|$. Suppose for the moment that $x_0,y_0$ have norm less than one. then there are two closed line segment of length $epsilon$ on the line through $x_0$ and $y_0$ such that each segment has one endpoint in $S_X$ and the other in $B_X^circ$. since $frac12(x_0+y_0)$ is a convex combination of the midpoints of these two segment, the midpoint of at least one of these two segments has norm at least $|frac12(x_0+y_0)|$, so it may be assumed that $x_0in S_X$.
The rest of the proof is easy by using the lemma.
why it may be assumed $x_0in S_X$?
real-analysis functional-analysis analysis proof-explanation normed-spaces
real-analysis functional-analysis analysis proof-explanation normed-spaces
edited Apr 19 '18 at 14:47
mac
asked Apr 19 '18 at 12:41
macmac
614414
614414
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
why it may be assumed $x_0in S_X$?
Because we just found a segment length $epsilon$ which has one endpoint (denote it by $x’_0$) in $S_X$, the other (denote it by $y’_0$) in $B_X^circ$ such that the norm of its midpoint $|frac12(x’_0+y’_0)|$ is at least $|frac12(x_0+y_0)|$. So we consider $x’_0$ as a new $x_0$ and $y’_0$ as a new $y_0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2744529%2fshow-that-inf-1-frac-12xy-x-y-in-s-x-x-y-epsilon-inf-1-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
why it may be assumed $x_0in S_X$?
Because we just found a segment length $epsilon$ which has one endpoint (denote it by $x’_0$) in $S_X$, the other (denote it by $y’_0$) in $B_X^circ$ such that the norm of its midpoint $|frac12(x’_0+y’_0)|$ is at least $|frac12(x_0+y_0)|$. So we consider $x’_0$ as a new $x_0$ and $y’_0$ as a new $y_0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
why it may be assumed $x_0in S_X$?
Because we just found a segment length $epsilon$ which has one endpoint (denote it by $x’_0$) in $S_X$, the other (denote it by $y’_0$) in $B_X^circ$ such that the norm of its midpoint $|frac12(x’_0+y’_0)|$ is at least $|frac12(x_0+y_0)|$. So we consider $x’_0$ as a new $x_0$ and $y’_0$ as a new $y_0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
why it may be assumed $x_0in S_X$?
Because we just found a segment length $epsilon$ which has one endpoint (denote it by $x’_0$) in $S_X$, the other (denote it by $y’_0$) in $B_X^circ$ such that the norm of its midpoint $|frac12(x’_0+y’_0)|$ is at least $|frac12(x_0+y_0)|$. So we consider $x’_0$ as a new $x_0$ and $y’_0$ as a new $y_0$.
$endgroup$
why it may be assumed $x_0in S_X$?
Because we just found a segment length $epsilon$ which has one endpoint (denote it by $x’_0$) in $S_X$, the other (denote it by $y’_0$) in $B_X^circ$ such that the norm of its midpoint $|frac12(x’_0+y’_0)|$ is at least $|frac12(x_0+y_0)|$. So we consider $x’_0$ as a new $x_0$ and $y’_0$ as a new $y_0$.
answered Dec 14 '18 at 17:00
Alex RavskyAlex Ravsky
42.4k32383
42.4k32383
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2744529%2fshow-that-inf-1-frac-12xy-x-y-in-s-x-x-y-epsilon-inf-1-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown