Is there a difference of sign conventions of Dirac Index between mathematics and physics?
$begingroup$
In section 12.6.2 of Nakahara, on a four dimensional manifold, the index of a twisted Dirac operator is given by
$$mathrm{Ind}(D!!!!/_{A})=frac{-1}{8pi^{2}}int_{M}mathrm{Tr}(Fwedge F)+frac{dim_{mathbb{C}}E}{192pi^{2}}int_{M}mathrm{Tr}(Rwedge R),$$
where $E$ is a vector bundle over $M$, $D!!!!/_{A}$ is a Dirac operator twisted by the gauge field $A$, $F$ is the assocciated field strength, and $R$ is the Riemann tensor of $M$.
However, in Strongly Correlated Electrons
Gapped Boundary Phases of Topological Insulators via Weak Coupling by
Nathan Seiberg and Edward Witten, their version of index theorem is
$$mathrm{Ind}(D!!!!/_{A})=intleft(frac{Fwedge F}{8pi^{2}}+widehat{A}(R)right),$$
where the sign of the second chern character differs from that in Nakahara.
Is this related with the different conventions of Lie algebra (Hermitian in physics vs. Anti-Hermitian in mathematics) between the two communities?
I also posted this question here.
characteristic-classes convention
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In section 12.6.2 of Nakahara, on a four dimensional manifold, the index of a twisted Dirac operator is given by
$$mathrm{Ind}(D!!!!/_{A})=frac{-1}{8pi^{2}}int_{M}mathrm{Tr}(Fwedge F)+frac{dim_{mathbb{C}}E}{192pi^{2}}int_{M}mathrm{Tr}(Rwedge R),$$
where $E$ is a vector bundle over $M$, $D!!!!/_{A}$ is a Dirac operator twisted by the gauge field $A$, $F$ is the assocciated field strength, and $R$ is the Riemann tensor of $M$.
However, in Strongly Correlated Electrons
Gapped Boundary Phases of Topological Insulators via Weak Coupling by
Nathan Seiberg and Edward Witten, their version of index theorem is
$$mathrm{Ind}(D!!!!/_{A})=intleft(frac{Fwedge F}{8pi^{2}}+widehat{A}(R)right),$$
where the sign of the second chern character differs from that in Nakahara.
Is this related with the different conventions of Lie algebra (Hermitian in physics vs. Anti-Hermitian in mathematics) between the two communities?
I also posted this question here.
characteristic-classes convention
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In section 12.6.2 of Nakahara, on a four dimensional manifold, the index of a twisted Dirac operator is given by
$$mathrm{Ind}(D!!!!/_{A})=frac{-1}{8pi^{2}}int_{M}mathrm{Tr}(Fwedge F)+frac{dim_{mathbb{C}}E}{192pi^{2}}int_{M}mathrm{Tr}(Rwedge R),$$
where $E$ is a vector bundle over $M$, $D!!!!/_{A}$ is a Dirac operator twisted by the gauge field $A$, $F$ is the assocciated field strength, and $R$ is the Riemann tensor of $M$.
However, in Strongly Correlated Electrons
Gapped Boundary Phases of Topological Insulators via Weak Coupling by
Nathan Seiberg and Edward Witten, their version of index theorem is
$$mathrm{Ind}(D!!!!/_{A})=intleft(frac{Fwedge F}{8pi^{2}}+widehat{A}(R)right),$$
where the sign of the second chern character differs from that in Nakahara.
Is this related with the different conventions of Lie algebra (Hermitian in physics vs. Anti-Hermitian in mathematics) between the two communities?
I also posted this question here.
characteristic-classes convention
$endgroup$
In section 12.6.2 of Nakahara, on a four dimensional manifold, the index of a twisted Dirac operator is given by
$$mathrm{Ind}(D!!!!/_{A})=frac{-1}{8pi^{2}}int_{M}mathrm{Tr}(Fwedge F)+frac{dim_{mathbb{C}}E}{192pi^{2}}int_{M}mathrm{Tr}(Rwedge R),$$
where $E$ is a vector bundle over $M$, $D!!!!/_{A}$ is a Dirac operator twisted by the gauge field $A$, $F$ is the assocciated field strength, and $R$ is the Riemann tensor of $M$.
However, in Strongly Correlated Electrons
Gapped Boundary Phases of Topological Insulators via Weak Coupling by
Nathan Seiberg and Edward Witten, their version of index theorem is
$$mathrm{Ind}(D!!!!/_{A})=intleft(frac{Fwedge F}{8pi^{2}}+widehat{A}(R)right),$$
where the sign of the second chern character differs from that in Nakahara.
Is this related with the different conventions of Lie algebra (Hermitian in physics vs. Anti-Hermitian in mathematics) between the two communities?
I also posted this question here.
characteristic-classes convention
characteristic-classes convention
asked Dec 19 '18 at 14:57
The Last Knight of Silk RoadThe Last Knight of Silk Road
1856
1856
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046474%2fis-there-a-difference-of-sign-conventions-of-dirac-index-between-mathematics-and%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046474%2fis-there-a-difference-of-sign-conventions-of-dirac-index-between-mathematics-and%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown