Lie algebra generator relation $T^a T^b propto T^c $ valid for any $a,b$?
$begingroup$
Given a Lie Algebra (such as $su(n), so(n))$ can I always find a set of generators + identity ${T^a}cup {id}$ such that there exists a $c$ for any given $a,b$ such that $T^a T^b = C(a,b) T^c $ for a $a,b$-dependent function $C$ into the real/complex numbers?
lie-algebras
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given a Lie Algebra (such as $su(n), so(n))$ can I always find a set of generators + identity ${T^a}cup {id}$ such that there exists a $c$ for any given $a,b$ such that $T^a T^b = C(a,b) T^c $ for a $a,b$-dependent function $C$ into the real/complex numbers?
lie-algebras
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What does $propto$ stand for.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 19 '18 at 13:44
1
$begingroup$
@JoséCarlosSantos: "proportional to". So OP is asking whether there exist constants $k^{ab}_c$ such that $T^aT^b=k^{ab}_c T^c$ (with no Einstein summation, just a single constant per equation)
$endgroup$
– ziggurism
Dec 19 '18 at 13:51
$begingroup$
are $mathfrak{su}(n)$ or $mathfrak{so}(n)$ even closed under multiplication?
$endgroup$
– ziggurism
Dec 19 '18 at 13:56
$begingroup$
sorry, let's add ${ id }$ to the set of generators
$endgroup$
– tonydo
Dec 19 '18 at 13:58
1
$begingroup$
Why would such identities be of interest? A representation of the Lie algebra need not preserve such product relations, only commutators.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 19 '18 at 17:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given a Lie Algebra (such as $su(n), so(n))$ can I always find a set of generators + identity ${T^a}cup {id}$ such that there exists a $c$ for any given $a,b$ such that $T^a T^b = C(a,b) T^c $ for a $a,b$-dependent function $C$ into the real/complex numbers?
lie-algebras
$endgroup$
Given a Lie Algebra (such as $su(n), so(n))$ can I always find a set of generators + identity ${T^a}cup {id}$ such that there exists a $c$ for any given $a,b$ such that $T^a T^b = C(a,b) T^c $ for a $a,b$-dependent function $C$ into the real/complex numbers?
lie-algebras
lie-algebras
edited Dec 19 '18 at 13:59
tonydo
asked Dec 19 '18 at 13:41
tonydotonydo
1497
1497
$begingroup$
What does $propto$ stand for.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 19 '18 at 13:44
1
$begingroup$
@JoséCarlosSantos: "proportional to". So OP is asking whether there exist constants $k^{ab}_c$ such that $T^aT^b=k^{ab}_c T^c$ (with no Einstein summation, just a single constant per equation)
$endgroup$
– ziggurism
Dec 19 '18 at 13:51
$begingroup$
are $mathfrak{su}(n)$ or $mathfrak{so}(n)$ even closed under multiplication?
$endgroup$
– ziggurism
Dec 19 '18 at 13:56
$begingroup$
sorry, let's add ${ id }$ to the set of generators
$endgroup$
– tonydo
Dec 19 '18 at 13:58
1
$begingroup$
Why would such identities be of interest? A representation of the Lie algebra need not preserve such product relations, only commutators.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 19 '18 at 17:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What does $propto$ stand for.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 19 '18 at 13:44
1
$begingroup$
@JoséCarlosSantos: "proportional to". So OP is asking whether there exist constants $k^{ab}_c$ such that $T^aT^b=k^{ab}_c T^c$ (with no Einstein summation, just a single constant per equation)
$endgroup$
– ziggurism
Dec 19 '18 at 13:51
$begingroup$
are $mathfrak{su}(n)$ or $mathfrak{so}(n)$ even closed under multiplication?
$endgroup$
– ziggurism
Dec 19 '18 at 13:56
$begingroup$
sorry, let's add ${ id }$ to the set of generators
$endgroup$
– tonydo
Dec 19 '18 at 13:58
1
$begingroup$
Why would such identities be of interest? A representation of the Lie algebra need not preserve such product relations, only commutators.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 19 '18 at 17:26
$begingroup$
What does $propto$ stand for.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 19 '18 at 13:44
$begingroup$
What does $propto$ stand for.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 19 '18 at 13:44
1
1
$begingroup$
@JoséCarlosSantos: "proportional to". So OP is asking whether there exist constants $k^{ab}_c$ such that $T^aT^b=k^{ab}_c T^c$ (with no Einstein summation, just a single constant per equation)
$endgroup$
– ziggurism
Dec 19 '18 at 13:51
$begingroup$
@JoséCarlosSantos: "proportional to". So OP is asking whether there exist constants $k^{ab}_c$ such that $T^aT^b=k^{ab}_c T^c$ (with no Einstein summation, just a single constant per equation)
$endgroup$
– ziggurism
Dec 19 '18 at 13:51
$begingroup$
are $mathfrak{su}(n)$ or $mathfrak{so}(n)$ even closed under multiplication?
$endgroup$
– ziggurism
Dec 19 '18 at 13:56
$begingroup$
are $mathfrak{su}(n)$ or $mathfrak{so}(n)$ even closed under multiplication?
$endgroup$
– ziggurism
Dec 19 '18 at 13:56
$begingroup$
sorry, let's add ${ id }$ to the set of generators
$endgroup$
– tonydo
Dec 19 '18 at 13:58
$begingroup$
sorry, let's add ${ id }$ to the set of generators
$endgroup$
– tonydo
Dec 19 '18 at 13:58
1
1
$begingroup$
Why would such identities be of interest? A representation of the Lie algebra need not preserve such product relations, only commutators.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 19 '18 at 17:26
$begingroup$
Why would such identities be of interest? A representation of the Lie algebra need not preserve such product relations, only commutators.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 19 '18 at 17:26
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The answer is a quick no. See this question. Your left-hand-side is in the universal enveloping algebra, not the Lie algebra itself.
You could have spared yourself the question, if you had considered the (presumed) preamble of your text, that surely reminded you of the spin-1, so, adjoint, representation of su(2), namely 3×3 traceless Hermitian matrices, hence a trivial counterexample:
$$
S_z=operatorname {diag} ~ (1,0,-1), qquad Longrightarrow qquad S_z S_z = operatorname {diag} (1,0,1).
$$
Now, this square cannot be written as a linear combination of $S_z$, the identity, which you allowed, and of course $S_x,S_y$ with zero in their diagonals.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046398%2flie-algebra-generator-relation-ta-tb-propto-tc-valid-for-any-a-b%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The answer is a quick no. See this question. Your left-hand-side is in the universal enveloping algebra, not the Lie algebra itself.
You could have spared yourself the question, if you had considered the (presumed) preamble of your text, that surely reminded you of the spin-1, so, adjoint, representation of su(2), namely 3×3 traceless Hermitian matrices, hence a trivial counterexample:
$$
S_z=operatorname {diag} ~ (1,0,-1), qquad Longrightarrow qquad S_z S_z = operatorname {diag} (1,0,1).
$$
Now, this square cannot be written as a linear combination of $S_z$, the identity, which you allowed, and of course $S_x,S_y$ with zero in their diagonals.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer is a quick no. See this question. Your left-hand-side is in the universal enveloping algebra, not the Lie algebra itself.
You could have spared yourself the question, if you had considered the (presumed) preamble of your text, that surely reminded you of the spin-1, so, adjoint, representation of su(2), namely 3×3 traceless Hermitian matrices, hence a trivial counterexample:
$$
S_z=operatorname {diag} ~ (1,0,-1), qquad Longrightarrow qquad S_z S_z = operatorname {diag} (1,0,1).
$$
Now, this square cannot be written as a linear combination of $S_z$, the identity, which you allowed, and of course $S_x,S_y$ with zero in their diagonals.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer is a quick no. See this question. Your left-hand-side is in the universal enveloping algebra, not the Lie algebra itself.
You could have spared yourself the question, if you had considered the (presumed) preamble of your text, that surely reminded you of the spin-1, so, adjoint, representation of su(2), namely 3×3 traceless Hermitian matrices, hence a trivial counterexample:
$$
S_z=operatorname {diag} ~ (1,0,-1), qquad Longrightarrow qquad S_z S_z = operatorname {diag} (1,0,1).
$$
Now, this square cannot be written as a linear combination of $S_z$, the identity, which you allowed, and of course $S_x,S_y$ with zero in their diagonals.
$endgroup$
The answer is a quick no. See this question. Your left-hand-side is in the universal enveloping algebra, not the Lie algebra itself.
You could have spared yourself the question, if you had considered the (presumed) preamble of your text, that surely reminded you of the spin-1, so, adjoint, representation of su(2), namely 3×3 traceless Hermitian matrices, hence a trivial counterexample:
$$
S_z=operatorname {diag} ~ (1,0,-1), qquad Longrightarrow qquad S_z S_z = operatorname {diag} (1,0,1).
$$
Now, this square cannot be written as a linear combination of $S_z$, the identity, which you allowed, and of course $S_x,S_y$ with zero in their diagonals.
edited Dec 20 '18 at 21:15
answered Dec 20 '18 at 15:14
Cosmas ZachosCosmas Zachos
1,810522
1,810522
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046398%2flie-algebra-generator-relation-ta-tb-propto-tc-valid-for-any-a-b%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
What does $propto$ stand for.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 19 '18 at 13:44
1
$begingroup$
@JoséCarlosSantos: "proportional to". So OP is asking whether there exist constants $k^{ab}_c$ such that $T^aT^b=k^{ab}_c T^c$ (with no Einstein summation, just a single constant per equation)
$endgroup$
– ziggurism
Dec 19 '18 at 13:51
$begingroup$
are $mathfrak{su}(n)$ or $mathfrak{so}(n)$ even closed under multiplication?
$endgroup$
– ziggurism
Dec 19 '18 at 13:56
$begingroup$
sorry, let's add ${ id }$ to the set of generators
$endgroup$
– tonydo
Dec 19 '18 at 13:58
1
$begingroup$
Why would such identities be of interest? A representation of the Lie algebra need not preserve such product relations, only commutators.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 19 '18 at 17:26