“algebraic openness” of the epigraph of a sublinear function












3












$begingroup$


Let $X$ be a real linear space, $p:X rightarrow mathbb{R}$ a sub-linear function, i.e:
$$forall x,yin X;p(x)+p(y) geq p(x+y)$$
$$forall lambda geq 0,x in X ; p(lambda x)=lambda p(x)$$
Consider the strict upper epigraph:
$$Gamma^+(p)={(x,y) ,vert, x in X,y > f(x)} subseteq Xtimesmathbb{R}$$
One sees that $p$ is convex and thus $Gamma^+(p)$ is convex.
My question is about it's "algebraic openness", formally define that $v in Gamma^+(p)$ is an internal point if for all $u in Xtimes mathbb{R}$ there exists $delta_0 >0$ so that for all $vert delta vert leq delta_0$ we have $v+delta u in Gamma^+(p)$. My Question is whether it is true that every point in $Gamma^+(p)$ is an internal point. For those who are curious this is for an application of the Geometric version of the Hahn Banach Theorem.



Any help is appreciated. Thanks



Note: an affirmative answer is tempting since for $X=mathbb{R^n}$, $p$ is continues and thus it's strict epigraph is (topologically and thus "algebraically") open






functional-analysis convex-analysis







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    Let $X$ be a real linear space, $p:X rightarrow mathbb{R}$ a sub-linear function, i.e:
    $$forall x,yin X;p(x)+p(y) geq p(x+y)$$
    $$forall lambda geq 0,x in X ; p(lambda x)=lambda p(x)$$
    Consider the strict upper epigraph:
    $$Gamma^+(p)={(x,y) ,vert, x in X,y > f(x)} subseteq Xtimesmathbb{R}$$
    One sees that $p$ is convex and thus $Gamma^+(p)$ is convex.
    My question is about it's "algebraic openness", formally define that $v in Gamma^+(p)$ is an internal point if for all $u in Xtimes mathbb{R}$ there exists $delta_0 >0$ so that for all $vert delta vert leq delta_0$ we have $v+delta u in Gamma^+(p)$. My Question is whether it is true that every point in $Gamma^+(p)$ is an internal point. For those who are curious this is for an application of the Geometric version of the Hahn Banach Theorem.



    Any help is appreciated. Thanks



    Note: an affirmative answer is tempting since for $X=mathbb{R^n}$, $p$ is continues and thus it's strict epigraph is (topologically and thus "algebraically") open






    functional-analysis convex-analysis







    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3


      2



      $begingroup$


      Let $X$ be a real linear space, $p:X rightarrow mathbb{R}$ a sub-linear function, i.e:
      $$forall x,yin X;p(x)+p(y) geq p(x+y)$$
      $$forall lambda geq 0,x in X ; p(lambda x)=lambda p(x)$$
      Consider the strict upper epigraph:
      $$Gamma^+(p)={(x,y) ,vert, x in X,y > f(x)} subseteq Xtimesmathbb{R}$$
      One sees that $p$ is convex and thus $Gamma^+(p)$ is convex.
      My question is about it's "algebraic openness", formally define that $v in Gamma^+(p)$ is an internal point if for all $u in Xtimes mathbb{R}$ there exists $delta_0 >0$ so that for all $vert delta vert leq delta_0$ we have $v+delta u in Gamma^+(p)$. My Question is whether it is true that every point in $Gamma^+(p)$ is an internal point. For those who are curious this is for an application of the Geometric version of the Hahn Banach Theorem.



      Any help is appreciated. Thanks



      Note: an affirmative answer is tempting since for $X=mathbb{R^n}$, $p$ is continues and thus it's strict epigraph is (topologically and thus "algebraically") open






      functional-analysis convex-analysis







      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $X$ be a real linear space, $p:X rightarrow mathbb{R}$ a sub-linear function, i.e:
      $$forall x,yin X;p(x)+p(y) geq p(x+y)$$
      $$forall lambda geq 0,x in X ; p(lambda x)=lambda p(x)$$
      Consider the strict upper epigraph:
      $$Gamma^+(p)={(x,y) ,vert, x in X,y > f(x)} subseteq Xtimesmathbb{R}$$
      One sees that $p$ is convex and thus $Gamma^+(p)$ is convex.
      My question is about it's "algebraic openness", formally define that $v in Gamma^+(p)$ is an internal point if for all $u in Xtimes mathbb{R}$ there exists $delta_0 >0$ so that for all $vert delta vert leq delta_0$ we have $v+delta u in Gamma^+(p)$. My Question is whether it is true that every point in $Gamma^+(p)$ is an internal point. For those who are curious this is for an application of the Geometric version of the Hahn Banach Theorem.



      Any help is appreciated. Thanks



      Note: an affirmative answer is tempting since for $X=mathbb{R^n}$, $p$ is continues and thus it's strict epigraph is (topologically and thus "algebraically") open






      functional-analysis convex-analysis




      functional-analysis convex-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 26 '18 at 5:58







      pitariver

















      asked Dec 25 '18 at 11:26









      pitariverpitariver

      469213




      469213






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Turns out this questions isn't so hard, I solved it after having another go at it.
          As I mentioned the topology here is a starting pont. But since we are only talking internal points, we can use the topology on one dimension at a time.



          Let $(x,y)in Gamma^+(p),; y>p(x)$. Let $(w,r) in X times mathbb{R}$ be some vector. Note that $p(x+tw)$ is a continues function of $t$ at $0$ since:
          $$p(x+tw) leq p(x) + p(tw) = p(x) + vert t vert p(sign(t)x) underset{t rightarrow 0}{rightarrow} p(x)$$
          Similarly,
          $$p(x+tw) geq p(x) - p(tw) = p(x) - vert t vert p(sign(t)x) underset{t rightarrow 0}{rightarrow} p(x)$$
          and so $p(x+tw) underset{t rightarrow 0}{rightarrow} p(x)$. Since $y > p(x)$ we can
          take $delta_0$ small enough so that for all $vert delta vert < delta_0$ we have $p(x+delta w) < y$. Now let's check the definition of $(x,y)$ being internal: we want:
          $$p(x+ delta w) underset{?}{<} y + delta r$$
          But for $delta_0$ even smaller we can guarantee it, since $p(x+delta w) < y$ and $r$ is constant. $blacksquare$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052023%2falgebraic-openness-of-the-epigraph-of-a-sublinear-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            Turns out this questions isn't so hard, I solved it after having another go at it.
            As I mentioned the topology here is a starting pont. But since we are only talking internal points, we can use the topology on one dimension at a time.



            Let $(x,y)in Gamma^+(p),; y>p(x)$. Let $(w,r) in X times mathbb{R}$ be some vector. Note that $p(x+tw)$ is a continues function of $t$ at $0$ since:
            $$p(x+tw) leq p(x) + p(tw) = p(x) + vert t vert p(sign(t)x) underset{t rightarrow 0}{rightarrow} p(x)$$
            Similarly,
            $$p(x+tw) geq p(x) - p(tw) = p(x) - vert t vert p(sign(t)x) underset{t rightarrow 0}{rightarrow} p(x)$$
            and so $p(x+tw) underset{t rightarrow 0}{rightarrow} p(x)$. Since $y > p(x)$ we can
            take $delta_0$ small enough so that for all $vert delta vert < delta_0$ we have $p(x+delta w) < y$. Now let's check the definition of $(x,y)$ being internal: we want:
            $$p(x+ delta w) underset{?}{<} y + delta r$$
            But for $delta_0$ even smaller we can guarantee it, since $p(x+delta w) < y$ and $r$ is constant. $blacksquare$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Turns out this questions isn't so hard, I solved it after having another go at it.
              As I mentioned the topology here is a starting pont. But since we are only talking internal points, we can use the topology on one dimension at a time.



              Let $(x,y)in Gamma^+(p),; y>p(x)$. Let $(w,r) in X times mathbb{R}$ be some vector. Note that $p(x+tw)$ is a continues function of $t$ at $0$ since:
              $$p(x+tw) leq p(x) + p(tw) = p(x) + vert t vert p(sign(t)x) underset{t rightarrow 0}{rightarrow} p(x)$$
              Similarly,
              $$p(x+tw) geq p(x) - p(tw) = p(x) - vert t vert p(sign(t)x) underset{t rightarrow 0}{rightarrow} p(x)$$
              and so $p(x+tw) underset{t rightarrow 0}{rightarrow} p(x)$. Since $y > p(x)$ we can
              take $delta_0$ small enough so that for all $vert delta vert < delta_0$ we have $p(x+delta w) < y$. Now let's check the definition of $(x,y)$ being internal: we want:
              $$p(x+ delta w) underset{?}{<} y + delta r$$
              But for $delta_0$ even smaller we can guarantee it, since $p(x+delta w) < y$ and $r$ is constant. $blacksquare$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Turns out this questions isn't so hard, I solved it after having another go at it.
                As I mentioned the topology here is a starting pont. But since we are only talking internal points, we can use the topology on one dimension at a time.



                Let $(x,y)in Gamma^+(p),; y>p(x)$. Let $(w,r) in X times mathbb{R}$ be some vector. Note that $p(x+tw)$ is a continues function of $t$ at $0$ since:
                $$p(x+tw) leq p(x) + p(tw) = p(x) + vert t vert p(sign(t)x) underset{t rightarrow 0}{rightarrow} p(x)$$
                Similarly,
                $$p(x+tw) geq p(x) - p(tw) = p(x) - vert t vert p(sign(t)x) underset{t rightarrow 0}{rightarrow} p(x)$$
                and so $p(x+tw) underset{t rightarrow 0}{rightarrow} p(x)$. Since $y > p(x)$ we can
                take $delta_0$ small enough so that for all $vert delta vert < delta_0$ we have $p(x+delta w) < y$. Now let's check the definition of $(x,y)$ being internal: we want:
                $$p(x+ delta w) underset{?}{<} y + delta r$$
                But for $delta_0$ even smaller we can guarantee it, since $p(x+delta w) < y$ and $r$ is constant. $blacksquare$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Turns out this questions isn't so hard, I solved it after having another go at it.
                As I mentioned the topology here is a starting pont. But since we are only talking internal points, we can use the topology on one dimension at a time.



                Let $(x,y)in Gamma^+(p),; y>p(x)$. Let $(w,r) in X times mathbb{R}$ be some vector. Note that $p(x+tw)$ is a continues function of $t$ at $0$ since:
                $$p(x+tw) leq p(x) + p(tw) = p(x) + vert t vert p(sign(t)x) underset{t rightarrow 0}{rightarrow} p(x)$$
                Similarly,
                $$p(x+tw) geq p(x) - p(tw) = p(x) - vert t vert p(sign(t)x) underset{t rightarrow 0}{rightarrow} p(x)$$
                and so $p(x+tw) underset{t rightarrow 0}{rightarrow} p(x)$. Since $y > p(x)$ we can
                take $delta_0$ small enough so that for all $vert delta vert < delta_0$ we have $p(x+delta w) < y$. Now let's check the definition of $(x,y)$ being internal: we want:
                $$p(x+ delta w) underset{?}{<} y + delta r$$
                But for $delta_0$ even smaller we can guarantee it, since $p(x+delta w) < y$ and $r$ is constant. $blacksquare$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 27 '18 at 6:20









                pitariverpitariver

                469213




                469213






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052023%2falgebraic-openness-of-the-epigraph-of-a-sublinear-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bundesstraße 106

                    Image
                    Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück ...
                    Read more

                    Verónica Boquete

                    Image
                    Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl ...
                    Read more

                    Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

                    Image
                    Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich ...
                    Read more