Is it legal to have the “// (c) 2019 John Smith” header in all files when there are hundreds of...












1















Companies use headers like



// Copyright 2011 The Go Authors.



But countless projects with a single maintainer have



// Copyright 2011 John Smith



even though they have hundreds of contributors, all of whom own their contributions.



Is this ok to only include the owner in the header?



Thanks










share|improve this question



























    1















    Companies use headers like



    // Copyright 2011 The Go Authors.



    But countless projects with a single maintainer have



    // Copyright 2011 John Smith



    even though they have hundreds of contributors, all of whom own their contributions.



    Is this ok to only include the owner in the header?



    Thanks










    share|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1








      Companies use headers like



      // Copyright 2011 The Go Authors.



      But countless projects with a single maintainer have



      // Copyright 2011 John Smith



      even though they have hundreds of contributors, all of whom own their contributions.



      Is this ok to only include the owner in the header?



      Thanks










      share|improve this question














      Companies use headers like



      // Copyright 2011 The Go Authors.



      But countless projects with a single maintainer have



      // Copyright 2011 John Smith



      even though they have hundreds of contributors, all of whom own their contributions.



      Is this ok to only include the owner in the header?



      Thanks







      copyright programming






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 6 hours ago









      AlexAlex

      1374




      1374






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          As far as I am aware, all FLOSS licenses that deal with copyright notices only require the preservation of notices that exist. Each author had the opportunity to add their own name to header when they made their contribution. If they chose not to do so, there is no existing notice from that author to preserve. There is never (as far as I know) any requirement to proactively add a notice that an author chose not to include.



          Not having a copyright notice for some copyright holder is not inherently legally problematic, either, since copyright notices have virtually no legal function. Since a majority of nations ratified the Berne Convention, copyright rights are automatically granted at the time of a work's creation, irrespective of any copyright notice on the work.



          If someone removes existing copyright notices from another author, then that's obviously not allowed by the license (and is typically illegal in general).






          share|improve this answer


























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "619"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fopensource.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8168%2fis-it-legal-to-have-the-c-2019-john-smith-header-in-all-files-when-there%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3














            As far as I am aware, all FLOSS licenses that deal with copyright notices only require the preservation of notices that exist. Each author had the opportunity to add their own name to header when they made their contribution. If they chose not to do so, there is no existing notice from that author to preserve. There is never (as far as I know) any requirement to proactively add a notice that an author chose not to include.



            Not having a copyright notice for some copyright holder is not inherently legally problematic, either, since copyright notices have virtually no legal function. Since a majority of nations ratified the Berne Convention, copyright rights are automatically granted at the time of a work's creation, irrespective of any copyright notice on the work.



            If someone removes existing copyright notices from another author, then that's obviously not allowed by the license (and is typically illegal in general).






            share|improve this answer






























              3














              As far as I am aware, all FLOSS licenses that deal with copyright notices only require the preservation of notices that exist. Each author had the opportunity to add their own name to header when they made their contribution. If they chose not to do so, there is no existing notice from that author to preserve. There is never (as far as I know) any requirement to proactively add a notice that an author chose not to include.



              Not having a copyright notice for some copyright holder is not inherently legally problematic, either, since copyright notices have virtually no legal function. Since a majority of nations ratified the Berne Convention, copyright rights are automatically granted at the time of a work's creation, irrespective of any copyright notice on the work.



              If someone removes existing copyright notices from another author, then that's obviously not allowed by the license (and is typically illegal in general).






              share|improve this answer




























                3












                3








                3







                As far as I am aware, all FLOSS licenses that deal with copyright notices only require the preservation of notices that exist. Each author had the opportunity to add their own name to header when they made their contribution. If they chose not to do so, there is no existing notice from that author to preserve. There is never (as far as I know) any requirement to proactively add a notice that an author chose not to include.



                Not having a copyright notice for some copyright holder is not inherently legally problematic, either, since copyright notices have virtually no legal function. Since a majority of nations ratified the Berne Convention, copyright rights are automatically granted at the time of a work's creation, irrespective of any copyright notice on the work.



                If someone removes existing copyright notices from another author, then that's obviously not allowed by the license (and is typically illegal in general).






                share|improve this answer















                As far as I am aware, all FLOSS licenses that deal with copyright notices only require the preservation of notices that exist. Each author had the opportunity to add their own name to header when they made their contribution. If they chose not to do so, there is no existing notice from that author to preserve. There is never (as far as I know) any requirement to proactively add a notice that an author chose not to include.



                Not having a copyright notice for some copyright holder is not inherently legally problematic, either, since copyright notices have virtually no legal function. Since a majority of nations ratified the Berne Convention, copyright rights are automatically granted at the time of a work's creation, irrespective of any copyright notice on the work.



                If someone removes existing copyright notices from another author, then that's obviously not allowed by the license (and is typically illegal in general).







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 4 hours ago

























                answered 5 hours ago









                apsillersapsillers

                15.9k12653




                15.9k12653






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Open Source Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fopensource.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8168%2fis-it-legal-to-have-the-c-2019-john-smith-header-in-all-files-when-there%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bundesstraße 106

                    Verónica Boquete

                    Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten