Schubert variety associated to a flag of subspaces of a vector space












0












$begingroup$


At the end of the following page : The associated Schubert variety of a flag of subspaces of a vector space. , the author says :



Let $[W]in X=X_{underline i}$, by construction:
begin{equation}
[W]=[v_1wedgedotswedge v_k]=left[sum_{underline{j}lequnderline{i}}d_{underline j}e_{underline j}right]
end{equation}
in particular:
begin{equation}
forall hin{1,dots,k},,dimleft(Wcap F_{i_h}right)geq h
end{equation}
and vice versa.



Could someone explain to me why have we this, in details please ?



Thanks in advance for your help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Is it clear the definition of $W$? I remember you that $underline{j}notlequnderline{i},,d_{underline{j}}=0$, in my notation!
    $endgroup$
    – Armando j18eos
    Mar 27 '18 at 22:24










  • $begingroup$
    $ W in X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr}_{d,n} | d_{ underline{j} } = 0 , forall j in I_{d,n} text{such that} underline{j} not leq underline{i} } $, but, why is $ X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr}_{d,n} | dim (W cap F_{i_{h}} geq h } $ ? Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – YoYo
    Mar 28 '18 at 15:18






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Because lemma 1.4.5 by Littelmann's lecture notes holds.
    $endgroup$
    – Armando j18eos
    Mar 28 '18 at 17:12












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, i know, but untill now, i'm not able to make a link between lemma 1.4.5 and : $ X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr_{d,n}} | dim ( W cap F_{i_{h}} ) geq h } $. Could you try to explain to me this point please ? Thank you. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – YoYo
    Mar 28 '18 at 18:32








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it is all right. Well done. ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Armando j18eos
    Mar 29 '18 at 8:33
















0












$begingroup$


At the end of the following page : The associated Schubert variety of a flag of subspaces of a vector space. , the author says :



Let $[W]in X=X_{underline i}$, by construction:
begin{equation}
[W]=[v_1wedgedotswedge v_k]=left[sum_{underline{j}lequnderline{i}}d_{underline j}e_{underline j}right]
end{equation}
in particular:
begin{equation}
forall hin{1,dots,k},,dimleft(Wcap F_{i_h}right)geq h
end{equation}
and vice versa.



Could someone explain to me why have we this, in details please ?



Thanks in advance for your help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Is it clear the definition of $W$? I remember you that $underline{j}notlequnderline{i},,d_{underline{j}}=0$, in my notation!
    $endgroup$
    – Armando j18eos
    Mar 27 '18 at 22:24










  • $begingroup$
    $ W in X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr}_{d,n} | d_{ underline{j} } = 0 , forall j in I_{d,n} text{such that} underline{j} not leq underline{i} } $, but, why is $ X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr}_{d,n} | dim (W cap F_{i_{h}} geq h } $ ? Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – YoYo
    Mar 28 '18 at 15:18






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Because lemma 1.4.5 by Littelmann's lecture notes holds.
    $endgroup$
    – Armando j18eos
    Mar 28 '18 at 17:12












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, i know, but untill now, i'm not able to make a link between lemma 1.4.5 and : $ X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr_{d,n}} | dim ( W cap F_{i_{h}} ) geq h } $. Could you try to explain to me this point please ? Thank you. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – YoYo
    Mar 28 '18 at 18:32








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it is all right. Well done. ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Armando j18eos
    Mar 29 '18 at 8:33














0












0








0





$begingroup$


At the end of the following page : The associated Schubert variety of a flag of subspaces of a vector space. , the author says :



Let $[W]in X=X_{underline i}$, by construction:
begin{equation}
[W]=[v_1wedgedotswedge v_k]=left[sum_{underline{j}lequnderline{i}}d_{underline j}e_{underline j}right]
end{equation}
in particular:
begin{equation}
forall hin{1,dots,k},,dimleft(Wcap F_{i_h}right)geq h
end{equation}
and vice versa.



Could someone explain to me why have we this, in details please ?



Thanks in advance for your help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




At the end of the following page : The associated Schubert variety of a flag of subspaces of a vector space. , the author says :



Let $[W]in X=X_{underline i}$, by construction:
begin{equation}
[W]=[v_1wedgedotswedge v_k]=left[sum_{underline{j}lequnderline{i}}d_{underline j}e_{underline j}right]
end{equation}
in particular:
begin{equation}
forall hin{1,dots,k},,dimleft(Wcap F_{i_h}right)geq h
end{equation}
and vice versa.



Could someone explain to me why have we this, in details please ?



Thanks in advance for your help.







algebraic-geometry algebraic-groups grassmannian schubert-calculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 25 '18 at 11:47









Matt Samuel

39.2k63770




39.2k63770










asked Feb 26 '18 at 11:17









YoYoYoYo

56739




56739








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Is it clear the definition of $W$? I remember you that $underline{j}notlequnderline{i},,d_{underline{j}}=0$, in my notation!
    $endgroup$
    – Armando j18eos
    Mar 27 '18 at 22:24










  • $begingroup$
    $ W in X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr}_{d,n} | d_{ underline{j} } = 0 , forall j in I_{d,n} text{such that} underline{j} not leq underline{i} } $, but, why is $ X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr}_{d,n} | dim (W cap F_{i_{h}} geq h } $ ? Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – YoYo
    Mar 28 '18 at 15:18






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Because lemma 1.4.5 by Littelmann's lecture notes holds.
    $endgroup$
    – Armando j18eos
    Mar 28 '18 at 17:12












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, i know, but untill now, i'm not able to make a link between lemma 1.4.5 and : $ X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr_{d,n}} | dim ( W cap F_{i_{h}} ) geq h } $. Could you try to explain to me this point please ? Thank you. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – YoYo
    Mar 28 '18 at 18:32








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it is all right. Well done. ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Armando j18eos
    Mar 29 '18 at 8:33














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Is it clear the definition of $W$? I remember you that $underline{j}notlequnderline{i},,d_{underline{j}}=0$, in my notation!
    $endgroup$
    – Armando j18eos
    Mar 27 '18 at 22:24










  • $begingroup$
    $ W in X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr}_{d,n} | d_{ underline{j} } = 0 , forall j in I_{d,n} text{such that} underline{j} not leq underline{i} } $, but, why is $ X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr}_{d,n} | dim (W cap F_{i_{h}} geq h } $ ? Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – YoYo
    Mar 28 '18 at 15:18






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Because lemma 1.4.5 by Littelmann's lecture notes holds.
    $endgroup$
    – Armando j18eos
    Mar 28 '18 at 17:12












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, i know, but untill now, i'm not able to make a link between lemma 1.4.5 and : $ X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr_{d,n}} | dim ( W cap F_{i_{h}} ) geq h } $. Could you try to explain to me this point please ? Thank you. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – YoYo
    Mar 28 '18 at 18:32








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it is all right. Well done. ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Armando j18eos
    Mar 29 '18 at 8:33








1




1




$begingroup$
Is it clear the definition of $W$? I remember you that $underline{j}notlequnderline{i},,d_{underline{j}}=0$, in my notation!
$endgroup$
– Armando j18eos
Mar 27 '18 at 22:24




$begingroup$
Is it clear the definition of $W$? I remember you that $underline{j}notlequnderline{i},,d_{underline{j}}=0$, in my notation!
$endgroup$
– Armando j18eos
Mar 27 '18 at 22:24












$begingroup$
$ W in X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr}_{d,n} | d_{ underline{j} } = 0 , forall j in I_{d,n} text{such that} underline{j} not leq underline{i} } $, but, why is $ X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr}_{d,n} | dim (W cap F_{i_{h}} geq h } $ ? Thank you.
$endgroup$
– YoYo
Mar 28 '18 at 15:18




$begingroup$
$ W in X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr}_{d,n} | d_{ underline{j} } = 0 , forall j in I_{d,n} text{such that} underline{j} not leq underline{i} } $, but, why is $ X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr}_{d,n} | dim (W cap F_{i_{h}} geq h } $ ? Thank you.
$endgroup$
– YoYo
Mar 28 '18 at 15:18




1




1




$begingroup$
Because lemma 1.4.5 by Littelmann's lecture notes holds.
$endgroup$
– Armando j18eos
Mar 28 '18 at 17:12






$begingroup$
Because lemma 1.4.5 by Littelmann's lecture notes holds.
$endgroup$
– Armando j18eos
Mar 28 '18 at 17:12














$begingroup$
Yes, i know, but untill now, i'm not able to make a link between lemma 1.4.5 and : $ X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr_{d,n}} | dim ( W cap F_{i_{h}} ) geq h } $. Could you try to explain to me this point please ? Thank you. :-)
$endgroup$
– YoYo
Mar 28 '18 at 18:32






$begingroup$
Yes, i know, but untill now, i'm not able to make a link between lemma 1.4.5 and : $ X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr_{d,n}} | dim ( W cap F_{i_{h}} ) geq h } $. Could you try to explain to me this point please ? Thank you. :-)
$endgroup$
– YoYo
Mar 28 '18 at 18:32






1




1




$begingroup$
Yes, it is all right. Well done. ;)
$endgroup$
– Armando j18eos
Mar 29 '18 at 8:33




$begingroup$
Yes, it is all right. Well done. ;)
$endgroup$
– Armando j18eos
Mar 29 '18 at 8:33










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2667295%2fschubert-variety-associated-to-a-flag-of-subspaces-of-a-vector-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2667295%2fschubert-variety-associated-to-a-flag-of-subspaces-of-a-vector-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bundesstraße 106

Verónica Boquete

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten