Schubert variety associated to a flag of subspaces of a vector space
$begingroup$
At the end of the following page : The associated Schubert variety of a flag of subspaces of a vector space. , the author says :
Let $[W]in X=X_{underline i}$, by construction:
begin{equation}
[W]=[v_1wedgedotswedge v_k]=left[sum_{underline{j}lequnderline{i}}d_{underline j}e_{underline j}right]
end{equation}
in particular:
begin{equation}
forall hin{1,dots,k},,dimleft(Wcap F_{i_h}right)geq h
end{equation}
and vice versa.
Could someone explain to me why have we this, in details please ?
Thanks in advance for your help.
algebraic-geometry algebraic-groups grassmannian schubert-calculus
$endgroup$
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
At the end of the following page : The associated Schubert variety of a flag of subspaces of a vector space. , the author says :
Let $[W]in X=X_{underline i}$, by construction:
begin{equation}
[W]=[v_1wedgedotswedge v_k]=left[sum_{underline{j}lequnderline{i}}d_{underline j}e_{underline j}right]
end{equation}
in particular:
begin{equation}
forall hin{1,dots,k},,dimleft(Wcap F_{i_h}right)geq h
end{equation}
and vice versa.
Could someone explain to me why have we this, in details please ?
Thanks in advance for your help.
algebraic-geometry algebraic-groups grassmannian schubert-calculus
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Is it clear the definition of $W$? I remember you that $underline{j}notlequnderline{i},,d_{underline{j}}=0$, in my notation!
$endgroup$
– Armando j18eos
Mar 27 '18 at 22:24
$begingroup$
$ W in X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr}_{d,n} | d_{ underline{j} } = 0 , forall j in I_{d,n} text{such that} underline{j} not leq underline{i} } $, but, why is $ X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr}_{d,n} | dim (W cap F_{i_{h}} geq h } $ ? Thank you.
$endgroup$
– YoYo
Mar 28 '18 at 15:18
1
$begingroup$
Because lemma 1.4.5 by Littelmann's lecture notes holds.
$endgroup$
– Armando j18eos
Mar 28 '18 at 17:12
$begingroup$
Yes, i know, but untill now, i'm not able to make a link between lemma 1.4.5 and : $ X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr_{d,n}} | dim ( W cap F_{i_{h}} ) geq h } $. Could you try to explain to me this point please ? Thank you. :-)
$endgroup$
– YoYo
Mar 28 '18 at 18:32
1
$begingroup$
Yes, it is all right. Well done. ;)
$endgroup$
– Armando j18eos
Mar 29 '18 at 8:33
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
At the end of the following page : The associated Schubert variety of a flag of subspaces of a vector space. , the author says :
Let $[W]in X=X_{underline i}$, by construction:
begin{equation}
[W]=[v_1wedgedotswedge v_k]=left[sum_{underline{j}lequnderline{i}}d_{underline j}e_{underline j}right]
end{equation}
in particular:
begin{equation}
forall hin{1,dots,k},,dimleft(Wcap F_{i_h}right)geq h
end{equation}
and vice versa.
Could someone explain to me why have we this, in details please ?
Thanks in advance for your help.
algebraic-geometry algebraic-groups grassmannian schubert-calculus
$endgroup$
At the end of the following page : The associated Schubert variety of a flag of subspaces of a vector space. , the author says :
Let $[W]in X=X_{underline i}$, by construction:
begin{equation}
[W]=[v_1wedgedotswedge v_k]=left[sum_{underline{j}lequnderline{i}}d_{underline j}e_{underline j}right]
end{equation}
in particular:
begin{equation}
forall hin{1,dots,k},,dimleft(Wcap F_{i_h}right)geq h
end{equation}
and vice versa.
Could someone explain to me why have we this, in details please ?
Thanks in advance for your help.
algebraic-geometry algebraic-groups grassmannian schubert-calculus
algebraic-geometry algebraic-groups grassmannian schubert-calculus
edited Dec 25 '18 at 11:47
Matt Samuel
39.2k63770
39.2k63770
asked Feb 26 '18 at 11:17
YoYoYoYo
56739
56739
1
$begingroup$
Is it clear the definition of $W$? I remember you that $underline{j}notlequnderline{i},,d_{underline{j}}=0$, in my notation!
$endgroup$
– Armando j18eos
Mar 27 '18 at 22:24
$begingroup$
$ W in X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr}_{d,n} | d_{ underline{j} } = 0 , forall j in I_{d,n} text{such that} underline{j} not leq underline{i} } $, but, why is $ X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr}_{d,n} | dim (W cap F_{i_{h}} geq h } $ ? Thank you.
$endgroup$
– YoYo
Mar 28 '18 at 15:18
1
$begingroup$
Because lemma 1.4.5 by Littelmann's lecture notes holds.
$endgroup$
– Armando j18eos
Mar 28 '18 at 17:12
$begingroup$
Yes, i know, but untill now, i'm not able to make a link between lemma 1.4.5 and : $ X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr_{d,n}} | dim ( W cap F_{i_{h}} ) geq h } $. Could you try to explain to me this point please ? Thank you. :-)
$endgroup$
– YoYo
Mar 28 '18 at 18:32
1
$begingroup$
Yes, it is all right. Well done. ;)
$endgroup$
– Armando j18eos
Mar 29 '18 at 8:33
|
show 2 more comments
1
$begingroup$
Is it clear the definition of $W$? I remember you that $underline{j}notlequnderline{i},,d_{underline{j}}=0$, in my notation!
$endgroup$
– Armando j18eos
Mar 27 '18 at 22:24
$begingroup$
$ W in X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr}_{d,n} | d_{ underline{j} } = 0 , forall j in I_{d,n} text{such that} underline{j} not leq underline{i} } $, but, why is $ X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr}_{d,n} | dim (W cap F_{i_{h}} geq h } $ ? Thank you.
$endgroup$
– YoYo
Mar 28 '18 at 15:18
1
$begingroup$
Because lemma 1.4.5 by Littelmann's lecture notes holds.
$endgroup$
– Armando j18eos
Mar 28 '18 at 17:12
$begingroup$
Yes, i know, but untill now, i'm not able to make a link between lemma 1.4.5 and : $ X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr_{d,n}} | dim ( W cap F_{i_{h}} ) geq h } $. Could you try to explain to me this point please ? Thank you. :-)
$endgroup$
– YoYo
Mar 28 '18 at 18:32
1
$begingroup$
Yes, it is all right. Well done. ;)
$endgroup$
– Armando j18eos
Mar 29 '18 at 8:33
1
1
$begingroup$
Is it clear the definition of $W$? I remember you that $underline{j}notlequnderline{i},,d_{underline{j}}=0$, in my notation!
$endgroup$
– Armando j18eos
Mar 27 '18 at 22:24
$begingroup$
Is it clear the definition of $W$? I remember you that $underline{j}notlequnderline{i},,d_{underline{j}}=0$, in my notation!
$endgroup$
– Armando j18eos
Mar 27 '18 at 22:24
$begingroup$
$ W in X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr}_{d,n} | d_{ underline{j} } = 0 , forall j in I_{d,n} text{such that} underline{j} not leq underline{i} } $, but, why is $ X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr}_{d,n} | dim (W cap F_{i_{h}} geq h } $ ? Thank you.
$endgroup$
– YoYo
Mar 28 '18 at 15:18
$begingroup$
$ W in X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr}_{d,n} | d_{ underline{j} } = 0 , forall j in I_{d,n} text{such that} underline{j} not leq underline{i} } $, but, why is $ X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr}_{d,n} | dim (W cap F_{i_{h}} geq h } $ ? Thank you.
$endgroup$
– YoYo
Mar 28 '18 at 15:18
1
1
$begingroup$
Because lemma 1.4.5 by Littelmann's lecture notes holds.
$endgroup$
– Armando j18eos
Mar 28 '18 at 17:12
$begingroup$
Because lemma 1.4.5 by Littelmann's lecture notes holds.
$endgroup$
– Armando j18eos
Mar 28 '18 at 17:12
$begingroup$
Yes, i know, but untill now, i'm not able to make a link between lemma 1.4.5 and : $ X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr_{d,n}} | dim ( W cap F_{i_{h}} ) geq h } $. Could you try to explain to me this point please ? Thank you. :-)
$endgroup$
– YoYo
Mar 28 '18 at 18:32
$begingroup$
Yes, i know, but untill now, i'm not able to make a link between lemma 1.4.5 and : $ X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr_{d,n}} | dim ( W cap F_{i_{h}} ) geq h } $. Could you try to explain to me this point please ? Thank you. :-)
$endgroup$
– YoYo
Mar 28 '18 at 18:32
1
1
$begingroup$
Yes, it is all right. Well done. ;)
$endgroup$
– Armando j18eos
Mar 29 '18 at 8:33
$begingroup$
Yes, it is all right. Well done. ;)
$endgroup$
– Armando j18eos
Mar 29 '18 at 8:33
|
show 2 more comments
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2667295%2fschubert-variety-associated-to-a-flag-of-subspaces-of-a-vector-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2667295%2fschubert-variety-associated-to-a-flag-of-subspaces-of-a-vector-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Is it clear the definition of $W$? I remember you that $underline{j}notlequnderline{i},,d_{underline{j}}=0$, in my notation!
$endgroup$
– Armando j18eos
Mar 27 '18 at 22:24
$begingroup$
$ W in X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr}_{d,n} | d_{ underline{j} } = 0 , forall j in I_{d,n} text{such that} underline{j} not leq underline{i} } $, but, why is $ X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr}_{d,n} | dim (W cap F_{i_{h}} geq h } $ ? Thank you.
$endgroup$
– YoYo
Mar 28 '18 at 15:18
1
$begingroup$
Because lemma 1.4.5 by Littelmann's lecture notes holds.
$endgroup$
– Armando j18eos
Mar 28 '18 at 17:12
$begingroup$
Yes, i know, but untill now, i'm not able to make a link between lemma 1.4.5 and : $ X_{ underline{i} } = { W in mathrm{Gr_{d,n}} | dim ( W cap F_{i_{h}} ) geq h } $. Could you try to explain to me this point please ? Thank you. :-)
$endgroup$
– YoYo
Mar 28 '18 at 18:32
1
$begingroup$
Yes, it is all right. Well done. ;)
$endgroup$
– Armando j18eos
Mar 29 '18 at 8:33