Einstein metrics on spheres












3












$begingroup$


I've got a couple of quick questions that came up after reading a peculiar statement in some article. The sentence says something like "... is the $N$-dimensional sphere with constant Ricci curvature equal to $K$...", and the questions are something like:



For $(mathbb{S}^n,g)$ the sphere with its standard differential structure and $some$ Riemannian metric on it,



1.a. Does $g$ being an Einstein metric implies that it is actually the round metric (up to some normalization constant)?



1.b. Does the answer change if we change to an alternative differential structure (when possible)?



I guess this shouldn't be true, so in this case



2. Is there an intuitive way to understand how one could construct a metric which is Einstein but not of constant curvature?



Anyways, I thank you all in advance for sharing your knowledge.






differential-geometry riemannian-geometry







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    I've got a couple of quick questions that came up after reading a peculiar statement in some article. The sentence says something like "... is the $N$-dimensional sphere with constant Ricci curvature equal to $K$...", and the questions are something like:



    For $(mathbb{S}^n,g)$ the sphere with its standard differential structure and $some$ Riemannian metric on it,



    1.a. Does $g$ being an Einstein metric implies that it is actually the round metric (up to some normalization constant)?



    1.b. Does the answer change if we change to an alternative differential structure (when possible)?



    I guess this shouldn't be true, so in this case



    2. Is there an intuitive way to understand how one could construct a metric which is Einstein but not of constant curvature?



    Anyways, I thank you all in advance for sharing your knowledge.






    differential-geometry riemannian-geometry







    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      I've got a couple of quick questions that came up after reading a peculiar statement in some article. The sentence says something like "... is the $N$-dimensional sphere with constant Ricci curvature equal to $K$...", and the questions are something like:



      For $(mathbb{S}^n,g)$ the sphere with its standard differential structure and $some$ Riemannian metric on it,



      1.a. Does $g$ being an Einstein metric implies that it is actually the round metric (up to some normalization constant)?



      1.b. Does the answer change if we change to an alternative differential structure (when possible)?



      I guess this shouldn't be true, so in this case



      2. Is there an intuitive way to understand how one could construct a metric which is Einstein but not of constant curvature?



      Anyways, I thank you all in advance for sharing your knowledge.






      differential-geometry riemannian-geometry







      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I've got a couple of quick questions that came up after reading a peculiar statement in some article. The sentence says something like "... is the $N$-dimensional sphere with constant Ricci curvature equal to $K$...", and the questions are something like:



      For $(mathbb{S}^n,g)$ the sphere with its standard differential structure and $some$ Riemannian metric on it,



      1.a. Does $g$ being an Einstein metric implies that it is actually the round metric (up to some normalization constant)?



      1.b. Does the answer change if we change to an alternative differential structure (when possible)?



      I guess this shouldn't be true, so in this case



      2. Is there an intuitive way to understand how one could construct a metric which is Einstein but not of constant curvature?



      Anyways, I thank you all in advance for sharing your knowledge.






      differential-geometry riemannian-geometry




      differential-geometry riemannian-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 12 hours ago









      Michael Albanese

      64.6k1599315




      64.6k1599315










      asked 12 hours ago









      Bruce WayneBruce Wayne

      453213




      453213






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6












          $begingroup$

          No, there are Einstein metrics on spheres which are not rescalings of the round metric. See the introduction of Einstein metrics on spheres by Boyer, Galicki, & Kollár for some constructions. However, as far as I am aware, there are no known examples of Einstein metrics with non-positive Einstein constant. In particular, it is an open question as to whether $S^n$ admits a Ricci-flat metric for $n geq 4$.



          If we consider exotic spheres, they do not admit a 'round metric' or any metric of constant curvature, so I'm not sure what is meant by this. However, there are examples of Einstein metrics on exotic spheres, see Einstein Metrics on Exotic Spheres in Dimensions 7, 11, and 15 by Boyer, Galicki, Kollár, & Thomas for example. Note however that there are some exotic spheres which, if they admit Einstein metrics, must have negative Einstein constant.



          Finding Einstein metrics which are not constant curvature is, in general, a hard thing to do and an area of active research.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            great, thanks! Yeah, of course you are right, question 1b doesn't make sense as stated. I wrote it fast, sorry!
            $endgroup$
            – Bruce Wayne
            11 hours ago












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179975%2feinstein-metrics-on-spheres%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          6












          $begingroup$

          No, there are Einstein metrics on spheres which are not rescalings of the round metric. See the introduction of Einstein metrics on spheres by Boyer, Galicki, & Kollár for some constructions. However, as far as I am aware, there are no known examples of Einstein metrics with non-positive Einstein constant. In particular, it is an open question as to whether $S^n$ admits a Ricci-flat metric for $n geq 4$.



          If we consider exotic spheres, they do not admit a 'round metric' or any metric of constant curvature, so I'm not sure what is meant by this. However, there are examples of Einstein metrics on exotic spheres, see Einstein Metrics on Exotic Spheres in Dimensions 7, 11, and 15 by Boyer, Galicki, Kollár, & Thomas for example. Note however that there are some exotic spheres which, if they admit Einstein metrics, must have negative Einstein constant.



          Finding Einstein metrics which are not constant curvature is, in general, a hard thing to do and an area of active research.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            great, thanks! Yeah, of course you are right, question 1b doesn't make sense as stated. I wrote it fast, sorry!
            $endgroup$
            – Bruce Wayne
            11 hours ago
















          6












          $begingroup$

          No, there are Einstein metrics on spheres which are not rescalings of the round metric. See the introduction of Einstein metrics on spheres by Boyer, Galicki, & Kollár for some constructions. However, as far as I am aware, there are no known examples of Einstein metrics with non-positive Einstein constant. In particular, it is an open question as to whether $S^n$ admits a Ricci-flat metric for $n geq 4$.



          If we consider exotic spheres, they do not admit a 'round metric' or any metric of constant curvature, so I'm not sure what is meant by this. However, there are examples of Einstein metrics on exotic spheres, see Einstein Metrics on Exotic Spheres in Dimensions 7, 11, and 15 by Boyer, Galicki, Kollár, & Thomas for example. Note however that there are some exotic spheres which, if they admit Einstein metrics, must have negative Einstein constant.



          Finding Einstein metrics which are not constant curvature is, in general, a hard thing to do and an area of active research.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            great, thanks! Yeah, of course you are right, question 1b doesn't make sense as stated. I wrote it fast, sorry!
            $endgroup$
            – Bruce Wayne
            11 hours ago














          6












          6








          6





          $begingroup$

          No, there are Einstein metrics on spheres which are not rescalings of the round metric. See the introduction of Einstein metrics on spheres by Boyer, Galicki, & Kollár for some constructions. However, as far as I am aware, there are no known examples of Einstein metrics with non-positive Einstein constant. In particular, it is an open question as to whether $S^n$ admits a Ricci-flat metric for $n geq 4$.



          If we consider exotic spheres, they do not admit a 'round metric' or any metric of constant curvature, so I'm not sure what is meant by this. However, there are examples of Einstein metrics on exotic spheres, see Einstein Metrics on Exotic Spheres in Dimensions 7, 11, and 15 by Boyer, Galicki, Kollár, & Thomas for example. Note however that there are some exotic spheres which, if they admit Einstein metrics, must have negative Einstein constant.



          Finding Einstein metrics which are not constant curvature is, in general, a hard thing to do and an area of active research.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          No, there are Einstein metrics on spheres which are not rescalings of the round metric. See the introduction of Einstein metrics on spheres by Boyer, Galicki, & Kollár for some constructions. However, as far as I am aware, there are no known examples of Einstein metrics with non-positive Einstein constant. In particular, it is an open question as to whether $S^n$ admits a Ricci-flat metric for $n geq 4$.



          If we consider exotic spheres, they do not admit a 'round metric' or any metric of constant curvature, so I'm not sure what is meant by this. However, there are examples of Einstein metrics on exotic spheres, see Einstein Metrics on Exotic Spheres in Dimensions 7, 11, and 15 by Boyer, Galicki, Kollár, & Thomas for example. Note however that there are some exotic spheres which, if they admit Einstein metrics, must have negative Einstein constant.



          Finding Einstein metrics which are not constant curvature is, in general, a hard thing to do and an area of active research.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 11 hours ago

























          answered 12 hours ago









          Michael AlbaneseMichael Albanese

          64.6k1599315




          64.6k1599315












          • $begingroup$
            great, thanks! Yeah, of course you are right, question 1b doesn't make sense as stated. I wrote it fast, sorry!
            $endgroup$
            – Bruce Wayne
            11 hours ago


















          • $begingroup$
            great, thanks! Yeah, of course you are right, question 1b doesn't make sense as stated. I wrote it fast, sorry!
            $endgroup$
            – Bruce Wayne
            11 hours ago
















          $begingroup$
          great, thanks! Yeah, of course you are right, question 1b doesn't make sense as stated. I wrote it fast, sorry!
          $endgroup$
          – Bruce Wayne
          11 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          great, thanks! Yeah, of course you are right, question 1b doesn't make sense as stated. I wrote it fast, sorry!
          $endgroup$
          – Bruce Wayne
          11 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179975%2feinstein-metrics-on-spheres%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          Bundesstraße 106

          Image
          Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück ...
          Read more

          Verónica Boquete

          Image
          Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl ...
          Read more

          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

          Image
          Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich ...
          Read more