Prove Lebesgue integrability












1












$begingroup$


Let $f_n in L_0(X), |f_n|leqslantphi in L_1(X), n in N$ and $f_n rightarrow f$ in measure. Prove that $f in L_1(X)$ and
$$lim_{ntoinfty}int_{X}{f_n}dmu = int_{X} fdmu$$



Here $L_0(X)$ stands for Lebesgue measurability, and $L_1(X)$ — for Lebesgue integrability on $X$.



As far as I understand, we should use the fact that $f_n$ is bounded by a Lebesgue integrable function being itself measurable, so $f$ is also Lebesgue integrable. Is that correct? I remember similar reasoning being used in the classroom.
If the first part is correct, how do I prove the equality?






measure-theory lebesgue-integral lebesgue-measure







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Let $f_n in L_0(X), |f_n|leqslantphi in L_1(X), n in N$ and $f_n rightarrow f$ in measure. Prove that $f in L_1(X)$ and
    $$lim_{ntoinfty}int_{X}{f_n}dmu = int_{X} fdmu$$



    Here $L_0(X)$ stands for Lebesgue measurability, and $L_1(X)$ — for Lebesgue integrability on $X$.



    As far as I understand, we should use the fact that $f_n$ is bounded by a Lebesgue integrable function being itself measurable, so $f$ is also Lebesgue integrable. Is that correct? I remember similar reasoning being used in the classroom.
    If the first part is correct, how do I prove the equality?






    measure-theory lebesgue-integral lebesgue-measure







    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Let $f_n in L_0(X), |f_n|leqslantphi in L_1(X), n in N$ and $f_n rightarrow f$ in measure. Prove that $f in L_1(X)$ and
      $$lim_{ntoinfty}int_{X}{f_n}dmu = int_{X} fdmu$$



      Here $L_0(X)$ stands for Lebesgue measurability, and $L_1(X)$ — for Lebesgue integrability on $X$.



      As far as I understand, we should use the fact that $f_n$ is bounded by a Lebesgue integrable function being itself measurable, so $f$ is also Lebesgue integrable. Is that correct? I remember similar reasoning being used in the classroom.
      If the first part is correct, how do I prove the equality?






      measure-theory lebesgue-integral lebesgue-measure







      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $f_n in L_0(X), |f_n|leqslantphi in L_1(X), n in N$ and $f_n rightarrow f$ in measure. Prove that $f in L_1(X)$ and
      $$lim_{ntoinfty}int_{X}{f_n}dmu = int_{X} fdmu$$



      Here $L_0(X)$ stands for Lebesgue measurability, and $L_1(X)$ — for Lebesgue integrability on $X$.



      As far as I understand, we should use the fact that $f_n$ is bounded by a Lebesgue integrable function being itself measurable, so $f$ is also Lebesgue integrable. Is that correct? I remember similar reasoning being used in the classroom.
      If the first part is correct, how do I prove the equality?






      measure-theory lebesgue-integral lebesgue-measure




      measure-theory lebesgue-integral lebesgue-measure






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 25 '18 at 16:17









      Don DraperDon Draper

      87110




      87110






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Let ${f_{n_k}}_{k=1}^infty$ be an arbitrary subsequence of ${f_n}_{n=1}^infty$. Then $f_{n_k} to f$ in measure, so one may extract a further subsequence ${f_{n_{k_j}}}_{j=1}^infty$ of ${f_{n_k}}_{k=1}^infty$ such that $f_{n_{k_j}}to f$ pointwise a.e. in $X$. By Fatou's lemma $fin L_1(X)$; by the dominated convergence theorem $int_X f, dmu = limlimits_{jto infty} int_X f_{n_{k_j}}, dmu$. Since ${f_{n_k}}_{k=1}^infty$ was arbitrary, the result follows.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Why does the result follow from $f_{n_k}$ being arbitrary?
            $endgroup$
            – Guacho Perez
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:29










          • $begingroup$
            @Gaucho If every subsequence of a sequence of real numbers converges to some number $A$, then the sequence converges to $A$. In this case, the sequence under consideration is $int_X f_n, dmu$.
            $endgroup$
            – kobe
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:30












          • $begingroup$
            But it is only proved that a subsequence of every subsequence converges to $int f$.
            $endgroup$
            – Guacho Perez
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:45










          • $begingroup$
            @GuachoPerez no, it has been shown that every subsequence of $int_X f_n, dmu$ has a further subsequence which converges to $int_X f, dmu$, so $int_X f_n, dmu to int_X f, dmu$. Indeed, since $int_X f_{n_j}, dmu$ has a subsequence which converges to $int_X f, dmu$, then $int_X f_{n_j}, dmu$ to converges to the same number. But since $int_X f_{n_j}, dmu$ is an arbitrary subsequence of $int_X f_n, dmu$, $lim_n int_X f_n, dmu = int_X f, dmu$.
            $endgroup$
            – kobe
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:53












          • $begingroup$
            @Gaucho take a look here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/397978/….
            $endgroup$
            – kobe
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:55












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052238%2fprove-lebesgue-integrability%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          Let ${f_{n_k}}_{k=1}^infty$ be an arbitrary subsequence of ${f_n}_{n=1}^infty$. Then $f_{n_k} to f$ in measure, so one may extract a further subsequence ${f_{n_{k_j}}}_{j=1}^infty$ of ${f_{n_k}}_{k=1}^infty$ such that $f_{n_{k_j}}to f$ pointwise a.e. in $X$. By Fatou's lemma $fin L_1(X)$; by the dominated convergence theorem $int_X f, dmu = limlimits_{jto infty} int_X f_{n_{k_j}}, dmu$. Since ${f_{n_k}}_{k=1}^infty$ was arbitrary, the result follows.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Why does the result follow from $f_{n_k}$ being arbitrary?
            $endgroup$
            – Guacho Perez
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:29










          • $begingroup$
            @Gaucho If every subsequence of a sequence of real numbers converges to some number $A$, then the sequence converges to $A$. In this case, the sequence under consideration is $int_X f_n, dmu$.
            $endgroup$
            – kobe
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:30












          • $begingroup$
            But it is only proved that a subsequence of every subsequence converges to $int f$.
            $endgroup$
            – Guacho Perez
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:45










          • $begingroup$
            @GuachoPerez no, it has been shown that every subsequence of $int_X f_n, dmu$ has a further subsequence which converges to $int_X f, dmu$, so $int_X f_n, dmu to int_X f, dmu$. Indeed, since $int_X f_{n_j}, dmu$ has a subsequence which converges to $int_X f, dmu$, then $int_X f_{n_j}, dmu$ to converges to the same number. But since $int_X f_{n_j}, dmu$ is an arbitrary subsequence of $int_X f_n, dmu$, $lim_n int_X f_n, dmu = int_X f, dmu$.
            $endgroup$
            – kobe
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:53












          • $begingroup$
            @Gaucho take a look here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/397978/….
            $endgroup$
            – kobe
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:55
















          2












          $begingroup$

          Let ${f_{n_k}}_{k=1}^infty$ be an arbitrary subsequence of ${f_n}_{n=1}^infty$. Then $f_{n_k} to f$ in measure, so one may extract a further subsequence ${f_{n_{k_j}}}_{j=1}^infty$ of ${f_{n_k}}_{k=1}^infty$ such that $f_{n_{k_j}}to f$ pointwise a.e. in $X$. By Fatou's lemma $fin L_1(X)$; by the dominated convergence theorem $int_X f, dmu = limlimits_{jto infty} int_X f_{n_{k_j}}, dmu$. Since ${f_{n_k}}_{k=1}^infty$ was arbitrary, the result follows.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Why does the result follow from $f_{n_k}$ being arbitrary?
            $endgroup$
            – Guacho Perez
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:29










          • $begingroup$
            @Gaucho If every subsequence of a sequence of real numbers converges to some number $A$, then the sequence converges to $A$. In this case, the sequence under consideration is $int_X f_n, dmu$.
            $endgroup$
            – kobe
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:30












          • $begingroup$
            But it is only proved that a subsequence of every subsequence converges to $int f$.
            $endgroup$
            – Guacho Perez
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:45










          • $begingroup$
            @GuachoPerez no, it has been shown that every subsequence of $int_X f_n, dmu$ has a further subsequence which converges to $int_X f, dmu$, so $int_X f_n, dmu to int_X f, dmu$. Indeed, since $int_X f_{n_j}, dmu$ has a subsequence which converges to $int_X f, dmu$, then $int_X f_{n_j}, dmu$ to converges to the same number. But since $int_X f_{n_j}, dmu$ is an arbitrary subsequence of $int_X f_n, dmu$, $lim_n int_X f_n, dmu = int_X f, dmu$.
            $endgroup$
            – kobe
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:53












          • $begingroup$
            @Gaucho take a look here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/397978/….
            $endgroup$
            – kobe
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:55














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          Let ${f_{n_k}}_{k=1}^infty$ be an arbitrary subsequence of ${f_n}_{n=1}^infty$. Then $f_{n_k} to f$ in measure, so one may extract a further subsequence ${f_{n_{k_j}}}_{j=1}^infty$ of ${f_{n_k}}_{k=1}^infty$ such that $f_{n_{k_j}}to f$ pointwise a.e. in $X$. By Fatou's lemma $fin L_1(X)$; by the dominated convergence theorem $int_X f, dmu = limlimits_{jto infty} int_X f_{n_{k_j}}, dmu$. Since ${f_{n_k}}_{k=1}^infty$ was arbitrary, the result follows.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Let ${f_{n_k}}_{k=1}^infty$ be an arbitrary subsequence of ${f_n}_{n=1}^infty$. Then $f_{n_k} to f$ in measure, so one may extract a further subsequence ${f_{n_{k_j}}}_{j=1}^infty$ of ${f_{n_k}}_{k=1}^infty$ such that $f_{n_{k_j}}to f$ pointwise a.e. in $X$. By Fatou's lemma $fin L_1(X)$; by the dominated convergence theorem $int_X f, dmu = limlimits_{jto infty} int_X f_{n_{k_j}}, dmu$. Since ${f_{n_k}}_{k=1}^infty$ was arbitrary, the result follows.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 25 '18 at 17:21









          kobekobe

          35.1k22248




          35.1k22248












          • $begingroup$
            Why does the result follow from $f_{n_k}$ being arbitrary?
            $endgroup$
            – Guacho Perez
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:29










          • $begingroup$
            @Gaucho If every subsequence of a sequence of real numbers converges to some number $A$, then the sequence converges to $A$. In this case, the sequence under consideration is $int_X f_n, dmu$.
            $endgroup$
            – kobe
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:30












          • $begingroup$
            But it is only proved that a subsequence of every subsequence converges to $int f$.
            $endgroup$
            – Guacho Perez
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:45










          • $begingroup$
            @GuachoPerez no, it has been shown that every subsequence of $int_X f_n, dmu$ has a further subsequence which converges to $int_X f, dmu$, so $int_X f_n, dmu to int_X f, dmu$. Indeed, since $int_X f_{n_j}, dmu$ has a subsequence which converges to $int_X f, dmu$, then $int_X f_{n_j}, dmu$ to converges to the same number. But since $int_X f_{n_j}, dmu$ is an arbitrary subsequence of $int_X f_n, dmu$, $lim_n int_X f_n, dmu = int_X f, dmu$.
            $endgroup$
            – kobe
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:53












          • $begingroup$
            @Gaucho take a look here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/397978/….
            $endgroup$
            – kobe
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:55


















          • $begingroup$
            Why does the result follow from $f_{n_k}$ being arbitrary?
            $endgroup$
            – Guacho Perez
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:29










          • $begingroup$
            @Gaucho If every subsequence of a sequence of real numbers converges to some number $A$, then the sequence converges to $A$. In this case, the sequence under consideration is $int_X f_n, dmu$.
            $endgroup$
            – kobe
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:30












          • $begingroup$
            But it is only proved that a subsequence of every subsequence converges to $int f$.
            $endgroup$
            – Guacho Perez
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:45










          • $begingroup$
            @GuachoPerez no, it has been shown that every subsequence of $int_X f_n, dmu$ has a further subsequence which converges to $int_X f, dmu$, so $int_X f_n, dmu to int_X f, dmu$. Indeed, since $int_X f_{n_j}, dmu$ has a subsequence which converges to $int_X f, dmu$, then $int_X f_{n_j}, dmu$ to converges to the same number. But since $int_X f_{n_j}, dmu$ is an arbitrary subsequence of $int_X f_n, dmu$, $lim_n int_X f_n, dmu = int_X f, dmu$.
            $endgroup$
            – kobe
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:53












          • $begingroup$
            @Gaucho take a look here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/397978/….
            $endgroup$
            – kobe
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:55
















          $begingroup$
          Why does the result follow from $f_{n_k}$ being arbitrary?
          $endgroup$
          – Guacho Perez
          Dec 25 '18 at 19:29




          $begingroup$
          Why does the result follow from $f_{n_k}$ being arbitrary?
          $endgroup$
          – Guacho Perez
          Dec 25 '18 at 19:29












          $begingroup$
          @Gaucho If every subsequence of a sequence of real numbers converges to some number $A$, then the sequence converges to $A$. In this case, the sequence under consideration is $int_X f_n, dmu$.
          $endgroup$
          – kobe
          Dec 25 '18 at 19:30






          $begingroup$
          @Gaucho If every subsequence of a sequence of real numbers converges to some number $A$, then the sequence converges to $A$. In this case, the sequence under consideration is $int_X f_n, dmu$.
          $endgroup$
          – kobe
          Dec 25 '18 at 19:30














          $begingroup$
          But it is only proved that a subsequence of every subsequence converges to $int f$.
          $endgroup$
          – Guacho Perez
          Dec 25 '18 at 19:45




          $begingroup$
          But it is only proved that a subsequence of every subsequence converges to $int f$.
          $endgroup$
          – Guacho Perez
          Dec 25 '18 at 19:45












          $begingroup$
          @GuachoPerez no, it has been shown that every subsequence of $int_X f_n, dmu$ has a further subsequence which converges to $int_X f, dmu$, so $int_X f_n, dmu to int_X f, dmu$. Indeed, since $int_X f_{n_j}, dmu$ has a subsequence which converges to $int_X f, dmu$, then $int_X f_{n_j}, dmu$ to converges to the same number. But since $int_X f_{n_j}, dmu$ is an arbitrary subsequence of $int_X f_n, dmu$, $lim_n int_X f_n, dmu = int_X f, dmu$.
          $endgroup$
          – kobe
          Dec 25 '18 at 19:53






          $begingroup$
          @GuachoPerez no, it has been shown that every subsequence of $int_X f_n, dmu$ has a further subsequence which converges to $int_X f, dmu$, so $int_X f_n, dmu to int_X f, dmu$. Indeed, since $int_X f_{n_j}, dmu$ has a subsequence which converges to $int_X f, dmu$, then $int_X f_{n_j}, dmu$ to converges to the same number. But since $int_X f_{n_j}, dmu$ is an arbitrary subsequence of $int_X f_n, dmu$, $lim_n int_X f_n, dmu = int_X f, dmu$.
          $endgroup$
          – kobe
          Dec 25 '18 at 19:53














          $begingroup$
          @Gaucho take a look here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/397978/….
          $endgroup$
          – kobe
          Dec 25 '18 at 19:55




          $begingroup$
          @Gaucho take a look here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/397978/….
          $endgroup$
          – kobe
          Dec 25 '18 at 19:55


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052238%2fprove-lebesgue-integrability%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          Bundesstraße 106

          Image
          Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück
          Read more

          Verónica Boquete

          Image
          Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl
          Read more

          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

          Image
          Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich
          Read more