Scaling and rotating a square so that it is inscribed in the original square












10












$begingroup$


I have a square with a side length of 100 cm. I then want to rotate a square clockwise by ten degrees so that it is scaled and contained inside the existing square.



The image below is what I'm attempting, but with a square, not a triangle. (Image created by Alain Matthes).



not my square



And here is the square I'm trying to create, so hopefully this helps:
my square



So my question, how do I determine the distance between the original point and the rotated point? Or, how do I determine the location of the rotated point on its own, independent of the original square? I'm not sure what formula I would use in either instance.



Any assistance in this endeavor would be greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I've already drawn what I'm trying to achieve. what is the normal server used by users who want to upload their own images for this site? thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – jb3330421
    Jan 7 '15 at 22:57










  • $begingroup$
    From what I can tell, you can choose to just add image and it will give you the option of uploading one from your own computer.
    $endgroup$
    – Johanna
    Jan 7 '15 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    yeah i found somewhere to upload it, thanks much
    $endgroup$
    – jb3330421
    Jan 7 '15 at 23:18
















10












$begingroup$


I have a square with a side length of 100 cm. I then want to rotate a square clockwise by ten degrees so that it is scaled and contained inside the existing square.



The image below is what I'm attempting, but with a square, not a triangle. (Image created by Alain Matthes).



not my square



And here is the square I'm trying to create, so hopefully this helps:
my square



So my question, how do I determine the distance between the original point and the rotated point? Or, how do I determine the location of the rotated point on its own, independent of the original square? I'm not sure what formula I would use in either instance.



Any assistance in this endeavor would be greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I've already drawn what I'm trying to achieve. what is the normal server used by users who want to upload their own images for this site? thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – jb3330421
    Jan 7 '15 at 22:57










  • $begingroup$
    From what I can tell, you can choose to just add image and it will give you the option of uploading one from your own computer.
    $endgroup$
    – Johanna
    Jan 7 '15 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    yeah i found somewhere to upload it, thanks much
    $endgroup$
    – jb3330421
    Jan 7 '15 at 23:18














10












10








10


4



$begingroup$


I have a square with a side length of 100 cm. I then want to rotate a square clockwise by ten degrees so that it is scaled and contained inside the existing square.



The image below is what I'm attempting, but with a square, not a triangle. (Image created by Alain Matthes).



not my square



And here is the square I'm trying to create, so hopefully this helps:
my square



So my question, how do I determine the distance between the original point and the rotated point? Or, how do I determine the location of the rotated point on its own, independent of the original square? I'm not sure what formula I would use in either instance.



Any assistance in this endeavor would be greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have a square with a side length of 100 cm. I then want to rotate a square clockwise by ten degrees so that it is scaled and contained inside the existing square.



The image below is what I'm attempting, but with a square, not a triangle. (Image created by Alain Matthes).



not my square



And here is the square I'm trying to create, so hopefully this helps:
my square



So my question, how do I determine the distance between the original point and the rotated point? Or, how do I determine the location of the rotated point on its own, independent of the original square? I'm not sure what formula I would use in either instance.



Any assistance in this endeavor would be greatly appreciated.







geometry euclidean-geometry rotations polygons art






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 24 '18 at 9:03









Glorfindel

3,41381830




3,41381830










asked Jan 7 '15 at 22:43









jb3330421jb3330421

515




515












  • $begingroup$
    I've already drawn what I'm trying to achieve. what is the normal server used by users who want to upload their own images for this site? thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – jb3330421
    Jan 7 '15 at 22:57










  • $begingroup$
    From what I can tell, you can choose to just add image and it will give you the option of uploading one from your own computer.
    $endgroup$
    – Johanna
    Jan 7 '15 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    yeah i found somewhere to upload it, thanks much
    $endgroup$
    – jb3330421
    Jan 7 '15 at 23:18


















  • $begingroup$
    I've already drawn what I'm trying to achieve. what is the normal server used by users who want to upload their own images for this site? thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – jb3330421
    Jan 7 '15 at 22:57










  • $begingroup$
    From what I can tell, you can choose to just add image and it will give you the option of uploading one from your own computer.
    $endgroup$
    – Johanna
    Jan 7 '15 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    yeah i found somewhere to upload it, thanks much
    $endgroup$
    – jb3330421
    Jan 7 '15 at 23:18
















$begingroup$
I've already drawn what I'm trying to achieve. what is the normal server used by users who want to upload their own images for this site? thanks.
$endgroup$
– jb3330421
Jan 7 '15 at 22:57




$begingroup$
I've already drawn what I'm trying to achieve. what is the normal server used by users who want to upload their own images for this site? thanks.
$endgroup$
– jb3330421
Jan 7 '15 at 22:57












$begingroup$
From what I can tell, you can choose to just add image and it will give you the option of uploading one from your own computer.
$endgroup$
– Johanna
Jan 7 '15 at 23:06




$begingroup$
From what I can tell, you can choose to just add image and it will give you the option of uploading one from your own computer.
$endgroup$
– Johanna
Jan 7 '15 at 23:06












$begingroup$
yeah i found somewhere to upload it, thanks much
$endgroup$
– jb3330421
Jan 7 '15 at 23:18




$begingroup$
yeah i found somewhere to upload it, thanks much
$endgroup$
– jb3330421
Jan 7 '15 at 23:18










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















11












$begingroup$

A more general approach is given as follows. Suppose we have the points $$zeta_{n,0}^k = left( cos frac{2pi k}{n}, sin frac{2pi k}{n} right), quad k = 0, 1, 2, ldots, n-1$$ forming a regular $n$-gon with unit circumradius in the Cartesian coordinate plane. We seek a linear transformation $T$ that maps $zeta_{n,0}^k$ to a point $zeta_{n,1}^k$ that satisfies the following properties: $$begin{align*} zeta_{n,1}^k &= T(zeta_{n,0}^k) = (1-lambda) zeta_{n,0}^k + lambda zeta_{n,0}^{overline{k+1}}, \ T(0,0) &= (0,0), end{align*}$$ for each such $k$, where $overline{k+1}$ is the remainder of $k+1$ divided by $n$. Here, $lambda in (0,1)$ is a fixed constant. This suggests a rotation by some angle $theta$ and scaling by $s$ will work: i.e., $$T(x,y) = begin{bmatrix}s cos theta & -s sin theta \ s sin theta & s cos theta end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix} x \ y end{bmatrix}$$ or if we want to use complex numbers as suggested by our choice of $zeta$, $$T(z) = se^{itheta}zeta_{n,0}^k = se^{itheta}e^{2pi i k/n} = se^{i(2pi k/n + theta)} = (1-lambda)e^{2pi i k/n} + lambda e^{2pi i (k+1)/n}.$$ Equivalently, $$se^{itheta} = 1 + lambda(zeta_{n,0} - 1).$$ Solving for $s$ and $theta$ in terms of $lambda$, we obtain $$s = sqrt{Bigl(1 - lambda + lambda cos frac{2pi}{n}Bigr)^2 + lambda^2 sin^2 frac{2pi}{n}} = sqrt{1 - 2lambda + 2lambda^2 + 2lambda(1-lambda) cos frac{2pi}{n}},$$ $$theta = tan^{-1} frac{sin frac{2pi}{n}}{frac{1}{lambda} - 1 + cos frac{2pi}{n}}.$$ The resulting rotation matrix then has the form $$T = begin{bmatrix} 1 - lambda + lambda cos frac{2pi}{n} & -lambda sin frac{2pi}{n} \ lambda sin frac{2pi}{n} & 1 - lambda + lambda cos frac{2pi}{n} end{bmatrix}.$$ Subsequent iterations of $T$ will produce nested $n$-gons with vertices $$T^m(zeta_{n,0}^k) = zeta_{n,m}^k.$$



Below is a rather primitive implementation of the above in Mathematica, for $n = 7$ and gradually incrementing $lambda in [0.05, 0.95]$:



enter image description here






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    6












    $begingroup$

    Let's say your original 4 points are, going counterclockwise from the origin, $$(0,0),(100,0),(100,100),(0,100)$$



    enter image description here



    You want to rotate clockwise, which means the point that was on the origin will go up to $(0,a)$ and the point that was at $(0,100)$ will go to $(a,100)$. And if you draw out this new situation with all 4 little wedges filling in the space between your new square and the old, you can make triangles with a small leg of $a$ and a long leg of $b$ and you see that $a+b=100$.



    So you have a system of two equations and two unknowns.
    $$a+b=100\tan(10^{circ})=frac{a}{b}$$



    This gives $aapprox14.99$. Your new 4 points will be
    $$(0,14.99),(85.01,0),(100,85.01),(14.99,100)$$



    Additionally, each side length was scaled by $0.8632$



    EDIT: How to solve the system without a calculator solve() function.




    1. Find a numerical value of $tan(10^{circ})$. It is $0.1763$

    2. Solve the first equation in terms of $a$ so $a=100-b$

    3. Solve $0.1763=(100-b)/b$ or $0.1763b=100-b\1.1763b=100\b=100/1.1763\b=85.01$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thank you for this. So forgive my ignorance, but how did you solve for a with those two equations? I have tan at .176, but how did you know a is 14.99. thanks again.
      $endgroup$
      – jb3330421
      Jan 7 '15 at 23:46












    • $begingroup$
      Ha, i used a calculator :). I'll edit my answer to show how to do it without a solver...
      $endgroup$
      – turkeyhundt
      Jan 7 '15 at 23:47










    • $begingroup$
      great, thank you, i appreciate it.
      $endgroup$
      – jb3330421
      Jan 7 '15 at 23:50










    • $begingroup$
      This is fantastic, thanks for your help. This is my first time using this site. What an amazing resource for math idiots like myself.
      $endgroup$
      – jb3330421
      Jan 7 '15 at 23:56










    • $begingroup$
      Sorry, now my last question: when you add b to both sides, how come .01763 becomes 1.1763, and not .01763b +b? Did I miss something there?
      $endgroup$
      – jb3330421
      Jan 7 '15 at 23:58



















    1












    $begingroup$

    You have two correct answers already.
    What I would like to do is to put the solution in terms that you can
    very easily apply to your problem, that is, I want to give you a simple formula
    to directly compute the coordinates of each vertex of each square.



    Let's take polar coordinates with the origin at the center of the square, so that the large square in your diagram has vertices at
    $(r_0,0)$, $left(r_0,fracpi2right)$, $(r_0,pi)$, $left(r_0,-fracpi2right)$
    where $r_0$ is a positive constant determined by how large you want that square to be.



    Now we rotate $delta$ radians to the right and shrink the square so that the new
    square's vertices lie on the old square's edges.
    (For a $10^circ$ rotation, you want $delta = frac{pi}{180} cdot 10.$)
    Then the origin, one vertex of the original square, and the corresponding vertex of
    the new square make a triangle with angle $delta$ at the origin, $fracpi4$ ($45^circ$)
    at the original square's vertex, and $frac{3pi}{4}-delta$ at the new square's vertex.
    Let $r_1$ be the distance from the origin to the new square's vertex.
    By the law of sines,
    $$ frac{r_1}{sin left(frac{pi}{4}right)}
    = frac{r_0}{sin left(frac{3pi}{4}-deltaright)}.$$
    Therefore
    $$r_1 = frac{sin left(frac{pi}{4}right)}{sin left(frac{3pi}{4}-deltaright)} r_0
    = frac{sin left(frac{pi}{4}right)}{sin left(frac{pi}{4}+deltaright)} r_0.$$
    Let
    $$rho = frac{sin left(frac{pi}{4}right)}{sin left(frac{pi}{4}+deltaright)}$$
    so that $r_1 = rho, r_0.$
    For an angle of $10^circ,$ a little computation shows that $rho approx 0.86321799,$
    that is,
    $$r_1 approx 0.86321799, r_0.$$
    Checking this against the calculations by @turkeyhundt for the $10$-degree rotation,
    we should find that $0.86321799 approx frac{sqrt{a^2+b^2}}{100},$
    and indeed for $b = 85.01,$ $a=100-b$ that is what we find.



    Now observe that in general, if $r_n$ is the distance from the origin to a vertex
    of the $n$th square, then $r_{n+1} = rho, r_n.$
    Also, if $alpha$ is the direction from the origin to a vertex of the $n$th square,
    then the direction from the origin to a vertex of the $n+1$st square is
    $alpha-delta$ (because polar coordinates measure angles counterclockwise
    and we are rotating clockwise).
    Putting these facts together, the vertices of the $n$th square
    have polar coordinates
    $$
    (rho^n r_0,; -ndelta),\
    left(rho^n r_0,; fracpi2-ndeltaright)!,\
    (rho^n r_0,; pi-ndelta),\
    left(rho^n r_0,; -fracpi2-ndeltaright)!.
    $$
    To plot these in Cartesian coordinates, convert the $(r,theta)$ coordinates
    of each vertex of each square to $(x,y)$ coordinate by the usual
    transformation, $x=rcostheta$ and $y=rsintheta.$
    For example, one vertex of the $n$th square will have Cartesian coordinates
    $(rho^n r_0 cos(-ndelta), rho^n r_0 sin(-ndelta)),$ and for the other
    three you simply add a multiple of $fracpi2$ to the angle.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$














      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1095827%2fscaling-and-rotating-a-square-so-that-it-is-inscribed-in-the-original-square%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      11












      $begingroup$

      A more general approach is given as follows. Suppose we have the points $$zeta_{n,0}^k = left( cos frac{2pi k}{n}, sin frac{2pi k}{n} right), quad k = 0, 1, 2, ldots, n-1$$ forming a regular $n$-gon with unit circumradius in the Cartesian coordinate plane. We seek a linear transformation $T$ that maps $zeta_{n,0}^k$ to a point $zeta_{n,1}^k$ that satisfies the following properties: $$begin{align*} zeta_{n,1}^k &= T(zeta_{n,0}^k) = (1-lambda) zeta_{n,0}^k + lambda zeta_{n,0}^{overline{k+1}}, \ T(0,0) &= (0,0), end{align*}$$ for each such $k$, where $overline{k+1}$ is the remainder of $k+1$ divided by $n$. Here, $lambda in (0,1)$ is a fixed constant. This suggests a rotation by some angle $theta$ and scaling by $s$ will work: i.e., $$T(x,y) = begin{bmatrix}s cos theta & -s sin theta \ s sin theta & s cos theta end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix} x \ y end{bmatrix}$$ or if we want to use complex numbers as suggested by our choice of $zeta$, $$T(z) = se^{itheta}zeta_{n,0}^k = se^{itheta}e^{2pi i k/n} = se^{i(2pi k/n + theta)} = (1-lambda)e^{2pi i k/n} + lambda e^{2pi i (k+1)/n}.$$ Equivalently, $$se^{itheta} = 1 + lambda(zeta_{n,0} - 1).$$ Solving for $s$ and $theta$ in terms of $lambda$, we obtain $$s = sqrt{Bigl(1 - lambda + lambda cos frac{2pi}{n}Bigr)^2 + lambda^2 sin^2 frac{2pi}{n}} = sqrt{1 - 2lambda + 2lambda^2 + 2lambda(1-lambda) cos frac{2pi}{n}},$$ $$theta = tan^{-1} frac{sin frac{2pi}{n}}{frac{1}{lambda} - 1 + cos frac{2pi}{n}}.$$ The resulting rotation matrix then has the form $$T = begin{bmatrix} 1 - lambda + lambda cos frac{2pi}{n} & -lambda sin frac{2pi}{n} \ lambda sin frac{2pi}{n} & 1 - lambda + lambda cos frac{2pi}{n} end{bmatrix}.$$ Subsequent iterations of $T$ will produce nested $n$-gons with vertices $$T^m(zeta_{n,0}^k) = zeta_{n,m}^k.$$



      Below is a rather primitive implementation of the above in Mathematica, for $n = 7$ and gradually incrementing $lambda in [0.05, 0.95]$:



      enter image description here






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        11












        $begingroup$

        A more general approach is given as follows. Suppose we have the points $$zeta_{n,0}^k = left( cos frac{2pi k}{n}, sin frac{2pi k}{n} right), quad k = 0, 1, 2, ldots, n-1$$ forming a regular $n$-gon with unit circumradius in the Cartesian coordinate plane. We seek a linear transformation $T$ that maps $zeta_{n,0}^k$ to a point $zeta_{n,1}^k$ that satisfies the following properties: $$begin{align*} zeta_{n,1}^k &= T(zeta_{n,0}^k) = (1-lambda) zeta_{n,0}^k + lambda zeta_{n,0}^{overline{k+1}}, \ T(0,0) &= (0,0), end{align*}$$ for each such $k$, where $overline{k+1}$ is the remainder of $k+1$ divided by $n$. Here, $lambda in (0,1)$ is a fixed constant. This suggests a rotation by some angle $theta$ and scaling by $s$ will work: i.e., $$T(x,y) = begin{bmatrix}s cos theta & -s sin theta \ s sin theta & s cos theta end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix} x \ y end{bmatrix}$$ or if we want to use complex numbers as suggested by our choice of $zeta$, $$T(z) = se^{itheta}zeta_{n,0}^k = se^{itheta}e^{2pi i k/n} = se^{i(2pi k/n + theta)} = (1-lambda)e^{2pi i k/n} + lambda e^{2pi i (k+1)/n}.$$ Equivalently, $$se^{itheta} = 1 + lambda(zeta_{n,0} - 1).$$ Solving for $s$ and $theta$ in terms of $lambda$, we obtain $$s = sqrt{Bigl(1 - lambda + lambda cos frac{2pi}{n}Bigr)^2 + lambda^2 sin^2 frac{2pi}{n}} = sqrt{1 - 2lambda + 2lambda^2 + 2lambda(1-lambda) cos frac{2pi}{n}},$$ $$theta = tan^{-1} frac{sin frac{2pi}{n}}{frac{1}{lambda} - 1 + cos frac{2pi}{n}}.$$ The resulting rotation matrix then has the form $$T = begin{bmatrix} 1 - lambda + lambda cos frac{2pi}{n} & -lambda sin frac{2pi}{n} \ lambda sin frac{2pi}{n} & 1 - lambda + lambda cos frac{2pi}{n} end{bmatrix}.$$ Subsequent iterations of $T$ will produce nested $n$-gons with vertices $$T^m(zeta_{n,0}^k) = zeta_{n,m}^k.$$



        Below is a rather primitive implementation of the above in Mathematica, for $n = 7$ and gradually incrementing $lambda in [0.05, 0.95]$:



        enter image description here






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          11












          11








          11





          $begingroup$

          A more general approach is given as follows. Suppose we have the points $$zeta_{n,0}^k = left( cos frac{2pi k}{n}, sin frac{2pi k}{n} right), quad k = 0, 1, 2, ldots, n-1$$ forming a regular $n$-gon with unit circumradius in the Cartesian coordinate plane. We seek a linear transformation $T$ that maps $zeta_{n,0}^k$ to a point $zeta_{n,1}^k$ that satisfies the following properties: $$begin{align*} zeta_{n,1}^k &= T(zeta_{n,0}^k) = (1-lambda) zeta_{n,0}^k + lambda zeta_{n,0}^{overline{k+1}}, \ T(0,0) &= (0,0), end{align*}$$ for each such $k$, where $overline{k+1}$ is the remainder of $k+1$ divided by $n$. Here, $lambda in (0,1)$ is a fixed constant. This suggests a rotation by some angle $theta$ and scaling by $s$ will work: i.e., $$T(x,y) = begin{bmatrix}s cos theta & -s sin theta \ s sin theta & s cos theta end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix} x \ y end{bmatrix}$$ or if we want to use complex numbers as suggested by our choice of $zeta$, $$T(z) = se^{itheta}zeta_{n,0}^k = se^{itheta}e^{2pi i k/n} = se^{i(2pi k/n + theta)} = (1-lambda)e^{2pi i k/n} + lambda e^{2pi i (k+1)/n}.$$ Equivalently, $$se^{itheta} = 1 + lambda(zeta_{n,0} - 1).$$ Solving for $s$ and $theta$ in terms of $lambda$, we obtain $$s = sqrt{Bigl(1 - lambda + lambda cos frac{2pi}{n}Bigr)^2 + lambda^2 sin^2 frac{2pi}{n}} = sqrt{1 - 2lambda + 2lambda^2 + 2lambda(1-lambda) cos frac{2pi}{n}},$$ $$theta = tan^{-1} frac{sin frac{2pi}{n}}{frac{1}{lambda} - 1 + cos frac{2pi}{n}}.$$ The resulting rotation matrix then has the form $$T = begin{bmatrix} 1 - lambda + lambda cos frac{2pi}{n} & -lambda sin frac{2pi}{n} \ lambda sin frac{2pi}{n} & 1 - lambda + lambda cos frac{2pi}{n} end{bmatrix}.$$ Subsequent iterations of $T$ will produce nested $n$-gons with vertices $$T^m(zeta_{n,0}^k) = zeta_{n,m}^k.$$



          Below is a rather primitive implementation of the above in Mathematica, for $n = 7$ and gradually incrementing $lambda in [0.05, 0.95]$:



          enter image description here






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          A more general approach is given as follows. Suppose we have the points $$zeta_{n,0}^k = left( cos frac{2pi k}{n}, sin frac{2pi k}{n} right), quad k = 0, 1, 2, ldots, n-1$$ forming a regular $n$-gon with unit circumradius in the Cartesian coordinate plane. We seek a linear transformation $T$ that maps $zeta_{n,0}^k$ to a point $zeta_{n,1}^k$ that satisfies the following properties: $$begin{align*} zeta_{n,1}^k &= T(zeta_{n,0}^k) = (1-lambda) zeta_{n,0}^k + lambda zeta_{n,0}^{overline{k+1}}, \ T(0,0) &= (0,0), end{align*}$$ for each such $k$, where $overline{k+1}$ is the remainder of $k+1$ divided by $n$. Here, $lambda in (0,1)$ is a fixed constant. This suggests a rotation by some angle $theta$ and scaling by $s$ will work: i.e., $$T(x,y) = begin{bmatrix}s cos theta & -s sin theta \ s sin theta & s cos theta end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix} x \ y end{bmatrix}$$ or if we want to use complex numbers as suggested by our choice of $zeta$, $$T(z) = se^{itheta}zeta_{n,0}^k = se^{itheta}e^{2pi i k/n} = se^{i(2pi k/n + theta)} = (1-lambda)e^{2pi i k/n} + lambda e^{2pi i (k+1)/n}.$$ Equivalently, $$se^{itheta} = 1 + lambda(zeta_{n,0} - 1).$$ Solving for $s$ and $theta$ in terms of $lambda$, we obtain $$s = sqrt{Bigl(1 - lambda + lambda cos frac{2pi}{n}Bigr)^2 + lambda^2 sin^2 frac{2pi}{n}} = sqrt{1 - 2lambda + 2lambda^2 + 2lambda(1-lambda) cos frac{2pi}{n}},$$ $$theta = tan^{-1} frac{sin frac{2pi}{n}}{frac{1}{lambda} - 1 + cos frac{2pi}{n}}.$$ The resulting rotation matrix then has the form $$T = begin{bmatrix} 1 - lambda + lambda cos frac{2pi}{n} & -lambda sin frac{2pi}{n} \ lambda sin frac{2pi}{n} & 1 - lambda + lambda cos frac{2pi}{n} end{bmatrix}.$$ Subsequent iterations of $T$ will produce nested $n$-gons with vertices $$T^m(zeta_{n,0}^k) = zeta_{n,m}^k.$$



          Below is a rather primitive implementation of the above in Mathematica, for $n = 7$ and gradually incrementing $lambda in [0.05, 0.95]$:



          enter image description here







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 8 '15 at 0:15

























          answered Jan 8 '15 at 0:07









          heropupheropup

          65.1k865104




          65.1k865104























              6












              $begingroup$

              Let's say your original 4 points are, going counterclockwise from the origin, $$(0,0),(100,0),(100,100),(0,100)$$



              enter image description here



              You want to rotate clockwise, which means the point that was on the origin will go up to $(0,a)$ and the point that was at $(0,100)$ will go to $(a,100)$. And if you draw out this new situation with all 4 little wedges filling in the space between your new square and the old, you can make triangles with a small leg of $a$ and a long leg of $b$ and you see that $a+b=100$.



              So you have a system of two equations and two unknowns.
              $$a+b=100\tan(10^{circ})=frac{a}{b}$$



              This gives $aapprox14.99$. Your new 4 points will be
              $$(0,14.99),(85.01,0),(100,85.01),(14.99,100)$$



              Additionally, each side length was scaled by $0.8632$



              EDIT: How to solve the system without a calculator solve() function.




              1. Find a numerical value of $tan(10^{circ})$. It is $0.1763$

              2. Solve the first equation in terms of $a$ so $a=100-b$

              3. Solve $0.1763=(100-b)/b$ or $0.1763b=100-b\1.1763b=100\b=100/1.1763\b=85.01$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                Thank you for this. So forgive my ignorance, but how did you solve for a with those two equations? I have tan at .176, but how did you know a is 14.99. thanks again.
                $endgroup$
                – jb3330421
                Jan 7 '15 at 23:46












              • $begingroup$
                Ha, i used a calculator :). I'll edit my answer to show how to do it without a solver...
                $endgroup$
                – turkeyhundt
                Jan 7 '15 at 23:47










              • $begingroup$
                great, thank you, i appreciate it.
                $endgroup$
                – jb3330421
                Jan 7 '15 at 23:50










              • $begingroup$
                This is fantastic, thanks for your help. This is my first time using this site. What an amazing resource for math idiots like myself.
                $endgroup$
                – jb3330421
                Jan 7 '15 at 23:56










              • $begingroup$
                Sorry, now my last question: when you add b to both sides, how come .01763 becomes 1.1763, and not .01763b +b? Did I miss something there?
                $endgroup$
                – jb3330421
                Jan 7 '15 at 23:58
















              6












              $begingroup$

              Let's say your original 4 points are, going counterclockwise from the origin, $$(0,0),(100,0),(100,100),(0,100)$$



              enter image description here



              You want to rotate clockwise, which means the point that was on the origin will go up to $(0,a)$ and the point that was at $(0,100)$ will go to $(a,100)$. And if you draw out this new situation with all 4 little wedges filling in the space between your new square and the old, you can make triangles with a small leg of $a$ and a long leg of $b$ and you see that $a+b=100$.



              So you have a system of two equations and two unknowns.
              $$a+b=100\tan(10^{circ})=frac{a}{b}$$



              This gives $aapprox14.99$. Your new 4 points will be
              $$(0,14.99),(85.01,0),(100,85.01),(14.99,100)$$



              Additionally, each side length was scaled by $0.8632$



              EDIT: How to solve the system without a calculator solve() function.




              1. Find a numerical value of $tan(10^{circ})$. It is $0.1763$

              2. Solve the first equation in terms of $a$ so $a=100-b$

              3. Solve $0.1763=(100-b)/b$ or $0.1763b=100-b\1.1763b=100\b=100/1.1763\b=85.01$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                Thank you for this. So forgive my ignorance, but how did you solve for a with those two equations? I have tan at .176, but how did you know a is 14.99. thanks again.
                $endgroup$
                – jb3330421
                Jan 7 '15 at 23:46












              • $begingroup$
                Ha, i used a calculator :). I'll edit my answer to show how to do it without a solver...
                $endgroup$
                – turkeyhundt
                Jan 7 '15 at 23:47










              • $begingroup$
                great, thank you, i appreciate it.
                $endgroup$
                – jb3330421
                Jan 7 '15 at 23:50










              • $begingroup$
                This is fantastic, thanks for your help. This is my first time using this site. What an amazing resource for math idiots like myself.
                $endgroup$
                – jb3330421
                Jan 7 '15 at 23:56










              • $begingroup$
                Sorry, now my last question: when you add b to both sides, how come .01763 becomes 1.1763, and not .01763b +b? Did I miss something there?
                $endgroup$
                – jb3330421
                Jan 7 '15 at 23:58














              6












              6








              6





              $begingroup$

              Let's say your original 4 points are, going counterclockwise from the origin, $$(0,0),(100,0),(100,100),(0,100)$$



              enter image description here



              You want to rotate clockwise, which means the point that was on the origin will go up to $(0,a)$ and the point that was at $(0,100)$ will go to $(a,100)$. And if you draw out this new situation with all 4 little wedges filling in the space between your new square and the old, you can make triangles with a small leg of $a$ and a long leg of $b$ and you see that $a+b=100$.



              So you have a system of two equations and two unknowns.
              $$a+b=100\tan(10^{circ})=frac{a}{b}$$



              This gives $aapprox14.99$. Your new 4 points will be
              $$(0,14.99),(85.01,0),(100,85.01),(14.99,100)$$



              Additionally, each side length was scaled by $0.8632$



              EDIT: How to solve the system without a calculator solve() function.




              1. Find a numerical value of $tan(10^{circ})$. It is $0.1763$

              2. Solve the first equation in terms of $a$ so $a=100-b$

              3. Solve $0.1763=(100-b)/b$ or $0.1763b=100-b\1.1763b=100\b=100/1.1763\b=85.01$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              Let's say your original 4 points are, going counterclockwise from the origin, $$(0,0),(100,0),(100,100),(0,100)$$



              enter image description here



              You want to rotate clockwise, which means the point that was on the origin will go up to $(0,a)$ and the point that was at $(0,100)$ will go to $(a,100)$. And if you draw out this new situation with all 4 little wedges filling in the space between your new square and the old, you can make triangles with a small leg of $a$ and a long leg of $b$ and you see that $a+b=100$.



              So you have a system of two equations and two unknowns.
              $$a+b=100\tan(10^{circ})=frac{a}{b}$$



              This gives $aapprox14.99$. Your new 4 points will be
              $$(0,14.99),(85.01,0),(100,85.01),(14.99,100)$$



              Additionally, each side length was scaled by $0.8632$



              EDIT: How to solve the system without a calculator solve() function.




              1. Find a numerical value of $tan(10^{circ})$. It is $0.1763$

              2. Solve the first equation in terms of $a$ so $a=100-b$

              3. Solve $0.1763=(100-b)/b$ or $0.1763b=100-b\1.1763b=100\b=100/1.1763\b=85.01$







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited Jan 7 '15 at 23:51

























              answered Jan 7 '15 at 23:13









              turkeyhundtturkeyhundt

              6,85511025




              6,85511025












              • $begingroup$
                Thank you for this. So forgive my ignorance, but how did you solve for a with those two equations? I have tan at .176, but how did you know a is 14.99. thanks again.
                $endgroup$
                – jb3330421
                Jan 7 '15 at 23:46












              • $begingroup$
                Ha, i used a calculator :). I'll edit my answer to show how to do it without a solver...
                $endgroup$
                – turkeyhundt
                Jan 7 '15 at 23:47










              • $begingroup$
                great, thank you, i appreciate it.
                $endgroup$
                – jb3330421
                Jan 7 '15 at 23:50










              • $begingroup$
                This is fantastic, thanks for your help. This is my first time using this site. What an amazing resource for math idiots like myself.
                $endgroup$
                – jb3330421
                Jan 7 '15 at 23:56










              • $begingroup$
                Sorry, now my last question: when you add b to both sides, how come .01763 becomes 1.1763, and not .01763b +b? Did I miss something there?
                $endgroup$
                – jb3330421
                Jan 7 '15 at 23:58


















              • $begingroup$
                Thank you for this. So forgive my ignorance, but how did you solve for a with those two equations? I have tan at .176, but how did you know a is 14.99. thanks again.
                $endgroup$
                – jb3330421
                Jan 7 '15 at 23:46












              • $begingroup$
                Ha, i used a calculator :). I'll edit my answer to show how to do it without a solver...
                $endgroup$
                – turkeyhundt
                Jan 7 '15 at 23:47










              • $begingroup$
                great, thank you, i appreciate it.
                $endgroup$
                – jb3330421
                Jan 7 '15 at 23:50










              • $begingroup$
                This is fantastic, thanks for your help. This is my first time using this site. What an amazing resource for math idiots like myself.
                $endgroup$
                – jb3330421
                Jan 7 '15 at 23:56










              • $begingroup$
                Sorry, now my last question: when you add b to both sides, how come .01763 becomes 1.1763, and not .01763b +b? Did I miss something there?
                $endgroup$
                – jb3330421
                Jan 7 '15 at 23:58
















              $begingroup$
              Thank you for this. So forgive my ignorance, but how did you solve for a with those two equations? I have tan at .176, but how did you know a is 14.99. thanks again.
              $endgroup$
              – jb3330421
              Jan 7 '15 at 23:46






              $begingroup$
              Thank you for this. So forgive my ignorance, but how did you solve for a with those two equations? I have tan at .176, but how did you know a is 14.99. thanks again.
              $endgroup$
              – jb3330421
              Jan 7 '15 at 23:46














              $begingroup$
              Ha, i used a calculator :). I'll edit my answer to show how to do it without a solver...
              $endgroup$
              – turkeyhundt
              Jan 7 '15 at 23:47




              $begingroup$
              Ha, i used a calculator :). I'll edit my answer to show how to do it without a solver...
              $endgroup$
              – turkeyhundt
              Jan 7 '15 at 23:47












              $begingroup$
              great, thank you, i appreciate it.
              $endgroup$
              – jb3330421
              Jan 7 '15 at 23:50




              $begingroup$
              great, thank you, i appreciate it.
              $endgroup$
              – jb3330421
              Jan 7 '15 at 23:50












              $begingroup$
              This is fantastic, thanks for your help. This is my first time using this site. What an amazing resource for math idiots like myself.
              $endgroup$
              – jb3330421
              Jan 7 '15 at 23:56




              $begingroup$
              This is fantastic, thanks for your help. This is my first time using this site. What an amazing resource for math idiots like myself.
              $endgroup$
              – jb3330421
              Jan 7 '15 at 23:56












              $begingroup$
              Sorry, now my last question: when you add b to both sides, how come .01763 becomes 1.1763, and not .01763b +b? Did I miss something there?
              $endgroup$
              – jb3330421
              Jan 7 '15 at 23:58




              $begingroup$
              Sorry, now my last question: when you add b to both sides, how come .01763 becomes 1.1763, and not .01763b +b? Did I miss something there?
              $endgroup$
              – jb3330421
              Jan 7 '15 at 23:58











              1












              $begingroup$

              You have two correct answers already.
              What I would like to do is to put the solution in terms that you can
              very easily apply to your problem, that is, I want to give you a simple formula
              to directly compute the coordinates of each vertex of each square.



              Let's take polar coordinates with the origin at the center of the square, so that the large square in your diagram has vertices at
              $(r_0,0)$, $left(r_0,fracpi2right)$, $(r_0,pi)$, $left(r_0,-fracpi2right)$
              where $r_0$ is a positive constant determined by how large you want that square to be.



              Now we rotate $delta$ radians to the right and shrink the square so that the new
              square's vertices lie on the old square's edges.
              (For a $10^circ$ rotation, you want $delta = frac{pi}{180} cdot 10.$)
              Then the origin, one vertex of the original square, and the corresponding vertex of
              the new square make a triangle with angle $delta$ at the origin, $fracpi4$ ($45^circ$)
              at the original square's vertex, and $frac{3pi}{4}-delta$ at the new square's vertex.
              Let $r_1$ be the distance from the origin to the new square's vertex.
              By the law of sines,
              $$ frac{r_1}{sin left(frac{pi}{4}right)}
              = frac{r_0}{sin left(frac{3pi}{4}-deltaright)}.$$
              Therefore
              $$r_1 = frac{sin left(frac{pi}{4}right)}{sin left(frac{3pi}{4}-deltaright)} r_0
              = frac{sin left(frac{pi}{4}right)}{sin left(frac{pi}{4}+deltaright)} r_0.$$
              Let
              $$rho = frac{sin left(frac{pi}{4}right)}{sin left(frac{pi}{4}+deltaright)}$$
              so that $r_1 = rho, r_0.$
              For an angle of $10^circ,$ a little computation shows that $rho approx 0.86321799,$
              that is,
              $$r_1 approx 0.86321799, r_0.$$
              Checking this against the calculations by @turkeyhundt for the $10$-degree rotation,
              we should find that $0.86321799 approx frac{sqrt{a^2+b^2}}{100},$
              and indeed for $b = 85.01,$ $a=100-b$ that is what we find.



              Now observe that in general, if $r_n$ is the distance from the origin to a vertex
              of the $n$th square, then $r_{n+1} = rho, r_n.$
              Also, if $alpha$ is the direction from the origin to a vertex of the $n$th square,
              then the direction from the origin to a vertex of the $n+1$st square is
              $alpha-delta$ (because polar coordinates measure angles counterclockwise
              and we are rotating clockwise).
              Putting these facts together, the vertices of the $n$th square
              have polar coordinates
              $$
              (rho^n r_0,; -ndelta),\
              left(rho^n r_0,; fracpi2-ndeltaright)!,\
              (rho^n r_0,; pi-ndelta),\
              left(rho^n r_0,; -fracpi2-ndeltaright)!.
              $$
              To plot these in Cartesian coordinates, convert the $(r,theta)$ coordinates
              of each vertex of each square to $(x,y)$ coordinate by the usual
              transformation, $x=rcostheta$ and $y=rsintheta.$
              For example, one vertex of the $n$th square will have Cartesian coordinates
              $(rho^n r_0 cos(-ndelta), rho^n r_0 sin(-ndelta)),$ and for the other
              three you simply add a multiple of $fracpi2$ to the angle.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                You have two correct answers already.
                What I would like to do is to put the solution in terms that you can
                very easily apply to your problem, that is, I want to give you a simple formula
                to directly compute the coordinates of each vertex of each square.



                Let's take polar coordinates with the origin at the center of the square, so that the large square in your diagram has vertices at
                $(r_0,0)$, $left(r_0,fracpi2right)$, $(r_0,pi)$, $left(r_0,-fracpi2right)$
                where $r_0$ is a positive constant determined by how large you want that square to be.



                Now we rotate $delta$ radians to the right and shrink the square so that the new
                square's vertices lie on the old square's edges.
                (For a $10^circ$ rotation, you want $delta = frac{pi}{180} cdot 10.$)
                Then the origin, one vertex of the original square, and the corresponding vertex of
                the new square make a triangle with angle $delta$ at the origin, $fracpi4$ ($45^circ$)
                at the original square's vertex, and $frac{3pi}{4}-delta$ at the new square's vertex.
                Let $r_1$ be the distance from the origin to the new square's vertex.
                By the law of sines,
                $$ frac{r_1}{sin left(frac{pi}{4}right)}
                = frac{r_0}{sin left(frac{3pi}{4}-deltaright)}.$$
                Therefore
                $$r_1 = frac{sin left(frac{pi}{4}right)}{sin left(frac{3pi}{4}-deltaright)} r_0
                = frac{sin left(frac{pi}{4}right)}{sin left(frac{pi}{4}+deltaright)} r_0.$$
                Let
                $$rho = frac{sin left(frac{pi}{4}right)}{sin left(frac{pi}{4}+deltaright)}$$
                so that $r_1 = rho, r_0.$
                For an angle of $10^circ,$ a little computation shows that $rho approx 0.86321799,$
                that is,
                $$r_1 approx 0.86321799, r_0.$$
                Checking this against the calculations by @turkeyhundt for the $10$-degree rotation,
                we should find that $0.86321799 approx frac{sqrt{a^2+b^2}}{100},$
                and indeed for $b = 85.01,$ $a=100-b$ that is what we find.



                Now observe that in general, if $r_n$ is the distance from the origin to a vertex
                of the $n$th square, then $r_{n+1} = rho, r_n.$
                Also, if $alpha$ is the direction from the origin to a vertex of the $n$th square,
                then the direction from the origin to a vertex of the $n+1$st square is
                $alpha-delta$ (because polar coordinates measure angles counterclockwise
                and we are rotating clockwise).
                Putting these facts together, the vertices of the $n$th square
                have polar coordinates
                $$
                (rho^n r_0,; -ndelta),\
                left(rho^n r_0,; fracpi2-ndeltaright)!,\
                (rho^n r_0,; pi-ndelta),\
                left(rho^n r_0,; -fracpi2-ndeltaright)!.
                $$
                To plot these in Cartesian coordinates, convert the $(r,theta)$ coordinates
                of each vertex of each square to $(x,y)$ coordinate by the usual
                transformation, $x=rcostheta$ and $y=rsintheta.$
                For example, one vertex of the $n$th square will have Cartesian coordinates
                $(rho^n r_0 cos(-ndelta), rho^n r_0 sin(-ndelta)),$ and for the other
                three you simply add a multiple of $fracpi2$ to the angle.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  You have two correct answers already.
                  What I would like to do is to put the solution in terms that you can
                  very easily apply to your problem, that is, I want to give you a simple formula
                  to directly compute the coordinates of each vertex of each square.



                  Let's take polar coordinates with the origin at the center of the square, so that the large square in your diagram has vertices at
                  $(r_0,0)$, $left(r_0,fracpi2right)$, $(r_0,pi)$, $left(r_0,-fracpi2right)$
                  where $r_0$ is a positive constant determined by how large you want that square to be.



                  Now we rotate $delta$ radians to the right and shrink the square so that the new
                  square's vertices lie on the old square's edges.
                  (For a $10^circ$ rotation, you want $delta = frac{pi}{180} cdot 10.$)
                  Then the origin, one vertex of the original square, and the corresponding vertex of
                  the new square make a triangle with angle $delta$ at the origin, $fracpi4$ ($45^circ$)
                  at the original square's vertex, and $frac{3pi}{4}-delta$ at the new square's vertex.
                  Let $r_1$ be the distance from the origin to the new square's vertex.
                  By the law of sines,
                  $$ frac{r_1}{sin left(frac{pi}{4}right)}
                  = frac{r_0}{sin left(frac{3pi}{4}-deltaright)}.$$
                  Therefore
                  $$r_1 = frac{sin left(frac{pi}{4}right)}{sin left(frac{3pi}{4}-deltaright)} r_0
                  = frac{sin left(frac{pi}{4}right)}{sin left(frac{pi}{4}+deltaright)} r_0.$$
                  Let
                  $$rho = frac{sin left(frac{pi}{4}right)}{sin left(frac{pi}{4}+deltaright)}$$
                  so that $r_1 = rho, r_0.$
                  For an angle of $10^circ,$ a little computation shows that $rho approx 0.86321799,$
                  that is,
                  $$r_1 approx 0.86321799, r_0.$$
                  Checking this against the calculations by @turkeyhundt for the $10$-degree rotation,
                  we should find that $0.86321799 approx frac{sqrt{a^2+b^2}}{100},$
                  and indeed for $b = 85.01,$ $a=100-b$ that is what we find.



                  Now observe that in general, if $r_n$ is the distance from the origin to a vertex
                  of the $n$th square, then $r_{n+1} = rho, r_n.$
                  Also, if $alpha$ is the direction from the origin to a vertex of the $n$th square,
                  then the direction from the origin to a vertex of the $n+1$st square is
                  $alpha-delta$ (because polar coordinates measure angles counterclockwise
                  and we are rotating clockwise).
                  Putting these facts together, the vertices of the $n$th square
                  have polar coordinates
                  $$
                  (rho^n r_0,; -ndelta),\
                  left(rho^n r_0,; fracpi2-ndeltaright)!,\
                  (rho^n r_0,; pi-ndelta),\
                  left(rho^n r_0,; -fracpi2-ndeltaright)!.
                  $$
                  To plot these in Cartesian coordinates, convert the $(r,theta)$ coordinates
                  of each vertex of each square to $(x,y)$ coordinate by the usual
                  transformation, $x=rcostheta$ and $y=rsintheta.$
                  For example, one vertex of the $n$th square will have Cartesian coordinates
                  $(rho^n r_0 cos(-ndelta), rho^n r_0 sin(-ndelta)),$ and for the other
                  three you simply add a multiple of $fracpi2$ to the angle.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  You have two correct answers already.
                  What I would like to do is to put the solution in terms that you can
                  very easily apply to your problem, that is, I want to give you a simple formula
                  to directly compute the coordinates of each vertex of each square.



                  Let's take polar coordinates with the origin at the center of the square, so that the large square in your diagram has vertices at
                  $(r_0,0)$, $left(r_0,fracpi2right)$, $(r_0,pi)$, $left(r_0,-fracpi2right)$
                  where $r_0$ is a positive constant determined by how large you want that square to be.



                  Now we rotate $delta$ radians to the right and shrink the square so that the new
                  square's vertices lie on the old square's edges.
                  (For a $10^circ$ rotation, you want $delta = frac{pi}{180} cdot 10.$)
                  Then the origin, one vertex of the original square, and the corresponding vertex of
                  the new square make a triangle with angle $delta$ at the origin, $fracpi4$ ($45^circ$)
                  at the original square's vertex, and $frac{3pi}{4}-delta$ at the new square's vertex.
                  Let $r_1$ be the distance from the origin to the new square's vertex.
                  By the law of sines,
                  $$ frac{r_1}{sin left(frac{pi}{4}right)}
                  = frac{r_0}{sin left(frac{3pi}{4}-deltaright)}.$$
                  Therefore
                  $$r_1 = frac{sin left(frac{pi}{4}right)}{sin left(frac{3pi}{4}-deltaright)} r_0
                  = frac{sin left(frac{pi}{4}right)}{sin left(frac{pi}{4}+deltaright)} r_0.$$
                  Let
                  $$rho = frac{sin left(frac{pi}{4}right)}{sin left(frac{pi}{4}+deltaright)}$$
                  so that $r_1 = rho, r_0.$
                  For an angle of $10^circ,$ a little computation shows that $rho approx 0.86321799,$
                  that is,
                  $$r_1 approx 0.86321799, r_0.$$
                  Checking this against the calculations by @turkeyhundt for the $10$-degree rotation,
                  we should find that $0.86321799 approx frac{sqrt{a^2+b^2}}{100},$
                  and indeed for $b = 85.01,$ $a=100-b$ that is what we find.



                  Now observe that in general, if $r_n$ is the distance from the origin to a vertex
                  of the $n$th square, then $r_{n+1} = rho, r_n.$
                  Also, if $alpha$ is the direction from the origin to a vertex of the $n$th square,
                  then the direction from the origin to a vertex of the $n+1$st square is
                  $alpha-delta$ (because polar coordinates measure angles counterclockwise
                  and we are rotating clockwise).
                  Putting these facts together, the vertices of the $n$th square
                  have polar coordinates
                  $$
                  (rho^n r_0,; -ndelta),\
                  left(rho^n r_0,; fracpi2-ndeltaright)!,\
                  (rho^n r_0,; pi-ndelta),\
                  left(rho^n r_0,; -fracpi2-ndeltaright)!.
                  $$
                  To plot these in Cartesian coordinates, convert the $(r,theta)$ coordinates
                  of each vertex of each square to $(x,y)$ coordinate by the usual
                  transformation, $x=rcostheta$ and $y=rsintheta.$
                  For example, one vertex of the $n$th square will have Cartesian coordinates
                  $(rho^n r_0 cos(-ndelta), rho^n r_0 sin(-ndelta)),$ and for the other
                  three you simply add a multiple of $fracpi2$ to the angle.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Jan 10 '15 at 17:11

























                  answered Jan 10 '15 at 15:35









                  David KDavid K

                  55.5k345121




                  55.5k345121






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1095827%2fscaling-and-rotating-a-square-so-that-it-is-inscribed-in-the-original-square%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Bundesstraße 106

                      Verónica Boquete

                      Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten